Avista Nursing and Rehabilitation
2901 Galaxy Drive, Saginaw, MI 48601 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 96 certified beds · (989) 777-5110 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.5% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.5% | 4.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 3.0% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.8% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.2% | 19.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.3% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.8% | 14.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.9% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.7% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.12 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.10 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 75.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 61% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.4%CMS range 37.0–58.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.7–12.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 75.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 75.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 4.0–12.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 86.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include:On 06/22/2026 at 9:15AM during the initial kitchen tour, the drain line to ice machine was observed sitting directly inside the drain. On 06/22/2026 at 9:18AM the cap to the atmospheric vacuum breaker was observed partially unscrewed and loose on the water line to the garbage disposal. On 06/22/2026 at 9:26AM an attached hose with a chemical feeder downstream of an atmospheric vacuum breaker was observed at the utility sink in the kitchen. During this observation, Dietary Manager BB stated she was familiar with wasting [NAME] and knew that the utility sink needed one. On 06/22/2026 at 11:42AM during lunch observation, diced tomatoes stored behind the steam table in the kitchen were temped using a thermometer probe at 51 F. During this observation, Dietary Manager BB…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to 1) Ensure that hand hygiene was practiced between residents while serving food in the dining room, 2) Ensure the sanitary handling of clean food plates during transporting from the kitchen to the dining room, 3) Ensure urinary catheters for 2 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) were not on the floor, 4) Ensure that the multi-use shower bed was cleaned and sanitized between residents' use, 5) Ensure that contact precautions were followed for 1 resident (Resident #94), 6) Ensure that a barrier was used and sanitation was done with use of a Glucometer for one resident (Resident #50), and 7) Ensure that appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn during care for 1 resident (Resident #2) of 32 residents reviewed for infection control practices. Findings Include: Resident #3: On 6/22/26 at 11:55 AM, a Contact Precaution Isolation Sign was present on the outside of Resident #3's room door. The Resident was not present in their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary shower room for 1 of 2 shower rooms and that shower curtains were maintained without holes. Findings include: Observation done on 6/23/26 at 5:00 p.m., of the main shower room revealed the following: -The blue shower mat on top of the white shower bed had an excessive amount of dirt, old, dried skin, and debris on top, on sides and underneath.-There were 2 large holes in the top of the shower curtain.-The floor had papers and dirt on it; the corners were very dusty.-There was a area on the inside of the main door of a dried white substance. Observation done on 6/24/26 at 9:12 a.m., accompanied by Housekeeping Supervisor AA, revealed the following: -The blue shower mat on top of the shower bed was still full of dead skin, dirt-like and debris; no one had cleaned it.-The floor was dirty with dirt and papers, and also a soiled purple medical glove was on the floor by the toilet.-The inside door still had the white dried drippings on it. During an interview done on 6/24/26 at 9:37 a.m., Housekeeping Supervisor AA stated The CNA is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated in a respectful and dignified manner for 12 residents (#2, #3, #6, #7, #9, #10, #13, #17, #30, #46, #50 and #69) of 12 residents reviewed, resulting in call lights not being in reach, residents wandering and sleeping in other residents' beds, lack of timely assistance with care, uncovered urinary catheter drainage bags, and Resident #6 being told to urinate in their brief. Findings include: Resident #6: On 6/22/26 at 10:20 AM, Resident #6 was not in their room. A strong, foul urine odor was present in their room. An interview was completed with Resident #6 on 6/22/26 at 12:05 PM. The Resident was in their room in bed, and the strong urine odor remained. Resident #6 was pleasantly confused and smiled but did not respond to all questions asked. Review of Resident #6's face sheet revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the results of the most recent federal or state survey were kept in an area that was readily accessible for review to residents, family members and resident representatives for a confidential group of residents reviewed.Findings include: On 06/23/2026 at 1:33 PM, during an interview with a confidential group of residents, seven of seven residents reported that they did not have access to the state survey results for the facility and were unaware of how to gain access to the information. On 06/23/2026 at 2:35 PM, during an interview with CNA O who worked at the front reception desk was queried where the survey results were kept CNA O said she was unsure and needed to ask the DON for assistance. On 06/23/2026 at 2:37 PM, during an interview with the DON she was asked to locate the last survey results that is for the residents and family to review. The DON said she was not sure and that she thought it was in the NHA's office and needed to ask. After the DON texted an unknown staff member, she said the binder was at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse was on duty for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, resulting in the potential for inadequate coordination of routine or emergent care. Findings Include: Staffing: A record review of the daily posted nurse staffing data sheets from June 2025 to June 2026 indicated there were 15 days with documented 0 for Total Number of Staff and Total Scheduled Hours for RN/Registered Nurse hours: 9/15/2025, 10/8/2025, 12/30/2025, 3/16/2026, 4/10/2026, 4/20/2026, 4/21/2026, 4/26/2026, 5/20/2026, 6/2/2026, 6/5/2026, 6/6/2026, 6/7/2026, 6/20/2026, and 6/21/2026. Upon further review of the Nursing Hours posted document, the facility did not identify 8 hours of RN coverage in a 24 hour period for the identified days. The resident Census for the identified days ranged from 81- 90. On each days document, LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse hours were listed, but each RN hour said 0. On 5/20/2026 there were no RN's listed and 2 LPN's listed on the 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift for a census of 82 residents. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Ensure that medications were secured, including a pill on the floor for Resident #79 and that opened medications were properly labeled and dated, and 2) Maintain medication and treatment carts in a clean and sanitary condition, identified for two of four medication carts and two of four treatment carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: Medication Storage and Labeling: A record review of the electronic medical record indicated Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Hypertension, hypothyroidism, arthritis, and bipolar disorder. On [DATE] at 11:06 AM, during a tour of the facility a small round white pill was found on the floor of Resident #79's room. The pill was located on the floor near the bed wheel at the foot of the bed; a clear medication cup was also on the floor nearby. On [DATE] at 11:15 AM, Nurse DD came into the room and was asked about the white pill lying on the floor by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Provide and document education on vaccine side effects for influenza (flu) and pneumovax (pneumonia) immunizations, and 2) Provide current vaccine education sheets for 4 residents (Resident'#2, Resident #9, Resident #10 and Resident #94) of 4 residents reviewed for vaccine education, resulting in misinformation and lack of full disclosure regarding influenza and pneumovax vaccines. Findings Include:Resident Vaccine Consent Review: Resident #2: Review of facility Electronic Medical Record/EMR revealed, Resident #2 was [AGE] years old, alert and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #2's facility Vaccine Consent dated 6/16/26 (after re-admitted from hospital), revealed no documentation of education regarding Influenza or Pneumococcal side effects, with documentation stating I have been offered or received the Michigan Department of Health & Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vaccine Information Sheets.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Provide and document education on vaccine side effects for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) immunization, and 2) Provide current COVID-19 vaccine education sheet for 4 residents (Resident #2, Resident #9, Resident #10 and Resident #94) of 4 residents reviewed for vaccine education, resulting in misinformation and a lack of full disclosure regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. Findings Include:Resident COVID-19 Vaccine Consent Review: Resident #2: Review of facility Electronic Medical Record/EMR revealed, Resident #2 was [AGE] years old, alert and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #2's facility Vaccine Consent dated 6/16/26, revealed no documentation of education for Coronavirus Disease/COVID-19 side effects, with documentation stating I have been offered or received the Michigan Department of Health & Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vaccine Information Sheet. Review of the facilities current Healthcare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that accurate and comprehensive informed consent was provided prior to initiation of psychotropic medications for one resident (Resident #12) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include:Resident #12: Record review revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizophrenia, psychosis, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required supervision to maximum assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) with the exception of eating. The MDS further detailed the Resident was taking psychotropic medications. Review of Resident #12's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for June 2026 revealed the Resident was currently receiving the following psychotropic medications: - Fluphenazine Decanoate (Prolixin- long lasting antipsychotic medication with a black box warning for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Ensure the resident's right to formulate an Advanced Directive for one resident (Resident #3) and 2) Ensure that a resident was competent to sign an advance directive/Code Status for one resident (Resident #43), of 3 reviewed for Advance Directives, resulting in the potential for the residents' lack of informed knowledge related to options for code status and miscommunication of code status. Findings Include: Resident #3: Record review revealed Resident #3 was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellites, chronic respiratory failure, bipolar disorder, anxiety, chronic kidney disease (CKD), Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS- rare genetic disorder characterized by obesity, kidney abnormalities, and vision loss), and urinary retention. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was cognitively intact and required moderate assistance with toileting and bathing. A review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for one resident (Resident #43) of 23 residents reviewed, resulting in Resident #43 lacking Care Plan interventions related to wandering into other residents' rooms. Findings Include: Resident #43: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS indicated Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: History of a stroke, history of a myocardial infarction (heart attack), weakness right lower leg, diabetes, liver disease, history of liver transplant, lung disease, dementia, depression, anxiety, chronic kidney disease, and gout. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive loss with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 8/15, and the resident needed some assistance with care. On 6/22/2026 at 1:55 PM, Resident #43 was observed lying in another residents' bed (Resident #7) across the hall from Resident #43's room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to provide adequate supervision, and develop, enact and evaluate interventions for repeated wandering into other residents' rooms for one resident (Resident #43). Findings include: Resident #43: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS indicated Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: History of a stroke, history of a myocardial infarction (heart attack), weakness right lower leg, diabetes, liver disease, history of liver transplant, lung disease, dementia, depression, anxiety, chronic kidney disease, and gout. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive loss with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 8/15, and the resident needed some assistance with care. On 6/22/2026 at 1:55 PM, Resident #43 was observed lying in another resident's bed (Resident #7) in the wrong room (across the hall from Resident #43's room). Resident #7 was very upset when he found Resident #43 lying in his bed. He told Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that nurses completed yearly competencies and training for one nurse (Nurse A) of 1 nurse reviewed for education and competencies. Findings Include: On 06/25/2026 at 9:30 AM, Regional Human Resources/HR Director T was interviewed about staff education. She said the completed education documents were stored in the staff files in the HR office. A yearly competency was requested to be reviewed for Nurse A. On 6/25/2026 at 11:29 AM, the HR Director T was interviewed, and she said she did not have a competency evaluation for Nurse A. A review of the Facility Assessment dated March 2026 identified the following: Training, Competencies- Annual and on hire, in person and Show me. On 6/25/2026 at 2:40 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the absence of a competency for Nurse A and said the staff were looking into it.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure clinical staff postings were accurately completed for several days in 2025 and 2026, resulting in several missed days and incomplete documents. Findings Include: On 6/24/2026 at 10:20 AM, the Director of Nursing was interviewed and staffing documents were requested. She said the facility Scheduler kept the documents in her office. A record review of the daily posted nurse staffing data sheets from June 2025 to June 2026 indicated there were several days that the documents were missing: 5/21/2026 and 6/16/2026. In addition, there were 2 documents for 5/29/2026 and none for 5/30/2026. There was also a staffing document dated January but did not include a day or year. There were several days with missing information on the form including 12/30/2025; the RN Total Scheduled Hours for the 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM shift was blank and the RN hours Actual Hours Worked was blank. The Total Number of Staff for RNs was listed as 0. On 6/25/2026 at 2:20 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the daily posted nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the drug/medication regimen reviews were completed, dated and in the medical record monthly, for 3 residents (Resident #8, Resident #12 and Resident #84) of five residents reviewed for medications, resulting in the potential for each resident to receive unnecessary medications and develop adverse effects. Findings Include: Medication Regimen Review Resident #8: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Dementia, Pulmonary hypertension, diabetes, history of falls, back pain, history of a stroke, auditory hallucinations, depression, peripheral vascular disease, cataracts, and hypertension. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] had moderate cognitive loss with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 9/15 and the resident needed some assistance with care. On 6/23/2026 at 2:38 PM, a review of the electronic medical record/emr identified a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the communication process was implemented, and documentation was readily available reflecting coordination of a resident's care, for one resident (Resident #13) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. Findings include:Resident #13 (R13):A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF / decreased ability of heart to pump blood), atherosclerotic heart disease (ASHD / hardening of arteries), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD/ progressive lung disease), diabetes mellitus (DM), stage 2 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and history of falls. A record review of Orders revealed R13 was admitted to hospice services on 05/11/2026. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15. On 06/22/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 4 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), reviewed for the mandatory 12 hours of yearly training, had the required training. Findings Include: On 06/25/2026 at 9:30 AM, Regional Human Resources/HR Director T was interviewed about staff education. She said the completed education documents were stored in the staff files in the HR office and the 12 hour Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA training was able to be downloaded from the training cite on the computer. At that time the HR Director T was asked to see the 12 hour CNA training for 4 CNA's I, V, X, and Y. The HR Director was not able to locate the proof of training. On 6/25/2026 at 11:29 AM, the HR Director T was interviewed and she provided several pages of training documents for CNA X equaling 10.91 hours. She also provided 75 minutes/1 hour 15 minutes of training for CNA I. She said there was no additional training for CNA's Y and V and that was all of the information she could locate. Only CNA X had training on Abuse Neglect and Dementia Care. On 6/25/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to follow and update timely a fall care plan for one resident (Resident #101) resulting in missed interventions necessary for care and services not being care planned with a likelihood of unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #101:Record review of Resident #101's fall incident report dated 4/2/2026 at 6:00AM revealed that the aide requested nursing assistance in the weight room across from the therapy office. Upon arrival the writer noticed resident alert and oriented laying up against the wall in the weight room. Aide reported resident lost his footing on the weight scale as resident was assisted back to his wheelchair. Aide stated resident did not (hit) his head. This writer assessed resident for bruising & injuries, none noted. Resident reported he lost his step on his weaker side as the aide was assisting him back in his wheelchair. There was no mention of resident footwear at the time of the incident. Incident report noted no witness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall/accident and ensure that a left foot Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) device and gait belt were applied prior to standing for one resident (Resident #101) of 4 sampled residents, resulting a fall with likelihood for repeat falls, pain and serious injury. Findings include: Resident #101:Record review of Resident #101's fall incident report dated 4/2/2026 at 6:00AM revealed that the aide requested nurse assistance in the weight room across from the therapy office. Upon arrival the writer (Nurse) noticed resident #101 was alert and oriented laying up against the wall in the weight room. Aide reported resident lost his footing on the weight scale as resident was assisted back to his wheelchair. Aide stated resident did not (hit) his head. This writer assessed resident for bruising & injuries, none noted. Resident reported he lost his step on his weaker side as the aide was assisting him back in his wheelchair. There was no mention of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to 1). Maintain food service equipment (steam table lids, food trays, plate warmers and refrigerator, 2) Ensure kitchen cookware was sanitary and dry; and 3). Maintain the walk- in freezer to be free of ice/snow buildup, resulting in an increased potential for cross-contamination and foodborne illness for all residents who consume meals from the kitchen. Findings include: On 5/13/2025 at approximately 10:00 AM, a kitchen tour was completed in the presence of Dietary Manager Q and the following was observed: Refrigerator: - At the bottom corner of right door, the seal was observed to be ripped/flapping. - There were crumbled food particles in the bottom right-side corner of the door. - The outside bottom of the refrigerator had streaks/smears and Manager Q explained when they attempted to wipe it off it would not come off. A dampened towel was requested and upon wiping the soiled area the streak marks were easily removed. Trays/Plate Warmer: - Seven trays (located next to the juice machine) were jagged on the edge.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and discard medications for 4 of 4 medication carts reviewed, resulting in a lack of dating of multi-dose medications, opened and undated medications, and the potential for residents to receive medications with altered efficiency. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Storage of Medications' policy dated 8/2024, revealed medications and biological's are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacture's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Section III: Expiration dating- 3. Certain medications or package types, such as IV solutions, multiple dose injectable vials, ophthalmic . blood sugar testing solutions and strips require an expiration date shorter than the manufacture's expiration date once opened to ensure medication purity and potency. Observation and interview on 05/13/25 at 09:22 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) D of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Ensure that one resident's (Resident #38), who was on isolation precautions, room was free of soiled linen, 2) Ensure two residents (Residents #15, Resident #64) of 2 residents observed for wound care were free of cross-contamination, and 3) Ensure that kitchen staff wore hair nets properly (covering all hair) and that no artificial finger nails were allowed on kitchen staff while preparing foods, resulting in the potential for cross contamination, resident illness, and increased risk for infection during wound care. Findings Include: During the initial tour of the facility kitchen, Dietary Manager Q was had a hair net on, however on the right and left side of her face were long tendrils of hair that were not covered by the hair net. Dietary Manger Q also had long artificial nails at the time. During an interview done on 5/13/25 at 10:00 a.m., Dietary Manager Q stated I just got my hair done; no we are not supposed to have fake nails.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor and document wound care timely for two residents (Resident #46, Resident #337) of three residents reviewed for wound care, resulting in missed treatments with the likelihood of worsening wounds. Findings include: Resident #337: On 5/13/25, at 9:30 AM, Resident #337 was in their room. They had an occlusive dressing over their left elbow that was dated 5-8. CNA S entered the room and was asked what date they read on the elbow dressing and CNA S stated, it says 5/8. On 5/13/25, at 11:35 AM, a record review of Resident #337 electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Aphasia, Hypertension and Stroke. Resident #337 required assistance with Activities of Daily Living. A review of Treatment Administration Record 5/1/2025 - 5/31/2025 revealed cleanse left antecubital skin tear with wound cleanser pat dry apply nonstick dressing wrap with kerlix daily and prn until healed one time a day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Implement one resident's (Resident #17) preventive pressure ulcer measure (air mattress), and 2) Prevent an erosion to the penis area for one resident (Resident #74) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the potential for pressure ulcer development, increased discomfort and pain with hospitalization. Findings include: Resident #74: During an observation and interview on 05/15/25 at 09:11 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B went to Resident #74's room with the state surveyor for a penal erosion observation and measurements. In catheter observations the Resident #74 had on a regular catheter bag today left over from last night. Urinary catheter with secure device noted to be taunt from penis head to left thigh. Resident #74 had the large overnight catheter bag run down the left leg and it crossed to the right pant leg at the bottom of the pants. LPN B walked into the room and applied gown and gloves; no hand sanitizer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #24) trapeze (bed mobility device) was within reach out of five residents reviewed for assistive devices. Findings Include: Resident #24: On 5/13/2025 at approximately 2:20 PM, Resident #24 was laying in bed and her trapeze was not hanging in a place that was accessible to her as it was flipped over the stabilization bar its connected too. Resident #24 was asked if she was able to reach the trapeze and she stated she was unable to and attempted to reach for it but was unable to access it. On 5/14/2025 at 10:55 AM, Resident #24 was observed sleeping peacefully in bed. Her trapeze was not accessible to the resident as it was flipped over the bar. On 5/14/2025 at approximately 11:30 AM, a review was conducted of Resident#24's records and it revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses the included, Diabetes, Dementia, Atrial Fibrillation and Hypertension. Further review yielded the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #25) of 2 residents observed had their dry nebulizer mask stored in a storage bag when not in use, resulting in the potential for cross contamination with respiratory infection, and increased antibiotic usage. Findings Include: Resident #25: Review of the Face Sheet, care plans dated 2/25 through 4/25, orders and electronic medication admission record/EMAR dated 4/25 and 5/25, revealed Resident #25 was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], alert with a Guardian in place, and required staff assistance with all Activities of Daily Living. The residents' diagnosis included, chronic heart and lung disease, Alzheimer's Disease, weakness, acute on chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, Myocardial Infarction, Anxiety Disorder, Adjustment Disorder, Depression, and cerebral aneurysm. Review of the residents' Physician orders dated 2/25, stated Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Nebulization Solution…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain cold holding refrigeration temperatures of potentially hazardous food in the kitchen resulting in an increased potential for foodborne illness, potentially affecting the facility's total census of 79 residents who receive meal services. Findings include: On 6/4/24 at 11:47 AM, while observing lunch being plated from the kitchen's steam table, the surveyor observed the two door reach-in cooler located between the juice and coffee stations with both doors in the fully opened position. At this time the surveyor inquired with Dietary Manager, staff E, on if this was a normal practice during meal service to which they replied, yes. On 6/4/24 at 1:10 PM, upon review of the contents in the two door reach-in cooler the surveyor asked staff E, if they could take a temperature of the remaining portion of milk from the days lunch service to which they stated, of course. On 6/4/24 at 1:12 PM, temperature verification from staff E's thermometer probe revealed a temperature of 55 degrees F. At this time the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon grievances reported in Resident Council meetings and provide responses to grievances as reported during Resident Council with the potential to affect all residents that attend the council meetings, resulting in, unresolved resident concerns and a decreased quality of life. Findings Include: During Resident Council on June 4,2024 at 3:30 PM, the four residents in attendance were asked if their concerns voiced in the meetings were followed up on and resolution/update provided at the next scheduled meeting. The attendees reported staff will ask generalized questions regarding if their issues have been resolved but there is no other discussion past issues or how the facility will resolve them. On 6/5/2024 at approximately 9:00 AM, a review was completed of Resident Council Notes from June 2023 to May 2024. While residents voice their concerns in resident council the notes did not specify the issues with that specific discipline. Furthermore, there was not a response documented to the residents' concerns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI000144366. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to that ensure residents' food choices were honored, food was palatable (with temperature maintained), and an adequate amount of food was offered to one resident (Resident #47), and 4 of 4 residents in the Resident Council Meeting on 06/04/24 at 3:20 PM, resulting in anger, frustration and verbalizations of being hungry. Findings Include: Observation done on 6/3/24 at the noon meal revealed chili, a salad and beverages were served in the main dining room. The facility menu dated 6/3/24, revealed lunch was to include Texas toast. The resident's were not offered any toast, bread nor crackers to go with the chili. During an interview done on 6/3/24 at 1:50 p.m., Dietary Manager E stated (food company name given) makes our menu's; we follow the menu. They (resident's) didn't have bread or crackers today, it wasn't on the menu. The cook must of overlooked the toast today (Texas toast). We are getting tablets to take resident's orders. The Dietary Aide or the Aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessment and documentation of incompetency prior to enacting a Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) and accurate documentation of advance directive forms for one resident (Resident #28) of two residents reviewed for Advance Directives, resulting in DPOA enactment prior to incompetency determination, medical decisions being made for the resident without legal documentation of determination of incompetency, including consent for psychoactive medications and the likelihood for the resident's care wishes to not be followed. Findings include: Resident #28: Record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia with behavioral disturbance, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), osteoporosis, failure to thrive, and difficulty walking. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision to maximum assistance to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that hygiene care was provided to two residents (Resident #23 and Resident #28) of four residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of comprehensive documentation and provision of daily care, long, visible facial hair on a female resident, and the likelihood for feelings of psychosocial distress utilizing the reasonable person concept. Findings include: Resident #28: On 6/3/24 at 1:40 PM, Resident #28 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room with a food tray in front of them on an overbed table. The Resident was female and had multiple, visible, thick colored hairs on their chin. An interview was attempted to be completed at this time. When spoke to, Resident #28 was pleasantly confused and did not consistently provide appropriate responses to questions when asked. Record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia with behavioral disturbance, dysphagia (difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize a comprehensive Restorative Nursing program to ensure appropriate assessment, services, and treatment to maintain or improve Range of Motion (ROM) for two residents (Resident #36 and Resident #44) of two residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of ongoing and accurate assessment and documentation of Range of Motion (ROM) and contractures, a lack of implementation of Restorative Nursing services and residents with known contractures and limitations in ROM, and the likelihood for further decline in ROM, functional decline, and avoidable pain. Findings include: Resident #36: On 6/3/24 at 11:05 AM, Resident #36 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room. The Resident's right arm was bent at the elbow with their hand in a fist. Their arm was bent upwards and positioned against their chest. The wheelchair had one leg rest on the right side and the Resident's right foot was positioned on the leg rest. Their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure adequate staff training, equipment monitoring, prevention, reporting, investigation, and a thorough analysis of accidents for one resident (Resident #44) of four residents reviewed for falls, resulting in a lack of reporting, thorough investigation, comprehensive procedures to prevent accidents, Resident #44 experiencing a fractured tibia and fibula bones (both bones in lower leg) necessitating emergency medical treatment, unnecessary pain, and the likelihood for decline in overall functioning and health status. Findings include: Resident #44: On 6/3/24 at 10:19 AM, Resident #44 was not in their room. A raised edge mattress was present on the Resident's bed and multiple splints/braces were observed on top of the Resident's closet. Record review revealed Resident #44 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessment, maintenance and care of an indwelling urinary catheter, per professional standards of practice, for one resident (Resident #39), and failed to complete treatment of a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for one resident (Resident#18) of four residents reviewed, resulting in an indwelling urinary catheter being maintained in an unsanitary manner, a lack of a urinary catheter securement device, delayed, and incomplete antibiotic therapy with the likelihood of ongoing UTI's with continued and increased Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO- infections caused by microorganisms that are resistant to treatment), difficulty in treatment, and a decline in overall health. Resident #18: On 6/04/24, at 9:19 AM, During infection control task, the line listings were reviewed which revealed Resident #18 had been treated for a urinary tract infection (UTI) on 4/24/2024. On 6/4/2024, at 1:30 PM, a record review of Resident #18's electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC line - catheter inserted in the body through the arm that extends to the heart and is utilized for long term administration of intravenous [IV] medications) care was provided, per professional standards of practice and health care provider's order, for one resident (Resident #37) of one resident reviewed, resulting in a lack of dressing change completion, a lack of sterile technique during dressing change, resident verbalizations of concerns related to a lack of care, and the likelihood for infection and alteration in overall health status. Findings include: Resident #37: On 6/3/24 at 11:04 AM, Resident #37 was observed in their room, laying in bed. An IV pole with an empty bag of Meropenem (IV antibiotic medication) was present in the room. The medication bag was labeled for administration to Resident #37 but did not include the date/time the medication was hung and the IV tubing was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PREFERRED CARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GREEN, DOV | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 30% | since 01/31/2017 |
| KLEIN, YONI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 01/31/2017 |
| SCHNELL, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 45% | since 01/31/2017 |
| SAGINAW REALTY HOLDINGS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2017 |
| RUBINFELD, ELI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2017 |
| STRYKER, AMANDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/28/2017 |
| P&M HOLDING GROUP LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2017 |
| PREFERRED CARE AT LANSING MNGT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2017 |
| ZIGDON & ASSOCIATES PC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| KHAN, MUHAMMAD | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $815K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 235139. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.