Warsaw Meadows
300 E Prairie St, Warsaw, IN 46580 · For profit - Corporation · 80 certified beds · (574) 267-8922 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $105,073 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-13)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.4% | 11.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.8% | 1.1% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 26.9% | 25.2% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.1% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.7% | 11.9% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.4% | 23.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.3% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.0% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.4% | 13.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 63.6% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.1–17.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 61.4 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
29 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent physical and emotional abuse for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse prevention. (Residents C & D) This deficient practice resulted in 1 of 3 residents sustaining extensive bruising (Resident C) and 2 of 3 residents experiencing mental anguish and fear. (Residents C & D)Findings include:1.A record review for Resident B was completed on 9/29/2025 at 10: 46 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: schizophrenia, alcohol abuse, epilepsy, drug induced dyskinesia, major depressive disorder and mood disorder.A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 9/29/2025, indicted Resident B was cognitively intact, transferred independently, received antipsychotic, antidepressant and anticonvulsant medication, had exhibited behaviors of physical behavioral symptoms for 1-3 days during the assessment period and verbal behavioral symptoms for 1-3 days of the assessment look back period. The current care plans for Resident B, revised on 5/30/2025, included the following plan: Resident is at risk for exhibiting behaviors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure cleaning chemicals were stored securely on the memory care unit. This failure resulted in a resident with Alzheimer's Disease and dementia that accessed an unlocked water conditioner closet, handling and ingesting drain cleaner. The resident suffered pain, nausea, vomiting and required emergency room services, that included undergoing anesthesia for a gastro-intestinal (GI) endoscopy procedure to evaluate for damages. This affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents, (Resident B). The deficient practice was corrected on 7/11/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.Finding includes: Review of a facility reported incident, #633, submitted to the Indiana State Department of Health on 7/10/25, indicated on 7/10/25 at 1:30 A.M., Resident B was found vomiting in the Memory Care hallway and the vomit allegedly had a smell of bleach. The resident was then assisted to his room by staff and no distress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement effective interventions to prevent physical and verbal Resident to Resident abuse from recurring. This deficient practice resulted in Resident B exhibiting physically abusive behaviors which caused harm to 3 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents C, D, & E) Findings included: 1. On 8/13/2024 at 1:37 P.M., a review of a facility reported incident 8/13/2024 at 1:37 P.M., indicated the following: Incident date: 5/29/2024 at 6:30 P.M. Residents involved: Resident C with the diagnoses of dementia with mood disorder, depression and anxiety. Resident B with the diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, psychotic disorder with delusions, depression and dementia with agitation. Description added: Staff alleged Resident B made contact with Resident C's shoulders and left forearm while ambulating in the Memory Care hallway. Action taken: Residents were immediately separated. Resident B was placed on 1:1 staff supervision. Nurse completed a skin assessment, no findings. Type of injury: Added 5/29/2024- Discolored areas noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-10-13 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to establish a discharge plan and to ensure documentation was accurate and allowed at least 30 days prior to the transfer for a facility initiated transfer and failed to allow a resident to remain the building when the resident verbalized opposition to the transfer for 1 of 3 discharged records reviewed. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in the resident inflicting self harm due to the impending transfer. Finding includes: The record for Resident B was reviewed on 10/13/2023 at 9:45 A.M. Resident B was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to: type 1 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis with coma, open wound of the lower left leg with subsequent encounter, Crohn's disease of the large intestine without complications, hyperlipidemia, calculus of lower urinary tract, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet and pain. An admission assessment, completed on 8/10/2023, indicated the resident was admitted for long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy to report an allegation of verbal abuse in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse, (Resident B). Finding includes:On 12/30/25 at 11:43 A.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Resident B was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia, anxiety, depression, benign brain tumor, age-related debility, low back pain, cognitive communication deficit, orthostatic hypotension, insomnia, muscle weakness. Review of a facility reported incident, Incident Number 652, indicated on 12/10/25 at 2:01 P.M., staff reported that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4, was overheard using profanity to tell Resident B to shut up while in the hallway of the Memory Care Unit. On 12/10/25 an investigation was initiated, and CNA 4 was removed from the schedule pending an investigation. A follow-up dated 12/15/25 indicated Resident B did not recall the event and the staff member…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and serve food in a sanitary manner, related to undated foods, expired foods and thumbing of the plates for 1 of 1 kitchen and 2 of 2 nutritional pantries. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 63 of 63 residents who receive meals from the kitchen. Findings include: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen, on 9/2/2025 at 9:48 A.M., with the Dietary Manager the following was observed: - in the stand up freezer 2 bags of frozen pancakes with no use by date During an interview, on 9/2/2025 at 9:53 A.M., the Dietary Manager Indicated there should have been a use by date on the pancakes. 2. During a follow up tour of the kitchen, on 9/03/2025 at 10:27 A.M., [NAME] 13 placed an opened container of pureed chicon on the counter top and placed a bucket of sanitizing liquid right next to the open container of chicken. During an interview, on 9/4/2025 at 11:20 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated food items should not be near the sanitizing water bucket. 3. During an observation, on 9/04/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a person centered care plan for (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) PTSD and failed to develop a care plan after a hospitalization with a new initiation of an anticoagulant medication and a diagnosis of severe anemia for 2 of 21 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 15 and 6)Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 15 was reviewed on 9/4/2025 at 9:53 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to cancer, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder, bipolar, schizophrenia and PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder). An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 6/2/2025, indicated the resident had the ability to express ideas and wants, experienced delusions and received antipsychotic, antidepressant, anticonvulsant, and opioid medications. Current Physician ordered medications included the following: Prazosin 2 mg capsule at bedtime for PTSD. A current Care Plan, initiated on 5/28/2025, indicated Resident 15 had a psychosocial well-being problem related to a history of personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were invited to care plan meetings and meetings were held timely for 5 of 21 residents reviewed for care plans. (Residents 15, 21, 17, 4 & 30)Findings include: 1.During an interview, on 9/2/2025 at 10:54 A.M., Resident 15 indicated she had never been to one (care plan meeting). The record for Resident 15 was reviewed on 9/4/2025 at 9:48 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to bipolar, Schizophrenia, anxiety, PTSD, (post traumatic stress disorder), cancer, insomnia and delusions. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 9/4/2025, indicated Resident 15 had clear speech, make herself understood and understood others. A Multidisciplinary Care Conference Note, dated 5/22/2025, indicated a care conference was held on 5/23/2025 at 9:00 A.M. Attendance at the meeting was documented as an LPN, a QMA and the resident's guardian via phone. The form lacked the documentation indicating the resident had been invited or was in attendance for the care meeting. A Multidisciplinary Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for a hypotensive medication, failed to administer bowel protocols for constipation, failed to follow physician's orders for insulin administration and failed to assess and document a skin issue for 4 of 18 residents reviewed for care needs. (Residents 5, 3, 7 & 18)Findings include:1.A record review for Resident 5 was completed, on 9/3/2025 at 2:01 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: atrial fibrillation, hypotension and coronary artery disease. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/2/2025, indicated Resident 5 was cognitively intact. A Physician's Order, dated 4/3/2025, indicated the resident was to receive Midodrine 10 milligrams by mouth three times a day for hypotension. In addition there was an order to hold the Midodrine for a systolic blood pressure greater than 110 mmHg (millimeters of mercury). The August 2025 Medication Administration Record indicated the following blood pressure readings with the administration of Midodrine: -8/1/2025 8:00 P.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a consent for psychotropic medication use was obtained timely for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. (Resident 15)Finding includes: The record for Resident 15 was reviewed on 9/4/2025 at 9:48 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: bipolar, Schizophrenia, anxiety, PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder), insomnia, non Alzheimer's dementia and delusions. The current Physician's Orders for medications included the following:-Trazadone 50 mg (milligram) at bed time ordered on 5/21/2025 for insomnia.-Lamotrigine 200 mg twice a day ordered on 5/21/2025 for Bipolar disease.-Lexapro 10 mg every day ordered on 5/22/2025 for depression.