Salina Presbyterian Manor
2601 E Crawford Street, Salina, KS 67401 · Non profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (785) 825-1366 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 4 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $51,438 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-27)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 35.1% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 4.9% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.8% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 28.1% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.0% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.4% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.2% | 18.1% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 66.7% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 16.2% | 22.4% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 28.5% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.40 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.95 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 139 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 58.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.0%CMS range 37.4–51.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 6.9–14.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 54.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 44.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 4.1–10.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 53.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.99 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.93 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.24 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a fall with serious injury for Resident (R) 1, who was at high risk for falls, received an anticoagulant (a class of medications used to prevent the blood from clotting), and required assistance with activities of daily living. On [DATE], Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M assisted R1 into the bathroom in his room, sat R1 on the toilet, then left R1 alone in the bathroom. CNA M alerted Licensed Nurse (LN) G that R1 was in the bathroom. At 10:55 AM, CNA N entered R1's room and found R1 on the floor of the bathroom. R1 had hematoma (a collection of blood trapped in the tissues of the skin or in an organ, resulting from trauma) on the right side of his head. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) transported R1 to the hospital, where he was diagnosed with a subarachnoid bleed (a serious condition, typically caused by head injury, where blood collects between the skull and the surface of the brain). R1 died on [DATE] in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 56 residents with three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1, R2, and R3 remained free from abuse. On 12/17/24 at 05:00 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N received a report from R1 that CNA M had shoved her hard into the wall when turning to change her and slapped her buttocks. During the night shift, LN G removed CNA M from another hall, due to the mistreatment of R2 and R3. R2 stated CNA M would not listen to her about a transfer and hurt her arm during the transfer, which caused her to have tremors. R3 stated that CNA M came into his room, throwing and slamming things around, and would not provide him assistance to the bathroom. This deficient practice placed R1, R2, and R3 at risk for negative psychosocial impact including fear, anxiety, and neglect. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 3 received quality treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. On 04/27/26, Licensed Nurse (LN) G failed to follow wound vac (a vacuum-assisted wound treatment that applies gentle suction to a wound to help it heal) treatment orders for the treatment of R3's third, fourth and fifth right toe amputations (surgical removal of a body part), which caused R3's surgical wound to worsen and require intravenous (IV-administered directly into the bloodstream via a vein) antibiotic administration. Findings included:- R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R3 had diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease (PVD- slow and progressive circulation disorder causing narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel), osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow) of the right foot, and surgical aftercare for amputation of the third, fourth, and fifth toes. R3's admission Minimum Data Set, dated 04/06/26, documented R3 had a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 2 received the necessary care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent a pressure injury from developing when staff failed to identify and implement preventative measures such as heel offloading or repositioning to address R2's risk for pressure risk related to friction and shear and very limited ability to reposition. This failure resulted in an unstageable pressure injury unstageable (depth of the wound is unknown due to the wound bed being covered by a thick layer of other tissue and pus). Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented he admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR documented diagnoses of displaced fracture of the base of the neck of the right femur (right hip fracture), artificial right hip joint replacement, heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 58 residents with three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to identify risk for burns and provide adequate supervision to prevent accidental hot liquid burns for Resident (R) 1 and R2. On 10/07/24 at approximately 12:30 PM, R1 ate lunch in the dining room. R1 required staff assistance with eating and drinking. R1 took the plastic wrap off the coffee on his tray, lifted it towards his mouth, and lost control of the coffee cup, spilling hot coffee on his right thigh. R1 sustained a second-degree burn (potentially painful burn that affects the first and second layers of the skin) to his right thigh. On 12/03/24 at approximately 05:30 PM, Student Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) GG took R2's supper tray to R2's room and placed the tray on the bedside table. Student CNA GG attempted to adjust the height of the bedside table and instead pressed the latch that tilted the bedside table, causing hot tomato soup and hot coffee to land on R2's left thigh causing a burn to R2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 53 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff possessed current licensure as required. This deficient practice placed all the residents in the facility at risk for not attaining or maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings included:- The Kansas Nurse Aide Registry, printed on [DATE], documented Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R license expired on [DATE] and CMA S license expired on [DATE].The Facility's Working Schedule for the month of [DATE] documented CMA R worked six days in the facility and passed medications to residents after CMA R's license had expired. CMA R was suspended and taken off the schedule until her license was reinstated.The Facility's Working Schedule for the month of [DATE] documented CMA S worked two days in the facility and passed medications to residents after CMA S's license had expired. CMA S was suspended and taken off the schedule until her license was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 53 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate administrative oversight when the facility failed to monitor and ensure all nursing staff practicing in the facility maintained active licenses as required to provide the residents residing in the facility with the care they needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice placed the residents residing in the facility at risk for a lack of quality nursing care.Findings included:- The Kansas Nurse Aide Registry, printed on [DATE], documented Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R license expired on [DATE] and CMA S license expired on [DATE].The Facility's Working Schedule for the month of [DATE] documented CMA R worked six days in the facility and passed medications to residents after CMA R's license had expired. CMA R was suspended and taken off the schedule until her license was reinstated.The Facility's Working…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 56 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions for the 56 residents in the facility, who receive their food from the kitchen. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 06/24/25 at 07:45 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, the handles and door surfaces of the four-door refrigerator were sticky and had dried food substances on them. The ceiling tile above the food preparation table had dried, red in color, food splatter. On 06/25/25 at 10:15 AM, the char broiler (a type of cooking appliance, typically used in commercial kitchens, that uses dry heat to cook food over a grill or grate) had blackish greasy buildup and dried food stuck to the grill. Dietary BB stated they did not use the char broiler but used the outside grill. The knobs of the char broiler were greasy and had food substances dried on them. Further observation revealed the small…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the blood), and acute pyelonephritis (infection of the kidneys). R30's EMR documented she was discharged to a hospital on [DATE] to 03/17/25 and again on 04/30/25 to 05/07/25. Upon request, the facility lacked documentation the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) had been notified of the discharges from the facility. On 06/25/25 at 02:30 PM, Social Services Staff X verified she had not notified the LTCO of the March 2025 and April 2025 discharges to a hospital. She stated she only notified the ombudsman of the monthly admissions and discharges to home or another facility. The facility's Transfer/Discharge Notice policy, dated 02/03/25, stated the facility would notify the resident or their responsible party of all discharges or transfers 30 days prior to the transfer unless the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 56 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label Resident (R)158 and R37s' insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) flex pens when initially opened for use and when expired. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included: - On [DATE] at 08:05 AM, observation of R158's medication cabinet located on the wall in his room revealed R158's Tresiba (long-acting insulin) flex pen was not labeled with an opened date or an expired date. On [DATE] at 08:15 AM, License Nurse H verified that the nurses should label and date the insulin flex pens with the date opened. On [DATE] at 10:00 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified that the nurse should label and date the insulin flex pens with the date opened. Medlineplus.gov directs that open, unrefrigerated Tresiba can be used within 56 days; after that time, they must be discarded. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 56 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when providing care with close contact to residents with an open wound or an indwelling device. This deficient practice placed all residents at risk for infection. Findings included: - Resident (R) 40's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and obesity (excessive body fat). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R40 required moderate staff assistance for toileting, dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 56 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with one reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide dignity and quality of life for Resident (R) 159, by having an uncovered urinary collection leg bag visible to guests and other residents. This placed the residents at risk for embarrassment and an undignified living environment. Findings included: - R159's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), urinary tract infection (UTI - an infection in any part of the urinary system), and gout (inflammation of the joints.) R159's EMR documented, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R159's Care Plan dated 06/20/25, documented the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid). R159's EMR lacked a Physician Order for the Foley catheter. On 06/24/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 56 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor physician-ordered blood pressures for one resident, Resident (R) 19, which placed the resident at risk for adverse effects related to medication and physical decline. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R19 documented diagnoses of hypertensive chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition characterized by the gradual and progressive loss of kidney function over time) stage four, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R19 had moderately impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff used contaminated gloves to transfer food items from one container to another while preparing the four residents pureed diets, failed to use gloves when cutting and handling food items, and failed to ensure clean and sanitary food prep areas. This placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 10/25/.23 at 10:15 AM, observation revealed, during preparation of the pureed diets, Dietary Staff (DS) BB washed hands, applied gloves, then touched the food prep counter (with food particles and clear liquid on it). DS BB then used her contaminated gloved right hand to transfer cooked, cubed carrots from a container to the blender container. Further observation revealed DS BB, with the same contaminated gloves, retrieved a four ounce scoop from the hanging utensil device, and placed it on the same food prep counter. After…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-30 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee that met quarterly and had the required membership in attendance when the Medical Director (or designee) did not attend one quarterly meeting. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included: - The facility provided the signed QAA Committee attendance roster for 10/26/22, 01/18/23, 04/19/23, and 07/26/23. Review of the 01/18/23 roster revealed the Medical Director (or designee) did not attend. On 10/30/23 at 03:10 PM, Administrative Nurse F verified the Medical Director had not been present for the QAA meeting. The facility's Quality Assurance Performance Plan policy, dated 09/01/23, documented the Administration of [NAME] Presbyterian Manor develops and leads our program with input from staff at all levels, family members, community members and resident's themselves. It…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 resident. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff had appropriate competencies and skill set to provide nursing related services to assure resident safety and to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This placed Resident (R) 40 at risk of injury during transfers and ongoing wound assessments and all residents at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included: - The Facility Assessment dated 08/25/23, documented the Interdisciplinary Team assessment was made considering the team members skill sets in regard to residents' acuity. Equipment along with specific staff education will be provided to meet a resident's need. Involvement of the Medical Director will be in place regarding the admission/continuing care assessment and discussion. On 10/30/23 at 11:05 AM, Administrative Nurse D provided three nursing staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 57 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility kitchen staff failed to provide food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance, when dietary staff failed to follow a recipe while preparing four residents' pureed diets. This placed the affected residents at risk for impaired nutrition. Findings included: - On 10/25/23 at 10:15 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB, with Dietary Manager (DM) DD overlooking, stated the facility had four residents with pureed diets, and one received double portions. DS BB placed five square pieces of lasagna in a blender container, blended to a consistency of pudding, then placed unmeasured portions of lasgna onto four divided plates using a spatula. Observation revealed DS BB took the blender container and lid to the three-sink area, rinsed the blender, and placed the blender and lid through each section of the sink. DS BB returned to the prep table, placed unmeasured cubes of cooked carrots into the blender, blended to consistency of pudding, and placed onto the divided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)31 or his representative with written information regarding the facility bed hold policy when R31 was transferred to the hospital. This placed R31 at risk for not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. Findings included: - R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses of urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system). R31's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R31 required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toilet use. R31 required staff supervision with locomotion on and off unit, personal hygiene, and eating. R31's Care Plan, revised 10/03/23, documented R31 had an indwelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R) 40 which addressed his edema and related needs. This placed the resident at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R40 documented diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), weakness, edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), other symptoms and signs with cognitive functions and awareness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R40 had intact cognition and required supervision and one staff assistance for transfers, ambulation, dressing, and toileting. The MDS further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 resident. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise Residents (R) 38's care plan to include fluid restriction quantities, which placed R38 at risk of complication related to hydration status, dialysis (procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) treatment and history of urinary tract infections (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system) due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R38 documented diagnosis of acute kidney failure, end stage renal failure (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), hydronephrosis (excess urine accumulation in the kidney that causes swelling), multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), history of UTI's, bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the blood), acidosis (excess acid in the body fluids), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (dysfunction of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary for one of the residents reviewed for discharge that included a completed recapitulation (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) of the resident's stay and post discharge plan for Resident (R) 57. This placed the resident at risk for receiving inadequate care and missed care opportunities. Findings included: - R57's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R57's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 09/12/23, documented R57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R57 required moderate staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, putting on and off footwear, supervision with lower body dressing, and was independent with eating, oral hygiene, and toileting. The MDS documented R57…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with four reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 40 had his physician-ordered compression socks on to his legs daily due to his edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues). This placed the resident at risk for complications from edema. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R40 documented diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), weakness, edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), other symptoms and signs with cognitive functions and awareness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R40 had intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions placed to prevent, or promote healing of pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) for Resident (R)1 when the facility failed to implement the pressure reducing cushion as directed by R1's plan of care and R1 developed a Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss into but no deeper than the dermis including intact or ruptured blisters) pressure injury to the coccyx (area at the base of the spine) area. This also placed the resident at risk for further unhealed pressure injuries, pain and infection. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with nine reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a safe environment, free from preventable accident hazards, for three sampled residents who had falls, Resident (R) 26, R40, and R41. This placed the resident's at risk for further falls and injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R26 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) falls, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), hypertension (high blood pressure), hereditary neuropathy (weakness, numbness and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet), and insomnia (inability to sleep). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R26 had severely impaired cognition, and required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 1 with sanitary indwelling urinary catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) care which placed the resident at risk for urinary tract infections (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system). Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) with hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting right dominant side, facial weakness, spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system), bacteriuria (presence of bacteria in the blood), pyuria (excess of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor Resident (R) 38's physician ordered fluid restriction. This placed R38 at risk of complication related to hydration status due to the need of dialysis (procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) treatment and history of urinary tract infections (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system). Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R38 documented diagnosis of acute kidney failure, end stage renal failure (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), hydronephrosis (excess urine accumulation in the kidney that causes swelling), multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), history of UTI's, bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the blood), acidosis (excess acid in the body fluids), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 38 received care and services for dialysis (procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) consistent with professional standards of practice which included ongoing assessments of resident's condition, and ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility. This placed R38 at risk complications and unmet care needs related to dialysis treatments. Findings Included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R38 documented diagnosis of acute kidney failure, end stage renal failure (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), hydronephrosis (excess urine accumulation in the kidney that causes swelling), multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), history of urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system), bacteremia (presence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the lack of an appropriate indication for Resident (R)26's Zyprexa (antipsychotic-class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) placing the resident at risk for unnecessary medications and adverse side effects. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R26 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and falls. R26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R26 had long and short-term memory problems and moderately impaired decision-making skills. R26 required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene; R26 required limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) for Resident (R)26, who had a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, or behavior) medications and related complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R26 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance and falls. R26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions, placing the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 03/23/22 at 11:47 AM, observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M assisted Resident (R) 1 with the midday meal. CNA M, without wearing gloves picked up one half of R1's meat salad sandwich and tore it in half. CNA M then held the sandwich while R1 took bites from it. CNA M then adjusted a chair for another resident and returned to holding R1's sandwich without gloves until R1 indicated she was finished eating by turning her head away from the food. On 03/28/22 at 12:47 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated she believed the CNAs could touch the resident's food without wearing gloves as long as the CNA washed their hands or used alcohol gel or foam between residents. The facility's undated Serving Basic policy, documented team members must properly serve food to prevent contamination. Serving staff should avoid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents with four reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU - localized injuries to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or frictions). Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to prevent the development of a Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss into but no deeper than the skin including intact or ruptured blisters) PU on Resident (R) 52's right heel until after a pressure ulcer developed. This placed the resident at risk for further skin breakdown. Findings included: - R52's medical record included diagnoses of PU of left heel, Parkinson's disease (brain disorder that leads to shaking, stiffness, difficulty with walking, balance, and coordination), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents with six reviewed for unnecessary medications Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist identified and reported staff not adequately assessing elevated blood sugars greater than physician ordered parameters for two sampled residents, Resident (R) 4, and R23. This placed the residents at risk for continued elevated blood sugars and adverse side effects. Findings included: - R4's Physician Order Sheet, dated 03/09/22, recorded diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), diabetes mellitus (disease that impairs the body's ability to regulate blood sugar), congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and history of transient ischemic attack (episode of cerebrovascular insufficiency). R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 03/21/22, documented the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to adequately assess elevated blood sugars above the physician ordered parameters for two sampled residents, Resident (R) 4 and R23. This placed the residents at risk for continued elevated blood sugars and adverse side effects. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 03/09/22, recorded diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), diabetes mellitus (disease that impairs the body's ability to regulate blood sugar), congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and history of transient ischemic attack (episode of cerebrovascular insufficiency). R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 03/21/22, documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 (cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide proper infection control during wound care for Resident (R) 52. This deficient practice placed R52 at risk for infection. Findings included: - R52's medical record included diagnoses of pressure ulcer (PU-localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) of left heel, Parkinson's disease (brain disorder that leads to shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with walking, balance, and coordination), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R52 was independent with eating, required extensive assistance of one to two staff for all other activities of daily living, had one Stage 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-03-28 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to display staffing information in a prominent place accessible to residents and visitors. This placed the residents at risk to be uninformed of nursing staff hours. Findings included: -During the survey process on March 22, 23, 24, and 28, 2022 observation revealed no posting of nursing hours in the facility. On 03/28/22 at 09:00 AM, Administrative Staff A reported the nursing hours were usually posted on the wall inside the healthcare entrance/exit. Administrative Staff A stated the posted nursing hours had been removed for wall painting and verified the posting had not been accessible to residents or public. The facility's Daily Nurse Staffing Report policy, dated 10/11/21, documented nursing service is to provide each resident admitted to health care center with the appropriate level of care to attain his/her optimum level of functioning. Nursing service is staffed, organized, and equipped, to provide nursing care on a 24-hour basis. Daily resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$51,438 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $23,520 — penalty dated 2026-05-27
- $5,467 — penalty dated 2026-03-16
- $14,433 — penalty dated 2025-01-15
- $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-12-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.8 | -2.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.5 | -2.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRESBYTERIAN MANORS INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/30/1989 |
| RADATZ, BRADLEY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/30/2014 |
| BRENNECKE, GARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2015 |
| COOK, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| CUMBERLAND, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| HARRIS, DANIEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2006 |
| MCKELL, ELIZABETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| MORRISON, AARON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2015 |
| NELSON, ELEANOR | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2010 |
| OTT, RAY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2010 |
| WEDEL, RANDY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2010 |
| HIND, SHERRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/1989 |
| MILLER, JOAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/01/1997 |
| OWENS, MELANIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/10/2017 |
| SHOGREN, BRUCE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/05/1996 |
| TAYLOR, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2015 |
| PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/30/1989 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175300. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.