Manatawny Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 230 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 133 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 122.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, facility policy and procedure, hospital record reviews and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to monitor and assess a pressure ulcer present upon readmission causing actual harm to Resident 1 when the wound deteriorated and became infected causing septic shock for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident 1) Findings Include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Prevention of Pressure Ulcer/Injuries, revised July 2017, revealed conduct a comprehensive skin assessment upon admission, including skin integrity- any evidence of existing or developing pressure ulcers or injuries. Skin assessments should be done weekly by a licensed nurse. Inspect the skin on a daily basis when performing or assisting with personal care or ADLs. Review of Resident 1's clinical progress notes revealed nursing entry dated August 17, 2023 at 7:15 p.m. stating Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital and the left buttock noted to have an open area 1.2 x 1 x 4.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information on one of three nursing units (Unit A Medication Cart).Findings include:During an observation conducted on A Wing on March 18, 2026, at 8:33 a.m., a medication cart assigned to a licensed nurse (Employee E8) was observed unattended with the computer screen open, displaying residents' personally identifiable information (PII). Employee E8 was not present in the hallway or in the immediate vicinity of the medication cart, creating the potential for unauthorized access to resident information.During a second observation conducted on A Wing on March 19, 2026, at 8:45 a.m., a medication cart assigned to a licensed nurse (Employee E9) was again observed unattended with the computer screen open, displaying residents' personally identifiable information. Employee E9 was not present in the hallway or near the medication cart, creating the potential for unauthorized access.During an interview on March 19, 2026, at approximately 2:10 p.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure medications in two of two medication carts located in nursing unit A.Findings include:Review of the facility policy Administering Medication last revised April 2020 states During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide. No medication are kept on top of the cart.During an observation on Nursing Unit A on March 16, 2026, at 9:50 a.m., a medication cart was observed unlocked in the hallway outside a resident room with no nursing staff present in the immediate vicinity.During an interview on March 16, 2026, at 9:52 a.m., a licensed nurse (Employee E8) stated that the medication cart should have been locked. Employee E8 then secured the medication cart before responding to a resident call bell.During an observation on Nursing Unit A on March 17, 2026, at 8:37 a.m., a medication cart was observed unlocked in the hallway outside Resident 29's room. Crushed medication in a plastic cup was observed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based upon policy review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure infection control practices related to transmission-based precautions were implemented on one of four nursing units.Findings include:Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Guidance on Transmission-Based Precautions dated April 3, 2024, recommend Contact Precautions for patients with known or suspected infections that represent an increased risk of for contact transmission (the spread of infection through direct or indirect contact with contaminated environments). The recommendations advise wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately, including gloves and gown for all interactions that may involve direct contact with the resident or the resident's environment. The CDC recommends Droplet Precautions for patients known or suspected to be infected with pathogens (disease causing germs) transmitted by respiratory droplets, that are generated by a patient who is coughing, sneezing, or talking.The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program policy (revised in October 2018)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide dignity for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 80). Findings include: Observations of Resident 80's room on March 17, 2026, at 11:34a.m., 12:00 p.m., 1:16p.m., and 2:08 p.m. revealed Resident 80 in bed, with catheter bag hooked to the side of his bed visible from the door with no privacy bag cover. Interview with Employee 5 on March 17, 2026, at 2:08 p.m. confirmed that Resident 80 did not have a privacy cover on catheter bag. Interview with Nursing Home Administrator on March 19,2026 at 11:15 a.m. confirmed the above findings. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(j) Resident Rights. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing Services.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical records review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the comprehensive care plan intervention to prevent alteration in nutrition and/or hydration for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 89).Findings include: Review of Resident 89's medical diagnoses revealed diagnoses that include Parkinson's Disease (a disorder that affects movement caused by degeneration of nerve cells in the brain), Congestive Heart Failure, (CHF), (a condition when the heart cannot pump blood effectively), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, (COPD), (a progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), and Gastroesophageal Reflus Disease, (GERD), (a condition where stomach acid flows back into the esopagus). Review of Resident 89's records revealed a care plan dated March 9, 2026, documenting the resident is at nutritional risk related to Parkinson's CHF, COPD, GERD, and BMI (body mass index) of 35.9 indicating class II obesity. Interventions included monitor /record/report to MD signs/symptoms of malnutrition: including significant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, medication regimen review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the physician's medication order was followed for one of the eight residents reviewed (Resident 86).Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Administering Medications, last revised April 2020, states Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame.Review of Resident 86's physician order dated November 29, 2024, revealed an order for midodrine hcl oral tablet 5 milligrams (MG) (rases blood pressure), Give 5 mg by mouth two times a day for orthostatic hypotension (a condition characterized by a significant drop in blood pressure upon standing) BP HOLD for systolic blood pressure (top number) greater than 130.Review of the January's 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that for the month of January 2026, Resident 86 received midodrine 5 mg ten times outside of the written parameters. The dates are as follows Date Time SBPJanuary 08, 2026, 8:00 a.m. 132January 08, 2026, 5:00 p.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring of fluid restrictions for two of eight residents reviewed for nutrition/hydration needs (Resident 3 and Resident 9).Findings include:Review of facility policy, titled Weight Assessment and Interventions last revised September 2008 states the physician, and the multidisciplinary team will identify medical conditions and medications that may cause fluid and nutrient loss and/or inadequate availability of food or fluids.Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic diastolic heart failure (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs).Review of Resident 3's physician orders revealed an order for 1500 ml (milliliters) fluid restriction in 24-hour period, with an original start date of February 12, 2026. Per the order 840 ml of fluid was to be provided with meals and 660 ml to be provided by nursing staff.Review of Resident 3's February and March 2026 Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that necessary treatments were provided for two of five residents with a pressure ulcer (Residents 71 and 177). Findings include: Review of Resident 71's wound consult of January 27, 2025, revealed resident presented with a stage 3 pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss) of the left heel. The consult indicated a new order recommendation to cleanse with wound cleanser, apply betadine (antiseptic solution used to disinfect open wounds), and leave open to air daily and prn (as needed). Review of the physician's orders and TAR (treatment administration record) revealed that the order was not implemented. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on January 31, 2025, at 11:17 a.m. confirmed that the treatment order was changed during wound rounds, but the order was not put into place. Review of Resident 177's wound consult of January 20, 2025, revealed resident presented with a stage 2 pressure ulcer (shallow wound with partial thickness skin loss) of the sacrum (large,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe and homelike environment for one of the four units observed (Milestone Unit). Findings include: An observation on the Milestone unit conducted on January 28, 2025, revealed the following: At 11:51 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall by the window was observed with two holes measuring 3.0 x 5.0 inches and the other hole measuring 2.0 x 5.0 inches; 11:58 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall by the window was observed with one hole measuring 5.0 x 7.0 inches; and at 12:01 p.m., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall by the window was observed with two holes one measuring 2.0 x 11 inches and the other was 2.0 x 2.0 inches. An observation conducted on January 31, 2025, at 11:20 a.m., in the presence of Employee E3 revealed that the above observations on Milestone unit rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were still present. An interview conducted with Employee E3 on January 31, 2025, at 11:30 a.m. revealed that he/she was not aware nor informed of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 22 and 108). Findings include: Review of Resident 22's CRNP's (certified registered nurse practitioner) progress note of January 10, 2025, revealed that the resident was seen and examined for complaints of urinary retention. New order to insert foley catheter (sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) if needing straight catheterization (intermittent emptying of urine from the bladder using a small tube) for all three shifts. Additional progress note of January 10, 2025, revealed that a foley catheter was inserted for urinary retention. Review of CRNP progress note of January 21, 2025, revealed an order to remove the resident's catheter and complete a bladder scan (procedure used to assess the amount of urine retained within the bladder) every shift for three days related to a voiding trial. Review of progress note of January 22, 2025, revealed resident continues to retain urine per bladder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$25,140 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $25,140 — penalty dated 2023-08-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MORDECHAI WEISZ — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA