Stillwater Health Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 63 beds and averages 58.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.88 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.31 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.27 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide interventions outlined in the resident's care plan to ensure that two-person assist was provided during activities of daily living (ADL) for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #12 [R12]), reviewed for falls. The failure to have supervision (two-person assist) as directed by the care plan resulted in an avoidable accident; R12 falling out of bed during evening ADL care, requiring transfer to the emergency room [ER] with admission to the hospital, sustaining a laceration to the head, and rib fractures with increased pain. In addition, based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to adequately supervise a fall risk resident for 1 of 2 sampled residents (R30), reviewed for falls. Findings: R12 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease with history of right above-the knee amputation, most recently a left toe amputation, and history of deep vein thrombosis on Coumadin (a blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-08-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, review of the facility reportable incident form, and review of the medical record, the facility failed remove a bed pan timely from 1 of residents reviewed. This resulted in harm when a resident was left on a bed pan for approximately 45 minutes and sustained a Stage 2 pressure ulcer (Resident 1). Finding: A Nursing Facility Reportable Incident form was faxed to Division of Licensing and Certification office indicating on 7/25/23 at approximately 4:00 a.m., a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) placed a resident on a bed pan, left resident on bedpan and failed to monitor the resident per policy. At approximately 4:45 a.m., when resident asked to be taken off the bedpan while removing the bed pan, the resident had 2 open areas on left buttock creating a Stage II injury. A review of Resident #1's medical record stated, in a nursing note, on 7/25/23, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 at approximately 4:00 a.m., placed a bed pan under [Resident #1] for toileting. At approximately 4:45 a.m. CNA #2 answered Resident #1's call bell. Upon removing the bedpan, skin came off…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the available for use supply, for 2 of 3 Medication Storage Areas reviewed (A Wing Treatment Cart and B Wing Treatment Cart).Findings:On 2/25/26 at 3:16 p.m., a surveyor and the Director of Nursing Services (DON) observed and confirmed the following were in the A Wing treatment cart and available for use:-1 box of 12 rectal Acetaminophen Suppositories 650 milligrams (mg) with an expiration date of 01/2026-1 multi-use vial containing 10 milliliter (ml) of Insulin glargine 100 units (u)/10ml, open but unlabeled with an open date or an expiration date. The DON stated insulin is good for 28 days after opening, and was unable to determine when the vial would expire.-2 open vials, 10mL insulin lispro 100u/ml, with an open date of 1/14/26. The insulin expired on 2/11/26 and was available for use 14 days past expiration.On 2/25/26 at 3:35 p.m., a surveyor and the DON observed and confirmed the following were in the B Wing treatment cart and available for use:-1 open vial, 10mL insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean manner on 2 of 3 days of survey (2/24/26 and 2/25/26), the facility failed to ensure that dented cans were removed from use and the facility failed to discard expired products in the reach-in refrigerator and the walk in refrigerator located in the kitchen that were available for use on 1 of 3 days of survey (2/24/26), Findings: On 2/24/26 at 10:45 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen a surveyor observed a built-in air conditioner that was heavily covered in dirt and grime, also observed were dust webs from the top corners right and left of the air conditioner to the ceiling. In the dry food storage room on the shelves and in the can rack the surveyor and Food Service Director observed the following dented cans2 cans of crushed pineapples in juice, 6 pounds, 12-ounce cans that were dented near the bottom seal. 4 cans of mushrooms, pieces and stems 3-pound, 14-ounce cans that were dented near the bottom and top seals. In the reach-in refrigerator there was a carton of half…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical record(s) contained complete and accurate information for 6 of 10 sampled residents reviewed on survey (Resident #7 [R7], R8, R51, R2, R36, and R17).Findings: 1. On 2/25/26, R7's clinical record was reviewed. R7's Order Summary indicated, Check monthly weights every day shift every 1 month(s) starting on the 1st for 7 day(s) for Monitoring with a start date of 8/1/25, Check monthly vital signs every day shift every 1 month(s) starting on the 1st for 7 day(s) for Monitoring with a start date of 8/1/25, and Weekly [blood pressure (B/P)] and [heart rate (HR)] checks. every day shift every [Sunday] for [Monitoring] B/P meds with a start date of 8/17/25. The Treatment Administration Record [TAR] indicated R7's vital signs (weight, blood pressure, temperature, pulse, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation rate) were identical on 2/1/26, 2/2/26, 2/3/26, 2/4/26, 2/5/26, 2/6/26 and 2/7/26, 7 days. 2. On 2/25/26, R8's clinical record was reviewed. R8's Order Summary Report indicated an order, start dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse and neglect was investigated for 1 of 4 complaints reviewed.Findings:A review of the facility's policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program effective: 6/2016, revised 03/2025 states, 8. Identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property.A review of a facility-provided written statement that the Director of Nursing (DON) received from a staff member dated 9/25/25 states, .a handful of residents are scared. and . has neglected some residents care., referring to another staff member.A review of a facility-provided written statement that the DON received, not signed, or dated states, resident looked so scared.