Oak Hill Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing
1020 North Union Street, Middletown, PA 17057 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 136 certified beds · (717) 944-0451 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Jun 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 6 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $61,932 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-30)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.4% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.5% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 43.5% | 10.8% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.3% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.5% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.4% | 25.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 28.7% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 54.6% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.5% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.8% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.43 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.37 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 59.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.3%CMS range 42.0–59.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 7.7–16.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 59.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.8–13.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.87 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 136 beds and averages 127.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services consistent with professional standards of practice to ensure the resident's highest level of well-being, which resulted in harm as evidenced by a delay in sending the resident to the hospital following confirmation of a femur fracture, and by failure to provide appropriate pain assessment and management for the fracture, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include:Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia (a progressive cognitive and mental decline that is severe enough to interfere with daily life, affecting memory, thinking, language, and judgment). Resident 1 resided on the locked memory care unit at the facility. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident 1 had a fall on August 26, 2025, at 4:45 PM. Resident 1 complained of pain in her right thigh and had an x-ray (an imaging test that uses a small…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, review of facility investigation documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect, which resulted in actual harm as evidenced by bilateral lobe pneumonia with small left-sided effusion (a collection of fluid around the lungs) for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of the current facility policy, titled Pre-Thickened Liquids Policy, read in part, Pre-thickened liquids will be provided at bedside in individual packaged containers per physician orders. Pre-thickened liquids will be offered between meals per physician orders. Review of facility's Guidelines for Volunteers, revealed instructions that the facility volunteers Do not give a resident food or drink, whether or not they ask for something specific, without asking the resident's nurse first. Review of facility policy, titled Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol, dated July 2017, revealed 'Neglect', as defined at §483.5, means 'the failure of the facility, its…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, review of facility incident report, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident receives, and the facility provides, drinks prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for two of 10 residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 2), which resulted in actual harm to Resident 1, experiencing bilateral lobe pneumonia (an infection that inflames the lungs' air sacs) with small left-sided effusion (a collection of fluid around the lungs). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Pre-Thickened Liquids Policy, read in part, Pre-thickened liquids will be provided at bedside in individual packaged containers per physician orders. Pre-thickened liquids will be offered between meals per physician orders. Review of facility's Guidelines for Volunteers, revealed instructions that the facility volunteers Do not give a resident food or drink, whether or not they ask for something specific, without asking the resident's nurse first. Review of Resident 1's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record and hospital record review, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, which resulted in actual harm, evidenced by a urinary tract infection and septic shock for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), and failed to follow physician orders for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Collecting a Urine Specimen from a Closed Drainage System, read, in part, The purpose of this procedure is to obtain an uncontaminated urine specimen from a resident with a catheter. The policy included steps in the specimen collection procedure to prevent specimen contamination. These steps included Wash your hands thoroughly before beginning the procedure, cleanse the speci-port with the alcohol swab, do not touch the inside of the specimen container, place the lid on the specimen container, do not touch the inside of the lid. Review of facility policy, titled Catheter Care, Urinary, last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, nurse aide job description review, clinical record review, review of facility investigation documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect, which resulted in actual harm as evidenced by a right femur fracture, for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Abuse Prevention Program, dated January 1, 2022, revealed Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation .'Neglect' is defined as failure to provide goods and services as necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness Signs of Actual Physical Neglect: 6. Inadequate provision of care. Review of facility's nurse aide job description revealed, Purpose of Your Job Position- To provide each of your assigned residents with routine daily nursing care and services in accordance with the resident's assessment and care plan . Review of Employee 1's education revealed Employee 1 was most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, nurse aide job description review, clinical record review, review of facility investigation documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents, which resulted in a fall and actual harm as evidenced by a right femur fracture, for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, undated, revealed Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: .b. Mobility (transfer and ambulation, including walking) . Review of facility's nurse aide job description revealed, Purpose of Your Job Position- To provide each of your assigned residents with routine daily nursing care and services in accordance with the resident's assessment and care plan . Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practical well-being by not following physician orders for daily weights for two of six residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 6).Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart cannot pump blood efficiently enough to meet the body's needs) and GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease - a chronic condition where stomach acid frequently flows back into the esophagus, causing irritation, heartburn, and potential damage). Review of Resident 1's physician's orders revealed an active order to obtain weight daily, report 2-3 lb (pound) weight gain overnight or weight gain of 5 lb in one week, with a start date of March 10, 2026. Review of Resident 1's care plan revealed the Resident was at risk for nutrition/hydration problems related to anxiety, chronic heart failure/stage 3 chronic kidney disease with therapeutic diet, GERD, weight changes caused by fluid, fluid restriction, diuretics…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy reviews, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication orders were limited to 14 days for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1); failed to provide side effect monitoring for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 3 and 128); failed to inform resident representatives of initiating psychotropic medication for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 14); and failed to ensure that the resident was free from chemical restraints imposed for the purposes of convenience for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 128). Findings include: Review of facility provided policy, titled Policy for Psychotropic Use in Long-Term Care (LTC), with a last review date of August 18, 2025, revealed its purpose was to ensure the safe and appropriate use of psychotropic medications in residents of Long-Term Care (LTC) facilities, in compliance with regulatory standards and best practice guidelines, while promoting the well-being and rights of residents. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services are provided in accordance with professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for four of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 4, 9 and 14).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Wound and Skin Care with a last review date of August 18, 2025, revealed, 3. For new admissions that do not have a pressure area/ulcer, the resident's skin will be monitored weekly through the nurses' skin assessments. Identified issues will be followed through skin program. Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning) with agitation and depression. Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed a laboratory order for complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic profile lipid panel, hemoglobin A1C,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to manage or prevent pain consistent with professional standards of practice and the resident's goals and preferences for one of one residents reviewed (Resident 69).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Pain Assessment and Management, with a last review date of August 18, 2025, revealed, in part, Pain management is defined as the process of alleviating the resident's pain to a level that is acceptable to the resident and is based on his or her clinical condition and established treatment goals. Conduct a comprehensive pain assessment upon admission to the facility, at the quarterly review, whenever there is a significant change in condition, and when there is onset of new pain or worsening of existing pain. The pain management interventions shall be consistent with the resident's goals for treatment. Such goals will be specifically defined and documented. If pain has not been adequately controlled, the multidisciplinary team, including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for two of two residents reviewed (Residents 42 and 53).Findings include:Review of facility policy, titled Hemodialysis, without implementation or review date, revealed, The facility will immediately contact and communicate with the attending physician, resident/ representative, and designated dialysis staff (i.e. nephrologist, registered nurse) any significant changes in the resident's status related to clinical complications or emergent situations that may impact the dialysis portion of the care plan.Review of Resident 42's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included heart failure (when your heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should) and end stage renal disease (when the kidneys no longer function normally).Review of Resident 42's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility personnel documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed at least annually for five of five nurse aides reviewed (Employees 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7).Findings Include: Review of personnel information revealed that Employee 3's hire date was December 7, 2021; Employee 4's hire date was February 21, 2022; Employee 5's hire date was February 6, 2024; and Employee 6's hire date was October 11, 2022; and Employee 7's hire date was March 7, 2022. Further review of personnel information for Employees 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, failed to reveal that annual performance reviews were completed. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on December 4, at 12:00 PM, he acknowledged that he had no additional documentation to provide for the selected employees. He confirmed that he would expect annual performance reviews to be completed around an employee's date of hire.28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management28 Pa. Code…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise the resident plan of care for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 4 and 80). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, with a last review date of August 18, 2025, read, in part, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. Review of facility policy, titled Pacemaker, Care of a Resident with, with a last review date of August 18, 2025, revealed, in part, Pacemakers are electronic devices that artificially stimulate the heart muscle with electrical impulses when the heart rhythm is too slow. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 4).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, with a last review date of August 18, 2025, revealed, in part, Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 4's care plan revealed a care plan focus for at risk for falls with a last revision date of January 4, 2024. Interventions included, but were not limited to, bilateral fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents receive appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections in residents with a foley catheter for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 15).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Catheter Care, Urinary, with a last review date of August 18, 2025, revealed, in part, Be sure the catheter tubing and bag are kept off the floor. The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: the date and time care was given and the name and title of the individual(s) giving the catheter care. Review of Resident 15's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included prostate cancer and Lewy Body dementia (a chronic disorder of mental processes caused by protein build-up in the brain, and marked by visual hallucinations, rigid muscles, slow movement, memory disorders, personality changes, and depression). Observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, resident and staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine and emergency dental services for one of one resident reviewed for dental services (Resident 81).Findings: Review of facility policy, titled Dental Services, revised December 2016, read, in part, selected dentists must be available to provide follow-up care. Social services representatives will assist residents with appointments. Review of resident 81's clinical record documented diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (progressive brain disorder that slowly damages nerve cells, causing a gradual loss of memory, thinking and language abilities), adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), and depression (feelings of severe despondency and dejection). Interview with Resident 81 on December 1, 2025, at 11:15 AM, revealed she hadn't seen a Dentist for two missing upper right teeth; they were to be replaced. Review of census documentation revealed Resident 81's payor source was Medicaid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings Include:Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included type II diabetes mellitus (condition characterized by high blood sugar levels due to insulin resistance and relative lack of insulin production) and muscle weakness (muscles aren't as strong as they should be).Review of Resident 1's June 2025 MAR (Medication Administration Records - forms used to document physician orders as well as when and how medications are administered to a resident) revealed an order for Ozempic subcutaneous solution (medication that mimics a hormone that lowers blood sugar) every Sunday for diabetes mellitus.Further review of the MAR revealed that nursing staff documented 9 other/see note on Sunday June 22, 2025, and Sunday June 29, 2025. Review of Resident 1's progress notes failed to reveal further documentation for the aforementioned dates. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility dietary manual review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a meal that was designed to meet the needs of residents requiring a mechanical soft meal, and failed to provide a pureed meal for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of the facility's dietary manual, section titled, Menus, revealed the facility's policy stated, .Menus are implemented by the Dietary Manager in conjunction with the Dietician . Further, review of subsection titled, Mechanical Soft Diet, stated, Purpose: The mechanical diet is modified in consistency to reduce the amount of chewing required to consume food. Review of the planned menu for April 22, 2025, lunch meal, revealed the mechanical soft lunch was to include ground chicken enchilada casserole and ground black beans. Review of the recipe for the chicken enchilada casserole revealed it included the instructions of, Mechanical Soft Steps: Remove desired number of servings to chop for the mechanical soft diets. Use a knife/fork or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident is included and provided the right to participate in the person-centered care planning process for two of 32 residents reviewed (Residents 25 and 31). Findings Include: Review of the facility's New admission Introduction & Handbook, provided to each resident and/or his representative at admission read, in part, Care plans are created for each resident on admission, reviewed quarterly . You should expect to be invited to participate in Care Plan Meetings routinely. A review of Resident 25's physician's orders revealed diagnoses that included muscle weakness and chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition that occurs when the kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood properly). An interview with Resident 25, on November 18, 2024, at 11:02 AM, revealed he did not recall being invited to his recent quarterly care plan meeting. A review of Resident 25's clinical record failed to reveal any documentation of the Resident's recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of non-coverage (SNF-ABN) form to two of three residents to inform those residents of items and services no longer deemed eligible for coverage under Medicare A (Residents 2 and 108). Findings Include: A review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed the last covered day of Medicare A services dated September 1, 2024. Review of the facility's provided notice, revealed the facility did not offer the Resident the SNF-ABN form as Resident 2 was planning to remain in the skilled nursing facility and receive skilled services. A review of Resident 108's clinical record revealed the last covered day of Medicare A services dated August 9, 2024. Review of the facility's provided notice, revealed the facility did not offer the Resident the SNF-ABN form as Resident 108 planned to remain in the skilled nursing facility and receive skilled services. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on November 19,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for four of 32 residents reviewed (Residents 33, 37, 46 and 67). Findings include: Review of Resident 33's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (long-term movement disorder where the brain cells that control movement start to die and cause changes in how one moves, feels, and acts) and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (insufficient protein intake or protein deficiency). Review of Resident 33's recorded weights revealed that she weighed 100.8 pounds on February 13, 2024, and 89.4 pounds on August 18, 2024, which represented a significant weight loss of 11.31% in this approximately six month period. Review of Resident 33's August 24, 2024, 5 day MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental or psychosocial needs) revealed that a weight of 89 pounds was recorded on this assessment. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for two of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 64 and 84). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Wound Care, last reviewed September 25, 2024, read, in part, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing, Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. The policy also states to wash and dry your hands thoroughly prior to the start of the procedure, after removing the soiled dressing, and at the end of the procedure. [NAME] tape with initials, time, date and apply to dressing. Review of Resident 64's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients your body needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for two of five residents reviewed for mobility (Residents 37 and 55). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Restorative Nursing Services, last reviewed September 25, 2024, read, in part, Residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services (e.g., physical, occupational or speech therapies). Restorative goals and objectives are individualized and resident-centered, and are outlined in the resident's plan of care. Review of Resident 37's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included contracture of left hand (a permanent tightening of the muscles,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding, including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers, for two of three residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident 53 and 67). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Enteral Nutrition, last reviewed September 25, 2024, read, in part, Adequate nutrition support through enteral nutrition will be provided to residents as ordered. Review of Resident 53's clinical record revealed diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infraction (weakness or the inability to move one side of the body due to blocked or reduced blood flow to the brain) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident 53's physician orders revealed an order for bolus feeding via gastrostomy tube (G-tube - a small flexible tube that is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a timely assessment for trauma and then develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to render trauma-informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for two of 32 residents reviewed (Residents 10 and 105). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Trauma-Informed Care, last revised September 25, 2024, read, in part, Policy Statement .Care will be provided in a manner that prevent re-traumatization and promotes healing and empowerment. Procedures 2. Resident Assessment and Care Planning: Incorporate trauma screening into resident assessments to identify potential trauma histories. Develop individualized care plans that account for trauma-related needs, preferences, and triggers. Review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess residents utilizing enabler bars/side rails for risk of entrapment, review the risks and benefits of the use of enabler bars/side rails with residents or their representatives, and obtain informed consent for enablers bars/side rails prior to use for two of three residents reviewed for use of enablers (Residents 84 and 105). Findings Include: A review of facility policy, Proper Use of Side Rails, undated, revealed, An assessment will be made to determine the resident's symptoms, risk of entrapment and reason for using side rails .The use of side rails as an assistive device will be addressed in the resident care plan .Consent for side rail use will be obtained from the resident or legal representative, after presenting potential benefits and risks. A review of Resident 84's physician's orders revealed diagnoses that included paraplegia (paraplegia is the loss of muscle function in the lower half of the body, including both legs, and morbid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that prescription medications and treatments were stored in locked compartments and only accessible by authorized personnel for three of 32 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 80, and 84). Findings Include: A review of facility policy, Self-Administration of Medications, revised December 2016, revealed, Staff shall identify and give to the Charge Nurse any medications found at the bedside that are not authorized for self-administration. A review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included pain and rash. An observation in Resident 2's room on November 18, 2024, at 10:42 AM, revealed a medication cup with a powder substance at the Resident's bedside. When an inquiry was made, Resident 2 stated staff leave the powder there in order to have it available for use for the rash under her breasts. An interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (Employee 3), at 10:45 AM, revealed the powder is used during resident care and should not be stored at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were implemented appropriately to maintain a safe and sanitary environment that supports infection prevention and control for one of 20 residents on enhanced barrier precautions (Resident 102) and residents not on enhanced barrier precautions (Residents 41 and 66). Findings include: Review of the facility policy. titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). effective April 1, 2024, stated, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following: Wounds or indwelling medical devices, regardless of MDRO colonization status. Effective implementation of EBP requires staff training on the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and the availability of PPE and hand hygiene supplies at the point of care. Observation during tour of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of side rails/enabler bars to identify areas of possible entrapment for two of three residents reviewed for side rails/enabler bars (Residents 43 and 105). Findings include: A review of facility policy, Proper Use of Side Rails, undated, revealed, When side rail usage is appropriate, the facility will assess the space between the mattress and side rails to reduce the risk for entrapment (the amount of safe space may vary, depending on the type of bed and mattress being used). A review of Resident 43's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included abnormalities of gait (the manner of a person's walking) and mobility (the ability to move freely) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). An observation of Resident 43's bed, on November 18, 2024, at 10:59 AM, revealed bilateral enabler bars attached to the Resident's bed. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on November 21, 2024, at 9:51 AM, revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, state regulation, resident and staff interviews, record review, policy review, and the facility's licensed staff scope of practice, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice when providing medication administration for 2 of 32 residents reviewed (Residents 31 and 84). Findings include: Review of the Pennsylvania Nursing Practice Act for Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), Chapter 21.145. revealed Functions of the LPN. (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound nursing judgement based on preparation, knowledge, experience in nursing and competency. The LPN participates in the planning, implementation and evaluation of nursing care using focused assessment in settings where nursing takes place. (1) An LPN shall communicate with a licensed professional nurse and patient's healthcare team members to seek guidance when the patient's care needs exceed the licensed practical nursing scope of practice. A review of the facility's policy, titled Administering Medications, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of two residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 22). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Oxygen Administration, last reviewed September 2024, read, in part, Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Review of Resident 22's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness that causes extreme mood shifts, including periods of mania and depression) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Observation of Resident 22 on November 18, 2024, at 10:38 AM, revealed the Resident was sitting in their room, using oxygen running at 4 liters per minute. Observation of Resident 22 on November 20, 2024, at 12:23 PM, revealed the Resident was sitting in their room, using oxygen running at 4 liters per minute.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services consistent with professional standards, and failed to maintain complete and accurate records related to dialysis communication for one of one resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident 326). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Hemodialysis Access Care, last reviewed September 2024, read, in part, Do not use the access site arm to take blood pressure. Review of Resident 326's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease - failure of kidney function to remove toxins from blood), hypertension (elevated/high blood pressure), and diabetes mellitus (a form of diabetes that is characterized by high blood sugar, insulin resistance, and relative lack of insulin). Review of Resident 326's care plan revealed a focus area of Resident needs dialysis with an intervention for do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide or obtain dental services to meet the needs of each resident for one of one residents reviewed for dental concerns (Resident 80). Findings include: Review of Resident 80's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF - weakness of the heart that leads to buildup of fluid in the lungs and surrounding body tissues) and vitamin deficiency. During an interview with Resident 80 on November 18, 2024, at 10:17 AM, she revealed that she was concerned that the facility did not do routine dental care. She also revealed that she has her own teeth and is used to taking good care of them. Review of dental consult form dated December 1, 2023, revealed that recommended treatment included dental prophy (prophylaxis - dental cleaning and checkup) in six months. Further review of Resident 80's clinical record failed to reveal evidence that any additional dental services were received since her visit on December 1, 2023. During an interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services are provided in accordance with professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for two of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 3 and 10). Findings include: Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnosis to include heart failure (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged home on March 16, 2024. Review of Resident 3's physician orders revealed an order for bath/shower twice weekly every Tuesday/Friday 7:00 AM-3:00 PM shift, with an active date of March 6, 2024. Review of Resident 3's March 2024 Treatment Administration Record revealed the resident received a shower on March 12, 2024. Review of the facility's policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable home-like environment for three of 34 resident's reviewed (Resident 2, 18, and 34). Findings include: Observation in Resident 2's room on January 22, 2024, at 9:43 AM, revealed the wall behind her bed was damaged. Additional observation in Resident 2's room on January 23, 2024, at 9:00 AM, revealed the wall behind her bed was damaged. Observation in Resident 18's room on January 22, 2024, at 9:26 AM, revealed her floor was dirty surrounding her bed and behind her bed, and a table across from her bed had a dusty shelf underneath. Additional observation in Resident 18's room on January 23, 2024, at 8:56 AM, revealed her floor was dirty surrounding her bed and behind her bed, and a table across from her bed had a dusty shelf underneath. Observation in Resident 34's room on January 22, 2024, at 9:43 AM, revealed her floor was dirty surrounding her bed and behind her bed, and her privacy curtain was soiled with a brown substance. Additional observation in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents access to grievance forms within reach for residents who are wheelchair-bound for one of two areas identified (Roosevelt Hall); and failed to post the required information of the Grievance Official for two of two areas identified (Jefferson Hall and Roosevelt Hall). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Grievances/Complaints, Filing, last reviewed August 16, 2023, revealed section titled, Policy Interpretation and Implementation stated, .The Administrator has delegated the responsibility of grievance and/or complaint investigation to the Grievance Officer who is (blank) and can be contacted by (blank). Observations of all resident areas conducted on January 22, 23, and 24, 2024, revealed the facility failed to post written information that identified the facility's Grievance Official, the Grievance Official's business mailing and email address, and phone number. Observations of the nursing station on Roosevelt Hall on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — patternNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, employee record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to perform criminal background checks prior to or upon hire for three of five employees reviewed (Employee 6, 7, and 8). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Background Screening Investigations, last reviewed August 16, 2023, revealed section 1 stated, The Personnel/Human Resources Director, or other designee, will conducted background checks, reference checks and criminal conviction checks [sic] on all potential employees and contract personnel who meet the criteria for direct access employee [sic]. Such investigations will be initiated within two days of an offer of employment or contract agreement. Review of Employee 6's personnel record revealed that Employee 6 was hired by the facility on October 3, 2023, for the position of Nurse Aide. Continued review of Employee 6's personnel record revealed no Pennsylvania criminal conviction check. On January 25, 2024, the facility submitted a Pennsylvania criminal conviction check for Employee 6 that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment was accurate for five of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 18, 22, 37, 76, and 125). Findings include: Review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of lung disease that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), Alzheimer's