Seal Rock Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 157 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 111 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 90.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.48 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.96 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.61 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2025-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify and implement isolation/contact precautions for residents who were exhibiting symptoms of gastroenteritis and failed to follow the Nurse Practitioner's recommendation to ensure that Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplies were available for use for these residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure all staff were knowledgeable about which residents were experiencing these symptoms and ensure PPE were used while providing care. This resulted in the spread of gastroenteritis [nflammation that spreads from your stomach into your intestines, causing pain, vomiting and diarrhea symptoms] (GI) symptoms creating an immediate jeopardy situation to 17 out of 90 residents', on 6 of 7 units: Eagle Island, Ram Island, Bluff Island, [NAME] Islan, Beach Island and Gooseberry Island. (Resident #27 #26, #25, #22, #9, #10, #13, #14, #16, #34, #4, #32, #6, #5, #7, #33, and #3) Findings: 1. On 3/17/25 the Division of Licensing and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative was provided with written information, concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an advanced directive, or appoint a surrogate, was completed for 10 of 23 residents reviewed for advance directives (Resident #1, #6, #8, #17, #36, #50, #89, #103, #107, and #110). 1.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in January of 2026. A review of the resident's electronic medical record and their paper medical record lacked evidence that the facility offered, reviewed, or provided written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive to the resident and/or resident representative. 2. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in May of 2015. A review of the resident's electronic medical record and their paper medical record lacked evidence that the facility offered, reviewed, or provided written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive to the resident and/or resident representative. 3.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident remained free of misappropriation of property in the form of theft of a resident's personal credit card and multiple unauthorized purchases for 1 of 27 residents screened for abuse and misappropriation in the initial pool.Findings: On 3/30/26 at 10:30 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, Resident #89 stated, I had someone take my credit card and my social security card on Christmas Eve (2025). She (Certified Nursing Assistant - CNA) also took the debit card of the resident across the hall, and someone downstairs, and another lost a necklace, $900 something on her card. I was lucky, she (CNA) got a lot out of the lady across the hall. Resident #89 stated there were all kinds of charges, (to a) motel, gas station, Target, etc. They (the stores) all had cameras and they caught them. Resident #89 stated he/she reported the charges on his/her credit card to the facility and staff acted on it immediately. Resident #89 stated I called the (credit card) company and they took the charges off. The CNA was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and a review of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards relating to a patient lift on 1 of 1 unit and the storage of chemicals being properly secured for 1 of 1 observation for 1 of 4 days of survey. (3/30/26 through 4/2/26)Findings:1. On 3/30/26 at 10:10 a.m., 2 surveyors observed an EZ Sit to Stand Lift missing both of its safety pins available for use outside of room [ROOM NUMBER].On 3/30/26 at 10:14 a.m., in an interview with Registered Nurse #1, who confirms that the sit to stand lift is missing it's safety pins. At this time, she removes the lift from the unit.On 3/30/26 at 2:08 p.m., in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), the above information was confirmed. At this time, she states maintenance has taken the machine off the floor and ordered new pins that should be here in a few days. 2. On 3/31/26 at 8:26 a.m., observation of an unsecured container of CaviWipes on the medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) employee education record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the CNA attended the mandatory yearly Abuse and Neglect along with Resident Rights training for 1 of 6 CNA's reviewed. Furthermore, the facility failed to monitor and ensure that the CNA attended the required 12 hours of annual in-service education training for 1 of 6 randomly selected CNAs employed greater than 1 year. (CNA #1)Findings:CNA #1 was hired in June of 2023. Review of CNA #1 Employee In-service/attendance records lacked evidence of Resident Rights training and Abuse and Neglect training for 2025. Furthermore, the record lacked evidence of the required 12 hours for continuing education for the year 2025.On 4/2/26 at 1:30 p.m., in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) who confirmed CNA #1 did not have 12 hours of education, Abuse and Neglect training, and Resident Rights training. She then add that CNA#1 is a per-diem employee and is unsure how many hours she worked in 2025.On 4/2/26 at 4:00 p.m., in an interview with the Senior Healthcare…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff immediately initiated isolation/contact precautions for residents who were exhibiting symptoms of gastroenteritis (GI) (i.e. diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and/or fever) and ensure that Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplies were available for use for these residents. This has resulted in the spread of GI symptoms throughout the facility which began on 3/24/25 and Norovirus being confirmed on 4/2/25. Findings: 1. On 4/2/25 at 8:45 a.m., upon entry to the facility, 2 surveyors observed no posting or signage on the door of any infections/symptoms occurring in the building. In an interview, the Administrator stated there is something GI going around, a few residents have had it and believed there is one resident who was having symptoms. She then stated that both the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionists (ADON/IP) were out sick with nausea, vomiting and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record review the Administration failed to follow the facility's Infection - Clinical Protocol policy and procedures by not following the Family Nurse Practitioner's (FNP) recommendation of isolation/contact precautions for residents who were exhibiting symptoms of gastroenteritis (GI) (i.e. diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and/or fever) and ensure that Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplies were available for use for these residents. In addition, Administration failed to ensure the infection Preventionist was following the facilities Infection prevention and Control Program which included oversight, outbreak management, prevention of infection and monitoring employee health and safety. This has resulted in the spread of GI symptoms throughout the facility. The administration was notified of the potential outbreak on 3/26/25 and Norovirus being confirmed on 4/2/25 Finding: On 4/2/25 at 8:45 a.m., upon entry to the facility, 2 surveyors observed no posting or signage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident's Power of Attorney (POA) was notified of a significant change in medical condition for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) (Resident #29). Findings: On 3/17/25 Division of Licensing received a complaint that Resident #29, was transported to the hospital on 3/15/25 due to mental status changes. The hospital notified the POA that, according to the facility records, Resident #29 had tested positive for RSV on 3/7/25. The POA was not made aware of this diagnosis. On 4/2/25, a review of Resident #29's medical record lacked evidence of nursing documentation and/or labs to verify that he/she was tested or positive for RSV. At 3:25 p.m., during an interview with the Advance Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) she confirmed that Resident #29 was seen by the provider and swabbed for RSV on 3/7/25, which resulted in him/her testing positive for RSV. The APRN was able to obtain the positive lab results through the lab documentation. The medical record lacked evidence of his/her POA being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was followed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for diabetes management. (Resident #29) Findings: On 4/2/25 a surveyor reviewed Resident #29 clinical record which showed an active physician order initiated on 11/5/24 for blood glucose monitoring one time a day every Tuesday and to call the provider if blood sugars are less than 100 or above 200. Further review shows the blood sugar levels on 3/4/25 was 285, on 3/11/25 was 311, on 3/25/25 was 298, and on 4/1/25 was 253. The clinical record lacked evidence of physician notification for the above levels. On 4/2/25 at 4:38 p.m. and at 5:50 p.m., during an interview, the Family Nurse Practitioner stated that she was aware of Resident #29 blood sugar being elevated on 4/1/25. However, she was unable to recall if she was made aware of any other elevated glucose levels for Resident #29. On 4/2/25 at 4:38 p.m., during an interview, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 stated, when he gets a high blood sugar reading, he will either call the provider, if the provider was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's Bowel Maintenance Program was followed, and the staff did not notify the physician of resident's condition for 1 of 8 sampled residents (#1). Finding: Review of Resident #1's clinical record indicated on Physician's Notes from 6/5/2023 to 7/24/2023 list diagnosis of Chronic Diarrhea and Constipation. Resident #1's Stool Output record demonstrated that the resident had no documented bowel movement (BM) for a period of 5 days (7/10/2023, 7/11/2023, 7/12/2023, 7/13/2023, and 7/14/2023. Medical record indicates resident was hospitalization on 7/24/2023. The Medication admission Record (MAR) demonstrated that the resident continued to receive Imodium 2mg (milligrams) twice daily until the resident was hospitalized on [DATE]. The Bowel Maintenance Program states: If no bowel movement for 3 days, follow physicians orders for bowel management. Constipation: No BM times 3 days check for impaction. If impacted, notify MD, if not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in good repair and in a sanitary condition on 2 of 7 units, for 1 of 1 Environmental Tours. (Bluff Island and [NAME] Island). Findings: On 7/27/22 at 9:28 a.m., an environmental tour was conducted with the Administrator in which the following findings were observed: Bluff Island: room [ROOM NUMBER]A - the wall beside the recliner was gouged and had chipped/missing paint with exposed sheetrock. room [ROOM NUMBER]A and B - the wall behind both recliners were large areas of gouged wall with chipped/missing paint exposing sheetrock. room [ROOM NUMBER]B- the bed foot board had gouged and peeling laminate exposing rough wood. [NAME] Island: room [ROOM NUMBER]- the bathroom door frame was deeply marred exposing rough wood causing sharp and uncleanable surface, The above concerns were confirmed with the Administrator at the time of observations. On 7/26/22, at 8:20…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$75,433 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $75,433 — penalty dated 2025-04-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FIRST ATLANTIC HEALTHCARE — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $417K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME