No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Manchester Rehab And Healthcare Center

312 Solley Drive, Ballwin, MO 63021 · For profit - Corporation · 137 certified beds · (636) 391-0666 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0607, F0609) — most recent May 2025Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$197,132 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $197,132 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-23)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
510 Baxter Rd Ste 10N · (636) 492-1323 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
421 Lafayette Center · (636) 591-0600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.2 mi
14654 Manchester Rd · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
443 Hawthorne St · (636) 391-0600 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
567 St Joseph Ln · (636) 227-5247

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.0%18.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.1%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms67.7%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.8%17.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.8%25.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.3%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.1%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.0%17.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.3%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.0%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine26.2%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission35.9%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.5%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.062.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.002.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
22.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 22.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 8.1–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge22.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge16.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge19.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 5.2–14.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.271.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
0.47
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.36
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 137 beds and averages 86.9 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-23)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident received adequate supervision and interventions to ensure their safety. Resident #131 admitted on [DATE] from the hospital with altered mental status suspecting underlying dementia with psych issue, and in need of a secure unit. On 4/11/25, the resident left through an alarmed exit door on the secured memory care unit. The alarm sounded on the exit door, however, staff did not visually verify the location of residents on the unit. On 4/19/25, Resident #131 smashed a window with a toilet tank lid, cried and said he/she wanted to leave and threatened to jump out the window. He/She was hospitalized for two days and returned on 4/21/25 with a diagnosis of severe urinary tract infection (UTI). When the resident returned, he/she was suppose to be on enhanced visual monitoring or 1:1 monitoring, neither of which were communicated to staff, and staff did not provide increased supervision. On 4/24/25 at approximately 5:45 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be safe during a transfer when a staff member transferred the resident without a using a Hoyer lift (a mechanical device to assist with transferring) and/or without additional staff assistance, and against the facility's policy, which resulted in the resident sustaining a fractured leg (Resident #20). The facility also failed to ensure all nursing staff had access to residents' electronic medical records through Point Click Care (PCC) prior to working with residents. This prevented staff from having access to care plans and/or Kardex (filing system used as a quick reference for staff) information. The facility failed to inservice staff and update care plans with the most current information regarding resident care needs. The facility also failed to prevent a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #19) from exiting through a secured door without staff knowledge and leaving the facility property. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, homelike environment by failing to ensure residents and staff had access to clean towels for three sampled residents (Resident #34, #36 and #58). Staff also failed to ensure one resident's broken window was fixed (Resident #15), failed to ensure three resident's personal refrigerators had completed temperature logs (Resident #4, #8 and #23) and failed to maintain the hot water at the minimum required temperature of 105 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for three residents (Resident #36, #23 and #55). In addition, staff failed keep the hallway on the Memory Care Unit free from trash. The sample was 19. The census was 74. Review of the facility's housekeeping policy, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To ensure the Facility is clean, sanitary, and in good repair at all times so as to promote the health and safety of residents, staff, and visitors; -Policy: All rooms of the facility are kept clean and as free as possible of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete criminal background checks in accordance with their policy on newly hired or transferred employees, prior to the employee's start date, and failed to ensure the employees were screened to rule out the presence of a Federal Indicator through the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry, for three of 10 employees hired since the last survey. In addition, the facility's policy for screening new hires failed to include completion of checking the NA Registry. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program policy, revised 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To ensure the facility establishes, operationalizes, and maintains an Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program designed to screen and train employees, protect residents, and to ensure a standardized methodology for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, and crime in accordance with federal and state requirements; -Procedure: --Screening: -The facility does not knowingly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs- bathing, dressing and toileting) received necessary services to maintain adequate personal hygiene when staff left three residents soiled for an extended period (Resident's #67, #65 and #17). The facility staff did not provide showers to two residents (Resident #17 and Resident #29). The sample size was 19. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Care and Services policy, revised 10/22/24, showed: -Residents are provided with the necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and social well-being level of an environment that enhances quality of life in the scope of a long-term facility; -Care and Services are provided in a manner that consistently enhances self-esteem and worth. Review of the facility's Showering a Resident policy, revised 10/24/22, showed: -A shower or bath is given to the residents to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and solutions kept in the facility's medication rooms and on medication carts were not expired. In addition, the facility failed to ensure temperature logs in the facility's medication rooms were completed. The sample was 19. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy, revised April 2007, showed: -Drugs and biologicals shall be stored in the packaging, containers, or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers; -The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage AND preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner; -The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed; -Drugs shall be stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, carts, or automatic dispensing systems. Each resident's medications shall be assigned to an individual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable, safe and appetizing temperature during tray service by failing to maintain the temperature of hot food at least at 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This affected five of 19 sampled residents (Residents #17, #36, #38, #50 and #55). The census was 74. Review of the facility's food temperature policy, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Policy: foods prepared and served in the facility will be served at proper temperatures to ensure food safety; -Procedure: if temperatures do not meet the required serving temperatures, reheat the product or chill the product to the proper temperature. -Acceptable food temperatures: meat should be greater than 135 degrees F, potatoes should be greater than 135 degrees F. 1. Review of Resident #17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 4/23/25, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received an accurate assessment reflective of resident status at the time of assessment by coding side rails as restraints on the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, for three residents who were determined to use side rails without restriction of freedom of movement (Residents #50, #23, and #20). The sample was 19. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Process policy, showed: Purpose: To ensure that the RAI is used, in accordance with specified format and timeframes, in conducting comprehensive assessments as part of an ongoing process through which the facility identifies each resident's preferences and goals of care, functional and health status, strengths and needs, as well as offering guidance for further assessment once problems have been identified; -Policy: --The facility will utilize the RAI process as the basis for the accurate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards. Staff failed to obtain treatment orders for a dressing to the resident's left leg, apply compression stockings to his/her legs, and complete an accurate assessment of the resident's edematous (swollen with excess fluid) legs (Resident # 27). In addition, the facility failed to perform a post-fall neurological assessment (an assessment that checks the resident's mental status, level of consciousness, pupil reaction, motor (movement) response to stimulation, and sensation) on two residents (Resident #27 and #15). The sample size was 19. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Care and Services policy, revised 10/22/24, showed: -Residents are provided with the necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and social well-being level of an environment that enhances quality of life in the scope of a long-term facility; Care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bipap (a form of non-invasive ventilation therapy) masks were properly stored for two residents (Residents #17 and #55) and failed to ensure the oxygen concentrator (medical device that separates nitrogen from the air) was set to the proper rate for one resident (Resident #55). The sample was 19. The census was 74. Review of the facility's oxygen administration policy, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Policy: a physician's order is required to initiate oxygen therapy, except in an emergency situation. The order shall include: oxygen flow rate, method of administration (e.g. nasal cannula (NC)), usage of therapy (continuous or as needed (PRN)), titration instructions (if indicated), and indication for use. Oxygen saturations will be measured and documented at a minimum of daily for resident's receiving oxygen therapy. Oxygen items will be stored in a plastic bag at the resident's bedside to protect the equipment from dust and dirt when not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for one resident (Resident #63). The facility identified one resident receiving dialysis. The sample was 19. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Dialysis Care policy, revised 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To provide are for residents diagnosed with renal disease requiring ongoing dialysis treatments; -Policy: --The facility will be responsible for the overall care delivered to the resident, monitoring of the resident prior to and after the completion of each dialysis treatment, and providing for all nondialysis needs of the resident including during the time period when the resident is receiving dialysis; --The facility maintains a contract with a dialysis service provider which addresses communications between the facility and provider; -Procedure: --Communication and Collaboration: -The nursing staff, dialysis provider, and the attending physician will collaborate on a regular basis concerning the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services as ordered by the physician for one resident (Resident #65). The sample was 19. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Laboratory, Diagnostic and Radiology Services policy, revised on 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To ensure that laboratory, diagnostic and radiology services are provided to meet resident needs; -Policy: Laboratory, Diagnostic and Radiology services will be coordinated pursuant to an order by physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist in accordance with the scope of practice under state law; The facility is responsible for the quality and timeliness of services provided by the laboratory, diagnostic or radiology provider. Review of Resident #65's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 4/1/25, showed: -The resident is rarely understood; -No rejection of care; -Occasionally incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel; -Required maximum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible by failing to properly secure the resident's wheelchair to all of the locking mechanisms used to hold the resident's wheelchair in place during transport to another facility (Resident #1). This failure resulted in the wheelchair to fall/flip over backwards during a turn with the resident still in his/her wheelchair. The resident sustained a small gash in the back of his/her head which required first aid to stop the bleeding. The census was 53. The Administrator was notified on [DATE], of the past non-compliance. On [DATE], the facility initiated an investigation, interviewed staff, completed an evaluation of the van with no concerns, and provided video education to the driver related to review of all straps and proper securement of residents for transportation. The deficiency was corrected on [DATE]. Review of the facility's Vehicle and Driver Safety Program, showed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were met, when the facility admitted a resident without physician's orders and failed to provide prescribed medications that evening. The resident was sent to a different hospital, 14 hours later, without physician's orders (Resident #1). The facility did not have a policy for obtaining physician orders at the time of admission. The sample was 3. The census was 49. Review of the resident's hospital discharge summary and discharge instructions, received via email from the facility Administrator on 9/18/24 at 5:11 P.M., with a printed time and date stamp of 8/21/24 at 2:03 P.M. central daylight time (CDT), showed: -Diagnoses of Alzheimer's dementia, high blood pressure, diabetes type 2, coronary artery disease (CAD) with left anterior descending (LAD) artery stent placement (treatment for a condition that occurs when there is a blockage in the LAD artery, which can lead to a heart attack), hypothyroidism (thyroid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs, personal care) received showers in accordance with their needs and preferences (Residents #4, #5, #7, #11 and #2). The sample was 11. The census was 44. Review of the facility's Skin Monitoring: Comprehensive Shower Review Sheet, showed: -Perform a visual assessment of a resident's skin while giving them a shower; -Report any abnormal looking skin (as described below) to the charge nurse immediately; -Forward any problems to the Director of Nursing (DON) for review; -Use the form to show exact location and description of the abnormality, using the body chart: -Describe and graph all abnormalities by number; -A space designated for residents' name and date; -A numerical listing from 1 to 14 for examples of visual assessment; -Space designated for certified nurse aide (CNA) signature and date shower provided; -Space designated to show if resident needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 42 opportunities, 4 errors occurred, resulting in an 9.52% error rate (Residents #4 and #5). The census was 44. Review of the facility's Medication policy dated 10/24/22, showed: Procedure: Nursing Staff will keep in mind the seven rights of medication when administering medication: -The right medication; -The right amount; -The right resident; -The right time; -The right route; -Right indication; -Right outcome; -Additional considerations include: The Rule of 3. The Licensed Nurse administering medications will perform three checks comparing the physician's order, pharmacy label, and Medication Administration Record (MAR): -Compare the Licensed Practitioner's prescription/order with the MAR (first check); -Compare the Licensed Practitioner's order with the pharmacy label on the medication package (second check); -Compare the pharmacy label and MAR (third check); Documentation: -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurately documented clinical records regarding pressure ulcers (injury to the skin and /or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure or friction) for one of 11 sampled residents (Resident #2). The census was 44. Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 4/8/24, showed the following: -admission date 4/7/24; -Cognitively intact; -Able to make self-understood; -Rejection of care 1-3 days per week; -Dependent on staff for transfers, locomotion, personal hygiene and bathing; -admitted with one Stage II pressure ulcer (Partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed without slough. May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister on his/her coccyx (tailbone)); -admitted with one Stage IV pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy by not thoroughly investigating an allegation of a resident being hit in the head by a male nurse. The facility failed to interview the resident and the resident's sibling who reported the allegation to the facility's Marketing Director while he/she was visiting the resident in the hospital (Resident #1). The sample was three. The census was 45. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program, revised 10/24/22, showed the following: -Purpose: To ensure the Facility establishes, operationalizes, and maintains an Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program designed to screen and train employees, protect residents, and to ensure a standardized methodology for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, and crime in accordance with federal and state requirements; -Policy: -1. Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion and misappropriation of property. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident abuse to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) as required, within a two-hour time frame, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1). The census was 45. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program, revised 10/24/22, showed the following: -Purpose: To ensure the Facility establishes, operationalizes, and maintains an Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program designed to screen and train employees, protect residents, and to ensure a standardized methodology for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, and crime in accordance with federal and state requirements; -Policy: -1. Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion and misappropriation of property. The Facility has zero-tolerance for abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of resident property. Staff must not permit anyone to engage in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-05 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure third party liability (TPL) forms were completed for the final accounting for residents who expired, within 30 days. This affected two residents who expired and had money in their accounts (Residents #301 and #302). The sample size was 15. The census was 43. Review of Resident #301's medical record, showed: -discharged on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]; -On [DATE], an ending balance of $4554.33; -No documentation of TPL completed. Review of Resident #302's medical record, showed: -discharged to the hospital on [DATE]; -On [DATE], an ending balance of $4194.75; -No documentation of TPL completed. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:59 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) confirmed Resident #302 expired in September after he/she was sent to the hospital. The accounts for Resident #301 and #302 were locked so she could not access their money. TPL letters were not sent and should have been sent 30 days after the residents expired.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized care plans to address the specific needs of four residents (Residents #198, #11, #13 and #24). The sample was 15. The census was 43. Review of the facility's Care Plan policy, revised 6/2020, showed: -Purpose: To ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan is developed for each resident based on their individual assessed needs; -Procedure: The Facility will develop a person-centered baseline care plan for each resident within 48 hours of admission. The baseline care plan will include at least the following information: Initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, and social services. A comprehensive person-centered care plan will be developed for each resident. The care plan will include measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs. In the event that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when one nurse prepared medications in a cup and handed the cup to another nurse to administer for three residents (Residents #33, #36 and #7). Staff also failed to complete post fall documentation for one resident (Resident #145). The sample was 15. The census was 43. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To provide practice standards for safe administration of medications for residents in the facility; -Policy: Medications must be given to the resident by the Licensed Nurse preparing the medication, or as consistent with state law; -Documentation: The time and dose of the drug or treatment administered to the resident will be recorded in the resident's individual medication record by the person who administers the drug or treatment; -Initials may be used, provided that the signature of the person administering the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program based on resident preferences, to support residents in their choice of activities and meet the needs of the residents. The facility failed to provide adequate organized activities in the evenings and on the weekends. The resident council representatives reported activities to be insufficient. In addition, residents observed and interviewed reported concerns with the activity program, including one on one activities (Residents #24, #37, #28 and #20). The sample size was 15. The census was 43. Review of the facility's Activities Program Policy, dated 6/20, and showed: -Purpose: To encourage residents to participate in activities to make life more meaningful, to stimulate and support physical and mental capabilities to the fullest extent, and to enable the resident to maintain the highest attainable social, physical and emotional functioning; -The facility provides an Activity Program designed to meet the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to staff the facility with a Registered Nurse (RN) at least eight hours a day, seven days a week. The census was 43. Review of the facility's schedules, dated 10/29/23 through 11/29/23, showed on the following days no RN was scheduled on 10/29, 10/30, 11/3, 11/5, 11/6, 11/10, 11/17, 11/18, 11/19, 11/24, 11/25, 11/26 and 11/27. Review of the timecard sheets, showed: 10/29: no RN hours; 10/30: less than 8 hours of RN coverage documented; 11/3: less than 8 hours of RN coverage documented; 11/5 through 11/6: no RN hours; 11/10: less than 8 hours of RN coverage documented; 11/17: less than 8 hours of RN coverage documented; 11/18 through 11/20: no RN hours; 11/24: less than 8 hours of RN coverage documented; 11/25 through 11/27: no RN hours. During an interview on 12/1/23 at 10:00 A.M., the Staffing Coordinator said the facility is usually staffed with 2 nurses, either one RN and one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) or two LPNs. The Staffing Coordinator was aware the facility needed an RN on duty at least 8 hours daily, seven days a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored per acceptable standards of practice. The facility identified four medication/treatment carts and one medication room. There was one medication cart for each of three halls and one medication cart used only by nurses. Three of the four carts and one medication room were checked for medication storage, and issues were found in the medication room and in the nurse medication cart. Staff failed to keep the medication room door locked at all times, separate the medications and food storage in the medication room refrigerators, date an opened vial of tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD, used to diagnose silent (latent) tuberculosis (TB) infection) solution, and to place two locks on the substance controlled medication storage. Furthermore, the facility failed to discard an expired vial of insulin found in the nurse medication cart. The census was 43. Review of the facility's Storage of Medications Policy, revised 11/2020, showed: -Policy Statement: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were afforded the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with persons and services inside the facility. One of 15 residents sampled during the survey period was observed calling out loudly for assistance or attention while staff walked by the resident's room. The census was 47. Review of Resident #37's medical record, showed his/her diagnoses included anoxic brain damage (damage to the brain caused by a temporary lack of oxygen), pulmonary embolism (a blood clot in the lungs affecting a patient's ability to breathe), gastrostomy (a surgical opening into the abdomen for the introduction of nutrition), and Type 2 Diabetes. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of survey, showed: -Focus: The resident has little to no participation in activities due to limited physical mobility. Interventions included: Establishing and recording the resident's prior level of activity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN-form CMS-10055) or a denial letter at the initiation, reduction, or termination of Medicare Part A benefits for two of two sampled residents who remained in the facility upon discharge from Medicare Part A services (Residents #34 and #246). The sample size was 13. The census was 43. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C-09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following: -If the skilled nursing facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these specific services may not be covered and the beneficiary's potential liability for payment for the non-covered services. The SNF's responsibility to provide notice to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their own Grievance and Complaints Policy when staff failed to follow up and document one resident's (Resident #145) grievance for an allegation of missing items. The sample was 15. The census was 43. Review of the facility's Grievances and Complaints Policy, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To ensure that residents, family members, and representatives know about the procedure for filing grievances and complaints; - Any resident, representative, family member, or appointed advocate may file a grievance or complaint concerning treatment, medical care, behavior of other residents, theft of property, etc., without fear of threat or reprisal in any form; - Grievances and/or complaints may be submitted orally or in writing and can be made anonymously through the compliance hotline; -Designation of Grievance Official: The Facility will identify a Grievance Official who is responsible for: -Overseeing the grievance process; -Receiving and tracking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for two residents observed with long, dirty fingernails and food/beverages on clothing (Residents #24 and #246). The sample size was 15. The census was 43. Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, policy, revised March, 2018, showed: -Policy Statement; -Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living; -Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation; -Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services to ensure that their ADLs do not diminish unless the circumstances of their clinical conditions demonstrate that diminishing ADLs are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 26 opportunities observed, two errors occurred resulting in a 7.69% error rate (Residents #16). The census was 43. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To provide practice standards for safe administration of medications for residents in the facility; -Medications will not be left at the bedside. Review of mybrevo.com, showed: -Breo Ellipta, Breo is a prescription medicine used long term to treat: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, chronic lung disease) and asthma: -Patient instructions: Rinse your mouth with water after you have used the inhaler and spit the water out. Do not swallow the water; -Warning and Precautions: Candida albicans (yeast) infection of the mouth and pharynx (throat) may occur. Monitor patients periodically. Advise the patient to rinse his/her mouth with water without swallowing after inhalation to help reduce the risk. Review of Resident #16's quarterly Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication errors when the facility failed to administer ordered medications for two days after admission for one resident (Resident #198). The sample size was 15. The census was 43. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, revised October 24, 2022, showed: -Purpose: To provide practice standards for safe administration of medications for residents in the facility; -Policy: -Medication will be administered by a Licensed Nurse per the order of an Attending Physician or licensed independent practitioner, or as consistent with state law; -No medication will be used for any resident other than the resident for whom it was prescribed; -Medications must be given to the resident by the Licensed Nurse preparing the medication, or as consistent with state law; -Holding Medications: Whenever a medication is held for any reason, the Licensed Nurse will initial the appropriate area on the Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-02-25 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five of five randomly selected Certified Nurses Assistants (CNAs), employed for one year or longer, received the required annual 12 hour in-services. The census was 60. Review of the CNA individual in-service records, showed the following: -CNA G, date of hire 8/30/11, with total number of hours zero; -CNA H, date of hire 11/18/16, with total number of hours zero; -CNA I, date of hire 6/27/18, with total number of hours zero; -CNA J, date of hire 10/16/12, with total number of hours zero; -CNA K, date of hire 1/7/19, with total number of hours zero. During an interview on 2/21/20 at 7:40 A.M. and 8:20 A.M., the administrator said it was the prior Director of Nurses (DON) responsibility to track and ensure CNAs received their 12 hours of continued educational in-service training. As of two weeks ago, it was the unit manager's responsibility, but the unit manager walked out, and now it is the current DON's responsibility. The administrator verified the facility did not have a system in place for tracking and ensuring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-02-25 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment was reviewed and updated at least annually. The census was 60. Review of the Facility Assessment, showed the following: -Facility assessment dated [DATE]; -No further review and/or update of the Facility Assessment annually as required. During an interview on 2/21/20 at 7:40 A.M., the administrator verified the Facility Assessment had not reviewed and/or updated annually since 11/13/17. The administrator said he is responsible for ensuring the Facility Assessment is reviewed and updated annually.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' code status forms were updated annually, ensure code status forms were legible and ensure the code status forms matched the code status listed on the physician's order sheets for four of 15 sampled residents (Resident #3, #7, #105 and #24). The census was 60. 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record, showed the following: -An admission face sheet, showed an admission date of 10/22/18; -A signed code status form, dated 2/15/19, for do not resuscitate (DNR, no life prolonging methods are performed); -A physician's order sheet (POS), dated 1/29/20 through 2/28/20, showed an undated order for full code status (all lifesaving methods are performed). Further review of the resident's medical record, showed no other updated code status forms regarding DNR and/or full code status. 2. Review of Resident #7's medical record, showed the following: -An admission face sheet, showed an admission date of 6/28/10; -A signed code status form, dated 8/31/18, for a DNR code status; -No updated code status form found since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all physician's orders were followed and care met professional standards of quality, by not providing bone stimulation therapy, blood sugar checks, obtaining monthly, admission, or weights recommended by the registered dietician (RD), administering oxygen, monitoring a fluid restriction, reporting x-ray results in a timely manner, obtaining orders for hospice care and not documenting a resident's death for 14 (Resident #24, #18, #307, #3, #40, #45, #32, #27, #26, #7, #154, #28, #44 and #106) of 15 sampled residents, one expanded (#104) sampled resident and one closed (#54) record. The census was 60. 1. Review of Resident #24's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/4/19, showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Extensive assistance required for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; -Lower extremity impairment on both sides;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received a minimum of two showers and failed to ensure the fingernails of two residents were kept trimmed. Of the 15 residents sampled, problems were found with four (Residents #27, #32, #45 and #28). The census was 60. 1. Review of Resident #27's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/6/19, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Dependent on staff for all mobility and personal care; -Diagnoses included heart disease and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the care plan, dated 8/2/13 and last updated on 12/12/19, showed the following: -Problem: Resident requires total care with all activities of daily living (ADLs) due to dementia. All needs must be anticipated by staff; -Goal: Resident will have all ADL needs anticipated by staff and be clean/dry and appropriately dressed; -Interventions: Extensive assistance with bed mobility, facility to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that qualified for restorative therapy services received those services as ordered for three of 15 sampled residents (Residents #3, #32 and #45). The census was 60. 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record, showed the following: -An admission face sheet showed an admission date of 10/22/18; -Diagnoses included history of falls and osteoarthritis (chronic degeneration of the joint cartilage). Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/30/19, showed the following: -Intact cognition; -Required supervision with bed mobility and transfers; -Required extensive assistance from staff with toilet use, hygiene and bathing; -No limited range of motion affecting upper/lower extremities; -No restorative therapy (RT) services received. Review of the resident's physician's order sheet (POS), dated 1/29/20 through 2/28/20, showed an undated order for RT, two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately assess a resident's falls and follow their policy for fall management for one resident (Resident #44). The resident's fall resulted in an injury which required hospitalization. The facility also failed to protect three residents (Resident #18, #45 and #154) out of four observations from potential harm by not following their training guidelines or the manufacturer's recommendation for a Hoyer lift (mechanical device used to transfer a resident from one surface to another) transfer. In addition, the facility failed to protect residents from potential harm by not securing dangerous chemicals and razors on the secured unit, which had the potential to affect all ambulatory residents on that unit. The sample size was 15. The expanded sample size was nine. The census was 60. Review of the facility's undated Fall Risk Assessment and Prevention Policy and Procedure, included the following: -It is the policy of this facility to assess…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident with a history of urinary tract infections (UTIs), received appropriate treatment and services for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine). Additionally, the facility failed to obtain orders for the use, care and changing of catheters for three residents. The facility identified three residents as having a urinary catheter. All three were chosen, one for the initial sample (Resident #28) of 15 and two (Residents #42 and #255) for the expanded sample. Problems were found with all three. The census was 60. 1. Review of Resident #28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/6/19, showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Total dependence on staff for transfers and dressing; -Extensive assistance of staff required for bed mobility, toileting, personal hygiene and bathing; -At risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-25 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post and ensure the daily nurse staffing information contained the required information by not including the name of the facility, daily census and number of actual or total hours for each licensed and non-licensed nursing staff that were directly responsible for resident care for four of five days of observation. The census was 60. Observation on 2/19/20 at 1:10 P.M., 3:00 P.M. and 6:00 P.M., showed the facility's nurse staffing information posted on the board next to the employees' time clock in the main dining room, included the date and number of licensed and non-licensed nursing staff for each shift, but did not contain the name of the facility, daily census and actual/total hours worked for each nursing staff. Observation on 2/20/20 at 7:00 A.M. and 9:45 A.M., 2/21/20 at 6:00 A.M., 7:30 A.M. and 12:00 P.M. and 2/24/20 at 6:40 A.M., showed no daily nurse staffing information posted in the entrance of the lobby, main dining room, nurse's stations and/or outside of the Director of Nurses (DON) office. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records for all controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for three out of three narcotic books reviewed. The census was 60. Review of the facility's controlled substance policy, revised 1/2017, showed the following: -The persons performing the inventory will sign to verify that the inventory was done. All controlled substances are to be counted every shift. The count is to be performed by the oncoming licensed nurse and the off- going licensed nurse. Both nurses will sign on the narcotic sign in and out sheet that the count was completed. 1. Review of the west nurse's cart on 2/20/20 at 8:50 A.M., showed a controlled substances shift change count sheet dated, February 2020, which contained the following information: -18 of 40 shifts with only one nurse signature for the shift change count; -Four of 40 shifts with no count of narcotics. 2. Review of the west certified medication technician's (CMT) cart on 2/20/20 at 8:50 A.M., showed a controlled substances shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented timely in the resident's medical record that any irregularities identified during the monthly medication regimen review (MRR) had been reviewed and what, if any, action had been taken to address it, and failed to have all MRRs documented, for 10 of 15 sampled residents(Residents #27, #32, #40, #45, #3, #7, #28, #24, #34 and #18). The census was 60. 1. Review of Resident #27's medical record, showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included heart disease and Alzheimer's disease; -Pharmacy MRR completed on 1/7/20, with noted irregularities; -No documentation in the record if the physician reviewed the identified irregularities and if action had been taken. 2. Review of Resident #32's medical record, showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included heart failure and Alzheimer's disease; -Pharmacy MRRs completed on 12/4/19 and 1/7/20, with noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep the floors in the kitchen free from food crumbs, debris, and stains and sufficiently air dry dishes before use during three of three days of observation. The census was 60. 1. Observations of the kitchen on 2/19/20 at 10:57 A.M. and 3:55 P.M., 2/20/20 at 12:55 P.M., and 2/21/20 at 7:05 A.M. and 12:00 P.M., showed the following: - The floor tiles and grout throughout the kitchen noticeably dirty with food crumbs, dirt and debris; -Cracked tile under the drying rack parallel to the dish machine with a build up of crumbs and debris; -The perimeter of the grease trap with gaps between the tiles and the lid, with a build up that measured 1 inch to 3 inches, with a thick build up of crumbs and debris. During an interview on 2/21/20 at approximately 1:15 P.M., the dietary manager (DM) said she was aware of the status of the floors. They did not currently have a schedule to deep clean the floors. 2. Observations of the kitchen, showed the following: -On 2/19/20 at 10:57 A.M., three stacks of 12 ounce (oz) glasses, with five…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide information for 10 of 15 sampled residents (Resident #27, #32, #34, #40, #45, #3, #7, #106, #18 and #307) to show they received a yearly Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) to determine the presence of Tuberculosis (TB) or a yearly screening based on signs and symptoms of the disease. Furthermore, the facility failed to provide a second step TST to new employees as per their policy. The census was 60. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Manual TB Control Plan, dated 2019, showed the following: -Residents in long term care facilities have been identified as a high-risk group for re-activation of latent TB infection, acquisition of TB infection and potential spread of TB within the facility. This facility has a comprehensive TB screening program that is administered by the Infection Control Nurse at the direction of the Quality Assurance Committee; -Policy: I. Tuberculin Skin Test (TST, also known as PPD): -1. For all new admissions,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident remained free from restraints, conduct a restraint assessment and obtain a physician's order for the use of a restraint (Resident #45). The facility identified no residents with restraints. The sample size was 15. The census was 60. 1. Review of Resident #45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/6/20, showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Dependent on staff for all mobility and personal care; -Diagnoses included cerebral palsy (CP-a group of disorders that affect a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture), quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down),contractures and gastrostomy tube (G/T-a small rubber tube inserted through the abdomen in to the stomach to administer nutrition and hydration). Observations on 2/19/20 at 10:53 A.M., 2/20/20 at 11:38 A.M. and 1:19 P.M., 2/21/20 at 11:26 A.M. and 2/24/20 at 12:18 P.M., showed the resident sat in his/her wheelchair in the common room. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated to reflect the residents' current needs by not including services and care provided by hospice providers, in collaboration with the facility, for three residents (Residents #106, #54 and #34). The facility identified seven residents who received hospice care. Three were chosen for the sample of 15, and problems were found with all three of them. The census was 60. 1. Review of Resident #106's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated [DATE], showed the following: -admission date [DATE]; -Intact cognition; -Diagnoses included anemia (decrease in the number of red blood cells) and respiratory failure; -Required extensive assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing; -Condition or chronic disease of life expectancy of less than six months; -Received hospice care. Review of the resident's hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents individualized activities, designed to meet the residents' interests and support the physical, mental, and psychological well-being of each resident for two of 15 sampled residents (Residents #307 and #32). The census was 60. 1. Review of Resident #307's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/11/20, showed the following: -admitted [DATE]; -Activity preferences: Listening to music, going outside in good weather and doing favorite activities; -Brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score 10 out of 15; cognition moderately impaired. Review of the resident's medial record, showed the following: -Diagnoses included clostridium difficile (c-diff, bacteria that can cause swelling and irritation of the large intestine or colon) and recurrent major depressive disorder; -No activity assessment completed. Review of resident's care plan, in use during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident with a wound (Resident #154) of 15 sampled residents, received the appropriate treatment and care, by not treating the wound for multiple days, following a readmission to the facility and after a new order was received from the wound care provider. The census was 60. Review of Resident #154's face sheet, showed the following: -Initial admission to facility on 1/27/20; -readmitted on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included heart failure, chronic kidney disease, obesity, high blood pressure, gout (a form of arthritis characterized by severe pain, redness, and tenderness in joints) and cellulitis (skin infection). Review of the resident's treatment administration record (TAR), showed weekly skin assessments on Tuesdays, left blank on 2/4/20 and 2/18/20, with no documentation on the back of the TAR. Review of the resident's hospital discharge orders, dated 2/14/20, showed the following wound care instructions, left lateral leg, cleanse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate assessment and necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing, for two of 15 sampled residents (Resident #154 and #28). The census was 60. 1. Review of Resident #154's face sheet, showed the following: -Initial admission to facility on 1/27/20; -readmitted on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included heart failure, chronic kidney disease, obesity, high blood pressure, gout (a form of arthritis characterized by severe pain, redness, and tenderness in joints) and cellulitis (skin infection). Review of the resident's treatment administration record (TAR), showed weekly skin assessments on Tuesdays, left blank on 2/4/20 and 2/18/20, with no documentation on the back of the TAR. Review of the resident's hospital discharge orders, dated 2/14/20, showed the following wound care instructions, left heel,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychiatric medications were re-evaluated after 14 days of use for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications (Resident #18). The sample was 15. The census was 60. Review of Resident #18 medical record, showed the following: -Diagnoses included dementia and anxiety; -Cognitively intact. Review of the resident's physician order sheets (POS), dated 1/29/20 through 2/28/20, showed the following: -An order, dated 12/2/19, for alprazolam (Xanax, used to treat anxiety) 0.25 milligrams (mg), take twice daily as needed; -No end date noted for the PRN order. Review a pharmacy medication regimen review, to determine if resident had been using the PRN alprazolam dated 1/6/20, showed, If resident has not used it within the past 14 days, please clarify. During an interview with the Director of Nurses and corporate nurse on 2/25/20 at 9:00 A.M., they said PRN anti-anxiety medication orders should be renewed (ordered for a limited time). The doctor and the nurse should re-evaluate usage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two random sampled residents (Resident #31 and #12) and one sampled resident (#307) remained free from significant medication errors regarding insulin not administered as ordered. The sample was 15. The census was 60. 1. Review of Resident #31's medical record, showed the following: -An admission date of 2/28/19; -Diagnoses included diabetes. Review of the resident's physicians order sheet (POS), dated 1/29/20 through 2/28/20, showed the following: -An order dated 2/28/19, to administer Novolog (fast acting) insulin, 18 units subcutaneous (SQ, beneath the skin) three times daily (TID) (scheduled administration time 7:30 A.M., 11:30 A.M. and 4:30 P.M.); -An order dated 2/28/19, to administer Lantus (long acting) insulin 55 units SQ every morning (scheduled administration time 7:30 A.M.) Review of the resident's nurses medication administration record (MAR), dated 1/29/20 through 2/28/20, showed the following: -An order dated 2/28/19, to administer Novolog 18 units SQ TID (scheduled administration time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-12-05 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to make available the most recent surveys and any abbreviated survey results, in a place that was readily accessible to residents, family members and legal representatives of the residents. The census was 43. Observations on all days of the survey from 11/29/23 through 12/1/23 and 12/4/23, showed the main entrance to the building was locked with a sign asking visitors to use the 900 hall entrance. On the other side of the lobby, a set of fire doors leading to the resident living areas were closed. The entire area from the main entrance to the fire doors was under construction. The Administrator's office was located off the main entrance, with a table outside the office. Various items were observed on the table. Observation and interview on 11/30/23 at 9:30 A.M., of the 900 hall door entrance, showed a desk set up by the entrance where the Receptionist sat. The Receptionist said there was someone at the desk from 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M., to let visitors in. During an interview on 12/1/23 at 9:58 A.M., five of five residents who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-12-05 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a representative of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman of resident transfers and discharges for 24 residents, including Resident #21. The sample size was 15. The census was 43. Review of the facility's Transfer and Discharge Policy, dated revised 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To ensure that residents are transferred and discharged from the facility in compliance with state and federal laws and to provide complete, safe, and appropriate discharge planning and necessary information to the continuing care provider; -The facility may transfer or discharge a resident for the following reasons: -The transfer or discharge is: necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility; -The transfer or discharge is appropriate because the resident's health has improved sufficiently so the resident no longer needs the services provided by the facility; -The safety of individuals in the facility is endangered by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$197,132 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $197,132 — penalty dated 2025-05-23
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-28 for 12 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMA HOLDINGS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MANCHESTER HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/24/2023
AMA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/24/2023
ANDREW CAPITAL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/24/2023
DEF HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/24/2023
MANCHESTER PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/24/2023
MO OPERATION EQUITIES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/24/2023
ANDREW, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEENO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/24/2023
MARX, ASHERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/24/2023
WOLF, JACQUESIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/24/2023
CAROSONE, RACHELIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/14/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-49.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$160K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 13%Other / private 24%

This home reported $160K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$442per resident / day
operating cost
$13,438per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$295per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265352. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next