Manor Of The Plains
200 Campus Drive, Dodge City, KS 67801 · Non profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (620) 225-1928 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.3% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 2.9% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.3% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 9.6% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.8% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.3% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.3% | 95.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.5% | 22.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.5% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 77.3% | 73.8% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 14.5% | 22.4% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.6% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.28 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.59 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.0%CMS range 39.1–60.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.2%CMS range 5.7–14.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 69.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 69.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 89.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.3–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.83 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 35.7 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2021-12-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 30 residents, which included seven residents who required a mechanically altered diet (foods that can be safely and successfully swallowed by being whipped, blended, ground, chopped or mashed). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the appropriate mechanically altered diet to Resident (R) 82, who subsequently developed aspiration pneumonia (an inflammatory condition of the lungs caused by inhaling foreign material or vomit) and admitted to the hospital, requiring oxygen on 12/14/21 (after the noon meal) which she did not require prior to this incident. R82 underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD, a procedure to examine the throat, stomach and small intestine) to remove a piece of pork. This placed the resident in immediate jeopardy for choking and at risk for potential death or brain damage due to lack of oxygen through choking. Findings included: - Resident (R) 82's pertinent diagnoses from 11/23/21 Physician's Orders in the Electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-11 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 32 residents. The facility identified five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) employed over the 12 the month period. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review at least once every 12 months for two of the five CNA reviewed, to ensure adequate appropriate cares and services provided to the residents of the facility. Findings included:- Review of CNA personnel files revealed the following:CNA II, hired on 06/20/24, lacked an annual performance evaluation. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R hired 11/17/23lacked an annual performance evaluation. During an interview on 09/11/25 at 12:09 PM, Administrative Staff A reported she expected 100 percent compliance to have the annual performance evaluations completed annually. The facility did not provide a policy on annual performance evaluations.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 32 residents, one main kitchen and one satellite kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. Findings included:- During a second tour of the satellite kitchen on 09/10/25 at 04:40 PM, observation revealed Dietary Staff DD removed a container of lettuce from the refrigerator with gloved hands. Wearing the same gloves, Dietary Staff DD opened a cabinet door, removed bowls from the shelf, and closed the door. With the same soiled gloves, Dietary Staff DD removed the lid from the lettuce container and grabbed a handful of lettuce from the container twice to fill two bowls with lettuce, then turned on the faucet handle, rinsed the lettuce off under water, and shut the faucet handle off. Still wearing the same gloves, Dietary Staff DD squeezed the lettuce and placed it back into each bowl. Dietary Staff DD removed the gloves and applied a new pair of gloves without performing hand hygiene. Dietary Staff DD then opened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) staff who worked in the facility for more than 12 months were reviewed for the required in-service training. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and permanently maintain an in-service training program for CNA staff with the required topics and no less than 12 hours per year. Findings included:- Review of CNA personnel files revealed the following:CNA P, who was hired for the facility on 09/13/22, lacked abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE), social media training, and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) training. CNA P's total hours were not calculated for the 12 hours required.CNA Q, who was hired 02/14/24, lacked ANE and social media training. CNA Q's total hours were not calculated for the 12 hours required.CNA II, who was hired 06/20/24, lacked ANE and social media training. CNA II's total hours were not calculated for the 12 hours required.During an interview on 09/11/25 at 12:09 PM, Administrative Staff A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 32 residents; 12 residents were sampled for advanced directives (a written document, which indicates the medical decisions for health care professionals when the person could not make their own decisions). Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two resident's advanced directives were thoroughly completed when Resident (R) 38 had a do not resuscitate (DNR- or no code, a legal document or order that means the person does not desire resuscitative measures) order but not signed DNR form. Additionally, R4's DNR lacked a witness signature. Findings included:- Review of R4's Physician Order in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded an order for DNR, date ordered 11/04/24.Review of R4's EMR on 09/09/2025 at 12:45 PM, DNR signed by R4 on 11/01/24 and by the physician on 10/31/24. The DNR form lacked a witness signature. R38's Physician Order in the EMR recorded an order for DNR, date ordered 09/05/25.R38's EMR lacked a signed DNR form.During an observation on 09/11/25 at 09:40 AM, a red dot was noted on the name tag of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 32 residents. There were 12 residents selected for review which included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 21's as-needed (PRN) antianxiety (a class of medications that calm and relax people) medication had the required 14-day stop date or a specified duration with a physician's rationale to support the extended use. Findings included:- R21's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).R21's 09/26/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS recorded R21 had behaviors, including refusal of care for one day. The MDS documented R21 required total assistance with most activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS recorded R21 received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 32 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to offer and provide assistance with grooming of facial hair for Resident (R) 25, who participated in her hygiene activities but needed staff assistance. Findings included:- R25's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of macular edema (swelling in a part of the retina that causes blurry or wavy vision, dull colors, and vision loss) and Meniere's disease (a chronic progressive disease of the inner ear, characterized by recurrent episodes of dizziness, progressive hearing loss, and ringing of the ears).R25's 01/20/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R25 required maximal assistance with most AD, which included transfer, bathing, dressing, and footwear. The MDS documented R25 required supervision with personal hygiene.The 01/27/25 Functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 32 residents; the sample included 12 residents with four residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the care planned interventions to prevent falls for Resident (R) 1 and R7. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) documented diagnoses that included right femur (thigh bone) fracture, hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), and narcolepsy (a sleep disorder marked by excessive sleepiness during the day or recurring, uncontrollable episodes of sleep during normal waking hours, usually with sudden, temporary episodes of muscle weakness). R1's 03/06/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R1 had falls and a fall that resulted in a fracture within the last month prior to admission.R1's 03/06/25 Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R1 required assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) and impaired balance during transfers. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 32 residents; the sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for tube feeding (administration of nutritionally balanced liquefied foods or nutrients though a tube). Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 38,a resident who did not eat or drink, had a physician's order for the type of enteral feed formula to be administered through R38's gastrostomy tube (G-tube: tube surgically placed through an artificial opening into the stomach) and/or assessment and direction from the Registered Dietician (RD) until six days after admission.Findings included:- R38's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented diagnoses which included partial intestinal obstruction, malignant neoplasm of colon (the tendency of a medical condition, especially tumors, to become progressively worse, most familiar as a characteristic of cancer), and severe calorie protein nutrition.R38's 09/08/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) not completed at time of survey but included a 09/09/25 Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 12 residents including five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to act upon blood sugar monitoring for Resident (R) 7 when staff administered insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) that should have been held per physician ordered parameters. Findings included:- R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin).R7's 03/16/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R7 had a diagnosis of diabetes and took insulin every day. R7's 06/16/25 Quarterly MDS documented R7 had a BIMS score of seven, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R7 had a diagnosis of diabetes and took insulin every day.R7's Physician's Order noted an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 29 residents with 12 included in the sample with five reviewed for medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician orders directing the nursing staff to notify the physician for blood sugars (BS) below 70 and above 350, for Resident (R)24. Findings included: - R24's signed physician orders dated 07/31/23, revealed the following diagnoses: diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) and chronic kidney disease (inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes, concentrate urine and conserve electrolytes). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident received insulin during the 7-day observation period. The Quarterly MDS dated 07/18/23 revealed a BIMS of four, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident received insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 9 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 29 residents with 12 residents included in the sample, that included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consulting Pharmacist identified and reported blood sugars out of parameters ordered by the physician for Resident (R)24, and the lack of an end date for as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications administered past the 14-day regulatory requirement for R1. Findings included: - R24's signed physician orders dated 07/31/23, revealed the following diagnoses: diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) and chronic kidney disease (inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes, concentrate urine and conserve electrolytes). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident received insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 29 residents with 12 included in the sample, that included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an appropriate end date for as needed anti-anxiety medication administered past the 14-day regulatory requirements for Resident (R1). Findings included: - Resident R1's signed physician orders dated 03/14/23 revealed the following diagnoses: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease- COPD (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and chronic pulmonary edema (accumulation of extravascular fluid in the lung tissues). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 29 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean sanitary environment for residents of the facility by the failure to change gloves when going from dirty to clean, and the lack of hand hygiene while assisting an incontinent resident to use the toilet for Resident (R) 20. Findings included: - On 09/19/23 at 10:00 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) M placed a gait belt on the resident and assisted Resident (R)20 to stand up and then assisted her to sit in the wheelchair. Staff took the resident to her bathroom and instructed the resident to grab the bar to assist with transfer to the toilet. While the resident stood, CNA M pulled her pants down and removed the soiled brief. The resident then sat on the toilet and voided. While wearing the same gloves, CNA M left the bathroom, went to the resident's closet, and retrieved a clean brief. She then proceeded to put the brief on the resident. She then removed her gloves with no hand hygiene done prior to donning clean gloves.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in a safe, sanitary manner and in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to monitor the refrigerator and freezer temperatures to ensure proper food storage and temperatures, failed to monitor the quaternary (chemical used to clean and sanitize surfaces) levels to ensure efficacy of the sanitizer used to clean tables and surfaces, and failed to monitor food temperatures to ensure all foods were prepared/cooked to the safe temperatures. This had the potential to affect all residents. Findings included: - On 12/13/21 at 10:00 AM, during the initial tour of the main kitchen, the following items were noted to be expired: 57.5 dozen eggs (expired between 09/28/21 through 12/09/21) in the walk-in refrigerator, four packaged avocado halves (expired on 11/06/21) in the walk-in refrigerator, and four packages of Instant Potato mix (expired between June and September of 2021) in the pantry. In addition, the pantry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-12-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census totaling 30 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical care equipment in safe operating condition, when the kitchen tour revealed a three-tub sink and a garbage disposal in a separate sink did not work, putting residents at risk for unsanitary conditions. Findings included: - On 12/13/21 at 10:00 AM, during the initial tour of the main kitchen, the surveyor observed the three-tub sink did not work. The plumbing was turned off and the sinks were not being used by staff. There was no sign present noting the sinks did not work. In addition, the garbage disposal located in a separate sink in the kitchen did not work. This sink was taped off with a pan upside down to prevent dietary staff from using the sink. Interview on 12/13/21 at 10:15 AM with Registered Dietician K, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) L and Executive Chef F revealed that 12/13/21 was their first day on the job, as the facility had hired their company to take over management of the kitchen and dietary services. They stated that a new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 30 residents, with 12 sampled, including five for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to the multiple consultant pharmacist's recommendations for Resident (R)15. Findings included: - R15's Electronic Health Record dated 07/01/20 included a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD; major mood disorder). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R15 received scheduled pain medication and pain medication as needed (PRN). R15 also received six out of the seven-day observation period of antipsychotics (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental and emotional conditions) and antidepressants (class of medications used to treat mood disorders and relieve symptoms of depression). The Behaviors Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/01/12, documented that R15 took Citalopram (antidepressant) 40 milligram (mg) daily and Risperidone (antipsychotic) 0.5mg daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 30 residents, with 12 sampled, including five for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, when multiple pharmacist recommendations for a gradual dose reductions (GDR) recommendations were not addressed for Resident (R) 15. Findings included: - R15's Electronic Health Record dated 07/01/20 included a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD, major mood disorder). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R15 received scheduled pain medication and pain medication as needed (PRN). R15 also received six out of the seven-day observation period of antipsychotics (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental and emotional conditions) and antidepressants (class of medications used to treat mood disorders and relieve symptoms of depression). The Behaviors Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/01/12, documented R15 received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-09-11 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit accurate staffing information through Payroll-Based Journaling (PBJ). Findings included:- The PBJ Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Quarter 1 (October 1 - December 31) documented the facility did not have Licensed Nurse (LN) coverage 24 hours a day on the following dates:10/13/24, 1020/24, 12/1/24, 12/08/24 and 12/24/24Review of the Daily Nurse Staffing Form and Payroll Data Sheets indicated the days listed above were covered with the required LN coverage 24 hours each day. On 09/11/25 at 10:14 AM, Administrative Staff A reported the Regional Human Resources people would compete the PBJ report. Administrative Staff A said she expected the PBJ to be reported accuratelyThe facility did not provide a policy for Payroll Based Journal
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-09-20 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ,) when the facility failed to submit staffing hourly data for all nursing personnel by the required deadline. Findings included: - Review of the fiscal year (FY)- Quarter 3, 2022 (April 1 - June 30) revealed the following concerns: The facility failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day for the following dates: On 05/15/22, Sunday (SU), 05/29/22, (SU), 06/04/22, Saturday (SA),06/25/22 (SA),06/26/22, (SA). Review of FY- Quarter 4, 2022 (July 1 - September 30): The facility failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day for the following dates: On 07/10/22, (SU), 08/06/22, (SA), 08/07/22 (SU), 08/14/22, (SU), 08/21/22, (SU), 09/24/22, (SA). Review of FY Quarter 1, 2022 (October 1 - December 31) The facility failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day for the following dates: 10/08 Saturday (SA); 10/13 Thursday (TH); 10/23 Sunday…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRESBYTERIAN MANORS INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/30/1989 |
| KORBE, JERRY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 11/15/2012 |
| BRENNECKE, GARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2015 |
| COOK, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| CUMBERLAND, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| HARRIS, DANIEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2006 |
| MCKELL, ELIZABETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| MORRISON, AARON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2015 |
| NELSON, ELEANOR | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2010 |
| OTT, RAY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2010 |
| WEDEL, RANDY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2010 |
| HIND, SHERRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/1989 |
| MILLER, JOAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/01/1997 |
| OWENS, MELANIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/10/2017 |
| SHOGREN, BRUCE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/05/1996 |
| TAYLOR, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2015 |
| PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/28/2010 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $558K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175306. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.