Briarwood Nursing and Rehabilitation
3011 North Center Road, Flint, MI 48506 · For profit - Corporation · 117 certified beds · (810) 736-0600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.3% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.9% | 4.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.7% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.9% | 19.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.1% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.4% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.3% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.5% | 79.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.5% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.6% | 11.7% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.95 | 1.84 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.98 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 208 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 68.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 109 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.8%CMS range 46.3–58.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 7.8–13.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 68.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 69.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 73.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.8–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 100.3 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate skin care to prevent the development and failed to implement adequate interventions to avoid the worsening of unstageable pressure ulcer for one resident (Resident #69) of five sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcer out of a total sample of 18 residents, resulting in the development and worsening of a facility-acquired pressure ulcer resulting in severe pain and suffering, and the potential for infection, delayed wound healing and a deterioration in health status. Findings include: Resident #69 (R69): On 4/17/24 at 10:21 AM, Resident #69 (R69) was observed for wound care. Wound Nurse A and Nurse B were observed to provide wound care for R69. R69 was found lying on his back and his right leg and right heel did not have a pillow or any device to position the heel off the bed. R69's right heel had a protective dressing that was not secure and almost coming off his right heel. While Nurse B attempted to turned R69…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that safe cleaning practices, humidification, dispensation of oxygen and storage of respiratory equipment was maintained. This deficiency affected four residents (R77, R82, R84 and R89) of four residents reviewed for respiratory standards of care. Findings include: Resident 82 (R82): On 6/1/26 at approximately 9:30 AM, an interview was conducted with R82 who answered questions and engaged in conversation. An observation was made of a water bottle for humidification positioned on the concentrator but not connected to the concentrator or tubing that was on the Resident. The bottle was empty and there was not a date on the humidification container. The Resident reported that the oxygen was drying to her nose. A review of R82's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 4/9/25 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. A review of the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Ensure proper storage of medications for Resident #23 and Resident #112; 2) Ensure that medication carts and treatment carts were secured; 3) Ensure that expired medications were disposed of; 4) Ensure that a medication cart was in sanitary condition; and 5) Ensure that medication cart keys, which included narcotic keys, were not shared between nurses, for three of six medication carts, one of three medication storage areas, one treatment cart and one wound care cart reviewed for storage of medications, supplies and narcotics. Findings include: On 6/1/26 at 8:25 AM, an observation was made in the 100-Hall area of a treatment cart positioned in the hallway against the wall. The Treatment Cart was left unlocked and not secured. Staff were going up and down the hall, and there was not any Resident's in the area at this time. The Nurse had been at a medication cart at the end of the hall. The Medication cart was up against the wall with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that menus and/or food preferences were followed for three residents (#12, #13, #84) of three residents reviewed for preferences and nine residents observed during the dining task.Findings include:Resident 84 (R84): A review of Resident 84's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 9/11/19 and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, depression, anxiety disorder, dependence on supplemental oxygen and adult failure to thrive. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 12/15 that indicated moderate cognitive impairment. On 6/1/26 at approximately 9:00 AM, an interview was conducted with R84 who answered questions and engaged in conversation. The Resident was observed with her breakfast tray at her bedside, and the Resident was putting jelly into her oatmeal. The Resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 06/01/2026 at 6:16AM whole milk with a best buy date of 5/28/26 was observed in the walk-in cooler. On 06/01/2026 at 6:17AM lemon flavor thickener with a best buy date of 4/24/26 was observed in the walk-in cooler. According to the 2022 Food Code, 3-501.18 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Disposition, Time/temperature control for safety refrigerated foods must be consumed, sold or discarded by the expiration date.On 06/01/2026 at 6:18AM large chunk of built-up ice accumulation on food storage shelf, was observed in the walk-in freezer.According to the FDA 2022 Food Code, 6-501.12 Cleaning, Frequency and Restrictions, Physical facilities shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean. Except for cleaning that is necessary due to a spill or other accident, cleaning shall be done during periods when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate backflow prevention was installed at plumbing fixtures, resulting in the potential for contamination to the water supply, affecting all residents. Findings include: On 06/03/2026 at 9:10AM the cap to an atmospheric vacuum breaker to the utility sink was observed missing in the supply closet in Station C Hall. On 06/03/2026 at 10:26AM an attached hose with a spray nozzle downstream of a hose bib vacuum breaker on an outside spigot was observed around the corner from the front entrance. During this observation, Maintenance Director S stated there's another hose at the front entrance that is probably set up the same way. On 06/03/2026 at 10:27AM an attached hose with a spray nozzle downstream of a vacuum breaker on outside spigot was observed at the front entrance.According to the State of Michigan's 2008 Cross Connection Manual on atmospheric vacuum breakers, AVBs shall not be installed where they will be under continuous pressure for more than 12 hours (i.e. no downstream shutoff valve).
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess and monitor for potential changes in condition of a hydrocele (fluid-filled sac in the scrotum that causes swelling) for one resident (Resident #97) of one resident reviewed for assessment and monitoring. Findings Include:Resident #97:On 6/1/2026 at 10:30 AM, as Nurse N entered the room to complete vitals and assess Resident #97's roommate, prior to her assessment she observed Resident #97 sitting up on the side of the bed and it appeared he was attempting to get up unassisted. Resident #97 only had on white shirt sleeve T-shirt and a large hydrocele about the size of a melon was observed.On 6/1/2026 at approximately 11:30 AM, a review was conducted of Resident #97's record and it revealed he admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses the included Dementia, Anxiety, Overactive Bladder, Spinal Stenosis, and Hydrocele. Review was conducted of his care plan and Kardex and there was nothing noted regarding monitoring of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the prescribed nutritional formula was consistently available and that the quality was maintained. This failure affected one resident (Resident #106) of one resident reviewed for enteral nutrition standards of care. Findings include: Resident #106 (R106): A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated R106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: hemiplegia (mild to moderate weakness on one side) and hemiparesis (severe to complete paralysis on one side) following cerebral infarction (interrupted blood flow to brain) affecting right dominant side, aphasia (cognitive communication deficient with speech and understanding), dysarthria (motor speech disorder), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes (PEG / delivers nutrition and medications directly into the stomach) placed 05/22/2026, adult failure to thrive, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. The MDS assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the adequate competency and verification of skills for one (1) certified nursing assistant of five (5) certified nursing assistants reviewed for completion of annual 12 contact hours, and the competency/training checklist required by the facility was completed before being taken off the training schedule for resident care.Findings include:On 6/3/26 at 9:22 AM, the employee records of Certified Nursing Assistant TB (CNA TB) were reviewed. CNA TBs employee record revealed that her original hire date was 8/25/25. Her termination date was 11/11/2025. CNA TB was rehired on 1/26/2026 and was verified as currently employed during the state recertification survey from June 1, 2026, to June 3, 2026. The Human Resources (HR) Director stated that she was new in her position as HR, and the Regional HR asked to be present during the interview with the HR staff and the review of 5 CNAs (Certified Nurse Aide) Records. The 2 HR staff agreed that CNA TB did not have a record of the facility completing 12.0 Continuing Education…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, implement and follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for a resident identified with qualifying medical needs for one resident (Resident #106) (R106) of three residents reviewed for infection prevention. Findings include: Resident #106 (R106):A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated R106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: hemiplegia (mild to moderate weakness on one side) and hemiparesis (severe to complete paralysis on one side) following cerebral infarction (interrupted blood flow to brain) affecting right dominant side, aphasia (cognitive communication deficient with speech and understanding), dysarthria (motor speech disorder), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes (PEG / delivers nutrition and medications directly into the stomach), adult failure to thrive, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder with the presence of indwelling urinary catheter. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number 2988534. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care with external care providers for one resident (Resident #701) of three residents reviewed. Findings include:Resident #701:Review of intake documentation revealed a concern that facility staff were provided a medication prescription by Resident #701's orthopedic surgeon for Valium (controlled, antianxiety medication commonly used before surgery to reduce anxiety) on 4/7/26 to take before their scheduled surgery on 4/13/26 but the facility did not administer the medication. Record review revealed Resident #701 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included displaced transcondylar fracture of the right humerus (serious fracture where bones are not aligned near the elbow), periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic left shoulder joint (break in bone around artificial joint), left knee laceration, right shoulder replacement, heart disease, depression,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number 2986995. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to correctly assess the wound status of one resident (Resident #702) upon admission of three residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of timely and comprehensive identification, and the assessment and care of an alteration in skin integrity. Findings include:Resident #702: Review of intake documentation revealed a concern that Resident #702 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with no alterations in skin integrity. The Resident was transferred back to the hospital on 4/15/26 due to a change in condition with skin tears and a black eye. An interview was completed with Family Member Witness A on 5/4/26 at 12:10 PM. When queried regarding Resident #702, Witness A responded that the Resident passed away. When asked, Witness A disclosed Resident #702 went to the facility on 4/11/26 for therapy after having a CVA (stroke) which resulted in their right side being flaccid and aphagia (difficulty speaking). Witness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number 2986995. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, comprehensively assess, and document nutritional/hydration needs and intake for one resident (Resident #702) of three residents reviewed for quality of care resulting, in a lack of identification of risk for dehydration, timely initiation of a Health Care Provider (HCP) ordered diet, documentation of fluid intake, and a decline in health status. Findings include:Resident #702: Review of intake documentation revealed a concern that Resident #702 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred back to the hospital on 4/15/26 due to confusion and a change in condition. An interview was completed with Family Member Witness A on 5/4/26 at 12:10 PM. When queried regarding Resident #702, Witness A responded that the Resident passed away. When asked, Witness A disclosed Resident #702 went to the facility on 4/11/26 for therapy after having a CVA (stroke) which resulted in their right side being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number 2709347. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures for advance care planning for three residents (#701, #704, and #706) of three residents reviewed, resulting in the lack of timely determination of decision-making capacity and arranging appropriate and legal representation for Resident #701 and Resident #706 and the lack of current guardianship documentation for Resident #704.Findings include:Review of intake documentation revealed a concern that Resident #701 is a vulnerable adult who requires total care. Per the intake, Resident #701 was transferred and admitted to the hospital due to an infection from a pressure ulcer (wound caused by pressure) and was in serious condition. The intake specified the Resident had been at the facility for several months and indicated they had been and were currently unable to make their own medical decisions and did not have guardian or POA (Power of Attorney).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number 2709347. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures for the care of pressure ulcers for two residents (#'702 and #703) of three residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of accurate documentation of care and implementation of planned interventions. Findings include:Resident #702: On 1/14/26 at 3:30 PM, Resident #702 was observed laying in bed in their room. The Resident was positioned on their back with their heels directly against the mattress. Heel boots (cushioned, pressure-relieving positioning boots) were observed sitting on a table in the Resident's room. The Resident had one pillow on their bed, under their head. There were no pillows present in the room, including on the floor for positioning use. An interview was completed at this time. When queried if they had any pressure ulcers, Resident #702 replied, Just on my heels. When asked if they had pressure ulcers on both of their heels,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This Citation Pertains to Intake # 2676612.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1) the sink used for hand hygiene in the kitchen maintained a hot water temperature of at least 85 degrees Fahrenheit and 2) the chemical strips used to test the dish machine were not expired, resulting in the potential for the spread of foodborne illness to all Residents receiving meal service from a census of 99 residents.Kitchen hand washing sinkOn 12/5/2025 at 9:00 AM, during a tour of the Kitchen with Dietary Supervisor B, a sink for employee hand hygiene was noted near the entrance to the kitchen from the service hall. Upon use of the hot water, it was identified to be very cold. The Dietary Supervisor B was asked about the hot water being cold, as she was observed performing hand hygiene and she said sometimes it had to run a bit for it to warm up. The hot water was left to run for approximately 1 minute and it was still cold, not warm or hot. The Dietary Supervisor B was asked if the hot water temperature for the sink was monitored and she said she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake# 2678077Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for one resident (#6) of 3 residents reviewed for wound care, resulting in Resident #6 lacking a care plan for a right leg brace. A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: history of right knee replacement and post-surgical right knee infection, reduced circulation right leg, heart disease, and arthritis in knees. The resident had full cognitive abilities and made her own decisions. On 12/4/2025 at 10:00 AM, Resident #6 was observed sitting on the bed in her room, with her right lower leg wrapped in a dressing with a right lower leg brace on. The resident said she had previously had knee surgery, and it became infected. She said she was treated with antibiotics, and her knee was better, but she had other wounds on her right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: (1) Ensure proper cleaning of therapy gym equipment for all residents utilizing the equipment; (2) Ensure the timely removal of Resident #2's soiled gown, blanket and linen , (3) Ensure the timely disposal of daily hygiene products of a discharged resident (Resident #15) and the cleaning of the room prior to admittance of a new resident and (4) Ensure the decluttering of residents' items throughout the rooms on the 100 Hall. Findings Include: Therapy Gym During initial tour a resident shared a peddle on the bike in the therapy room gym, was not safe for residents to utilize and requested it be observed for functionality and safety. On 4/24/2025 at 1:10 PM, an observation was conducted of the facility therapy gym. Therapy Director S provided an overview of the equipment and stated each machine is wiped down between each resident, but deep cleaning is completed by housekeeping. The following was observed: 2- Nu Step Machines: -Foot pedals…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the clinical staff posting was completed and available for review for multiple days from October 2024- April 2025, resulting in the inability of residents and visitors to know what clinical staff were working on those days. Findings Include: FACILITY Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing On 4/24/2025 at 9:17 AM, the Administrator was asked where the posted nurse staffing was located. She said the document was on the wall near the entry to the facility. Upon review of the posted document it said Tuesday, 4/24/2025. The Administrator, viewed the document; discussed with her the dated was correct but the day was wrong. It was not Tuesday; It was Thursday. She said the staff member N responsible for completing the document would correct it. The Administrator said the posted staffing documents were to be posted daily. Requested to review the prior year's posted staffing. The Administrator said Staff N would provide the binder with the documents. The posted nurse staffing binder was reviewed. The posted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) including showers, nail care and hair care for two residents ( #52 and #139), from a sample of 20 residents. Findings Include: Resident #52: Activities of Daily Living On 4/23/2025 at 1:15 PM, Resident #52 was observed lying in bed in her room. She said she had itching on her face and leg and said it was horrible. She said they gave her something for the itching, but the itching would come back frequently. A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: Dementia, depression, anxiety, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, arthritis, blindness right eye and hypothyroidism. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive loss with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 10/15 and the resident was independent with most care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor weights timely for a Resident who had a hospitalization and return with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ) (PEG) tube for feeding for one resident (Resident #62) of two residents reviewed for weight loss. Findings include: Resident #62: A review of Resident #62's medical record revealed the Resident had an admission into the facility on 6/26/24 and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke), gastrostomy, abdominal aortic aneurysm, dysarthria, aphasia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side, Alzheimer's disease, and muscle wasting and atrophy. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed the Resident had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. A review of the medical record revealed the Resident had a change in condition on 3/10/25 and was transferred to the hospital and returned on 3/20/25 with a PEG tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to 1) Monitor a PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) line placement for Resident #8; 2) Monitor antibiotic administration and notify the physician of three missed doses for Resident #289; and 3) Document the clinical rationale for an increase in the Vancomycin dose for Resident #84 for three of four residents reviewed for PICC lines. Findings Include: Resident #84: On 4/23/2024 at approximately 3:35 PM, Resident #84 was observed ambulating down the hallway into her room. She stated she developed osteomyelitis and is here for IV antibiotics. On 4/24/2025 at approximately 9:30 AM, a review was conducted of Resident #84's medical records and it indicated she readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Osteomyelitis, Diabetes, Asthma, Heart Disease and Atrial Fibrillation. Resident #84 is her own person and able to make her needs known to staff. Further review of her record yielded the following: Physician Orders:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Identify a medication order discrepancy and 2) Address the pharmacy monthly medication regimen review timely for one resident (Resident #18) of five residents reviewed for medication regimen review, resulting in a medication ordered with the previous order not discontinued. Findings include: Resident #18: A review of Resident #18's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 6/11/24 with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) atherosclerotic heart disease, atrial fibrillation and presence of coronary angioplasty implant and graft. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed the Resident had intact cognition and needed partial/moderate assistance with eating, oral hygiene, dependent on a helper for other activities of daily living, mobility and transfers. A review of Resident #18's medication orders revealed an order dated 6/11/24, Diltiazem 60 mg (milligrams), take 1 tablet by mouth four times daily. A review of Resident #18's Physician/Practitioner Progress Note dated 2/1/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Obtain a signed consent for treatment with antipsychotic medications for Resident #52 and 2) Prevent the duplication of medications administered to Resident #18. Findings Include: Resident #52: Unnecessary Meds, Psychotropic Meds, and Med Regimen Review A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: Dementia, depression, anxiety, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, arthritis, blindness right eye and hypothyroidism. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive loss with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 10/15 and the resident was independent with most care but needed some assistance and oversight with bathing/showering. A review of the physician orders for Resident #52 revealed the resident received Fluoxetine/Prozac for depression, start date 11/15/2024. A review of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 3 medication carts (Halls 300, 400 and 500) of 4 medication carts observed were maintained clean and sanitized, free of crushed pills, pieces of loose papers and dust in the drawers. Findings Include: Observation of facility medication carts done on 4/23/25 starting at 10:55 a.m., revealed the following: 500 Hall Med Cart: Observation was done on 4/23/25 at approximately 10:40 a.m., accompanied by Nurse, RN B revealed the following: -The second and third drawer's had pieces of crushed medications/meds and paper on the bottom back. During an interview done on 4/23/25 at 10:45 a.m., Nurse B stated Third shift cleans it, but we can all clean it. During an interview done on 4/23/25 at approximately 10:55 a.m., Nurse, LPN C was asked by this surveyor if the drawers of the med cart could have been cleaned better and she stated ya, a bit; third shift cleans it and anyone can clean it. 400 Hall Med Cart: Observation was done on 4/23/25 at 11:09 a.m., accompanied by Nurse, LPN D revealed the following: -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain food preparation and kitchen equipment in a sanitary and good working condition, resulting in an increased likelihood for food borne illnesses with hospitalization, and cross contamination affecting 82 residents who consumed oral nutrition from the facility kitchen and ice machine of a total census of 84 residents. Findings include: Review of the Public Health Service 2009 Food Code, adopted by the Michigan Food Law, effective October 1, 2012, Chapter 4-501.14 directs that equipment cleaning frequency is to be throughout the day at frequency necessary to prevent recontamination of equipment and utensils. On 4/23/25 at 10:15 a.m., a kitchen tour was done accompanied by Dietary Manger A. The following concerns were identified during the walk-through: -At 10:15 a.m., the large can opener was observed to have a dark colored sticky substance directly behind the blade. -At 10:18 a.m., the large counter mixer that was clean and ready for use had dried batter-like substance on the attachment directly over the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00146446. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a complete nursing assessment was done after a condition change (a fall at the facility on 7/2/24) for one resident (Resident #101) of 3 residents reviewed for assessing/monitoring after a change in condition (a decline in therapy due to increased pain), resulting in incomplete nursing and physician documentation, and delayed hospitalization with a CT (Computed Tomography). Findings Include: Resident #101: Review of the Face Sheet, Nurse Practitioner and Nursing and Physician note's dated 7/1/24 through 7/12/24, emergency room and Hospital notes dated 7/12/24 through 7/14/24, care plans dated 6/24, and MDS (nursing assessment tool) dated 7/24, revealed Resident #101 was 67 years-old, alert and able to make his own medical decisions, admitted (last admission) to the facility on 6/27/24, after a fall at home with several fractures and post surgical repair of spine. The resident was a fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1.) Failed to ensure that food products were properly labeled with an Opened and/or Use by date and dispose of expired food items; 2.) Failed to monitor/document temperatures of a refrigerated unit; 3.) Failed to properly wash and dry cookware/bakeware/food containers before stacking/storage; and 4.) Failed to maintain sanitary cooking equipment, resulting in the potential contamination of food, bacterial harborage and the increased potential for food borne illness. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who consume food prepared in the kitchen with a census of 73. Findings include: Initial tour of the Kitchen: On 4/15/24 at 9:27 AM, an initial tour of the facility kitchen was conducted with Dietary Manager L. The following observations were made: -Two knives were found in the knife holder that had debris on them. The Dietary Manager was asked if the items were ready for use and the Dietary Manager indicated they were. -Muffin tins ready for use were found to be oily, had baked on oil residue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #6 Activities of Daily Living Resident #6 (R6) on 04/15/24 02:20 PM, was observed lying on his bed with his wife visiting on the bedside. R6 was observed wearing a white T-shirt that appeared one size larger on him and a gray jogging pants that was too short and too tight for his size. When asked if he felt comfortable, he did not answer. R6 wife explained that R6 is very hard of hearing and may not have heard the question. R6 was observed with beard growth all over his face. The hair growth stood out because it was gray in color, on the R6's jaw, chin, upper lip, lower lip, cheeks and neck. Meanwhile, R6 wife was holding on to a shaving cream and razor. When asked, R6 wife revealed that she and her daughter had been taking turns shaving R6 beard and was not sure if the facility does it or them. She indicated that it seems that they were not doing it so they assumed that it is her and her daughter's responsibility. Resident's family had indicated that they have been shaving the residents all this time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received their mail on Saturdays, resulting in residents not being able to exercise their right to receive mail and access communication. Findings Include: FACILITY On 4/16/24 at 2:30 PM, during an interview with a Confidential Group of Residents, when asked if the residents received Mail on Saturdays, the residents stated, The Mail doesn't run on Saturday. The Mail lady has weekends off. During further discussion, the residents said they did not receive mail on Saturday but did receive mail during the week. On 4/17/24 at 2:32 PM, the Activity Director I was interviewed related to resident mail delivery on Saturday, she said the post office was to deliver it to the front desk receptionist and the receptionist was to put it in the activities mailbox and then the activities aide who works on the weekend delivered it. The Activity Director I said she had worked on the weekend for the last several weeks and didn't recall if there was mail in the Activities mailbox. The Activities Director showed the room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1.) Resident rooms were clean and in good repair and free of chipped paint and broken tiles; 2) Resident lift equipment was clean; and 3.) Wash basins were properly stored and labeled, affecting room numbers #101, 103, 104, 105, 203, 204, 209, and 211, and residents using the sit-to-stand lift, resulting in an unsanitary environment, potential spread of infection, and dissatisfaction with living conditions. Finding include: On 4/15/24 at 11:43 AM, an observation was made of a Sit-to-Stand mechanical lift in the 100-unit hallway. An observation was made of whitish/yellowish debris on the pads where the lower leg rest against when the mechanical lift was in use. An observation was made of the base, where the Resident's feet would be placed, of dirt and debris. On 4/15/24 at 11:57 AM, an observation was made during the initial tour of the facility, of the bathroom between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 103, with two Residents in each room that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly dispose of wasted medications and secure treatment carts that contained prescription treatment medications and medical supplies, resulting in the potential for drug diversion and ingestion of medicated substances. Findings include: On 4/16/24 at 2:42 PM, an observation was made with Unit Manager, Nurse A during a review of concerns in the 100 Hall Unit and 200 Hall Unit. While approaching the 200 Hall Unit with Nurse A an observation was made of the treatment cart in the 200 Hall, unattended by a Nurse. The cart had a drawer that was partially open. Upon observation of the cart, the drawer was able to be pulled open with skin and wound treatments in the drawer. The Unit Manager indicated that the cart should be locked. Upon locking the cart, it was found to be locked but that the drawer was not pushed in all the way, leaving access to that drawer. The Unit Manager closed the drawer and made sure it was then secure. On 4/17/24 at 7:53 AM, an observation was made during medication administration task of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that ongoing surveillance of infectious illnesses for employees was maintained, documented, analyzed and reported, resulting in the potential for a lack of guidance to ensure compliance with infection control standards of practice and exposure to infectious organisms, which could lead to an unidentified outbreak. Findings Include: FACILITY Infection Control On 4/17/24 at 10:20 AM, during a review of the Infection Prevention and Control Program with Infection Preventionist/IP H, he was asked about surveillance for employee illnesses. The IP said the facility had an employee call in log, that identified staff call-ins from work. He said during the morning Interdisciplinary Team Meeting, he would look at the employee call in logs. The IP was asked if he collected the data and analyzed for similar infections during the week or month. He said he looked at the information but did not write anything down. The IP did not have any written data to compare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise care plans with resident changes to ensure interventions necessary for care and services were provided for one resident (Resident #45) reviewed for care plans, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings Include: Resident #45 Activities of Daily Living On 4/15/24 at 12:04 PM, during a tour of the facility a Confidential Resident stated, Resident #45, Never bathes/showers and it makes the room smell. The Confidential Person said they couldn't bring visitors in because of that. On 4/15/2024 at 12:15 PM, Resident #45 was observed lying in bed, awake with soiled clothes with brown stains. The resident appeared disheveled, his hair unwashed and the bed linens were soiled with brown stains. There were papers all over the bed. The resident did not readily answer questions. On 4/16/2024 at 4:20 PM, during an interview with Certified Nurse Aide R about Resident #45, she said she was familiar with this resident, and had taken care of him in the past. Upon entering the resident's room, he was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered per the physician's order for two residents (Resident #53 and Residednt #273) resulting in multiple medication administrations not being documented in the Electronic Health Record (EHR)(Resident #53) and a lidocaine patch not being removed prior to administering another patch(Resident #273) with potential for adverse reactions and skin irritation. Findings include: Resident #53 (R#53): On 04/15/24 at 01:00 PM, R#53''s facesheet was reviewed and revealed that they are [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Pertinent diagnoses on admission include discitis, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, alzheimers, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). On 04/15/24 at 01:03PM, record review revealed a physician's order for Daptomycin(antibiotic) 500mg intravenously (IV) one time a day for endocarditis until 04/24/24. On 04/15/24 at 01:06 PM, record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that proper communication/documentation of Hospice services were provided to one resident (Resident #37) of two residents reviewed for Hospice services, resulting in the lack of receipt of progress notes/assessments to resident medical record with ineffective communication and collaboration of services between the facility and hospice service, lack of residents and staff aware of hospice schedule and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #37: A review of Resident #37 medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 9/11/19 and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, anxiety and dependence on supplemental oxygen. A review of the Resident's MDS revealed a BIMS score of 14/15 that indicated intact cognition and the Resident was independent with self-care. On 4/15/23 at 12:43 PM, Resident #37 was observed sitting on her bed. The Resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PREFERRED CARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRIARWOOD OPCO HOLDING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/2023 |
| GREEN, DOV | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 35% | since 03/15/2023 |
| KLEIN, YONI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 40% | since 03/15/2023 |
| SCHNELL, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 03/15/2023 |
| BRIARWOOD PROPCO HOLDING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| DAVITT, JULIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/23/2023 |
| RUBINFELD, ELI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| PREFERRED CARE AT LANSING MNGT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| ZIGDON & ASSOCIATES PC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| ISHAQUE, ASIF | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $991K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235184. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.