(he's/she's) so rough and mean to me, referring to another staff member.On 2/25/26 at 4:47 p. m. in an interview with the DON, a surveyor confirmed that during the facility's recertification survey and this investigation, the facility was not able to provide evidence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a physician ordered medication was available for use to meet the needs for 1 of 4 residents observed during medication administration pass (Resident #64 [R64]).Finding:On 2/26/26 at 7:56 a.m., a surveyor observed Registered Nurse #1 (RN1) complete a medication administration pass for R64. RN1 stated she could not administer Testosterone Gel (a medication used to treat low testosterone levels not due to normal aging) to R64 because the facility did not have any.On 2/26/26, R64's clinical record review indicated an order, dated 2/20/26, for Testosterone Transdermal Gel 20.25 [milligram (MG)] per (/) Actuation (ACT)] (1.62%) (Testosterone) Apply 1 pump [applied to the skin (transdermally)] one time a day for [HYPOGONADISM (a condition in which the body doesn't make enough of the hormone testosterone)] APPLY TO UPPER ARM. Review of the Medication Administration Record indicated that R64's Testosterone Gel was not available and R64 had not received Testosterone Gel as physician ordered, from 2/20/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility Infection Control Program (ICP) and interview, the facility failed to complete an annual review of the ICP and update/revise the program if needed for 1 of 1 ICP.Finding: On 2/25/26 at 9:00 a.m., in an interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP), she stated she did not know if the ICP had been annually reviewed. A review of the ICP was completed and there was no evidence that an annual review of the ICP had been completed.On 2/25/26 at 9:53 a.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the Administrator, confirmed that the facility has not completed an annual review of the ICP.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on employee record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program which includes, at a minimum, training on dementia management by failing to ensure that 1 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) staff employed completed their required training (CNA3).Finding:On 2/26/26 the following employee record was reviewed:CNA3 was hired on 7/3/23. There was no documented training on dementia in over 12 months.On 2/26/26 at 8:00 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Administrator stated that she was unable to find any documented trainings listed above, and a surveyor confirmed that CNA3 lacked evidence that mandatory training on dementia was completed within the past 12 months.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable air temperature for 3 of 4 days of survey. Findings: On 1/13/25, during an initial tour of A-Wing and B-Wing, the air temperature was observed to be chilly. On 1/13/25, between 11:15 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., in an interview with the surveyor, Resident #5 (R5), R10, R11, R17 and R36 stated they feel cold and at night, it is colder. On 1/14/25, the facility air temperature was observed to be chilly on A-Wing. On 1/15/25 at 12:30 p.m., the air temperature was observed to be chilly on A-Wing. The thermostats on A and B-Wing and in the main dining room were observed to be set at 70 degrees Fahrenheit (F). On 1/15/25 at 1:00 p.m., the air temperature was taken in front of the nurse's station on A-Wing and registered at 69.9 Degrees F; in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] the air temperature was 70.1 degrees F, in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] the air temperature was 70.1 degrees F, and in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] the air temperature was 70.1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of the facility's 'Fall Policy and Procedure' and interview, the facility failed to re-evaluate fall interventions and the relevance of the current fall interventions for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #30 [R30]) reviewed for 7 falls within 8 months timeframe. Finding: On 1/15/25, a review of R30's clinical record was completed. R30 is diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease/Dementia. Nurse's notes indicated that from 6/3/24 through 1/3/25, R30 has had several unwitnessed falls, mostly in the late afternoon and evening time, in his/her bedroom. On 6/12/24 at 12:23 p.m., R30 was found on their bedroom floor and had sustained a fracture of the right femur. On 8/19/24, R30 found in bedroom and apparently had slid from their wheelchair onto their bedroom floor. On 9/14/24, R30 fell to the bedroom floor. When found, R30 told staff they were reaching for the TV remote. On 10/25/24, R30 found on floor next to the bed. On 11/13/24, R30 found on bedroom floor, slid to the floor from his/her bed while staff in room. On 12/11/24, R30 found on bedroom floor after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain oxygen filled tanks while in use, failed to maintain a physician ordered oxygen setting on an air concentrator, and failed to maintain respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to respiratory care for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #10 [R10], R15 and R1). Findings: 1. On 1/13/25 at 12:10 p.m., the surveyor observed Resident #10 (R10) in his/her wheelchair that held a portable oxygen tank on the back of the wheelchair. R10 was using a nasal cannula to receive the extra oxygen. Upon observation of the oxygen tank, it registered empty. After the observation, the surveyor reviewed R10's clinical record under the physician order section. R10 had a physician order for continuous oxygen to be kept at a range between 2-5 liters per minute (LPM) to maintain an oxygen saturation of 90%. At 12:25 p.m., RN1 was observed changing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,190 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-01-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FIRST ATLANTIC HEALTHCARE — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $238K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME