No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Carriage Square Rehab And Healthcare Center

4009 Gene Field Road, Saint Joseph, MO 64506 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (816) 364-1526 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Jul 2023Resident-funds citation (F0567)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$48,685 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jul 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $48,685 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-14)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (77%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
2303 Village Dr · (816) 232-6818 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1805 Oakridge Cir Ste 101 · (816) 232-3856 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2219 N Belt Hwy · (816) 596-8036 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Krug Park0.3 mi
(816) 271-5500 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2902 N Leonard Rd · (816) 232-9901

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.2%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.4%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms45.7%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.2%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.5%25.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%17.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.7%23.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.7%63.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission35.3%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit23.2%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.092.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.482.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.8%CMS range 40.8–59.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.3–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge92.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.6–14.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.53
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
77.0%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 93.3 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 77% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-14)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2023-07-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

58 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to notify the physician timely when a resident had a change of condition, failed to start an antibiotic that was ordered by the resident's physician, and failed to obtain a physician ordered urinalysis (UA) timely for one resident (Resident (R) 63) of 33 sampled residents. These failures resulted in R63's hospitalization due to sepsis (a life-threatening emergency that happens when your body's response to an infection damages vital organs and, often, causes death) related to a urinary tract infection (UTI). The facility census was 93. The facility's Administrator and Director of Clinical and Reimbursement Services were informed on 03/13/25 at 3:23 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy, which began on 03/08/25. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 03/14/25, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Change of Condition Notification dated October 24, 2022, revealed To…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-03-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to effectively manage pain for one of one resident (Resident (R) 71) reviewed for pain out of 33 sampled residents. The facility failed to order R71's oxycodone (an opioid pain medication) in a timely manner and the physician ordered pain medication was not administered as ordered. This failure caused R71 to experience terrible pain, was unable to relax enough to sleep, and felt like he was having withdrawals. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pain Management, dated 10/24/22, revealed, . The nursing staff will implement timely interventions to reduce the increase in severity of pain. Review of the facility's policy titled, Ordering and Receiving Controlled Medications, revised 01/2023, revealed, .Written on a medication order form or ordered by peeling the top label from the label and placing it in the appropriate area on the order form provided by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality when the facility staff failed to follow physician orders to be notified of high blood glucose levels (Resident #5), when the facility staff failed to prime the needle of an insulin pen prior to administration (Resident #6) and additionally when the facility staff failed to ensure they had all required supplies for central line (a long, flexible tube inserted in a vein and into the heart) dressing change prior to initiation of dressing change (Resident #4). This affected three residents. The facility census was 85.Review of the facility policy titled Care and Services dated 10/24/22, showed the facility will have sufficient staff to provide services to residents with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing services to assure resident safety and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and that the licensed nurses are to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment when the facility staff failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene between dirty and clean tasks when staff did not wipe all areas affected by urine while staff performed perineal hygiene incorrectly for one resident (Resident #1); when the facility failed to provide a barrier between the residents' catheter drainage bag (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain the urine to an external collection device) and the floor for one resident (Resident #2); when the facility staff failed to wear an isolation gown when transferring or providing cares to residents that required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control measures used to prevent the spread of infection to those at increased risk) for two residents (Residents #3, #4). This affected four sampled residents. The facility census was 85.Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that two resident's (Resident # 1 and #3) who had urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine from the body), received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections when the facility failed to provide proper catheter care management. This deficient practice affected two of the four sampled resident's. The facility census was 89. Review of the facility polity titled, Catheter-Care, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: to prevent catheter associated urinary tract infections while ensuring that residents are not given indwelling catheters unless medically necessary; -Cleanse the outside of the catheter wiping away from the meatus; -Take care to ensure the collection bag does not touch the floor at any time. 1.Review of Resident #1's care plan, revised 9/19/25,showed: -The resident had limited physical mobility related to weakness; - The resident was incontinent of bowels; -The resident had a suprapubic catheter (a tube placed directly in the bladder through a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and infection control measures were used during high-contact care for residents with wounds ( Resident #3 and 4) and indwelling devices Resident #1 and 3), were being utilized for three (Resident's #1, 3, and 4) of four sampled residents. The facility census was 89. Review of the facility policy titled, Standard and Enhanced Precautions, dated 7/1/23, showed: -Enhanced precautions will be used for residents with indwelling urinary catheters and for residents with wounds or presence of unhealed pressure ulcer;- The facility staff were supposed to perform hand hygiene when providing cares;- The staff were supposed to wear a gown when providing resident cares that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy for medical record requests when staff reported they printed and gave copies of electronic medical records without a formal written record request. The facility also failed to provide requested medical records in a timely manner for one previous resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 130.Review of the facility provided policy titled,Resident Access to PHI or Financial Records, dated October 24,2022 showed:-The facility recognizes the resident's right to have access to his/her Protected Health Information (PHI); -All requests for access must be in writing; -All requests by a resident or a resident's personal representative for access to PHI must be directed to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Officer;-A resident who requests access to his/her records shall be given a copy of HP-08-Form A-Resident Request for Access to Protected Health Information or Financial Records. The facility may accept a written request submitted in another form;-If the resident and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident's who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible when improper incontinent care was provided to three Residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3) of the three sampled residents. The facility census was 91. Review of the facility's Perineal Care policy, dated 10/24/2022, showed: Perineal care is provided as part of a resident's hygienic program, a minimum of once daily and per resident need; The purpose of perineal care is to maintain cleanliness of the genital area, reduce odor, and to prevent infection or skin breakdown. Staff are to use clean soapy washcloths when providing perineal care, moving from front to back, using a clean area of the washcloth for each stroke. The facility's current policy did not address the use of disposable wipes. 1.Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS (minimum data set), a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-14 · tag F0847 — widespread
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the Arbitration Agreement, the facility failed to ensure that the Arbitration Agreement presented to Residents (Rs) and Resident Representatives (RR) during admission included a clause that neither the resident or his/her representative are required to sign the binding arbitration agreement as a condition of admission to, or as a requirement to continue to, receive care at the facility. This failure affected all residents who had signed the Arbitration Agreement and any future residents who might sign the agreement. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Arbitration Agreement, dated 10/24/22, provided by the facility, revealed Purpose To provide a lawful opportunity for a provider of health services and residents/responsible parties to enter into an enforceable written contract to settle a dispute outside of court through an arbitration process. The federal government has expressed a policy of support of arbitration agreements because they reduce the burden on court systems to resolve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-14 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was a designated Infection Preventionist (IP) that had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control that had sufficient time to assess, develop, implement, monitor, and manage the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP). The failure placed all residents in the facility at risk for acquiring diseases and infections. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the Infection Control Preventionist Job Description, provided by the facility, revealed Position Description Responsible for assuming the responsibility for the Infection Control Program of the facility in accordance with accepted standards of practice, state and federal regulations and licensing requirements. Responsible for infection control surveillance, prevention and control. Responsible for the data collection, analysis, and reporting findings to the Director and designated committees. In addition, this position is responsible for infection control education for new hires and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-14 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective training program for all staff consistent with their expected roles annually per the facility assessment. The facility failed to provide training related to cultural competency as identified by the facility assessment as a need. Additionally, the facility provided training related to abuse and neglect, infection control, and behavioral health, however, they failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective system to monitor what training staff had or had not completed. This failure potentially allowed staff to work without the skill sets necessary to care for the resident population and placed all residents at risk for negative healthcare outcomes. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the facility's Performance Improvement Plan (PIP), dated 12/13/24, revealed the facility identified the annual 12 hours of training required by regulation has not been consistently scheduled to ensure it is being offered and completed by all staff. The PIP stated the plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-14 · tag F0941 — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective training program for all staff which included training on communication. This failure potentially allowed staff to continue to work without the skills sets necessary to care for the residents. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the facility's Performance Improvement Plan (PIP), dated 12/13/24, revealed the facility identified the annual 12 hours of training required by regulation has not been consistently scheduled to ensure it is being offered and completed by all staff. The PIP stated the plan was for Human Resources (HR) and the Administrator to obtain the list of the required in-service trainings per regulation and schedule the in-services the second pay period each month. The PIP also stated HR will keep track of the attendance at each meeting. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 08/06/24, provided by the facility, revealed the CNAs would receive education/in-services annually on the following topics: Communication - effective communications for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-14 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective training program for all staff which included training on the elements and goals of the facility's Quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program. This failure resulted in all staff not receiving the required training. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the facility's Performance Improvement Plan (PIP), dated 12/13/24, revealed the facility identified the annual 12 hours of training required by regulation had not been consistently scheduled to ensure it is being offered and completed by all staff. The PIP stated the plan was for Human Resources (HR) and the Administrator to obtain the list of the required in-service trainings per regulation and schedule the in-services the second pay period each month. The PIP also stated HR will keep track of the attendance at each meeting. Review of the In-service Calendar and In-services provided in 2024, provided by the facility, revealed QAPI was not a training topic on the calendar and not a training…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-14 · tag F0946 — widespread
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective training program for all staff which included training on compliance and ethics program annually. This failure resulted in staff not receiving the required training on the compliance and ethics program standards, policies, and procedures. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the facility's Performance Improvement Plan (PIP), dated 12/13/24, revealed the facility identified the annual 12 hours of training required by regulation had not been consistently scheduled to ensure it is being offered and completed by all staff. The PIP stated the plan was for Human Resources (HR) and the Administrator to obtain the list of the required in-service trainings per regulation and schedule the in-services the second pay period each month. The PIP also stated HR will keep track of the attendance at each meeting. Review of the In-service Calendar and In-services provided in 2024, provided by the facility, revealed there was a training topic on compliance on the calendar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-14 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have an effective continuing education program for the Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) to receive the required 12-hour in-service training yearly. This failure potentially allowed CNAs to work without receiving the number of hours required for continuing education and skill sets necessary to care for the resident population. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Regular In-service Education for Certified Nursing Personnel, undated and provided by the facility, revealed Purpose: This facility recognizes the importance of identifying, maintaining, and elevating the competency of its certified personnel. This promotes the highest possible level of care to the residents residing in the facility Policy: All Certified nursing personnel will be required to complete at least 12 hours of in-service education annually from the date of their hire. It will be the responsibility of each individual certified employee to meet this requirement by attending in-service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care equipment was properly maintained; and failed to ensure respiratory care was provided per physician orders for three of four residents review for respiratory care (Resident (R) 15, R53, and R41) out of 33 sampled residents. These failures placed the residents at risk for increased risk of respiratory infections and oxygen saturations not being maintained. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, dated 10/24/22, revealed A physician's order is required to initiate oxygen therapy, except in an emergency situation. The order shall include the oxygen flow rate; method of administration; continuous or prn; titration instructions; and indication for use .All oxygen tubing, humidifiers, mask, and cannulas used to deliver oxygen will be changed weekly and when visibly soiled, or as indicated by state regulation .Turn on the oxygen at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. The facility also failed to ensure dishes were properly dried after being washed. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure all items in the kitchen's refrigerator, freezer, and dry food storage were sealed, labeled, and dated. These failures placed all residents of the facility at risk for food borne illnesses. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pot and Pan Cleaning, dated 10/24/22, revealed Invert the pots and pans and place them on a drying rack and allow to air dry. Do not use a towel . Observations on 03/11/25 at 9:01 A.M., with the Assistant Dietary Manager (ADM) revealed the following: -three large metal sheet pans stacked wet. -a plastic container of sugar packets with dried food particles on the container and the container was dirty with dried food particles. -the clean industrial stand mixer was not covered and had empty boxes stacked on top of it that were to go…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program (IPCP) as follows: 1. The facility staff were not recording incidents of infections identified through surveillance, tracking and trending, and the corrective actions taken by the facility. 2. The Maintenance Director did not have measures in place to prevent the growth of water-borne pathogens in the water fountain as identified in the assessment. 3. The facility staff failed to clean and disinfect the multi-use glucometer when performing fingerstick blood glucose testing between residents per the manufacturer's instructions. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 10/24/22, revealed Purpose To ensure the Facility establishes and maintains an Infection Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans which reflected residents' current status for two of 33 sampled residents (Resident (R) 74 and R10). R74 was receiving hospice services; however, there was no care plan developed to reflect hospice services. Additionally, R10 had the diagnosis of and receiving treatment for diabetes mellitus; however, the resident's care plan did not reflect the diabetes mellitus treatment. These failures placed the residents at risk of having unmet care needs. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Planning, dated 10/24/22, revealed The purpose is to ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan is developed for each resident based on their individual assessed needs .The care plan serves as a course of action where the resident (resident's family and/or guardian), resident's attending physician, and the facility's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for one of 33 sampled residents (Resident (R) 89). R89 received metoprolol tartrate (a medication used to treat high blood pressure, chest pain, and heart failure) and metformin (a medication used to treat high blood sugar levels caused by type II diabetes) which was not ordered by the physician. This failure increased R89's risk of decreased blood pressure, heart rate, and drowsiness. The facility census was 93. On 3/14/25, the administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 03/01/25. Immediate resident assessment completed, SBAR completed on 03/01/25, 1:1 (one to one) education provided to CMT1 on medication administration rights. Staff education/in-service medication administration rights/medication administration provided on 03/03/25 to all licensed nurses and CMTs. The deficiency was corrected on 3/3/25. Findings include: Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective antibiotic stewardship program when the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) did not complete an infection screening evaluation to determine if the correct antibiotic was ordered for a urinary tract infection (UTI) in order to reduce the development of antibiotic-resistance organisms for one of four residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for UTIs out of 33 sampled residents. In addition, the Antibiotic Stewardship Program lacked documentation of the tracking or trending of antibiotic usage or where infections occurred in the facility. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program, dated 10/24/22, provided by the facility, revealed, Purpose To limit antibiotic resistance in the post-acute care setting, improve treatment efficacy and resident safety, and reduce treatment-related costs. Policy The Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse and neglect policy when they did not provide education to their staff after an alleged sexual assault by a staff member to a resident (Resident #1) on [DATE] and following an allegation regarding inappropriate touching by staff to a resident (Resident #2) on [DATE]. The facility census was 87. Review of facility policy, abuse prevention and prohibition program, revised [DATE], showed: -To ensure the facility establishes, operationalizes, and maintains an Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program designed to screen and train employees, protect residents, and to ensure a standardized methodology for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, and crime in accordance with federal and state requirements. -Covered individuals will be trained through orientation and on-going training sessions, no less than annually, on the following topics: -Who is covered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of sexual assault was reported to law enforcement (LE) for one resident (Resident #1) when Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) A was observed with his/her hand inside Resident #1's brief by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A on [DATE] and failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the required two hour time frame when Resident #2 reported PTA B inappropriately touched him/her on the leg on [DATE]. The facility census was 87. Review of facility policy, Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program, revised [DATE], showed: -Reported suspected incidents of criminal sexual abuse has been committed against a resident must immediately report this information to Administrator and Director of Nursing Services. -The facility will treat allegations as criminal sexual abuse wherein the facility determines that the resident did not have the decision-making capacity to consent to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation when on [DATE] Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A reported an observation of Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) A with his/her hand inside Resident #1's brief. The facility failed to notify the physician of the alleged sexual assault, contact law enforcement, and have the resident assessed for a medical exam. The facility also failed to have evidence the alleged violations were thoroughly investigated when Resident #2 alleged PTA B touched him/her inappropriately on [DATE] when they failed to notify the physician. The facility census was 87. Review of facility policy, abuse prevention and prohibition program, revised [DATE], showed: -Each resident has right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion and misappropriation of property. The facility has zero-tolerance for abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of resident property. Staff must not permit anyone to engage in verbal, mental,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to screen new employees by completing the 2-step TB test, failed to monitor the transmission of communicable diseases, and failed to track and document all staff tuberculosis (TB) testing. In addition, failed to implement their water management policy and procedures to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella (bacteria that causes Legionnaires' disease, a serious type of pneumonia) when they failed to develop and implement a water management plan. This had the potential to affect every resident in the facility. The facility census was 80. 1.Review of the facilities undated standard operating procedure for 2-step TB testing showed: - Every new employee is required to be tested for TB; - Results need to be checked prior to the employee starting to work; - The skin test reaction must be read between 48 and 72 hours after administration; - A second injection must be administered between day 7-14; - All employees are to be tested annually via 1 step testing; - All tests are to be documented. Review of 12 randomly sampled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional and comfortable environment for resident, staff and the public when they failed to ensure their building was maintained in good condtion. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. The facility census was 80. 1. Observation on 7/14/23 beginning at 9:00 A.M. showed the following: - Outside the building at the end of 300 hall there was soffit sagging causing a large gap exposing the attic space above; - Soffit was sagging outside the exit across from the staff break room. During an interview on 7/14/23 beginning at 4:00 P.M. the Maintenance Director said: - He had worked in the facility for about two weeks; -- The facility should be maintained in good condition. Work orders were submitted by staff electronically . He had not received any complaints about the condition of the facility. He did environmental rounds daily.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents in a manner that maintained their dignity when they allowed Resident #55 to sit in their wheelchair in the hallway with clothing pulled up exposing stomach, and failed to ensure privacy of Resident #70 who was visible from the hallway laying in bed wearing nothing but an incontinent brief. Staff failed to administer medication in a private setting for Resident #49 and #57. Additionally,the facility failed to ensure that Resident #47's room was free of pests and free from the smell of urine. The facility census was 80. Review of the facility's Privacy and Dignity policy, dated 10/24/22, showed: -The facility promotes resident care in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances dignity and respect, in full recognition of each resident's individuality; -Staff assists the resident in maintaining self esteem; -Residents are groomed as they wished to be groomed; -Residents are dressed appropriately;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consider and accommodate the residents' preferences for evening snacks, which affected three of 18 sampled residents, (Resident # 22, #50 and #74) as well as other residents who attended the resident group interview who stated the facility failed to provide them a shower two times a week for one Resident, #43, which hindered the resident's self determination. This effected five of 18 sampled residents (Resident #22, #50, #57, #43, and #74) . The facility's census was 80. Review of the facilities nourishment and snacks policy, dated 10/24/22 showed: - It is the purpose of the policy to ensure the facility provides nourishment and snacks in accordance with the prescribed diet and per the menu rotation; - Individual or bulk snacks are available at the nurse's station for consumption; for residents; - Additional snacks may be made available upon resident request; - Bedtime snacks of nourishing quality are offered to all residents unless…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable homelike environment when the staff failed to properly clean residents bedroom floors, prevent strong urine odor in resident rooms, remove pests in resident bathrooms, and failed to clean fecal matter on the exterior of a resident toilet. This effected two out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 80. Review of the facility resident rooms housekeeping policy, dated 10/24/22 showed: - It is the purpose of the policy to provide clean and sanitary living spaces; - The housekeeping department it to coordinate daily cleaning of all resident rooms; - The floor is damp mopped with a disinfectant solution. 1. Review of Resident #47's, quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/4/23 showed: - Brief interview of metal status (BIMS) score of 4, which indicated severely impaired cognitive skills; - Supervision required for bed mobility, locomotion on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a written notice of transfer or discharge to residents or their responsible parties and the reasons for the transfer, in writing and in a language they understood. The notice should include the effective date of discharge or transfer; the location to which the resident is transferred or discharged ; a statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address (mailing and electronic mail), telephone number of the entity which receives requests and information on how to obtain the appeal form and assistance in completing and submitting it; the name, address (mailing and electronic mail) and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; and for residents with a mental disorder or related disabilities, the mailing, electronic mail (e-mail) address and telephone number of the agency for protection and advocacy for individuals with mental disorders established under the Protection and Advocacy for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a bed hold policy to residents or their responsible party when staff transferred three of 18 sampled residents, (Resident #22, #24 and #50) to the hospital. The facility census was 80. Review of the facility's policy for bed hold, revised 10/24/22 showed, in part: - The purpose is to ensure that the resident and/or their representative is aware of the facility's bed hold policy, and that such policy complies with state and federal law and regulations; - If the resident is transferred to a general acute care hospital, as long as the resident or their representative notifies the facility within 24 hours of the transfer that they wish to have the facility hold the resident's bed; - Residents who are not eligible for Medicaid are responsible for the cost of the bed hold days not to exceed the resident's daily rate of care; - When the resident's attending physician notifies the facility in writing, that the resident's hospital stay is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered trauma informed plan of care which included measurable objectives and timeframes for one of the18 sampled residents (Resident #70) and failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that included the code status for two of 18 sampled residents (Resident #24 and Resident #46). The facility census was 80. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plan Policy, dated, [DATE], showed: -The facility will develop a comprehensive, person centered care plan for each resident that will include the following: o Goals based on admission orders; o Physician's orders; o Therapy orders; o Service or treatments to be administered; o Services that are to be furnished to obtain or maintain the resident's highest practible physical, mental and psychosocial well being. Review of the facility's Social Service Assessment policy, dated, [DATE], showed: -Trauma Informed Care - The facility will: o…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out their own activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide complete perineal care, which affected three of four sampled residents, (Resident #69, #22 and #24) and when the facilty failed to provide a shower twice a week for Resident #43 as well as failed to provide oral care, comb the hair and wash the face for Resident #24. The facility census was 80. Review of the facility's Perineal Care policy dated, 10/24/22, showed: - Perineal care is provided daily and as needed as part of the resident's hygienic program; - Perform hand hygiene and put on gloves; o For female residents, separate all skin folds and wash from front to back, on each side using separate section of wash cloth or a new disposable wipe then turn the resident to the side and cleanse buttocks and peri-anal area without contaminating the peri…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the call light button was within reach of two residents (Resident #15 and Resident #11) which could cause an increase risk of falls or delayed response in the event the resident needed assistance. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper techniques to reduce the possibility of accidents or injuries when transferring two sampled residents (Resident #24 and #55) during the use of a mechanical lift. The facility census was 80. A review of the manufacture's instructions for the Invacare Reliant 600 mechanical lift., dated 2018, showed: - Open the legs of the lift to the maximum width; - Place the straps of the sling over hooks of the hanger bar; - Do no lock the rear casters of the patient lift when lifting an individual; - Locking the rear casters could cause the patient lift to tip. 1. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Trauma Informed Care for residents with a history of trauma when the facility failed to train staff to adequately care for three of 18 sampled residents (Resident #11, #68 and #70) with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition that is triggered by a terrifying event), and when the facility failed to ensure one resident ( Resident #70) did not receive appropriate mental health services. The facility census was 80. Review of the facility's Social Service Assessment policy, dated, 10/24/22, showed: -Trauma Informed Care - The facility will: o Identify, address and support residents' feelings of self worth; o Use a mulitpronged approach to identify resident with a history of trauma; o Identify triggers (a stimulus that causes memories or reactions to severe or sustained trauma); o Collaborate with residents, family, friends and mental health professionals to develop and implement individualized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they employed a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week. The facility census was 80. The facility did not provide a policy regarding RN staffing. Review of the staffing sheets for May 2023 showed: - No RN scheduled for eight consecutive hours on 5/20/23, 5/21/23, 5/27/23 and 5/28/23. Review of the staffing sheets for June 2023 showed; - No RN scheduled for eight consecutive hours on 6/3/23, 6/4/23, 6/17/23, and 6/18/23. Review of the staffing sheets for July 2023 showed: - No RN scheduled for eight consecutive hours on 7/1/23 and 7/2/23. During an interview on 7/14/23 at 5:22 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said: - She had been in her current position for about two weeks; - She was aware there were days without an RN coverage and they are working on a process improvement plan (PIP) for it.