No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Creekside Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing

1183 Luther Drive, Hagerstown, MD 21740 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (301) 790-1000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602, F0604) — most recent Aug 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744, F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$111,536 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0604) — most recent Aug 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (104) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $111,536 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1733 Howell Rd., Hagerstown, MD 21740
Pharmacy
10 E Wilson Blvd · (301) 790-0710 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
761 E Wilson Blvd · (301) 791-0353 · Call to confirm hours
Park
726 Frederick St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.8%20.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.5%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms20.2%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened30.1%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.7%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%5.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.5%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.7%13.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.0%80.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.3%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.4%9.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.901.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.321.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 267 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.9%CMS range 36.6–49.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 7.3–12.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened11.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.0%CMS range 6.3–13.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.71
RN hours/ resident / day
0.73
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.86
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.58
RN hoursweekends
64.7%
Total nursing turnover
62.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 75.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-06)
39
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

104 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 88 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with the resident and staff it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure the doors to the facility laundry room and the mechanical/boiler room were locked when unattended by staff, to prevent unauthorized access by residents and others. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for accident hazards during the complaint survey. The Maryland Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) determined that this concern met the Federal definition of Immediate Jeopardy. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident and prior to the start of this complaint survey. The facilities plan and action were verified during this survey, therefore this deficiency was found to be past noncompliance with a compliance date of [DATE].The findings include:The facility's investigation of Facility Reported Incident #2678525 was reviewed on [DATE] at 9:35 AM. The report revealed that on [DATE] at approximately 9:00 PM, Staff #1 a GNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents after substantiating that GNA staff that restrained a resident (#926) continued to have access to other vulnerable residents. This was evident during the review of 1of 13 incidents involving abuse. The findings include: On July 31, 2024 At 5:10 PM, an immediate jeopardy was called by the Office of Health Care Quality related to the facility's failure to remove from duty the GNA staff who restrained a resident and continued to have access to other vulnerable residents. A plan to remove the immediacy was accepted on July 31, 2024 at 6:32 PM and abated the following day at 9:30 AM. After the removal of the immediacy, the deficient practice remained at a potential for more than minimal harm with a scope/severity of D for the remaining residents. Review on 7/30/24 at 2:30 PM of the facility reported incident related to a resident being 'secured against the wall ' revealed that per facility investigation and direct observations from other facility staff,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to recognize and address changes in the condition of residents. This was evident for 2 of 14 residents reviewed for hospitalizations and quality of care. (#127 and #921) This failure resulted in an immediate jeopardy. The findings include: 1.On 7/23/24, upon entry to the facility, Resident #127 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in a common area near the nurses' station. A medical record review on 7/25/24 at 9:08 AM revealed that the resident had returned from the hospital 7/19/2024. Review of the orders revealed that, on 7/19/24, the resident was ordered a Hospice evaluation (end-of-life care) and Morphine 0.25 mg by mouth every 3 hours for pain. Review of the progress notes revealed that, on 7/19/24 at 5:13 PM, a pharmacy alert was sent stating, This order is outside of the recommended dose or frequency. Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution 20 MG/5ML (Morphine Sulfate) *Controlled Drug* Give 0.25 MG/5 ML by mouth every 3 hours for Pain. However, there was no documentation that staff called…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility investigation documentation and medical records; observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1. provide adequate supervision to prevent vulnerable residents from exiting the facility unsupervised and 2. have a system in place to ensure that those residents not identified as at risk for elopement are leaving the facility only through the main exit. This was found to be evident for two out of eight residents (Resident #10 and #181) reviewed for accidents during the survey. On 7/19/19 at 9:44 AM, a determination of immediate jeopardy was made in regard to risk for elopement. On 7/19/19 at 4:25 PM, the facility provided an abatement plan which was accepted by the Office of Health Care Quality. On 7/25/19 at approximately 12 noon, an updated version of the abatement plan was provided with a more descriptive plan for the continued monitoring of the interventions. On 7/25/19 at 1:33 PM, after validation of the acceptable plan, the immediate jeopardy was lifted.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review it was determined that the facility failed to 1.) provide sufficient supervision, prevent an avoidable accident, follow appropriate safety procedures and to utilize the use of two staff persons and 2) provide an appropriate mattress and bed to prevent a fall. This was evident for 2 residents (R10 and R23) of 4 residents reviewed who required a bariatric bed and mattress. The deficient practice resulted in harm to both R10 and R23. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following the incidents and prior to the start of this survey. The facilities plan and action were verified during this survey, therefore this deficiency was found to be past noncompliance. Findings Include: Record review of the facility undated policy titled Safe lifting and movement of Residents documented, the Resident safety, dignity, comfort and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding safe lifting and moving of Residents. Safe lifting and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that staff 1.provided care in a manner to ensure residents were not injured. 2. provide safe equipment for residents and 3. provide care in a safe and professional manner. This was evident during the review of 1 (Resident #928) of 5 falls with injury. This deficient practice resulted in harm to resident #9 and resident #928. This was evident for 1 (#9) of 10 residents reviewed for accidents/hazards. The findings include: On 7/23/24 at 9:13 AM, a review of complaint #MD00206718 revealed that Resident #9 had been brought to the Emergency Department (ED) for treatment of a 15-centimeter (cm) leg laceration on the lower right leg. The complainant reported that the facility was unable to tell them what happened to cause the injury. The complainant reported that the resident stated that staff were transferring him/her from their wheelchair to the bed and something caught his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff used hair nets during food preparation and failed to ensure potentially hazardous food items were cooled according to acceptable standards. These findings have the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The findings include:During the initial tour of the kitchen on 2/1/26 at 7:59 AM, 3 kitchen staff were observed preparing breakfast trays. 1 of the 3 staff, the cook (Staff #15), was observed behind the counter putting cooked food items on plates as the other 2 staff called out what was on the meal tickets. Staff #15 did not appear to be wearing a hair net and was confirmed when asked by the surveyor if she was wearing one, she stated, No I'm not. On 2/1/26 at 8:06 AM. The Dietary Manager (Staff #2) arrived in the kitchen and accompanied the surveyor with the tour of the kitchen. On 2/1/26 at 8:22 AM, the walk-in refrigerator was inspected with Staff #2. The following cooked food items were observed:- Mechanical Beef dated 1/20/26- Bacon dated 1/30/26-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with information to formulate an advanced directive. This was evident for 4 (Resident #53, #52, #22, and #2) of 4 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The findings include: An advance directive is a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor. It is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity. 1) Resident #53 was admitted into the facility in late 2025. The resident's medical record indicated an intact cognitive ability. A review of Resident #53's medical record was conducted on 2/2/26 at 12:20 PM. The review revealed that the resident was certified as capable of understanding and making medical decisions for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to treat residents with dignity. This was evident for 2 (Resident #48, #22 ) of 24 residents screened during the initial pool portion of the recertification survey. The findings include:1) The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is a 0–15 point assessment tool used in long-term care to measure cognitive function, focusing on memory, orientation, and recall. Scores indicate cognitive levels: 13–15 (intact), 8–12 (moderate impairment), and 0–7 (severe impairment). Resident #48 was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation after an acute hospitalization for sepsis. The resident was [AGE] years old, and cognitively intact as evidenced by a BIMS score of 15. On 2/02/26 at 11:23 AM during the surveyor's initial interview with Resident #48, a Registered Nurse (RN), Staff #6, knocked on the resident's door, said he had to check the resident's blood sugar, and entered the room without obtaining permission. Staff #6 proceeded to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's physician of a significant change in condition and a decision to transfer the resident from the facility. This was evident for 1 (Resident #83) of 2 residents reviewed for neglect. The findings include:Resident #83 passed away in late 2025. On [DATE] at 7:39 AM, the details of complaint2729325 for Resident #83 were reviewed and revealed concerns with coordination and notifying the physician to send the resident out during a change in condition.A review of Resident #83's medical records was conducted on [DATE] at 2:26 PM. The review revealed progress notes dated [DATE] that indicated the resident's code status was updated from full code to Do not resuscitate and [DATE] that indicated emergency medical services (EMS) arrived in the facility to pronounce that the resident had passed away.A Full Code means a patient wants all possible life-saving measures, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), chest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an alleged violation involving abuse. This was evident for 1 (R#88) of 1 residents reviewed during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: On 02/03/2026 at 9:22 AM, Intake #2697168 dated 12/19/2025 was reviewed for R#88. The intake was a complaint filed with OHCQ by Adult Protective Services on behalf of the resident's family. It was determined that R#88 was no longer at the facility and had discharged on 01/09/2026. On 02/03/2026 at 9:35 AM, the summary included with intake described R#88's family reporting visiting R#88 at the facility to often find him in a saturated and wet brief or soiled.On 02/03/2026 at 10:10 AM, the facility's grievance logs were reviewed for the previous 12 months, and it was revealed that on 12/08/2025, Staff #8 documented R#88's family reported the resident was left sitting in a very wet brief. The documentation indicated staff delayed care due to the residents' agitation. The record showed internal review and referral to psychiatric services.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure admission Minimum Data Set assessments were completed timely. This was evident for 1 (Resident #32) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. The findings include:The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) identifies the process that long term care facilities follow to screen residents, assess resident strengths and needs, plan for resident care delivery, and evaluate the residents progress and needs on an ongoing basis by returning to additional, periodic screening, assessment and planning throughout a resident admission. The RAI process is the basis for the accurate assessment of each resident. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments are an integral part of the RAI and include completion of standardized assessment questions. There are comprehensive MDS assessments and periodic non-comprehensive MDS assessments which facilities conduct to maintain an accurate understanding of each resident's most current needs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to perform required resident assessments. This was evident for 1 (Resident #2) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include:The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) identifies the process that long term care facilities follow to screen residents, assess resident strengths and needs, plan for resident care delivery, and evaluate the residents progress and needs on an ongoing basis by returning to additional, periodic screening, assessment and planning throughout a resident admission. The RAI process is the basis for the accurate assessment of each resident. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments are an integral part of the RAI and include completion of standardized assessment questions. There are comprehensive MDS assessments and periodic non-comprehensive MDS assessments which facilities conduct to maintain an accurate understanding of each resident's most current needs and strengths, and to ensure care planning remains current and effective. An Assessment Reference Date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct care plan meetings after the completion of the comprehensive and quarterly assessments. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for care planning and 1 (Resident #2) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 (Resident #47) of 1 residents reviewed for activities. The findings include: 1.) Resident #1 had been a resident of the facility since 2023. The resident was admitted with multiple health concerns including stroke and dementia. An interview with Resident #1's responsible party on 2/3/26 at 11:09 AM indicated concerns with care plan meetings being missed or rescheduled. On 2/3/25 at 1:24 PM, the Social Services Director (Staff #8) was interviewed regarding care plan meetings. Staff #8 explained that care plan meetings are scheduled quarterly in conjunction with quarterly and comprehensive assessments and documentation can be found in the residents' progress notes. A review of Resident #1's medical record was conducted on 2/3/26 at 1:38 PM. The review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure showers were provided/offered as scheduled to dependent residents. This was evident for 1 (Resident #89) of 2 residents reviewed for neglect. The findings include:Resident #83 was admitted into the facility in mid-2025 with diagnoses that include muscle weakness, morbid obesity, chronic pain, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. On 2/5/26 at 7:39 AM, an allegation related to complaint2729325, that showers were not being provided to the resident as scheduled was reviewed.During an interview with the complainant on 2/5/26 at 1:33 PM, s/he reported that Resident #83 would go 11 days with staff not providing showers.A review of Resident #83's medical record was conducted on 2/5/26 at 1:40 PM. The review revealed a medical order for showers scheduled on day shift every Monday and Thursday. However, this order was discontinued on 9/2/25. No other order was found for showers and there was no documentation in the resident's administration record to indicate showers were being provided.On 2/6/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen and failed to perform a follow up assessment after a resident was treated for shortness of breath. These failures were evident for 1 (Resident #83) of 3 residents whose closed records were reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include:Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST), is a document that translates a patient's preferences for end-of-life care into specific, actionable medical orders signed by a healthcare professional. Unlike general advance directives, MOLST forms are portable medical orders that tell emergency responders and other providers exactly what treatments (like CPR, intubation, feeding tubes) to provide or withhold, ensuring patient wishes for serious illnesses are honored across different care settings.On [DATE] at 4:11 PM a review was conducted of Resident #83's medical records. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility in 2022 and was [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 88 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents at risk for developing pressure injuries receive appropriate services for treatment and prevention. This was evident for 1 (Resident #3) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. The findings include:Resident #3 had been residing in the facility since early 2024. On 2/2/26 at 1:42 PM, during a family interview, the resident's responsible party indicated that the resident had a wound. It was also observed at this time that the resident's bed was equipped with an air mattress with the control box located at the foot of the bed. The control had a dial to set the firmness based on weight. The setting was dialed up to max weight of over 350 lbs. A review of Resident #3's medical records was conducted previously on 2/2/26 at 10:46 AM. The review revealed the resident's most recent weight was taken on 1/27/26, and was documented as 160.2 lbs.On 2/3/26 at 8:27 AM, Resident #3 was observed in bed. The weight setting for the air mattress was still set to max.The Assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor a resident's safety device. This was evident for 1 (Resident #51) of 1 resident reviewed for wandering/elopement. The findings include:A wanderguard is a wearable, electronic security device -typically a bracelet or tag-designed for senior living and healthcare facilities to monitor residents at risk of elopement. It uses radio frequency or Bluetooth technology to trigger alarms or lock doors when a patient nears unauthorized exits.Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in September 2025 with diagnoses that included, but was not limited to, Alzheimer's disease. On 10/08/25 an elopement assessment indicated that they were at high risk for elopement. On 11/13/25 the resident's cognition was assessed as severely impaired. A review of their Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated a significant change in their condition related to a new onset of wandering behavior, and that a wanderguard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents according to professional standards of practice. This was evident for 2 (Resident #52, #19) of 2 residents reviewed for pain management. The findings include: 1) Resident #52 was admitted into the facility in mid-2025. During an interview with the resident on 2/2/26 at 9:18 AM, s/he indicated that pain medications don't always help and non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) are not provided or attempted for pain management. A review of Resident #52's medical orders was conducted on 2/0/26 at 9:26 AM. The review revealed an as needed (PRN) pain medication with a start date of 7/14/25. A pain assessment order also had a start date of 7/14/25, included NPI's with instructions that read, Do you have pain? If Denies - Stop here. If Yes - Indicate Pain score 0-10, Offer a nonpharmacological intervention: 1. Repositioning/Turning, 2. Distraction, 3. Massage, 4. Hot/Cold Compress, 5. Emotional Support, 6. Quiet Environment, 7. Other, 8. Not Applicable.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the provider had a response and rationale to a medication regimen review recommendation and/or identified irregularity and that the response was documented in the resident's permanent medical record. This was evident for 2 (Resident #48, #3) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include:1) Resident #48 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 after a hospitalization which included treatment in intensive care. The resident's diagnoses included but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and malignant neuroendocrine tumors. On 2/02/26 at 12:13 PM an interview with Resident #48 was conducted in the resident's room. The resident was alert and oriented and described in detail their complicated medical history and recent treatment at a tertiary hospital where they were so sick they needed a ventilator. They also detailed their medication orders which they described as a complicated regimen with doses of insulin that were unusual. The resident stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications timely. This was evident for 1 (Resident #48) of 1 resident reviewed for insulin. The findings include:Resident #48 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 following an acute hospitalization that included care in an intensive care unit. Their diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, heart failure, and malignant neuroendocrine tumors. A review of their medical record revealed that they required multiple medications, which included significant doses of insulin before meals, and as needed at bedtime.On 2/02/26 at 11:23 AM an interview was conducted with Resident #48 in their room. The resident was alert, oriented, and able to describe their medical needs, including their medication regimen, in detail. On 2/04/26 at 11:42 AM an observation and interview were conducted with Resident #48 in their room. The resident stated that they had just received all of their morning medications together, which included insulin but was supposed to have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 1) staff performed hand hygiene during 8 of 8 breakfast observations and 2) failed to perform hand hygiene during 2 (R#37 and R#55) of 3 medication administration observations, and 3) failed to maintain a sanitary medication storage environment in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms observed.The findings include:1) On 02/01/2026 at 8:17 AM, the surveyor observed Staff #5, a Geriatric Nursing Assistant, and Staff #7, a Licensed Practical Nurse, delivered meal trays to resident rooms 406, 409, 410, 411, 412, 414, 415, and 416 on the 400 hall. Staff #5 and Staff #7 exited 8 of 8 resident rooms without performing hand hygiene before entry or after exit.No alcohol-based hand sanitizer was observed on the meal cart. The surveyor observed three wall-mounted hand hygiene dispensers in the 400 hallway and one dispenser inside each resident room.2) On 02/04/2026 at 8:35 AM, during medication administration observation on the 500 hall, the surveyor observed Staff #6, a Registered Nurse, fail to perform hand hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to offer COVID-19 vaccinations to staff and residents and failed to educate staff and residents regarding the COVID-19 vaccination. This was evident for 7 (Staff #6, #11, #12, #16, #17, #18, #19) of 7 staff members, and 4 (Resident #2, #8, #48, and #51) of 5 residents, reviewed for vaccinations during the infection control task during the recertification survey. The findings include:On 2/05/26 at 8:31 AM an interview was conducted with a Registered Nurse (RN) who was the facility's infection preventionist (Staff #1). She was asked about the facility's process for offering information regarding COVID-19 vaccinations to staff and residents. She explained that the new admission packet for residents included education sheets for COVID-19 vaccinations and that the education sheet had a place to indicate consent for the vaccine. She further explained that each year the facility's pharmacy let her know what vaccines were available and then she ordered what was needed and offered and gave vaccines to current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure the call bell system was accessible. This was evident for 1 (Resident #45) of 1 residents reviewed during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: 02/01/2026 at 8:05 AM, the surveyor observed R#45 in room [ROOM NUMBER] with the call bell cord partially disconnected from the wall outlet and out of reach while R#45 was positioned near the edge of the bed, asking for assistance.R#45 stated to the surveyor that delayed staff response to call light activation was not unusual and reported waiting up to one hour for staff to respond.The surveyor reconnected the call bell and instructed R#45 to activate the adaptive pendant-shaped call button. The call signal was activated; however, after approximately eight (8) minutes, no staff responded.The surveyor assisted R#45 back into bed and ensured the call bell was placed within reach.On 02/03/2026 at 1:15 PM, these findings were reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) received required training. This was evident for 2 (Staff #11, #12) of 2 agency GNAs reviewed for training requirements during the recertification survey. The findings include:On 2/01/26 at 8:25 AM an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) as part of the entrance conference for the annual survey. When asked about the percentage of agency staff the facility used, she said approximately 80%.On 2/03/26 at 5:31 PM an interview was conducted with the facility's staffing scheduler, (Staff #20). When asked what percentage of scheduled GNAs were from an agency, she replied about 80%.On 2/04/26 at 9:30 AM an interview was conducted with the facility's Human Resources Director, Staff #21 to ask about staff training. She said she was responsible for staff training but only for facility hired staff, and she explained the process for orientation and monthly training. When asked specifically about agency staff training, Staff #21 explained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review the facility failed to ensure alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made and not later than 24 hours to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and Adult Protective Services in accordance with State law through established procedures for 4 of 10 residents reviewed for abuse (R#11, R#2, R#6, and R#19).Findings Include: Record review of the abuse policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program last revised on 11/30/2022 documented, the administrator was responsible for the overall coordination and implementation of the facility's abuse prevention program policies and procedures. The administrator had the authority to delegate, coordinate and implement various components of the abuse policies and procedures to other individuals within the facility. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injures of unknown origins and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain documentation that an abuse allegation was thoroughly investigated. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #2). The findings included: The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program; Policies, Procedures, & Information last reviewed on 11/30/22, revealed that witness reports will be obtained in writing, either the witness will write their statement and sign and date, or the investigator may obtain the stated and read it back to the member and have them sign it. The policy further stated that upon conclusion of the investigation, the investigator will record the results of the investigation on approved documentation forms and provide the completed documentation to the Administrator. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia without behavioral disturbances, Parkinson's disease, and delusional disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control practices and guidelines by failing to notify the local health department of a gastrointestinal outbreak and failed to post a sign in the facility and at the entrance to inform staff and visitors of the outbreak. This was evident for 1 day of a complaint survey. The findings include: On 2/21/25 at 8:30 AM a tour of the facility was conducted. While walking down the 400 hallway observation was made of several rooms with contact isolation signs on the door with PPE (personal protective equipment) outside of the door. PPE consists of gowns, masks, and gloves. Observation was made in room [ROOM NUMBER] of a resident with 4 cups on the over the bed tray table and a basin in the resident's lap. The surveyor asked the resident how he/she was and the resident stated he/she was nauseated, the reason for the basin. On 2/21/25 at 11:26 AM an interview was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and medical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive, resident centered care plan for a resident with a prosthetic eye. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 2/21/25 at 8:45 AM a review of Resident #3's medical record revealed that Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses that included late onset Alzheimer's disease, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies, and age-related physical debility. Resident #3 also had a prosthetic left eye since the age of 4. Review of January 2025 physician's orders revealed Resident #3 had a prosthetic left eye which required daily cleaning. The left eye was to be removed from the socket, cleansed with NSS (normal saline solution), patted dry with dry paper towel, and replaced back in the eye socket. Review of Resident #3's care plans failed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to renew cleaning of a resident's prosthetic eye after the resident returned from the hospital on multiple occasions. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 2/21/25 at 8:45 AM a review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies, dementia, and age-related physical debility. Review of the history of Resident #3 revealed Resident #3 had a left prosthetic eye since the age of 4 years old. Review of Resident #3's physician's orders revealed an order that was written on 1/16/25 that documented, left glass eye (prosthetic) qd (every day) cleaning. Remove left eye from socket, cleanse eye with NSS (normal saline solution), pat dry with dry paper towel, replace in eye socket. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident had the order to clean the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to keep a resident's drug regimen free from unnecessary drugs by failing to hold a medication when outside of physician ordered parameters and failure to notify the physician when the blood pressure was outside of physician ordered parameters. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 2/21/25 at 8:45 AM a review of Resident #3's medical record was conducted and revealed Resident #3 had hypertension and was taking Lisinopril 40 mg. every day and Clonidine 0.1 mg. 2 times a day to treat the hypertension. Review of a physician's order for Clonidine 0.1 mg, documented to hold for systolic greater than 150. Systolic blood pressure, the amount of pressure in the arteries during the contraction of the heart muscle, is the top number of the blood pressure reading. Review of the January 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented on 1/18/25 at 9:00 AM and 8:00 PM the blood pressure was 155/63. The medication was administered both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-05 · tag F0660 — widespread
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility and medical records and interview with staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide discharge planning for a resident requesting transfer to another facility. This was evident for 1 (Resident #903) of 28 residents reviewed in relation to facility reported incidents. The findings include: Facility reported incident #MD00203381 was reviewed on 7/25/24 at 9:32 AM. The report included: 3/6/24 & 3/7/24 resident stated to facility Social Worker [he/ she] wanted to return to [another facility], that [he/she's] only at Creekside because [his/her] daughter wanted [him/her] closer to her. This was day 2 and 3 after his/her admission. On 3/7/24 Resident #903 called 911, was transferred to the hospital then discharged from the hospital to another facility. Review of the medical record at that time revealed Resident #903 was capable of making informed decisions on his/her own behalf. The record failed to reveal the Social Worker or other staff acted upon the resident's two transfer requests including any actions taken by the facility staff to address…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) was working in that capacity on a full-time basis due to currently being assigned the duties of the infection prevention nurse in addition to being the Director of Nursing. This practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 8/2/24 at 8:17 AM, she reported that the Infection Preventionist (IP) nurse had resigned without notice and left the faciity on the same day, on 7/22/24. Since then, the DON had been assigned to take over the role of the IP nurse on top her duties as the DON. On 8/2/24 at 9:40 AM, the DON was interviewed and reported that she has the certification for the IP but knew that she should not be the IP nurse as well. The DON indicated that this was because of her other responsibilities in the facility as the DON. The DON also reported that another staff in the facility was currently in training to be the IP nurse. A Review of the state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-05 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) personnel files and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to conduct yearly performance reviews at least every 12 months. This was evident for 5 of 5 (Staff #29, #31, #32, #33, #34) Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) staff reviewed and has the potential to affect the care received by all residents. The findings include: On 7/30/24 at 1:35 PM, the surveyor reviewed the employee files of 5 (Staff #29, #31, #32, #33, #34) geriatric nursing assistants (GNAs) who were employed by the facility for more than 12 months and selected from a list of employees provided by the facility. a) of Staff #29's employee file revealed a hire date of 11/30/22. No documentation was found that an annual performance review had been conducted in the past year. b) Review of Staff #31's employee file revealed a hire date 5/9/17. No documentation was found that an annual performance review had been conducted in the past year. c) Review of Staff #32's employee file, revealed a hire date. No documentation was found that an annual performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of medical and administrative records, observations and interviews, it was determined the facility administration failed to develop and implement procedures based on the regulatory requirements to effectively attain and maintain the highest practicable wellbeing of each resident. This was evident for 6 (R#932, R#937, R#933, R#938, R#940 and R#931) of 43 residents reviewed during the revisit survey and has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: 1) Resident (R) #932's medical record was reviewed on 10/21/24 at 10:40 AM. The record revealed a Notice of Transfer/Discharge indicating that R#932 was transferred to the hospital emergency room (ER) for evaluation and treatment on 10/14/24. R#937's medical record was reviewed on 10/22/24 at 9:55 AM. The record revealed a Notice of Transfer/Discharge indicating the resident was transferred to the hospital ER on [DATE] for evaluation and treatment. R#933's medical record was reviewed on 10/21/24 at 1:05 PM. The record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review on record review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to conduct and document a comprehensive facility-wide assessment as evidence by failing to address: 1) the facility's average number of residents, 2) staff competencies necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population, 3) an evaluation of the facility's training program to ensure that any training needs are met for all new and existing staff, and contractual individuals providing services and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles and 4) Failed to have a facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all hazards approach. This was evidenced during a Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing review, and extended survey review. This deficient practice has the ability to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: The intent of the facility assessment is for the facility to evaluate its resident population and identify the resources needed to provide the necessary care and services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, interviews with staff and review of resident and facility records, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective quality assessment and assurance program by failing to implement plans of action to correct quality deficiencies identified during the prior recertification survey. The findings include: On 8/5/24 at 3:06 PM, a review of the last recertification survey with a plan of correction date of 9/15/19, and a recertification survey concluded in 2/2018 revealed that effective processes were not put in place to prevent repeat deficiencies. The corrective actions implemented by the facility after the recertification surveys failed to effectively correct deficiencies related to reasonable accommodation of needs (F 558), Pharmacy services/procedures/pharmacist/records (F755), drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs (F757), and free of medication errors rates 5 percent or more (F759). These failures resulted in a continuation of the deficient practices as identified during the current recertification and complaint survey. Cross…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, records review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed develop and implement infection prevention and control policies and prodedures as evidenced by 1) facility staff's failure to don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) before giving direct care to 1a) a resident with a central line (an IV access to a person's veins), and 1b) a resident with an open wound, 2) facility staff's failure ot follow infection prevention and control practices during medication administration, 3) the failure to process laundry in a manner that prevents the spread of infection, 4) the failure to have a system in place to identify and prevent the growth of legionella in the facility's water system, and 5) the failure to review infection prevention and control policies and procedure annually. This was evident for 1 resident (#68) reviewed for dialysis, and 1 (#64) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, 1 out of 5 medication administrations observed and has the potential to affect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-05 · tag F0941 — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee files, pertinent documents and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to include effective communications as mandatory training for direct care staff. This was evident for 5 of 5 (Staff #29, #31, #32, #33, #34) employees reviewed for the extended survey. The findings include: Effective communications describe a process of dialogue between individuals. The skills include speaking to others in a way they can understand and active listening and observation of verbal and non-verbal cues. Understanding what the resident is trying to communicate is essential to giving a response. Additionally, effective communication ensures that information provided to the resident is provided in a form and manner that the resident can access and understand, including in a language that the resident can understand. On 7/30/24 at 1:35 PM, a review of 5 randomly selected employee files failed to reveal documentation to indicate that the employees had received effective communications training: a) Staff #29, GNA, with a date of hire (DOH) of 11/30/22, had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-05 · tag F0943 — widespread
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee files, pertinent documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that required training on abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, and dementia management was completed. This was evident for 3 (#29, #31, #41) of 5 staff members reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 7/30/24 at 1:35 PM, a review of the employee files for Staff #29, GNA, with a date of hire of 11/30/22, Staff #31, GNA, with a date of hire of 5/9/17, Staff #32 GNA with a date of hire of 6/29/10, Staff #33, GNA, with a date of hire of 5/18/20, and Staff #34, with a date of hire of 9/21/29 failed to reveal documentation to indicate the employees had received abuse and dementia management training. On 7/31/24 at 9:33 AM, Staff #10, Human Resources (HR) was made aware there was no training found in the employee files and responded that the employee files were in place prior to her hire at the end of late 2023. Staff #10 indicated she was unsure how HR previously tracked mandatory in-service training but was told…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-05 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespread
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee files, pertinent documents and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide infection prevention and control training mandatory training that included the written standards, policies, and procedures for the program. This was evident for 4 (Staff #29, #31, #32, #34) of 5 employee records reviewed for the extended survey. The findings include: A facility must include as part of its infection prevention and control program mandatory training that includes the written standards, policies, and procedures for the program On 7/30/24 at 1:35 PM, a review of 5 randomly selected employee files failed to reveal documentation to indicate the employees had received mandatory infection prevention and control training. a) Staff #29, GNA, with a date of hire (DOH) of 11/30/22, had no evidence of training, including infection prevention and control training in his/her employee file. b) Staff #31, GNA, with a DOH 5/9/17, had no evidence of training, including infection prevention and control training in his/her employee file c) Staff #32, GNA, with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of employee records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have documentation that Geriatric Nursing Assistance's (GNA) were given 1) in-service training no less than 12 hours per year, 2) abuse prevention and dementia management training, 3) a yearly performance review, and 4) training for GNA's that provide services to residents with cognitive impairments. This was evident for 5 of 5 (Staff #29, #31, #32, #33, #34) GNA employee records reviewed for sufficient and competent nursing staffing reviewed during the survey and has the potential to affect the care received by all residents. The findings include: On 7/30/24 at 1:35 PM, the surveyor reviewed 5 randomly selected employee files of geriatric nursing assistants (GNAs) who were employed by the facility for more than 12 months. Review of the employee file for Staff #29, GNA, with a date of hire of 11/30/22, Staff #31, GNA, with a date of hire of 5/9/17, Staff #32 GNA with a date of hire of 6/29/10, Staff #33, GNA, with a date of hire of 5/18/20, and Staff #34, with a date of hire of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-05 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespread
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee files, pertinent documents and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to include effective communications as mandatory training for direct care staff. This was evident for 5 of 5 (Staff #29, #31, #32, #33, #34) GNA employee records reviewed for during the survey. The findings include: Effective communications describe a process of dialogue between individuals. The skills include speaking to others in a way they can understand and active listening and observation of verbal and non-verbal cues. Understanding what the resident is trying to communicate is essential to giving a response. Additionally, effective communication ensures that information provided to the resident is provided in a form and manner that the resident can access and understand, including in a language that the resident can understand. On 7/30/24 at 1:35 PM, a review of 5 randomly selected employee files failed to reveal documentation to indicate the employees had received effective communications training: a) Staff #29, GNA, with a date of hire (DOH) of 11/30/22, had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the residents' dignity by staff hovering over residents while assisting them to eat. This was evident for 3 (Resident #127, #62 and #14) of 3 residents observed being fed by staff. The findings include: On 07/29/24 at 8:09 AM, the surveyor observed GNA (Staff #43) standing over Resident #127 while feeding him/her in bed. On 07/30/24 at 12:37 PM, the surveyor observed GNA (Staff #44) standing over Resident #62 while feeding him/her in the smaller dining room. On 07/30/24 at 12:59 PM, the surveyor observed GNA (Staff #21) standing over Resident #14 while feeding him/her in the smaller dining room. On 07/30/24 at 01:04 PM, an interview with Staff #21 revealed that she was not aware of a feeding policy but knew to be in direct eye contact with the resident while feeding them. On 07/30/24 at 01:29 PM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed she would have to check if they have a feeding policy and that the expectation is to have eye contact with the resident and not be hovering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that thorough investigations were completed for injuries of unknown origin and allegations of abuse and neglect. This was found to be evident for 5 (Resident #917, #928, # 926, #922, and #900) out of 28 residents reviewed in relation to facility reported incidents. The findings include: 1) A review of the facility's investigation file for facility reported incident #MD00207144 revealed an initial report which read that Resident #917 was found to have a bruise to the right chest, the right inner arm, and on the top of the left 2nd toe. According to Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #42's statement, she was caring for the resident on 6/26/24 around 9:30 AM, and when she removed the resident's gown, she found the bruising. She also reported that she had cared for the resident on 6/25/24 during the 3 PM - 11 PM shift and the resident had no bruising at that time. GNA #40 who was assigned to the resident on the 11 PM - 7 AM shift starting on 6/25/24 was suspended pending the investigation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the resident and his/her representative in writing when the resident was transferred to the hospital. This was evident for 3 (#924, #45, and #33) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #924's medical record on 7/24/24 at 12:17 PM revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital emergency room on 7/20/22 for evaluation of lethargy, low blood pressure and low sodium level. A Nursing progress note, dated 7/20/22 at 10:36 AM, by the former Director of Nursing (DON) (Staff #20), included Call placed to POA (Power of Attorney) for notification. However, the note did not indicate that the resident and his/her representative were notified in writing of the hospital transfer. In an interview on 7/29/24 at 8:55 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was made aware that the surveyor was unable to find evidence that the resident and representative were notified in writing of his/her transfer to the hospital on 7/20/22. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-05 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview with complainants and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that physician notes were available in the medical record and failed to ensure that a review of the residents' total treatment was completed each visit. This was evident for 4 (Resident #911, #921, #9 and #914) of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care during a complaint survey conducted during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1) Review of the complaint for Resident #911 on 7/25/24 revealed concerns with his/her admission to the facility and the availability of their medications. A comprehensive review of their hospital discharge on [DATE] at 7:46 AM revealed discharge medications to include a regimen of Lasix, a diuretic, 1 tablet of 40 mg Tuesday-Thursday and Saturday and Sunday, while receiving 2 tablets of the 40 mg on Mondays and Fridays for edema. S/he was also ordered pain medication, hydrocodone-acetaminophen every 6 hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. This was found to be evident based on errors identified during medication observations of 4 residents (Resident #5, #11, #54, and #476) out of 5 residents observed. The observations were made on each of the three hallways of the facility and involved three different staff members including an agency certified medication aide, one agency Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), and one staff LPN. The findings include: 1) On 07/29/24 at 08:02 AM, the surveyor observed LPN (Staff #2) prepare medications for Resident #5. The nurse was observed to obtain the following medication from the medication cart: 1 Finasteride 5mg 1 Isosorb 30 mg 1 Extra strength probiotic support 1 Metoprolol 25mg 1 Bumetanide 1mg 1 Lovastatin 40 mg 1 Gabapentin 100mg and placed these 7 medications in a medicine cup. The nurse also obtained a cup of nutritional shake. The LPN administered the 7 medications listed above. On 07/29/24 at 09:42 AM, after the observation was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate resident needs by 1) failing to ensure that a resident's call bell was within reach and 2) failing to respond to call bells in a timely manner. This was evident for 1(#64) of 24 residents reviewed in the initial pool and 4 (room [ROOM NUMBER], #501, #512, #503) of 4 rooms observed with activated call bells on 2 of 3 nursing units observed during the survey. The findings include: A call bell system is a method to ensure that residents in a long-term care facility have timely access to assistance by using the call bell system. 1) A medical record review on 7/23/24 at 2:45 PM found that Resident #64 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses that included Dementia. Continued review revealed an admission MDS assessment, dated 4/14/24, for Resident #64. The MDS had documentation that Resident #64's dignosis included moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for all his/her self-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to resolve repeated concerns that were reported during Resident council meetings. This was evident in resident council meetings between January 2024 and June 2024. The findings include: A review of resident council meeting minutes for 2024 was completed on 7/25/24 at 10:09 AM. The review revealed that the following concerns were voiced during the monthly Resident Council Meetings: January- Call lights were not answered promptly, and staff used their phones while providing care to the residents. February -Call lights were not answered promptly, and the staff used their cell phones while caring for residents. March- Call lights were not answered promptly and some not answered at all. April- Call lights were unanswered, and ice water was not passed on days and afternoons. May- Call lights were not answered, Ice water was not passed on days and afternoons, and staff used their phones while providing care to the residents. June- Ice water was not passed on days and afternoons, staff were using their phones…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0572 — isolated
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were verbally provided with a notice of their rights and services during their stay. This was evident during a resident council meeting conducted during the annual survey. The findings include: On 7/26/24 at 2:15 PM, the surveyor held a resident council meeting with six residents, including the resident council president. During the meeting, it was reported that no one reviewed residents' rights at the monthly council meetings. On the same day, a review of the meeting minutes from January to June 2024 showed a statement that Residents Rights reviewed for every month. In an interview on 7/29/24 at 4:50 PM with staff #51, activities director, she stated she did not review residents' rights at the monthly meetings as documented on the meeting minutes. Staff #51 said she would begin reviewing the rights at monthly council meetings. On 7/30/24 at 6:57 AM, the nursing home administrator was informed of the concern that residents were not verbally informed of their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that an advanced directive was obtained for each resident and that there is only one active MOLST for each resident. This was evident for 2 (Resident # 59 and #127) of 4 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The findings include: 1) On [DATE], review of Resident #59's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in [DATE] and was deemed incapable by two physicians to make health care decisions in [DATE]. An initial review of the Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) on [DATE], revealed that these orders were discussed with the Health Care Agent as named in the resident's advance directives. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation of the resident's advance directives. On [DATE] at 9:52 AM, the surveyor reviewed the concern with the Social Worker (SW Staff #19) that the MOLST was completed per the Advanced Directive,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, review of medical records, complaint allegations, and facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff timely notified resident representatives and physicians of a changes in condition and the occurance of a resident falls. This was evident for 2 (Resident #915 and #900) of 5 residents reviewed for of an allegation of neglect with injuries of unknown origin and 1 (Resident #914) of 11 residents reviewed for falls. The findings include: 1. Review of the complaint related to Resident #915 revealed concerns related to neglect. A comprehensive review of Resident #915's medical record on 7/23/24 at 11:15 AM revealed admission to the facility for their after care related to a fall with fractures. A review of the progress notes documented that, on 5/27/24, Resident #915 was found on the floor in the bathroom. A note was entered on 5/28/24 that the resident's representative was notified, 24 hours later. At the time of the incident, resident was not noted as their own representative and was documented on the physician admission history…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and prevent the misappropriation of resident property. This was evident for 1 (#21) out of 2 residents reviewed for neglect. The findings include: A medical record review on 7/24/24 at 10:07 AM showed that Resident #21 had been residing at the facility since December 2022. A continued review contained an attending provider's order, dated 12/9/22, for Resident #21 for oxycodone 10mg, one tablet every 8 hours as needed for pain. A review of a facility-reported incident related to Resident #21 with MD #00193982 showed that, on 6/15/23, staff #52, a nursing supervisor, received 90 tablets of oxycodone 10 mg from the pharmacy for Resident #21. Continued review revealed that Resident #21 requested pain medicine on 6/29/23; however, it was discovered that all 90 tablets of oxycodone were missing from the narcotic box where they were stored. A review of the packing slip for 90 pills of 10mg oxycodone from the pharmacy was signed on 6/15/23 by staff #52. Further review of the Narcotic drug…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a process to ensure that injuries of unknow origin and allegations of abuse were reported to the state agency. This was evident for 1 (#9) of 5 residents reviewed for injuries of unknown origin and 2 (#376 and #59) of 13 residents reviewed for abuse. The finding include: On 7/23/24 at 9:00 AM, a review of complaint #MD00206718 revealed that Resident #9 had been transported to the local hospital for treatment of a 15 cm laceration of their right lower leg. The complainant was concerned because facility staff were unable to explain how this injury occurred. Secondly the resident reported that two staff were transferring him/her from the wheelchair to the bed and s/he caught it on something cutting it open. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 7/23/24 at 12:45 PM, with the Regional Director of Clinical Operations present. The DON reported that geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) #22 and GNA #23 were unable to tell her how the injury occurred. They reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide the minimal information required to the receiving provider at the time of transfer. This was evident for one (Resident #924) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization during the survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #924's medical record on 7/24/24 at 12:17 PM revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital emergency room on 7/20/22 for evaluation of lethargy, low blood pressure, and low sodium level. A Hospital Transfer form was not found in the medical record. A Nursing progress note, dated 7/20/22 at 10:36 AM, by the former Director of Nursing (DON) (Staff #20), revealed Resident MOLST [Medical orders for Life Sustaining Treatment], capacity, current med orders, and copy of bed hold policy sent with resident. Resident prepared for transfer. 911 called and resident left facility via stretcher with 2 attendants in stable condition. Report called to ER. However, the note did not indicate that resident's Comprehensive Care Plan goals, identification and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify residents and/or their representatives in writing of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to an acute care facility. This was evident for 3 (#33, #45, #68) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) A review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed that, on 5/26/24, the resident was sent to the hospital for a change in his/her medical condition. Further review of the medical record failed to produce written evidence that the resident and /or the resident representative were given written notice of the bed hold policy. An interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 07/31/24 at 01:45 PM, revealed that sometimes the facility keeps a paper copy of the bed hold policy for a resident if they are able to complete it, but occasionally, it is a verbal notice to the admissions director. Further interview with the ADON revealed that the bed hold policy was not provided in writing to the resident /resident representative when a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days for a resident who was admitted to hospice care. This was evident for 1 (#45) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need. The nursing home should complete a Significant Change in Status MDS assessment within 14 days when there's a major decline or improvement in a resident's status. A medical record review on 7/24/24 at 12:41 PM showed that Resident #45 had lived in the facility since May 2023. A continued review found that Resident #45's order summary report for July contained an attending provider's order, dated 7/2/24, that stated the Resident was admitted to hospice care on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review of a facility reported incident and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a care plan related to a resident's elopement potential. This was evident for 1 (Resident #922) of 6 residents reviewed for elopement. The findings include: A care plan is a comprehensive and personalized document that outlines the specific needs, goals, and preferences of a patient. Care plans also address the specific services needed to attain and maintain a resident's highest practicable well-being through focus, goals and interventions. The review of the facility reported incident on 7/25/24 regarding Resident #922 revealed a completed elopement assessment on 5/1/23, showing a score of 15, and an actual elopement on 5/2/23, but failed to reveal a care plan related to these findings. A care plan related to these findings was never developed during the resident's 2 week stay in the facility. This was reviewed with the current facility Director of Nursing on 7/25/24 at 9:29 AM who verbalized that a care plan related to this concern…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to conduct an assessment and neurological checks according to standards of professional practice after a resident had a fall. This was evident for 1 (Resident #914) of 11 residents reviewed for falls. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. Neurological checks is a set protocol to check the resident in set intervals that may include the following; vital signs, orientation, level of consciousness, pupils reaction and size, responsiveness, pain, and checking extremities for strength and feeling. 1) On 7/26/24 at 1:50 PM, a review of the facility investigation file for a facility reported incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) were provided with showers. This was evident for 2 (#59 and #64) of 4 residents reviewed for ADL. The findings include: 1) A review of MD00196837 from September 2023 revealed an allegation that Resident #59 only had two showers in two months since their admission in July 2023. A review of the MDS, with an assessment reference date of 10/12/23, revealed that Resident #59 needed partial to moderate assistance with showers. Minimum Data Set- The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. On 08/02/24 at 8:32 AM, the surveyor requested the shower task sheet for July 2023 to October 2023 for Resident #59. On 08/02/24 at 10:06 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed she was not able to provide documentation of showers for Resident #59 from July 2023 to October 2023. On 08/02/24 at 12:03 PM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on pertinent document review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement preventative measures to prevent pressure injuries. This was evident for 4 residents (Resident #25, #47, #2, #75), out of 43 residents reviewed during a survey. The findings include: 1. On 7/26/24, the review of medical records for Resident #25, a long-term resident at the facility, revealed that the resident had a recently healed stage 3 pressure injury on the buttocks. A stage three pressure injury is when the full thickness of the skin is lost. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon, or muscle is not exposed. On 7/26/24 at 10:10 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed regarding the facility's documentation for the turning and positioning of a resident to prevent pressure injuries. The Director of Nursing (DON) reported that the facility considers turning and repositioning part of the standard of care and that there was no order for turning and repositioning, nor documentation when turning and repositioning is done. The DON reported that she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a limited range of motion received treatment and services as ordered by the attending provider to prevent further decline in the range of motion. This was evident for 1 (#24) of 4 residents reviewed for position and mobility. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. On 7/26/24 at 2:15 PM, during a resident council meeting, it was reported that Resident #24 was supposed to be wearing a splint on the left hand; however, staff was not providing it. On 7/29/24 at 4:03 PM, Resident #24 was observed sitting at the nurses' station with no splint on his/her left hand. A record review on 7/29/24 at 4:30 PM showed that Resident #24 had been residing in the facility since 2017, and their diagnoses included left-sided weakness due to stroke. Further review contained an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately document a resident's dietary consumption to ensure the resident received adequate nutritional intake. This was evident for 1 Resident (Resident #12) out of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition during the survey. The findings include: On 8/2/24, intake #MD00208140 was reviewed. Review revealed a concern that Resident #12 did not receive adequate nutrition. Further review revealed that Resident #12 was admitted for rehabilitation. On 8/2/24 at 1:52 PM, review of the dietician progress note, dated 7/11/24, revealed that Resident #12 received nutrition by mouth (PO) and, through a feeding tube. Further review revealed the registered dietician was monitoring the resident's PO intake and prescribing tube feedings based on Resident #25's weight and his/her PO intake. On 8/2/24 at 11:15 AM, Registered Dietician (RD) Staff # 25, was interviewed via phone. Staff #25 reported that she had monitored the percentage of meals the resident had eaten at every meal. She continued that, if the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) administer respiratory therapy (oxygen) according to professional standards and 2) maintain respiratory care equipment for residents who required continuous oxygen via nasal cannula. This was evident for 2 (#25 and #68) of 2 residents reveiwed for respiratory care. The findings include: 1) Resident #25 was a long-term resident of the facility with a history of chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (a chronic lung disease, that can make it difficult to breath). On 7/26/24 at 9:50 AM, review of the medical record revealed the following orders: An order with a start date of 4/10/24, Check O2 sat every shift, (oxygen saturation rate) and an order with a start date of 4/10/24, for 02 L/min via nasal cannula, as needed, for SOB [shortness of breath] related to Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Please indicate when 02 has been applied. See nurse notes for detail. On 7/29/24, multiple observations were made of Resident #25. Observations revealed that the resident was on O2 via nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received pain medication according to an attending provider's order and failed to document pain assessments to include the location of the pain and type of pain for a resident reporting pain. This was evident for 1 (#64) of 1 Resident reviewed for pain management. The findings include: A pain scale is 0-10; 0 means no pain, and 10 represents the worst pain. It is used to assess the level of pain a patient is experiencing for better treatment. Non-pharmacological pain management is an intervention without the use of medications. A review on 7/25/24 at 1:25 PM of complaint record #MD00208061 indicated that Resident #64 was usually in pain; however, staff failed to assess and manage his/her pain. A medical record review on 7/2524 at 2:30 PM showed that Resident #64 had been residing in the facility since April 2024 with diagnoses including cervical spine fracture. The review also noted that the resident had pressure sores on both buttocks and his/her sacral area. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain pre- and post-dialysis treatment records for a resident. This was evident for 1 (#68) of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. The findings include: A medical record review on 7/23/24 at 10:10 AM showed that Resident #68 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, with dependence on hemodialysis. Hemodialysis, also known as dialysis, is a treatment that filters and purifies the blood using a machine in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally. Further review found an attending provider's order for Resident #68 to receive dialysis 3x a week on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday @ 10:30 AM. The order stated, On dialysis days please send a new dialysis form filled in patients' full vitals including weight for the morning. Additionally, there was an order for Post Dialysis Weight every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. An observation on 8/1/24 at approximately 10:00 AM, showed Resident #68 going for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's care was overseen by a physician. This was found to be evident for 3 (#905, #920, and #9) of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care during the investigation of a complaint conducted during a recertification survey and 1 (#57) of 4 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1) A review on 7/26/24 at 11:30 AM based on facility treatment of Resident #905 after multiple consecutive falls that occurred on the day of admission, revealed concerns related to the resident's admission including the physician's medication review. Resident #905 was admitted to the facility on an anticoagulant, Eliquis. On the day of admission, s/he had 2 unwitnessed falls, the second sustaining a bloody nose. Secondary to the bleeding, and due to additional concerns for a gastrointestinal bleed and unwitnessed falls, s/he was transferred to the hospital for further assessment. Upon readmission to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that physicians visits were conducted every 30 days for the first 90 days and at least every 120 days after, and the nurse practitioner (NP) visiting in between to ensure the resident had a visit every 60 days. This was evident for 2 (Residents #9 and #914) of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care. The findings include: On 8/1/24 at 10:56 AM, a review of the facility's policy titled Physician Visits revealed there was no date when the policy was written or implemented. The policy read in #3 that NPs may visit the resident after the initial physician visit and #4 read that NPs may alternate with the physician during the first 90 days of admission, which does not align with the regulatory requirement that the physician must visit the resident every 30 days for the first 90 days. The policy failed to mention the method in which the facility would track these visits to ensure they were done. At the bottom of the policy, it was noted under references the previous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, pertinent document review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain the posted daily nurse staffing data for a minimum of 18 months, or as required by State law, whichever is greater. This was evident during a review for sufficient and competent nurse staffing and has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 7/30/24 at 10:58 AM, a review of the nurse's station revealed a Daily Staffing Report that had the facility's name, with a space to document the date, the facility census, and the PPD (patient per day), which documented the shift census for day, evening and night shifts, and the number and projected hours worked by licensed and unlicensed staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. In the morning on 8/1/24, the surveyor requested the Daily Staffing Reports for February 2024. Review of February 2024's Daily Staffing Reports provided to the surveyor failed to reveal a Daily Staffing Report for 16 (2/3, 2/4, 2/7, 2/8, 2/9, 2/10, 2/11, 2/12, 2/14, 2/17, 2/18, 2/19, 2/24, 2/25, 2/27,2/28,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview, and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's behaviors were being monitored and documented consistently. This was found to be evident for one (#62) of one resident reviewed for behavioral health care. The findings include: On 7/23/24 at approximately 8:05 AM, Resident #62 was observed lying on the floor near the nursing station. Several residents and staff were in the area at the time of this observation. On 7/23/24 at 11:42 AM, Resident #62 was observed sitting on the floor next to his/her wheelchair in the hallway near the doorway of the resident's room. The resident then proceeded to lie down on the floor. No staff were present at the nursing station or within view of the resident at this time. On 7/23/24 at 11:46 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) arrived at the unit and acknowledged the resident on the floor. The DON commented that the resident is care planned for this [behavior]. A care plan is a guide that addresses each Resident's unique needs. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions for a resident with identified elopement potential on a resident with documented altered mental status. This was identified during the review of 1 of 6 residents (#922) reviewed for elopement. The findings include: Review of the facility reported incident on 7/25/24 reported on 5/2/23 an incident where Resident #922 was found outside the facility by the previous Director of Nursing (DON). According to the report, the resident was not known to the DON, she just found an individual on his/her knees outside the facility when she arrived to work on 5/2/23 at 7:29 AM. The nurse and the DON escorted the individual into the facility for an assessment and determined at that time that s/he was the missing resident identified as Resident #922. Resident #922 identified him/herself and stated that s/he was going home to pay my bills and see my dog. According to the facility investigation's initial and 5-day report, an elopement assessment is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that narcotic medications were consistently reconciled by two nurses at the change of shift. This was evident for three out of the three medication carts reviewed for medication storage during the survey. The findings include: On 7/30/24 at 12:50 PM, the surveyor obtained copies of the narcotic shift count sheet from the 400 hall medication cart. A review of this sheet failed to reveal two licensed nurses' signatures on 7/19/24 7 PM shift, 7/23/24 6 AM shift, 7/25/24 11 PM shift, and 7/26/24 from the 7 PM shift change. On 7/30/24 at 12:58 PM, the surveyor obtained copies of the narcotic shift count sheet from the 200 hall medication cart. A review of this sheet failed to reveal two licensed nurses' signatures on 7/27/24 from the 7 AM shift change. On 8/1/24 at 9:34 AM, the surveyor obtained copies of the narcotic shift count sheet from the 500 hall medication cart. A review of this sheet failed to reveal two licensed nurses' signatures on 7/24/24 7 AM, 3 PM, and 5 PM shifts,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility pharmacist failed to comprehensively review the medical record and identify medication errors and alert the staff; and and the facility failed to develop policies and procedures for the monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) that include time frames for different steps in the process. This was evident for 1 (Resident #911) of 13 residents reviewed for medication concerns. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #911 related to a complaint revealed that on their admission they were inadvertently ordered Lasix incorrectly (a diuretic). On 7/31/24 at 10:13 AM, the facility pharmacist (Staff #13) was interviewed. His process for reviewing medications and audits was reviewed at that time. He stated that he would review discharge summaries of new admits, medications administration records and physician orders. The concern and findings related to Resident #911 was reviewed. Resident #911 was admitted on 80 mg of Lasix 7 days a week. Right away, Staff #13 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received their medications according to the attending physician's orders. This was evident for 2 (#24, #72) out of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1) A record review on 7/29/24 at 4:30 PM showed that Resident #24 had been residing in the facility since 2017, with diagnoses that included hypertension. Further review contained an attending provider's order, dated 1/13/2023, for an antihypertensive medication to be administered daily to Resident #24. The order had a parameter to hold (not to give) the medicine for SBP less than 130 mmHg (millimeters of mercury). Blood pressure (BP) is often written as an upper and lower number. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) is the upper number. It measures the pressure in the arteries during heart muscle contraction. A review of Resident #24's medication administration records (MAR)for June 1- July 29, 2024, was completed on 7/29/24 at 6:06 PM. The review showed that Resident #24's antihypertensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records. This was evident in 1 (Resident #127) of 26 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: Resident #127 has been residing in the facility since July of 2022. The resident's record indicated that s/he was hospitalized on [DATE] for hyperglycemia. Hyperglycemia occurs when there's too much sugar (glucose) in your blood. It's also called high blood sugar or high blood glucose. This happens when your body has too little insulin (a hormone) or if your body can't use insulin properly (insulin resistance). On 7/25/24 at 9:32 AM, a review of Resident #127's progress notes revealed the resident's blood sugar (BS) was 600 mg/dl, and the doctor ordered to give 12 units of insulin and recheck the BS after an hour. This was documented by the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN Staff #2) with an effective date of 7/2/24 at 4:52 PM. On 7/25/24 at 10:17 AM, Resident #127's electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure thatthe Infection Preventionist (IP) attended and participated in the facility's quality assessment and assurance (QAA) committee at least quarterly. This was evident during a review of the Quality Assurance Program (QAPI) and has the potential to affect all residents in the facility, The findings include: On 8/5/24, at approximately 3:00 PM, a review of the sign-in sheets for the facility's Quality Assurance (QA) Committee meeting attendance sheets revealed that, from July 2023 through July 2024, there was a QA committee meeting held monthly on 7/20/23, 8/15/23, 9/22/23, 10/2/23, 11/16/23, 12/19/23, 1/18/24, 2/22/24, 3/21/24, 4/11/24, 5/9/24, 6/13/24, and 7/11/24. A review of the attendance sheets revealed that the IP only attended 1 meeting, on 10/2/23, out of the 13 monthly meetings held. There was no evidence to indicate the infection preventionist attended the QA meetings at least quarterly. On 8/5/24 at 3:45 PM, during an interview, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) verified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were offered the pneumococcal vaccine. This was evident in 1 (Resident #54) out of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations during the survey process. The findings include: Resident #54 has been a resident of the facility since July of 2023. On 8/5/24 at 9:28 AM, Resident #54's electronic health record (EHR) was reviewed and revealed no evidence that the pneumococcal vaccine was offered or administered. On 8/5/24 at 10:09 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was interviewed about documentation for immunizations. The ADON reported that all vaccines administered in the facility should be documented in the resident's EHR under the immunization tab, and if it was a vaccine that they received outside, then the facility would request a copy of the record to be scanned in the EHR and saved under the miscellaneous tab. The DON further reported that when residents decline a vaccine and/or immunization, the documentation can also be found in the miscellaneous tab under the consent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-25 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to keep residents free of misappropriation of medications. This was evident for 6 (#18, #42, #228, #229, #30, and #129) of 18 residents reviewed. The findings include: 1a. On 7/23/19 at 11:06 AM, a review of the facility's investigation report for the facility reported incident #MD00132061, dated 10/2/18, revealed that the facility identified missing medications when verifications to orders were completed. An audit of all resident's medication profiles was done by administration. The audit found that 5 Residents (#42, 228, 229, 18, and 30) were identified to have had medications that did not have a physician's order in the electronic medical record. However, it was not indicated that these medications were controlled substances and the medications were being signed out as being given to the resident mainly by one nurse, Registered Nurse (RN) #32. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 7/24/19 at 9:50 AM, it was revealed that the NHA had received a report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, medical and investigation report review, and resident interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate 1) an injury of unknown injury and 2) misappropriation of controlled substances. This was evident for 6 of 18 residents reviewed. 1 (#67) of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions (non-pressure) 5 (#18, #42, #228, #229, and #30) of 18 residents reviewed. The findings include: 1) Review of the facility's incident report on 7/12/19 at 1:50 PM, revealed that, on 7/6/19, a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #46 reported to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #24 that she found a bruise on the resident's left upper arm while performing care. On 7/12/19 at 2:02 PM, an interview with LPN #24 revealed that she had reported the incident to her supervisor, Registered Nurse (RN) #45 and the Director of Nursing (DON). An interview with the DON on 7/15/19 at 10:11 AM, revealed that she did not have evidence that she conducted a thorough investigation regarding the cause of the resident's injury. Her conclusion stated that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop and implement comprehensive person centered care plans including measurable objectives. This was evident for 8 (#10, #70, #68, #181, #23, #11, #62 and #67) of 43 residents reviewed during the investigation phase of the survey. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The findings include: 1) On 7/11/19 at 11:10 AM, a review of Resident #62's active care plan revealed the following problem dated 6/13/19, [Resident #62] has the potential for mood impairment related to diagnosis of anxiety. The goal documented was [Resident #62's] symptoms of anxiety will be controlled with minimal side effects over the next 90 days. This goal did not provide staff with a minimal and an acceptable level of anxiety for this resident. Therefore, the staff would not be able to determine if the goal has been met. During an interview with Unit Manager #11 on 7/12/19 at 10:18 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the resident's plans of care based on changing goals, preferences and needs and in response to current interventions. This was evident for 1 (#68) of 1 residents reviewed for dementia care, and for 1 (#23) of 5 residents' reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The findings include: 1) Resident #68's medical record was reviewed on 7/16/19 at 8:53 AM. Care plan evaluation notes, dated 7/3/18, 10/3/18, 1/2/19, 4/3/19 and 7/10/19 reflected a brief summary of the resident's status. The note, dated 7/10/19, indicated Requires assist with adls (activities of daily living), no adverse reactions from psychotropic medications, no skin issues, no falls, weight stable, slight decline on intake, no behaviors, mood stable. The notes did not measure Resident #68's progress or lack of progress toward reaching his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-07-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) have an effective system in place to ensure the implementation and provision of functional maintenance programs as recommended by the therapists for 2 (#10 and #70) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living and 2) failed to have a process in place to continue restorative therapy to allow residents to maintain their highest level of functioning and prevent contractures for 2 (#67 and #12) of 2 residents reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative care. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in October 2018 with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, history of fall with hip fracture, dementia, hypertension and cognitive communication deficit. On 7/12/19 at 12:02 PM, the therapy supervisor #17 reported that, if a resident was going to be a long term resident, a functional maintenance program (FMP) is often established. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-07-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient staffing to 1) answer call lights during meals and shower times and 2) provide restorative care for residents to make sure they maintained their highest functional level. This was evident for 5 (#59, 39, 49, 70, and 31) of 5 residents attending Resident council meeting. This was evident for 2 (#67 and #12) of 29 residents reviewed for Rehabilitation and Restorative services. The findings include: 1) On 7/15/19 at 9:34 AM, the Resident Council Meeting minutes for June 2018 - May 2019 were reviewed and revealed that there were some concerns that were continually mentioned. One of the continued concerns listed in the meeting minutes was delay in the call lights being answered. During a Resident Council Meeting held on 7/15/19 at 11:30 AM, which was attended by Resident #59, #39, #49, #70, and #31, they reported the delay in call lights being answered was continuing. They reported that during shower time, because it took two Geriatric Nursing Assistants…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of pertinent documentation, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to monitor pharmacy provision of controlled drugs received into the facility and to ensure that each resident receiving a controlled drug had a corresponding physician's order. This was evident for 2 (#MDOO132061 and #MD00134506) of 2 facility reported incidents of misappropriation of medication. The findings include: On 7/23/19 at 11:06 AM, a review of the facility's incident report #MD00132061, dated 10/2/18, revealed that the facility identified missing medications. An audit of all resident's medication profiles conducted by administration revealed that 5 Residents (#42, 228, 229, 18, and 30) were identified to have received medication without a corresponding physician's order. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 7/24/19 at 9:50 AM, revealed that the facility's investigation failed to recognize and determine how Controlled Substance Prescription (II - V) (C2) forms were being sent to the pharmacy and filled, without a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each that resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs by: 1) failing to follow the physician's order for pain management, 2) Administering insulin when none was indicated, 3) Administering a narcotic outside of ordered parameters and 4) failing to identify and eliminate duplicate and conflicting medication orders. This was evident for 3 (#179, #128 and #181) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1) A medical record review, conducted on 7/9/19 at 10:55 AM, revealed a physician's order summary, dated July 2019, that documented an order dated 6/27/19, hydromorphone HCL 2mg tablet oral (by mouth) as needed every 4 hours for pain in right knee and documented in the note section of the order, for moderate to severe pain (4-10). In addition, there was an order dated 6/27/19, Acetaminophen Extra Strength 500 mg give 2 tablets 3 times a day for chronic other pain. Further review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2019,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below 5% as evidenced by 2 errors identified out of 29 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication error rate of 6.9 %. The errors were found to be evident for medications administered to two out of the four residents (Resident #35 and #9) observed during medication administration observations. The findings include: 1) On 7/11/19 at 8:11 AM, surveyor observed nurse #25 prepare and administer medications to Resident #35. Surveyor observed the nurse administer bumex 1 mg(milligrams) to the resident. Bumex is a diuretic medication used to treat fluid retention. After the medication observation was completed, review of the medical record revealed an order, written on 7/8/19, for Bumex 0.5 mg to be administered one time daily starting on 7/9/19. Further review of the medical record revealed that nurse #25 had documented that 0.5 mg tablet had been administered on 7/11/19. On 7/11/19 at 11:26 AM, nurse #25 confirmed that she had administered the 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-07-25 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate staff to serve residents in the dining room in a timely manner. This was evident for 2 of 2 observations in the dining room. The findings include: On 7/9/19 at 12:29 PM, an observation was made of lunch being served in the dining room. Lunch time was scheduled for 12:00 PM, however, at 12:30 PM staff had not served all residents in the dining room. Review of Resident Council meeting minutes on 7/15/19 at 9:34 AM, revealed that residents had discussed issues with dining services in June 2018, July 2018, August 2018, September 2018, November 2018, February 2019, and May 2019. The timeliness of staff (Geriatric Nursing Assistance) arriving to serve the food was mentioned often and the staff scheduler was assigned to ensure that staff arrive on time to serve. During a Resident Council meeting on 7/15/19 at 11:30 AM, all the Residents (#59, #39, #49, #70, and #31) in attendance reported that the dining issues continued. According to these residents, the delay in dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medical records were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 4 (#10, #128, #68 and #181) of 43 residents reviewed during survey investigations. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses which included but not limited to dementia, hypertension and cognitive communication deficit. On 7/10/19, review of the medical record revealed the resident had sustained a fall on 7/8/19 resulting in a hematoma [bruise] to the head. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal any documentation that the resident's physician or responsible party had been notified of the fall and injury. Review of the incident report revealed documentation regarding physician notification on 7/8/19 at 10:00 PM by nurse #29 via phone. The section for Resident Representative notification was incomplete with the sections for time and by whom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-25 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, reviews of records, current survey findings and the facility's prior annual and complaint surveys, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assessment Performance Improvement program to develop and implement effective plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. This was evident during review of the Quality Assurance Program. The findings include: A review of the facility's prior annual and complaint survey results and current survey findings on 7/25/19 at 5:56 AM revealed deficient practices identified during the prior years' annual survey were again evident during the current recertification survey. A review of the Quality Assurance Program with the Administrator and Director of Nursing on 7/25/19 at 10:38 AM revealed that the facility failed to effectively correct deficiencies identified during the annual survey dated 2/5/18. This failure resulted in the recurrence of the same deficient practices. The repeat deficient practices included but were not limited to: reasonable accommodations of needs and preferences…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2) On 7/9/19 at 10:05 AM, an observation was made of Resident #179's room. There was a bedside toilet wedged between the resident's bed and the wall on the left side, which was blocking the bedside stand that was sitting behind it. Furthermore, at the time of the observation, the resident was interviewed and when asked about the room and his/her ability to get around, the resident reported that since the bedside toilet was placed there, he/she could not get in the bedside stand drawers without assistance. He/she stated that staff had been made aware of the concern but did not move the bedside commode. During a walk through with the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Housekeeping Manager on 7/19/19 at 2:03 PM, the CEO was made aware of and acknowledged the concern. Based on surveyor observation and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs by 1) failing to ensure that a resident's call bell was within his/her reach and 2) failing to maintain an environment that allowed a resident to have access to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and interview with staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. This was evident for 1 (#183) of 3 residents reviewed for Abuse. The findings include: A facility reported abuse allegation was reviewed on 7/10/19 at 1:53 PM. The report indicated that Staff #34 was alleged to have been verbally abusive while providing care to Resident #183. The facility's investigation included statements by the resident and Staff #35 who witnessed the incident. The facility substantiated that the resident was verbally abused by Staff #34 and reported this finding to the state agency in their follow up report. During an interview on 7/12/19 at 2:14 PM, the Administrator confirmed that she was aware and involved in the abuse investigation, and that Staff #34 was terminated as a result of this incident. The facility failed to ensure that the residents remained free from abuse. These concerns were reviewed with the Director of Nursing on 7/25/19 at 12:37 PM. Cross reference F 609.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility reports and medical records and interview with staff and resident's family, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure appropriate reporting of abuse and neglect as evidenced by: 1) failure to ensure that a witnessed incident of verbal abuse was reported to the administrator of the facility for 1 (#183) of 3 residents reviewed for Abuse, 2) Failure to report an injury of unknown origin to the appropriate reporting agencies for 1 (#67) of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions (non-pressure), 3) failure to provide evidence that a report of misappropriation of resident's medications was reported to the appropriate reporting agencies within the required time frame for 1 (#MD00132061) of 2 facility reported incidents reviewed and 4) failure to report the results of an investigation of an elopement to the state survey agency for 1 (#181) of 8 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: 1) A facility Reported Incident was reviewed on 7/10/19 at 1:53 PM. The report indicated that Staff #34 was verbally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with residents and staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide written notice to the resident/representative upon transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 2 (#76 and #5) of 4 residents' reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: During an interview, on 7/8/19 at 2:34 PM, Resident #76 indicated that he/she was hospitalized at the end of May or June. Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #76 was hospitalized [DATE] - 6/20/19. Resident #5's medical record was reviewed on 7/12/19 at 1:47 PM. A nursing progress note, dated 7/8/19 at 11:21 AM, revealed that the resident experienced a decline while at his/her scheduled dialysis appointment and was sent to Meritus Medical Center Emergency Room. He/She was later admitted to the hospital. No documentation was found in Resident #76 nor Resident #5's medical records' indicating they or their representative were provided with the required written notification of transfer to the hospital,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide written notice of bed hold policy to the resident/representative upon transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 1 (#5) of 4 residents' reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: Resident #5's medical record was reviewed on 7/12/19 at 1:47 PM. A nursing progress note, dated 7/8/19 at 11:21 AM, revealed that the resident experienced a decline while at his/her scheduled dialysis appointment and was sent to Meritus Medical Center emergency room (ER). He/She was later admitted to the hospital. No documentation was found in Resident #5's medical record indicating that the resident/representative was provided with a notice of the facility's bed hold policy upon his/her transfer. During an interview on 7/12/19, the Director of Nursing indicated that the bed hold policy notice is usually sent with the resident to the hospital, but was not sure when it was sent to Resident #5, since he/she went to the hospital from dialysis. She indicated that she would look into it. As of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-25 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that residents received a summary of their baseline care plan and a list of their medications within 48 hours of admission. This was evident for 1 (#179) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. A base line care plan is developed to care for the immediate needs of the resident until the comprehensive care plan can be developed. A medical record review, on 7/9/19 at 10:55 AM, revealed a Care Transition Readiness Summary, dated 7/1/19, with a corresponding progress note, dated 7/1/19 at 12:30 PM, signed by Unit Manager (UM) #4. The summary documented a care plan meeting with the interdisciplinary team, the resident and spouse. The note did not document whether the care plan and medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the resident record and interview with the resident and facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan by failing to recognize and avoid a resident's documented food allergen. This was evident for 1 (#11) of 3 residents reviewed for Nutrition. The findings include: Resident #11's medical record was reviewed on 7/23/19 at 12:28 PM. The Resident Information tab in the EMR (electronic medical record) listed the residents allergy to peanuts and tree nuts. The physicians diet orders, dated 6/30/19 7:42 PM, included ALLERGY:PEANUTS AND TREE NUTS A Nutritional Risk Assessment, dated 7/10/19, included Food Allergies: peanuts and tree nuts. A Nutrition Progress note, dated 7/14/19 8:50 AM indicated that the Dietitian felt the resident's diet did not likely meet his/her nutritional requirements, that she discussed this with the resident. The resident indicated that he/she felt his/her appetite was improving and desired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident received interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers. This was evident for 1 (#47) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: On [DATE], review of Resident #47's medical record revealed that the resident had resided at the facility for several years and whose diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart disease, dementia, diabetes and contracture of one leg. The resident is dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility with the information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment with an assessment reference date of [DATE] revealed that Resident # 47 did not have any pressure ulcers at that time.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the medical record and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement measures to ensure the resident received the required number of calories and total fluid volume per the dietitian recommendation. This was evident for 1 (#181) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: Resident #181 was observed on 7/18/19 at 6:49 AM lying in bed. He/She had a G-Tube (a gastric tube inserted through the abdominal wall into the stomach to provide nutrition). A feeding pump was at the resident's bedside. A 1000 ml bottle of Glucerna 1.5 cal with carbsteady (a nutritional formula) and a bag of water were connected via tubing to Resident #181's feeding tube. The tubing was running through the feeding pump. The pump was beeping at that time and displayed flow error clog in line downstream of pump. The Glucerna bottle was labeled: 7/17, Start 2000, 85ml/hr. (milliliters per hour) approximately 625 ml was remaining in the bottle. The nurse, Staff #26, entered the room and attended to the pump. The display on the pump…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to ensure that pharmacy reviews were addressed by attending physicians in a timely manner, 2)failed to ensure that recommendations were made for the correct resident and 3) the facility's clinical pharmacist failed to identify the facility's failure to address a GDR (gradual dose reduction) for a resident receiving psychotropic medications. This was evident for 3 (#31, #128, and #68) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1) On 7/15/19, review of Resident #31's medical record revealed that the resident had resided at the facility for more than one year and whose diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes and high blood pressure. Documentation was found that indicated the pharmacist was completing monthly medication regimine reviews and identified irregularities in December 2018; February 2019; March 2019 and April 2019. When irregularities are identified, a Consultation Report is generated. Review of the Consultation Reports revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident who used psychotropic drugs received a gradual dose reduction unless clinically contraindicated, and documented as per standards of practice, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. This was evident for 1 (#68) of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Meds, Psychotropic Meds, and Med Regimen Review. The findings include: Review of Resident #68's medical record, on 7/16/19 at 8:53 AM, revealed diagnoses which included but were not limited to Alzheimer's Disease and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Anxiety Disorder and Depression. Current physicians orders included, but were not limited to, Quetiapine (Seroquel) (an antipsychotic medication)50 mg (milligram) tablet 2 times daily, Quetiapine 100 mg tablet (HS) hour of sleep; Related diagnoses listed for both orders was major depressive disorder, recurrent severe with psychotic symptoms, Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with behavioral disturbance; and Trazodone (an antidepressant medication)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of pertinent documentation, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility administration failed to 1) address the need for upgraded doors to assist in the prevention of resident elopements for 7 out of 9 exits accessible to residents, 2) keep residents free of misappropriation of controlled drugs for 6 (#42, #228, #229, #18, #129, and #30) of 6 Resident identified in the facility's investigation reports and 3) provide dining services in a timely manner. This was evident for 7 months of Resident Council Meeting Minutes out of 12 months reviewed. The findings include: 1) Review of the facility assessment revealed under Maintenance that the Door Alarms were not sufficient and that they were acquiring quotes for enhancement. The facility did provide evidence of a quote for a new wander management system, dated 1/21/19, but no documentation was provided that a new system had been approved or was being implemented. On 7/16/19, while discussing an elopement that occurred in February 2019, the Director of Nursing reporting that the facility was looking into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2019-07-25 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain the posted daily nurse staffing data in a clear and readable format that was readily accessible and up to date. The findings include: On 10/29/19, a request was made to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) for the actual worked nursing schedules/assignments for the time period 9/25/19 through 10/29/19. A review was conducted on 10/31/19 of the nursing staffing, which included a form that was titled, Nursing Care Center Nursing Staffing which included the date, all 3 shifts, the census, number of RN, LPN and GNA along with hours. At the bottom of the form was the total actual hours worked based on PPD. Per patient day (PPD) calculations are determined by the number of residents in a skilled nursing facility (census) and the number of clinical staff caring for them during each shift. Along with that form was a form with each unit and shift along with what nursing staff member worked and a form with assignments. The surveyor discussed with the NHA and the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that concerns and suggestions from the resident group were reviewed and responses provided to the group in writing. This was for 12 of the 12 months of meeting minutes reviewed during survey. The findings include: On 7/15/19 at 9:34 AM, the Resident Council Meeting minutes for June 2018 - May 2019 were reviewed and revealed that there were some concerns that were continually mentioned. The residents had the following concerns noted in the minutes: service in the dining room at mealtime, family members helping themselves to the service line or drinks, lack of towels and washcloths, delay in call light response time, and bedtime snacks were not being offered on a regular basis. During a Resident Council Meeting held on 7/15/19 at 11:30 AM, that was attended by Resident #59, #39, #49, #70, and #31, they reported the delay in dining services, lack of supply of towels and washcloths, delay in call light response time, and bedtime snacks not being offered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$111,536 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-10-17
  • $101,178 — penalty dated 2024-08-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MORDECHAI WEISZ — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ELEBIARY, AHMEDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2022
WEISZ, MORDECHAIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
LIONS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2025
TRUSLOW, CYNTHIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 52%Medicare 25%Other / private 23%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$374per resident / day
operating cost
$11,361per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$399per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215113. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next