Arkansas City Presbyterian Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 46.8 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 46 residents with one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to prevent the potential for food borne illness and decreased palatability. This puts the residents at risk for illness and weight loss. Findings included: During an initial tour of the resident kitchen on 08/11/25 at 09:05 AM, the following areas of concern were noted in the freezer:Two Ziplock bags of hamburger patties were unsealed, and the bag was wide open, exposing the contents to air.A Ziplock bag of chicken strips was unsealed, and the bag was wide open, exposing the contents to air.A Ziplock bag of potato wedges was unsealed, and the bag was wide open, exposing the contents to air.During the subsequent tour of the kitchen on 08/12/25 at 09:30 AM, two of the four cutting boards had deep grooves and scratches. The other two had multiple scratches.On 08/11/25 at 09:05 AM, Dietary Staff BB stated he was aware that items in the freezer should be sealed to avoid freezer burn. He immediately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 46 residents. The sample included 16 residents, which included seven residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M assisted a cognitively impaired resident, Resident (R) 46, with locomotion in the hallway without the use of wheelchair pedals. This deficient practice placed R46 at risk for accidents.Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R46 had diagnoses which included dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), long-term use of anticoagulants (a class of medications used to prevent the blood from clotting), and generalized muscle weakness.R46's 02/14/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The assessment documented R46 utilized a wheelchair and/or walker for locomotion and required setup assistance to wheel 50 feet with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the delivery of laundry to the residents' rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to the cross-contamination and spread of communicable diseases to the residents of the facility.Findings included:On 08/11/25 at 10:35 AM, Laundry V and Laundry W were observed delivering laundry to three resident rooms. Laundry V and Laundry W did not perform hand hygiene before they entered the residents' rooms or after they exited the residents' rooms. On 08/11/25 at 10:37 AM, Laundry V and Laundry W stated they were informed by a former supervisor that hand hygiene between resident rooms stopped when the COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory virus) pandemic ended. On 08/11/25 at 10:40 AM, Housekeeping U revealed the facility's expectation was that hand hygiene should be performed with alcohol based hand rub (ABHR - isopropyl alcohol hand sanitizer) when going from one resident's room to another, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 37 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store foods safely and in sanitary conditions due to the staff failure to date and properly seal food items and removal of undated bread items to prevent the possible spread of food borne illness. Findings included: - On 03/04/24 at 08:20 AM during the initial tour of the kitchen, and follow-up tour on 03/05 at 12:35 PM with dietary staff D, revealed the following areas of concern: The Kitchen refrigerator: There were 17 facility made Sugar free health shakes that lacked a prepared date. There were 19 facility made thawed health shakes that lacked dates when pulled from the freezer. One hamburger patty in the freezer in an open bag that lacked a date. One bag of opened chicken bites that lacked an opened date. One bag of opened broccoli that lacked an opened date. One bag of opened carrots that lacked an opened date. In addition, the tour of the facility revealed a loaf of bread with no use by date on the rolls, and one bag with mold on the rolls. One bag of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility census totaled 37 residents with 12 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe sanitary environment for two Residents (R)13 and R19, related to incontinent cares, to prevent spread possible infections in the facility. Findings include: - Observation on 03/05/24 at 01:20 PM, revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C and CNA F ambulated R13 to her room and took her into the bathroom. The resident stood in front of the toilet and held onto CNA F's arms while CNA C donned gloves and took R13's pants down and removed the resident's brief. After R13 finished toileting, CNA C touched the container of disposable wet wipes from the back of the toilet, obtained some disposable wipes, and provided perineal care to the resident. CNA C placed a dry brief on the resident. CNA F stood the resident up, pulled her clean brief and pants back up. Both staff removed their gloves and ambulated the resident back to the TV commons area. Staff failed to perform hand hygiene or glove change after the removal of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 42 residents with twelve selected for review including two residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide perineal cares after urinary incontinence in a sanitary manner and toilet one of the residents, Resident (R)33, who required antibiotic treatment for a urinary tract infection, per her toileting schedule. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) under the diagnosis tab, for Resident (R)33 included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) and history of urinary tract infections. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed R33 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of four, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She rejected care one to three days of the seven-day assessment period. She required extensive assist of one staff for toileting. R33 had a trial of a toileting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · C2025-08-13 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to display accurate and identifiable staffing information, which contained the actual nursing hours worked, for the 46 residents who resided in the facility. Findings included:- Review of the facility's Daily Nurse Staffing Report from 07/10/25 through 08/10/25 revealed the actual hours worked had not been completed on the daily nurse staffing report.On 08/13/25 at 10:00 AM, Administrative Nurse D confirmed the actual hours worked were not completed on the daily staffing sheets, as required. The facility policy for Daily Nurse Staffing Report, revised 02/03/25, included: At the beginning of each shift, the form shall identify the actual shift hours expected to be worked by licensed and unlicensed staff directly responsible for resident care.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $655K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS