No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rancho Rehab And Healthcare Center

615 Rancho Lane, Florissant, MO 63031 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (314) 839-2150 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$28,060 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $28,060 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-01)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (78%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2686 N Highway 67 · (314) 921-7300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
15390 New Halls Ferry Rd · (314) 831-9916 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi1.2 mi
2505 N Lindbergh Blvd · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
17930 Old Jamestown Rd · (314) 615-4386 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2890 Patterson Rd · (314) 837-2269

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.4%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms82.9%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.4%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.1%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.4%17.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.5%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine41.4%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission38.9%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.4%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.632.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.532.331.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
35.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 35.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 6.7–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge35.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 3.8–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.341.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.49
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.46
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.30
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
78.3%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 81.0 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 78% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-11)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #2) was free from abuse. On the evening of 9/19/24, the resident became upset with Licensed Practical Nurse A (LPN A) when he/she removed the resident's oxygen concentrator from the room. The resident, who had diagnoses of anxiety and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a common lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe by restricting airflow in the lung), was observed following LPN A out of his/her room telling LPN A he/she needed the oxygen. The resident became angry, yelling and cursing, and hit LPN A in the face at least twice. LPN A forced the resident to the ground and placed a knee on top of the resident. After pulling the resident up to a standing position, LPN A forced the resident back to his/her room. LPN A then contacted the Director of Nurses (DON), who contacted the resident's psychiatrist, and received an order for a Haldol (an antipsychotic) injection. LPN A later entered the resident's room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-23 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide basic life support in a timely manner, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, an emergency lifesaving technique used when someone's breathing or heartbeat has stopped) for one of four sampled residents who was a full code (all life saving measures to be performed) and found by staff without a pulse (Resident #1). The census was 91. The Administrator was informed on [DATE] at 3:18 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), which began on [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE] as confirmed by surveyor on-site verification. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medical Emergencies-Code Blue, revised [DATE], showed the purpose of the policy was to ensure the prompt and effective response by facility personnel during medical emergencies through the use of the code blue procedure. A medical emergency was defined as conditions requiring immediate medical intervention and the initiation of the code blue procedure including respiratory or cardiac…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free of accident hazards by not maintaining water temperatures for resident consumption within a safe range to prevent the potential of skin burns for two residents. Staff provided a cup of hot water to a resident (Resident #2) who requested it to give to another resident (Resident #1) who wanted to make instant coffee in his/her room. Resident #2 took the cup of hot water to Resident #1's room, placed it on the over the bed table then left the room. When Resident #1 reached for the cup of water, he/she spilled the water on him/herself which resulted in a second-degree burn (involving the first two layers of skin and may present as deep reddening of the skin, pain, blisters, glossy appearance from leaking fluid, and possible loss of some skin) ranging from his/her right flank to his/her right mid-thigh. Resident #1 had a diagnoses of left sided hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis on one side of the body),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 10 of 10 sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9 and #10) were free from misappropriation of resident property when the former Business Office Manager (FBOM) withdrew resident funds to use for his/her personal use. This had the impact to affect all residents for whom the facility managed funds. The facility census was 84.1. Record review of Resident #1's medical record showed the resident is his/her own responsible party. Record review of the facility maintained Resident Trust Statement for the period 01/01/23 through 05/21/26, showed the following sampled unauthorized withdrawals from Resident #1's account: Date Amount Description04/19/23 $400.00 Personal Needs06/05/23 $100.00 Resident Advance06/21/23 $100.00 Resident Advance07/27/23 $100.00 Resident Advance 02/03/25 $50.00 Resident Advance 02/03/25 $50.00 Resident Advance 04/21/25 $300.00 Resident Advance 05/12/25 $50.00 Resident Advance05/27/25 $150.00 Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to label, date, and cover food and failed to ensure an expired gallon of milk was discarded as indicated. The facility also failed to ensure kitchen equipment and the floor were kept clean during three of five days of observation. In addition, the facility failed to maintain records of dish washing temp logs as well as chloride testing logs. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen. The census was 79. 1. Observation of the kitchen on 3/5/25 at 11:37 A.M., 3/6/25 at 3:33 P.M., and 3/10/25 at 11:15 A.M., showed the following: -Dry storage room: -A bucket of peanut butter without a date; -An opened bottle of lemon juice without a date; -A bag of egg noodles, with a twist tie at the end without a date; -A bag of brown sugar, opened at the end, not closed and exposed to air without a date; -A bag of powder sugar wrapped in plastic and without a date; -A bag of macaroni…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had a system in place to track the required Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 12 hours annual education (in-services). The facility identified 10 CNAs who worked for the facility for at least one year. Eight CNAs (CNA U, CNA V, CNA W, CNA X, CNA Y, CNA J, CNA Z, CNA H), and two Certified Medication Technicians (CMTs), (CMT L and CMT AA) were sampled. The facility failed to document the length of time the training was provided for all sampled staff. The census was 79. 1. Review of CNA U's employee file showed: -Date of hire: 10/19/21; -One in-service was completed; -The in-service failed to show the length of time the training was provided. 2. Review of CNA V's employee file, showed: -Date of hire: 10/19/21; -Twelve in-services were completed; -The in-services failed to show the length of time the training was provided. 3. Review of CMT L's employee file, showed: -Date of hire: 10/19/21; -Thirteen in-services were completed; -The in-services failed to show the length of time the training was provided. 4. Review of CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure newly hired employees were screened to rule out the presence of a Federal Indicator, with the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Registry for five staff members. A sample of eight employees hired were reviewed. The facility hired at least 80 new employees since the last survey. The census was 79. Review of the facility's Staff Screening policy, dated 10/22/24, showed the following: -Policy: The Facility will utilize reasonable and prudent criminal background screening and reference checks for prospective staff, contractors/consultants, registry/temporary staff, and volunteers; -Prior to employment or commencement of a contract, the Facility will verify and document or obtain a copy, if applicable, of the following information that may include, but not limited to: -Previous and/or current employer regarding work history, allegations of abuse against resident, employee or others; -Criminal Background Checks; -National Sex Offender Public Website; -Office of Inspector General (DIG) Exclusion Screening; -State exclusion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide eight hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 18 out of 30 days reviewed for staffing. This had the potential to cause unmet health needs for all residents. The census was 79. Review of the Nursing Department - Staffing, Scheduling & Postings policy, revised 10/24/22, showed the facility must use the services of a Registered Nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days per week, unless a waiver applies. Review of the facility's daily staffing schedule, dated 2/10/25 through 3/11/24, showed no RN coverage on the following dates: 2/11/25, 2/12/25, 2/14/25, 2/15/25, 2/16/25, 2/18/25, 2/19/25, 2/20/25, 2/23/25, 2/24/25, 2/27/25, 2/28/25, 3/1/25, 3/4/25, 3/5/25, 3/6/25, 3/9/25 and 3/10/25. During an interview on 3/11/25 at 8:52 A.M., the Human Resources (HR) personnel said the facility did not have RN coverage for at least 8 hours a day on some days due to no RNs were available to work. She said the facility should have an RN at least 8 hours a day, seven days a week. During an interview on 3/11/24 at 2:33…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure they followed their policy to act on any irregularities noted by the pharmacist during the monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR), which affected five out of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications review (Residents #53, #42, #6, #38 and #51). The census was 79. Review of the facility's Drug Regimen Review policy, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Policy: The pharmacist will review each resident's medication regimen at least once a month to identify irregularities and to identify clinically significant risks and/or actual or potential adverse consequences which may result from or be associated with medications; -The pharmacist will report any irregularities to the attending physician and the facility's Medical Director and Director of Nursing (DON), and these reports must be acted upon; -Procedure: The pharmacist must review each resident's medication regimen at least once a month; -The pharmacist performing the DRR will review the resident's medical record to appropriately monitor the medication regimen and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored per acceptable standards of practice. The facility had two medication rooms, six medication carts and one treatment cart. Both medication rooms, three medication carts and the treatment cart were reviewed, and issues were found with all. The census was 79. Review of the facility's Medication Storage Policy, dated 2007, showed: -Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations, to keep their integrity and to support safe, effective drug administration. The medication supply shall be accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications; -Intravenously (IV, administered into a vein) administered medications are stored separately from orally administered medications, under appropriate temperature and sterility conditions, and following the manufacturer's recommendations; -Insulin products should be stored in the refrigerator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-11 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a process was in place for physician ordered laboratory tests to be completed and results received in a timely manner for four residents (Residents #42, #18, #46 and #11). The sample was 18. The census was 79. Review of the facility's Laboratory, Diagnostic, and Radiology services policy, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Policy: Laboratory, diagnostic and radiology services will be coordinated pursuant to an order by a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist in accordance with the scope of practice under state law; -The Facility is responsible for the quality and timeliness of services provided by the laboratory, diagnostic or radiology provider; -The ordering practitioner will be notified of results that fall outside of clinical reference or expected normal ranges per the ordering practitioner's order; -The Facility will assist in making transportation arrangements, as indicated, to and from the applicable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards by not implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), for one resident (Resident #15) with wounds requiring treatments, gastrostomy tubes (g-tube, a tube that is surgically inserted into the abdomen and is used for liquid nutrition and medications) and when staff provided care for one resident on EBP (Resident #235) then provided care on another resident wearing the same gown (Resident #11) and when staff failed to perform hand hygiene between dirty and clean areas for one resident (Resident #37). The sample was 18. The census was 79. Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents received an accurate assessment, reflective of the residents' status at the time of assessment, by failing to identify the residents' dialysis treatments (Residents #53 and #62). The sample was 18. The census was 79. Review of the facility's Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Process policy, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To ensure that the Resident Assessment Instrument is used, in accordance with specified format and timeframes, in conducting comprehensive assessments as part of an ongoing process through which the facility identifies each resident's preferences and goals of care, functional and health status, strengths and needs, as well as offering guidance for further assessment once problems have been identified; -The facility will utilize the Resident Assessment Instrument process as the basis for the accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity and health status, as outlined in the Center for Medicare and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician orders were accurately recorded and updated for three sampled residents (Residents #46, #18 and #6) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility failed to serve Resident #46 with physician ordered double portions. The facility also failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated and oxygen equipment was covered per infection control standards for Resident #18. In addition, the facility failed to obtain documentation of Resident #18's cardiology progress notes from the most recent appointment when Resident #18 received a blood pressure machine that reported results directly to the cardiologist. The facility also failed to ensure Resident #6's neurological checks (medical assessments used to evaluate the function and health of the nervous system) were completed and maintained in the medical record. The census was 79. Review of the facility's Physician's Orders policy, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: This will ensure that all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care for three residents by failing to ensure one resident received his/her showers as scheduled (Resident #38) and failed to ensure residents were clean and odor free (Residents #38, #2 and #6). The sample was 18. The census was 79. 1. Review of Resident #38's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/27/25, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Required substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bath; -Required set-up or clean assistance with personal hygiene; -Occasional urinary incontinence; -Frequent bowel incontinence; -Diagnoses included heart disease, high blood pressure, traumatic brain injury, anxiety disorder and manic depression. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at time of survey, showed: -Focus: Resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit; -Goal: Resident will maintain current level of function in ADLs;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a motorized wheelchair was in working order after it was reported to facility staff that there were broken or missing parts (Resident #29). The sample was 18. The census was 79. Review of the facility's Maintenance Work Orders policy, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To protect the health and safety of residents, visitors, and Facility Staff; -Policy: Maintenance work orders shall be completed in an effort to sustain maintenance services as a priority; -Procedure: To enable the Maintenance Department to prioritize tasks PE - 02 - Form A - Work Order Form or other similar document will be filled out and forwarded to the Director of Maintenance; -Department directors/supervisors are responsible for completing such work orders and forwarding them to the Director of Maintenance; -Work order requests are reviewed during stand-up meetings; -Emergency requests are given priority; -Emergency requests should be delivered directly to the Director of Maintenance; -The Director of Maintenance will maintain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who received dialysis (procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are not working properly) services had written communication with the dialysis center. The facility identified two residents who received dialysis services. Two residents were sampled (Resident #62 and #53), and issues were found with both residents. The sample was 18. The census was 79. Review of the facility's Dialysis Care policy, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To provide care for residents diagnosed with renal disease requiring ongoing dialysis treatments; -Policy: -The facility will be responsible for the overall care delivered to the resident, monitoring of the resident prior to and after the completion of each dialysis treatment, and providing all non-dialysis needs of the resident including during the time period when the resident was receiving dialysis; -The facility maintains a contract with a dialysis service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an as needed (PRN) controlled pain medication, as ordered by the prescriber, to meet the needs of one sampled resident (Resident #38). The census was 79. Review of Resident #38's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/27/25, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Required substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bath; -Occasional urinary incontinence; -Frequent bowel incontinence; -Diagnoses included heart disease, high blood pressure, traumatic brain injury, anxiety disorder and manic depression. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at time of survey, showed: -Focus: Resident is on pain medication therapy, opioid analgesics related to chronic neck pain, lower back pain, and right leg pain; -Goal: Resident will be free of any discomfort or adverse side effects from pain medication; -Interventions: Administer analgesic medications as ordered by physician. Review of the resident's order summary, dated 12/5/24, showed a physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 30 opportunities observed, three errors occurred during medication administration for one resident (Resident #7), resulting in a 10% error rate. The census was 79. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, dated October 24, 2022, showed: -Medication will be administered by a licensed nurse per the order of an attending physician or licensed independent practitioner, or as consistent with state law; -Nursing staff will keep in mid the seven rights of medication when administrating medications: the right medication, the right amount, the right resident, the right time, the right route, the right indication and the right outcome; -Additional considerations: the resident has right to know what the medication does; the resident has the right to refuse the medication (unless court ordered) and the rule of three, the licensed nurse administering medications will perform three checks comparing the physician's order, pharmacy label, and Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. The facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #11) treatment plan was transcribed on the physician order sheet. This failure resulted in one anti-seizure medication not being adjusted for 46 days. The sample was 18. The census was 79. Review of the facility's Physician Order policy, dated 10/24/2022, showed: -Purpose: this will ensure that all physician orders are complete and accurate; -Telephone orders: a licensed nurse will record telephone orders on the telephone order sheet with the date, time and signature of the person receiving the order or in the electronic health record (EHR); -The order is transcribed onto the physician's order form at the time the order is taken; -Whenever possible, the licensed nurse receiving the order will be responsible for documenting and implementing the order; -Medication/treatment orders will be transcribed onto the appropriate resident administration record. Orders pertaining to other health care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See Event ID Y0PE12. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and facility policies for one resident with a history of pain. The resident was admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE], with an order for acetaminophen (non-narcotic pain medication for mild pain) PRN (as needed/as necessary) and Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication for moderate to severe pain) PRN and diagnoses that included advanced metastatic (the cancer has spread from where it started to another part of the body) cervical cancer (cancer of the cervix (the lowest region of the uterus)) and pressure ulcers (localized skin and soft tissue injuries). The facility failed to process the resident's orders for the Oxycodone and acetaminophen upon admission. On 10/23/24, the resident was readmitted to the hospital and returned to the facility on [DATE], with orders for acetaminophen PRN and Oxycodone PRN and the facility initiated the orders at that time (23 days after admission on [DATE]). In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    See Event ID Y0PE12. This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, refer to the Statement of Deficiencies dated 10/1/24. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy when staff failed to thoroughly document pain assessments and interventions (pain location, what pharmacological/non-pharmacological interventions were attempted in response to pain, and follow-up to determine if an intervention was effective) for one resident when staff identified the resident had pain based on pain scale rating of 1-10 (Resident #11). Twelve resident's were sampled and problems were identified with one. The census was 88. Review of the facility's Pain Management policy, last revised on 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To ensure accurate assessment and management of the resident's pain; -Policy: A Licensed Nurse will assess residents for pain on admission and routinely as indicated by the resident's health and functional status. Facility Staff is responsible for helping the resident attain or maintain their highest level of well-being while working to prevent or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) as required by state and federal regulations, when an allegation of staff to resident abuse was made. On the evening shift of 9/19/24, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A forced a resident (Resident #2) onto the floor, held the resident's hands down and placed his/her knee on the resident to keep the resident on the floor. After pulling the resident up off the floor and to a standing position, the LPN forced the resident to go to his/her room. The abuse was witnessed by nursing staff on the unit and a nurse aide provided a statement to the Director of Nursing showing the resident was took to the ground by LPN A, however, clarification was not sought until the evening of 9/20/24, when staff at the nurses' station were overheard discussing LPN A holding the resident's hands down and forcing the resident onto the floor. The facility began an investigation on the evening shift on 9/20/24, however, did not notify DHSS of the allegations. Five residents were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and facility policies for one resident with a history of pain. The resident was admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE], with an order for acetaminophen (non-narcotic pain medication for mild pain) PRN (as needed/as necessary) and Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication for moderate to severe pain) PRN and diagnoses that included advanced metastatic (the cancer has spread from where it started to another part of the body) cervical cancer (cancer of the cervix (the lowest region of the uterus)) and pressure ulcers (localized skin and soft tissue injuries). The facility failed to process the resident's orders for the Oxycodone and acetaminophen upon admission. On 10/23/24, the resident was readmitted to the hospital and returned to the facility on [DATE], with orders for acetaminophen PRN and Oxycodone PRN and the facility initiated the orders at that time (23 days after admission on [DATE]). In addition, the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacological interventions were only used when non-pharmacological interventions are ineffective or when clinically indicated for one (Resident #2) of five sampled residents. On the evening of 9/19/24, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A removed the resident's oxygen concentrator from his/her room. The resident had diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems). Removing the concentrator caused the resident to yell, curse, and hit LPN A. LPN A forced the resident onto the floor, and then forced the resident to his/her room. LPN A contacted the Director of Nurses (DON) who contacted the resident's psychiatrist and received an order for a Haldol (an antipsychotic) injection. When LPN A entered the resident's room and administered the Haldol and Benadryl (antihistamine that can be used to induce sleep), the resident was calm and no longer yelling, cursing or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed accurately document an event that occurred with one resident (Resident #2) on 9/19/24. Documentation did include Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A's actions of forcing the resident onto the floor, holding the resident's hands down, placing his/her knee on top of the resident, and making the resident return to his/her room. In addition, LPN A failed to document in the resident's progress notes, physician's order sheet (POS) and the medication administration record (MAR) the orders for and administration of Haldol (an antipsychotic) 5 milligrams (mg) intramuscular (IM) and Benadryl 25 mg by mouth (PO) as ordered by the psychiatrist. Five residents were sampled. The census was 89. Review of the facility Physician Orders policy, revised on 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: This ensure that all physician orders are complete and accurate; -Policy: The Medical Records Department will verify that physician orders are complete, accurate and clarified; -Procedure: -A Licensed Nurse will record telephone orders on the telephone order sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) arrived for his/her heart valve surgery with blood thinners placed on hold per order. The resident missed two surgery appointments due to facility error. The facility also failed to ensure one resident (Resident #2) was properly dressed and safe when he/she was sent to dialysis with no pants on, only a brief and no lift pad under him/her despite physician orders for transfers via mechanical lift. The sample was 12. The census was 92. 1. Review of Resident #1's electronic medical record, showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type II Diabetes Mellitus, flaccid (soft or weak) hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) affecting the left non-dominant side, atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), and chronic kidney disease. Review of the resident's Care Plan, in use during the investigation, showed: -Focus: Activities of Daily Living (ADL,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to provide protective oversight for one resident (Resident #3) who eloped, leaving the facility and facility grounds. The resident was missing for at least 30 minutes without staff's knowledge. The facility noted the resident was missing when the police department brought the resident back to the facility, asking if he/she belonged there. Staff failed to document the resident's activity preferences in the care plan, which would distract the resident from wandering. This had the potential to affect all residents who wander and/or exit seek. The sample was 12. The census was 92. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program, revised 10/24/22, showed: -Policy: Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion and misappropriation of property. The Facility has zero-tolerance for abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of resident property. Staff must not permit anyone to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care for one resident. Staff failed to provide personal hygiene for one resident who readmitted to the facility from the hospital and had not received personal hygiene care for over 8 hours (Resident #1). In addition, staff failed to provide eating assistance for the residents. The sample size was 3. The census was 93. Review of the facility's Perineal Care (cleansing of the area to include the buttocks and genitals) policy, revised 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To maintain the cleanliness of the perineal area, to reduce odor and prevent skin infection and breakdown; -Policy: perineal care is provided as part of a resident's hygienic program, a minimum of once daily and per resident need. Review of the Facility's Nutrition/Hydration Management policy, revised 10/24/24, showed: -Purpose: To ensure each resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as body weight and protein levels, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See Event ID 8D9Z12 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to ensure residents were free from accident hazards when staff failed to ensure a resident who was a fall risk, had left sided weakness and required total assistance from staff for personal care (Resident #300) had an appropriate bed to provide stability while staff provided care. The census was 94. Review of Resident #300's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/6/23, showed: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Impairment to one side of upper extremities; -Required substantial assistance from staff to roll from left to right in bed; -Always incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Diagnoses included diabetes, hemiparesis (paralysis on one side), malnutrition and depression. Review of the resident's care plan, in use during the survey, showed: -Focus: Activities of Daily Living (ADLs, personal care) Status: Resident is alert and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food and drink to the residents that was palatable, attractive, and at an appetizing temperature during the survey. The findings include: On 9/19/23 at approximately 12:10 p.m. an observation of the lunch meal was made in the main dining room. Resident (R) #347 was observed having difficulty cutting into a sweet potato. The resident placed a piece of the sweet potato in her mouth briefly before spitting it out into a napkin. Observation of the sweet potatoes being served revealed that they were bright orange (raw) and appeared to be undercooked. R #347 was interviewed on 9/19/23 at approximately 12:30 p.m. during lunch while at a table with other residents. She confirmed that the sweet potato was hard and undercooked. Residents complained of broccoli being overcooked and that there was no bread available. At 12:13 p.m. on 9/19/23, R #55 was observed at a table in the dining room giving his ham and broccoli to his tablemates. R #55 stated he would have made a ham sandwich, but he stated, They said they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one (1) of one (1) kitchen reviewed for food service, in that: 1. Dented cans were found in the for-use section of the dry storage. 2. One pound box of potato pearl was no dated nor sealed. 3. The ice machine was not clean. 4. The indoor central air conditioning unit's return vent was not clean. 5. The backsplash had a black and greenish- substance speckled around the dish machine and pre-wash area. 6. Carts used to distribute resident meal trays were not clean. 7. Hair restraints were not used to cover facial hair and head hair by six (6) of eight (8) dietary staff. 8. There were no sanitizing wipes to clean off the food thermometer when staff took the food temperatures during the lunch meal observed. 9. Cook BB was not aware of the required minimum temperatures for the wash and rinse cycles the dish machine must reach to properly sanitize dishes and equipment. [NAME] BB was also not aware of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for one (1) of one (1) dumpster reviewed for garbage disposal. The facility also failed to ensure the dumpster lids for two (2) of two (2) dumpsters and doors were secured. This failure could place residents at risk of infection from improperly disposed garbage. The findings include: An observation and interview on 9/19/23 at 10:38 am with the Dietary Manager revealed the facility's dumpster area, which was in the parking lot behind the dietary department, had two (2) commercial dumpsters that each had one (1) of the two (2) lids opened, exposing the contents inside. The Dietary Manager confirmed the observations. The Dietary Manager reported the dumpster lids were hard to close sometimes. Record review of the facility policy for Garbage and Trash Can Use and Cleaning, dated 10/24/22, revealed food waste will be placed in covered garbage and trash cans.