Disease (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), and acute cough. Review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed a physician note dated September 22, 2023, that stated, Resident seen and examined today for a monthly follow up and review of chronic medical conditions including but not limited to COPD .COPD stable at this time .Treat exacerbations with scheduled duonebs (breathing treatments), prednisone burst and antibiotics if indicated. Review of Resident 18's Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for four of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 18, 74, 99, and 100) Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, last reviewed on August 16, 2023, revealed that assessments of resident are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a group of lung disease that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), Alzheimer's Disease (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), and acute cough. Observation in Resident 18's room on January 22, 2024, at 9:27 AM, revealed a nebulizer machine (a medical device that delivers liquid medicine into the lungs for people with certain lung disorders)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, staff interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a pressure ulcer received care consistent with professional standards of practice for two of two Residents reviewed (Residents 45 and 80). Findings include: Review of Resident 45's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypokalemia (low potassium) and atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow). Review of a [NAME] Wound Evaluation and Management Summary completed on June 15, 2023, revealed Resident 45 had a post-surgical back wound measuring 4.0 x 0.5 x 1.0 centimeters (length x width x depth), with a treatment plan for Santyl to be applied once daily for 30 days, mupirocin ointment to be applied once daily for 30 days, alginate calcium to be applied once daily for 30 days, and gauze island with boarder to be applied once daily for 30 days. Review of Resident 45's June 2023 TAR (treatment administration record) revealed Resident 45 did not receive wound care as ordered for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide oversight and monitoring of parameters of nutritional status and implementation of nutrition interventions for three of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 37, 76, and 80). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Fortified Foods, not dated, read, in part, the purpose of utilizing fortified foods is to add additional calories/protein to the diet in efforts to address weight loss, skin status, or nutritional concerns. Fortified foods to be added to the resident diet includes super cereal and super potatoes. These items should be prepared using the recipes within the policy. When fortified foods are provided, intake percentages need to be monitored closely to assure positive outcomes. Review of Resident 37's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review observations, policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory services for three of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 18, 37, and 328). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Administering Medications Through a Small Volume Nebulizer, revised October 2010, read, in part, when equipment is completely dry store in a plastic bag with the Resident's name and date on it, change equipment and tubing every seven days. Review of facility provided policy, titled Oxygen Administration, Revised October 2010, revealed that, to prepare for oxygen administration, employees should verify that there is a physician's order for the procedure and review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. The same policy failed to reveal whether oxygen tubing should be labeled. Review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a group of lung disease that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the licensed pharmacist's report of a medication irregularity was reviewed and acted upon for five of 26 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 4, 22, 63, 76, and 81). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Regimen Reviews, revised April 2007, read, in part, the Consultant Pharmacist will document his/her finding and recommendations on the monthly drug/medication regimen review report. The Consultant Pharmacist will provide a written report to physicians for each resident with an identified irregularity . If the physician doesn't provide a pertinent response, or the Consultant Pharmacist identified that no action has been taken, he/she will then contact the Medical Director or the Administrator. The Consultant Pharmacist will provide the Director of Nursing (DON) and Medical Director with a written signed and dated copy of the report listing the irregularities found and recommendations for their solutions.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one of four residents reviewed were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications (Resident 42). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, revised December 2016, read, in part, the attending physician will evaluate and document with input from other disciplines and consults as needed. Nursing staff will monitor for and report any side effects to the attending physician. Review of Resident 42's clinical record contained diagnoses that included dementia (a condition characterized by progressive loss of intellectual functioning, impairment of memory and abstract thinking), history of alcohol abuse, anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), depression (feelings of severe despondency and dejection), and bipolar (a mental health condition alternating periods of elation and depression). Review of Resident 42's physician orders included: Wellbutrin 300 milligrams (mg) once daily for depression, started June 28, 2023;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — patternProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, policy review, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine and emergency dental services for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 22). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Dental Services, with a review date of August 16, 2023, revealed a policy statement of routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. Review of Resident 22's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included type two diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine) and hypertensive chronic kidney disease (high blood pressure caused by damage to the kidneys) with stage five chronic kidney disease (kidneys are close to or have already failed). During an interview with Resident 22 on January 22, 2024, at 1:15 PM, an observation was made of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food/beverages in accordance with professional standards for food safety for two of three pantry refrigerators ([NAME] and Phoenix pantries). Findings include: Observation in the [NAME] unit pantry on January 22, 2024, at 9:36 AM, with Employee 12 (Food Service Director) revealed one container on high calorie liquid nutritional supplement was opened with contents partially removed and was not date marked with an open or use by date. During an interview with Employee 12 on January 22, 2024, at 9:36 AM, it was revealed that she checks the pantries daily and if anything is not date marked with an open date, it is disposed of. Observation in the Phoenix refrigerator on January 22, 2024, at 10:03 AM, there was one 45 ounce applesauce that was opened with contents partially removed and not date marked with an open or use by date. During an interview with Employee 9 (Unit Manager) on January 24, 2024, at 1:53 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility document review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to hold Quality Assurance Committee meetings at least quarterly for two of four quarters reviewed (First Quarter of 2023 and Second Quarter of 2023). Findings include: Review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI), for 2023-2024, revealed it stated, QAPI Committee meetings will be conducted monthly .QAPI Leadership will assure that minimal committee membership is met and will periodically monitor that resources are available to support QAPI activities .A quarterly QAPI activities summary will be reviewed and approved by the QAPI Committee. Quarterly updates will be communicated to organizational leadership, staff, residents and families. Review of all available documentation submitted by the facility revealed no evidence that the facility conducted a Quality Assurance Committee meeting during the first quarter (January, February, March) and the second quarter (April, May, June) of 2023. During a staff interview on January 25, 2024, at approximately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure implementation of an effective infection control program and ensure staff implemented infection control policies to prevent the spread of infection by wearing required PPE (personal protective equipment) and hanging correct signage for one of two residents observed (Resident 326). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Monitoring Compliance with Infection Control, last revised September 2017, revealed The infection preventionist or designee shall monitor the effectiveness of our infection prevention and control work practices and protective equipment. This includes but is not necessarily limited to .effective implementation of hand hygiene practices by all departments to prevent the spread of infections .effective use of disposable gloves and other personal protective equipment to prevent spread of infection. Review of facility policy, titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, last revised December 2012, revealed hand hygiene should be performed before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents have the right to a dignified existence for two of 34 resident's reviewed (Resident 2 and 80). Findings include: Observation on January 22, 2024, at 12:11 PM, the surveyor overheard Employee 2 (Housekeeper) say to Employee 3 (Licensed Practical Nurse), If the door is open, I am not going to knock. Observation of Employee 2 on January 22, 2024, at 12:13 PM, the surveyor observed her entering Resident 2 and 80's room without knocking or notifying of entry. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on January 23, 2024, at 1:43 PM, she revealed she would expect employees to knock prior to entering Residents' rooms. 28 Pa Code 201.29(d) Resident Rights
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident needs were accommodated regarding call bell accessibility for two of 34 residents reviewed (Residents 18 and 34). Findings include: Review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 18's care plan revealed a focus area: The resident is at moderate risk for falls related to confusion, gait/balance problems related to non-weight bearing right leg, last revised March 10, 2023, with an intervention for be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs prompt response to all requests for assistance, last revised March 10, 2023. Observation in Resident 18's room on January 22, 2023, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for three of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 26, 37, and 51). Findings include: Review of Resident 26's clinical record on January 23, 2024, at approximately 10:00 AM, revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated/high blood pressure) and congestive heart failure (CHF - decreased ability of the heart to pump blood throughout the body, resulting in excess fluid buildup throughout the body). Review of Resident 26's clinical record revealed Resident 26 had a Foley catheter (tube placed in the urinary bladder through the urethra to facilitate draining of urine into an external collection bag). Review of Resident 26's comprehensive plan of care on January 24, 2024, at approximately 12:30 PM, revealed that Resident 26 did not have a care plan that addressed the use of a Foley catheter. During a staff interview on January 25, 2024, at approximately 12:00 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services regarding facial shaving for two of thirty-two residents reviewed (Resident 41 and 122). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, without revision date, revealed, Residents who ae unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL's) independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Review of Resident 41's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included diabetes (a chronic disease that occurs either when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin or when the body cannot effectively use the insulin it produces) and lack of coordination (Uncoordinated movement is due to a muscle control problem that causes an inability to coordinate movements). Observation of Resident 41 on January 22, 2024, at 11:17 AM, revealed that she had long and thick facial hair. Observation of Resident 41 on January 23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident receives proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 37). Findings include: Review of Resident 37's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine), anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), age related macular degeneration (a degenerative condition affecting the central part of the retina, resulting in distortion or loss of central vision), glaucoma (a condition of increased pressure within the eyeball causing general loss of sight), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and heart failure (the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). During an interview with Resident 37 on January 22, 2024, at 12:58…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide restorative nursing care for range of motion exercises for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 100). Findings include: Review of Resident 100's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included essential hypertension (high blood pressure) and bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). Review of a fall incident report completed on Resident 100 on December 7, 2023, revealed an intervention for Resident 100 to be screened by therapy post-fall. Review of a Physical Therapy evaluation and plan of treatment completed on Resident 100 on December 8, 2023, under the assessment summary, revealed recommendations that Resident 100 would benefit from a restorative nursing program with nursing staff for ambulation with rolling walker to maintain functional mobility. Review of a Rehabilitation Service Restorative Nursing/Functional Maintenance Referral completed on Resident 100 on January 5, 2024, revealed a range…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents receive appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 327). Findings include: Review of facility provided policy, titled Catheter Care, Urinary, revised September 2014, revealed, Be sure to catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Review of Resident 327's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder, or urethra) and malignant neoplasm of cervix (malignant tumor of the cervix, the lowermost part of the uterus). Observation of Resident 327 on January 22, 2024, at 9:50 AM, revealed the Resident lying in bed and their catheter was lying on the floor. Observation of Resident 327 on January 22, 2024, at 11:26 AM, revealed the Resident lying in bed and their catheter was lying on the floor. Observation of Resident 327…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, manufacturer information, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adherence to medication expiration dates (use by dates) and failed to ensure appropriate labeling of medication when opened for one of one medication storage rooms observed ([NAME] Hall). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Storage of Medications, last revised August 16, 2023, stated discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. Observation of the [NAME] Hall medication storage room refrigerator on January 23, 2024, at 10:33 AM, revealed one box of Tuberculin purified protein (Tubersol) (substance that's used to detect exposure to tuberculosis) containing a multi-use vial that was open and partially used. No open date was documented on the box or vial. Further, observation revealed a second box of Tuberculin purified protein (Tubersol) containing a multi-use vial that was open and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adaptive feeding devices for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 37). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Adaptive Self-Feeding Devices, not dated, read, in part, dietary department will be responsible for placing the devices on resident's tray as needed. Review of Resident 37's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine), anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), age related macular degeneration (a degenerative condition affecting the central part of the retina and resulting in distortion or loss of central vision), glaucoma (a condition of increased pressure within the eyeball causing general loss of sight), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), chronic ulcer of left foot (open area), osteoarthritis (degeneration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility provided information, clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that, in preparation for room changes, each resident received written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room was changed for one of one residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Transfer or Discharge Notice, with a revised date of December 2016, revealed the following: 2. Under the following circumstances, the notice will be given as soon as it is practicable but before the transfer or discharge .; 2f. An immediate transfer or discharge is required by the resident's urgent medical needs .; 3. The resident and/or representative will be notified in writing of the of the following information: a) the reason for the transfer or discharge, b) the effective date of the transfer or discharge, c) the location to which the resident is being transferred or discharged ; and 10. At time of notification, the facility will provide each resident and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, facility documentation review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident is free from mental abuse for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Abuse Prevention Program, with a last revised date of December 2016, revealed, in part: As part of the resident abuse prevention, the administration will: 1) Protect our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies, family members, legal representatives, friends, visitors, or any other individual; and 5. Implement measures to address factors that may lead to abusive situations, for example: a. Provide staff with opportunities to express challenges related to their job and work environment without reprimand or retaliation; and b. Instruct staff regarding appropriate ways to address interpersonal conflicts. Mental abuse is defined as the use of verbal or nonverbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility policy review, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature for one of one meal observed on the [NAME] Hallway. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Food Temperatures revealed, The point of service temperature to residents will be within the range of 120-140 degrees based on the resident's preference. During an interview with Resident 5 on August 24, 2023, at 10:42 AM, they revealed that they didn't consider the food to be appetizing. During an interview with Resident 2 on August 24, 2023, at 11:39 AM, they stated that the food is always cold. During an interview with Resident 6 on August 24, 2023, at 12:45 PM, they stated that they do not like the food. During an interview with Resident 7 on August 24, 2023, at 1:05 PM, they stated that the food is always cold. During an interview Resident 8 on August 24, 2023, at 1:30 PM, they stated that their lunch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$61,932 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $44,777 — penalty dated 2024-10-30
- $8,167 — penalty dated 2024-04-08
- $8,988 — penalty dated 2024-04-08
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MORDECHAI WEISZ — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| POPULAR BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | since 12/01/2021 |
| AHMAD, AYESHA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2021 |
| SMITH, ROBERT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2023 |
| WEISZ, MORDECHAI | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/07/2024 |
| LIONS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/07/2024 |
| 1020 N UNION STREET LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395347. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.