Emporia Presbyterian Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.03 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 51.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.42 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.12 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.61 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents, with one resident reviewed for elopement. The facility failed to ensure staff provided appropriate supervision for cognitively impaired Resident (R1), who resided in a locked memory care unit, when staff accompanied the resident to the Chapel in the Independent Living Facility area for podiatry services, then left the resident with the contract service staff. On 08/24/23 at 10:10 AM, R1 exited the chapel, ambulated with his walker approximately 100 feet to the unlocked facility exit door, and exited the facility door. R1 then turned right, walked around the front of the building, approximately 400 feet, and sat on the bench under the canopy outside of the entrance door to the facility. On 08/24/23 at 10:25 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M observed R1 seated on the front bench, outside of the facility, and notified Administrative Nurse A by phone. CNA M reported she sat outside with R1 for approximately five minutes after notifying Administrative Nurse A, but then…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to identify and assess risk factors for ileus (obstruction of the intestines, caused by immobility of the bowel) and bowel obstruction (a blockage of the flow of bowel stream) and failed to provide the necessary care and services to respond to symptoms related to an ileus for Resident (R) 37, who admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of ileus on 10/21/21. R37's care plan lacked direction to staff regarding bowel management. On 08/21/22 R37 reported abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. She had a liquid stool on that day. On 08/22/22 R37 reported abdominal pain and the staff failed to assess bowel sounds or consider the symptoms relative to the resident's history of ileus. R37 then had no recorded bowel movement from 08/22/22 through 08/25/22 and the staff did not perform a bowel assessment in response to the lack of bowel movements. The record documented R37 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 51 residents with one kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary conditions for food storage and preparation to prevent the spread of food borne illness to the residents of the facility. This placed the residents at risk for food-borne illness.Findings included:- Initial tour of the kitchen on 03/02/2026 at 07:29 AM with Dietary Manager BB, revealed the following areas of concern:An uncovered plastic tub containing metal spoons sitting on counter in dining area at entrance to kitchen.Five blocks of butter in a metal container uncovered on the counter.The refrigerator contained bowls of spaghetti, milk, cottage cheese, and yogurt on a tray covered with plastic wrap r with no open or use by date.The freezer contained 5 cups of pudding and a piece of pie, two packages of shredded cheese, 2 sheet pans of Jello and 7 sausage links that were not labeled and dated.The spice rack on the wall behind the stove had an open package of brown sugar that did not have an opened-on date. A container labeled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 51. The sample included 14 residents. Based on record review, interview, and observation revealed the facility failed to provide care for Resident (R)11 and R19 in a manner that protected and promoted their dignity. Findings included:- On 03/02/26 at 12:10 PM, observation revealed R11 sat in a chair at the dining room table. Licensed Nurse (LN) G obtained R11's blood sugar reading using a glucometer (an instrument used to calculate blood glucose) from R11's right fourth finger. Continued observation revealed six residents were seated at the dining room awaiting lunch to be served, while other residents were seated in adjacent tables in the dining room, including one visitor and staff. On 03/02/26 at 12:20 PM, R11 got up from the dining room table, walked to her room, and laid down. Observation revealed she had see-through, thin material pink pants and her brief was visible through the pants. On 03/03/26 at 07:45 AM, R11 walked to the dining room table and sat down for breakfast.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of needs when staff failed to ensure Resident (R)8's call light was within his reach.Findings included:- R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (elevated blood pressure), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, and repeated falls.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R8 was dependent on staff for toileting and needed supervision or touching assistance from staff with eating.The Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 01/22/26 documented R8 was at risk for falls related to a history of falls, impaired mobility, weakness, dementia, urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 51 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to keep Resident (R) 58s protected health information (PHI) private on a medication cart that sat against the wall in A hall.Findings included: - On 03/03/26 at 08:29 AM, an observation revealed a medication cart parked against the wall in the A hall with a laptop computer sitting on the top. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R walked away from the medication cart and into a resident's room. CMA R left the computer screen unlocked and opened and R58's PHI was on the screen, visible to all who passed by the medication cart. The information visualized included R58's medications, date of birth , allergy information, and code status. On 03/03/26 at 08:37 AM, CMA R stated she had stepped away from the cart to help a resident. She stated the policy was to ensure the CMA locked the medication cart and pushed the hide button. On 03/04/26 at 08:17 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) I stated medication carts should be locked and the screen on the laptop should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 51 residents; the sample included 14 residents, with 9 residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide follow-up fall assessments for Resident (R) 4 and failed to assess for R7's ability to safely use an electric recliner until after a fall occurred.Findings included:- R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of, diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), restless leg syndrome (RLS - neurological disorder causing painful urge to move the legs, accompanied by creeping, crawling, or tingling,) and peripheral neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet. R7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. R7 required staff supervision with bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 14 residents, including five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on record review, interview and observation, the consulting pharmacy failed to identify blood sugars out of range for Resident (R) 3.Findings included:- R3's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) documented diagnoses, which included diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). R3's 05/06/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS noted R3 had a diagnosis of diabetes and received an insulin injection every day in the look back period of seven days. The Nutrition Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R3 was at risk for impaired nutrition related to a stroke, morbid obesity, and diabetes. R3's Care Plan dated 05/06/25 documented that R3 takes insulin and oral diabetes medications and directed staff to monitor and document side effects and effectiveness.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 14 residents, including five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to follow orders for notification of the provider for blood sugars out of range for Resident (R) 3.Findings included:- R3's Electronic Medical Records (EMR), documented diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin).R3's 05/06/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS noted R3 had a diagnosis of diabetes and received an insulin injection every day in the look back period of seven days. The Nutrition Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R3 was at risk for impaired nutrition related to a stroke, morbid obesity and diabetes.R3's Care Plan dated 05/06/25 documented that R3 takes insulin and oral diabetes medications and directed staff to monitor and document side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 8 remained free of significant medication errors when staff failed to administer his potassium (a medication for hypokalemia (low level blood potassium in the blood) ordered by physicians.Findings included:- R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of fluid overload, hypokalemia (low potassium), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, and repeated falls.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of four which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R8 received a diuretic (a medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine).R8's Dehydration/Fluid Maintenance Care Area Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 51 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff labeled Resident (R)11's insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) flex pens when initially opened. Findings included:- On 03/02/26 at 07:15 AM, observation of the Medication cart located in the nurse's room revealed R11's Lantus (long-acting insulin) flex pen was not labeled with an opened date or an expiration date. R11's second Lantus insulin flex pen had an illegible date written on the pen as it had smeared and was not legible. On 03/02/26 at 07:20 AM, License Nurse G verified the nurses should label and date the insulin flex pens with the date opened. On 03/04/26 at 10:20 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the nurse should label and date the insulin flex pens with the date opened. Medlineplus.gov directs open, unrefrigerated insulin pen can be used within 28 days; after that time, they must be discarded. The facility's Medication Storage policy, dated 02/03/25, documented medications and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 51 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one reviewed for dental care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide timely dental care for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 6.Findings included:- R6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The assessment revealed R6 required staff assistance for personal hygiene, oral hygiene, toilet hygiene and had no oral or dental issues.The Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 04/28/25, for activities of daily living (ADLs) failed to identify or document any sign/symptoms of dental problems or pain due to the broken, decayed, and missing teeth.The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan, dated 01/12/26, recorded R6 required limited to extensive staff ADLs such as grooming, dressing, toileting and dressing. The Care Plan documented R6 had his own teeth, and they were in poor condition,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$30,244 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $14,651 — penalty dated 2024-05-15
• $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-08-29
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-01 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $682K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS