Cloverleaf Of Knightsville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 35.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 78.2 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe administration of peritoneal dialysis (a home-based treatment for kidney failure that uses the lining of the abdomen to filter waste and extra fluid from the blood) by staff trained and qualified to administer peritoneal dialysis for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for peritoneal dialysis (Resident 2). Findings include:During an interview, on 2/10/26 at 10:41 a.m., Resident 2 indicated he was on peritoneal dialysis and staff would place him on the dialysis in the evening and would remove it around 8 to 8:30 a.m. the next morning. Resident 2's record was reviewed on 2/12/26 at 3:09 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease (the final permanent stage of chronic kidney disease where kidneys function less than 15% of normal capacity, requiring dialysis or transplant for survival) and dependence on renal dialysis (indicates a chronic, life-sustaining need for mechanical blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dementia (a decline in mental ability such as memory, reasoning, and communication) residents' person-centered specific care needs were communicated to facility staff for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for dementia care (Residents 45 and 8). Findings include:1. Resident 45's record was reviewed on 2/10/26 at 2:12 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease with late onset (a progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory, thinking skills, and eventually the ability to perform daily tasks, with symptoms worsening over time) and dementia with mood disturbance (the emotional changes and behavioral shifts that occur in people with dementia, often resulting from brain damage). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/28/26, indicated the resident had severe cognitive deficit. A care plan, dated 5/31/25 and revised on 1/16/26, indicated the resident had a diagnosis of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  A. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain separation between clean and soiled cleaning mops and cleaning linens for 1 of 1 observation of the laundry room. This practice had the potential to affect 83 of 83 residents residing at the facility. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure they wore gloves during an injection administration and failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed during medication administration for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident 61 and 26). Findings include:A. On 2/13/26 at 2:00 p.m., during initial observation of the laundry area with the Infection Prevention (IP) nurse and the Director of Nursing (DON), observed clean mopheads and cleaning linens stored on a shelf in the soiled laundry room next to the washing machine. In addition, cleaning linen items were stored on top of a plastic crate with cans of chemicals inside of crate next to the washer. On 2/13/26 at 2:05 p.m., during an interview the IP nurse indicated she had not noticed the clean…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were addressed in a dignified manner and the facility failed to ensure a resident was assisted during meal service in a dignified manner for 2 of 3 dining observations. (Residents 56 and 31). Findings include: 1. During the lunch meal observation in the activity dining room, on 12/12/24 at 12:41 p.m., Resident 56 was sitting at a table eating her lunch when CNA 5 addressed the resident as Honey. CNA 5 stated from the opposite table, Honey use your silverware to Resident 56. Resident 56's record was reviewed, on 12/16/24 at 1:48 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, severe, with anxiety (a person who is experiencing a significant level of cognitive decline where the exact type of dementia is not known, and alongside this cognitive impairment, they are also exhibiting symptoms of anxiety) and cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (a stroke (cerebral infarction) has occurred in the right hemisphere of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor a resident's weight as ordered for 1 of 4 reviewed for nutrition (Resident 59). Finding includes: During an interview, on 12/12/24 at 11:14 a.m., Resident 59 indicated he had some weight loss when he first came to the facility, but he thought his weight had stabilized now. Resident 59's record was reviewed on 12/17/24 at 10:18 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease, stage 3 (a person has moderate damage to their kidneys where they are not filtering waste effectively, resulting in mild to moderate loss of kidney function), prediabetes (you have a higher-than-normal blood sugar), and repeated falls. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/22/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had an admission weight of 210 pounds. A care plan, dated 11/20/24, indicated the resident was at risk for nutritional deficits related to chronic kidney disease stage 3 and prediabetes. Interventions included, but were not limited to,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into the bladder through the urethra to drain urine), drainage bag and tubing were maintained in a manner to prevent contact with the floor for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident 1). Findings include: During the initial pool observation, on 12/13/24 at 8:50 a.m., Resident 1 was observed in her bed and the bed was in the low position. Her indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag (catheter bag) was observed in contact with the floor. At the same time, the catheter's tubing was observed sitting on the electrical cord for the resident's oxygen concentrator (a medical device that supplies oxygen-enriched air by removing nitrogen from the air around the patient). The electrical cord was observed in contact with the floor. During a random observation, on 12/13/24 at 3:10 p.m., the resident was observed in her bed. The bed was observed in the low position. The resident's catheter bag was observed to be in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to assess a resident's condition for complications before and after hemodialysis treatments (a procedure that removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly) which were received at a certified dialysis facility for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident 49). Findings include: On 12/12/24 at 11:34 a.m., during observation and interview, Resident 49 indicated when she received hemodialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The staff did not check the access site (also known as vascular access, a surgically created opening in the body that allows a patient to receive hemodialysis) in her left arm after returning from dialysis treatment. She indicated when she returned yesterday 12/11/24, the access site bled and soaked through the bandage on her arm. She indicated she changed the bandage using the supplies she had in her room. On 12/13/24 at 3:30 p.m., during observation after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring was completed for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 30). Findings include: Resident 30's record was reviewed on 12/16/24 at 9:36 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver with ascities (a condition where the liver is damaged by chronic alcohol consumption and has a buildup of fluid in the abdomen), visual hallucinations (seeing things that are not there), other chorea (a movement disorder that causes involuntary, rapid, and irregular muscle contractions that affect the face, arms, legs, and trunk), anxiety disorder (a mental health condition that causes excessive and persistent feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness that interfere with daily life), major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that can cause a persistent feeling of sadness, hopelessness, and a lack of interest in activities), and irregular muscle contractions that affect the face, arms, legs, and trunk. A quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent with an error rate of 21.43 percent for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration (Residents 169, 14 and 26). Findings include: 1. On 12/17/24 at 7:45 a.m., observed Registered Nurse (RN) 15, prepare and administer medications to Resident (169). Ferrous Sulfate 1 tablet and Klor-Con 1 tablet were removed from medication card and crushed. Medications were then administered to the resident in applesauce. On 12/17/24 at 9:30 a.m., the medical records of Resident 169 were reviewed. The resident was admitted with diagnosis including but not limited to anemia (a condition that develops when your blood produces a lower-than-normal amount of healthy red blood cells) and hypokalemia (a condition where the level of potassium in your blood is lower than normal). Physician orders included but not limited to administer 1 tablet ferrous sulfate EC (enteric coated) (tablets or capsules with a coating that prevents the medication from dissolving in the stomach and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medication were labeled properly for 3 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (Residents 58, 26, and 2). Findings include: On 12/17/25 at 8:00 a.m., medication storage cart A was observed. Tresiba Insulin pen prescribed for Resident 2. Pharmacy dispensed date was 11/14/24. Date opened was not indicated on the insulin pen. On 12/17/24 at 8:20 a.m., medication storage cart 1 was observed. Lantus Insulin pen prescribed for Resident 58. Pharmacy dispensed date was 11/19/24. Date opened was not indicated on the insulin pen. On 12/17/24 at 9:00 a.m., medication storage cart B was observed. Basaglar Insulin pen prescribed for Resident 26. Pharmacy dispensed date was 11/28/24. Date opened was not indicated on the insulin pen. On 12/17/24 at 8:05 a.m., during interview Registered Nurse (RN) 15 indicated insulin pens should be dated when opened and an expiration date added to label. On 12/17/24 at 9:05 a.m., during interview Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 18 indicated insulin pens should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IDE MANAGEMENT GROUP — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN