Greenwood Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing
276 Green Ave Extended, Lewistown, PA 17044 · For profit - Corporation · 134 certified beds · (717) 242-1416 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $21,491 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-27)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.8% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.2% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.3% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 31.6% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.3% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.6% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.8% | 68.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.0% | 22.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.5% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.11 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.58 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.1%CMS range 30.8–50.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 7.6–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 4.7–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 128.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
62 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered diagnostic testing for one of three residents reviewed (Resident CR1) and physician ordered medications that resulted in hospitalization for one of three residents reviewed resulting in harm (renal failure and digoxin toxicity) (Resident 1). Findings include: Closed clinical record review for Resident CR1 revealed physician documentation by Employee 2 (physician) dated January 20, 2025, at 12:35 PM that indicated Resident CR1 presented with a cough. The assessment indicated that Resident CR1 had a viral upper respiratory infection (URI, affecting the sinuses and throat). Physician orders included to obtain a chest x-ray. A telephone physician's order from Employee 3 (certified registered nurse practitioner) dated January 20, 2025, at 10:57 AM instructed staff to obtain an oropharyngeal specimen (a type of sample collection method used in medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for two of six Residents (Residents 1 and 3). Findings include: Interview with Resident 1 on June 1, 2026, at 11:00 AM, revealed that they often need to clean their own bathroom, because housekeeping does not clean it daily. Concurrent observations of Resident 1's room revealed the following; The toilet lid and seat had multiple spots of dried brown liquid located on them. The interior rim of the toilet bowl was noted to have multiple brown spots around it. A piece of tissue paper was noted to be on the floor in the bathroom. The privacy curtain had a very large, roughly round two-foot, dried brown stain on the corner of the privacy curtain During an interview with Employee 1, housekeeper, on June 1, 2026, at 11:19 AM, they indicated that resident rooms should be cleaned daily, however they often do not have enough housekeepers to clean each room daily, and this often means rooms get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services are provided in accordance with professional standards of practice, regarding physician ordered medications, for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings Include: Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA-a chronic autoimmune disorder causing immune system-driven inflammation, primarily leading to painful, stiff, and swollen joints) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (when the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood). Review of Resident 3's current physician orders revealed an order, dated December 1, 2025, for Humira (medication used to treat RA) 40mg/0.4ml (milligrams/milliliter), inject one application every 14 days for RA. Review of Resident 3's Medication Administration Records (MAR) for February 2026, March 2026, and April 2026, revealed the Humira was scheduled on the following dates and was signed off as not being given, with corresponding eMAR notes on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of a new medication order for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised May 2017, revealed, Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (when the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood). Review of Resident 1's physician note dated March 30, 2026, revealed that Resident 1 presented with a painful rash to her right buttocks. Further review of the note revealed Resident 1 was diagnosed with shingles (a viral infection that causes a painful rash) with a new order placed for Valacyclovir (antiviral medication), 1 gram by mouth,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policy and procedures, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items in a safe and sanitary manner, maintain equipment in a sanitary condition, and prepare food items in accordance with professional standards in the main kitchen (Main Kitchen of Facility) and maintain equipment in a safe and sanitary condition on one of five nursing units reviewed (400 Nursing Unit).Findings include: Initial tour of the facility's main kitchen with Employee 3, Dietary Manager, on January 5, 2026, at 10:00 AM revealed the following: The parts per million (PPM) test strips used to test for appropriate dishwasher sanitizer concentration that were included in a clean, plastic sheet protector with the dishwasher temperature documentation log had expired on August 1, 2025 An appliance identified by Employee 1 as a cooler where food trays are placed during tray line had an accumulation of dust on top of it. The bottom front vents had numerous dried food stains. The commercial coffee maker located on a stainless steel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered medications for one of 27 sampled residents, and skin integrity for one of 27 sampled residents (Residents 38 and 122). Findings include: Interview with Resident 122 on November 5, 2026, at 2:10 PM revealed concerns regarding very dry skin. Resident 122 stated that her arms, hands, and feet were very dry and itchy, especially on her elbows, and that no lotions or creams were ever applied to these areas. Concurrent observations revealed that Resident 122's hands, arms, and feet had flakey white skin that seemed to be peeling and flaking off. Clinical record review revealed Resident 122 had no documented assessments related to her dry skin or any interventions. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on January 7 at 2:30 PM confirmed that the resident did not have a treatment for dry skin in place at the time of the above interview. Clinical record review for Resident 38 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer COVID-19 immunizations to ensure residents were up to date with the most current available immunization for five of five residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3, 6, and 9), failed to maintain documentation of staff COVID-19 vaccination status, and provide evidence that staff were offered the COVID-19 vaccine or information on obtaining the COVID-19 vaccine. Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed that his last COVID-19 vaccine was a COVID-19 booster administered on May 31, 2024. Clinical record review for Resident 2 revealed that her last COVID-19 vaccine was a COVID-19 booster administered on November 10, 2021. Clinical record review for Resident 3 revealed that her last COVID-19 vaccine was a COVID-19 booster administered on October 21, 2022. Clinical record review for Resident 6 revealed that her last COVID -19 vaccine was a COVID-19 booster administered on May 20, 2024. Clinical record review for Resident 9 revealed that she had no documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to secure and confidential personal and medical information in the lobby area of the facility and for one of one resident reviewed for privacy concerns (Facility Main Lobby Area; Resident 12). Findings include: Observation of the main lobby area of the facility on January 5, 2026, at 12:30 PM revealed a binder titled Department of Health Survey Results, For Public Review. The binder contained the results of recent surveys of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility. Review of the contents of the binder revealed that the facility placed the full health survey and complaint survey results in the binder. Further review of the binder contents revealed a survey deficiency letter and associated Statement of Deficiencies (Form CMS-2567) for a survey completed on March 31, 2025. The letter noted the full resident's name and associated specific resident identifier for Resident 12 and 15 additional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate housekeeping services to ensure a clean, safe, and orderly environment on one of five nursing units (Medication and Medical Supply Area located on the 400 Nursing Unit).Findings include: Observation of the house stock medication and medical supply storage room located at the end of the 400 Nursing Unit on [DATE], at 9:25 AM revealed dust and debris accumulated on the floor and under the storage shelving. There were also pieces of various paper products discarded on the floor. Further observation of the area revealed various packaged medical items discarded on the floor that included: a shower cap, toothbrush, a nutritional drink that expired in [DATE], a catheter protector cap, and rolled gauze. The above information was reviewed in a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on [DATE], at 2:15 PM. 483.10(i)(1)-(7) Safe/clean/comfortable/homelike EnvironmentPreviously cited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received proper treatment for vision services for one of two residents reviewed for vision concerns (Resident 9).Findings include: Interview with Resident 9 on January 5, 2026, at 1:43 PM revealed that she had concerns with receiving timely vision services. Resident 9 stated they keep cancelling my cataract surgery and now they do not know when I can have it done. Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 9 on December 20, 2022. Review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed an ophthalmology consult dated November 27, 2024, noting Resident 9 had cataracts and needed surgery in both eyes. Review of the ophthalmology consult dated June 3, 2025, revealed the procedure was not performed due to Resident 9 eating breakfast. Further review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed no documentation that Resident 9's cataract procedure was rescheduled. The surveyor reviewed the above concerns with Resident 9's vision services during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to arrange for the necessary foot care for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 122).Findings include: Interview with Resident 122 on January 5, 2026, at 2:10 PM revealed that she had not seen the podiatrist in a very long time, and she thought her toenails were very long and in need of clipping. Resident 122 indicated that the left foot was worse than the right foot. Concurrent observation of Resident 122's toenails revealed that her right foot had multiple elongated toenails including the large toe and the middle toe, with toenails grown over the tip of the toe by 1 cm (centimeter). The left foot toenails were all noted to be overgrown with 1 cm of growth noted over the tips of the toes. All toenails appeared to have jagged edges. Review of Resident 122's clinical record revealed that the resident was last seen by podiatry on May 23, 2025. The progress note located on the podiatry consult stated, Non-professional treatment is hazardous to the patient.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 51 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify triggers related to a resident's diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, to provide culturally, competent, trauma-informed care, and to eliminate or mitigate re-traumatization for one of six residents reviewed for mood/behavior (Resident 4). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 4 revealed the facility admitted him on June 2, 2025. A diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event) was added to his diagnosis list on July 11, 2025. A review of Resident 4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment completed by the facility at specific intervals to determine care needs) assessment dated [DATE], indicated a diagnosis of PTSD for Resident 4. Review of Resident 4's care plan identified that he had a diagnosis of PTSD. There were no identified triggers (everyday situations that cause a person to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by one of three residents reviewed (Residents 4). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 4 revealed the facility admitted him on June 2, 2025. A diagnosis of Dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life) was added to his diagnosis list on June 26,2025. A review of Resident 4's quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated, October 18, 2025, indicated that Resident 4 had a diagnosis dementia. A review of Resident 4's care plan revealed that the facility failed to develop a person center care plan with individualized interventions related to his diagnosis of dementia. An Interview with the Director of Nursing on January 8, 2026, at 11:39 AM confirmed that the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent (100 Nursing Unit; Residents 21 and 46).Findings include: The facility's medication error rate was eight percent based on 25 medication opportunities with two medication errors. Review of Resident 46's current physician orders dated [DATE], indicated staff were to administer Centrum Silver Oral Tablet (multiple vitamin with minerals); give one tablet by mouth daily. Observation of Resident 46's medication administration pass on [DATE], at 9:12 AM revealed that Employee 1, licensed practical nurse, prepared the medications prior to administration. This preparation included a Senior Tab Multivitamin (house stock substituted for the Centrum Silver oral tablet per Employee 1). Employee 1 proceeded to administer the medication to Resident 46. Upon review, it was determined that the Senior Tab Multivitamin had expired in [DATE]. Review of Resident 21's current physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain dental services for one of nine residents reviewed for dental concerns (Resident 122).Findings include: Interview with Resident 122 on November 5, 2026, at 2:10 PM revealed that she was concerned about her teeth chipping and breaking. Concurrent observations of the resident's teeth revealed multiple teeth that appeared chipped and broken. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 122 had last received dental services on May 13, 2025. The exam indicated five teeth that were fractured and not restorable. The consultant requested a referral to an oral surgeon for radiographic imaging (images on a sensitive plate or film by X-rays, gamma rays, or similar radiation examination) and extractions of any teeth with a less than favorable prognosis. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on January 8, 2026, at 2:30 PM confirmed that there no evidence that a referral to an oral surgeon had been attempted. 28 Pa. Code 211.15 Dental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain professional dental services for three of nine residents reviewed for dental concerns (Residents 9, 28, and 125). Findings include: Interview with Resident 28 on January 6, 2026, at 11:47 AM revealed that she has decayed and broken teeth that cause her pain. She said the facility dentist has seen her and he is waiting for her to get her teeth pulled so he can start making her dentures. She said she has to see an oral surgeon that will accept her insurance. Observation of Resident 28 during the interview confirmed her statement that she has decayed and broken teeth. Interview with the Director of Nursing on January 7, 2026, at 2:21 PM revealed that Resident 28 has been seen by the dentist and by the oral surgeon and she would provide all the dental consultation notes. The facility provided the following documents related to Resident 28's dental visits: Review of dental consult documentation dated March 14, 2025, revealed that Resident 28 was seen by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility procedures, observation, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to follow proper infection prevention practices for foot care equipment for two of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 29 and 48). Findings include: Observation of the 500 Hall on January 7, 2026, at 11:08 AM revealed Employee 1, nurse aide (NA), retrieved nail clippers from a staff member standing near a med cart and began trimming Resident 48's fingernails. At 11:12 AM, Employee 1 walked over to Resident 29 and began to trim his fingernails. Review of the facility policy and procedure entitled Care of Fingernails/Toenails under the section titled Steps in the Procedure revealed that step 20 instructs staff to clean reusable equipment and supplies, and step 25 instructs staff to wash and dry hands thoroughly. Employee 1 did not clean the fingernail clippers or wash and dry her hands between each resident's nail care. Interview with Resident 29 on January 7, 2026, at 12:35 PM revealed that he does have his own personal nail clippers in his room, but he stated that they must have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the main kitchen and on one of three nursing units (100/300 solarium pantry). Findings include: The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Cooling Cooked Time/Temperature Control for Safety Foods and the FDA Food Code: for Food Employees stipulates that the FDA Food Code requires a two-step cooling process for cooked food: a two-hour rapid cool from 135 degrees Fahrenheit to 70 degrees Fahrenheit followed by a four-hour window where foods must be cooled to 41 degrees Fahrenheit or less. This means that within two hours, the food must be cooled from cooking temperature (135 degrees Fahrenheit) to 70 degrees Fahrenheit to eliminate risk of pathogen growth. Over the next four hours the food must be cooled from 70 degrees Fahrenheit to 41 degrees Fahrenheit or less. If 70 degrees Fahrenheit is reached before two hours, you have the remaining time to reach 41 degrees Fahrenheit or less. Observation of a walk-in freezer in the facility's main kitchen on March 25, 2025, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a clean, safe, and orderly environment on three of five nursing halls (100, 200, and 400 Nursing Halls, Residents 16, 42, 91, and 101). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 91 revealed that the facility admitted him on March 5, 2025. On March 25, 2025, at 12:10 PM the drywall to the right of Resident 91's wall heater was marred and gouged. Concurrent interview with Resident 91 revealed that this occurred before their admission. On March 26, 2025, at 1:59 PM the drywall was marred behind Resident 42's head of the bed. Concurrent interview with the Director of Nursing acknowledged the drywall concerns for both Resident 91 and 42. Observation of Resident 16's room on March 25, 2025, at 11:27 AM revealed marring and uneven drywall on the wall outside the bathroom and between the closets. The bathroom walls were also marred. A cobweb was observed hanging from the wall to the center ceiling light in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-31 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview it was determined the facility failed to employ qualified activity personnel to oversee the facility's activity program (Employee 6) Findings included: Interview with Employee 6, Activity Director, on March 28, 2025, at 12:17 PM revealed that she was promoted from her nurse aide position to the activity director on February 17, 2025. Interview with the Director of Nursing on March 28, 2025, at 1:00 PM confirmed that Employee 6's qualifications were a certified nurse aide and that she did not possess the regulatory qualifications required to oversee the facility's activity programs. The facility failed to employee a qualified activity professional. 28 Pa Code: 201.3 (i)(ii) Resident activities coordinator. 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(3) Management.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-31 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure routine prophylactic dental services for three of six residents reviewed for dental concerns (Residents 10, 39, and 109). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 39 revealed an admission MDS (an assessment completed at intervals by the facility to determine care needs of the resident) dated October 18, 2024, that indicated she was edentulous (had no teeth) and had upper and lower dentures. Further clinical record review revealed no evidence that Resident 39 was seen by a dental provider or afforded the opportunity to receive dental services for prophylactic (routine) care. Interview with the Director of Nursing on March 27, 2025, at 2:02 PM confirmed the above noted findings that there was no evidence Resident 39 was provided or afforded the opportunity for prophylactic dental services. Interview with Resident 10 on March 26, 2025, at 10:18 AM indicated that she had natural teeth, had a history of having five teeth extracted, but she had not received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a personal funds quarterly statement for one of one resident reviewed for personal funds concerns (Resident 25). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 25 revealed that her sister was designated as her first emergency contact and her responsible party. An active physician's order dated [DATE], assessed Resident 25 as incapable of understanding (her rights and responsibilities). Interview with Resident 25's sister on [DATE], at 11:44 AM revealed that she has never received an accounting statement of her sister's personal funds. Resident 25's sister confirmed that Resident 25's social security income is automatically forwarded to the facility for her care, and that she has obtained money from the business office to buy incidentals for her sister. Resident 25's sister stated that she did not know the balance in her sister's personal funds account. The surveyor reviewed the above…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to involve a resident in establishing advance directives for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 93). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 93 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a 5-day admission MDS (minimum data set, an assessment completed at periodic intervals of time to assess resident care needs) completed on [DATE], revealed facility staff assessed the resident as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Record review for Resident 93 also revealed a POLST (Pennsylvania orders for lift sustaining treatment) dated [DATE], that indicated Resident 93 desired to be a full code (attempt CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) when the person has no pulse and is not breathing). The POLST was signed by the resident's sister who was listed as an emergency contact and a responsible party in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, review of select policies and procedures, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and notify the appropriate agencies of an identified incident of potential resident misappropriation of property (money) for one of two residents reviewed for abuse concerns (Resident 36). Findings include: Review of the facility's active policy entitled Abuse Prevention Program, revealed it is the facility's policy to have the residents be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The policy indicates all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source will be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as defined by the current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. The individual conducting the investigation will at a minimum, review the completed documentation forms, review the resident's medical record to determine events leading up to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, a review of select personnel records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete required background check screening for one of five newly hired employees reviewed (Employee 3) Findings include: In accordance with Act 13 Elder Abuse Mandatory Reporting and Act 169 Criminal Background Checks, nursing facilities are required to obtain a criminal background check on all newly hired employees. Facilities are required to obtain the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) background check within 30 days of hire on all prospective employees. If the applicant has not been a Pennsylvania resident for the two years before application, they will need to have a PSP criminal history background check completed and a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Background Check. The facility policy entitled, Criminal History Background Check Policy, last reviewed without changes on January 29, 2025, revealed that if the applicant/employee has been a resident of Pennsylvania for more than two years, the criminal history…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide personal and oral hygiene assistance for dependent residents for three of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) concerns (Residents 110, 36, and 93). Findings include: Observation of Resident 110 on March 25, 2025, at 12:46 PM revealed that his fingernails were several millimeters longer than the tips of his fingers and were discolored. Interview with Resident 110 on the date and time of the observation revealed that he required the assistance of staff to trim his fingernails. Resident 110 stated that staff told him that they would trim them; however, no one has. Clinical record review for Resident 110 revealed a plan of care initiated by the facility on September 25, 2024, due to Resident 110's deficits in ADL self-care performance. Interventions listed on the plan of care instructed staff to check Resident 110's nail length and trim and clean his nails on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on family and staff interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the individual needs and interests for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 101). Findings include: An interview with Resident 101's responsible party revealed concerns that there are no activities in the evenings on the 200 hall, memory care unit. Review of the facility activity calendars for January, February, and March 2025, revealed that there were no activities scheduled after 4:00 PM. Interview with the Director of Nursing and the Activity Director on March 27, 2025, at 2:15 PM confirmed the above noted findings related to the activity program for Resident 101 and the 200 hall. The facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the needs of Resident101 and the 200 hall residents. 28 Pa. Code 201.29 (a) Resident rights
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered interventions and treatments for one of 24 residents (Resident 42); and regarding an implanted cardiac pacemaker for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 30). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 42 revealed current physician orders for the following: Geri sleeves to all four extremities and remove for care every shift for skin alterations Bilateral fall mats in place while resident was in bed every shift Observation of Resident 42 revealed the following: On March 26, 2025, at 1:55 PM Resident 42 was in bed resting. On March 27, at 1:05 PM Resident 42 was dressed in the solarium in their wheelchair. On March 27, 2025, at 2:06 PM Resident 42 was in bed resting. No Geri sleeves were observed on Resident 42's four extremities and no bilateral fall mats were observed while Resident 42 was in bed during the above observations. The above information was reviewed during an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent future falls or accidents for two of three residents reviewed for falls (Residents 93 and 110). Findings include: An interview and observation of Resident 93 on March 25, 2025, at 12:23 PM revealed she had been to the hospital recently for stitches in her head after she fell when she was trying to reach over and pick something up off the floor from the bed. A reddened area was observed on the right side of her eyebrow. Clinical record review for Resident 93 revealed a medical practitioner's note dated March 11, 2025, at 3:23 PM that indicated the resident was being seen as a follow up to an emergency room visit due to a fall with a laceration requiring eight stiches. Further clinical record review for Resident 93 revealed she was admitted to the facility from the hospital on May 8. 2024, after repeated falls at her prior place of living. Resident 93 was noted to have a fall in the facility on August 8, 2024, sustaining a skin tear to her elbow. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on closed clinical record review, select facility policies and procedures, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that intravenous catheters were assess and maintained per the resident plan of care for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 120). Findings include: Review of the policy entitled Midline Dressing Changes, last reviewed by the facility on January 29, 2025, indicates that the facility will change a resident's midline (an access line placed in an arm to administer medications) catheter 24 hours after its insertion, then every five to seven days. Nursing staff are to document the date and time of the dressing change, description of insertion site, and any noted complications. Review of Resident 120's clinical record revealed nursing documentation dated October 29, 2024, at 4:59 AM that indicated a midline was to be placed for intravenous (IV) access. The physician's order dated October 29, 2024, indicated nursing staff were to administer Rocephin (used to treat bacterial infections) 1 gm (gram) every day for 10 days through the IV.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and services for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 42). Findings include: According to the American Association for Respiratory Care proper cleansing of respiratory (nebulizer) equipment reduces infection risk. The longer a dirty nebulizer sits and is allowed to dry, the harder it is to clean thoroughly. Parts of the aerosol drug delivery device should be rinsed and then washed with soap and hot water after each treatment. Once completely dry, store the nebulizer cup and mouthpiece in a zip lock bag. Clinical record review for Resident 42 revealed the following current physician orders: Change the oxygen tubing weekly and as needed (PRN) every night shift every Sunday Change humidifier bottle (to help prevent dry nostrils [nose] while on oxygen) once weekly on Sunday during night shift and PRN Observation of Resident 42 revealed the following: On March 25, 2025, (Tuesday), at 12:15 PM Resident 42's oxygen tubing was dated March…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly assess the potential entrapment risks from the use of bed rails for one of five residents reviewed for accident hazards (Resident 10). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Bed Safety, last reviewed without changes on January 29, 2025, indicated that the facility would strive to provide a safe sleeping environment for the resident. The resident's sleeping environment shall be assessed by the interdisciplinary team, considering the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort, and freedom of movement, as well as input from the resident and family regarding previous sleeping habits and bed environment. Inspection by maintenance staff of beds and related equipment is part of the regular bed safety program to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks. The facility will ensure that bed side rails are properly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by two of three residents reviewed (Residents 39 and 99). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 39 revealed the facility admitted her on October 12, 2024. A diagnosis of Dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life) was added to her diagnosis list on October 22, 2024. A review of Resident 39's admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated October 18, 2024, indicated that the facility determined a care plan for dementia and cognitive loss would be developed. A review of Resident 39's care plan revealed that there was no indication that the facility had developed and implemented a person-centered care plan to address the resident's dementia and cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for one of two residents reviewed for infection control concerns (Resident 173). Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memo entitled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes, dated March 20, 2024, revealed that nursing care facilities are to use enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, gown and glove use) for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices (i.e., indwelling urinary catheters) during high-contact resident care activities regardless of their multidrug-resistant organism status. High-contact activity would include things like dressing, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs, wound care, or device care. Interview with Resident 173 on March 25, 2025, at 3:31 PM revealed that she has had a surgical wound open, that will not heal completely, since November 2024. Observation of Resident 173's room on the date and time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide bathing assistance for a dependent resident for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed a plan of care developed by the facility to address her deficits to perform activities of daily living (bathing, dressing, toileting, etc.) related to her diagnoses of dementia (disease that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life) and Parkinson's disease (a degenerative brain condition that affects muscle control and movement). The plan of care indicated that Resident 1 preferred a shower and that she required extensive assistance by staff for bathing or showering. Review of Resident 1's Task List (electronic documentation completed by nurse aide staff to record care for a resident's activities of daily living) documentation dated July, August, and September 2024, revealed that Resident 1 was to receive a shower weekly. The nurse aide staff documented the following: July 1, 2024, bed bath July 8, 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered vital signs for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed a physician's order dated May 2, 2024, for vital signs (measurements of the body's most basic functions to include body temperature, pulse rate, respiration rate, and blood pressure) to be completed every eight hours for three days. Review of Resident 1's clinical documentation revealed that the facility only obtained his vital signs on May 2, 2024, at 6:00 PM, during the three days that they were to be obtained, from May 2-5, 2024. The Director of Nursing confirmed the above noted findings during an interview on May 29, 2024, at 11:25 AM. 28 Pa. Code 211.10(c) Resident care policies 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to store food to prevent the potential spread of food borne illness and maintain food service/storage equipment in a sanitary manner in the facility's main kitchen and one of three dining areas nursing units (100/300 dining room). Findings include: An observation of the facility's main kitchen on March 26, 2024, at 9:58 AM revealed the following: A large white bin next to the ice machine contained a white powdery substance. The bin was labeled as flour and dated September 7, 2023, with a use by date of March 7, 2024. An additional white bin next to the flour also contained a white powdery substance and was not labeled or dated. Employee 7, dietary manager, indicated it was thickener in the bin. An air vent on the front of the industrial ice machine was covered in dust on the exterior and interior of the vent. The lower shelf of a preparation table holding a food processor was dusty and contained dried particles on the shelf. A shelf extending from the wall over the above preparation table was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident or resident representative received written notice of the facility bed hold policy at the time of transfer for three of six residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents 41, 75, and 221). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 41 was transferred to the hospital on November 8, 2023, after they had a change in condition. There was no documentation available that the facility provided written notice regarding a bed hold to the resident and/or the resident's responsible party upon transfer out to the hospital. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 221 was transferred to the hospital on March 1, 2024, after they had a change in condition. There was no documentation available that the facility provided written notice regarding a bed hold to the resident and/or the resident's responsible party upon transfer out to the hospital. The surveyor reviewed the above information for during an interview with the Director of Nursing on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide bathing assistance for residents dependent on staff assistance for five of six residents sampled for activities of daily living (Residents 52, 60, 64 and 96), and the facility failed to provide a resident with transfer assistance out of bed for a resident dependent on staff assistance, for one of six residents sampled. (Resident 92). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 60 revealed that he is to have a bed bath on Fridays dayshift due to wound dressings. Review of Resident 60's care plan for self-care deficit revealed that he required one assist with his activities of daily living. He also had a care plan intervention that indicated he was to receive a bed bath related to dressings on both of his lower legs. Review of Resident 60's task documentation (computerized documentation of care that is done for the resident) revealed that he did not have his complete bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized person-centered care plans to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by four of four residents reviewed (Residents 17, 43, 44, 94). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 17 revealed the facility admitted her on July 19, 2022, with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life). A review of Resident 17's most recent annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated June 9, 2023, indicated that the facility assessed Resident 17 as having a diagnosis of dementia. The facility determined that a care plan for dementia and cognitive loss would be developed. A review of Resident 17's care plan revealed that there was no indication that the facility had developed and implemented a person-centered care plan to address…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select policies and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective Water Management Program for the prevention and control of water-borne contaminants, such as Legionella (a bacteria that may cause Legionnaires' Disease, a serious type of pneumonia). Findings include: The CDCs (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) current Water Management Program Toolkit, Practical Guide to Implementing Industry Standards, indicated that many buildings need a water management program to reduce the risk for Legionella (bacteria that can grow and spread in water systems and can cause a serious type of pneumonia (lung infection) known as Legionnaires' disease) growing and spreading within their water system and devices. Developing and maintaining a water management program is a multi-step process that requires continuous review. Steps to building an effective Legionella water management program include: A description of the building's water system using flow diagrams…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility staff education records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all nurse aide staff completed a minimum of 12 hours of in-service education training each year for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Employees 1, 2, and 3). Findings include: During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on April 12, 2023, at 2:00 PM the surveyor requested evidence of annual in-service education for the three nurse aide staff as follows: Employee 8, nurse aide, hired March 14, 2022. Employee 9, nurse aide, hired December 7, 2021. Employee 10, nurse aide, hired January 31, 2022. Interview with the Director of Nursing on March 29, 2024, at 11:00 AM confirmed that the facility had no evidence of any in-service education for Employees 8, 9, or 10, that included dementia training, abuse prevention training, and any areas of weakness or resident special care needs in the past year. 483.95 (g)(g 1-4) Training requirements Previously cited 4/14/23 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, review of employee personnel records, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate a resident's injuries of unknown origin for one of 25 residents sampled (Resident 75) and failed to implement its abuse prohibition policy pertaining to screening for one of five newly hired employees reviewed (Employee 1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Abuse Prevention Program, last reviewed January 4, 2024, revealed all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment, and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) will be thoroughly investigated by facility management. The current facility policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation last reviewed without changes on January 4, 2024, revealed that the facility will not tolerate abuse, neglect, exploitation of its residents or the misappropriation of resident property and will undertake background checks on all employees. Prior to hiring a new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 110). Findings include: Review of Resident 110's clinical record revealed the facility admitted her on January 12, 2024. A review of Resident 110's admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated January 18, 2024, noted staff assessed Resident 110 as utilizing a limb restraint less than daily. Observation of Resident 110 on March 26, 2024, at 11:04 AM, and March 27, 2024, at 9:42 AM revealed no evidence of a limb restraint. Review of Resident 110's physician orders did not include evidence of Resident 110 utilizing a restraint. An interview with the Director of Nursing on March 28, 2024, at 10:52 AM confirmed the MDS was incorrect, and Resident 110 never utilized a restraint. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to maintain the highest practicable care for one of one resident reviewed (Residents 50). Findings Include: Clinical record review for Resident 50 revealed a psychiatry note dated [DATE], that indicated she wanted to die so she can be with her babies. The note indicated that she did not have a plan and that she stated she would never harm herself. Further review of the psychiatry note revealed that Resident 50 indicated that she mourns her son's death. She stated he died one- and one-half days after he was born, and she never got to hold him. She also reported that she mourns the loss of multiple pregnancies that ended in miscarriage and cycles through the grieving process when the anniversary date of these events occurs. The note also indicated that she hears her deceased mother's voice and seeing her deceased mother from time to time.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to promote resident and/or responsible party involvement with care plan development for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 101). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 101 revealed that the facility conducted care plan meetings for her on August 4, 2023, September 6, 2023, and November 20, 2023. During a telephone interview with Resident 101's responsible party on March 26, 2024, at 1:51 PM she revealed that she only attended one care plan meeting and that she did not get invited to other ones. She indicated that she had to invite herself to the one she did attend by requesting a meeting. The Director of Nursing (DON) was made aware of the concern related to Resident 101's care plan meetings on March 27, 2024, at 2:00 PM. The Director of Nursing provided the surveyor with evidence that Resident 101's responsible party attended a meeting on March 18, 2024. The DON also confirmed at this time that this was a meeting that was requested by Resident 101's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain a resident's range of motion for one of 5 residents reviewed (Resident 44). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed a quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated August 2, 2023, noting staff assessed Resident 44 as having no upper or lower extremity impairments. Review of physical therapy documentation revealed Resident 44 was discharged from physical therapy on August 4, 2023. A review of Resident 44's physical therapy discharge summary revealed his prognosis to maintain his current level of function would be good with consistent staff follow-through. The physical therapy discharge summary noted the facility does not offer restorative nursing programs. Further review of Resident 44's clinical record revealed his next quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], nursing staff assessed Resident 44 as having a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of select facility policies, facility documents, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions to prevent falls for one of five residents reviewed for falls (Resident 52). Findings include: In an interview an observation of Resident 52 on March 26, 2024, at 1:33 PM the resident was observed in bed with several steri strips (strips used to heal wounds by pulling two sides of a wound together) on his left hand. Resident 52 stated he fell out of bed a couple days ago. Clinical record review for Resident 52 revealed a nursing note dated March 20, 2024, at 4:11 PM, which noted when the resident was being changed, the resident rolled out of bed, landed on his knees, then rolled onto his right side, and hit his head on the wheel of the bed. It was also noted the resident's knees were red and excoriated, and a hematoma was present on the left side of his head. A nursing note dated March 21, 2024, at 1:14 AM for Resident 52 noted the resident's hand was assessed status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and implement individualized interventions to promote bowel and bladder continence for one of two residents reviewed for incontinence (Resident 115). Findings include: On March 29, 2024, at 12:35 PM The Director of Nursing (DON) indicated that the facility did not have a policy on evaluating resident bowel and bladder incontinence. Clinical record review for Resident 115 revealed a care plan that was initiated on March 4, 2024, that indicated she was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Further clinical record review for Resident 115 revealed a bowel and bladder program screener dated March 9, 2024, that indicated she was always continent of bladder and never incontinent of bowel. Care plans initiated March 4, 2024, indicated that Resident 115 is incontinent of bowel and incontinent of bladder. Review of Resident 115's task documentation (computerized documentation of the care provided) revealed that Resident 115 was documented as being incontinent of bowel 15 times and bladder 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to promote acceptable parameters of nutrition for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 42). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 42 on January 23, 2024. Further review of Resident 42's clinical record revealed the following weight assessments: January 23, 2024, 145 pounds January 29, 2024, 127.8 pounds (a 17.2 pound, an 11.8 percent severe weight loss) January 30, 2024, 127.8 pounds February 2, 2024, 127.0 pounds February 7, 2024, 124.2 pounds February 13, 2024, 122.6 pounds Further review of Resident 42's clinical record revealed a nutrition progress note dated January 30, 2024, which noted resident showing a weight loss, request a re-weight. A nutrition progress note dated January 31, 2024, revealed Resident 42 was noted to have a 16.8-pound weight loss over seven days. The registered dietician recommended fortified foods for added calories for weight stabilization. An addendum was added to the note indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and services for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 75). Findings include: Observation of Resident 75 on March 27, 2024, at 9:39 AM revealed Resident 75 was in her room with oxygen on and running at 3 liters per minute. Observation of Resident 75 on March 27, 2024, at 10:28 AM revealed she was in the dining room without oxygen. Further observation revealed Resident 75's oxygen was running in her room at 3 liters per minute, with the nasal cannula tubing lying across Resident 75's bed. Review of Resident 75's clinical record revealed there was no physician's order for Resident 75 to receive oxygen. An interview with Employee 5 (assistant director of nursing) confirmed the above findings for Resident 75. Employee 5 indicated she was unsure when staff began administering Resident 75's oxygen but noted documentation in Resident 75's clinical record that Resident 75 utilized oxygen starting on March 22, 2024. Nursing staff obtained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered pain medications for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 91). Findings include: Review of Physiopedia's and Wikipedia's definition of the numeric pain rating scale (parameters) from zero to 10 indicated that no pain was identified as zero, mild pain was identified as one to three, moderate pain was identified as four to six, and severe pain was identified as seven to 10. Clinical record review for Resident 91 revealed physician's orders for the following pain medications: Ordered on April 20, 2023, Acetaminophen (Tylenol, for mild pain) 325 milligrams (mg) 2 tablets by mouth (PO) every 6 hours as needed (PRN) for pain 1-4. Ordered on August 8, 2023, and discontinued on July 15, 2024, Tramadol (for moderate to severe pain) 50 mg PO every 4 hours PRN for pain. Ordered on January 15, 2024, Tramadol (for moderate to severe pain) 50 mg PO every 4 hours PRN for pain 6-10. Review of Resident 91's August, September, October,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observations, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the availability of necessary emergency supplies for two out of three residents reviewed receiving hemodialysis (Residents 70 and 90). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 70 revealed the resident had an AV fistula (a connection that's made between an artery and a vein for dialysis access) in his left wrist for dialysis treatment. A physician's order for Resident 70 dated March 22, 2024, indicated the resident was to receive hemodialysis (a machine that performs a basic function of the kidney by cleansing the blood of impurities) every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday at a dialysis center. An additional physician's order dated March 22, 2024, indicated the resident was to have and emergency dialysis kit at bedside to contain two sterile 4x4's, hemostats (a tool used to control bleeding), and tape, and to replace the kit if needed. An observation and interview with Resident 70 on March 26, 2024, at 2:50 PM the resident stated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify triggers related to a resident's diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, to provide culturally, competent, trauma-informed care and eliminate or mitigate re-traumatization for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 50). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 50 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment completed by the facility at intervals to determine care needs of the resident) assessment dated [DATE], that indicated she had an active diagnosis of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome, a mental and behavioral disorder that develops from experiencing a traumatic event). Interview with Resident 50 on [DATE], at 10:35 AM revealed that she has PTSD from being raped by her mom's brother and by her father, after her mother died. She also indicated that she was beaten in a past relationship. A psychiatric note dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 50 indicated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff and family interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess for the risk of side rail entrapment, for three of five residents reviewed for side rails (Residents 74, 104, and 105). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 105 revealed that she was admitted on [DATE], with an assessment that indicated she did not need to utilize side rails. On January 30, 2024, a physician ordered Resident 105 to utilize bilateral (both sides) side rails to (her) bed for positioning. There was no documentation after the January 30, 2024, order that indicated the bilateral side rails were assessed to ensure the side rails were appropriate and the resident's ability to utilize them. Observation of Resident 105 on March 26, 2023, at 12:03 PM revealed that she was dressed and sitting in a chair. There were bilateral side rails observed on the bed. The surveyor reviewed the above information during an interview with the Director of Nursing on March 29,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the care and assessment of residents with enteral tube feeding, catheter care, medication administration, and dressing changes for two of six employee competencies reviewed (Employees 11 and 12). Findings include: A review of the facility documentation revealed that the facility had a total of 124 residents receiving medications, 10 residents with indwelling catheters (insertion of a tube into the bladder to remove urine), six residents with pressure ulcers, and two residents with enteral tube feedings (device that allows liquid food to enter your stomach or intestine through a tube). A request for nursing staff competencies for enteral tube feeding, catheter care, medication administration, and dressing changes revealed the facility was unable to provide any for Employees 11 and 12 (licensed practical nurses). The findings were reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff and responsible party interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor antibiotic use for one of one resident reviewed for a urinary tract infection (Resident 74). Findings include: In an interview with a responsible party for Resident 74 on March 26, 2024, at 1:01 PM, the responsible party indicated the resident had been sick and had to go to the hospital as she had a urinary tract infection. Clinical record review for Resident 74 revealed the resident was sent to the emergency room from the facility on February 13, 2024, for abdominal pain, and not eating. Review of Resident 74's emergency room visit summary dated February 13, 2024, revealed the resident received multiple studies and lab work at the emergency room, which included a urinalysis with culture and sensitivity and results were pending. The resident was returned to the facility with a diagnosis of hypernatremia (an elevated sodium level), headache, and loss of appetite. Resident 74 received intravenous fluids at the emergency room and was returned to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received or was offered pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for one of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Resident 4). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 4 revealed that the facility admitted her on October 6, 2022. Further clinical record review revealed that the facility documented on admission that Resident 4 previously had a pneumovax 23 (a vaccine administered to prevent pneumonia) on March 1, 2007. There was no evidence in Resident 4's clinical record that indicated she was offered pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (vaccines that prevent against bacteria that cause pneumonia) Review of the document published April 1, 2022, by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, entitled Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults, Resident 4 should have been offered a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Interview with Employee 2, Registered Nurse, Infection Preventionist, on March 29, 2024, at 12:30 PM confirmed the above noted findings for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed that she was diagnosed with end stage kidney failure, which required dialysis. Further review revealed that she tested positive for COVID-19 on December 16, 2023, while in the facility, and was placed on isolation. She attended dialysis on December 18, 2023. Upon return from dialysis on December 18, 2023, at 9:57 PM, staff documented that Resident 1 left for dialysis via a non-emergent transport company at 3:20 PM and returned from dialysis via the non-emergent transport company at 7:20 PM . The non-emergent transport company stated they were unaware of Resident 1 being COVID-19 positive upon returning to facility this evening. The non-emergent company (stated) that dialysis (was) also unaware as Resident 1 was not isolated nor masked at dialysis. Review of dialysis and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assist a resident to retain and use personal possessions for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 2). Findings include: Observation of Resident 1 and 2's bathroom on August 16, 2023, at 3:20 PM and concurrent interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed that there were many unlabeled/unidentified resident personal care items located in a plastic basin on the floor under the sink, in a graduated plastic container on the right side of the sink, and in a woven wooden basket with a clothe interior sitting on top of the toilet. These resident personal care items included shampoo, lotion, toothpaste, denture gel, and skin barrier creams. The toothpaste, denture gel, and one container of lotion were missing their lids and had the contents of the respective items on the outside of the container. There was a lid lying in the sink which was identified by the DON as the lid to the denture gel. There was an unidentified/labeled white denture cup that was closed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the State Ombudsman of a transfer to the hospital with the required information for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 77, 93, and 110). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 77 revealed that they were transferred to the hospital on February 13, 2025, after there was a change in their condition. There was no documentation that the facility provided written notification to the State Ombudsman as required regarding the transfer. The above information was reviewed during an interview with the Director of Nursing on March 28, 2025, at 10:51 AM. Clinical record review for Resident 93 revealed the resident was sent to the hospital on February 6, 2025, for a change in condition and admitted . There was no documentation that the facility provided written notification to the State Ombudsman as required regarding the transfer. The Director of Nursing confirmed the above findings for Resident 93 in an interview on March 27, 2025, at 12:48 PM. Clinical record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident and/or their responsible party in writing of a transfer to the hospital for four of six residents reviewed (Residents 41, 60, 75, and 221). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 41 revealed that they were transferred to the hospital on November 8, 2023, after a change in their condition. There was no documentation that the facility provided written notification to the resident or the resident's responsible party regarding the transfer that included the required contents: the reason for the transfer, the effective date of the transfer, the location to which the resident was transferred, contact and address information for the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and information for the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of individuals with developmental disabilities. Clinical record review for Resident 221 revealed that they were transferred to the hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$21,491 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $21,491 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MORDECHAI WEISZ — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROSCOE, BRANDON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2021 |
| WEISZ, MORDECHAI | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2021 |
| BAXTER, JARED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/05/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395373. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.