Belle Terrace

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 126 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 53.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on one of two nursing units. (Unit B)Findings include: Observations on June 17, 2026, at 10:30 a.m., and 1:45 p.m., revealed that the grab bars on the left side of the toilets in the bathrooms of rooms B 48 and B 52 were loose. In an interview on June17, 2026, at 2:30 p.m., the Administrator confirmed the grab bars in the bathrooms in rooms B 48 and B 52 needed to be repaired. 28 Pa. Code 207.2(a) Administrator's responsibility.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the environment in a clean, comfortable, and homelike manner on two of two nursing units. (A and B wing)Findings include: Observations on December 3, 2025, from 10:45 a.m. through 2:00 p.m., and on December 4, 2025, from 10:45 a.m. through 2:00 p.m., revealed the following environmental issues: In the shower room on A wing, the first room to the right of the door had a sink with brown stains and the faucet had white stains on it. The toilet had a black ring inside. In the shower room's central shower area, there were open holes in the wall around the shower valve system where the water flow and temperature were controlled. The bathtub room to the left of the central hallway had a marred wall on the left back side of the room, the bathtub had blue and brown stains inside, around the drain, and on the side wall by the faucet. The bathtub faucet had white stains. The shower stall in the back of the shower room had a brown ring around the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess a resident's capability to self-administer medications for one of 14 sampled residents. (Resident 19) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Self-Administration of Medications, last reviewed on November 20, 2025, revealed that residents had the right to self-administer medications if the staff and practitioner determined it was clinically appropriate for residents to do so. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 19 had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated October 10, 2025, revealed that the resident's cognitive ability was intact and that he used oxygen. On October 31, 2025, a consulting specialist physician recommended that Resident 19 start taking an inhaler medication to treat COPD daily and that the patient must have this inhaler in his room to be taken immediately upon awakening. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed to accurately reflect the current status of two of 14 sampled residents. (Residents 1 and 4) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Section C (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of Resident 1's MDS assessment dated [DATE], was incomplete. In an interview on December 3, 2025, at 9:00 a.m., the Administrator confirmed that Resident 1's MDS assessment was incomplete. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 received hospice services starting on November 13, 2025. The MDS assessment dated [DATE], incorrectly indicated in Section O (Special treatments, Procedures, Programs) that the resident was not receiving hospice services during the previous seven days. In an interview on December 3, 2025, at 9:59 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident 4's MDS assessment was inaccurate.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet each resident's needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of 14 sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included depression. According to the Minimum Data Set Care Area Assessment summary dated January 22, 2025, the resident's psychotropic drug use was to be addressed in the care plan. Review of the medication administration record from January through December 2025, revealed the resident received an antidepressant (trazodone) during the review period. There was no documented evidence that interventions to address Resident 1's psychotropic drug use were included in the current care plan. In an interview on December 5, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed there was no documented evidence that the care area was addressed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, observation, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate food preferences for one of 14 sampled residents. (Resident 54)Findings include:Review of the facility's weekly menu revealed that the lunch meal for December 3, 2025, was spaghetti noodles with meat, breadstick, tossed salad, and fruit cocktail. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 54 had diagnoses that included anxiety, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and major depressive disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was alert and able to make her needs known. During an interview on December 3, 2025, at 12:25 p.m., Resident 54 stated that her meals did not match what was on her ticket and she received foods she did not like. On December 3, 2025, at 12:30 p.m., her lunch tray was observed on her bedside table and had spaghetti noodles and meat sauce. Resident 54 stated that she did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent the spread of infection for one of four sampled residents observed during medication administration. (Resident 4)Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last reviewed on November 20, 2025, revealed that staff was to wear a gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities, such as using the resident's feeding tube and for residents with indwelling medical devices to minimize the spread of multidrug resistant organisms. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 had diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and lung cancer. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated November 18, 2025, revealed that Resident 4 had an enteral feeding tube (a soft plastic tube inserted into the digestive system used to provide nutrition directly through the stomach.) On November 3,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for one of eight sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation (irregular rapid heart rhythm that can lead to bloods clots or a stroke), muscle weakness and angiodysplasia of the stomach and duodenum (an abnormality characterized by dilated, fragile blood vessels). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was alert and had pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs). On April 3, 2025, there was a physician's order that directed staff to schedule a chest X-ray for Resident 1 related to pleural effusion hypoxia (excessive fluid build-up in the lungs), and a physician's order dated April 7, 2025, that directed staff to obtain a stool specimen to rule out…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent pressure ulcers for three of eight sampled residents. (Residents 1, 2, 3). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation (irregular rapid heart rhythm that can lead to bloods clots or a stroke), muscle weakness, pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs), and angiodysplasia of stomach and duodenum (an abnormality characterized by dilated, fragile blood vessels). According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated March 19, 2025, the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers, had limited mobility of her lower legs, and could communicate her needs. On March 12, 2025, a physician's order directed staff to apply heel boots (devices to protect the skin of the feet) while in bed. Review of the comprehensive care plan revealed that the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, employee file review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate an employee criminal background check, verify professional license/registration, and/or ensure employees completed required abuse training in a timely manner for six of six newly hired employees. (Employees RN 1, RN 2, RN 3, NA 1, NA 2, DA 1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property, last reviewed October 10, 2024, revealed that the facility was to screen potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect, or mistreating residents prior to employment. This included attempts to obtain information from previous employers and checking with the appropriate licensing boards and registries. The facility was also to educate staff upon hire and annually thereafter regarding the facility's policy to prevent Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation of residents, and Misappropriation of Resident Property. Review of employee files revealed the following: NA 1 had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MORDECHAI WEISZ — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $611K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA