Parsons Presbyterian Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 29.1 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.18 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.80 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.24 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 29 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the significant medication error of cognitively impaired Resident (R) 1. On 09/12/24 Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R incorrectly administered another resident's (R2's) medications to R1, which included Crestor (anti-hyperlipidemic) 20 milligram (mg) and Coreg (anti-hypertensive) 25 mg, as well as R1's scheduled mirtazapine (anti-depressant) 15 mg. The health care provider advised (HCP) to transport the resident to the Emergency Department (ED) via Emergency Medical Services (EMS) due to R1's life-threatening hypotension (low blood pressure) which occurred within an hour and a half hour of the medication error. While waiting for the facility van to arrive at the front of the facility to take R1 to the ED, R1 began to tremor (shaking or trembling movement), and her eyes rolled in different directions. The nursing staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents with 14 selected for review, which included two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)76 and R4 received timely interventions for pressure ulcer prevention, which resulted in R76's development of an unstageable pressure ulcer (unable to determine depth of the ulcer due to overlying slough (dead tissue usually yellow or white) or eschar (dried dead tissue). Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)76's Physician Order Sheet, dated 12/09/22, included diagnoses of femur (thigh bone) fracture, Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), anxiety, and arteriosclerotic (blood vessel hardening and narrowing) heart disease. The resident admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a stop date for an as needed (PRN) antianxiety medication for Resident (R)2 and R5's lorazepam (an antianxiety medication). Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R2's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. She received antianxiety medication (a class of medications that calm and relax people) during the assessment period. R2's Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 03/02/2026, documented she had a diagnosis of anxiety and took antianxiety medication. R2's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented she had a BIMS score of 14, indicating intact cognition. She received antianxiety medication during the assessment period. R2's Care Plan, revised 03/15/2026,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 31 with a written notification of transfer to the resident and/or his representative as soon as practicable and failed to send a copy of that notification to the ombudsman. Findings included:- R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of left femur fracture and cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). R31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R31 had a BIMS of 15, indicating intact cognition. R31's Discharge MDS, dated 03/18/2026, documented R31 had an unplanned discharge on [DATE]. R31's Health Status Note, dated 03/17/2026 at 04:07 PM, documented R31's daughter requested to have R31's medications and laundry ready to discharge the next day. R31's Health Status Note, dated 03/18/2026 at 01:17 PM, documented R31's family took R31 home with her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming opportunities related to shaving of facial hair to maintain good personal hygiene and dignity for Resident (R)3. Findings included:- Review of R3's Physician Orders (POS), dated 05/01/2026, included diagnoses of vascular dementia (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), self-care care deficit, and major depressive disorder (MDD-major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness). R3's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating moderate cognition impairment. She reported choosing her type of bath was very important. The resident was dependent on staff for bathing and personal hygiene. She did not exhibit behaviors of rejection of care. The Functional Abilities (Self Care and mobility) Care Area Assessment, (CAA), dated 03/11/2026, documented the resident had diagnoses that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform restorative care for Resident (R) 6 who had a contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) to her right hand. Findings included: - R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body). R6's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. She had a limitation in range of motion (ROM) on one side of her upper and lower extremities. R6 did not receive restorative nursing care (care provided to maintain a person's highest level of physical, mental, and psychosocial function in order to prevent declines that impact quality of life) during the assessment period. R6's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 04/14/2026, documented the resident required staff assistance with ADLs due to left sided…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and/or dispose of garbage and refuse properly in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests. Findings included: - On 09/10/24 at 10:13 AM, initial tour with Dietary Staff BB revealed two of four compartments dumpster open with exposed trash and garbage. Additionally, discarded building supplies surrounded the dumpster with grass grown over the edges. Dietary Staff BB confirmed the above findings. She reported the facility staff should dispose of garbage and trash in a closed container to prevent harboring of pests and rodents from nesting around the facility. Dietary Staff BB stated the staff facility used the dumpsters and they should keep all compartment lid closed to contain the garbage and trash when placed in the dumpster. On 09/12/24 at 11:15 AM, during environmental tour with Housekeeping and Maintenance Director U and Consultant GG, revealed the trash dumpster lacked one lid which exposed trash and garbage. The building…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) with complete and accurate direct staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS (i.e. Payroll Base Journal (PBJ), related to licensed nursing staffing information, when the facility failed to accurately report 24 hour per day Licensed Nurse coverage on 12 dates between 07/01/23 and 09/30/23 and 10 dates between 01/01/24 and 03/31/24. Findings Included: - Review of the Payroll Base Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for Fiscal year (FY), Quarter 4, 2023 (07/01/23 and 09/30/23) revealed a lack of License Nurse (LN) for 24 hours/seven days a week 24 hour/day on the following dates: On 07/01/23 , Saturday (SA), On 07/02/23, Sunday (SU), On 07/15/23, SA, On 07/22/23, SA, On 07/23/23, SU, On 08/12/23, SA, On 08/13/23, SU, On 08/19/23, SA, On 08/20/23, SU, On 09/03/23, SU On 09/23/23, SA, and On 09/24/23, SU.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 28 residents with 13 residents sampled, which included one resident sampled for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to report an allegation of staff to resident, verbal abuse (the use of oral, language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or within their hearing distance regardless of their age ability to comprehend, or disability) related to calling Resident (R)4 lazy in the presence of another resident. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)4's Physician Orders, dated 08/01/24, documentation included diagnoses of diabetes (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), heart failure, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), morbid obesity (severely overweight), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), osteoarthritis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 28 residents, with 13 residents sampled which included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation to determine causes and contributing factors related to a skin tear and failed to implement appropriate immediate interventions to prevent further skin tear for Resident (R)18. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)18's Physician Orders, dated 08/01/24, documentation included diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with psychotic disturbances (gross impairment in reality perception), dizziness, and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He exhibited continuous altered level of consciousness and fluctuating disorganized thinking. The resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 28 residents with 13 selected for review, which included four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving device was in working order for one Resident (R)21, of the four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)21's medical record revealed diagnoses that included diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), polyneuropathy (disorder of many of the nerves outside of the brain and spinal cord), venous ulcers (sores due to poor circulation), and stage two pressure ulcer (partial thickness skin loss into but no deeper than the dermis including intact or ruptured blisters). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated normal cognitive function. The resident required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 28 residents, with 13 residents sampled which included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a safe transfer for dependent (R)18 using a sit to stand lift related to the lack of use of the sling's safety belt to ensure the resident's safe transfer. Finding included: - Review of Resident (R)18's Physician Orders, dated 08/01/24, documentation included diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with psychotic disturbances (gross impairment in reality perception), dizziness, and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He exhibited continuous altered level of consciousness and fluctuating disorganized thinking. The resident had no functional limitation in range of motion in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,433 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-09-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $496K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS