No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Dexter Health Care

64 Park Street, Dexter, ME 04930 · For profit - Corporation · 53 certified beds · (207) 924-5516 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$10,033 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Aug 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $10,033 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-31)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
51 High St · (207) 924-3206 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.9 mi
188 Spring St · (207) 924-7000 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Hannaford0.3 mi
37 Church St · (207) 924-6410 · Call to confirm hours
Park
40 Main St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.6%24.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.5%5.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.8%2.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.5%11.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%4.1%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened37.0%25.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.0%17.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.0%29.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.2%20.2%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.7%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine56.7%74.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.2%20.8%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.0%16.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.491.451.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.582.011.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.2%CMS range 32.0–56.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 8.0–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened12.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.3–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.78
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.98
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
56.7%
Total nursing turnover
70.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 53 beds and averages 43.8 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.78 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-10)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-31)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-08-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's policy's, review of the Nursing Facility Reportable Incident Form, review of the facility investigative report, review of the clinical record, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from mental abuse, physical restraint, and involuntary seclusion. Specifically, Registered Nurse #1 (RN1) engaged in multiple abusive behaviors, including yelling at the resident repeatedly in response to the resident banging on the door and requesting to go outside, resulting in the resident being transferred to an acute care hospital. For 1of 2 residents sampled (Resident #1[R1]) for abuse. Findings:A facility document titled Identifying types of Abuse, revised 3/2025, indicated the following: Mental abuse is the use of verbal or non-verbal conduct which causes (or has the potential to cause) the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation. Verbal abuse may be a type of mental abuse. Verbal abuse includes the use of verbal, written or gestured communication, or sounds, to residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a complaint report, clinical record reviews, and interviews, the facility neglected to protect a resident from receiving another residents medications resulting in the resident being transported to an Acute Care Emergency Department and later admitted to the hospital for evaluation, monitoring and treatment of low blood pressure and syncope episodes. (Resident #31 [R31]). Finding: During a recertification survey surveyors were made aware that R31 received another residents medications the morning of 10/28/24 which resulted in R31 having to be transported to the Emergency department for evaluation and treatment. A review of R31's clinical record, in the nurse's notes, a nurse's note dated 10/28/24 at 6:30 a.m., documents that a medication was held due to an error in medication given, the night nurse was made aware and was told to wait for the day nurse of the incident. Nursing note dated 10/28/24 at 7:51 a.m., documents that R31 was given the wrong medication (another residents). he/she was given Gabapentin (anticonvulsant medication) 400 milligram (mg) Hydroxyzine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to perform wound vac dressing changes every 48 hours for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wound vac care (Resident #1 [R1]).Finding: On 5/27/25 at 9:20 a.m., in an interview with a hospital Social Worker (LMSW), she stated the facility called on 5/4/26 asking for wound vac supplies because they had none and that the wound vac dressing changes had not been done as of 5/4/26. The LMSW stated on 4/22/26, she discussed the resident retuning to the facility with a wound vac on 4/30/26. The LMSW indicated the last wound vac dressing change was completed on 4/29/26.On 4/27/26, a review of R1's clinical record was completed. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Documentation on R1's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated the resident had a physician's order for wound vac dressing changes every 48 hours.A review of R1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), indicated that R1 had the first dressing change done on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a clinical record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 1 of 1 sampled resident with a surgical wound. (Resident #1 [R1]).Finding:On 12/30/25 at 2:45 p.m., during a clinical record review for R1 there was an order dated 12/23/25 which instructed nursing to follow these instructions regarding wound dressing management. R1 should have daily dressing changes on surgical wound by his care team at the facility. He/she should also have his drain output recorded every 12 hours. The drain should stay in place until the first follow-up in the clinic in approximately 1 week. R1 had an amputation and returned to the facility with a surgical drain (supposed to stay in place 1 week until seen at the clinic), the nurse documented she found the drain almost out and that she called the surgical center and was told by the nurse to go and pull the drain. On 12/30/25 at 2:45 p.m. during interviews with the charge nurses and a review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for December 2025 and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented to prevent the spread of infections, including Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for open wounds. For 1 of 1 resident reviewed with open wounds. (Resident 1 [R1])Finding:A review of the sign posted on a resident's room indicated the following:Before entering the resident's room, a sign posted outside R1's room indicated that the Resident was on EBP. The sign indicated that staff were required to wear a gown, gloves protection when providing care.Review of facility policy on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 11/2017 with a revised date of 3/2025, indicates that EBP are required for any residents with a history of Multidrug Resistant Organism (MDRO) infections, with an indwelling catheter, or a chronic wound infection. For these residents, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is required for high-contact resident care activities, including dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene or grooming, device care, and with bed mobility, changing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, Medication Administration Record (MAR) review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Physician ordered medication was available for use for 1 of 14 residents observed during medication administration (Resident #12 [R12]).Findings:R12's clinical record contained a Physician order Lidocan External Patch 5 % (Lidocaine) [a patch that adheres to skin to decrease pain]. Apply to two patches lower back topically in the morning for pain. Apply one left side and one to right side remove after 12 hours - Start Date- 08/20/2025 0800. On 9/10/25 at 9:54 a.m. during a medication administration observation with a surveyor, the Certified Nursing Assistant - Medications (CNA-M) reviewed the order for R12's Lidocaine patches and stated to the surveyor that the medication was not available and that the nurse was aware. The CNA-M made an entry on the electronic health record, Effective Date: 09/10/2025 09:54 Type: Orders - Administration Note Lidocan External Patch 5 % Apply to two patches lower back topically in the morning for pain Apply one left side and one to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to a dignified existence for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse (Resident #44 [R44]).Findings: On 9/8/25 at 12:35 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, R44 stated a nurse refused to administer scheduled pain medication when requested and had shouted, in a public setting, that R44 didn't need pain medicine because R44 is paraplegic and can't feel pain anyway. R44 stated everyone could hear.On 9/9/25 at 3:25 p.m., a surveyor reviewed written statements from witnesses that corroborated R44's statement. Clinical record review indicates active diagnoses including paraplegia and chronic pain.On 9/10/25 at 11:00 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated R44 and the Licensed Practical Nurse did not get along, the Licensed Practical Nurse was usually assigned to another unit but was terminated following this incident. At this time the surveyor confirmed with the DON that R44's dignity was not protected when the License Practical Nurse publicly mocked R44's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for a resident requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Tube Feeding (Resident #6 [R6]). Finding: The facility's policy, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 3/2025, indicated that an example of when staff are to utilize these precautions are when providing device care or use such as a feeding tube. On 9/8/25, R6's clinical record was reviewed and indicated that R6 received Tube Feedings. On 9/9/25 at 2:01 p.m., a surveyor observed an Enhanced Barrier Precaution sign on the wall outside R6's door. On 9/9/25 at 2:19 p.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing, a surveyor confirmed that R6's care plan was not updated for Enhanced Barrier Precautions.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a significant medication error when a medication to control blood pressure was prepared and ready to be administered to a resident that was in excess of the prescribed dose as ordered by a physician for 1 of 14 residents reviewed during a medication administration observation (Resident #23 [R23]).Findings:On 9/10/25 at 8:41 a.m., during a medication administration observation a surveyor reviewed the electronic health record (EHR) for R23 with the Certified Medication Assistant - Medications (CNA-M) for Metoprolol Succinate ER Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 50 MG [milligram] (Metoprolol Succinate) Give 2 tablet by mouth one time a day. Pharmacy Active 8/12/2025 08:008/11/2025. On 9/10/25 at 8:42 a.m.,the CNA-M reviewed the order on the EHR, pulled a medication card from the medication cart for R23 that had a prescription written from PharMerica (the facility's pharmacy) on the card, METOPROLOL SUCC ER 100 MG TAB 1 TABLET BY MOUTH DAILY, and pop 2 tablets out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a contract was signed between the facility and Hospice Agency for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #4 [R4]) reviewed with services from St [NAME] Hospice. Finding: On 9/8/25 at 11:05 a.m., during entrance conference with the Administrator, a surveyor requested to review the Hospice contracts. On 9/9/25, a surveyor reviewed R4's clinical record who was admitted to the facility in April 2025. The resident was transferred to St. [NAME] Hospital where a contract was signed between the resident and St. [NAME] Hospice on 4/29/25 to provide Hospice services to the resident while at the facility. As of 9/9/25, R4 was still receiving Hospice services at the facility from St. [NAME] Hospice. On 9/9/25 at 2:45 p.m., the during an interview with a surveyor, the Administrator stated that she does not have a copy of the contract between the facility and St. [NAME] Hospice and that she has contacted the Hospice agency for a copy. On 9/10/25 at 10:33 a.m., during an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed for 1 of 3 residents who were on EBP (Resident #6 [R6]). Finding: The facility's policy, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 3/2025, indicated that an example of when staff are to utilize these precautions are when providing device care or use such as a feeding tube. The precautions included wearing a gown and gloves. On 9/8/25, R6's clinical record was reviewed and indicated that R6 received Tube Feedings. On 9/9/25 at 2:01 p.m., a surveyor observed an Enhanced Barrier Precaution sign on the wall outside R6's door. The surveyor observed disposable gowns and gloves in the room by the entrance. The surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN1) wash her hands and put on gloves but did not put on a gown. LPN1 checked placement of R6's feeding tube, flush the feeding tube and then attach the feeding setup tube to R6's feeding tube. On 9/9/25 at 2:12 p.m., while outside R6's room, standing next to the EBP sign, the surveyor asked LPN1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's Nursing Facility Reportable Incident Form and investigation, facility policy review, employee file review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from involuntary seclusion for 1 of 1 facility reported incidents reviewed (8/16/25).Finding:The facility's policy, Use of Restraints, revised 3/2025, indicated that seclusion, which is defined as the placement of the resident alone in a room, shall not be employed. On 8/18/25, the Division of Licensing and Certification received a Nursing Facility Reportable Incident Form for an incident that occurred on 8/16/25. The report indicated that staff reported that Resident #1 (R1) was exit seeking and escalating and saw Registered Nurse #1 (RN1) bring R1 back to his/her room and closed and held the door for a few seconds, up to a maybe a minute.On 8/26/25, RN1's employee file was reviewed and included a Performance Correction Notice, dated 8/18/25 that indicated RN1 was on leave, pending investigation, because of an incident with an allegation of abuse that included details that RN1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's investigation/written statements and interviews, the facility failed ensure that a resident was free from restraint when a Registered Nurse used body contact as a method of physical restraint to limit a resident's voluntary movement for 1 of 1 facility reported incidents reviewed (8/16/25). Finding:The facility's policy, Use of Restraints, revised 3/2025, indicated Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body. On 8/26/25, RN1's employee file was reviewed and included a Performance Correction Notice, dated 8/18/25 that indicated RN1 was on leave, pending investigation, because of an incident with an allegation of abuse that was considered restraining a resident that included details that RN1 held a resident's arms/hands down while resident was trying to hit staff. On 8/26/25, the surveyor reviewed the written statements and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, the Nursing Facility Reportable Incident Form and investigation review, timecard review, and interviews, the facility failed to protect residents after staff notification of concern of behavior by a Registered Nurse towards a Resident for 1 of 1 facility reported incident reviewed (8/16/25).Finding:The facility's Identifying types of Abuse, revised 3/2025, indicated the following: Mental abuse is the use of verbal or non-verbal conduct which causes (or has the potential to cause) the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation. Verbal abuse may be considered to be a type of mental abuse. Verbal abuse includes the use of verbal, written or gestured communication, or sounds, to residents within hearing distance, regardless of age, ability to comprehend, or disability.On 8/18/25, the Division of Licensing and Certification received a Nursing Facility Reportable Incident Form for an incident that occurred on 8/16/25. The report indicated that on 8/16/25, staff reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Nursing Facility Reportable Incident Form review and interview, the facility failed to notify the State Agency (Division of Licensing and Certification [DLC]) timely for an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 facility reported incidents reviewed (8/16/25).Finding:On 8/18/25, the Division of Licensing and Certification received a Nursing Facility Reportable Incident Form for an incident that occurred on 8/16/25. The report indicated that on 8/16/25, staff reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) that Resident #1 (R1) was agitated and Registered Nurse #1 (RN1) escalated resident's behavior to the point that R1 bit RN1's hand. Per documentation on this incident form, on 8/18/25, staff came to further report additional information to the events that occurred on 8/16/25 between RN1 and R1 that occurred when R1's behaviors were escalating and R1 was exit seeking, which included RN1 putting R1 in his/her room, closed the door and held the door for several seconds up to one minute. In addition, on 8/16/25 at 11:04 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant #1 (CNA1) reported to the DON via text…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility investigation with written statements, and interviews, the facility failed to fully develop and implement a care plan for a resident who was agitated and trying to leave the facility for 1 of 1 facility reported incidents reviewed (8/16/25) when staff observed a Registered Nurse yelling at the resident instead of approaching/speaking in a calm manner and for the intervention to distract the resident from eloping, the resident preferences was BLANK. Finding:On 8/18/25, the Division of Licensing and Certification received a Nursing Facility Reportable Incident Form for an incident that occurred on 8/16/25. The report indicated that staff reported that Resident #1 (R1) was exit seeking and escalating.On 8/26/25, R1's care plan was reviewed and included the following:Focus: The resident is an elopement risk/wanderer related to (r/t) safety awareness, dementia with interventions that included distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structure activities, food, conversation, television, book. Resident prefers: IS BLANK. This care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information which included documentation of Resident Representative notification of hospital transfer, charge nurse documentation of resident behaviors as directed per Treatment Administration Record (TAR), and documentation to indicate that a resident returned from the hospital for 1 of 1 facility reported incidents reviewed (8/16/25). On 8/26/25, the surveyor reviewed Resident #1's (R1) clinical record after an incident that occurred on 8/16/25 which resulted in R1 being transferred to the hospital for evaluation of increased behaviors. The clinical record lacked evidence of documentation on 8/16/25 of Resident Representative notification or an attempt to notify, notes from Registered Nurse #1 (RN1) who had signed of the treatment sheet that behaviors were monitored, or information regarding when R1 returned to the facility after being transferred from the hospital. On 8/26/25 at 1:35 p.m., during an interview with the Administrator and the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that physician orders for medications and treatments were followed for 6 of 25 sampled residents medications reviewed (Resident #11 [R11]), R14, R15, R27, R30, R144, ). Findings: 1. On 10/30/24, a review of R15's clinical record was completed. Documentation in R15's nurse's notes indicated that on 10/9/24, R15 was sent to the Emergency Department due to respiratory concerns. On 10/11/24, R15 returned from the hospital with an order for Levaquin (an antibiotic) 750 milligrams (mgs) by mouth everyday for 7 days to treat pneumonia. On 10/13/24, a nurse's note indicated R15 returned from the hospital with an order for Levaquin and this facility was notified by pharmacy that they sent a note to R15's physician regarding prior authorization for it's use and that the medication may be contraindicated with R15's other medicines. There has been no update from the physician. The nurse note indicated that R15 had not received the antibiotic. On 10/17/24, a nurse's note indicated that on 10/16/24, R15 was started on Levaquin.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Enhanced Barrier Precaution policy, Wound Care policy, record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections during pressure ulcer dressing changes for 2 of 2 residents requiring pressure ulcer dressing changes (Resident #17 [R17], and Resident #11 [R11]). In addition, the facility failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) pertaining to a Resident with an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 1 resident observed for urinary catheter care (R17). Findings: The Centers for Disease Control and prevention Definition and Scope of Enhanced Barrier Precautions: dated 6/23/24 states, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g., residents with wounds or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's choice in the area of bathing was being followed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #3 [R3]). Finding: On 10/28/24 at 12:30 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor and a resident representative, he/she stated that one of their concerns is that R3 does not always get his/her scheduled showers, and that staff tell them that because R3 was already washed he/she did not need a shower. The resident representative stated that R3 likes his/her showers and only gets one once a week. On 10/30/24, R3's electronic clinical record was reviewed which indicated that R3 was to receive a shower on Saturdays day shift. Review of the electronic clinical records electronic charting System (ECS) (facility was transitioning from one electronic system to another and went live with the new system on October 1, 2024) ECS shows documentation that for the Months of August and September R3 missed 5 showers. For the month of October, the new electronic charting Point Click Care system (PCC) lacks evidence that R3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building, resident equipment in good repair and in a sanitary condition for 2 of 2 environmental tours. On 10/30/24 at 1:35 p.m. through 1:55 p.m., and at 2:45 p.m., environmental tours were conducted with the Administrator. Findings were confirmed at the time of the observations. - room [ROOM NUMBER], the veneer on the dresser drawers was faded and had blotches of missing veneer, chipped wood and scratched. - room [ROOM NUMBER]B, the right upper corner of the dresser drawer was missing, chipped areas and a handle was askew. - Resident #11's wheelchair was observed to be dirty, the left armrest cushion was missing foam pieces, and the left leg/foot rest was taped creating an uncleanable surface. - room [ROOM NUMBER], the second drawer of the three drawer dresser was missing a piece of wood on one corner. - Resident #27's wheelchair was dirty and the left armrest was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a care plan intervention for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #27 [R27}). Finding: On 10/30/24, R27's care plan was reviewed and included an intervention added on 7/13/23 under the care area of Nutrition, to weigh the resident every week. On 10/30/24 at 9:32 a.m., a surveyor and Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Coordinator reviewed R27's weights documented in the electronic system for the month of October and noted that it lacked evidence of weekly weights from 9/29/24 - 10/5/24 and 10/13/24 - 10/19/24; the surveyor confirmed weights were not documented weekly during this review.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a physician order was followed for a pressure ulcer dressing change for 1 of 1 observation for Resident #11 [R11]. Finding: On 10/29/24, a surveyor reviewed R11's clinical record and noted that there was documentation of measurements on 10/7/24, 10/8/24, 10/23/24, 10/25/24 and 10/26/24 for R11's right 3rd toe pressure injury. On 10/29/24 at 2:25 p.m., a surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN1) complete a pressure ulcer dressing change for R11. The physician order directed staff to change the dressing to R11's Stage II, right third toe daily. The surveyor observed LPN1 remove the old dressing, cleanse the area, and apply the dressing to R11's second toe of the right foot. Upon exit of the room, the surveyor asked LPN1 to review the physician order and stated to LPN1 that she dressed the second toe. LPN1 went back to the room, removed R11's sock and LPN1, R11, and the surveyor noted the second toe was dressed and not the third. R11 stated, right foot, wrong toe. The surveyor confirmed that she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, which included signing orders for medications and treatments listed on the Physician Orders (block orders) in a timely manner for 1 of 11 residents reviewed (Residents #6 [R6]). Finding: On 10/28/24, R6's clinical record was reviewed and included block orders (60 day) signed by the physician on 7/11/24. The next block orders), including a 10-day grace period, needed review and the Physician's signature by 9/19/24; the Physician visited on 9/9/24 but failed to sign the block orders. On 10/30/24 at 11:29 a.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing, a surveyor confirmed that the last block orders were signed were 7/11/24, making them now 41 days late.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on daily schedules review and interview, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 2 of 7 weekend shifts reviewed for RN coverage. Findings: On 10/31/24 at 10:00 a.m., a surveyor reviewed the daily staffing schedules with the Administrator and Operations Consultant with the following confirmed: 1. On 10/13/24, there was no evidence of a RN in the building working 8 consecutive hours. 2. On 10/20/24, there was no evidence of a RN in the building working 8 consecutive hours.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a physician ordered renewal for an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication before entering into the new electronic charting system (PCC)'s current physician orders and entered this order without a stop date, making it available for administration for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #9 [R9]). Finding: On 10/31/24 at 8:40 a.m., R9's clinical record was reviewed with the Director of Nursing (DON). The surveyor noted that the physician orders in the old electronic charting system (ECS), included Lorazepam (anti-anxiety) that was to be administered as needed at bedtime thru 9/23/24. The DON was unable to find a new physician order to renew this medication in R9's clinical record. This Lorazepam PRN medication order was entered into the new electronic charting system (PCC) with a start date of 10/1/24 (the date PCC went into effect) without a physician order for the renewal and entered the medication order with no end date, making this medication available to be used greater than…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to label supplements with a thaw date and failed to remove expired food for 2 of 4 days of survey (10/28/24 and 10/29/24). In addition, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean manner for the exhaust fan located in the dishwashing room on the clean dish side for 3 of 4 days of survey (10/28/24 to 10/30/24). Findings: 1. On 10/28/24 at 11:30 a.m., during the initial walk through of the kitchen, a surveyor observed in the walk-in refrigerator, on a shelf was a box with 9 thawed health shakes supplements that were not labeled with a thaw date. Storage and handling instructions on the carton after thawing keep refrigerated, use within 14 days after thawing. On 10/28/24 at 11:45 a.m. the surveyor confirmed with the Dietary Manager that the health shakes did not have a thaw date on them or on the box. 2. On 10/28/24 at 11:30 a.m., on a shelf on the left side of the walk-in refrigerator there was a tray that held 6 individual serving cups labeled as coleslaw with a label to use by 10/28/24. On 10/29/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a clinical record contained complete and accurate information for 3 of 7 residents reviewed (Resident #11 [R11], R27, and R9). Findings: 1. On 10/30/24, R11's clinical record was reviewed and included an order, dated 3/3/24, for Protonix, 40 milligrams (mg) twice a day. On 10/30/24 at 3:30 p.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), a surveyor confirmed that during transfer of physician orders from the old electronic charting system (ECS) into the new electronic charting system (PCC) to begin on 10/1/24, this or was entered, in error, to be administered one time a day instead of twice a day. 2. On 10/30/24, R27's clinical record was reviewed and included a physician order, dated 12/6/22, for Trazodone 50 milligrams (mg) to be administered once a day; the clinical record lacked evidence of an order to discontinue this medication. On 10/30/24 at 2:14 p.m., during an interview with the DON, a surveyor confirmed that during transfer of physician orders from ECS to PCC to begin on 10/1/24, this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Physician ordered lab was completed and/or completed timely for a urine test for 2 of 2 residents reviewed with urinary symptoms (Resident #3 (R3) and R44). Findings: 1. On 11/6/23, R3's clinical record was reviewed and included the following physician orders: - On 10/3/23, an order was written by the provider for a Urine Fungal lab test. - On 10/17/23, a telephone order was written that directed staff to obtain a urine sample for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)/also second sample for Fungus. - On 10/31/23, an order was written by the provider for a urinalysis (UA) if possible which was entered on R3's treatment sheet to be completed on 11/2/23. The surveyor was unable to find a urine result for the 10/3/23 and 10/17/23 urinal fungal/fungus test and unable to find the results of the 10/31/23 physician order for the UA. On 11/6/23 at 11:10 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Nurse Manager (NM) stated that the 10/31/23 urine order that was to be completed on 11/2/23 was not obtained and was not sent to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident requiring feeding assistance was done in a dignified manner for 1 of 2 residents observed requiring feeding assistance (Resident #18 [R18]). Finding: On 11/6/23 between 12:41 p.m. through 12:50 p.m. two surveyors observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 walk over to R18's table, stand next to R18, picked up a spoon, and fed R18 two spoonful's of dessert. CNA1 immediately walked away from the table. A few moments later CNA1 asked CNA2 if she would feed R18 more dessert. Two surveyors observed CNA2 walk over to R18, stand beside him/her, picked up a spoon, and fed R18 a spoonful of dessert. CNA2 immediately walked away from the table. A few moments later CNA1 walked over to R18's table again, stood next to F18, picked up a spoon, and fed R18 another spoonful of dessert. CNA1 immediately walked away from the table. In an interview on 11/6/23 at 12:50 p.m., a surveyor confirmed the above finding with CNA1, and CNA2.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that transportation assistance was available and provided for a scheduled eye appointment for 1 of 2 Residents reviewed for eye appointments (Resident #31 [R31]). Finding: On 11/7/23 at 12:14 p.m. in an interview with a surveyor, the nurse scheduler stated that R31 was supposed to have an appointment with an Eye Doctor for a Cataract surgery consult on 10/17/23. The nurse scheduler stated she was told that she could not have the van that day. She stated their facility uses transportation from two other facilities and on 10/17/23 she was told that she could not use the transportation, another facility needed it. R31's appointment had to be canceled for 10/17/23, and the nurse scheduler stated that the next available eye appointment for R31 was not until 11/17/23, one month later. This finding was confirmed with the nurse scheduler at this time.