No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Oakridge Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center L

3161 Hilton Rd, Ferndale, MI 48220 · For profit - Corporation · 64 certified beds · (248) 547-6227 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (248) 547-6227 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations$62,259 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $62,259 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-08)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1938 Burdette St St Ste 108 · (888) 824-1970 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
717 E 9 Mile Rd · (248) 305-2275 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3155 Bermuda St · (313) 387-1600 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(248) 544-6767 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.3%10.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.6%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.6%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.3%12.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.5%19.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.6%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%5.1%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.2%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table28.8%14.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.0%79.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.7%24.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.8%11.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.661.841.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.941.641.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 83% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 7.0–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.63
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.82
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
38.2%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 49.9 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.82 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.63 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.91 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-08)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-24)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were given the opportunity to make decisions about their treatment for one (R32) of two residents reviewed for advance directives, resulting in R32 becoming distressed, tearful, and withdrawn after the facility attempted to petition (send to the hospital involuntarily for a psychiatric evaluation) him to the hospital when he refused dialysis, continuously expressing frustration with having a feeding tube, and not being included in conversations about his care. Findings include: On 5/5/25 at 9:28 AM, R32 was observed in bed sleeping. A tray containing breakfast was observed on the over bed table. A tube feeding pole with a pump was observed in the room, but was not attached to the resident or infusing. On 5/5/25 at 10:57 AM, R32 requested to have a conversation. R32 reported feeling frustrated with his legal guardian. R32 explained he had things to take care of outside of the facility, but his legal guardian did not return…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-04-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and implement interventions to address changes in range of motion (ROM) for one (R14) of two residents reviewed for limited ROM, resulting in R14 developing contractures in three fingers. Findings include: On 4/22/24 at 9:26 AM, R14 was observed lying in their bed. R14 was asked if they had any concerns about care at the facility. R14 explained when they were admitted , they could use their left hand, now it was useless and they had to keep a napkin in their palm to keep their fingernails from digging into their palm. Observation of R14's left hand revealed the middle, ring and little fingers bent down with the fingernail tips of the ring and little fingers making contact with R14's palm. When asked if they could straighten out their three fingers, R14 explained that was as far as they could straighten them. R14 was asked if staff could get their fingers straight. R14 explained they did not know, as no one ever tried to straighten…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent pressure ulcers were implemented and identify and treat two new pressure ulcers for one (R24) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the development of pressure ulcers to the outside of both knees, one which had green purulent drainage and caused the resident pain. Findings include: On 5/16/23 at 8:30 AM, 9:30 AM, and 10:45 AM, R24 was observed lying on their back in bed. They had heel protector boots on both feet and their legs turned out to the sides which placed the outer aspect of their knees in direct contact with the mattress. A low air loss mattress was observed. However, the console was not turned on. R24 was sleeping during all observations except for at 10:45 AM when they requested the head of their bed to be adjusted. Review of R24's clinical record revealed R24 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hypertension,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments were completed for four (R41, R16, R15 and R18) of 13 residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. Findings include: According to the Long-Term Care Facility (LTCF) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, link to the LTCF RAI User's Manual: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/finalmds-30-rai-manual-v1191october2024.pdf: .an accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources . Those sources must include the resident and direct care staff on all shifts, and should also include the resident's medical record, physician . R41 Review of the closed record revealed R41 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hypertension, acute kidney failure and diabetes. According to the MDS assessment dated [DATE], section A2105 which prompted the staff completing the assessment to indicate where the resident discharged to was incorrectly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were appropriately stored in a safe/sanitary manner in one medication cart reviewed. Findings include: On 5/8/25 at 10:40 AM, observation of the 2nd floor medication cart was made with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D. In the top drawer on the left, money was observed folded in the back right hand corner. LPN D was asked whose money it was. LPN D explained she did not know whose money it was. LPN D was asked how much money was there. LPN D unfolded the money to reveal four one dollar bills. When asked what she was going to do with the money, LPN D explained she would give it to the manager. Continued observation of the medication cart revealed in the third drawer on the left, an open bottle of hand sanitizer with a pump was in the same compartment as a nebulizer treatment for inhalation. LPN D was asked about the hand sanitizer. LPN D immediately removed the bottle of hand sanitizer and said it should not be there. On 5/8/25 at 12:09 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was accessible to the resident for one (R32) of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: On 5/6/25 at 9:28 AM, R32 was observed in bed sleeping. The call light, which was a long thin string attached to a switch, was observed behind the head of the bed on the floor. On 5/6/25 at 10:56 AM, R32 was observed in bed with the head of the bed at an incline. R32 asked for the head of the bed to be lowered. When queried about how he alerted staff when assistance was needed, R32 reported he used the call light. The call light remained behind the head of the bed on the floor. When queried about whether he could reach the call light string, R32 attempted to reach back and said he could not reach it. On 5/6/25 at 11:00 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 'I'. LPN 'I' reported all nursing staff were required to ensure residents had access to their call lights. At that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor and treat a skin tear for one (R16) of one resident reviewed for wounds. Findings include: On 5/6/25 at 8:53 AM, R16 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room. An undated adhesive foam bandage was observed on R16's right forearm. Shadowing of drainage was visible on the bandage. When asked about the bandage, R16 was not able to explain why it was there. On 5/6/25 at approximately 12:00 PM, R16 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room. The bandage on R16's right forearm with the same shadowing of drainage had the date 5/6/25 written on it. Review of the clinical record revealed R16 was admitted into the facility on 6/28/21 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: altered mental status, dementia and anxiety disorder. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R16 had severely impaired cognition and required the assistance of staff for activities of daily living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00152212. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor residents' skin according to physician's orders and appropriately implement preventative interventions for three (R15, R18, R23) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, who had a history of or were at risk of pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 5/6/25 at 9:25 AM, R15 was observed partially inclined in bed, lying on her back. A specialty air mattress was observed on R15's bed which was set to normal pressure and 400 pounds. Protective heel boots were observed in the room, but not on the resident. R15's heels were observed in contact directly with the mattress. On 5/6/25 at 10:56 AM, R15 was observed in the same position in bed and the air mattress was set to 400 pounds. R15 did not appear to weigh 400 pounds. R15's heels were observed in contact directly with the mattress and the heel boots were not applied. On 5/6/25 at 4:15 PM, R15 remained in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to thoroughly investigate and do a root cause analysis of a fall; and failed to consistently implement fall/accident prevention interventions as recommended for one (R34) of one resident reviewed for falls. This deficient practice has the potential for further falls with/without injury and resulted in hospital transfer of R34 for evaluation after fall. R34 R34 was a long-term care resident of the facility, originally admitted to facility on 9/24/24. R34's admitting diagnoses included dementia, personality disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and drug induced movement disorder, and unsteady gait with history of falls. Based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R34 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 indicative of severe cognitive impairment. An initial observation was completed on 5/6/25 at approximately 9:55 AM. R34 was observed sitting in the dining room in their wheelchair eating a snack. R34 had no shoes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review facility failed to ensure a resident admitted with an indwelling catheter was assessed for removal; failed follow-up with urologist as ordered and failed to have orders for catheter care for one (R23) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheter. This deficient practice has the potential to cause Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) and loss of normal bladder function. Findings include: Review of R23's clinical record revealed R23 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and they were recently hospitalized and readmitted back to the facility on 3/3/25. R23's admitting diagnoses included brain cancer (recent finding), urinary tract infection, post COVID, dementia, and compression fracture of the lumbar vertebrae (stable). Based on a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R23 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 11/15, indicative of moderate cognitive deficits. An initial observation was completed on 5/6/25 at approximately 10:15 AM. R23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and address a significant weight loss in a timely manner for one (R15) of one resident reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: On 5/6/25 at 9:25 AM, R15 was observed in bed eating her breakfast meal. A plate cover was observed over the plate and a bowl of cereal appeared eaten. When queried about the food in the facility, R15 opened the cover that was placed over the plate and said Yuck! The plate was observed to contain scrambled eggs and toast that were not eaten. R15 reported she did not like the food in the facility and did not ask for anything different when served something she did not like. R15 stated, I don't believe in that. When queried about whether she lost any weight, R15 reported she did not know. On 5/6/25 at approximately 12:00 PM, R15 was observed in bed eating her lunch meal. R15 was observed attempting to eat peaches from a bowl which fell into her lap when she tried to eat it. When queried about how the food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure irregularities identified by the consultant pharmacist and signed by the physician were completed for one (R16) of five residents reviewed for monthly medication regimen reviews. Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed R16 was admitted into the facility on 6/28/21 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: heart failure, dementia and anxiety disorder. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R16 had severely impaired cognition and required the assistance of staff for activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of a Note To Attending Physician/Prescriber by a Consultant Pharmacist dated 3/11/25 revealed a recommendation that read, .Please consider ordering the following labs: Lipid Panel, TSH (thyroid-stimulating hormone) levels . The Physician/Prescriber Response was marked AGREE and signed 3/13/25. Review of a Note To Attending Physician/Prescriber dated 4/15/25 revealed a recommendation that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate tracking and administration of the pneumococcal vaccinations for three (R143, R16 and R10) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Pneumococcal Vaccine (Series) revised 1/8/25 read in part, .Each resident will be offered a pneumococcal immunization upon admission . The type of pneumococcal vaccine (PCV15, PCV20, PCV21 or PPSV23) offered will depend upon the recipient's age, having certain risk conditions, and previously received pneumococcal vaccines, in accordance with current CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines and recommendations . R143 Review of the clinical record revealed R143 was admitted into the facility on 4/23/25 with diagnoses that included: fracture of right femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of a facility provided Michigan Care Improvement Registry (MCIR) report dated 4/23/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00145936. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the one resident (R902)'s right to be free from physical abuse a resident (R903). Findings include: A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) intake MI00145936 revealed an allegation of resident-to-resident physical abuse involving R903 (perpetrator) and R902 (victim) that occurred on 7/23/24 at 5:45 AM. A record review revealed R902 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and psychomotor deficit following a stroke. A Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) score assessed on 8/8/24 scored 15/15 indicating R902 was cognitively intact. A clinical record review revealed R903 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with right sided hemiparesis (weakness on right side of body) following a stroke, asthma, and heart disease. The BIMS assessed on 8/25/24 scored 13/15 indicating R903 was cognitively intact. On 10/8/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake Number MI00145339 Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive admission assessment for one resident (R701) of three residents reviewed for assessments. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed an allegation that noted R701 doesn't know when he needs to use the bathroom and can't control it because he's incontinent. Staff want to accompany him to the bathroom every few hours to see if he needs to go but he doesn't want to do that. He would rather use the brief and then alert staff when it needs to be changed . A review of R701's clinical record revealed R701 was admitted into the facility on 6/28/24 with diagnoses that included: type 2 diabetes mellitus. A review of R701's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments revealed he was not yet fully assessed. The MDS was noted to be in progress with a due date of 7/4/24 (14 days after admission). Some sections were complete, but others were not, including the assessment for bowel and bladder continence. On 7/16/24 at approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake Number MI00145339 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete an assessment for incontinence for one (R701) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed an allegation that noted R701 doesn't know when he needs to use the bathroom and can't control it because he's incontinent. Staff want to accompany him to the bathroom every few hours to see if he needs to go but he doesn't want to do that. He would rather use the brief and then alert staff when it needs to be changed . On 7/17/24 at 9:20 AM, 9:48 AM, and 10:30 AM, R701 was observed sleeping. R701 did not wake up when spoken to. A review of R701's clinical record revealed R701 was admitted into the facility on 6/28/24 with diagnoses that included: type 2 diabetes mellitus. A review of R701's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments revealed he was not yet fully assessed. The MDS was in progress and noted R701 had intact cognition, but was not assessed for urinary continence. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered and/or documented per professional standards of practice for three (R198, R196, R3 and R14) residents. Findings include: On 4/23/24 at 8:28 AM, A medication observation was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H for R198. As R198 was taking medications, R198 requested more water from LPN H at which time, LPN H left remaining medications on the bedside table and exited the room. LPN H returned to R198 with another glass of water and commented that the remaining medications should have not been left unattended and further stated, You, (referring to this surveyor) were here, so it was alright. On 4/23/24 at 8:39 AM, A medication observation was conducted with LPN H for R 196. During administration, an Albuterol inhaler (medication inhaled to relax the airway) was observed inside a box of gauze sponges and a bottle of peroxide. When inquired if the inhaler was part of the medications ordered, R196…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from hazards. This deficient practice had the potential to affect multiple residents who reside on the first floor. Findings include: On 4/22/24 at approximately 10:02 a.m., a portable oxygen tank was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] on the first floor propped up against the wall without being secured. On 4/22/24 at approximately 12:39 p.m., the portable oxygen tank was still observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] propped up against the wall without being secured. On 4/22/24 at approximately 2:38 p.m., a second oxygen tank that was free standing was observed behind the nursing station without any devices securing it such as a caddie or cradle On 4/23/24 at approximately 9:37 a.m., the oxygen tank in room [ROOM NUMBER] was still observed propped up against the wall without being secured. On 4/23/24 at approximately 9:40 a.m., Nurse Manager k was shown the oxygen tank in room [ROOM NUMBER] and they indicated that all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure expired medical supplies were removed, maintain daily log of refrigerator temperatures, and provide refrigerated medication at recommended temperature between 36-42-degree Fahrenheit (F) resulting in the potential for the decreased efficacy of medical supplies and medications. Findings include: [DATE] at 8:21 AM, An observation was conducted of the facility second floor medication storage room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) L. Initial entrance to the room revealed the refrigerator had no lock. The thermometer located inside on the top shelf noted temperature of 30-degree F. LPN L was unable to continue with the observation and was temporarily ceased. On [DATE] at 9:35 AM, a second attempt of the medication room observation was requested and conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON unlocked the medication storage room and identified the refrigerator was not locked. The pad lock was outside of the room next to the computer on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for three (R38, R43 and R6) of three residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: R38 On 4/22/23 at 9:37 AM, R38 was observed walking in the hallway on the 2nd floor wearing a very thin, stretchy light pink shirt and not wearing a brazier. R38 was observed to have large breasts, and her areola and nipples were visible through the shirt. Multiple times throughout the day R38 was observed walking in the hallway wearing the pink shirt and no brazier. Review of the clinical record revealed R38 was admitted into the facility on 3/28/23 with diagnoses that included: metabolic encehalopathy, Alzheimer's disease and restlessness and agitation. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R38 had severely impaired cognition. Review of R38's ADL (activities of daily living) care plan initiated 3/29/23 had an intervention that read, DRESSING: 1 person assist. On 4/23/24 at 9:50 AM, R38 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to evaluate, and clarify the residents advance directive code status for one resident (R4) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. Findings include: R4 was initially admitted to this facility on 2/16/22 with a medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm) and coronary artery disease. On 2/7/24, R4 returned to the facility after a hospitalization, and was readmitted to hospice care. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was assessed on 2/13/24 and R4 scored an eight, indicating mildly impaired cognition. On 4/22/24, the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and face sheet identified R4 as a hospice resident and designated code status was documented Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) (a legal document indicating in the event a person's heart or breathing stops, do not take measures to bring back to life). Further record review of the EMR identified an Advance Directive dated 9/9/2023, and revealed R4 elected for full resuscitation and life sustaining treatments. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This Citation pertains to Intake MI00142276. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a notification for transfer to the hospital for one resident (R19) resulting in R19's responsible party was not informed for the reason of transfer and admission to the hospital. Findings include: On 4/22/23, A clinical record review revealed that R19 was initially admitted to this facility on 7/20/20 with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes, stroke, dementia, anxiety, and depression. Further observation revealed R19 is bedbound, nonverbal, contracted and receives nutrition via a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Tube (a surgically inserted tube placed into the stomach to receive nutrition). A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score totaled three indicating R19 is severely cognitively impaired. Further record review revealed on 3/12/24, staff discovered the PEG tube for R19 was dislodged which required a transfer to the hospital to have a surgical procedure to replace. On 4/23/24 at 9:49 AM, The Nursing Home Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document within the medical record for two residents (R19, R20) that an identified irregularity identified from the medication regimen review (MMR) was acknowledged by the Physician/Prescriber to prevent adverse consequences related to medication therapy. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Regimen Review, dated 11/1/22 states.The Medication Regimen Review is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and adverse consequences .The MRR includes collaboration with other members of the interdisciplinary team .Facility staff shall act upon all recommendations according to procedures for addressing medication regimen review irregularities . R19 On 4/23/24, A clinical record review revealed R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for stroke, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food and liquid), dementia, anxiety, depression, and dependent on parental nutrition via a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a Physician ordered laboratory (lab) test for one resident (R27) of one resident reviewed for laboratory diagnostics, resulting in the potential for abnormal lab results to go unreported to the Physician. Findings include: On 4/22/24 at approximately 9:22 a.m., R27 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R27 was queried if they had any concerns and they indicated they weren't feeling well. On 4/22/24 the medical record for R27 was reviewed and revealed the following: R27 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Cerebral infarction, Paranoid schizophrenia and Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. A review of R27's MDS (Minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/6/24 revealed R27 needed assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. A Physicians's evaluation dated 4/11/24 revealed the following: .Following for complaint of dysuria. Patient has recently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented and staff were educated on proper procedures for two (R15 and R27) residents. Findings include: R15 On 4/22/24 at 9:47 AM, R15 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room. A urinary catheter bag was observed hanging from the wheelchair. No signs for EBP were observed on the door to the room, no personal protective equipment (PPE) was observed in or near R15's room. Throughout the day, no staff was observed to don PPE when providing care to R15. Review of the clinical record revealed R15 was admitted into the facility on 8/6/23 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: heart disease, schizoaffective disorder and urinary retention. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R15 had moderately impaired cognition, and had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of R15's indwelling urinary catheter care plan initiated 3/19/24 revealed no mention of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00141572. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly follow-up and communicate resolutions on grievances expressed by one resident (R901) of one resident reviewed for grievances resulting in frustration and ongoing concerns with communication. Findings include: A record review revealed that R901 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R901 was recently hospitalized and readmitted back to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Human immunodeficiency virus, severe malnutrition, respiratory failure, and encephalopathy (brain disease, damage, or malfunction). R901 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 3/15, indicative of severe impairment based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. It must be noted that R90's cognition had significantly improved since this assessment and an updated BIMS assessment was not available in R901's Electronic Medical Record (EMR). An initial observation was completed on 12/27/23, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00141572. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received the anti-viral treatment consistently as ordered by the physician and failed to follow up with the physician or practitioner when the ordered medication was not administered for one (R901) of two Residents reviewed for quality of care resulting in potential to result in complications from an infection. Findings include: A record review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that R901 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R901 was recently hospitalized and readmitted back to the facility on [DATE]. R901's admitting diagnoses included Human immunodeficiency virus, severe malnutrition, respiratory failure, and encephalopathy (brain disease, damage, or malfunction). R901 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 3/15, indicative of severe impairment based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. It must be noted that R90's cognition had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the exterior trash/refuse area in a sanitary manner, resulting in the increased potential for odors and the attraction of pests and rodents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: On 5/16/23 at 8:00 AM, the exterior trash/refuse area was observed. The side doors on both dumpsters were open, and there were bags of garbage on the ground near the dumpsters. In addition, there was trash debris scattered on the ground around the dumpsters. On 5/16/23 at 11:15 AM, Certified Dietary Manager was queried about the exterior dumpster area, and stated that Maintenance was responsible for keeping the area clean. According to the 2013 FDA Food Code section 5-501.113 Covering Receptacles, Receptacles and waste handling units for REFUSE, recyclables, and returnables shall be kept covered: (B) With tight-fitting lids or doors if kept outside the FOOD ESTABLISHMENT. According to the 2013 FDA Food Code section 5-501.115 Maintaining Refuse Areas and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program and plan that ensured an interdisciplinary approach to have identified, developed, and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct quality deficiencies, resulting in the reoccurrence of deficient practices related to the facility's physician services and facility's failure to develop and implement policies and procedures that identified high-risk problems within the facility, ensure data collection for all departments within the facility, and failed to establish procedures that focus on high-risk problems, resident safety and quality of care. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 44 residents that resided within the facility at the time of survey. Findings include: During the recertification survey conducted 5/16/23 to 5/19/23, concerns were identified regarding the timeliness of the required physician visits and the timeliness of the physician documentation into the resident electronic records for all of the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for all 23 residents who resided on the second floor, including R10, R30, R5, R17, R24, R2, and R37. Findings include: On 5/16/23 at 8:00 AM, a strong, foul urine odor was observed upon entrance to the second floor of the facility. There was a loud beeping noise that came from the smoke alarm in the dining room and in multiple other areas of the 2nd floor unit. On 5/16/23 at 8:20 AM, R10's room was observed to have dirty and stained privacy curtains. On 5/16/23 at 8:34 AM, R30 was observed lying in bed. A beeping sound was observed coming from the smoke alarm installed on the ceiling. R30 reported they had not been sleeping well and they Can't stand the beeping!. On 5/16/23 at 8:41AM, R5's room was observed. A urinal was observed hung on the door knob. The nightstand next to R5's bed was observed to have a piece of cake placed directly on the nightstand (with no plate). A urinal was hung behind the head of R5's bed that contained urine and trash. The floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize their abuse prohibition policy to ensure contracted nursing staff had appropriate background checks and fingerprints done before working in the facility for 13 of 13 contracted staff reviewed for criminal background checks. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Background Investigations dated 11/1/22, revealed, in part, the following: .The Human Resource department will conduct all applicable background investigation(s) on each individual making application for employment with this company . Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 11/1/22, revealed, in part, the following: .'Staff' includes employees .contractors .caregivers who provide care and services to residents on behalf of the facility .Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property .Background, reference, and credentials' checks shall be conducted on potential employees, contracted temporary staff .Screenings may be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided to three residents (R's 13, 17, 30) of three residents reviewed met professional standards of nursing practice. Findings include: Medication Administration Observation On 5/17/23 at 8:19 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) I was observed prepping the morning medications for R13. At 8:24 AM, RN I entered into the room of R13 and administered their morning medications. RN I was then observed to wash their hands, make a phone call to the physician, and then begin to prepare medications for the next resident. RN I failed to document the administration of R13's medications after administering the medications to R13 and before preparing the medications for the next resident. Review of R13's May 2023 MAR on 5/17/23 at 9:22 AM, confirmed that RN I had not signed off on any of R13's morning medications that was administered. RN I' failed to follow the policy of the facility regarding the administration of medications. On 5/17/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-18 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician visits/assessments were completed and documented for four (R's: 2, 28, 29, 38 & 39) of six residents reviewed for physician visits, resulting in the lack of documentation and increased potential for coordination of care due to lack of documentation. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Medical Records dated 3/22/22: .Healthcare practitioners will comply with requirements for medical records completion .The administrator and medical records coordinator will advise the medical director about issues related to medical records documentation and completion .Healthcare practitioner documentation will be timely, legible, and clinically pertinent .As part of medical QA/PI (Quality Assurance/Process Improvement) activities, the medical director will selectively review open medical records for appropriate and timely physician and other healthcare practitioner documentation, signatures, and record completion .Through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-18 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely physician visits for five (R2, R38, R29, R39 and R27) of five residents reviewed for frequency of physician visits. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Physician Visits and Physician Delegation dated 11/1/22 read in part, .The Physician should: a. See resident within 30 days of initial admission to the facility. b. The resident must be seen at least once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days after admission and at least every 60 days thereafter by physician or physician delegates appropriate by State law. c. Review the resident's total program of care including medications and treatments at each visit . R2 Review of the medical record revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: seizures, metabolic encephalopathy and heart disease. According to the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], R2 had modified independent cognition,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews the facility failed to consistently acknowledge and respond to the pharmacist consultant's recommendations for three residents (R's 16, 24 & 29) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R#16 On 5/16/23 at 9:44 AM, R16 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in the dining room. An interview was conducted with the resident at that time. Review of the medical record revealed R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 10/11/22 and diagnoses that included: Liver cell carcinoma, type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, metabolic encephalopathy, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Review of the pharmacist consultant's progress notes documented irregularities noted after completion of the medication regimen review (MRR) for the following dates: On 4/11/23- . This resident has diabetes. Please consider adding the following monitoring to follow this therapy: LABS ON THE CHART ARE A YEAR OLD . HgbA1c…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dress one (R5) of one resident reviewed for dignity, in clean clothing. Findings include: On 5/16/23 at 8:41 AM, R5 was observed propelling themselves in a wheelchair. R5's clothing appeared to be unclean with a dusty appearance and multiple stains on their shirt and pants. On 5/17/23 at 1:00 PM, R5 was observed wearing the same dirty clothing as the previous day. When queried about whether they had clothing to change into each day or how often staff assisted them with their clothing, R5 asked, Can you ask them? On 5/17/23 at 1:56 PM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 'D'. When queried about when the last time R5 changed into clean clothing, CNA D reported that if R5's clothing was stored in the closet in their room, their roommate put all the clothing on and urinated in it. CNA 'D' explained that laundry was asked to bring one outfit a day up so that R5 had clean clothing. CNA 'D' reported it did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (R24) of one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs had their call light accessible to them. Findings include: On 5/16/23 at 8:52 AM, R24 was observed lying in bed. Their call light was not visible and in reach of the resident. The remote used to adjust the bed was observed at the foot of the bed. On 5/16/23 at 10:45 AM, R24 was observed lying in bed. Their call light was not visible. The remote used to adjust the bed was observed at the foot of the bed. R24 asked for the head of their bed to be adjusted. When queried about using their call light to get assistance, R24 did not know where it was. At that time, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 'J' was asked where R24's call light was. CNA 'J' reached behind the head of the bed and pulled up the call light. When queried about how R24 was supposed to alert staff if they needed assistance or if there was an emergency, CNA 'J' stated, He just tells me what he needs when I come…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement the facility's policy on an Against Medical Advice (AMA) discharge to ensure a safe discharge for one (R43) of two residents reviewed as a closed record. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility six days later on 4/3/23. Review of the preadmission paperwork from the hospital provided to the facility upon R43's admission documented R43 was sent to the facility for rehabilitation and therapy after multiple falls that resulted in multiple fractures. Review of the progress notes revealed no documentation on why the resident was discharged from the facility on 4/3/23. Review of the medical record revealed a form titled Release From Responsibility For Discharge dated 4/3/23 at 9:45 AM, which documented in part, . This is to certify that I (R43's name), understand the consequences and acknowledge that I am leaving (facility name) against the advice of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure a level I Preadmission Screening (PAS)/Annual Resident Review (ARR) Mental Illness/Intellectual Disability/Related Conditions Identification was completed accurately and sent to local community mental health for a level II OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993) evaluation for one (R27) of four residents reviewed for PASARRs. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for the resident to be excluded from receiving necessary care and services appropriate to meet their mental health and intellectual disability needs. Findings include: On 5/16/23 at 9:47 AM, R27 was observed sitting in the dining room. Upon initial interview the resident appeared on guard regarding the interview questions, by responding with why do you want to know? Who did you say you are again? And asking why after every question asked. After a while, the resident warmed up a bit and began to participate in the interview. Review of the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans which addressed targeted behaviors and symptoms for the use of antipsychotic medication for one (R29) of five residents reviewed for care planning. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team dated 11/21/2022: .The facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident . On 5/16/23 at 9:11 AM and 5/17/23 at 11:00 AM, R29 was observed seated in wheelchair and was non-verbal. At each of these observations, R29 was observed to have significant puckering/smacking of their lips. Review of the clinical record revealed R29 was admitted into the facility on 7/2/22 with diagnoses that included: aphasia following other cerebrovascular disease, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition, depression, and suspected adult sexual abuse. According to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (R5) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) received a shower on a regular basis. Findings include: On 5/16/23 at 8:41 AM, R5 was observed propelling in a wheelchair. Their face appeared oily with scruffy facial hair. When queried about their preference for shaving, R5 reported they preferred to be clean shaven, but did not want to ask staff to do it. R5 reported they would need some assistance with shaving. On 5/17/23 at 1:00 PM, R5 was observed wearing the same dirty clothing as the previous day. The scruffy facial hair remained and their face appeared oily. When queried about how often they received a shower, R5 asked, Can you ask them (the staff)? On 5/17/23 at 1:56 PM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 'D'. When queried about when the last time R5 received a shower or bath, CNA 'D' reported they really needed to give R5 a shower and planned to do it that day. CNA 'D'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate administration of tube feeding formula in accordance with the physician order for one (R25) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include: On 5/16/23 at 9:21 AM, R25 was observed lying in bed. Tube feeding formula, Jevity 1.5 CAL, and water for flush and hydration was being delivered via a tube feeding pump. The pump indicated the Jevity 1.5 CAL feeding formula was being delivered at 50 mL/hr (milliliters per hour) and the water was being delivered at 40 mL/hr. Review of the clinical record revealed R25 was admitted into the facility on 2/16/22 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), severe protein-calorie malnutrition and Alzheimer's disease. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R25 had severely impaired cognition, and required the extensive to total assistance of staff for all activities of daily living (ADL's). The MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was a trauma survivor received care and services that accounted for experiences and identified and implemented interventions to mitigate triggers for one (R29) of one resident reviewed for trauma informed care, resulting in the potential for re-traumatization due to staff not being informed and knowledgeable of the resident's past trauma and lack of individualized care plan interventions. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Trauma Informed Care dated 11/1/2022: .Trauma results from an event, series of events, or set of circumstances that is experienced by an individual as physically or emotional harmful or life threatening and that has lasting adverse effects on the individual's functioning and mental, physical, social, emotional, or spiritual well-being. Common sources of trauma may include, but are not limited to .Physical, sexual, mental, and/or emotional abuse (past or present) .The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services to address mood, behavior, psychosocial well-being and/or trauma-informed care for two (R29 and R42) of five residents reviewed for social services, resulting in the increased potential for ongoing unaddressed physical, mental and psychosocial needs of the resident. Findings include: According to the facility's Social Worker job description dated 4/2/2021: .identifying each resident's social, emotional and psychological need .Developing and carrying out a plan to develop the resident's full potential during their stay .Core Responsibilities: Complete and document Social Work and Psychosocial assessments for all residents within 3 days of their admission or readmission .Completes, reviews and updates Care plans including: Psychosocial .Behavioral .Monitor the behavior log book and follow up on any new or changed behaviors noted .Monitor high risk residents including but no limited to .Psychiatric dx…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document administration of a controlled medication; pull medication from the back up supply when it was not available for administration; ensure medications were ordered timely and accurately; and failed to verify medications delivered by the pharmacy matched the physicians order for one (R30) resident. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Controlled Substance Administration & Accountability, dated 11/1/22, revealed, in part, the following: .All controlled substances obtained from a non-automated medication cart or cabinet are recorded on the designated usage form. Written documentation must be clearly legible with all applicable information provided .The Controlled Drug Record .serves the dual purpose of recording both narcotic disposition and patient administration .The Controlled Drug Record is a permanent medical record document and in conjunction with the MAR (medication administration record) is the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R38 On 5/16/23 at 9:36 AM and multiple observations throughout the survey, R38 was observed either sitting or lying on the bed, or self propelling himself in a wheelchair. At each of these observations, the interactions with R38 revealed the resident was alert, and readily initiated conversation with staff and peers. There were no observations of any hallucinations, delusions or paranoia. Review of the clinical record revealed R38 was admitted into the facility on 9/24/22 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: psychoactive substance abuse with unspecified psychoactive substance-induced disorder, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. According to the MDS assessment dated [DATE], R38 was cognitively intact and received antipsychotic medications. Review of R38's medications revealed an admission order of Aripiprazole (an antipsychotic) 15 mg (milligrams) one time a day was increased to 20 mg one time a day on 11/15/22. An additional antipsychotic, Quetiapine (Seroquel) 50 mg was ordered as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0775 — isolated
    Keep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory reports were contained in the clinical record for one (R29) of two residents reviewed for laboratory services, resulting in the increased potential for inability to effectively monitor changes in resident's condition due to lack of supporting documentation. Findings include: According to the facility's Laboratory Services and Reporting dated 11/2/2022: .The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents .The facility is responsible for the timeliness of the services .All laboratory reports will be dated and contain the name and address of the testing laboratory and will be filed in the resident's clinical record .Promptly notify the ordering physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist of laboratory results that fall outside the clinical reference range. Review of the clinical record revealed R29 was admitted into the facility on 7/2/22 with diagnoses that included: aphasia following other cerebrovascular disease, anorexia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective Antibiotic Stewardship program that included consistent implementation of protocols for appropriate antibiotic administration and ensured that infection criteria were met for two (R24 and R46) of seven residents reviewed for antibiotic use. Findings include: Review of the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes dated 2015, documented in part, .Improving the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect patients and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance is a national priority. Antibiotic stewardship refers to a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use .Antibiotics are among the most frequently prescribed medications in nursing homes, with up to 70% of residents in a nursing home receiving one or more courses of systemic antibiotics when followed over a year .studies have shown that 40-75% of antibiotics prescribed in nursing homes may be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate tracking and administration of the pneumococcal vaccinations for residents residing in the facility for two (R10 and R20) of five residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Pneumococcal Vaccine (Series) dated 11/1/22 read in part, .Each resident will be assessed for pneumococcal immunization upon admission . Each resident will be offered a pneumococcal immunization unless it it is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized. Following assessment for any medical contraindications, the immunization may be administered in accordance with physician approved 'standing orders' . R10 Review of the clinical record revealed R10 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. The Preventative Health Record did not reveal evidence of a pneumococcal vaccination. Review of a facility provided Michigan Care Improvement Registry (MCIR) report dated 5/18/23 revealed there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet per resident for 7 of 20 multiple resident rooms and failed to provide 100 square feet per resident for 3 of 4 single bed resident rooms, resulting in the potential for inadequate space and resident dissatisfaction with their living conditions. Findings Include: On 5/07/25 at 11:00 AM, the following Medicare/Medicaid resident rooms were observed: Room # Square Ft. Beds 102 227 3 103 93 1 107 222 3 109 222 3 110 231 3 111 83 1 203 93 1 204 230 3 205 224 3 207 225 3 The health and safety of the residents were not affected by the room size. Interviews revealed residents had no problems with their rooms.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet per resident for 16 of 20 multiple resident rooms and failed to provide 100 square feet per resident for 4 of 4 single bed resident rooms, resulting in the potential for inadequate space and resident dissatisfaction with their living conditions. Findings Include: On 4/22/24 at 2:00 pm, the following Medicare/Medicaid resident rooms were observed: Room # Square Ft. Beds 101 222 3 102 227 3 103 93 1 104 230 3 105 224 3 107 222 3 108 221 3 109 222 3 110 231 3 111 83 1 201 222 3 202 227 3 203 93 1 204 230 3 205 224 3 207 225 3 208 234 3 210 221 3 211 221 3 214 83 1 The health and safety of the residents were not affected by the room size. Interviews revealed residents had no problems with their rooms.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet per resident for 16 of 20 multiple resident rooms and failed to provide 100 square feet per resident for 4 of 4 single bed resident rooms, resulting in the potential for inadequate space and resident dissatisfaction with their living conditions. Findings Include: On 5/16/23 at 2:00 pm, the following Medicare/Medicaid resident rooms were observed: Room # Square Ft. Beds 101 222 3 102 227 3 103 93 1 104 230 3 105 224 3 107 222 3 108 221 3 109 222 3 110 231 3 111 83 1 201 222 3 202 227 3 203 93 1 204 230 3 205 224 3 207 225 3 208 234 3 210 221 3 211 221 3 214 83 1 The health and safety of the residents were not affected by the room size. Interviews revealed residents had no problems with their rooms.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$62,259 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $46,370 — penalty dated 2025-05-08
  • $15,889 — penalty dated 2024-04-24
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-04 for 9 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-21 for 10 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PIONEER HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
UDDIN, FAHIMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/16/2012
RAHMAN, SHARMINIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/05/2019

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$257K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 7%Other / private 93%

This home reported $257K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$286per resident / day
operating cost
$8,701per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$250per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235322. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next