Cathedral Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 63.8 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The clinical record lacked a plan of care for resident's taking anticonvulsant and diuretic medications. (Resident 2, Resident 7, Resident 59)Findings include: 1. On 7/22/25 at 10:56 A.M., Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and Parkinson's disease. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/24/25, indicated Resident 2's cognition was severely impaired and received an antipsychotic medication. Current physician's orders included, but were not limited to, the following:Gabapentin (anticonvulsant) 400 milligram (mg), give one capsule by mouth three times a day for pain, ordered 6/2/25 Lasix 40 mg, give one tablet orally two times a day for edema, ordered 6/12/25 The clinical record lacked a care plan for diuretic and anticonvulsant use. The July 2025 Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 2 of 5 residents observed for care, and 2 of 10 residents reviewed for medication administration. Staff did not wash hands with at least a 20 second lather, did not change gloves and perform hand sanitization from dirty to clean tasks, did not wear gloves when administering an injection, and touched resident pills with bare hands. (Resident 34, Resident 37, Resident 20, Resident 9) Findings included: 1. On 9/9/24 at 7:27 A.M., RN (Registered Nurse) 15 was observed during a medication administration to Resident 20. RN 15 came out of the pantry room upstairs with a drink for the resident. She proceeded to prepare her medications without performing hand hygiene. She opened the medication cart, opened the narcotic box, popped out the resident's clonazepam (anxiety medication) tablet into her bare hand, and then placed it into the medication cup. After preparing all of the medications,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician and resident representative were notified of a change in condition for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls. The physician and resident representative were not notified of a resident's fall or x-ray results, and the resident representative was not notified of an injury. (Resident 8) Findings include: On 9/9/24 at 10:29 A.M., Resident 8's representative indicated she had not been contacted in several months about any falls, injuries, or x-rays. To her knowledge, Resident 8 had not fallen or had any injuries recently. At that time, the representative indicated she would be the one to notify of any changes in Resident 8's condition. On 9/10/24 at 10:26 A.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, diabetes, and Down's Syndrome. The most recent Quarterly and State Optional MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 6/11/24, indicated a severe cognitive impairment, and a requirement of setup with supervision for bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessments for 1 of 1 resident assessments reviewed and 2 of 5 unnecessary medications reviewed. A resident's traumatic brain injury, a resident's injections, and a resident's insulin use were not marked on the MDS Assessments. A resident's bed rail was marked incorrectly as a restraint on the MDS. (Resident 8, Resident 5, Resident 27) Findings included: 1. On 9/11/24 at 8:42 A.M., Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia on right dominant side, dementia, epilepsy, and TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury). The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 8/6/24, indicated Resident 5's cognition was moderately impaired, an extensive assist of 2 staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and the active diagnosis of TBI was marked no. 2. On 9/10/24 at 10:39 A.M., Resident 27's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's and Rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of muscle tissue that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were completed for 1 of 12 residents reviewed with diabetes. A follow up assessment was not completed after a low blood sugar reading as indicated. (Resident 8) Finding includes: On 9/10/24 at 10:26 A.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, diabetes. The most recent Quarterly and State Optional MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 6/11/24, indicated a severe cognitive impairment, and a requirement of setup with supervision for bed mobility and transfers. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Accu check four times a day for diabetes, dated 2/17/24. Blood sugar 70 or below and able to swallow - Give 4 ounces orange juice or 6 ounces soda and repeat blood sugar after 15 minutes. Repeat if necessary and follow up with cheese crackers, milk and fruit or sandwich as needed for hypoglycemia, dated 12/18/24. A current diabetes mellitus care plan included, but was not limited to, the following interventions: Obtain and monitor lab…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were completed appropriately for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. Fall risk assessments were not thorough and complete, and 72 hour follow up for a fall was not initiated immediately after the fall. (Resident 20, Resident 8) Findings include: 1. On 9/12/24 at 9:01 A.M., Resident 20 was propelling self down the hall in a wheelchair when she stood up and pushed wheelchair to room. LPN 6 was walking down the hall, came up beside Resident 20 and reminded her she had a walker to use if she didn't want to use the wheelchair. On 9/10/24 at 11:27 A.M., Resident 20's clinical records were reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, type II diabetes mellitus, repeated falls, extrapyramidal and movement disorder, anxiety disorder, and borderline personality disorder. The most current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/2/24, indicated Resident 20 was severely cognitively impaired, required supervision with bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor for side-effects related to antipsychotic drug use for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for psychotropic drug use. (Resident 63) Findings included: Resident 63's clinical record was reviewed on 9/13/24 at 1:02 P.M. An annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 6/20/24 indicated Resident had some cognitive impairment, no behaviors noted, required anywhere from supervision to extensive assist with mobility and transfers. Diagnoses in Resident 63's chart included but were not limited to paranoid schizophrenia. Physician orders in Resident 63's chart included but were not limited to, clozapine 100 mg (milligrams) 3 tablets a day, dated 5/11/23. Another order for clozapine 100 mg 1.5 tablets daily was found, dated 4/2/234. The Resident was being given a total of 450 mg a day of clozapine. Clozapine is an antipsychotic medication used for treatment resistant schizophrenia. An order was also placed on 3/15/23 to monitor for side effects of antipsychotic medications, listing many side effects for nursing staff to monitor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for notification of change. A resident received a dose of the wrong insulin. (Resident 8) Finding includes: On 9/10/24 at 10:26 A.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, diabetes. The most recent Quarterly and State Optional MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 6/11/24, indicated a severe cognitive impairment, and a requirement of setup with supervision for bed mobility and transfers. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: NovoLOG Mix 70/30 FlexPen (a mixture of insulin aspart protamine, an intermediate-acting human insulin, and insulin aspart, a rapid-acting insulin) subcutaneous suspension pen-injector (70/30) 100 unit/ml (milliliter), inject 20 units one time a day, dated 7/24/24. NovoLOG Mix 70/30 FlexPen subcutaneous suspension pen-injector (70/30) 100 unit/ml (milliliter), inject 50 units one time a day, dated 7/24/24. Resident 8 did not have a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
  Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to uphold professional standards of colostomy care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for ostomy care. A resident's colostomy bag was adhered to the resident with duct tape in preparation for resident transport to a local hospital. (Resident D) Finding includes: During record review on 8/23/24 at 10:30 A.M., Resident D's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acquired absence of other specified parts of digestive tract and schizoaffective disorder. Resident D's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/19/24, indicated Resident D had an ostomy, required supervision with activities of daily living (ADL's) including toileting, bathing, and personal hygiene, and had delusions one to three days during a seven day review period, and had severe cognitive impairment. Resident D's physician orders included, but were not limited to, provide right upper quadrant (RUQ) colostomy care and change every Monday and Thursday on night shift and as needed if soiled or due to dislodgment. Use Skin-Prep…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 allegations of abuse reviewed. Following an allegation of perceived abuse, the facility failed to report the incident and findings to the State Survey Agency within the required time frame. (Resident D) Finding includes: During record review on 1/9/24 at 11:30 A.M., Resident D's diagnoses included but were not limited to, generalized anxiety, chronic pain, and major depressive disorder. Resident D's most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 10/14/23, included that the resident was cognitively intact. Resident D's nurses notes included, but were not limited, to a behavior note, dated 12/18/23, at 12:07 P.M. The note included, Resident is continuous [sic] about telling staff about the bruise she received on her arm. (Director of Nursing, Facility Administrator, Social Service), MDS have already investigated bruise and spoke with resident about the incident and resident agrees there was no harm intended but continues to tell staff and anyone who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IDE MANAGEMENT GROUP — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $863K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN