Pine Creek Manor Skilled Nursing & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 57% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 43.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.80 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.48 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.88 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include:On 04/28/2026 at 8:50 AM an interview with Dietary Manager (DM) E regarding date marking found a receive date and open date should be marked on food items.On 04/28/2026 at 8:52 AM observed cut carrots wrapped in plastic with a facility marked date of 4/15 in the two-door refrigerator located in the dry storage room. Further observation found chopped carrots wrapped in plastic with a number four written on the outside. DM E discarded the items.On 04/28/2026 at 8:54 AM observed two containers of sliced tomatoes in plastic packages with no facility marked date. An interview at this time with DM E found they did not see a date and indicated they are supposed to be labeled. DM E discarded the items.According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking, (A) Except when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have an active plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in waterborne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility. Findings Include:On 04/28/2026 at 10:20 AM observed a hand sink with an inoperable hot water faucet in the laundry washing room. An interview with Laundry Aid (LA) H at this time found staff do not use the sink, and it has no warm water. On 04/28/2026 at 10:24 AM observed a utility sink located next to the hand sink in the laundry washing room with linens piled inside the basin. An interview with LA H at this time found the sink is not used, and the basin is used to store rags. Further observation found the sink had no drain line, and water was observed discharging directly onto the floor when turned on.On 04/28/2026 at 11:04 AM observed a shallow pool of cloudy water in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of the premises as well as proper storage of clean and sanitary supplies. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in satisfaction of living affecting all residents. Findings Include:On 04/28/2026 at 9:44 AM observed a mop sink in the soiled linen room with the hot water faucet missing. When the cold water faucet was turned on, water was observed leaking from the vacuum breaker.On 04/28/2026 at 9:49 AM observed the two-compartment utility sink in the soiled linen room with a chemical pre-dispensing system in place and the faucet left on. This set up puts undue back pressure on the faucet's internal atmospheric vacuum breaker (AVB), which can compromise the integrity of the mechanism.On 04/28/2026 at 10:00 AM observed the outdoor waste receptacle in an enclosure with debris scattered around the unit, including matted cardboard and leaves accumulated behind it. The side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to formulate an Advance Medical Directive (AMD- the written instruction relating to the provision of health care) for one (R7) of five residents reviewed for Advance Directives. Findings include: On 04/28/2026 at 12:22 P.M., a record review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R7 had a code status of Full Code with an admit date of 06/03/2025 and a diagnosis of Acute Cystitis without Hematuria, Schizophrenia, Diabetes and Peripheral Vascular Disease, Unspecified. Record review also revealed that R7 had a legal guardian. On 04/29/2026 at 11:20 A.M., Social Worker (SW) A was interviewed to discuss the formulation of a written Advanced Directive for R7. SW A was queried as to the expectations of Advance Directives for long term care residents within the facility. SW A stated, All residents should have documentation of an Advance Directive being offered. I should have documentation of an Advanced Directive for R7 but I don't. I do not have written documentation from R7's guardian.On 04/29/2026 at 2:15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that includes and supports the dementia care needs for one (R7) of one resident reviewed for care planning resulting in the potential to limit R7's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings include: On 04/28/2026 at 12:22 P.M., a record review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R7 was admitted to this facility on 06/03/2025 with a diagnosis of Acute Cystitis without Hematuria, Schizophrenia, Diabetes and Peripheral Vascular Disease, Unspecified.Record review of the (EHR) revealed a care plan dated: 2/26/26 without a Dementia diagnosis, goal, focus or interventions for this diagnosis within the care plan. Record review of R7's Care Plan dated 02/26/2026 revealed Focus: I HAVE DIAGNOSIS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA; MAY EXHIBIT SYMPTOMS OF DELUSIONS, DISORGANIZED THINKING, FLAT AFFECT, HALLUCINATIONS, SOCIAL WITHDRAWL, DEPRESSION, ABNORMAL MOTOR BEHAVIORS,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure pans were cleaned before stacking; 2. Properly date-label and store food in the kitchen; and 3. properly store ladles. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the kitchen, resulting in the increased potential for food borne illness. Findings include: On 3/10/25 at 8:45 AM an initial tour of the kitchen was performed with Dietary Manager (DM) F, the following was observed: 1. Five sheet trays were heavily soiled and stored with clean pans in the clean pot/pan storage area. DM F agreed the sheet trays were heavily soiled and said they should not be used and stated, We need new ones. 2. Six large soup ladles were observed hanging from the side bracket of the hood vent. DM F said the ladles should not be hanging from the vent. In the dry food storage room: 1. One opened frosting can not dated. 2. One family sized bag of potato chips opened not dated. 3. One box of instant mashed potatoes box opened not dated. DM F agreed all opened items should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter drainage bag was maintained in a dignified manner for one resident (R97) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters and dignity covers, resulting in the potential for embarrassment. Findings include: On 03/10/25 at 09:15 AM, an observation of R97's foley catheter bag was observed outside of the room, visible from the hallway. The foley catheter drainage bag had dark amber urine. The urinary drainage bag was without a dignity cover (a bag used to cover a urine drainage/collection bag, so urine is not visible). R97 was observed in bed laying on their back, wearing pants and no shirt. R97 was asked how long they've been at the facility. R97 said, Not long, I'm here for therapy because my legs don't work. R97 was asked about care at the facility and their foley catheter bag not covered. R97 said, It is what it is .I can't do anything about that. On 03/10/25 at 10:30 AM, Nurse D was interviewed and asked why R97…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an indwelling foley catheter was secured for one resident (R37) of two residents reviewed for catheter care with the potential to cause irritation and/or trauma. Findings include: On 3/11/25 at 1:28 PM, R37's foley catheter was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E. R37 was observed with no leg strap attached to the catheter. When LPN E was queried regarding the leg strap LPN E said the leg bag should have been attached with a strap. On 3/11/2025 at 2:25 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was interviewed and said residents should have leg straps when they have a catheter. The NHA explained leg straps are used to secure the catheter to prevent the catheter from being pulled out. Record review of R37 Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R37 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Acute pyelonephritis, Dementia, Pressure ulcer of right heel, Pressure ulcer of left heel, Pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice for oxygen administration for one (R7) of one resident reviewed for oxygen administration resulting in a R7 receiving supplemental oxygen therapy without a healthcare provider order. Findings include: On 03/10/25 at 10:45 AM, R7 was observed in bed on their back wearing a gown. Their left arm was bent at the elbow toward their chest. R7 was soft spoken and was able to answer basic questions. R7 was wearing supplemental oxygen via nasal canula (a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into the nose). R7's oxygen was at three liters per minute. The oxygen tubing was not labeled with a date. On 03/10/25 at 01:28 PM, R7 was observed wearing oxygen via nasal canula with oxygen at three liters per minute. The oxygen tubing was not labeled with a date. On 03/11/25 at 08:38 AM, R7 was observed in bed with his eyes closed wearing a gown. R7 was observed wearing supplemental oxygen via nasal canula at 3.5 liters. The oxygen tubing was not labeled with a date. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for the facilities census of 40 residents and its staff resulting in an increased chance of harm. Findings include: On 1/9/24 between 11:30 AM and 1:23 PM, during an environmental tour of the facility the following observations were made: The ice machine's door was observed cracked, glued, and separated in several areas. The exterior service entry doors were observed with a 1 inch gap on the vertical center seal allowing daylight to shine through the opening. The toilet and sink surround in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed cracked and in poor condition. The radiator's protective grates in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] were observed damaged and with portions missing. Additionally, in this room drawer handles were observed missing on the furniture. The south shower room exhaust fan was observed not functioning. The north shower room exhaust fan was observed not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PIONEER HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $441K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI