No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Heritage Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

9500 Grand River Ave, Detroit, MI 48204 · For profit - Corporation · 122 certified beds · (313) 491-7920 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0565, F0567, F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
11803 Grand River Ave · (313) 491-5544 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
9212 Dexter Blvd · (313) 894-0300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5523 Oregon St · (313) 782-3815 · Call to confirm hours
Park
9516 Grand River Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5240 W Chicago St · (313) 931-1111

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.6%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.4%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.5%19.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine76.8%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%5.1%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.6%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.6%14.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine17.6%79.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.8%24.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.6%11.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.301.841.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.081.641.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 128 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

31.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.11U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF31.0%CMS range 23.6–43.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 8.5–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.1–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
1.05
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.55
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
53.6%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 100.3 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-06)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number 2723282.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect R201's right to be free from physical and mental abuse by Housekeeper D and Housekeeping Manager C, when Housekeeping Manager C sprayed a chemical (bleach cleaner) into the eyes of R201 while Housekeeper D held R201's wheelchair in place. This deficient practice caused chemical damage to R201's eyes and subsequent pain.Findings include: On 1/14/2026 at 8:51 AM, the State Agency (SA) received a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) with an allegation of staff to resident abuse.On 2/4/2026 at 10:00 AM, R201 was observed in bed and was interviewed about the reported incident to the SA. R201 stated, Some staff sprayed a chemical in my eyes. My right eye is still messed up, and I am having pain in it. R201 said the incident occurred in the sixth-floor hallway and said he was assaulted by several employees but could not identify the staff members. R201 stated, They also hit me with a broom.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00143878. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions and provide sufficient staff for supervision to prevent falls for one (R921) of four residents reviewed for accidents and supervision resulting in R921 being found unresponsive on the floor with a pool of blood around the resident's head. Findings include: The State Agency received a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) on [DATE] for an incident that occurred on [DATE]. The FRI reported that R921, a Hospice patient (receiving palliative care) was observed on the floor by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C on [DATE] at 7:50 AM with an injury of unknown source with serious bodily injury. An Event Report dated [DATE] indicated R921 was observed on the floor next to the bed. Assessments including X-rays revealed R921 did not sustain any injuries. Interventions that were to be immediately taken included a floor mat. A review of R921's care plans on [DATE] did not include 'falls' as a concern…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the use of hair restraints of staff working in the kitchen; 2. Effectively clean multiple surfaces in the kitchen (walls, ice machine, ice scoop holder, reach-in cooler floor, reach-in cooler storage racks); 3. Ensure cleaned pans and dishes were allowed to air dry before stacking; 4. Ensure surfaces inside the kitchen were smooth and easily cleanable (insulated foam board); and 5. Ensure cleaned ladles were properly stored. Findings include: On 3/3/26 at 8:40 AM during a tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) Q, the following items were noted: Dietary Aid (DA) U was observed operating the dish machine. DA U's facial hair was not covered with a beard guard. DM Q indicated DA U should have had on a beard guard that properly covered their facial hair. A ball of dust, approximately the size of a large marble, was protruding from a ceiling tile located above the prep handwashing sink. A panel inside of the ice machine was stained with a brown colored substance. When the panel was wiped with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper handling of clean linen resulting in the potential for infection among all residents in the facility.Findings include:On 3/5/2026 at approximately 8:20 AM, an observation and tour of the laundry room was conducted with the Housekeeping Manager (HM C). Two blue laundry barrels were observed near the washing and dryer machines. HM C said the barrels were used to transport washed linen to the dryer, and from the dryer to the clean linen area. Both barrels were observed to have paper tissue debris, dried corn kernels, and other unidentifiable debris. HM C confirmed these findings and stated, these barrels need to be kept clean. An undated policy titled, Laundry was provided and revealed the following: Linen can become contaminated with pathogens from contact with intact skin or body substances, or from environmental contaminants or contaminated hands.Separate carts will be used for transporting clean and contaminated linen. Carts will be cleaned when visibly soiled, and routinely according to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the reach-in juice cooler, the inside of the walk-in cooler and the walk-in freezer were properly maintained and in good working order. Findings include: On 3/3/26 at 8:40 AM during a tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) Q, the following items were noted: The door gaskets of the reach-in juice cooler were damaged and loose in several places. A metal threshold strip was not securely fixed to the floor inside of the walk-in cooler. A significant build-up of ice and condensation was visible on the outside of the walk-in freezer door. DM Q said the freezer door does not fully close. On 3/4/26 at 12:50 PM, DM Q said the maintenance supervisor was supposed to check the dietary maintenance log at least once a week. The Maintenance/Dietary Service Log was reviewed with DM Q and revealed the following: 10/30/25 Problem: Freezer door cracked. Solution: Working on it 11/14/25.2/1/26 Problem: Freezer built up on door. Solution: (Area blank.) During an interview on 3/5/26 at 3:14 PM, the Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the walls and cove base outside of the walk-in cooler were in good condition and cleanable and the leak in the janitor's closet was repaired correctly and timely. Findings include: On 3/3/26 at 8:40 AM during a tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) Q, the following items were noted: A metal baseboard, approximately eight by four inches, was missing on the outside of the walk-in cooler. The concrete floor in the janitor's closet (chemical closet) was observed to be damp and with standing water. Portions of the cinder block walls in the janitor's closet showed signs of peeling paint and moisture exposure. On 3/4/26 at 12:50 PM, DM Q said the maintenance supervisor was supposed to check the dietary maintenance log at least once a week. The Maintenance/Dietary Service Log was reviewed with DM Q and revealed the following: 12/1/25 Problem: Chemical closet still has leaks from 2nd floor. Solution: (Area blank.) 1/7/26 Problem: Chemical closet still leaking. Solution: (Area blank.) On 3/4/26 at 1:22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to deposit the resident personal funds (resident trust fund) in an interest-bearing account that is separate from the facility's operating account and credit all interest earned on the resident funds to that account. This deficient practice has the potential to affect R90 and 27 of 36 residents that had over $100.00 in the facility's resident trust fund account in the month of January 2026.On 3/4/26 at 1:44 PM, R90 reported that they received their $60.00 a month but it is always late. According to R90's Electronic Health Record (EHR), R90 admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included congestive heart failure. R90 had a court appointed Legal Guardian. R90's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R90 to be cognitively intact and totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living.On 3/5/26 at 10:09 AM during the facility task for resident's Personal Fund with the facility's Business Office Manager (BOM) G, the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a separate accounting system for the resident trust fund account and use generally accepted accounting principles for 35 residents utilizing the facility's resident trust fund account. This deficient practice has the potential for the misappropriation of resident's funds.Findings include:On 3/5/26 at 10:09 AM during the Personal Fund task with the facility's Business Office Manager (BOM) G, the resident's trust fund account was reviewed for the months of 12/2025, 1/2026, and 2/2026. BOM G produced facility created excel spread sheets that detailed each resident's activity within their account. At this time 35 residents were consistently using the trust fund. BOM G could not produce actual banking statements and stated, The corporate accountant manages the resident's trust funds. I have the quarterly statements and resident's monthly deposits and withdrawals on an accounting sheet, but I don't know if the resident's trust fund is in an interest-bearing account. I'll have to call the accountant. On 3/5/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide periodic reviews and to adequately update information on Advance Medical Directives (AMD- the written instruction relating to the provision of health care) for five (R5, R6, R55, R45, and R25) of thirteen residents reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: On 3/3/25 at 1:27 PM, R25's face sheet indicated R25 was a full code (in the event the resident stops breathing, and/or heart stops beating, healthcare providers will use all available aggressive life-saving measures). A Resident Code Status form dated 11/18/24 indicated R25 was a 'full code'. This form had the resident's initials next to it, a physician signature, and undeterminable facility staff signature. However, a Code status/Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Directive form with an earlier date of 5/16/23 indicated R25 was a 'Do Not Resuscitate (in the event the resident stops breathing, and/or heart stops beating, healthcare providers will not use any medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2792738. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure money was safe from misappropriation for one resident (R110) of two residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in missing resident funds. Findings include: A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 1/29/26 documented in part the following: The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) received a call from the corporate office on 1/29/26 that the social service employee (SSE) M was suspected of stealing money from R110. The NHA was informed by corporate office to speak with Business Office Manager (BOM) G to find out what happened. BOM G informed the NHA that R110 had been informed on 1/23/26 of a check that was returned due to insufficient funds. R110 informed BOM G that there was $4000.00 in the bank. R110 requested BOM G's assistance in a review of financial transactions. R110 did not have their bank card or wallet on them. R110 stated, The (SSE M) has it. BOM G went to the social service office and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2792738. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of misappropriation of resident property (MARP) to the State Agency in a timely matter for one resident (R110) out of two residents reviewed for abuse, which could result in additional missing resident funds. Findings include:On 1/29/26 the facility reported incident to the State Agency documented an allegation of misappropriation of resident property. A review of the facility's 5-Day abuse investigation summary dated 2/5/26 documented in part the following: The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) received a call from the corporate office on 1/29/26 that the social service employee (SSE) M was suspected of stealing money from R110. The NHA was informed by corporate office to speak with Business Office Manager (BOM) G to find out what happened. BOM G informed the NHA that R110 had a check written out to the facility that was returned on 1/23/26 due to insufficient funds. Per BOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2792738. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of misappropriation of resident property (MARP) for one resident (R110), out of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 1/29/26 documented in part the following: The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) received a call from the corporate office on 1/29/26 that the social service employee (SSE) M was suspected of stealing money from R110. The NHA was informed by corporate office to speak with Business Office Manager (BOM) G to find out what happened. BOM G informed the NHA that on 1/23/26, R110 had been informed of a check that was returned due to insufficient funds. Per BOM G, R110 requested their assistance to review banking transactions. R110 informed BOM G that there was $4000.00 in the bank. R110 did not have their bank card or wallet on them. R110 stated, The social worker has it. BOM G went to the social service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a supra-pubic (s/p, a tube inserted through the abdomen directly into the bladder to drain urine) indwelling urinary catheter care plan for one (R9) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheter.Findings include:On 3/4/26 at 9:35 AM R9 was observed seated on their bed in t-shirt and sweatpants. A urinary catheter tubing was observed pulling tightly downward from under R9's T-shirt. The catheter was attached to a collection bag resting on the floor. There was approximately 1 liter of urine in the collection bag. R9 was asked about the catheter and said, It's bothering me. R9 lifted up their T-shirt and lowered the waistband of their sweatpants to show the s/p catheter's insertion site. There was an anchoring device on the catheter, but it was not adhered to R9's body. The insertion site had no dressing over it and was open to air. A small shallow ulcer was observed around the stoma (surgically created hole the tubing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist a wheelchair dependent resident (R35), reliant on the use of the elevator to smoke, of one resident reviewed for smoking resulting in missed opportunities for smoking.Findings include: On 3/3/2026 at approximately 1:00 PM, R35 was observed in their wheelchair at the 2nd floor elevator. R35 said they were waiting to go outside and smoke. On 3/3/2026 at approximately 1:20 PM, R35 was observed at the 1st floor elevator. When asked if they went outside to smoke, R35 stated, no, I missed it. On 3/3/2026 at approximately 1:45 PM, R35 said that they miss their smoke breaks often because there is only one elevator out of two elevators in the building that work. R35 further said that it can take up to 30 minutes to get on the elevator because so many residents and staff are waiting to use it. In addition, R35 stated, It is very upsetting to miss my smoke breaks. If you miss it, it's a non-negotiable - they close the door and won't let you…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement appropriate indwelling urinary catheter care for one (R9) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheter care resulting in discomfort and irritation at R9's supra-pubic catheter (s/p, a tube inserted through the abdomen directly into the bladder to drain urine) insertion site along with the potential for infection and catheter dislodgement.Findings include:On 3/4/26 at 9:35 AM R9 was observed seated on their bed in t-shirt and sweatpants. A urinary catheter tubing was observed pulling tightly downward from under R9's T-shirt. The catheter was attached to a collection bag resting on the floor. There was approximately 1 liter of urine in the collection bag. R9 was asked about the catheter and said, It's bothering me. R9 lifted up their T-shirt and lowered the waistband of their sweatpants to show the s/p catheter's insertion site. There was an anchoring device on the catheter, but it was not adhered to R9's body. The insertion site…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare vegetables to the proper food consistency for four residents receiving pureed textured meals in the facility. Findings include: On 3/3/26 at 11:04 AM, during observations of the kitchen lunch service with Head [NAME] S and Dietary Manager (DM) Q, the steam table was set with pans of food ready to be served to facility residents. Due to a lack of space on the steam table, the pan of prepared pureed green beans, also ready to be served to the residents, was sitting in a pan of water on the hot stove. While taking food temperatures, the pureed green beans appeared lumpy. DM Q and the two State Surveyors present obtained and tasted a sample of the green beans. The consensus from the tasting was that the green beans contained lumps. DM Q said the green beans needed to be smoother. Head [NAME] S informed the staff on the tray line to put the meal tickets for the residents on pureed diets aside because the pureed green beans were being smooth out in the blender. On 3/4/26 at 12:34 PM, when Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to 1220384, 1220412, and 2569363.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R406) of five residents reviewed was free from abuse and exploitation of personal funds resulting in certified nursing assistant (CNA) A using a R406's debit card to make purchases totaling $1,900.Findings include:According to a facility reported incident, CNA A used R406's debit card to make a personal purchase.On 7/30/25 at 2:05 PM, R406 was interviewed regarding the incident. R406 acknowledged the incident and said that the facility had recovered some of the money taken from their debit card.On 7/31/25 at 11:00 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was interviewed regarding the incident and reported CNA A had taken R406's money and had made payments toward the $1,900 debit balance, reducing the amount owed to $570.42. The NHA said the facility provides education regarding abuse and expects staff to follow facility policies.Record reviewed noted that R406 was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00153787 Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment effecting 107 residents who consume food products, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage. Findings include: On 06/25/25 at 11:52 A.M., A comprehensive tour of the food service was conducted with Dietary Manager A. The following items were noted: The 3-compartment sink sanitizer basin chemical concentration was tested and observed to be more than 500 parts-per-million (PPM) quaternary ammonia. Dietary Manager A indicated she would contact the contractual vendor for necessary adjustments to the chemical dispensing assembly as soon as possible. The 2022 FDA Model Food Code section 4-501.114 states: A chemical SANITIZER used in a SANITIZING solution for a manual or mechanical operation at contact times specified under 4-703.11(C) shall meet the criteria specified under §7-204.11 Sanitizers, Criteria, shall be used in accordance with the EPA-registered label use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00153787 Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant effecting 107 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and decreased air quality. Findings include: On 06/25/25 at 12:10 P.M., 6 of 9 first floor Main Dining Room Portable Terminal Air Conditioning (PTAC) unit filters were observed heavily soiled with accumulated and encrusted dust/dirt deposits. The interior and exterior (PTAC) cabinet surfaces were also observed soiled with accumulated and encrusted dust/dirt deposits. Maintenance Director C indicated he would have staff thoroughly clean the filters and cabinet surfaces as soon as possible. On 06/25/25 at 12:15 P.M., The first floor Main Dining Room flooring surface was observed soiled with accumulated and encrusted dust/dirt/food residue deposits. On 06/25/25 at 12:20 P.M, An interview was conducted with Director of Housekeeping and Laundry Services E regarding current staffing levels. Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00153011. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document complete transfer and discharge information for one (R510) of two residents reviewed for the transfer/discharge process resulting in the potential for the receiving health care provider to be unaware of all the resident's healthcare needs. Findings include: The State agency received a complaint that R510 was improperly transferred. According to R510's Electronic Health Record the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included paraplegia and surgical repair of fractured right femur. A progress note dated 3/19/25 at 6:41 PM indicated R510 returned from the hospital and was then transferred to another long-term facility. There was no additional documentation. There was no transfer form to the hospital. There was no discharge plan, summary note or progress notes to indicate instructions had been given to either the receiving hospital or long-term care facility the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00148648. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish a record of receipt, disposition, or reconciliation of controlled drugs (a drug that the government regulates for possession and use, i.e. narcotics) in the facility's back-up box (secured storage unit of controlled drugs), resulting in the facility being unable to account for the receipt of, disposition of, or discrepancies of controlled drugs in the facility's back-up box with the potential for drug diversion and controlled drugs being unavailable to administer to residents as prescribed. Findings include: On 12/19/24 at 12:52 PM observation of the facility's narcotic back-up box with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed there was no plastic lock on the narcotic drawer. The lack of a lock indicated that the narcotic drawer had been opened after pharmacy had delivered a fully restocked narcotic supply. There was no documentation to indicate when pharmacy last delivered the back-up-box or when narcotics had been removed. A sheet of paper with multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain and address Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendations timely for two residents (R35 and R54) of five residents reviewed for medication regimen review, resulting in the continuance of unnecessary medications and a lack of communication of recommended medication changes between pharmacist and physician. Findings include: R35 On 12/20/24 at 12:00 P.M. review of monthly Pharmacy recommendations in the electronic Medical Record for R35, documented the following: Date: 9/9/24 Pharmacist Drug Regimen Review Please take the following action, described below See report. Recommend: please consider reducing this: Resident is on sliding scale insulin (Adelog) AMDA guideline does not suggest using sliding scale insulin because of its retrospective way Of treating hypoglycemic and the lack of evidence to support its efficiency in physiological needs of the body More according to the American Geriatric Society updated Beers Criteria, there is also to this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R9) was free from significant medication errors out of six residents reviewed for medication administration when only two doses of an antibiotic eye solution (Erythromycin Ophthalmic solution) was administered to the resident of the 56 doses prescribed, resulting in potential for prolonged signs and symptoms of a right eye infection. Findings include: On 12/17/24 at 12:07 PM R9 was observed lying in bed with tube feeding infusing through a feeding tube. The resident's right eye was sunken in and the lids were closed (the eyeball was not visible). A small amount of dried yellow crust was present on both the upper and lower lid. R9 was unable to be interviewed due to severe cognitive impairment. At 1:20 PM, R9's family member was interviewed and reported the resident had a right eye infection last month that was treated with antibiotic eye drops. R9's family member said the right eye infection had improved because…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate Antibiotic Stewardship Program, resulting in R9's antibiotic usage for an eye infection not being identified, monitored, or administered as prescribed. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents receiving antibiotics in the facility. Findings include: On 12/20/24 at 10:40 AM a review of the facility's Infection Control Program was conducted with the Infection Control Nurse, (IFC) D. IFC D said the facility follows McGeer's criteria (a standardized approach to surveillance and reporting of infections) when prescribing antibiotics to review the (antibiotic) usage for accuracy. Residents prescribed antibiotics are documented on the facility's infection report log for monitoring. The IFC nurse said they become aware of residents who are prescribed antibiotics for infections through communications in the facility's daily meetings, infection reports, and a list obtained from pharmacy. During review of the infection report log for November 2024 with IFC D the line listing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they consistently screened, educated, offered, and administered influenza vaccines for five (R4, R9, R40, R52, and R57) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations/immunizations resulting in R57 consenting to receive the influenza vaccine but not receiving it and the lack of vaccine screening, education, and offering to receive the vaccine for residents R4, R9, R40, and R52. Findings include: On 12/19/24 at approximately 2:00 PM, the five residents (R4, R9, R40, R52, and R57) reviewed for immunizations had no documentation to support they had been screened/assessed, educated on, offered, or administered the influenza vaccine in their Electronic Health Record (EHR). The Infection Control Nurse (IFC) D and the Corporate Clinical Director, Registered Nurse (RN) Q were interviewed at this time. IFC D said the facility used the State of Michigan Influenza Vaccination Assessment and Consent (VAC) form to document and track resident's vaccination…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice statements. Deficient Practice #1 Based on observation and interview the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical facility in good repair affecting 25 residents on the third floor, resulting in an unpleasant, non-homelike environment. Findings include: On 12/17/24 at 10:30 a.m. during an observation of the third-floor unit the floor tiles, walls, and base boards were observed to need deep cleaning. Floor tiles were observed cracked, chipped and needed to be replaced. Rooms were noted with cracked, missing floor tiles, broken resident equipment. The unit had a malodorous smell that lingered. Other concerns noted on the unit included: 1. Aluminum tape surrounding the air conditioning units were detached from the unit allowing air, gaping holes and visibility to the outside. 2. Floors in the hallway and resident's rooms had visible collection of dirt, food particles, dust and soiled areas around the base boards and perimeters of the floors. Floors were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the standards of practice for medication administration when 1.) an insulin pen was not primed (remove air bubbles from needle and cartridge) prior to administration of insulin to R53, 2.) medications through a PEG (feeding tube that is surgically placed through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach) were not individually crushed and separately flushed through the PEG tube for R9 and 3.) a physician's order for an anti-hypertensive medication was incorrectly transcribed on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for R9, resulting in the potential for an inaccurate amount of medication to be administered and decreased efficacy of the medications. Findings include: RR53 On 12/19/24 at 8:33 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E was observed preparing to administer 35 units of lantus insulin to R53 at the medication cart. LPN E retrieved a new lantus insulin pen and dialed the insulin pen to 35 units. LPN E proceeded to R53's bedside to administer the insulin. LPN E was queried on the process of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide hair care for two residents (R5 and R7) and a shave for one resident (R16) out of a sample of 14 residents reviewed for activities daily living (ADL's), resulting in unmet hygiene needs, loss of dignity and emotional distress. Findings include: On 12/17/24 at 10:20 A.M. during a tour of the third floor, R5 was identified as receiving care from a hospice company. The resident's hair was observed loose, standing straight to the ceiling and matted on the left side of R5's head. Mingled in the resident's hair were white balls and lint from the linen on the bed. R5 was observed on 12/18/27 at 1:50 P.M. and again on 12/19/24 at 12:00 P.M. R5's hair had not been combed and the presence of white lint balls were more pronounced. On 12/18/24 at 6:00 P.M. during an interview with the resident's guardian and brother, both family members mentioned that R5's hair at one time was combed by staff but had been told after inquiring that the Aide no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate supra-pubic catheter care for one (R37) of two residents reviewed for catheter care, resulting in discomfort at the insertion site, the potential for dislodgment of the catheter, and urinary tract infection. Findings include: On 12/17/24 at 1:02 PM R37 was observed in a wheelchair in the hallway with a catheter tubing pulling straight down from the resident's lower abdomen to a collection bag that was hanging from the back of the wheelchair frame. The catheter tubing was taut and had dark amber urine with some mucus draining into a collection bag with a dignity cover. The resident said he wanted his catheter repositioned because it bothered him. R37 went to his room and lifted his shirt to reveal the a supra-pubic (s/p) catheter insertion site (supra-pubic or s/p catheter is a flexible tube surgically inserted through the lower abdomen directly into the bladder to drain urine). The s/p cath insertion site was slightly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to justify the use of a PRN (as needed) antianxiety medication and document the rationale for open ended use for one resident (R54) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Record review of R54's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R54 was admitted into the facility on 7/15/23 with most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke), major depressive disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R54 had intact cognition. Review of R54's physician orders documented the resident's current medications as follows: -Xanax (alprazolam)- Schedule IV tablet; 0.5 mg (milligrams); amt(amount) ;1 oral. Special instructions take one tablet by mouth twice daily as needed. Start date 10/12/24. End date open ended. There was no 14 days stop date noted to the order. Review of R54's care plan revealed Problem:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper communication/documentation of Hospice services provided to one Resident (R5) of two reviewed for Hospice services, resulting in a lack of coordination of comprehensive services and care provided to the resident. Findings include: A review of R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 7/2/2022, with diagnoses of acute respiratory disease, sarcoidosis, paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, gout and hypothyroidism. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R5 was rarely understood and was severely impaired in cognitive skills for decision making, was incontinent of bowel and bladder and required one- two person to perform Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). On 12/18/24 at approximately 11:00 A.M. License Practical Nurse (LPN) R was queired concerning the location of the documentation from the hospice company that coordinated care with the facility. LPN R…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precaution were implemented for two residents (R1 and R9) out of twenty four residents reviewed for infection control, resulting in the potential for the transmission of infectious t organisms. Findings include: R1 On 12/19/2024 at 9:25 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant, (CNA) C, was observed to change the brief and provide other care without wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). On 12/19/24 at12:45 PM, observed Registered Nurse (RN) B and Wound Care Coordinator (WCC) A providing care to R1's stage IV sacral coccyx wound without wearing PPE. According to electronic health record (EHR), R1 was initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of sepsis, bacteriuria, stage IV pressure ulcer, and dementia. R1quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS) Assessment with a reference date of 11/5/2024 indicate R1had moderately impaired cognition with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 6/15. 12/19/24 2:24 PM, Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents call lights were properly functioning for one of four units, resulting in a potential for a delay in responding to care needs of the residents that resided on the unit. Findings include: On 12/17/24 at 10:30 A.M. during an observation on the third floor. Residents were observed with assorted bells in their rooms. During the observation the residents were queired concerning the use of the bells. R47 who was alert and oriented indicated he was not sure where the bell was but when he needed a nurse he went to the nursing station. R47's roommate interjected and stated residents on the unit were given the bells because the call lights were not working, and residents were told to use them when they needed help. R35 indicated sometimes the nurses might be down the hall and could not hear the bell. According to R35 sometimes you can ask someone to tell the nurses you need help. On 12/19/24 at 12:05 P.M., Director of Maintenance (DM) K was interviewed concerning the replacement of the call lights and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review or revise the care plan following falls for two residents (R701 and R704) out of three reviewed for fall care plan interventions. Findings include: R701 A review of the medical record revealed that R701 admitted into the facility on 1/8/2023 with the following diagnoses, Fracture of lower end of Right Tibia and Pressure Ulcer of Left Heel. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 6/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R701 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of Incident and Accident reports for R701 revealed that R701 had falls in the following days: 12/11/2023, 12/30/2023, 1/11/2024, and 4/11/2024. A review of the fall care plan revealed that the interventions had not been updated since 11/8/2023. R704 A review of the medical record revealed that R704 admitted into the facility with the following medical diagnoses, Cerebral Infarction and Epilepsy. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an intervention from the care plan for one resident (R702) out of three reviewed for fall care plans. Findings include: On 9/25/2024 at 9:52 AM, R702 was observed in their room sitting in their wheelchair. R702 was in the room alone and a fall mat was observed on the floor beside the bed. A review of the medical record revealed tat R702 admitted into the facility on 9/30/2022 with the following medical diagnoses, Dysphagia and Disorder of Brain. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 2/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R702 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the fall care plan revealed the following intervention, Start Date: 6/10/2024. Approach: Concave Mattress. On 9/25/2024 at 10:25 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was shown R702's mattress and was queried if it was a concave mattress. The DON stated R702's mattress was a regular mattress, not a concave one. The DON stated they were unsure why…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00144280. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to obtain resident weights for two residents who refused to be weighed (R902 and R903) out of three residents reviewed for nutrition, resulting in significant weight changes to go undetected. Findings include: R902 During an interview on 5/15/24 at 9:40 AM with Concerned Family Member (CFM) A, it was reported that R902 was observed during a recent visit to have lost weight. It was believed the facility was not watching the resident's diet. During an observation on 5/15/24 at 11:22 AM, R902 was observed lying in bed and declined to answer any questions. Record review of R902's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R902 was admitted into the facility on 6/7/23 with pertinent diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 3/15 and resident required substantial/maximal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes: MI00140904, MI00141103, MI00141276, MI00143450, MI00141973, and MI00142724 Based on observation, interview and ecord review, the facility failed to provide a functional call system that provides direct communication from the residents via the 2nd floor with no call light station, Resident rooms 215, 307, 312, 2nd floor shower room, 3rd floor shower room, and 4th floor shower rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that utilize the shower rooms and residents in rooms 215, 307 and 312. Findings include: During facility rounds on [DATE] at approximately 3:30 PM, it was observed that there was no call light panel/annunciator panel at the nurse's station to notify the staff members of any resident needs. A nurse on duty was queried about the missing panel and how they received alerts. Staff member reported that they did not realize that the call light box was not in place. Call lights in rooms 215, 307, 312 were not functional. Two residents reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to the intakes: MI00140904, MI00141103, MI00141276, MI00141360, MI00141973, MI00142127, and MI00143303 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain general repair and cleanliness of the resident rooms, and common areas with potential for avoidable contamination, injuries, and decrease in satisfaction of living affecting all 97 residents. Findings include: An initial observation was completed on 4/22/24 at approximately 10:30 AM. The surveyor was waiting near the elevator entrance. There were residents in wheelchairs and one other resident with no assistive device were coming out of the east elevator (elevator on the left side). The elevator had missing handrails on both sides. Multiple fixtures to secure the handrails were exposed. Two staff members were in the elevator. When the surveyor queried the staff member about the missing handrails the staff member reported that it had been missing for a few months. The lights on the elevator switches to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intakes: MI00143303 and MI00143980 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assist Resident Council to meet for monthly meetings consistently and failed to promptly follow up and resolve concerns and follow up consistently. Findings include: Multiple complaints received by the State Agency and reviewed during this survey had concerns with long call light wait times, concerns with facility's physical environment etc. A request was made to the facility administrator and director of nursing (DON) via e-mail on 4/23/24 at 11:35 AM to provide the resident council minutes for the facility from November-2023 to current date (April 2024) to review the Resident Council concern trends and facility's follow-up on the group concerns. On 4/23/24, at approximately 2:30 PM, Activities Director I reported the facility Administrator did not have any resident council meeting minutes or follow-up documentation for the requested dates. Activities Director I reported that they were new to the role and they had scheduled a day every month for their future…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00143232. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly conduct a thorough investigation for allegations of abuse/neglect, including an injury of unknown origin for seven (R910, R911, R915, R916, R917, R918, and R921) of 10 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. Findings include: R921: The State Agency received a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) on 4/12/24 for an incident that occurred on 4/10/24. The FRI reported that R921, a Hospice patient (receiving palliative care) was observed on the floor by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C on 4/11/24 at 7:50 AM with an injury of unknown source with serious bodily injury. There was no corresponding 5-day investigation report for this incident. The facility's 'Unusual Occurrence Report' dated 4/10/24, (2 days prior to the FRI) indicated R921 was observed in the room unresponsive on the floor with bleeding around the head on 4/10/24 at 8:30 AM. The type of injury was documented as 'unknown'. R921 did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes: MI00143303 and MI00143980 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow-up on grievances expressed by two (R912 and R919) of four Residents reviewed for grievances resulting in frustration and ongoing communication concerns. Findings Include: R912 R912 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R912's admitted diagnoses included Major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder and heart failure. Based on assessment dated [DATE], R912 had Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14/15, indicative of intact cognition. An observation was completed on 4/24/24 at approximately 2:00 PM. During the observation R912 reported that they were missing a bag with their personal belongings that included some important receipts, debit card, and clothes. R912 reported that the bag with their belongings were taken to the laundry. They had spoken with several staff members in the last two weeks and they still have received any follow up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00143878. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an injury of unknown origin to the Nursing Home Administrator and/or the State Agency (SA) for one ( R921) of 10 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. Findings include: The State Agency received a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) on 4/12/24 for an incident that occurred on 4/10/24. The FRI reported that R921, a Hospice patient (receiving palliative care) was observed on the floor by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C on 4/11/24 at 7:50 AM with an injury of unknown source with serious bodily injury. The facility's 'Unusual Occurrence Report' dated 4/10/24, (2 days prior to the FRI) indicated R921 was observed in the room unresponsive on the floor with bleeding around the head on 4/10/24 at 8:30 AM. The type of injury was documented as 'unknown'. R921 did not have vital signs. The Unusual Occurrence Report was signed by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)/Abuse Coordinator on 4/15/24. On 4/24/23 at 11:30 AM during an interview the NHA acknowledged that R921…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00142890. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent employee to resident abuse for one resident (R602) of four residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in R602 being hit in the face and sustaining a laceration and hematoma (bruising). Findings include: On 3/6/2024 at 1:30 PM, review of the admission Face Sheet documented R602 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, violent behavior, mood disorder, adjustment disorder, anxiety, and depressed mood. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R602 was severely impaired in cognitive (ability to think) skills for daily decision making and required supervision to perform all activities of daily living (ADL's). On 3/6/2024 at 1:40 PM, R602 was observed seated on the unit, neatly dressed, pleasantly confused, and frequently wandering the hallway. R602 approached Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) D gesturing and patting his chest smiling. Per the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice statements. Deficient Practice Statement #1 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer and document wound care treatments consistently for two residents (R1 and R72) out of three residents reviewed for skin care, resulting in the potential for spread of infection and worsening of wounds. Findings include: Resident #1 During an interview on 10/30/23 at 2:40 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B, it was reported that R1's pressure ulcer had healed on right heel a couple months ago. Review of R1's face sheet revealed admission into the facility on 1/13/23 with a primary diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy (chemical imbalance in blood). According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R1 had intact cognition and supervision during most Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). During an observation on 10/31/23 at 2:22 PM, R1's right heel was bandaged with gauze and was not dated. Upon further inspection R1 had an open area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-23 for 6 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-01 for 25 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PIONEER HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
UDDIN, FAHIMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/30/2012
HENDERSON, DARYLIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/01/2017

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 16%Other / private 84%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$311per resident / day
operating cost
$9,443per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$295per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235234. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next