-Clonazepam 1 mg three times a day ordered on 6/4/2025 for anxiety.-Risperdal 0.5 mg at bed time ordered on 6/4/2025 for schizophrenia. A Psychoactive Medication therapy informed consent form, dated 6/17/2025, indicated the POA (power of attorney)/guardian had given a verbal consent on 6/17/2025 for the use of the above medications. The consent was obtained after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident 18)Finding includes:During an interview, on 9/4/2025 at 1:55 P.M., CNA 8 indicated when she had came into work one morning about 2 months ago, the night aide, CNA 17, had given her report and said that Resident 18 had been up between 2-3:00 A.M., and she had had to redirect him back to his room. CNA 8 indicated then the night nurse had shown her a picture of Resident 18 with scratches all over his face. The night nurse indicated she had seen the resident and the night aide, CNA 17, fighting each other. CNA 8 indicated the previous Social Service/Unit Director (SSD) had came into work and had seen Resident 18 and asked, staff what had happened to him. CNA 8 indicated she told the former SSD that she was going to text the Administrator (regarding the scratches on Resident 18 and the night nurse's report about a fight between CNA 17 and Resident 18) but the SSD indicated she had already texted him. CNA 8 indicated when she came to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident 18)Finding includes:During an interview, on 9/4/2025 at 1:55 P.M., CNA 8 indicated when she had came into work one morning about 2 months ago, the night aide, CNA 17, had given her report and said that Resident 18 had been up between 2-3:00 A.M., and she had had to redirect him back to his room. CNA 8 indicated then the night nurse had shown her a picture of Resident 18 with scratches all over his face. The night nurse indicated she had seen the resident and the night aide, CNA 17, fighting each other. CNA 8 indicated the previous Social Service/Unit Director (SSD) had came into work and had seen Resident 18 and asked, staff what had happened to him. CNA 8 indicated she told the former SSD that she was going to text the Administrator (regarding the scratches on Resident 18 and the night nurse's report about a fight between CNA 17 and Resident 18) but the SSD indicated she had already texted him. CNA 8 indicated when she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for elopement risk were in place for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for elopement. (Resident 65)Finding includes:A record review for Resident 65 was completed, on 9/4/2025 at10:56 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: altered mental status, visual hallucinations and disorientation.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDs) assessment, dated 7/3/2025, indicated Resident 65 had severe cognitive impairment.During an observation, on 9/3/2025 at 10:24 A.M., Resident 65 was observed seated in the common area parallel to the front exit door. A Wanderguard (electronic device that magnetically locks doors if a resident wearing the device comes in close proximity of the door) device was not observed on the resident. During an observation, on 9/4/2025 at 10:55 A.M., Resident 65 was observed seated in the common area parallel to the front exit door. A Wanderguard device was not observed on either wrist or ankle.During an observation, on 9/5/2025 at 11:46 A.M., Resident 65 was observed walking on a hallway and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident survivor of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) received culturally competent trauma informed care to reduce triggers for behaviors and reduce emotional distress for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for PTSD (Resident 15) The record for Resident 15 was reviewed on 9/4/2025 at 9:53 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to cancer, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder, bipolar, schizophrenia and PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder).An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 6/2/2025, indicated Resident 15 had delusions and received the following medications: antipsychotic, antidepressant, anticonvulsant, and opioids. A Nurse's Progress Note, dated 6/23/2025 at 5:40 P.M., indicated Resident 15 had received a call from her mother earlier in the afternoon and had been moody and tearful ever since she had received the call. Her behaviors were escalating towards dinner time. When her food tray arrived, the resident went into her room, got her walker and proceeded to walk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 15 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered medications were available for administration for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident 15)Finding includes: The record for Resident 15 was reviewed on 9/4/2025 at 9:48 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: bipolar, Schizophrenia, anxiety, PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder), insomnia, cancer and delusions. Current Physician Orders included the following medications:-Lamotrigine (anticonvulsant) 50 mg (milligram) 1 tablet two times a day for Bipolar disease.-Trazadone (antidepressant) 50 mg 1 tablet at bedtime for insomnia.-Prazosin (antihypertensive) 2 mg 1 capsule at bedtime for PTSD. The May Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated, on 5/30 and 5/31/2025, the Prazosin medication had not been administered because it was not available. The June MAR indicated, on 6/5, 6/6, 6/7, 6/8, 6/9. 6/10, 6/11, and 6/19/2025, the Prazosin medication had not been administered because it was not available. The July MAR indicated, on 7/1, 7/11, 7/12, and 7/17/2025, the Prazosin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate interventions to prevent the development of pressures ulcers for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident B). Finding includes: A record review for Resident B was completed on 12/20/2024 at 12:45 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, heart failure and lymphedema. A Braden Scale (assessment to determine a resident's risk for developing pressure ulcers) assessment, completed on 8/21/2024, indicated Resident B was at risk for skin breakdown. A Braden Scale assessment, completed on 9/24/2024. indicated Resident B was at a moderate risk for skin breakdown. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/2/2024, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact, required substantial/maximum assistance for bed mobility and transfers, was dependent on shower assistance, was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, had a stage 3 pressure ulcer and diabetic foot ulcers. The assessment indicated the resident utilized a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions related to undated and unlabeled foods and drinks in 1 of 1 kitchens (Main kitchen). This issue had the potential to affect 69 of 69 residents who resided in the facility and received food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 8/7/2024, at 9:41 A.M., during an initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager, the following items were observed: -: in the double-door freezer there were 2 opened bags of frozen meat patties unlabeled and undated - in the double-door cooler there was a tray of beverages already poured, unlabeled and only one cup bearing the date of 8/8/2024 - the dry pantry contained multiple bread products without labels or dates that included the following: 5 hot dog bun bags, 3 hamburger bag buns and 5 English muffin bags - in the walk-in fridge there were two pitchers of juice without dates or labels. During an interview, on 8/7/2024 at 9:41 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated all food and beverages should have labels with the name of the item and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered plan of care was created for residents with delusions (Residents 36 & E) a resident with hallucinations (Resident 55), and for a resident receiving hospice care (Resident 16) for 4 of 21 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 36 was reviewed on 8/9/2024 at 1:00 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: psychotic disorder with delusions, depression, dementia with agitation, and anxiety. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident had received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. Resident 36's medications included, but were not limited to: Paliperidone ER (an antipsychotic) Extended Release 24 Hour 3 mg (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for delusions related to psychotic disorder with delusions. The clinical record lacked a person centered care plan for delusions. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a baseline care plan meeting and routine care plan meeting for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care planning. (Resident 53) Finding includes: During an interview, on 8/7/2024 at 10:08 A.M., Resident 53 indicated the facility would not let him access his test results until he was discharged . On 8/7/2024 at 11:26 A.M., Resident 53 indicated that he had not had a baseline care plan meeting, nor any care plan meeting since admission. A record review for Resident 53 was completed on 8/9/2024 at 9:24 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus type 2, idiopathic acute pancreatitis, cannabis use, iron deficiency anemia, and chronic kidney disease. Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from admission to the current date of 8/7/2024 for Resident 53, no documentation could be located regarding a baseline care plan meeting, nor a routine care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADLs) regarding shower/bathing opportunities (Residentt 53 and 9) and nail, hair and shaving assistance (Resident 1) for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care. Findings include: 1.During an interview, on 8/7/2024 at 11:22 A.M., Resident 53 indicated he had only received 2 showers in the last month and a half. He indicated the certified nursing assistants (CNAs) would offer to provide showers between 11 P.M. and 3 A.M. He indicated his preference was to clean up himself as he did not like being woken up at midnight to take a shower. A record review for Resident 53 was completed, on 8/9/2024 at 9:24 A.M., Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus type 2, cannabis use, chronic kidney disease, and iron deficiency anemia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated, 8/9/2024, indicated Resident 53 was cognitively intact. An MDS assessment, dated 5/17/2024, indicated it was very important for him to choose between a tub bath, shower,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement an indiviualized activities program for 1 of 3 Residents reviewed for activities. (Resident 1) Finding includes: During an observation, on 8/7/2024 at 10:08 A.M., Resident 1 was observed in his bed, awake. The television was not on and no music was playing. During an observation, on 8/7/2024 at 1:41 P.M., Resident 1 was observed in bed sleeping. The television was not on and no music was playing. During an observation, on 8/8/2024 at 10:30 A.M., Resident 1 was observed in his room, in a chair, awake. The television was not turned on and no music was playing. During an observation, on 8/9/2024 at 9:27 A.M., Resident 1 was observed in his bed, awake. The television was not on and no music was playing. During an observation, on 8/9/2024 at 11:04 A.M., the Director of Nursing entered Resident 1's room and told staff his television should be on. A record review for Resident 1 was completed on 8/9/2024 at 1:40 P.M., Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: cerebral palsy, epilepsy, gastrostomy status,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a residents' urostomy drainage bag was covered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urostomies. (Resident 264) Finding includes: During an observation, on 8/7/2024 at 3:10 P.M., Resident 264's urostomy drainage bag was on the floor with no dignity bag covering it. T. During an observation, on 8/8/2024 at 10:47 A.M., the resident's urostomy drainage bag had no dignity bag covering it. The record for Resident 264 was completed on 8/9/2024 at 9:00 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, spina bifida, depression, paraplegia, morbid obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, stoma of urinary tract, and colostomy status. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/9/2024, was only partially completed by the date of the record review. Resident 264's baseline care plan, dated 8/3/2024, included, but was not limited to, check tubing for kinks each shift/per policy, monitor and document intake and output as per facility policy, and observe for and document pain/discomfort due to catheter. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper labeling and storage of respiratory equipment and provide necessary respiratory services according to physician orders for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 30, 46, and 215). Findings include: 1. During an observation on 8/7/2024, at 2:28 P.M., Resident 30 was being administered 4 liters (L) of oxygen via a nasal cannula (NC). The oxygen tubing was un-dated and without humidification. On 8/8/2024, at 10:51 A.M., Resident 30's oxygen tubing was not dated and without humidification. During an interview, on 8/8/2024, at 2:10 P.M. QMA 10 indicated the oxygen tubing should have a written date taped to the tubing indicating when the tubing had last been changed that the tubing QMA 10 indicated the resident refused humidification as the humidity bothered the resident. On 8/9/2024, at 2:45 P.M., during an interview, the DON indicated the oxygen tubing should have been dated. A record review for Resident 30 was completed on 8/9/2024 at 9:00 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure narcotics were counted and documented every shift for 1 of 4 narcotic count log books reviewed. (Freedom cart 1) Finding includes: A Medication Storage observation of the Freedom hall medication cart was completed, on 8/9/2024 at 10:40 A.M., with QMA 2. The narcotic log book lacked signatures on 8/3/2024 to show a narcotic count was completed. During an interview, on 8/9/2024 at 10:46 A.M.,QMA 2 indicated the narcotic log sheets should have been signed every shift. On 8/13/2024 at 10:39 A.M., the Director of Nursing provided the policy titled, Controlled Substance,undated, and indicated the policy was the one currently used by the facility. The policy indicated .9. Nursing staff must count controlled medications at the end of each shift. The nurse coming on duty and thru nurse going off duty must make the count together 3.1-25(e)(2) 3.1-25(e)(3)
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately, had resident labels, and medication carts were free of loose pills for 2 of 2 medication carts observed.(Freedom medication carts 1 and 2) Findings include: 1. During a medication storage observation, on 8/9/2024 at 9:22 A.M., with QMA 2 on Freedom hall med cart 1, the following was observed: - 1 box of Xalanta eye drops was stored with injectable medications. - A bottle of Colace (stool softener) pills had no resident identifier/label. - An opened bottle of Antacid tablets had no resident identifier/label. During an interview, on 8/9/2024 at 10:46 A.M., QMA 2 indicated the medications should have been labeled, and the eye drops should have been separated from the injectable medications. 2. During a medication storage observation, on 8/9/2024 at 10:50 A.M., with LPN 3 on Freedom hall medication cart 2, the following was observed: -3 loose pills in 2 drawers. - A bottle of Derma Klenze (wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-28 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure bedtime snacks were offered consistently for residents after the evening meal on 4 of 4 halls. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 61 of 62 residents who consumed food in the facility. (Independence, Freedom, Liberty and Heritage) Finding includes: The posted meal times for the facility indicated breakfast was served between 7:40 A.M. and 8:15 A.M. and the evening meal was served between 4:40 A.M. and 5:15 P.M., which indicated a timelapse of over 14 hours inbetween the two meals. Observations and interviews, were conducted on 11/27/2023 between 7:45 P.M. and 8:15 P.M., and indicated the following: - During an interview with CNA 2, who was working on the Independence and Freedom hall, she indicated she sometimes had snacks to pass. CNA 2 opened the clean utility room on the Freedom hall and pointed to an empty plastic tray and empty plastic bin and stated, It looks like we do not have any snacks tonight. She opened the cupboards around the counter with the plastic bin and tray but there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a timely notice of discharge was issued for a facility initiated discharge for 1 of 3 discharged residents reviewed. (Resident B) Finding includes: The record for Resident B was reviewed on 10/13/2023 at 9:45 A.M. Resident B was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included, but not limited to: type 1 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis with coma, open wound of the lower left leg with subsequent encounter, Crohn's disease of the large intestine without complications, hyperlipidemia, calculus of lower urinary tract, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet and pain. On 9/18/2023 at 12:03 P.M., a Social Service Progress Note from the Social Service Director (SSD) indicated the staff member had spoken with the resident about his discharge from the facility. The resident informed the SSD he was going to talk with some family members in hopes they would take him in. The SSD and resident called the Social Security office and the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the spice cabinet and range/oven were free of food debris and grease build-up, failed to dispose of expired foods, and failed to label and date opened foods for 1 of 1 kitchen. This had the potential to affect 53 of 53 residents who ate their food in the kitchen. Findings include: During an initial observation of the main kitchen, on 8/6/2023 at 9:36 A.M., the following was observed: -A 25-pound bag of flour opened, and leaking flour onto the floor. -A plastic bag with 3 meat patties with solidified grease were in a Ziplock bag unlabeled and undated in the walk-in cooler. -A tubular lunch meat product with plastic wrap not adhered to the used end of the product was not dated, and had a hardened appearance around the edges. -2 pre-packaged bags of chopped lettuce with a best by date of 7/26/2023 were rotten in appearance with notable brownness. -4-pound salt with no open date. -18-ounce pepper with no open date. -5.5-ounce dill weed with no open date. -6-pound garlic powder with no open date. -7-ounce…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update resident care plans for falls and skin issue for 2 of 26 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Resident 29 & B) Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 8/6/2023 at 11:43 A.M. Resident 29's family indicated she had a fall recently and fell flat on her face. A record review was completed, on 8/8/2023 at 9:45 A.M. Resident 29's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: hypertension dementia, arthritis and osteoarthritis. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 6/12/2023, indicated Resident 29 required extensive assist of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers dressing, and toilet use and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. A Nurses Note, dated 7/20/2023 at 10:22 P.M., indicated the QMA on the hall informed the nurse the resident had fallen in her room. CNA went to other room to care for resident. The resident was sleeping, woke up and walking in the room and fell and hit right side of face above the right eye. The resident was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$105,073 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 3 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $105,073 — penalty dated 2024-08-13
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-22 for 27 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-12 for 1 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-10 for 36 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to IDE MANAGEMENT GROUP — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIBC BANK USA | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | since 11/01/2020 |
| BORNE-BAUMAN, CANDICE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2019 |
| FLUECKIGER, RUSSELL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2012 |
| LEHMAN, SCOTT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/14/2020 |
| MACKLIN, LARRY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2012 |
| MCINTIRE, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2019 |
| ADAMS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2012 |
| WARSAW MEADOWS NURSING AND REHAB LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2020 |
| JACKSON, NATHAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/03/2022 |
| OFFERLE, ANDREW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2021 |
| SMITH, SCOTT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2022 |
| SPRUNGER, KYLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2018 |
| WHEELER, DANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2012 |
| GREATOREX, TINA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/02/2026 |
| SCHIOWITZ, MARC | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/02/2026 |
| SEBBAG, GABRIEL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/02/2026 |
| 300 PRARIE PROPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2020 |
| ADVANCED CARE CONSULTANTS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2022 |
| BLUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2020 |
| FIRST BANK OF BERNE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2020 |
| JSJ HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/02/2026 |
| LME FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2020 |
| MIDWEST IN OPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/02/2026 |
| SAMARA FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2020 |
| SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $981K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155566. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.