Ashley Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 63 beds and averages 52.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2579353. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented for 1 resident (R203) of three residents reviewed for falls resulting in R203 falling from her raised bed to the floor and sustaining a fracture of her femur. Findings include:Review of an admission Record revealed R203 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included autism, anxiety, and developmental disorder. Review of current fall Care Plan interventions for R203, with a start date of 3/11/2025, directed staff to utilize a fall mat on the left side of bed and keep bed in lowest position when not providing care. Further review revealed another intervention started 3/8/2025 directed staff to keep frequently used items including the call light within reach while in room. Review of MI-FRI #61119 facility investigation report revealed R203 fell from her raised bed to the floor the afternoon of 7/20/2025 when Certified Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # MI00153789 and #MI00152893 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide quality care to one of three residents reviewed (Resident #100) resulting in the delay of on-going assessments including pain assessments and providing adequate pain relief, the initiation of potential hip fracture mobility interventions, and emergency medical treatment, following a fall that resulted in a fractured hip. Findings: Resident #100 (R100) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R100 was an [AGE] year old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease. Review of a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) completed on 06/16/25 reflected a score of 4 out of 15, that indicated R100 had severe cognitive impairment. During an interview on 06/25/25 at 11:45 AM, R100's durable power of attorney (DPOA)/family member K stated that on 06/17/25 around 2:08 PM the facility called and reported that R100 (a) had fallen sometime around 1:30 PM that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the code status for 1 resident (R18) of 1 resident reviewed for advance directives.Findings include:Review of an admission Record revealed R18 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Further review revealed he had a court appointed guardian.Review of R18's Care Conference Report note, dated 1/7/2026, revealed he planned to continue as full code status (full resuscitation and life sustaining treatment).Review of R18's Resident Code Status form, signed by his court appointed guardian 6/27/2025, revealed he wished to be full code.Review of R18's Physician's Orders, active 2/23/2026 revealed an order for R18 to be DNR (Do Not Resuscitate).In an interview on 2/23/2026 at 2:25 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) K stated I think he (R18) is full code. RN K then viewed his Medication Administration Record alert and Physician's Orders and reported he was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the discharge needs were met for 1 resident (R23) of two residents reviewed for discharge concerns. Findings include:Review of an admission Record revealed R23 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included type II diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, and hoarding disorder. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs) assessment for R23, with a reference date of 10/11/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R23 was cognitively intact. In an interview on 2/23/26 at 10:00 AM, R23 reported that she did not belong at the facility. R23 stated she was quite a distance from her home, and she had requested multiple times that she would like to move closer to where her family resides, possibly in a senior apartment. R23 reported that she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a patient centered care plan for pain and pressure ulcers for 1 Resident (R1) of 13 residents reviewed for care plans.Findings included: Review of R1's undated face sheet, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer of right upper back, urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus, morbid (severe) obesity, chronic pain, and pressure ulcer of unspecified part of back, unstageable. He was his own responsible party.During an interview with R1 in his room on 1/23/26 at 1:20 PM, R1 complained about staff not getting him placed correctly in bed. R1 said he is 6 feet tall, and staff do not get him high enough into bed. R1 was sitting in a recliner next to his bed during this interview. R1 said when staff put him on the bed his butt is not placed high enough for him to bend properly and it causes more pain to his tailbone. R1 said staff do not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders to treat and monitor health conditions for 1 Resident (R2) of 1 Resident reviewed for medical complaints.Findings included: Review of R2's undated face sheet, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: mild cognitive impairment, atypical facial pain, post-traumatic stress disorder and mild neurocognitive disorder. R2 was not his own responsible party.During an interview with R2 on 2/23/26 at 11:38 AM, R2 complained about his right ear hurting and buzzing. R2 said he has reported it to staff, but nothing is being done about it.During an interview with facility Social Worker (SW) A, SW A said R2 had complained about his ears ringing sometime in the last week. The Surveyor requested information on how the facility followed up with R2's concerns about his right ear.On 2/24/26 at 1:08 PM, Social Worker A provided a note form R2's physician dated 1/14/26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize, assess and respond to an acute change of condition for 1 (R29) resident of 2 residents reviewed for change of condition. Findings include:Review of an admission Record revealed R29 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, psychotic disturbance, anxiety, and insomnia. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs) assessment for R29, with a reference date of [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 13, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R29 was cognitively intact. Further documentation revealed was there evidence of an acute change in mental status from the resident's baseline, marked yes. Review of a Resident Code Status dated [DATE] revealed R29 was a Full code (Full resuscitation and life sustaining treatment desired). Review of a Hospice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to thoroughly assess skin on admission, do ongoing assessments, implement an effective treatment plan, and prevent the worsening of pressure ulcers for 1 resident (R1) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the worsening of a pressure ulcer.Findings included:A review of R1's face sheet, no date, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer of the right upper back, urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus, morbid (severe) obesity, chronic pain, and pressure ulcer of an unspecified part of the back, unstageable. He was his own responsible party.During an interview with R1 in his room on 1/23/26 at 1:20 PM, R1 complained about staff not getting him placed correctly in bed. R1 said he is 6 feet tall, and they do not get him high enough into bed. R1 was sitting in a recliner next to his bed during this interview. R1 said when staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor and implement a respiratory care plan for 1 Resident (R1) on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). Findings include: Review of R1's face sheet, no date, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer of the right upper back, urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus, morbid (severe) obesity, chronic pain, and pressure ulcer of unspecified part of back, unstageable. He was his own responsible party. During an interview conducted on 1/23/26 at 1:20 PM in his room, R1 complained that the facility never cleaned his CPAP machine or provided cleaning equipment or supplies. Review of R1's medical record did not reveal a physician order for the use of the CPAP machine or its care and cleaning. Further review of the medical record did not reveal a respiratory care plan for the use and care of the CPAP machine or ongoing respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to adequately treat 1 Resident (R1) for pain of 1 Resident reviewed for pain.Findings included: Review of R1's undated face sheet, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer of right upper back, urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus, morbid (severe) obesity, chronic pain, and pressure ulcer of unspecified part of back, unstageable. He was his own responsible party.During an interview with R1 in his room on 1/23/26 at 1:20 PM R1 complained about staff not getting him placed correctly in bed. R1 said he is 6 feet tall, and staff do not get him high enough into bed. R1 was sitting in a recliner next to his bed during this interview. R1 said when staff put him on the bed his butt is not placed high enough for him to bend properly and it causes more pain to his tailbone. R1 said staff do not listen or assist him in becoming more comfortable. R1 said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide laboratory services to meet the needs of one resident (R9) of one resident reviewed for laboratory services. Findings include:Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) admission record reflected R9 was admitted to the facility 9/18/2025 with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder.Review of the EMR Progress Notes for R9 reflected an entry dated 2/19/2026 at 9:44 AM. The entry reflected, (Name of Physician) in to evaluate and treat patient for recent increase in behaviors. Gave order to perform urinalysis and collect (comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) serum blood draw) Orders entered. Will collect urine.Review of the EMR Physician Orders for R9 did not reveal the orders had been entered as indicated by the Progress Note of 2/19/2026 at 9:44 AM.Further review of the EMR did not reveal any further documentation that lab specimens were obtained, lab results, monitoring for lab results, or attempts to determine the root cause of the recent increase in behaviors of R9.On 2/25/2026 at 1:25 PM, an interview was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate, clear, and concise Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for 2 residents (R18, and R9) of 14 residents reviewed.Findings include:R9 Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) admission record reflected R9 was admitted to the facility 9/18/2025 with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder. Review of the EMR Progress Notes for R9 reflected an entry dated 2/19/2026 at 9:44 AM. The entry reflected, (Name of Physician) in to evaluate and treat patient for recent increase in behaviors. Gave order to perform urinalysis and collect (comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) serum blood draw) Orders entered. Will collect urine. Review of the EMR Physician Orders for R9 did not reveal the orders had been entered as indicated by the Progress Note of 2/19/2026 at 9:44 AM. Further review of the EMR did not reveal any further documentation that lab specimens were obtained, of lab results, monitoring of the Resident, monitoring for lab results, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$70,904 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

• $17,686 — penalty dated 2025-08-13
• $53,218 — penalty dated 2024-02-15
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-10 for 15 days
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-16 for 34 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PIONEER HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $519K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI