Oakland Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center LL

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 41.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 69% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 29 beds and averages 17.0 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.57 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake #3010953 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to a safe, homelike environment by not properly inventorying and securing their valuables for one Resident (R803) of one resident reviewed. Findings include: Review of an intake received by the State Agency on 4/29/26 revealed: Resident (R803) reported to The Director of Nursing (DON)) that his golden chain with a cross and two rings were missing. (R803) stated that while he was playing (Name of card game) with the Activities Director (Staff E), she took his chain off of his neck, and stated that she had to use the bathroom, and would be right back. When she came back, (R803) stated that he requested for his chain but (Staff E) claimed that she did not have it. (R803) insisted that (Staff E) give him back his jewelry, but she maintained that she did not have it. The (Nursing Home) Administrator (NHA) received a call from The Director of Nursing (DON) reporting the incident. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake #3010953 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation for one Resident (R803) of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of an intake received by the State Agency on 4/29/26 revealed: Resident (R803) reported to The Director of Nursing (DON)) that his golden chain with a cross and two rings were missing. (R803) stated that while he was playing (Name of card game) with the Activities Director (Staff E), she took his chain off of his neck, and stated that she had to use the bathroom, and would be right back. When she came back, (R803) stated that he requested for his chain but (Staff E) claimed that she did not have it. (R803) insisted that (Staff E) give him back his jewelry, but she maintained that she did not have it. The (Nursing Home) Administrator (NHA) received a call from The Director of Nursing (DON) reporting the incident. The administrator (NHA) initiated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake 3010953. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation timely for one Resident (R803) of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include:Review of an intake received by the State Agency on 4/29/26 revealed: Resident (R803) reported to The Director of Nursing (DON)) that his golden chain with a cross and two rings were missing. (R803) stated that while he was playing (Name of card game) with the Activities Director (Staff E), she took his chain off of his neck, and stated that she had to use the bathroom, and would be right back. When she came back, (R803) stated that he requested for his chain but (Staff E) claimed that she did not have it. (R803) insisted that (Staff E) give him back his jewelry, but she maintained that she did not have it. The (Nursing Home) Administrator (NHA) received a call from The Director of Nursing (DON) reporting the incident. The administrator (NHA) initiated the investigation as it relates to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake 2731788. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate documentation for skin and wound treatment for one Resident (R802) of two residents reviewed for skin and wounds. Findings include: A complaint received by the State Agency on 2/02/26 revealed: Complainant states the resident (R802) has developed deep bedsores on her buttocks that staff have to pack. The complainant states he hasn't seen the sores, but his wife said they were deep. The complainant states on an unknown date, an unknown female nurse applied menthol to the resident's buttocks which made her cry in pain. Complainant states the resident is left in a urine-soaked brief for up to 8 hours before being changed. Review of R802's census revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] and were discharged [DATE].Review of R802's profile revealed they were their own responsible party. Review of R802's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed they were admitted with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review the facility failed to ensure medication and treatment supplies were secured to prevent unauthorized access, as evidence by an unlocked treatment cart accessible in-patient care area. Findings include:On 1/26/26 at 8:44 AM, the facility medication treatment cart was observed unlocked and unsecured across from the nurse's station. On 1/26/26 at 9:18 AM, the medication treatment cart was observed unlocked. Nurse E was interviewed and asked should the treatment cart be locked, Nurse E reported yes and proceeded to lock the cart. On 1/26/26 at 1:32 PM, the facility's medication treatment cart was observed unlocked and unsecured across from the nurse's station. On 1/27/26 at 8:21 AM, the facility's medication treatment cart was observed unlocked and unsecured across from the nurse's station. On 1/27/26 at 12:03 PM, the director of nursing (DON), was interviewed and asked should treatment carts be locked when unattended the DON reported the carts should be locked. There was no additional information provided at the exit of survey.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an ongoing resident-centered activities program to provide meaningful activities per resident preferences to support their physical, emotional, cognitive, and psychosocial well-being for five residents (R6, R9, R10, R15 and R30) of five residents reviewed for activities. Findings include:Review of the resident census upon survey entry was 21 residents, confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) / Director of Nursing (DON), who assumed both roles upon hire, on/ near 1/09/26. On 1/26/26 at approximately 10:05 a.m., the NHA/DON described upon entry that the facility was a sub-acute short-stay rehabilitation unit (facility). It was clarified there were only two long-term care residents at the facility, R2 and R3, who would mainly require activities. When asked about resident council, the NHA/DON explained they had no resident council president, as there were no resident council meetings in the facility. This Surveyor asked to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0680 — pattern
  Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a qualified activity professional who directed and oversaw an ongoing activity program to ensure meaningful activities were provided consistently per resident preferences for four Residents (R6, R9, R10, and R15) of four residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the resident census upon survey entry was 21 residents, confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) / Director of Nursing (DON), who assumed both roles upon date of hire, on/near 1/09/26. On 1/26/26 at approximately 10:05 a.m., the NHA/DON described upon entry that the facility was a sub-acute short-stay rehabilitation unit (facility). It was clarified there were only two long-term care residents at the facility, who would mainly require activities. When asked about resident council, the NHA/DON explained they had no resident council president, as there were no resident council meetings in the facility. This Surveyor asked to speak with the Activity Director for clarification on the resident council process. The NHA/DON reported they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate Geri-chair [reclining chair with wheels] for two (R3 and R30) of two residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include:R3On 1/26/26 at 9:01 AM, R3 was observed lying in bed. R3 was asked if she was able to get out of bed. R3 explained she wanted to get out of the bed, but she had not been up in a long time. R3 was asked if she used a wheelchair. R3 explained they would bring in a reclining chair and put her in that, but it had been a long time since she had seen it. No wheelchair or geri-chair were observed in R3's room.On 1/26/26 at 12:52 PM, R3 was observed sitting in a tan colored geri-chair in her room. R3 explained with a smile that it was the first time she had been up in a long time and she was happy. Review of the clinical record revealed R3 was admitted into the facility o 7/31/25 with diagnoses that included: metabolic encephalopathy, muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) discharge assessment for one Resident (R7) of one resident reviewed for resident assessments. Findings include:Review of the recertification survey documentation software in the triggered task, Resident Assessment, revealed R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and their MDS record was over [AGE] years old (had not been completed).Review of R7's resident census in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] on a Skilled Level of Care and was discharged on 9/16/25.Review of R7's nursing Discharge summary, dated [DATE], closed on 9/18/25 by the MDS nurse, Registered Nurse (RN) C , revealed R7 was discharged from the facility on 9/16/25 with an AMA (Against Medical Advice) status, and had been admitted on [DATE] for therapy.Review of R7's MDS assessment page on 1/28/26 at 1:21 p.m., with RN C , revealed there was no MDS discharge assessment.On 1/28/26 at 1:23 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an accurate, consistent description and assessment of a wound for one Resident (R15) of one resident reviewed for skin management/ wound care, per best practice standards. Findings include:On 1/26/26 at 1:28 p.m., R15 was observed seated in a high-back wheelchair outside their room. A thin gel wheelchair cushion was underneath them in their wheelchair.On 1/26/26 at 1:29 p.m., R15's bed was observed. There was a standard mattress on their bed.Review of R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/15/26, showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, arteriosclerotic heart disease, and kidney disease. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment revealed a score of 4/15, which showed R15 had cognitive impairment. The assessment revealed that R15 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of R15's Care Plan (CP), accessed 1/27/26, revealed, Problem: I have a pressure ulcer: due…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PIONEER HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $15K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI