Topeka Presbyterian Manor
4712 SW 6th Ave, Topeka, KS 66606 · Non profit - Corporation · 68 certified beds · (785) 272-6510 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2023
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $56,260 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-06)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.7% | 17.9% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.8% | 4.9% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.1% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.7% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.7% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.2% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.4% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.8% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.9% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.4% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.4% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.2% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.4% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.7% | 22.4% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.7% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.23 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.11 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 6.4–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 26.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.75 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 59.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.91 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.69 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide follow-up care and services for Resident (R) 1's fractured wrist when staff failed to make an appointment and take her to a surgeon as ordered by the physician. This resulted in a non-removable device existing for longer than intended without physician oversight, which caused a Stage 3(full-thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) pressure ulcer on R1's thumb. Findings Included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), chronic kidney disease, and a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (full-thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below). R1's 01/22/26 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS recorded R1 was at risk for pressure ulcers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 60 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1 remained free from avoidable accident hazards when staff failed to provide safe transfers using the required number of staff and the required equipment per the resident's plan of care. Subsequently, R1 sustained fractures to both her ankles/lower legs. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for increased pain and impaired well-being. Findings include: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnosis tab, recorded diagnoses of malignant neoplasm (tumor) of the lower right lung, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), age-related osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk), thrombocytopenia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide an environment free from safety hazards when staff left Resident (R) 1 in a mechanical recliner, with the footrest raised, without assessing R1's ability to lower the footrest. On 01/10/24 R1 attempted to get out of the recliner by climbing over the footrest and fell. As a result, R1 sustained a fractured sternum (breastbone) and left fourth rib. This also placed R1 at risk for pain, decreased mobility, and impaired quality of life. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnosis section, recorded diagnoses of fracture of the coccyx (small triangular bone at the base of the spine), fall, acute posthemorrhagic anemia (type of anemia that occurs when a person loses a large amount of blood quickly), Parkinson's disorder (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-11-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from abuse when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M struck R1 on her arm after R1 had physical behaviors towards her. This deficient practice resulted in impaired psychosocial well-being and placed R1 at risk for continued abuse. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) and encounter for palliative care (treatment designed to relieve or reduce intensity of uncomfortable symptoms). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 03/30/23, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not conducted due to R1 was rarely/never understood. R1 had physical behaviors directed towards others one to three days in the assessment period. R1 required extensive assistance with two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting; extensive assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-07-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 16 residents with five residents reviewed for falls. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to respond to falls, assess, and identify injury, and apply standards of care for fall follow up for Resident (R)28. On 07/02/23 at 01:30 AM R28, who had severe cognitive impairment, had an unwitnessed fall in her room. Licensed Nurse (LN) K found R28 on the floor at which time R28 stated she was trying to get to her recliner. LN K assessed the resident and noted an abrasion to the left shoulder. R28 complained of left hip pain at that time. LN K assisted R28 to the recliner but failed to notify R28's physician and representative of the incident. LN K failed to follow up immediately after the occurrence with neurological checks and post fall assessments to identify changes and or injuries and failed to treat the reported pain in R28's left hip. Several hours later, Administrative Nurse E assessed R28, noted a deformity to the residents left leg and sent the resident to the acute hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 68 residents. The sample included four residents, with four reviewed for accidents and supervision. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident (R) 1 resulting in an elopement from the facility. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), generalized anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/05/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of nine, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS noted he had physically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent weekend activities on Saturdays to promote socialization. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being, boredom, and isolation. Findings included: - A review of the facility's Activity Calendar for October, November, and December 2024 was completed. The Activity Calendar for October recorded the following Saturday activities: for 10/05/24 were Chronicles and Current Events, afternoon bingo, deep breathing, exercise, and balance; and on 10/12/24 the activity was afternoon bingo, exercise, balance, and deep breathing. The Activities Calendar recorded no activities for 10/19/24, and 10/26/24. The Activity Calendar for November 2024 recorded no activity on 11/02/24, and 11/09/24. The Activity Calendar listed 11/16/24 was a musical performance. The Activity Calendar on 11/23/24 listed deserts for Thanksgiving open house, and no activities on 11/30/24. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with eight reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to secure electrical panels and cleaning chemicals in a safe, locked area, and out of reach of the ten cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents. The facility additionally failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident (R) 33 and follow R43's care-planned fall interventions related to her wheelchair placement. This placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - On 12/09/24 at 07:05 AM, a walk-through of the Cedar View halls was completed with the following observations: An inspection of an unsecured housekeeping closet in the 580's hallway revealed numerous heavy-duty 3M brand cleaning products on the wall. The room also contained multipurpose sprays and floor cleaners. The cleaning products contained the warning label, Keep out of reach of children, hazardous to humans can cause eye irritation, harmful if swallowed. An inspection of an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-11 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents and five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were reviewed for yearly performance evaluations and the associated in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of the five CNA staff reviewed had yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's staffing list revealed the following CNAs were employed with the facility for more than 12 months: CNA N, hired 09/05/23, had no yearly performance evaluation upon request. On 12/11/24 at 09:28 AM, Administrative Staff A stated CNA N had just been there a year and her yearly performance had not been completed at this time. Administrative Staff A stated the facility was a little behind in completing their staff's yearly performance. The facility failed to provide a policy related to yearly staff performance reviews. The facility failed to ensure one of the five CNA staff reviewed had the required yearly performance evaluations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 63 residents with one kitchen and three dining rooms. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to maintaining a sanitary service environment for food storage and meal service. These deficient practices placed the affected residents at risk related to food-borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings Included: - On 12/09/24 at 07:21 AM, an inspection of the dining room for Cedar View revealed dirty plates stored on the table next to the kitchenette's serving window from the previous evening's meal service. The table contained a stack of domed plate covers stored in an upward position. Inspection of the condiment shelf in the dining room to the right of the service window revealed a large, uncovered container of instant food thickener with no lid on the top shelf. Thickener residue covered the top of the countertop. On 12/09/24 at 08:40 AM, an inspection of the Cedar View dining room revealed that the thickener container had been moved to the table next to the service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The facility identified eight residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a system to alert staff and visitors of EBP needs and additionally failed to complete hand hygiene during wound care and to ensure the sanitary storage of oxygen therapy equipment. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Included Findings: - On 12/09/24 the facility identified Resident (R) 2, R5, R9, R13, R48 R50, R51, and R260 as being on EBP. An inspection of the above residents' rooms revealed personal protective equipment (PPE) stored within them though there was no signage related to EBP or the required PPE An inspection of the rooms revealed no visible indicator or signage for EBP. On 12/09/24 at 09:22 AM, R4's nebulizer mask lay directly on her coffee table…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-11 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 63 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure agency staff received the required resident rights training. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - On 12/11/24 at 09:30 AM, the training record on file at the facility for agency Certified Nurses Aid (CNA) O, CNA P, and Licensed Nurse (LN) I revealed the following: CNA O's facility-provided credentialing file lacked documented training completed for resident rights training. LN I facility credentialing file lacked documented training completed for resident rights training. The file documented she was provided abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE) training. On 12/11/24 at 12:48 PM, CNA Q confirmed she was agency staff. She stated she had completed some in-services through the staffing agency through which she was contracted. On 12/11/24 at 01:48 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H confirmed she was agency staff. She stated she contracted through several different staffing agencies, and she had completed nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-11 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 63 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure agency staff received the required infection control training. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - On 12/11/24 at 09:30 AM the training record on file at the facility for agency Certified Nurses Aid (CNA) O, CNA P and Licensed Nurse (LN) I revealed the following: CNA O's facility-provided credentialing file lacked documented training completed for infection control training. CNA P's facility-provided credentialing file lacked documented training completed for infection control training. The file noted she was provided abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE), and resident rights training. LN I facility credentialing file lacked documented training completed for infection control training. The file noted she was provided abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE) training. On 12/11/24 at 12:48 PM, CNA Q confirmed she was agency staff. She stated she had completed some in-services through the staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two reviewed for accommodation of needs related to assistive devices. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to utilize and ensure the appropriate use of foot pedals during wheelchair transports for Resident (R) 1, R41, and R47. This placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - On 12/09/24 at 07:30 AM, R1 (resident with upper and lower extremity impairments) was wheeled out of his room to the medication cart by the nurse's station. R1's foot pedals were not in place as staff pushed him down the hall. At 07:35 AM, staff applied his foot pedals and wheeled him to breakfast. On 12/10/24 at 08:32 AM, R41 (severely cognitively and physically impaired resident) sat upright in his Broda chair as an unidentified staff pushed his chair down the hallway toward the edge of the dining room close to his room. R41's feet slid along on the floor as staff pushed his chair. On 12/10/24 at 08:56 AM, R41 sat upright in his Broda chair by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff assisted Resident (R) 4 with grooming. This deficient practice placed R4 at risk for impaired dignity and a further decline in ADL. Finding Included: - R4's Diagnosis section within the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted diagnoses of ischemia (decreased supply of oxygenated blood to a body part), heart disease (the heart does not pump as well as it should), myocardial infarction (heart attack), hypertension (high blood pressure), cognitive decline, kidney disease stage four (severe damage to the kidneys and a significant decline in function), and obesity (excessive body fat). R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] noted a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of four which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated R4 needed partial to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 18 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two residents reviewed for treatment and services to prevent and heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)32's low air-loss mattress was set at the appropriate weight for pressure reduction. This placed R32 at increased risk for pressure ulcer development and delayed healing. Findings Included: - R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) on the left dominant side, muscle wasting, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), obesity (excessive body fat), aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with eight residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 33 had a safety assessment for the use of side rails that acknowledged the risks when used with a low air-loss mattress. This deficient practice placed R33 at risk for uninformed decisions and impaired safety related to the risks associated with the use of side rails. Findings Included: - The Diagnosis section within R33's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), history of fractures (broken bones) related to falls, hearing loss, age-related physical debility, fatigue, urinary retention, and age-related macular degeneration (progressive deterioration of the retina). R33's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 41 had a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) approved indication or the required physician-documented rationale including risk versus benefits and nonpharmocologcal attempts prior to the use of the antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication Zyprexa. This placed R41 at risk for unnecessary medication administration and possible adverse side effects. Findings included: - R41's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of vascular dementia with irritation (a condition where a person experiences increased motor activity, restlessness, aggressiveness, and emotional distress), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), anxiety (mental or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two residents reviewed for hospice. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice for Resident (R) 43 and R38. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate end-of-life care. Finding Included: - R43's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), kidney failure (a condition where one or both kidneys no longer work on their own), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), hypertension (high blood pressure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), Parkinson's disease (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five residents reviewed for influenza (a contagious respiratory illness that infects the nose, throat, and sometimes the lungs) and pneumococcal (a disease that refers to a range of illnesses that affect various parts of the body and are caused by infection) immunizations. Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 51 received the pneumococcal vaccine after consenting to the vaccination. This deficient practice placed R51 at risk for acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from the pneumococcal disease. Findings included: - On 12/11/24 an review for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations was completed for R17, R27, R31, R43, and R51. R51's Immunization tab in the EMR revealed he received a pneumococcal (PPSV23) vaccination on 12/17/14 and a pneumococcal vaccination (PCV13) on 01/20/16. The EMR lacked documentation that other pneumococcal vaccinations (PCV20 or PCV21) were offered or given. On 12/10/24 at 08:05 AM, R51 stated he admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-27 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included three residents with one reviewed for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide dementia care and services for Resident (R) 1 when the facility failed to ensure CNA M followed care-planned interventions in response to R1's dementia related behaviors. This deficient practice created an environment that affected R1's ability to maintain her highest practicable level for physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and placed the resident at risk for ongoing abuse (See F600). Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) and encounter for palliative care (treatment designed to relieve or reduce intensity of uncomfortable symptoms). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 03/30/23, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 63 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five residents reviewed for accidents and/or hazards. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to secure chemicals in a safe, locked area, and out of reach of the eleven cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents. The facility additionally failed to follow care planned interventions for Residents(R)10 and R36 resulting in non-injury falls for both residents. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for preventable injuries and accidents. Findings Included: - On 07/24/23 at 07:05AM an inspection of the facility revealed an unsecured room labelled Trash in the southwest hall. The room contained six spray cans of cleaning Spot Remover, room deodorizer, and dry crystal floor cleaner stored on a shelf next to the door. All products identified contained the warning, Keep out of reach of children, hazardous to humans can cause eye irritation, harmful if swallowed. The room also contained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 63 residents with one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards related to storage of food and kitchenware. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to food borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings included: - On 07/24/23 at 07:19 AM an observation in the main kitchen area revealed a stack of pans on a storage shelf. The pans were not covered or inverted. On 07/24/23 at 07:20 AM an observation in the main kitchen area revealed two pots and a bowl on a storage shelf. The pots and bowl were not covered or inverted. On 07/24/23 at 07:22 AM an observation in the main kitchen area revealed a plastic bin on the end of a serving table. The plastic bin was full of small, clear plastic bowls. The bowls were not covered or inverted. On 07/24/23 at 07:26 AM an observation in the kitchen's dry food storage room revealed one opened bottle of caramel dessert topping. The bottle was undated. On 07/24/23 at 07:28 AM an observation in the kitchen's dry food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 63 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control standards were followed related to hand hygiene, soiled linen, and trash storage. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to infectious diseases. Findings included: - On 07/24/23 at 07:10 AM a small trash bag and a larger bag containing soiled linen sat on the floor outside the chapel in the hallway. On 07/24/23 at 08:00 AM Resident (R)10's gait belt hung on the wall next to her recliner. Half the belt rested on the floor of her room due to the wall hook being waist high. The gait belt rested half on the floor through 07/26/23. On 07/24/23 at 11:40 AM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M donned gloves to cut a resident's food. CNA M then removed the gloves but did not perform hand hygiene before serving a plate of food to another resident. On 07/25/23 at 07:10 AM a large trash bag containing soiled linen sat on the floor in the south hall by the equipment storage area. On 07/25/23 at 08:20 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 13 residents reviewed for care plans. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to revise Residents (R)10 and R36's care plans related to the level of staff assistance needed during cares provided by staff. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for preventable falls and injuries to uncommunicated or unmet care needs. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R10's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of seizures (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles), left hand contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint), artificial left hip, cerebral infarction (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), history of fractures (broken bone) to ribs, kidney disorder, and osteoarthritis (chronic arthritis without inflammation). R10's Quarterly Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 63 residents the sample included 16 residents with five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported Resident (R)36's Zyprexa (antipsychotic-a class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medication had an appropriate indication for use, or the required physician documentation. This deficient practice placed R36 at risk of unnecessary medication administration and possible adverse side effects. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R36 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), orthostatic hypotension (blood pressure dropping with change of position), hypertension (HTN-an elevated blood pressure), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 16 residents with five sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)36 and R44 had an appropriate indication for use, or the required physician documentation, for their anti-psychotic (a class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medications. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk of unnecessary medication administration and possible adverse side effects. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R36 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), orthostatic hypotension (blood pressure dropping with change of position), hypertension (HTN-an elevated blood pressure), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 63 residents. Six residents were observed for medication administration. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of five percent (%) or less when medication administration observations revealed an error rate of 33.33 %. Findings included: - On 07/25/23 at 08:20 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) G entered Resident (R)16's room and placed a barrier on the bedside table then obtained the 60 milliliter (ml) syringe from R16's bathroom and a plastic cylinder filled with water and placed it on the barrier on the table. LN G exited R16's room and returned to her medication cart where she obtained and prepared R16's morning medications for enteral administration via R16's feeding tube. LN G placed each physician ordered pill which included: aspirin (medication used to treat pain, fever, headache and inflammation) 81 milligrams (mg), vitamin B-12 (1000 micrograms), Lasix (a diuretic medication used to promote the formation and excretion of urine) 20 mg, Pepcid (a medication used to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 63 residents, two medication rooms, and four medication carts. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to properly date one insulin pen (a hormone which regulates blood sugar) for Resident (R) 32 when the pen was opened for use. This deficient practice left the resident being administered the insulin at risk for adverse effects or less effective insulin administration. Findings included: - On 07/24/23 at 07:12 AM during the initial tour of the facility Licensed Nurse (LN) J's medication cart was inspected. The inspection revealed one opened Novolog 70/30 insulin pen (an insulin analog with an earlier onset and intermediate duration of action) labeled for R32 that did not have an open and/or expiration date noted on the label. On 07/24/23 at 07:15 AM LN J stated all the insulin pens should have an open date as well as the expiration date written on them. LN J stated she could not say for fact who had opened that insulin pen for the first use, but that nurse should have put the open date on it at that time. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and observation, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions for 58 residents who reside in the facility and receive meals from the facility kitchen placing the residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: - On 12/29/21 at 11:08 AM observation revealed shelving throughout the kitchen with dried food debris and crumbs. The top of the dishwasher had white/grey debris dried in place and the dishwasher sprinkler heads were rusted, water pipes corroded with white lime scale and grey/brown lint type material was observed. The oven doors, knobs, interior, along with the grill top, had dark brown/black material throughout all equipment. The kitchen flooring had ground in debris and stains all throughout the kitchen and dishwashing areas. The stainless-steel legs on the work prep equipment had rust and dried food particles which was also present throughout the kitchen and dishwashing areas. The piping behind the stoves had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from use in one of two medication rooms and one of four medication carts. This placed the affected residents at risk for decreased or ineffective therapeutic medication effects. Findings included: - On 12/27/21 at 09:11 AM, observation revealed the Cottonwood/Cedar View medication room had two containers of expired medications: Aspirin (mild pain reliever nad blood thinner) 81 milligrams (mg), expired 10/2021 Aspirin 325 mg, expired 11/2021 On 12/27/21 at 09:20 AM, observation revealed the Cedar View medication cart held four containers of expired medications: Multivitamin expired 08/2021 Tylenol (pain reliever) 650 mg, expired 09/2021 B12 (vitamin) 500 micrograms (mcg), expired 11/2021 Geri-Tussin liquid (cough syrup), expired 11/2021 On 12/27/21 at 09:11 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) H verified staff should dispose of the expired medications. On 12/27/21 at 09:20 AM LN I verified staff should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 18 residents with which two reviewed for bathing. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 14 bathing assistance twice a week, placing the resident at risk for poor hygiene and decreased self-esteem. Finding included: - R14's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 12/01/21, included diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear ), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), and dementia (progressive impairments to memory, thinking, and behavior, which negatively impact a person's ability to function and carry out everyday activities.) without behavior disturbance. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R14 had intact cognition, required extensive assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 14's as needed Ativan (an antianxiety medication) has a stop date as required, placing the resident at risk for adverse side effects related to psychotropic ( altering mood or mind) medication use. Findings included: - R14 Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 12/01/21, included diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), chronic pain, type two diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion )…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$56,260 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $17,155 — penalty dated 2026-04-06
- $12,048 — penalty dated 2024-09-12
- $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-02-01
- $18,233 — penalty dated 2023-11-27
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-30 for 16 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.8 | -2.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.5 | -2.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRESBYTERIAN MANORS INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/30/1989 |
| PILKINTON, HEATHER | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 10/12/2016 |
| BONNEY, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/23/2019 |
| BRENNECKE, GARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2015 |
| COOK, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| GOODWIN, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| HARRIS, DANIEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2019 |
| MCKELL, ELIZABETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| MORRISON, AARON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2015 |
| NELSON, ELEANOR | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2010 |
| HIND, SHERRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/1989 |
| MILLER, JOAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/01/1997 |
| OWENS, MELANIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/10/2017 |
| SHOGREN, BRUCE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/05/1996 |
| TAYLOR, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2015 |
| PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/30/1989 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $984K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175297. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.