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for one (1) of one (1) dish machine. The dish machine in the kitchen was not operated within the manufacturer's specification. This failure could place residents who received meals and snacks from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness. The findings include: During the kitchen initial tour with the Dietary Manager on 9/19/23 at 9:56 a.m., the Dietary Manager reported the dish machine was a high temperature machine and the wash cycle was supposed to be at 165 degrees (deg.) Fahrenheit (F) and the rinse cycle was supposed to be 180 deg. F. Observation on 9/21/23 at 11:56 a.m. in the kitchen, revealed [NAME] BB placed the Robot Coupe food processor components into the dish machine after he/she used it to make pureed green beans, and in preparation to use it puree the Salisbury steak. [NAME] BB put the Robot Coupe parts inside the dish machine and pulled the handle/door closed to initiate the wash cycle of the dish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an effective pest control program as evidenced by flies in the facility for residents for three (3) of four (4) facility units (Halls 100, 200 and 300) and one (1) of one (1) dining room observed for environment. The facility had an ineffective pest control program with observations of flies in the 100, 300 and 300 halls of the facility. The findings include: Observation on 9/19/23 at 11:11 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed two (2) flies flying around the resident's room. Observation on 9/19/23 at 11:41 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed Resident #4 seated on his bed and there was a fly flying around the room. Resident #4 confirmed that there was a fly in the room. Resident # 4 also stated while eating his meal yesterday a fly landed on his plate. Observation on 9/19/23 at 11:53 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed at the left corner of the sink, the paneling trim around the sink was peeled off and exposed the wood underneath.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that efforts were made to ensure the reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences in relation to call light access for residents on two (2) of four (4) halls the facility. (100 and 200 halls). The findings include: Observations and interviews made during tours of the 100 and 200 halls on 9/19/23 revealed call light cords were not in reasonable reach of residents. The following were observed: On 9/19/23 at 9:33 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER]-1, the resident was observed sitting up in bed. The call light was not accessible as it was on the floor behind the resident's bed. On 9/19/23 at 9:36 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 the call light was observed clipped to a blanket that was on the overbed table out of the resident's reach. The resident's daughter, who was present at the time of observation, stated the call light is not long enough to reach around to the right side of the bed so the resident can use it with her right hand. The daughter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an adequate surety bond for the resident trust fund account in the amount of one and one half times the average monthly balance for the past 12 months. The census was 97. Review of the facility's Resident Funds-Handling and Recording Policy, dated 5/1/23, showed the following: -Purpose: To provide a means to protect resident funds managed by the facility and account for funds received and disbursed on the resident's behalf; -Policy: In the event that the facility manages the resident's funds, resident funds will not be commingled with the facility's operating funds. The facility maintains accounting records of resident funds and has a surety bond to protect such funds on deposit with the facility. Review of the resident trust account for the past 12 months, from September 2022 through August 2023, showed an average monthly balance of $98,000.00 (this would yield a required bond in the amount of $147,000.00 (one and one half times the average monthly balance)). Review of the bond report for approved facility bonds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of four (4) units were cleaned and well-maintained to provide for a homelike environment. The findings include: Observation on 9/19/23 at 11:11 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed gray rubber/plastic molding at the base of the wall leading to the front of the closet was peeling off the wall. The air vent had little black spots on it and there was a brown stain about three to four (3-4) inches in length on the air vent. Observation on 9/19/23 at 11:41 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed on the wall of the closet close to the dresser there was a black streak about six to seven (6-7) inches in length that appeared to be a wheelchair scraping. Observation on 9/19/23 at 11:53 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed at the left corner of the sink, there was paneling trim around the sink that was peeled off and exposed the wood underneath.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to assist one (1) of 32 sampled residents to maintain his/her dignity by ensuring the resident was dressed appropriately. Resident #79, who was identified as having a self-care deficit with self-performance of activities of daily living (ADLs), was observed wearing his/her T-shirt on inside-out and backwards with the resident's last name and first initial printed across the top in large letters with a black marker. Staff interview revealed the resident did not independently dress himself/herself and did not disrobe after being assisted with dressing. The findings include: The facility policy titled Privacy and Dignity, revised 6/2020, stated: Policy: The Facility promotes resident care in a manner and an environment that maintains or enhances dignity and respect, in full recognition of each resident's individuality. Procedure: . I. Staff assists the resident in maintaining self-esteem and self-worth. V. Resident clothing is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, policy review, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment when indicated for one (1) of 32 sampled residents. On 7/23/23, Resident #18 was determined to have a life expectancy of less than six (6) months and the resident was admitted into hospice services. A comprehensive assessment was not completed within 14 days of the determination of terminal prognosis and election of the hospice benefit. The findings include: The facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised February 2021, stated: Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 9. If a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition occurs, a comprehensive assessment of the resident's condition will be conducted as required by current OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] regulations governing resident assessments and as outlined in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's Care Plan was reviewed and revised after an emergency transfer to the hospital due to a change of condition (Resident #57). The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised February 2021, revealed under the section titled, Policy Interpretation and Implementation, 2. A significant change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that: a. will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions (is not self-limiting); . c. requires interdisciplinary review and/or revision to the care plan; A review of Resident #57's electronic medical record revealed an initial admission date of 12/14/21 with a readmission date of 8/10/23. Resident #57's primary diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease, Schizophrenia and Chronic Kidney Disease. A review of the electronic medical record for Resident #57 revealed a Nursing Note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as order to one (1) of 32 sampled residents (Resident #196). The findings include: Review of Resident #196's closed record revealed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 12:00 midnight, and diagnoses included: Huntington's Disease, Anemia, Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Alcoholic Cirrhosis of the Liver, Ascites, Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Review of Resident #196's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. According to this MDS, the resident required the extensive assistance of two (2) or more persons for all activities of daily living (ADLs) except bathing, for which the resident was totally dependent upon two (2) or more persons. Record review reviewed the following Physician Orders, with start dates of 4/1/23: Lactulose Oral Solution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure quality of care for two (2) of 32 sampled residents, including failure to ensure a resident who went to the hospital due to a change of condition (Resident #57) had an updated Care Plan to reflect the change of condition. The facility also failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff for bed mobility, was positioned for comfort and safety. (Resident #18) The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised February 2021, revealed under the section titled, Policy Interpretation and Implementation, 2. A significant change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that: a. will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions (is not self-limiting); 3. Prior to notifying the physician or health care provider, the nurse will make detailed observations and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to ensure residents were free from accident hazards when staff failed to ensure a resident who was a fall risk, had left sided weakness and required total assistance from staff for personal care (Resident #300) had an appropriate bed to provide stability while staff provided care. The census was 94. Review of Resident #300's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/6/23, showed: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Impairment to one side of upper extremities; -Required substantial assistance from staff to roll from left to right in bed; -Always incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Diagnoses included diabetes, hemiparesis (paralysis on one side), malnutrition and depression. Review of the resident's care plan, in use during the survey, showed: -Focus: Activities of Daily Living (ADLs, personal care) Status: Resident is alert and oriented to person,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was continent of bladder and bowel received the necessary services and assistance to maintain continence for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed (Resident #73) for catheter care services out of 31 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to receive a Physician's Order for catheter use to ensure appropriate care was provided to the resident. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Catheter - Care of, last revised 10/24/22, was provided on 9/21/23. It stated: Purpose To prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections while ensuring that residents are not given indwelling catheters unless medically necessary. Policy I. Each resident who is incontinent of urine is identified, assessed and provided appropriate treatment and services to achieve or maintain as much normal urinary function as possible . V. A resident, with or without a catheter, receives the appropriate care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately and not kept past their expiration dates. Unsecured medications were stored at the bedside without a physician's order for one (1) for 32 sampled residents (Resident #40), and expired stock medications, prescription medications, and glucose monitoring sensors were found in one (1) of two (2) medication rooms. The findings include: 1. The facility policy titled Medication - Self Administration, revised on [DATE], stated: Procedure: . V. If the resident is assessed as clinically appropriate for medication self-administration, by the IDT [Interdisciplinary Team], the Licensed Nurse obtains a physician's order for self-administration of selected medications. VIII. If the IDT team and Attending Physician approve self-administration of medications, the medications will be placed in a secured drawer or cabinet that is easily accessible to the resident. IX. The Administrator/Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided the therapeutic diets as prescribed by the attending physician for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #34). Resident #34 was not served double portions of protein for the lunch meal as ordered by physician. This could affect all residents with supplements and could result in a decrease in calories and potential for weight loss. The findings include: Record review of the Diet Spreadsheet for the lunch meal on Thursday (9/21/23), revealed the resident was on a regular diet and was to receive one (1) Salisbury steak, one (1) #8 (number eight; ½ cup) scoop of mashed potatoes, two (2) ounces of country gravy, four (4) ounces of seasonal vegetables and one (1) serving of fruit. Record review of Resident #34's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Encephalopathy, Hypomagnesemia, and Hypokalemia. Record review of Resident #34's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional supplements as ordered by the physician or recommended by the dietician, to residents identified with impaired nutritional status (Residents #24, #56, #54 and #12). The census was 72. 1. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/30/19, showed: -Supervision required while eating; -Weight: 154 pound (lbs); -No weight loss noted. Review of the resident's medical record, showed: -Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, nutritional anemia, and protein-calorie malnutrition; -A physician's order, dated 1/13/20, for mechanical soft diet with double portions at breakfast and health shakes three times a day; -Weighed 156.8 lbs in December 2019; -Weighed 144.4 lbs in January 2020. This represents a severe weight loss of 12.4 lbs or 7.91% for one month (a weight loss of 5% in one month is considered significant, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-21 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation that one physician, the facility Medical Director, saw residents according to time frames as mandated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The facility identified 48 residents as patients of the physician. Of those 48 residents, 12 were sampled and four of those twelve were identified by the facility as being able to provide an accurate interview. Three of those four residents said they had not seen their physician, only the physician's nurse practitioner (NP). The fourth resident was in the hospital and unavailable at the time of the interviews (Residents #42, #274 and #3). The census was 72. 1. Review of Resident #42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/20/19, showed: -admission date of 5/20/19; -Adequate hearing and vision; -Clear speech - distinct intelligible words; -Makes self understood: Understood; -Ability to understand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure super cereal (calorie dense oatmeal) was prepared and served to residents with nutritional needs and orders to receive it during one meal observation. The facility identified six residents as receiving super cereal. The census was 72. Observation on 1/16/20 at 6:24 A.M., showed [NAME] A gathered brown sugar, cinnamon, butter and whole milk to prepare super cereal. As he/she went to obtain the oatmeal, he/she said they did not have enough oatmeal to make super cereal. The residents who were to receive super cereal would not receive it on today (1/16/20). During an interview on 1/16/20 at 7:50 A.M., the Dietary Manager said they ran out of oatmeal and the food delivery was scheduled for 1/16/20, around 8:00 A.M. Food is delivered to the facility on Monday and Thursday. During an interview on 1/21/20 at 8:39 A.M., the administrator said it was unacceptable to run out of super cereal. She would have expected staff to have gone to a local grocery store to buy the oatmeal. Super cereal was important to meet the residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to label and properly store opened food items in the main walk-in freezer during three of four days of observation. The census was 72. Observation of the kitchen's main walk-in freezer on 1/14/20 at 8:48 A.M., showed: -Two bags of what appeared to be various frozen chicken pieces. The items were in a plastic bag, unlabeled and undated; -One bag of what appeared to be frozen chicken breast patties. The items were in an unsealed plastic bag, unlabeled and undated; -A bag of what appeared to be frozen meatballs in a plastic bag. The plastic bag was tied in a knot, unlabeled and undated; -A bag of frozen pancakes in a plastic bag. The plastic bag was tied in a knot, unlabeled and undated; -A bag of an unknown food item, in a plastic bag, tied in a knot. The item was light brown, with brown crumbs at the bottom of the bag. Observation of the kitchen's main walk-in freezer on 1/15/20 at 7:02 A.M., showed: -Two bags of what appeared to be various frozen chicken pieces. The items were in a plastic bag, unlabeled and undated; -One bag…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure signs were posted at the front and side visitor entrances, requesting visitors not to visit if they were experiencing a cold or flu or had symptoms of either, and the facility had no personal protection supplies such as gloves or masks for visitors to use if they chose to visit while experiencing a cold or flu symptoms or if the facility was experiencing an outbreak among the residents. The census was 72. Observations of the facility's front and side visitor entrances, from 1/14/20 through 1/17/20 and on 1/21/20, showed no signs posted requesting visitors not to visit if they were experiencing cold or flu symptoms, and no signs directing visitors where they could find personal protection supplies such as masks or gloves if they chose to visit while experiencing cold or flu symptoms or if the facility was experiencing an out break of illness. During an interview on 1/21/20 at 11:30 A.M., the administrator said she had placed a sign at the front entrance only, requesting visitors not to visit if they had cold or flu…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2020-01-21 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to mail delivered on Saturdays. This had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. The census was 72. During a group interview on 1/16/20 at 10:00 A.M., nine residents, who the facility identified as alert and oriented, attended the group meeting. The residents said they did not receive mail on Saturdays. Four residents said they cannot receive mail on the weekends because the front office is closed and locked. During an interview on 1/21/20 at 12:13 P.M., the activities director said her department was responsible for delivering resident mail. Mail is distributed to residents Monday through Friday, but not on Saturday. Activity staff does work on the weekend, but mail is delivered to the front offices, which are locked on weekends. During an interview on 1/21/20 at 3:08 P.M., the administrator said mail had not been delivered on Saturdays.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$28,060 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-10-01
  • $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-02-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMA HOLDINGS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MO OPERATION HOLDINGS DE SPE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL99%since 01/25/2024
AMA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/19/2021
DEF HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/19/2021
MARX, ASHERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/19/2021
WOLF, JACQUESIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/19/2021
YOUNG, DANIELLEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/19/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+18.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 14%Other / private 7%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$233per resident / day
operating cost
$7,095per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$285per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265402. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next