Total Rehab Moorestown

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 1,167 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 84.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 644 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.83 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 123.9 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.16 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.77 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.28 to 0.87 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaints: NJ1875890, 2681814 Based on interviews, review of medical records, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and follow adequate fall prevention interventions on the care plan of a resident (Resident #2) who was at risk for falls. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 2) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following:A review of the admission Record for Resident #2 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to acute on chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure (condition where the heart does not pump blood as well as it should); type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (condition where the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood); muscle weakness; other abnormalities of gait and mobility; need for assistance with personal care; and presence of left artificial hip joint. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — widespread
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure personal privacy was maintained when implementing a video monitoring device and ensured written consent was obtained prior to implementing video monitoring devices inside resident rooms for 2 of 2 units and for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for Resident Rights (Resident #25 and 40). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 04/10/25 at 8:22 AM, the surveyor observed a camera device across from Resident #25 who was awake and in bed. Resident #25 appeared confused and did not engage with the surveyor at that time. On 04/11/25 at 11:49 AM, the surveyor conducted a telephone interview with the Responsible Party (RP) for Resident #25. The surveyor asked the RP if they had placed a camera device in the room and the RP stated, no, the facility placed the camera. On 4/11/25 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record for Resident #25 and did not locate a consent or documentation related to using a camera device in the resident's room. On 04/14/25 at 11:34…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0836 — widespread
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and review of documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure who required Medicaid were admitted to the facility per their SNF/NF (Skilled Nursing Faciality/Nursing Facility) designation with the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid (CMS) and per the New Jersey Department of Health (DOH). The deficient practice affected all residents admitted to the facility and was evidenced by the following: Reference: Certificate of Need approval dated [DATE] and signed by the Acting Deputy Commissioner of the DOH, Health Systems revealed: .Approval of this application is conditioned upon the applicant's compliance with the following: Approval of the relocation of the 120 LTC (Long Term Care) bed .is subject to [company name redacted] satisfying the Medicaid-eligible resident utilization requirement at N.J.A.C. 8:33H-1.15(a) or a higher standard that was imposed in a previous certificate of need approval for the LTC facility being relocated. Application for a Long-Term Care Facility License…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to limit the potential spread of infection by failing to ensure a) appropriate transmission based precautions (TBP) were in place and consistently followed during a Covid-19 outbreak, b) staff consistently utilized Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) appropriately, and c) appropriate hand hygiene was performed and shared medical equipment was appropriately disinfected during the medication administration observation for Resident #40 and Resident #45 and for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for Covid-19 (Resident #8 and # 222). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing on 2 of 2 units and was evidenced by the following: a) On 4/10/25 at 7:40 AM, upon entrance to the facility, the Infection Preventionist Registered Nurse (IPRN) informed the survey team that the facility was currently in an outbreak of COVID-19 and RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus-a virus dangerous to older adults and infants < 6 months of age). During the initial tour on 4/10/25 at 8:40 AM, Surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and documents review it was determined the facility failed to identify the causal factor for falls (including falls with injury) and implement interventions, which included adequate supervision, to prevent further falls for a resident who was moderately cognitively impaired and sustained falls on [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #40) and was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 9:36 AM, the surveyor observed the resident resting in bed and was holding the television (TV) remote. The resident communicated they were hard of hearing and could hear better on left ear and was unable to turn the volume up on the TV. There appeared to be a camera in the resident's room opposite of the bed. On [DATE] at 9:40 AM, the surveyor observed the resident in bed and was calling for help. The resident did not activate the call bell. On [DATE] at 1:00 PM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic and paper medical records…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was stored in a manner to prevent potential urinary tract infections. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with an indwelling urinary catheter (Resident #20), and was evidenced by the following: On 4/10/25 at 8:55 AM, the surveyor entered the room and observed Resident #20 in bed. The resident had a Foley catheter (medical device that helps drain urine from the bladder) drainage bag was resting directly on the floor. On 4/10/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor exited the room and asked a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) in the hallway to assist with an observation of Resident #20. The surveyor along with the CNA, Director of Nursing (DON) put on personal protective equipment (PPE) and entered the room. The surveyor observed the CNA then checked the resident's incontinence brief, and the resident had a dressing to the right leg amputated area that was connected to a wound vac (vacuum assisted wound drainage that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the daily posting of licensed nurses, certified nursing aide staffing, and the resident census for 2 of 6 observations This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/15/25 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor observed a Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report (NHRCSR) which was posted on the wall, in the reception area of the lobby. The NHRCSR posted for day shift from 7:00 AM through 7:00 PM and night shift 7:00 PM through 7:00 AM were dated 4/13/25. There was no NHRSCR posted for 4/15/25 day shift 7:00 AM through 7:00 PM. On 4/15/25 at 12:01 PM, during an interview with the surveyor, the receptionist stated the Staffing Coordinator (SC) was responsible for posting NHRCSR daily. The receptionist was not able to tell at what time the SC would post the NHRCSR. On 4/16/25 at 8:00 AM, the surveyor observed the NHRCSR posted in the lobby. The NHRCSR posted for day shift was dated 4/15/25 from 7:00 AM through 7:00 PM. There was no NHRSCR posted for either…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a medication was administered according to physician orders and acceptable standards of practice in accordance with the New Jersey Board of Nursing. This deficient practice was identified in one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #40) observed during the medication observation pass. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label, store, and dispose of medications in three (3) of eight (8) medication carts inspected. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 11:00 AM, the surveyor inspected the 3 D high-side medication cart in the presence of a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1). The surveyor observed an opened Heparin multi-dose vial that had no opened date and an unopened vial of Lantus insulin that was not dated and was stored in the medication cart. At that time, the surveyor interviewed LPN#1 who acknowledge that an opened vial of multi-dose Heparin should have been dated after opening and an unopened vial of Lantus insulin should have been stored in the refrigerator. On [DATE] at 11:15 AM, the surveyor inspected the 3 D low-side medication cart in the presence of LPN#2. The surveyor observed an unopened vial of Arexvy (vaccine for RSV) that was stored in the medication cart, a vial of Humulin R…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #222) with a history of aspiration (inhaling food and liquids into the lungs) without a sensory response (reaction to a stimuli) and who was at risk for aspiration, received the appropriate physician ordered nectar thickened liquids (liquid thickened with an agent for a nectar-like consistency) and b.) ensure special dietary instructions of no straws were followed according to Resident # 171's treatment plan. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for food (Resident #171 and Resident #222), and was evidenced by the following:1. During the initial tour conducted on 4/10/25 at 8:40 AM, the surveyor observed the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) remove a tray from the meal cart and pour thin liquid coffee. CNA #1 then placed the mug on that meal tray, that also contained a container of nectar thickened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$25,090 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $25,090 — penalty dated 2025-04-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PREFERRED CARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