Willow Woods Rehabilitation And Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 72.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and investigation, review of a police report, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to protect Resident #2's right to be free from physical abuse by Resident #44. Actual harm occurred on 11/28/24 when Resident #2, who was alert and oriented, was punched in the face by Resident #44, who had known aggressive behaviors towards others, during an unprovoked incident while Resident #2 was laying in his bed, sustaining a hematoma to the right eye area and bruising to his right upper arm. Resident #2 was taken to the hospital emergency department for evaluation, diagnosed with a facial hematoma and returned to the facility. In addition, the incident was identified to be a stressor to Resident #2 and Resident #2 indicated he was shook up as a result of the unprovoked incident. This affected one resident (#2) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and/or intervention to prevent Resident #64 from sustaining a burn to his abdomen. This affected one resident (#64) of four residents who were reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 71. Actual harm occurred on 11/03/24 when Resident #64, who had severe cognitive impairment, was found in his room with a cigarette lighter (belonging to Resident #85) and his clothing smoldering subsequently sustaining a second-degree burn (an injury that affects both the outer layer of skin or epidermis and part of the underlying layer called the dermis) to his abdomen requiring treatment in the emergency room. Resident #64 returned to the facility from the emergency room on [DATE] and required follow-up treatment at a wound clinic for the burn. Findings include: Review of the medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment in good repair. This finding affected 16 residents (#1, #7, #9, #16, #20, #24, #33, #35, #38, #40, #45, #56, #57, #65, #75 and #76) of 34 residents who reside on the Buckeye secured unit and had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The facility census was 76.Findings include:1. Tour of the Buckeye secured unit on 05/18/26 at 8:07 A.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #721 of the resident rooms revealed: - Scrape damage and missing paint on the wall surfaces of Resident #75's room.- Scrape damage and missing paint on the wall surfaces of Resident #1's room and missing molding.- Scrape damage and missing paint on the wall surfaces of Resident #20's room.- Scrape damage and missing paint on the wall surfaces of Residents #40 and #45's room.- Scrape damage and missing paint on the wall surfaces of Residents #7 and #38's room.- Scrape damage and missing paint on the wall surfaces of Resident #33's room.- Scrape damage and missing paint on the wall surfaces…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to honor Resident #1's preferences to heat up leftover food items. This finding affected one (Residents #1) of nine residents reviewed for preferences. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including fibromyalgia, depression and anxiety disorder. Resident #1 resided on the Buckeye secured unit.Review of Resident #1's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/03/26 for a regular diet, regular texture with thin liquids consistency and a house shake (supplement) with breakfast.Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition.Interview on 05/18/26 at 8:35 A.M. with Resident #1 revealed staff refused to heat up leftovers and she has had to throw food out. She indicated the Director of Nursing (DON) stated it was the facility policy. When questioned, she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #78's care plan was revised with individualized interventions to address his behaviors. This affected one (Resident #78) out of three residents reviewed for behaviors. The facility census was 76.Findings include:A review of Resident #78's clinical record revealed an admission date of 01/29/26 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, mood disorder, schizophrenia, pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, and morbid obesity. Resident #78 was discharged from the facility to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the current facility upon his discharge from the hospital. A review of Resident #78's clinical record revealed multiple nursing progress notes dated 02/14/26 to 05/01/26 that indicated Resident #78 had behaviors including agitation, yelling/screaming at staff, accusations of being poisoned by the staff, staff threatening bodily harm, voicing distrust of staff accurately administering his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #20 was provided adequate incontinence care. This finding affected one (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, muscle wasting and hypothyroidism. Resident #20 resided on the Buckeye secured unit.Review of Resident #20's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder.Observation on 05/18/26 at 6:56 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #732 and CNA #769 of Resident #20's morning activities of daily living including the resident's incontinence care revealed the staff used disposable wipes to cleanse the resident's peri area and coccyx. The staff stated they could not dry the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #29 and Resident #59's medications were administered as ordered by the physician resulting in a six percent error rate. This affected two out of five residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 76.Findings include:An observation of four nurses (Registered Nurse (RN) #733, RN #744 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #746, LPN #747) administer 30 medications to five residents (Resident #12, Resident #29, Resident #57, Resident #59, Resident #76) with 31 opportunities for error revealed two medication errors were observed resulting in a six percent error rate. 1. A review of Resident #59's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/30/24 with diagnoses including malnutrition, pleural effusion, cognitive communication deficit, cerebral infarction (stroke), transient ischemic attack (temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain), spastic hemiplegia affecting the right side (muscle weakness or stiffness affecting one side of the body), dysphagia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-08 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of dietary schedules, review of posted mealtimes, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient dietary staff to ensure meals were delivered in the scheduled time frame. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:1. Observations on 03/30/26 at 7:05 A.M., Dietary Aide #365 verified breakfast was scheduled to arrive on the Maple unit at 7:30 A.M., at the Pines rooms at 7:55 A.M. and in the Pines dining room at 8:10 A.M. This was consistent with posted tentative times for meals to arrive on the units.On 03/30/26, breakfast arrived on the Maple unit at 8:07 A.M.On 04/02/26 at 9:28 A.M., the cart containing the Pines dining room and Pines room meals arrived.On 04/02/26 at 9:05 A.M., [NAME] #370 and [NAME] #371 verified it was difficult to get meals out to the units at the scheduled times when there were two dietary staff working. Sometimes, like that day, there was a third person sent to the dietary department to provide assistance. The assistant that day, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #332,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to secure one of three medication storage rooms (Pines Unit) to prevent potential unauthorized resident entry. This had the potential to affect 25 residents (#1, #6, #7, #10, #15, #20, #23, #24, #25, #27, #31, #37, #39, #40, #43, #45, #49, #50, #52, #61, #63, #69, #72, #79, and #87) residing on the Pines Unit. The facility census was 73.Findings include:During observations conducted on 03/30/26 at 5:50 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #382 left the facility before the arrival of scheduled oncoming staff for the Pines Unit. The medication storage room on that unit was left unsecured and accessible (it was unknown what time she left or how long the medications were left unsecured). Follow up observations at 6:00 A.M. confirmed that medications were not secured inside the room, and several medications were left on the countertop, making them accessible to any resident entering the room. There were no residents observed around the medication storage room or the countertop at the time of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of menus/spreadsheets, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were adequately trained regarding scoop/portion sizes and failed to have sufficient tools available to accurately measure portion sizes. This had the potential to affect ten residents (Residents #6, #8, #19, #22, #28, #35, #36, #45, #62, and #69) who had orders for mechanical soft diets and 53 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #29, #30, #31, #33, #37, #39, #42, #43, #44, #46, #48, #51, #52, #55, #56, #58, #59, #60, #61, #63, #65, #66, #68, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75, #77, #79, #84, #86, and #87) as residents who received regular texture food. The facility census was 73.Findings include:Observations on 03/31/26 between 4:18 P.M. and 5:23 P.M. revealed the following as [NAME] #368 was placing scoops and utensils in the food for serving, she placed a size 16 scoop (equivalent to two ounces) in the mechanical soft meat. While doing so, [NAME] #368 referred to the scoop as three ounces. Dietary Manager #400…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and stored in a manner to prevent contamination. This affected/had the potential to affect 53 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #29, #30, #31, #33, #37, #39, #42, #43, #44, #46, #48, #51, #52, #55, #56, #58, #59, #60, #61, #63, #65, #66, #68, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75, #77, #79, #84, #86, and #87) of 73 residents who had orders for diets with regular texture. The facility census was 73.Findings include:1. During meal preparation and service observations on 03/31/26 between 4:18 P.M. and 5:23 P.M., [NAME] #369 was observed monitoring the temperature of foods. While taking food temperatures, the cord of the thermometer came into direct contact with potato wedges for approximately 30 seconds. The thermometer had been observed on multiple surfaces in the kitchen with only the probe part cleaned.During the dinner tray line on 03/31/26, when a plate with double portions was prepared, there was not sufficient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on review of personal funds balance, quarterly statements, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents with balances over $1800 received notifications to spend down. This affected two residents (#8 and #45) out of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 73.Findings include:Review of the quarterly statement dated 02/18/26 revealed Resident #8 had accumulated a balance of $5496.14 as of 01/02/26, $4892.15 as of 02/02/26 and a balance of $6133.00 as of 02/18/26. Review of the quarterly statement dated 02/18/26 revealed Resident #45 had accumulated a balance of $3289.76 as of 01/02/26 and $4558.80 as of 02/18/26. Interview on 04/06/26 at 9:51 A.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #301 revealed she was unable to provide documentation showing the residents and/or residents' representatives were provided written notice to spend down personal funds as required.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$50,389 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $13,438 — penalty dated 2024-12-18
• $36,951 — penalty dated 2024-12-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MORDECHAI WEISZ — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $501K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH