Yorktown Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 77.0 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse to the State Agency (Indiana Department of Health) when the staff member was alleged to have slapped the resident's hand to take her bed controller from her for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident D and CNA 1) Findings include:Resident D's clinical record was reviewed on 6/2/26 at 10:22 a.m. Diagnoses included Pick's Disease, anxiety disorder, dementia, bipolar disorder, and early onset Alzheimer's disease. The most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/22/26, indicated Resident D was moderately cognitively impaired.Confidential interviews were conducted during the survey. During a confidential interview, Employee 2 indicated they were told CNA 1 had slapped Resident D. Employee 2 could not remember who told them about the incident or exactly when it occurred. During an interview, on 6/1/26 at 12:50 p.m., Resident D indicated CNA 1 had slapped her on the back of the hand. The resident was attempting to adjust her bed with the controller.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving psychotropic medications was evaluated for either a gradual dose reduction (GDR) by the indicated prescriber or was determined to have an individualized clinical contraindication for GDR for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. (Resident 6)Finding includes: Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed on 9/5/25 at 10:54 a.m. Diagnoses included dementia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Current physician orders included quetiapine fumarate (antipsychotic medication) 300 milligram (mg) give one tab one time a day, sertraline (antidepressant) 100 mg give two tabs one time a day, buspirone (anti-anxiety medication) 15mg give 1 tab 2 times a day, divalproex sodium (anti-seizure medication) 500mg give 2 tablets one time a day, and No GDR of Psych Medications per Psychiatrist.Discontinued orders were reviewed concurrently and indicated doses of the above medications were not changed since 2023.A 5/29/25, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a prescribed therapeutic diet for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 7)Finding includes:The facility's weekly menus, provided after entrance conference, indicated mechanical soft diet offerings for lunch on 9/2/25 included ground ham steak, pureed cream corn, chopped Italian vegetables, soft dinner roll, assorted ice cream, milk, and coffee or hot tea.During an interview with [NAME] 9 while serving the lunch meal on 9/2/25 at 10:56 a.m., he indicated residents who received a mechanical soft diet could not have regular kernel corn and would be served creamed corn instead. During the interview, creamed corn was observed in a pan on the steam table.During a dining observation on 9/2/25 at 12:14 p.m., Resident 7's meal tray included an uncut piece of ham (the size of a digital camera), whole kernel corn, cooked carrots, and vegetable soup with crackers. During the meal, Resident 7 indicated she was on an altered diet that required her food to be pre-cut or ground-up and she was unable to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician's orders and delayed release medications were not opened for crushed administration for 2 of 3 residents observed for medication administration, resulting in a 10 % medication error rate. (Resident 47 and Resident 13) Findings include:1.During a medication administration observation on 9/4/25 at 9:17 a.m., LPN 8 administered one oral puff of fluticasone furoate-vilanterol inhalation aerosol powder (inhaler for respiratory conditions) to Resident 47. LPN 8 did not prompt the resident to rinse her mouth. nor did the resident rinse her mouth following administration. During an interview on 9/4/25 at 9:22 a.m., LPN 8 indicated she did not prompt the resident to rinse her mouth after administering the inhalation powder during the medication observation. She should have instructed the resident to rinse her mouth immediately after the medication was administered, for prevention of thrush (a fungal infection of the mouth), according to the physician's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed to ensure proper portions were served for 1 of 1 meal observed for following menus (10/7/24 Lunch). This deficient practice had the potential to impact 69 of 69 residents. Finding include: An undated facility document titled, Midwest Fall/Winter 2024-2025, provided by the facility following the entrance conference on 10/2/24, indicated lunch on October 7, 2024 was Baked Ziti with Meat sauce, Tossed Salad with Dressing, and Ice Cream. An undated facility document titled, Midwest Fall/Winter 2024-2025, Diet Spreadsheet Short Name Format, provided by the Certified Dietary Manager on 10/7/24 at 11:19 a.m., indicated the portion of baked ziti to be served to the residents was 6 ounces. During the lunch meal service observation on 10/7/24 from 10: 58 a.m. to 11:06 a.m. [NAME] 4 served a 4-ounce serving of baked pasta on 10 plates, which were placed in the meal service cart to be serve to the 200 hall. The cook indicated the trays were prepared and ready for service to the residents. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure shift to shift narcotic reconciliation was completed for 2 of 3 carts reviewed for medication storage. (300 hall cart and 100 hall cart) Findings include: 1. During a medication storage observation of the 300 hall cart, accompanied by RN 5, on 10/4/24 at 2:00 p.m., the Controlled Drugs- Count Record was reviewed and the following dates lacked signatures for shift to shift reconciliation of controlled substances: In October 2024- 10/1 on evening and night shifts, 10/2 on night shift, 10/3 on day and night shifts, 10/4 on day shift. In September 2024- 9/4 on evening shift, 9/14 on night shift. During an interview, at the time of the observation, RN 5 indicated the narcotic count was completed at the beginning and end of each shift. 2. During a review of the 100 hall cart Controlled Drugs- Count Record, provided by Medical Records on 10/4/24 at 3:00 p.m., the following dates lacked signatures for shift to shift reconciliation of controlled medications: In October 2024- 10/1 on day and night shifts, 10/2 on evening and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed during medication administration for 3 of 5 residents observed. (Resident 12, Resident 36, and Resident 50) Findings include: During a medication administration observation on 10/7/24, at 11:24 a.m., RN 5 removed medications for Resident 12 from the 300 Hall medication cart. Prior to removing medications, the RN did not perform hand hygiene. Three oral medications, one nasal spray, and one bottle of eye drops, were removed from the cart. RN 5 handed the medications and a cup of water to the resident. She donned clean gloves to administer the eye drops to the resident. On the way out of the room, the RN removed and disposed of the gloves. No hand hygiene was performed after glove removal or as she exited the room. On 10/7/24, at 11:30 a.m., RN 5 removed medications for Resident 50, including three oral medications. No hand hygiene was performed prior to removing the medications. The nurse handed the medications and a cup of water to the resident, watched as the resident took the medications,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promptly initiate wound treatment to promote healing of pressure injuries for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. (Resident B and C). Findings include: 1. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 6/10/24 at 9:45 a.m. Diagnoses included acute diastolic congestive heart failure, end stage renal disease, and pressure injury of right buttock, stage 3 (full thickness tissue loss). A Nursing Evaluation-(Admit/Readmit/Quarterly/COC), dated 3/14/24, indicated the resident had a skin tear to the sacrum measuring 6.0 centimeters (cm) length x 1.6 cm width x 0.1 cm depth, nearly the diameter of a tennis ball. An electronic mail (e-mail) message from the wound care company, dated 3/20/24 at 11:48 a.m. and provided by the DON, indicated Resident B was examined by the provider and had admitted to the facility with a pressure injury to the right buttock, stage 3. A Weekly Pressure Injury Evaluation, dated 3/20/24 at 1:53 p.m. indicated the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide follow care plan interventions for a dependent resident (Resident C) when a staff member (CNA 1) left the resident unsupervised in an elevated bed in a compromised position which resulted in a fall. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 2/20/24 at 10:21 a.m. Diagnoses include chronic congestive heart failure, stage 4 kidney, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, and restless leg syndrome. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/27/23, indicated the resident required substantial/maximum assistance for: dressing, bathing, toilet use, and transfers, and partial/moderate assistance for bed mobility. Review of the resident's Fall Risk Evaluations, dated 1/11/24, 1/12/24, and 1/20/24, indicated the resident was at high risk for falls. Review of a facility falls list, provided by the DON on 2/20/24 at 10:52 a.m., indicated the resident had sustained four falls from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure wound care was provided per physician order for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care. (Resident E) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 10/12/23 at 12:54 a.m. Diagnoses include orthopedic aftercare for surgical amputation, diabetes type 2, dementia, and nutritional deficiency. Review of the physician orders indicated to cover left below the knee amputation site incision with 4x4 gauze, wrap stump with roll bandage, then wrap with an elastic bandage, once daily (10/12/23). During an observation with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/12/23 at 12:12 p.m., Resident E was sitting up in a wheelchair in their room. Their left leg stump area was wrapped in an elastic bandage. The DON removed the elastic bandage from the resident's left leg surgical site stump. Upon removal of the elastic bandage, no gauze dressing was observed on the incision. The DON indicated the incision site should have had a dressing under the elastic bandage, per physician order. The resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IDE MANAGEMENT GROUP — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $924K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN