Hampton Nursing and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 87 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 45.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.00 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.60 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.13 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.76 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate nursing staff to ensure that the needs of the residents were met, resulting in insufficient and unmet resident care needs, and residents' feelings of frustration. Findings include: Record review of the facility submitted 'PBJ Staffing 2 Quarter 2025 ([DATE]-March 31) identified low weekend staffing for the first quarter 2025. Record review of the facility 'Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing' Policy Statement revealed that the facility provides sufficient numbers of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. Record review of 'Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing' Policy Statement revealed the facility provides sufficient numbers of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services for all residents in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated with dignity and had their needs met timely for a private group of residents and Resident #10, Resident #39 and Resident #41, resulting in complaints of being talked down to, feelings of sadness , diminished self-worth and not having their needs met as they wished. Findings include: Resident #39: On 6/24/25, at 11:12 AM, Resident #39 was resting in their bed. They complained their needs were met half of the time. Resident #39 used a writing board for communication. Resident #39 wrote on their communication board when Aide H answers my light she says do it on your own. On 6/25/25, at 10:15 AM, During Resident council task, the Residents were asked if they get care when they need it and unanimously all residents stated, No. The following complaints were voiced regarding getting their needs met: They don't have enough people If they're busy with someone that really needs their help, you have to wait longer There is usually not enough aides We're lucky if we get 2 aides Most of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike shower room for the 100-Hall and failed to ensure a clean functioning shower room for the 200-Hall shower room for all residents who use the shower rooms for hygiene, resulting in black residue on shower tiles, chipped off sharp tile edges and a non-functioning shower on the 200-Hall. Findings include: On 6/24/25, at 12:07 PM, an observation of the only working shower room in the building was conducted with Aide H. The wall tiles in the shower area had a black residue. The caulking in the corners had a black residue. The outside shower corner behind the curtain had an area approximately 10 inches high of chipped off tiles. The drywall underneath was also chipped away. There was a black residue on the exposed areas. The tile edges appeared sharp. On 6/24/25, at 12:13 PM, An interview with the Administrator was conducted regarding the shower room. The Administrator offered they had a quote to repair both shower rooms as the shower room on the 200 hall was not in use since they had the tub…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Follow care plans for Activities of Daily living (ADL) care for two residents (#5, #96) and 2.) follow care plan for daily dressing change for Resident #18, resulting in Resident #18 and Resident #96 to appear to be in need of showers and hair care, and Resident #18 to have a post-surgical incision dressing change timely. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Care Planning- Interdisciplinary team' policy dated 3/2025, revealed the interdisciplinary team is responsible for the development of resident care plans. The IDT includes but is not limited to: the resident ' s attending physician; a registered nurse with responsibility for the resident; a nursing assistant with responsibility for the resident; a member of the food and nutrition services staff; to the extent practicable, the resident and/or the resident ' s representative; and other staff as appropriate or necessary to meet the needs of the resident, or as requested by the resident. Activities of Daily Living Resident #5: Observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to ensure that Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care was provided for 5 Residents (#5, #10, #38, #41 and #96) of 5 residents reviewed for personal hygiene/showers, resulting in poor hygiene and the potential for skin irritation, body odor and feelings of embarrassment, diminished self-worth, complaints of unkempt personal hygiene, feelings of sadness, overall feeling bad and a lack of dignity. Findings include: Observation and interview on 06/24/25 at 1:10 PM Observation with maintenance supervisor F of the 200 hallway shower room revealed there to be no tub or shower in the room. A toilet was noted for use. Storage items noted in the room consisted of three plastic commode chairs, a mechanical lift, a reclining shower chair and dirty linen bins. The maintenance supervisor F stated the tub was removed in March 2025 and they are waiting on quotes for a shower to be built. So only one shower is in use for all 48 residents. (If each resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a dressing change was completed as ordered for one resident (Resident #18) of 2 residents reviewed for skin, resulting in Resident #18 having a lower back post-surgical incision with dressing that was not changed daily as ordered with the likelihood for infection and prolonged illness. Findings include: Resident #18: Observation and interview on 06/24/25 at 09:18 AM with Resident #18 revealed that the resident had a second back surgery and had a dressing /sore on his back. the state surveyor observed mid-line lower back dressing dated 6/22/2025 at 10 AM, initials staff AK. Resident was asked about the dressing changes, and he stated They are supposed to change the dressing every day. the previous day He left around 11:00 AM for a physical therapy home evaluation yesterday. Resident #18 did not leave the facility until 11:00 AM as a planned leave of absences. In an interview on 06/24/25 at 09:25 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) A stated that Resident #18 was gone before she could get to doing her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow care-planned interventions and prevent skin breakdown for one resident (Resident #6) out of three residents reviewed for skin problems, resulting in new skin breakdown with the likelihood of further skin breakdown and pain. Findings include: Resident #6: On 6/24/25, at 8:25 AM, Resident #6 was resting in bed on their back without positioning devices. There was a slight odor to the room. On 06/25/25, at 3:00 PM, an observation of Resident #6's abdomen wound was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). When the DON pulled back Resident #6's covers there was a strong odor. The DON mentioned that the wound was healing well. There were no positioning devices under Resident #6's left arm. On 6/25/25, at 3:15 PM, a record review of Resident #6's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Stroke, Aphasia and Hemiplegia following Stroke. Resident #6 was totally dependent on Staff for all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage for the 200 Hall medication cart of 2 carts reviewed, resulting in the 200 Hall medication cart to be found parked in the middle of the 200 hallway left unlocked and accessible for residents, visitors and state surveyor to access the medications. Findings include: Observation and interview on 06/24/25 at 12:13 PM of the 200 hallway medication cart left in hallway unlocked. The state surveyor was able to open drawers on the med cart. Registered Nurse (RN) A was noted in room [ROOM NUMBER] checking resident blood sugar and chatting with resident. RN A came out of the room and the surveyor was standing at the medication cart with the second drawer open. The state surveyor had to ask the nurse what's going on with the cart being left unlocked in the hallway with visitors, therapy and staff passing by. RN A stated that she didn't mean to leave the cart unlocked. Record review of Registered Nurse (RN) As employee…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide declination documentation and education of immunization refusal for one resident (Resident #28) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations, resulting in the lack of documentation of resident immunization education and declination of vaccines. Findings include: Influenza Vaccine Resident, dated 9/2024, All residents and employees who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza. A resident's refusal of the vaccine shall be documented on the Informed Consent for Influenza Vaccine and placed in the resident's medical record. Pneumococcal Vaccine Policy Statement dated 11/2024, All residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Residents/representatives have the right to refuse vaccination. If refused, appropriate information is documented in the resident's medical record indicating the date of the refusal of the pneumococcal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely responses to call lights, ensure that call lights were within reach and ensure that privacy curtains were within reach and used for seven residents (Resident #1, Resident #4, Resident #20, Resident #36, Resident #38, Resident #39, Resident #244) and five rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]), resulting in unmet care needs, unmet privacy needs and with the likelihood of feelings of anger and hopelessness. Findings include: On 7/15/24, at 08:45 AM, During initial pool task, the following Residents' rooms had their privacy curtains tucked away out of reach: 100, 103, 107, 108 and 110. On 7/15/24, at 8:55 AM, Resident #36 was lying in bed in their gown. Their call light was out of reach sitting on a chair to the left of their bed approximately 4 feet away. Resident #36 was asked if they could reach their call light and Resident #36 stated, well, I guess…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PREFERRED CARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $612K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI