Oak Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 36.2 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement resident's plan of care based on current status for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers, 3 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents, and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident lacked a care plan for a current stage 3 pressure ulcer, lacked a care plan for behavior of cannabis smoking, lacked a care plan for antiplatelet medication, and not following fall interventions. (Resident 28, Resident 9, Resident 1, Resident 30, Resident 5)Findings include:1. During an observation on 12/18/25 at 10:48 A.M., Resident 5 was observed in the common area by the nurses' station in his wheelchair. The facility failed to have any activities available to the resident while seated in the wheelchair. During an observation on 12/18/25 at 11:36 A.M., Activities Assistant 4 pushed Resident 5 to the dining room to eat. Multiple residents entered the dining room after Resident 5. On 12/16/25 at 1:29 P.M., Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to reflect current status for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident's pressure ulcer care plan had not been discontinued when the area healed, resident's care plans reflected current use of a discontinued medications, a fall care plan was not revised to include current interventions, and a current diagnosis of shingles and pneumonia that were no longer active (Resident 28, Resident 4, Resident 30, Resident 1)Findings include:1. On 12/21/25 at 9:12 P.M., Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus type II, anxiety, and peripheral vascular disease. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/24/25, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact, on an antibiotic, and not taking an anticoagulant. Physician Orders included, but were not limited to, the following: Eliquis 2.5 milligram (mg) tablet (anticoagulant), give one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for all residents for 3 of 3 random observations. The resident's oxygen tubing was dragging on the ground, the urinary catheter bag and tubing were dragging on the floor, and clean linens were carried against a staff member's uniform shirt. (Resident 4, Laundry 9, Resident 23)Findings include: 1. On 12/11/25 at 11:57 A.M., Resident 23 was observed propelling himself in his wheelchair down the hallway with a urinary catheter tube dragging under the resident's black shoe and hitting the floor at times. On 12/17/25 at 11:15 A.M., Resident 23 was observed in the common area by the nurse's station in a wheelchair with a urinary catheter bag dragging the floor under the wheelchair. Two nursing staff members walked past the resident, and then the Activity Director wheeled him to the front activity room, continuing to drag the catheter bag on the floor. The resident continued sitting in the activity room with his catheter bag resting on the floor. On 12/18/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure transportation was provided for a resident to get to her neurologist appointments for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for transportation. A resident receiving Botox injections for her Multiple Sclerosis (MS) missed two appointments due to not having transportation. (Resident 9)Finding includes:During an interview on 12/15/25 at 10:44 A.M., Resident 9 indicated her legs hurt bad. Her last neurologist appointment was cancelled by the facility because of transportation issues and now she had to wait until February to get her Botox injection for her MS. On 12/21/25 at 10:28 A.M., Resident 9's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, MS, diabetes mellitus type II, and pain in bilateral lower legs. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/15/25, indicated Resident 9 was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for toileting, showering, and transfers. Current Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, neurologist appointment with: (provider…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for behavior concerns. A resident's behaviors were not monitored, tracked, or treated leading to an escalation of behaviors. (Resident 2)Finding includes:On 12/17/25 at 11:28 A.M., Resident 2 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the front activity room participating in an activity. On 12/16/25 at 1:32 P.M., Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, depression, and bipolar disorder. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/18/25, indicated no cognitive impairment and no behaviors. Resident 2's clinical record lacked a physician's order to monitor behaviors. A behavior monitoring care plan, initiated 6/23/23 and last revised 7/17/25, indicated behaviors related to medication changes in 2/2023 as well as a roommate change in 6/2023. A behavior care plan, initiated and last revised 3/26/24, indicated behaviors related to threats of self-harm and suicide. Behavior…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs of residents for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 2 closed records reviewed. Medications were not available to be administered as prescribed. (Resident 4, Resident 18)Findings include:1.On 12/16/25 at 1:27 P.M., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, status post hip surgery, dementia, anxiety, and depression. The most recent significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/18/25, indicated a severe cognitive impairment. Physician orders included, but were not limited to:Aspirin 81mg (milligrams), 1 capsule every 3 days, dated 11/14/25. Breo Ellipta inhalation aerosol powder 100-25mcg (micrograms)/act (actuation/puff) 1 inhalation one time a day, dated 11/12/25. Lovenox injection 40mg/0.4ml (milliliters) inject 1 dose one time a day for 28 administrations, dated 11/12/25. Resident 4's medication administration record (MAR) indicated aspirin was not administered on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
  Have policies on smoking.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its smoking policy was implemented for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for smoking. Resident's smoking evaluations were not completed quarterly. (Resident 9, Resident 1)Findings include:1. On 12/21/25 at 9:12 P.M., Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus type II, tobacco use, and peripheral vascular disease. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/24/25, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for transfers and toileting.Resident 1's current care plans included a Smoking Care Plan, last revised 6/19/23.The last smoking evaluation on Resident 1 was completed on 3/25/25.2. On 12/21/25 at 10:28 A.M., Resident 9's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Multiple Sclerosis, pain in bilateral legs, and tobacco dependence.The most recent quarterly MDS assessment indicated Resident 9 was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for toileting, showers, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and distributed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety during 1 of 1 kitchen observations and failed to complete hand hygiene during meal service. Food was stored in a reach in freezer in the kitchen open to air, undated, and unlabeled. The kitchen equipment and spaces contained dust and debris, and the staff failed to complete hand hygiene after coming in contact with residents while assisting in the dining room. (Resident D, Resident F, Resident G) Findings include: 1. During a kitchen observation on 5/8/25 at 10:55 A.M., a standing reach in freezer contained a box of peas that were open to air, a box of broccoli open to air, a box of cookie dough open to air, an undated bag of pancakes open to air, an unlabeled and undated bag of meat patties, and an unlabeled and undated bag of frozen (what appeared to be) hashbrowns. The kitchen floor under the stove and around the base of the walls had a build up of dust an debris, the ceiling vents and panels contained…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate and appropriate medication administration practices were in place for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. A resident received another resident's medications after the administering nurse preset residents' medications prior to the medication pass. (Resident C) Finding includes: On 4/1/25 at 10:45 A.M., an Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) Facility Reportable Incident (FRI) form, dated 3/23/25 at 1:01 P.M., indicated Resident C was given incorrect medications in error. The follow-up FRI, dated 3/28/25, indicated a RN 4 had set up medications prior to administering them and Resident C received the wrong medications. During record review on 4/1/25 at 11:00 A.M., Resident C's diagnoses included but was not limited to, paraplegia, anemia, depression, and seizures. Resident C's care plan included, but was not limited to, resident had an alteration in gastro-intestinal status (initiated 3/19/25) with an intervention that included, administer medications as ordered. Resident had an alteration in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appetizing and palatable meals for 1 of 1 lunch trays sampled on 1 of 2 halls. Residents complained of cold food temperatures and unappetizing food during meals. (100 hall, Resident J, Resident M, Resident P) Finding includes: During an interview on 12/30/24 at 10:40 A.M., Resident J indicated that she disliked the food at the facility. During an interview on 12/30/24 at 10:55 A.M., Resident M indicated at 1:00 P.M., Resident M indicated that the hot food was often served cold. During a review of facility Resident Council minutes on 12/30/24 at 11:10 A.M., a concern was reported to the facility, dated 12/27/24, that the hot food was cold and colder than last month. Resident Council minutes from 11/29/24 indicated, cold bacon every day, hot food has been cold when it comes to the hall rooms, tired of having the same food . chicken strips and French fries three times in 7 days . During an observation on 12/30/24 at 11:45 A.M., a lunch cart arrived on the 100 hall. At 11:45 A.M., the cart door was opened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IDE MANAGEMENT GROUP — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $648K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN