Allbridge Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 40.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the safety of Resident #34, who obtained access to a locked employee breakroom to utilize a facility microwave unsupervised. Actual harm occurred on 02/28/24 when Resident #34 sustained second degree burns to his left thigh after spilling hot water on his leg. The injury was a result of Resident #34 entering an employee breakroom with a Styrofoam cup of water where he proceeded to heat the water in the facility microwave without supervision. Upon exiting the breakroom the resident spilled the cup of hot water on his left thigh resulting in second-degree burns (a type of burn that affects the first and second layer of skin. The resident complained of subsequent pain to the area and required a wound care treatment. (Second-degree burns can cause pain, redness, blistering and sloughing of the top layers of skin.). At the time of the incident, the facility failed to ensure the resident did not have access to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, review of the facilities Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's allegation of physical abuse was timely reported to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 43. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 08/01/23. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, muscle wasting and atrophy, anxiety, mood disorder, and dementia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 10/02/25 revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact, exhibited no behaviors or delusions and was dependent on staff for bathing and toileting. Review of the care plan revised 10/29/25 revealed Resident #3 had a history of anxiety and will yell out/scream during showers accuse staff of breaking teeth when brushing, and had of history shower refusals and oral care. Interventions included assessing and monitoring for anxiety, behavioral health services,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a requested discharge process was completed timely and thoroughly. This affected one (Resident #9) of three residents reviewed for discharge process. The census was 39.Findings Include:Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were muscle wasting, cognitive communication deficit, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, dysphagia, ocular hypertension, presbyopia, atrophic disorder of skin, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, psychosis, gout, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of his minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/10/25, revealed he was cognitively intact.Review of Resident #9's progress notes, dated 10/03/25 to 10/09/25, revealed a request from Resident #9 and/or power of attorney (POA) to have a referral sent to two different nursing homes for a transfer. Both transfers were put in and within…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-21 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and document review the facility failed to timely submit at least quarterly the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing information for quarter one of 2025 to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). This affected all 39 residents in the building. Findings include: Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report [NAME] Report 1705 run date 05/08/25 for quarter one of 2025 (10/01/24 to 12/31/24) revealed the facility failed to submit staffing data for the quarter. Interview with Regional Director of Clinical Operations #119 on 05/20/25 at 02:34 P.M. verified corporate did not report their PBJ staffing. The corporate was under the assumption they did not have to report until they had their first star rating after their first annual survey.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, review of personnel files, review of the tuberculosis (TB) risk assessment, and review of facility policies the facility failed to fully complete the TB risk assessment and failed to test staff according to their TB risk assessment. This had the potential to affect 39 of 39 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's TB risk assessment worksheet, dated 04/01/25 revealed under risk classification the facility put 'not applicable' next to how many inpatient beds are in your inpatient setting? They did not indicate how many patients with TB they had encountered in the last year and did not indicate their risk level. The facility indicated healthcare workers would be tested for TB upon hire and annually. Review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #107 revealed a hire date of 03/02/24, she did not have an annual TB test. Review of the personnel file for State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #126 revealed a hire date of 11/02/23, she did not have an annual TB test. Review of the personnel file for STNA #138…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain and sanitary and homelike environment. This had the potential to affect the 39 of 39 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. 05/21/25 from 1:46 P.M. to 1:52 P.M. tour of the facility with Regional Director of Dietary Services #124 revealed the following: a. The hallway tile has a dark build up around the wall and the floor. b. room [ROOM NUMBER] has a dark build up around the tile and the wall in the room and bathroom and a rusty colored build up around the commode. Patches of paint missing on the wall in the bathroom. The door into the room, bathroom and door jams with the paint scuffed. c. The hand rail scuffed in the hallway outside of the kitchen entrance. d. The hallway outside of the kitchen entrance with a rust colored build up at the tile and wall. e. A chair by the 100 nurses station with multiple stains on the upholstery. f. The two doors and door jam into the dining room scuffed. g. The carpet in the from area…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 01/12/24. Medical diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, traumatic subdue hemorrhage, hypertension, arteriosclerotic heart disease, unspecified psychosis, alcohol abuse, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/15/25 revealed the resident had a coded diagnoses of Anxiety, Depression, and Psychotic Disorder. Review of Resident #11 PASARR document dated 01/17/24, indicated no for mental health diagnoses and no diagnosis of substance use related disorder. Interview on 05/20/25 at 09:54 A.M. with Social Service staff #195 confirmed the PASARR documents for Resident #11 need to be updated to accurately reflect his diagnoses. 4. Record review of Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 11/07/23 with pertinent diagnoses of: anoxic brain damage, cerebral atherosclerosis, contracture right and left hand, muscle wasting, HIV, major depressive disorder,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and test tray, the facility failed to maintain palatable and appetizing food temperatures. This had the potential to affect all but three (Resident #12, #21 and #26) who do not receive a meal tray from the kitchen. The census was 39. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included right and left above knee amputation, mild intellectual disability, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, anxiety, chronic kidney disease Stage 3 and hypertensive heart disease. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact. He required set up or clean up assistance with eating. Interview on 05/18/25 at 11:04 A.M. with Resident #7 revealed the food is hard, burnt and cold most of the time. 2. Record review of Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 09/09/24 with pertinent diagnoses of: chronic obstructive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all but three (Resident #12, #21 and #26) who do not receive a meal tray from the kitchen. The census was 39. Findings include: 1. On 05/19/25 at 11:20 A.M. Observation of [NAME] #134 revealed she washed her hands and put on gloves and took the food out of the steamer and oven. Removed her gloves and put on new gloves without washing her hands. Then she temped the food, placed two pieces of Salisbury steak and gravy in robo [NAME] and pureed, washed it out and placed two serving of carrots and butter and pureed. [NAME] #134 then removed one glove and put on a new glove without washing hands. 11:35 A.M. this was verified during interview with [NAME] #134 during interview. 2. On 05/20/25 at 11:48 A.M. observations revealed Dietary Supervisor #101 washes his hands and puts on gloves and starts to prepare the resident plates, plates were observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, records review and resident family interview, the facility failed to have written authorization to handle resident funds. This affected one (Resident #22) of five residents reviewed for funds. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Record review of Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 06/22/24 with pertinent diagnoses of: metabolic encephalopathy, major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, vascular dementia, and hypertension. Review of the 02/18/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the resident fund management service document dated 03/10/25 revealed Resident #22's power of attorney gave verbal consent for the facility to handle Resident #22 funds. Interview with Admissions #103 on 05/21/25 at 11:56 A.M. revealed she handles resident funds and she stated she did not have written authorization to handle Resident #22 funds only a verbal consent. Interview with Resident #22 power of attorney on 05/21/25 at 1:47 P.M. revealed she does not recall ever…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the self reported incident, staff interview and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to report the alleged verbal abuse in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #20) of one reviewed for self reported incidents. The census was 39. Findings include: Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, diabetes, Chronic kidney disease, alcohol abuse, restlessness and agitation, depression and mixed anxiety, delirium and psychotic disorder with hallucinations. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was moderately impaired. Review of the Self Reported Incident (SRI) dated 05/10/25 revealed on 05/07/25 at approximately 8:50 A.M. a day shift staff member approached the administrator and reported the resident had informed her a night shift aide had called her a Bitch. Both the staff member and resident were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MORDECHAI WEISZ — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH