Seaside Healthcare LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 139 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 144 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 147 beds and averages 129.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.05 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.50 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility's incident report, internal investigation, clinical record, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident had a choice about his/her care in the area of bathing for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (R1).Findings: On 3/4/26, the Division of Licensing and Certification received an on-line report concerning a resident being made to take a shower despite having refused and requesting a bed bath instead. On 3/16/26, a review of the facility's internal investigation noted on 2/27/26, R1 had an episode of incontinence. Staff were reported to have asked if R1 wanted to shower at which time he/she declined. R1 requested to speak to the unit manager. However, the unit manager was involved in a clinical meeting. The charge nurse was reported to have interrupted the meeting and asked if there was any reason R1 could not have a shower, to which the leadership team responded no, there were no contraindications they were aware of. The charge nurse informed the resident that management was ok with R1 having a shower. A CNA (certified nursing assistant) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-18 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records contained information regarding the transfer or discharge of a resident to a hospital, and failed to provide transfer, discharge and bed hold information to the resident, or designated representative, for 3 of 9 residents reviewed for hospitalization (R1, R6, R11).Findings:1.On 9/30/25 at 9:35 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, Resident #6 (R6) stated he/she had been sent to the hospital since initial admission but was unable to remember why and did not remember if he/she had received transfer, discharge or bed hold notices at the time of transfer.On 11/17/25, a review of R6's medical record noted an admission date of 8/29/25. R6 was discharged home on 9/30/25. The provider's Discharge summary, dated [DATE], stated Had Emergency Department visit on 9/27/25 at his/her request due to vomiting. The surveyor was unable to locate evidence of nursing progress notes, assessments, or transfer, discharge and bed hold notices having…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed and implemented in the areas of accident hazards, unnecessary medications, and urinary tract infection, for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for care planning (R11, R29, R39). Findings: 1. On 9/29/25 at 11:43 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, R11 stated he/she goes outside to smoke 2-3 times daily.A review of R11's clinical record noted an admission date of 8/22/25. A Smoking Assessment completed on 8/22/25 indicated R11 demonstrated balance problems while sitting or standing, unable to hold tobacco products safely, unable to extinguish tobacco safely, does not follow facility's policy on location and time of smoking. On 9/26/25, staff completed a Late entry for 9/21/25-Smoking and Safety, which stated Smoking status: Resident uses tobacco products. Resident has balance problems while sitting or standing. Resident follows the facility's policy on location and time of smoking. Smoking safety note: wheelchair baseline for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents were served a meal in a homelike setting and treated with dignity and respect during a meal service observation on 1 of 6 units (400 unit).Findings: On 10/1/25 at 8:15 a.m., two surveyors observed the breakfast meal service in the common dining area on Unit 400. All residents received their meals on a serving tray placed on the table in front of them, with no dishes being removed. In addition, surveyors observed CNA1 (Certified Nursing Assistant) standing over a resident feeding them. A surveyor asked CNA1 if the residents always have the dishes left on the trays and CNA1 stated, Yes. When a surveyor asked CNA1 if this was the residents' choice, CNA1 stated, I never asked them. A surveyor brought this to the attention of the Nurse Manager for Unit 300, who confirmed the findings.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for 1 of 10 sampled residents reviewed for new admissions (#27). Findings: On 9/29/25 at 3:29 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, R27's family member stated an interdisciplinary meeting was held on 9/15/25, but they had not been invited. A copy of the care plan was provided on 9/19/25. The family member stated there had never been a formal meeting with the family and the whole team. A review of the clinical record for Resident #27 (R27) revealed an admission date of 9/10/25 with diagnoses including acute cystitis and fall. R27's base line care plan was not initiated until 9/15/25. A revision was completed on 9/29/25. A copy of the care plan conference from 9/29/25 indicated the family was invited but did not attend. On 11/18/25 at 1:20 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Director of Nursing confirmed the baseline care plan had not been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure that physicians' orders were obtained for treatment of an existing wound for 1 of 1 resident who was admitted on [DATE] resulting in a delay of treatment for the wound (R165).Findings: 1. On 11/18/25 at 1:34 p.m. the surveyor reviewed R165's medical records that contained a pre-admit nurse to nurse note dated 2/13/25 that states the resident has a stage II coccyx wound that occurred at home.On 11/18/25 at 2:16 p.m. the surveyor reviewed R#165's medical record that contained a consult from the hospital with a date range of 2/2/25 to 2/3/25 that states, skin concerns; noted small 0.3 cm (centimeter) open area over gluteal cleft. On 11/18/25 at 1:45 p.m. the surveyor reviewed orders for wound treatment dated 2/27/25, written 14 days after admission to the facility.On 11/18/25 at 1:45 p.m. the surveyor interviewed the Wound Nurse who presented pictures of the resident's wound that was evaluated 2/26/25 and confirmed the finding that orders for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week on 1 of 61 days reviewed for RN coverage. Finding: On 10/3/2023, during review of Auguest and September 2023 staffing records, it was discovered that there was no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on Saturday, 9/23/2023. On 10/3/2023 at 10:15 a.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) she reviewed the documentation and stated that she was unaware of that information. The lack of RN coverage on 9/23/2023 was confirmed at 10:20 a.m.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's choice in the area of dental were being followed for 2 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for dental (Resident #15 and #26). Findings: 1. On 1/10/23 at 10:02 a.m., during an interview, Resident #15 stated that his/her teeth are not brushed daily stating, my daughter comes in and brushes my teeth, but she only comes in once a week. I need it at least once a day, maybe twice. Review of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) documentation for the personal hygiene task, which includes shaving, applying makeup, washing/drying face and hands, combing hair and brushing teeth indicates Resident #15 did not receive personal hygiene a total of 16 days from November 2022 through January 12, 2023. On 1/12/23 at 2:49 p.m., the above finding was discussed with the Director of Nursing. 2. On 1/9/23 at 1:28 p.m., during an interview, Resident #26 stated that his/her teeth had not been brushed in months. Review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) documentation for personal hygiene task, which includes shaving,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan by an interdisciplinary team (IDT), that included, to the extent possible, participation of the resident and/or his/her representative after each assessment for 3 of 24 sampled residents (#10, #26 and #53). Findings: 1. During review of Resident 10's medical record, the surveyor noted the following Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments: Significant Change in Status assessment dated [DATE], Quarterly Review assessments, dated 7/20/22 and 10/18/22 and another Significant Change in Status assessment dated [DATE]. The clinical record lacked evidence that a care plan meeting was held by the IDT for the above assessments. In addition, the last documented IDT meeting was held on 1/21/22. 2. During review of Resident 26's medical record, included a MDS Quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. The clinical record lacked evidence that a care plan meeting was held by the IDT for the10/26/22 Quarterly assessment. 3. On 1/9/23 at 11:17 a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored properly by having unlocked and unattended medication cart with medication stored on top of the cart allowing residents and unauthorized persons access to them on 1 of 5 days of survey. In addition, the facility failed to adequately date and properly dispose of open medications according to manufacturer specifications and failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the supply available for use on 2 of 4 units observed (Unit 2 and Unit 5). Findings: 1. On 1/13/23 at 12:00 p.m., on Unit 2, a surveyor observed an unlocked and unattended medication cart in the hallway outside of a resident room. On top of the cart was 2 plastic bins both containing various insulin vials, insulin pens and pen needles, in individual plastic bags labeled with the resident names. The RN walked out of a resident's room took something off the cart and stated, I forgot to lock it. She then locked the cart and walked back into a resident's room, leaving the insulins an needles unattended on top of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FIRST ATLANTIC HEALTHCARE — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $455K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME