No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Wichita Presbyterian Manor

4700 W 13th Street North, Wichita, KS 67212 · Non profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (316) 942-7456 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (316) 942-7456 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited May 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (18) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1301 N West St Ste 1 · (316) 945-5245 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
710 N West St · (316) 943-2299 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Dillons0.5 mi
3932 W 13th St N · (316) 942-7477 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4808 W 9th St N · (316) 942-2293 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4415 W Zoo Blvd · (316) 559-0940

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased32.7%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.3%4.9%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury10.7%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.7%16.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.1%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.7%95.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.2%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.4%18.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine51.1%73.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.3%22.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.2%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.521.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.642.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 193 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
49.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 49.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 103 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.0%CMS range 53.4–64.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.8%CMS range 6.1–12.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge49.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge25.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.7–10.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.841.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.97
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.84
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.69
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.59
RN hoursweekends
59.6%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 45.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.84 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.95 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-28)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2021-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census 49 residents, with 16 included in the sample, and one reviewed for elopements. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient supervision to cognitively impaired Resident (R) 22 who eloped from the facility for approximately eight minutes without staff knowledge within a mile of a busy four-lane highway and within a quarter mile of a busy four-lane intersection next to live railroad tracks. These failures placed R22 in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - R22's pertinent diagnoses from the [DATE] Physician's Orders in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The [DATE] admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Staff Assessment for Mental Status indicating short and long-term memory problems, moderately impaired decision-making skills…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in locked compartments and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys. This placed the residents at risk for medication errors, ineffective medication regimens, and diversions. Findings included: - During an observation of the Medication Room on 05/22/25 at 11:30 AM, the medication refrigerator lacked temperature documentation for 15 days in January 2025, 17 days in February 2025, 24 days in March 2025, 15 days in April 2025, and 12 days in May 2025 from 05/01/25 to 05/20/25. During an observation on 05/22/25 at 11:43 AM, the unlocked treatment cart contained scissors and insulin (hormone used to treat high blood glucose). Observation revealed a Humalog (fast-acting insulin) insulin pen was opened on 04/23/25 and should have been discarded on 05/20/25. It was in the cart on 05/22/25. Further observation revealed a Lantus (long-acting insulin) insulin pen was opened but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 46 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to disinfect the shared sit-to-stand lift (a mechanical lift) after use and failed to utilize proper respiratory infection control methods. This placed the residents at risk for infections. Findings included: - Observation on 05/20/25 at 03:00 PM, staff used the sit-to-stand on Resident (R) 12. Staff then took the sit-to-stand lift out of R12's room and placed it in R7 ' s room without disinfecting it. Ongoing observation on 05/20/25 at 03:20 PM revealed staff transferred R7 with the sit-to-stand lift, then took the lift to the hall. Observation on 05/20/25 at 04:42 PM, R14 ' s nebulizer was on the bedside table still attached to the tubing; it had a clear liquid in the bottom of the chamber. Observation on 05/21/25 at 08:23 AM, R8 ' s oxygen tubing was strung across the room on the floor with the part of the nasal canula that went into the nose resting on the floor. Observation on 05/22/25 at 08:01 AM, R14 ' s nebulizer was still…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-28 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) staff, who worked in the facility were reviewed for required in-service training. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and permanently maintain an in-service training program for Certified Nurse Aide (CNAs) with the required topics and no less than 12 hours per year when one of the five nurse aides sampled lacked the required training hours. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included: - On 05/21/25 at 02:43 PM, review of training records Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N revealed CNA N had ten- and one-half hours of documented training. On 05/22/25 12:12 PM, Administrative Nurse D confirmed that CNAs were required to have 12 hours of training annually and stated that CNA N did not have the appropriate training and there were no records of additional training for this CNAs. The facility's Education policy documented that all staff receive appropriate training in or to ensure the safety and well-being of all residents.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 46 residents. The sample included 12 residents sampled. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to inform Resident (R)37 and/or his representative regarding the risks related to psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications. These practices had the potential to lead to negative and unwarranted physical side effects. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R37 included diagnoses of Pick's Disease (a form of brain disorder occurring in middle age, characterized by slow disintegration of intellect, personality, and emotions), unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance (dementia without a specific diagnosis where the individual experiences disruptive or challenging behaviors in addition to cognitive decline), and anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 07/26/24, documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating the resident was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 46 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess Resident (R) 22 to ensure it was clinically appropriate to leave medication at the resident's bedside for the resident to self-administer. This placed the resident at risk for medication errors and ineffective medication regimens. Findings included: - During an observation on 05/21/25 at 08:40 AM, Resident (R) 22 had medication on her bedside table. The cup contained Plavix (an antiplatelet medication) 75 milligrams (mg), cranberry tablet 500mg, gabapentin 100 mg (a medication to treat epilepsy and nerve pain), Miralax (stool softener), potassium 20 milliequivalents, pramipexole (medication to treat Parkinson ' s symptoms and restless leg) 0.25 mg, Prevagen (a dietary supplement to improve brain function) 10mg, vitamin C 500 mg, Zyrtec (allergy medication) 10 mg, Eliquis (a blood thinner) 2.5mg, Lasix (medication used to promote the formation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 46 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform an assessment for side effects related to ongoing antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) use for Resident (R)37. This deficient practice placed R37 at risk for adverse reactions and complications related to psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medication. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R37 included diagnoses of Pick ' s Disease (a form of brain disorder occurring in middle age, characterized by slow disintegration of intellect, personality, and emotions), unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance (dementia without a specific diagnosis where the individual experiences disruptive or challenging behaviors in addition to cognitive decline), and anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 46 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 10 with activities of daily living (ADL) services, including shaving of facial hair. This placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of life and poor hygiene. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) and anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R10's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS recorded R10 had behaviors, including rejection of care one to three days during the observation period. The MDS recorded R10 required assistance with toileting, showering, dressing, and personal hygiene. The Functional Abilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 46 residents with 12 residents in the sample. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide sanitary respiratory care and services when staff failed to clean the nebulizer (a device for administering inhaled medication) after each use for Resident (R) 45. This placed the resident at risk for infection and increased respiratory complications. Finding included: - R45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 11/12/24 revealed a diagnosis of spinal bifida (a birth defect that can cause respiratory problems). Review of the Five Day Medicare Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. R45 requires partial assistance to complete toileting/showers. R45's Quarterly MDS dated 02/03/25 noted that R45 BIMS score remained the same and no other changes were noted. R45's Care Plan dated 02/18/25 revealed the care plan lacked information on the use of the nebulizer and or the care of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 46 residents with 12 residents sampled which included five residents for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility's pharmacist failed to identify and report irregularities to the attending physician, the facility's medical director, and the director of nursing for Resident (R)18 related to monitoring his pulse for effectiveness and side effects of antihypertensive medications as ordered by the physician. This placed the residents at risk for unnecessary medications and related side effects. Findings included: - A review of the R18's Physician Orders, dated 10/07/21, revealed diagnoses that included slow transit constipation, pain, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The 12/20/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R18 had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she was always continent of bowel and required partial to moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 46 resident with 12 residents sampled which included five residents for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor for effectiveness and side effects of antihypertensive medications as ordered by the physician and for side effects, including constipation related to the use of pain medication for Resident (R) 18. This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary medications and related side effects. Findings included: - A review of the R18's Physician Orders, dated 10/07/21, revealed diagnoses that included slow transit constipation, pain, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The 12/20/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R18 had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she was always continent of bowel and required partial to moderate assistance with toileting. The MDS noted R18 received scheduled and as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 7 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 47 residents. The facility identified one central kitchen with four dining areas. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary food preparation and storage of food to prevent the spread of food borne illness to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Initial tour of the kitchen on 09/11/23 at 11:00 AM with Dietary Staff C, revealed the following areas of concerns: 1. In the dry storage area revealed a container of shredded coconut, resealed with expiration date of 07/19/23. 2. In dry storage area revealed a container of white baking chips, with an expiration date of 04/08/23. 3. In the walk-in refrigerator, eight trays contained dessert foods, uncovered and undated. 4. In the walk-in refrigerator, an undated partial roll of ground beef opened and resealed with plastic cling wrap. 5. In the walk-in freezer, a box of frozen raw dinner rolls, unsealed and open to air. The facility's undated Food Storage policy lacked documentation about labeling of open containers of meat or disposition of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 47 residents with 14 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice regarding the use of a nebulizer (a device that delivers medication as a mist to the lungs) for Resident (R)2. Findings included: - R2's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented heart failure (a condition in which the heart muscle does not pump as well as it should which causes difficulty breathing) and dependence on supplemental oxygen. The 02/04/23 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two or more staff for all cares except eating, which required setup and supervision. The resident received oxygen. The 08/24/23 quarterly MDS documented a BIMS of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident received oxygen. The 03/08/23 Care Area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents with 14 residents sampled, which included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)7, medication regimen was free of unnecessary drugs due to inadequate monitoring related to the resident, who required a laxative, without bowel movement on two occasions for a period of four to ten days. Findings included: - Review of Resident's (R)7's Physician Orders, (POS) dated 09/12/23, documented diagnoses which included constipation, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), abnormal weight loss, hypothyroidism (condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland), and anorexia (lack or loss of appetite). The Annual Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident with Brief Interview for Mental Status, score of 14, which indicated cognitively intact. She was incontinent of bowel occasionally and did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 47 residents with 14 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to appropriately clean the equipment for nebulized medication use by Resident (R)2. This deficient practice could lead to possible respiratory complications and contamination of the devices used for inhaled medication administration. Findings included: - R2's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented heart failure (a condition in which the heart muscle does not pump as well as it should which causes difficulty breathing) and dependence on supplemental oxygen. The 02/04/23 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two or more staff for all cares except eating, which required setup and supervision. The resident received oxygen. The 08/24/23 quarterly MDS documented a BIMS of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 49 residents with one main kitchen and two satellite kitchens, which served all residents in the facility. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, ensuring the residents remain free from the potential of a foodborne illness, when staff failed to date or discard expired food items. Findings included: - On 12/01/21 at 11:22 AM, during the initial tour of the main kitchen, the following items were noted to be expired: five 32-ounce plain frozen yogurt dated 08/01/21 (two months prior), three 32-ounce plastic containers of garlic sauce dated 11/29/21, one 48-ounce plastic Boursin cream cheese spread dated 11/12/21, and one 16-ounce plastic container of sautéed vegetable base dated 10/07/21. There were also 154 thawed nutritional shakes in the refrigerator that were not dated for when they were placed in the refrigerator for thawing, found during the initial tour of the main kitchen. Interview on 12/01/21 at 11:37 AM with Certified Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 49 residents with 16 sampled including one for hospitalization. Based interview and record review the facility failed to provide a copy of the facility bed hold policy to Resident (R) 45 or her representative for her facility-initiated hospitalization. Findings Include: - R45's Electronic Health Record lacked evidence of written notification of the facility-initiated hospitalization transfers and bed holds to R45 or R45's representative. The 09/11/21 Nursing Progress Note documented R45's son requested R45 be sent to the hospital when it was determined R45 had difficulty breathing. The facility obtained an order from Provider K to send R45 to the hospital. Interview on 12/06/11 at 01:52 PM with Social Services Director (SSD) J revealed she spoke with R45's son on the telephone during the weekend of 09/11/21. SSD J stated R45's son requested R45 be sent to the hospital. SSD J verified that no bed hold was placed for R45 in the chart. The Discharge Process policy revised on 11/12/19 stated the facility was to complete the bed hold arrangement for all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 49 residents, with 16 sampled, and one reviewed for elopement. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to update Resident (R) 22's care plan in a timely manner to include interventions related to the use of a wander guard (bracelet that sets off an alarm when residents wearing one attempt to exit the building without an escort). Findings Include: - The 10/28/21 Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the following diagnoses for R22: dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), Alzheimer's (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness). The 10/28/21 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Staff Assessment for Mental Status indicating R22 had short- and long-term memory problems, moderately impaired decision-making skills with fluctuating inattention and continuous disorganized thinking. The MDS documented R22 with wandering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.8+1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.2+1.8 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PRESBYTERIAN MANORS INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/30/1989
RADATZ, BRADLEYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/31/2017
BRENNECKE, GARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2015
COOK, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2012
CUMBERLAND, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2017
HARRIS, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2006
MCKELL, ELIZABETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2012
MORRISON, AARONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2015
NELSON, ELEANORIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2010
OTT, RAYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2010
WEDEL, RANDYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2010
HIND, SHERRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/1989
MILLER, JOANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/1997
OWENS, MELANIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/10/2017
SHOGREN, BRUCEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/05/1996
TAYLOR, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2015
PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/30/1989

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 9%Medicare 17%Other / private 74%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$1,019per resident / day
operating cost
$30,990per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$933per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175301. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next