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure weekly pressure ulcer documentation was completed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #6 [R6]. Finding: On 11/6/23, R6's clinical record was reviewed and indicated that R6 had an unstageable pressure ulcer to the left foot bunion area. The surveyor was unable to find weekly monitoring documented in the clinical record. On 11/8/23 at 11:25 a.m. during an interview with a surveyor, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the facility used their electronic charting system (ECS) as their pressure wound protocol for weekly monitoring and directed staff to document their assessment weekly (in the resident's treatment record). The surveyor requested information from the DON regarding the weekly assessments for R6. At 11:36 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the DON stated that that the pressure wound was first noted on 8/6/23 and measurements and a description of the wound was included in a nursing note. The daily and weekly assessments orders were entered into R6's treatment orders but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor and document the effectiveness of PRN (as needed) pain medications for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for pain control (Resident # [R} 3). Finding: The facility's policy, Pain Medications, Administering, facility last reviewed in 2/2022, indicated the purpose of this procedure was to provide guidelines for assessing resident's level of pain prior to administering analgesic pain medication. This included to conduct a pain assessment which could consist of gathering both subjective and objective data by using a pain intensity scale or FACES pain rating scale prior to administering the pain medication as ordered. Document the following in the clinical record: - Residents of the pain assessment, medication, dose, route of administration and the results of the medication. On 11/8/23, R3's clinical record was reviewed and indicated the following PRN medications were administered between 10/3/23 thru 10/13/23: On 10/5/23 at 1:36 a.m., the clinical record indicated that R3 received Acetaminophen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Provider wrote an electronic prescription and provided it to the pharmacy timely for a narcotic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident # [R] 3). This failure resulted in R3 having to wait 7 days in order to receive the medication. Finding: R3's clinical record was reviewed on 11/6/23. It included written physician orders, dated 10/3/23, for Oxycodone for pain as needed (PRN)/three times a day. On 10/4/23, a telephone order was written for clarification for the Oxycodone order to be PRN three times a day. On 10/6/23, a fax was sent to the Medical Provider by the facility asking if the Oxycodone could be scheduled versus as needed. This fax also indicated that an E-script (electronic prescription) was needed please! On 10/9/23, the facility sent another fax to the Medical Provider indicating that R3's family member was concerned that he/she has not been able to have the Oxycodone yet. The writer of this fax called the pharmacy and was told the pharmacy was still…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the supply available for use in 1 of 1 medication supply room (medication supply storage room behind nursing station), and 1 of 2 medication carts (medication cart A). Findings: On 11/8/23 between approximately 2:15 p.m. and 2:40 p.m., during a medication supply review with the Certified Nursing Aid-Medications (CNA-M), two surveyors observed the following: In the medication supply room behind the nursing station: - One vial of Humulin R (liquid vial of insulin) 10 ml (milliliter), located in a refrigerator, labeled cubex stock that was available for use with an expiration date of September 2023 - One vial of Humulin 70/30 (liquid vial of insulin) 10 ml, located in a refrigerator, labeled cubex stock that was available for use with an expiration date of September 2023 -One bottle of Fish Oil (a dietary supplement) 1200 mg (milligrams) 100 soft gel bottle that was available for use with an expiration date of April 2023 -One bottle of Ibuprofen (a nonsteroid anti-inflammatory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a physician order for an x-ray was completed timely for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #13 [R13]). Finding: On 11/8/23, R13's clinical record was reviewed. Documentation in the physician orders indicated that on 8/1/23, the physician ordered an x-ray of R13's left wrist and thumb related to potential fracture, increased pain and decreased mobility. The x-ray was scheduled on 8/2/23 for Mobile Lab to come to the facility and take the x-ray per order. Documentation in the radiology report, dated 8/6/23 (4 days after the order), indicated no fracture or dislocation. A review of R13's daily pain monitoring indicated there was no increase in his/her pain level while waiting for an x-ray and documentation on R13's Medication Administration Record indicated no as needed pain medication were administered. On 11/8/23 at 8:05 a.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the Mobile x-ray company did not take the x-ray timely and as scheduled because the x-ray company told her they were down…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and interview the facility failed to ensure that proper hand sanitizing and proper food handling during lunch service was followed for 1 of 2 lunch service observations in the dining room (11/6/23). Findings: On 11/6/23 between 12:41 p.m. through 12:50 p.m., two surveyors observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 contaminate her hands while clearing tables after lunch service. She picked up and handled used trays of food, dirty plates, bowls, and utensils, and placed them on a meal cart. CNA1 did not wash or sanitize her hands after contaminating them. CNA1 immediately walked over to R18 and was observed feeding him/her a spoonful of dessert with her contaminated hands. Two surveyors observed that CNA1 did not wash or sanitize her hands after touching dirty plates, bowls, and utensils. A surveyor discussed this finding at the time of observation with CNA1.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, review of the facility incident report, and investigation, the facility failed to ensure the entrance door locked/alarmed when a resident that wore an ankle secure care transmitter and had been identified as an elopement risk was able to leave the building unnoticed for 1 of 1 facility reported incidents reviewed (10/2/23). A nearby neighbor who lived 0.2 miles away called the facility to let staff know that Resident #1 was at their residence. Finding: Review of the facility's incident report sent to the State Agency, dated 10/2/23, indicated that [Resident #1] was wearing a secure care bracelet but was able to exit the facility unwitnessed. A near by neighbor called the facility to alert them that they had a resident at their property. On 10/5/23, the facility completed their investigation and sent it to the State Agency. This investigation indicated that after reviewing the facility cameras, it was found Resident #1 exited the front door at 5:34 p.m. The neighbor called the facility at 5:50 p.m.; staff immediately went to get Resident #1 from the neighbors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility reported incident form, record review, the facility 'Lifting Machine' policy and procedure, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not slide out of a Hoyer sling during a transfer for 1 of 3 residents requiring Hoyer transfer (Resident #1). Finding: On 8/30/23, a Nursing Facility Reportable Incident form, dated 8/20/23, and the 5-day Follow-Up form, dated 8/25/23, were reviewed. The forms indicated that on 8/20/23, Certified Nurse Assistant #1 (CNA1) and Certified Nurse Assistant #2 (CNA2) were using a Hoyer lift to transfer Resident #1 (R1) from his/her wheelchair to the bed. CNA1 failed to use the appropriate size sling and failed to properly apply the Hoyer lift sling resulting in R1 sliding out of the sling to the floor. R1 landed on the Hoyer lift legs causing a 9 centimeter (cm) long by 1.7 cm wide abrasion on his/her back. R1 was sent to the hospital for evaluation and returned to facility with no injuries other than the abrasion. On 8/30/23, R1's clinical record was reviewed. A discharge report from the hospital indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • No harm found · B2023-11-08 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives, the results of the most recent survey of the facility in 1 of 1 survey books. Finding: On 11/6/23 at 1:50 p.m., a surveyor observed the survey binder located in a rack across from the living room. This binder included the State Survey results, with the most recent results from a survey dated 8/10/22, although the State Agency had completed additional surveys on 8/16/22, 3/1/23, 6/15/23, 8/30/23, and 10/17/23. A surveyor confirmed this finding with the Administrator during this observation.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,033 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-10-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FIRST ATLANTIC HEALTHCARE — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BOWDEN, KENNETHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2019
COFFIN, CRAIGIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2019
OTIS-HIGGINS, ANDREAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/11/2015
PELKEY, WANDAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
FIRST ATLANTIC CORPORATIONOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/29/1988
MAINE MEDICAL CONSULTANTS PCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/19/2025
FRIDMAN, FREDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/11/2024
JOST, TAMMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2024
EASTERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTEROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
FIRST ATLANTIC HEALTHCARE INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/21/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$189K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 8%Other / private 24%

This home reported $189K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$375per resident / day
operating cost
$11,391per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$366per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maine Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maine
$13,976/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,904/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,205/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 205115. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next