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made 13 medication errors out of 26 opportunities for error, a medication error rate of 50%, which affected nine of 18 sampled residents, (Resident #12, #17, #20, #32, #36, #49, #54, #57, and #72). The facility census was 80. Review of the facility's policy for medication administration, dated 2007, showed, in part: - Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medication. Review of the facility's policy for eye medication administration, revised 10/24/22 showed, in part: - Eye medication can be used to anesthetize the eye, dilate the pupil, or stain the cornea to identify abrasions, scars, and other anomalies. Eye medications are also used to lubricate the eye, treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide hot food at a safe and appetizing temperature when they failed to maintain hot foods at or close to 120 degrees Fahrenheit ( degrees F) at the time the food was served. This affected two out of the 18 sampled residents (Residents #22 and #74). The facility census was 80. Review of the undated facility policy titled Food Temperatures, included the following: - Purpose- to provide the dietary department with guidelines for food preparation and service temperatures; - Policy- Foods prepared and served in the facility will be served at proper temperatures to ensure food safety; - Acceptable Serving Temperatures (included): Cereal, gravy, casseroles, meat, entrees, potatoes, pasta, soup, pureed foods, vegetables, eggs at a minimum of 135 degrees F. Review of the facility's lunch menu on 7/13/23 included the following: - Seafood platter; - Macaroni and cheese; - Salad; - Fruit Cobbler; - Bread and Margarine. 1. Review of Resident #22's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to store dishware in a sanitary manner and failed to maintain their ice machine in a sanitary manager, which has the potential to cause sickness to all residents. The facility census was 80. Review of the facility ' s undated kitchen cleaning checklist showed the following: - The Dietary Manager cleaned the ice machine on Tuesday and Friday; - The checklist did not include cleaning containers used to store dishware. Review of the facility ' s polity titled Ice Machine- Operation and Cleaning, dated October 24,2022, included the following: - Purpose- To establish guidelines for the use and cleaning of the ice machine; - The dietary staff will operate the ice machine according to the manufacturer ' s guidelines. The ice machine will be cleaned routinely; - Sanitation of Equipment (including): o Wash the exterior of the machine using detergent solution and clean cloth; o Rinse the exterior of the machine with clean water and a clean cloth; o Sanitize the exterior of the machine with sanitizing solution; o Allow the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of property for one of 18 sampled residents, (Resident #37) when CNA F used the resident's debit card numbers, without authorization of the resident to make transactions. The facility census was 80. Review of the facility's policy for abuse prevention and prohibition program, revised 10/24/22, showed in part: - The purpose is to ensure the facility establishes, operationalizes, and maintains an Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program designed to screen and train employees, protect residents, and to ensure a standardized methodology for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, and crime in accordance with federal and state requirements; - Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment , neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion and misappropriation of property. The facility has zero tolerance for abuse, neglect, mistreatment and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided complete catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care in a manner to prevent infection or the possibility of infection which affected one of 18 sampled residents, (Resident #50). The facility census was 80. Review of the facility's policy for care of catheter, revised 10/24/22, showed in part: - The purpose is to prevent catheter associated urinary tract infections (UTIs, an infection in any part of the urinary system), while ensuring that residents are not given indwelling catheters unless medically indicated; - Cleanse the perineum and urinary meatus (natural body opening) as part of the A.M. and P.M. care and after each bowel movement or incontinence episode; - Cleanse the perineum from front to back and cleanse the outside of the catheter wiping away from the meatus (urinary opening). 1. Review of the resident #50's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/7/23 showed: - Cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided proper respiratory care for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident #77) when staff failed to properly date oxygen tubing and failed to ensure the oxygen concentrator filter was in place, placing the resident at risk for poor quality outcomes related to improper management of oxygen equipment. The facility census was 80. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Oxygen Administrator, included the following: - Purpose- to prevent or reverse hypoxemia (lower than normal oxygen level) and provide oxygen to the tissues; - All oxygen tubing, humidifiers, masks, and cannulas used to deliver oxygen will be changed weekly and when visibly soiled, or as indicated by state regulation. Review of Resident #77 ' s comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 6/10/23; showed - The resident admitted on [DATE]; - Moderate cognitive impairment; - Required supplemental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-05 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were placed in an account separate from the facility operating account and did not allow the residents/guardian the right to manage his/her financial affairs. The facility also did not provide residents access to their funds as soon as possible for 14 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13 and #14). The facility census was 76. 1. Record review of the facility's maintained Aged Accounts Receivable Report for the period 07/01/20 through 06/30/21, dated 07/28/21, showed the following residents with personal funds held in the facility operating account: Resident Amount Held in Operating Account #1 $ 3,876.00 #2 $ 132.00 #3 $11,703.14 #4 $ 210.33 #5 $ 54.00 #6 $ 165.72 #7 $ 62.53 #8 $ 7.00 #9 $ 299.74 #10 $ 7,227.00 #11 $ 9.00 #12 $ 13.00 #13 $ 123.00 #14 $ 39.66 Total $23,922.12 During an interview on 07/30/21 at 12:45 P.M., the Missouri Department of Social Services Constituent Education Representative said facilities are only allowed to keep the Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable homelike environment when staff did not maintain the floors in resident rooms and hallways in clean condition which included the baseboard peeling off around a door. Additionally, the facility failed to properly monitor and maintain a low air loss (LAL) matress for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident #32). The facility census was 76. 1. Observation on 7/26/21 beginning at 10:58 A.M. showed the following: - room [ROOM NUMBER]- The floor behind the entrance door was brown and discolored that could be removed with wet paper towel; - Room#604- The floor around the entrance door frame was discolored brown; - room [ROOM NUMBER]- The floor around the entrance door frame was discolored brown. Dirt and debris was on the floor in the back corner on the other side of the bed; - room [ROOM NUMBER]- There was dirt on floor along the edges and behind the entrance door which could be removed with a wet paper towel. -room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to run criminal background checks (CBC) and check the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry prior to hire. This affected six of 10 sampled staff. The facility census was 76. Review of the facility policy titled Employment Screening, dated 7/1/14, included the following: - In accordance with State and Federal regulations this facility will not knowingly hire, contract or retain any individual that is ineligible to work in a health care facility, that has been excluded from participation in the Medicare or Medicaid programs, or has not met required licensure or certification requirements for the position being considered; - New employees: Unless otherwise stipulated by this policy a new employee may not start working until all of the following is completed or initiated: - The following checks may be initiated prior to an employment decision to hire a prospective applicant (included): o At least two days prior to scheduled resident contact check the Certified Nurse Aide, Certified Medication Technician, Insulin Administration certification…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-05 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they provided residents with a written letter of the reason for discharge/transfer before transferring or as soon as practicable to four of 18 sampled residents (Resident #58, #81, #52, #28). Facility census was 76. Facility did not have a policy for transfer/discharge letters. 1. Review of Resident #58's electronic medical record on 7/27/21 at 11:09 A.M. showed: -Resident hospitalized on [DATE] due to abnormal lab levels. -No documentation of a transfer/discharge letter given. 2. Review of Resident #81's electronic medical record on 7/28/21 at 10:23 A.M. showed: -Resident sent to the hospital on 5/16 due to change in mental status. -No documentation of a transfer/discharge letter given. 3. Review of Resident #52's electronic medical record on 7/29/21 at 2:00 P.M. showed: -Resident hospitalized on [DATE] due to pneumonia (an infection that inflames the air sacs in one or both lungs) and continued shortness of breath. -No documentation of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-05 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff issued a notice of their bed-hold policy prior to/upon transferring four of eighteen sampled residents (Resident #58, #81, #52, and #28) to the hospital. Facility census was 76. Facility did not have a bed-hold with transfers policy. 1. Review of Resident #58's electronic medical record on 7/27/21 at 11:09 A.M. showed: -Resident hospitalized on [DATE] due to abnormal lab levels. -No documentation of the bed hold policy provided. 2. Review of Resident #81's electronic medical record on 7/28/21 at 10:23 A.M. showed: -Resident sent to the hospital on 5/16/21 due to change in mental status. -No documentation of the bed hold policy provided. 3. Review of Resident #52's electronic medical record on 7/29/21 at 2:00 P.M. showed: -Resident hospitalized on [DATE] due to pneumonia (an infection that inflames the air sacs in one or both lungs) and continued shortness of breath. -No documentation of the bed hold policy provided. 4. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed professional standards of practice on four of 18 sampled residents when staff crushed a medication on the do not crush list which affected one resident (Resident #7) and failed to follow physicians orders for splints/cloth rags for contracted hands for Resident #34; failed to follow physician's orders for oxygen and protective boots to prevent and heal pressure ulcers for resident #12 and #52. The facility census was 76. 1. Review of Resident #7's quarterly minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), dated 7/15/21 showed: -Resident is non-interviewable. -Resident has physical and verbal behavioral symptoms. -Resident requires one or two staff assistance on all activities of daily living (ADLs). -No swallowing disorder. -Diagnoses include: progressive neurological conditions and Alzheimer's disease. During an observation and record review on 7/29/21 at 7:43 A.M. showed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided proper respiratory care when staff failed to date oxygen tubing, clean oxygen concentrator filters, document oxygen tubing changes, and provide humidifier bottles with oxygen administration, which affected three of 18 sampled residents (Residents #35, #70, and #77). The facility census was 76. Review of facility policy, Medical Equipment Disinfection, dated 8/24/18, showed: -Dedicated medical equipment will be cleaned at least weekly and/or when they become visibly soiled. -Humidification bottles should be changed monthly, when visibly soiled, or if it malfunctions. -Oxygen tubing should be changed monthly, when visibly soiled, if contamination occurs, or if it malfunctions. 1. Observation and record review on 7/27/21 at 9:18 A.M. showed: -Resident #35's oxygen concentrator filter was fuzzy. -Physician's order showed oxygen at six liters (L) continuous. 2. Observation and record review on 7/26/21 at 3:11 P.M. showed: -Resident #70's oxygen concentrator filter was dusty. -Physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff failed to keep a clean kitchen, failed to label seasoning when it was received, and failed to ensure they kept food covered when they were not preparing or serving it. The facility census was 76. Review of the undated facility policy titled Three Compartment Sinks- Manual Dishwashing, included the following: - Fill the first sink with detergent and water; - Fill the second sink with clean water; - Fill the third sink with water and sanitizer to the corrected concentration. Hot water can be used as an alternative; - Wash items in the first sink- use a brush, towel, or nylon scrub pad to loosen dirty. Change the water and detergent when the suds are gone or the water is dirty; - Rinse items in the second sink. Spray the items with water or dip them in it. Make sure to remove all traces of food and detergent from the items being rinsed. If dipping items, change the water when it becomes dirty or full of suds; -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and observation the facilty failed to obtain physician orders and assess the residents for safe administartion of medication to be kept at the bedside for two residents (Resident #15 and #329) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 76. The facility did not provide a policy for administration of bedside medications. 1. Review of Resident #15 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by staff, dated 7/22/21 showed: - Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a test to determine the resident's cognitive function, score of 11, the resident is able to make good decisions. - Functional status: Bed Mobility extensive assistance with two or more staff, transfer with total dependence of two or more staff, locomotion on and off the unit independent with setup from staff, dressing with extensive assistance of one staff member; eating he/she is independent with setup from staff, toilet use extensive assistance with two or more staff, personal hygiene extensive assistance with one staff member, bathing he/she is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach for eight of eighteen sampled residents (Resident #4, #12, #20, #34, #25 and #73) with limited range of motion and limited mobility. The facility also failed to ensure one additional resident ( Resident #52) had an indwelling catheter anchor when staff failed to following physician's orders for catheter securing device (a device used to stabilize the catheter tubing to decrease tension and facilitate urine flow). The facility census was 76. The facility did not provide a policy on call lights or indwelling catheter anchors. 1. Review of Resident # 34's Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff dated 6/30/21 showed: - Diagnosis of low back pain, anxiety disorders, chronic pain, CVA (stroke), Hemiplegia (Paralysis of one side of the body) - admitted to hospice on 9/2/21 ; -Two person physical assist, needs extensive assistance; -Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMs) showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0577 — isolated
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure recent survey results were available to residents. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 76. The facility did not have a policy regarding the survey book results. Observation on 7/26/21 at 12:10 P.M. showed the survey book only had results from 2019. During an interview on 7/27/21 at 5:00 P.M showed and the Administrator said: -The book only had results from 2019. -He/she thought it was updated. -2020 findings had been pulled and not placed back in the book. During an interview on 7/28/21 at 1:57 P.M the Interim Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and ADON said: -The survey book should be updated with all surveys, investigations, and infection control surveys.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, The facility failed to ensure restorative nursing services were maintained in accordance with therapy recommendations to maintain or improve and to prevent further decline in mobility and/or range of motion. The facility census was 76. Review of the facility policy titled Restorative Nursing, dated 5/22/08, included the following: - Restorative/rehabilitative programs will be used for residents who have been identified through assessment to have activities of daily living (ADL) deficits that have a reasonable likelihood for improvement or maintenance functional levels; - All residents will have a completed restorative nursing assessments completed within 14 days of admission; - Task analysis worksheets will be completed for deficit areas targeted for a restorative program. This task analysis will be used to provide additional evaluation of the deficit area; - A monthly progress note will be written for each resident and the program they are participating in that will address the resident's response to the program and their progress towards the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to properly assess and receive physician orders for two residents before utilizing bed rails. This affected two of 18 sampled residents (Residents #58, and #70). The facility census was 76. 1. Review of Resident #58's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 6/16/21, included the following: - Date admitted [DATE]; - Cognitively intact; - Required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use. Review of the resident's undated care plan did not show that the use of side rails. Review of the resident's medical records on 6/27/21 showed the following: - Bed rail assessment dated [DATE] indicating the interdisciplinary team found it beneficial for the resident to have bed rails; - The July 2021 Physician Orders Sheet (POS) did not include an order for bed rails. Observation on 07/26/21 at 11:15 A.M. showed the resident had 1/3 bed rails on both sides of his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing was posted daily. Facility census was 76. The facility did not have a policy for Daily Nurse Staffing. Observation on 07/26/21 at 12:10 P.M. showed the daily nurse staffing posted outside the social services door dated 7/20/21. Observation on 07/27/21 at 07:25 A.M. showed daily nurse staffing sheet still said 7/20/21. Observation and interview on 07/27/21 at 5:00 P.M. showed and the Administrator said: -Daily nurse staffing sheet still said 7/20/21. -He/she thought the daily nurse staffing was posted as required. -Nurse staffing should be posted daily. During an interview on 07/28/21 at 1:57 P.M. the Interim Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and ADON said: -The Business Office Manager is responsible for posting the nurse staffing every day. During an interview on 07/28/21 at 4:57 P.M. the Business Office Manager said: -He/she is responsible for posting the nurse staffing everyday. -He/she normally gets the staffing information from the Director of Nursing (DON) but he/she is off on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents knew they had a choice for an alternative meal before the were served the meal on the main menu. This affected two of 18 sampled resident ( Resident's #34 and #48) and two additional residents (Residents #4 and #12). The facility census was 76. 1. Review of Resident #35's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 6/2/21, included the following: - Date admitted [DATE]; - Cognitively intact. During an interview on 7/28/21 at 12:32 P.M. the resident said: - Menus were posted at end of the hall; - He/she did not have a menu and they did not typically pass them out but if you ask, nurses can tell you what is on the menu; - If you do not like what they serve then you can get an alternate. Staff will tell them what else is available if they do not like what is being served. 2. Review of Resident #48's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] included the following: - Date admitted [DATE];…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely access to resident electronic medical records (EMR), staff list, and resident matrix (a document listing all resident's and their clinical characteristics) from 1/27/2026 at 9:50 A.M. through 1/27/2026 at 12:00 P.M. This resulted in the surveyors being unable to timely review necessary records to conduct the survey and review of care provided to residents. The facility census was 98. No policy regarding providing access to medical records in a timely manner was provided by the facility.During an Interview on 1/27/26 at 9:50 A.M. the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were provided with a list of items needed that included a resident matrix (a comprehensive, mandated document used by nursing homes to list all current residents and track key clinical care categories including resident room numbers. The document defines patient care categories for residents, aiding in the selection of a sample, for surveys.) and access to EMR so the surveyors could conduct the abbreviated survey process.During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$48,685 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $48,685 — penalty dated 2025-03-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMA HOLDINGS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MO OPERATION HOLDINGS DE SPE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL99%since 01/25/2024
AMA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/19/2021
DEF HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/19/2021
MARX, ASHERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/19/2021
WOLF, JACQUESIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/19/2021
BYROM, AMYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+14.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 44%Medicare 15%Other / private 41%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$223per resident / day
operating cost
$6,794per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$262per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265336. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next