No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Oasis Nursing & Rehab Of Green Valley

100 Delmar Gardens Drive, Henderson, NV 89074 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 242 certified beds · (702) 361-6111 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (702) 361-6111 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
80 N Pecos Rd · (702) 912-1400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2599 Wigwam Pkwy · (702) 361-3536 · Call to confirm hours
Park
150 N Pecos Rd · (702) 267-5710 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
100 N Pecos Rd · (702) 610-9312

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.0%12.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.9%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%1.6%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%1.9%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.9%5.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%2.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.7%13.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.6%22.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine60.7%89.6%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.1%15.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.0%17.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.8%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine25.7%80.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.3%23.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.4%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.131.851.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.231.451.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 103 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.5%CMS range 35.3–58.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 6.5–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge31.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge27.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 4.8–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.23
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.81
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
42.3%
Total nursing turnover
34.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 242 beds and averages 192.6 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-26)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency within the required timeframe for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to delay reporting of alleged abuse and place the resident at risk for continued abuse. Findings include:Resident 1 (R1) was admitted [DATE], with diagnosis including osteomyelitis, cognitive communication deficit, and dementia unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic mood disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety.On 04/13/2026 at 8:55 AM, R1 reported that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) became upset because they played with the sheets and did not pay attention to the CNA. R1 indicated the CNA was rude and hit them in the right eye, on purpose, not by accident. R1 explained their eye hurt that day and no one checked R1's eye. R1 reported the incident to the nurse that same day and did not get a response from them. R1 explained they did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure each resident or resident's guardian provided signed evidence of informed consent prior to the administration of a psychoactive medication, for 2 of 51 sampled residents (Residents 169 and 191). The deficient practice had the potential to put residents at risk of using psychoactive medication without understanding the risks and benefits of the medication. Findings include: 1) Resident 169 (R169) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder. The medical record indicated a guardian had been appointed to make medical decisions for R169. A Physician Order dated 09/20/2024 indicated to give Quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication) 25 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for mood related to bipolar disorder. A review of the September 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident had taken Quetiapine every evening of the month. The MAR indicated R169 was monitored for potential side effects of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a significant change in status assessment was completed for a hospice resident for 1 of 3 closed record sampled residents (Resident 200). The deficient practice had the potential for a hospice plan of care to not be generated. Findings include: Resident 200 (R200) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia and protein-calorie malnutrition. An Alert Note dated 07/24/2025 revealed R200 was admitted to hospice care.The medical record lacked documented evidence that a significant change in status assessment was completed when R200 was admitted to the hospice program on 07/24/2025.On 09/26/2025 at 8:20 AM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator reviewed R200's medical record and confirmed R200 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was enrolled into the hospice program on 07/24/2025. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that a significant change in status assessment was not completed for R200 in accordance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to develop a hospice care plan for 1 of 3 closed record sampled residents (Resident 200). The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for receiving inadequate hospice care.Findings include:Resident 200 (R200) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia and protein-calorie malnutrition. An Alert Note dated 07/24/2025 revealed R200 was admitted to hospice care.The medical record lacked documented evidence that a hospice care plan was developed after R200 was admitted to hospice.On 09/26/2025 at 8:30 AM, the Minimum Date Set (MDS) Coordinator confirmed a hospice care plan was not developed when R200 enrolled into hospice on 07/24/2025 because the significant change in status assessment was not completed in accordance with resident assessment instrument (RAI) requirements.On 09/26/2025 at 9:56 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained there was no significant change in status assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided as scheduled for a resident who required assistance with bathing for 1 of 51 sampled residents (Resident 202). The deficient practice had the potential to result in poor hygiene, increased risk for skin breakdown and negatively affect resident's dignity and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Resident 202 (R202) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 06/01/2025 with diagnoses including Wernicke's encephalopathy, alcohol-induced chronic pancreatitis, and auditory hallucinations.The resident census documented R202 resided in room [ROOM NUMBER]B from 03/27/2025 to 05/08/2025, and room [ROOM NUMBER]B from 05/08/2025 to 06/01/2025.The facility document titled Preferred Shower Schedule for the 200-hall documented 203B was to receive showers on day shift Wednesday and Saturday. room [ROOM NUMBER]B was to receive showers on evening shift Tuesdays and Fridays.A Care Plan dated 04/07/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a risk assessment for pressure ulcer development was completed and 2) a new skin impairment was identified and addressed for 1 of 51 sampled residents (Resident 12). The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for new or worsening pressure ulcers.Findings include:Resident 12 (R12) was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD), and acute osteomyelitis of ankle and foot.On 09/23/2025 at 9:55 AM, R12 was alert while seated in wheelchair. R12 recounted being hospitalized in July 2025 and a right foot wound was identified by emergency department (ED) staff which according to the resident was a new wound. R12 indicated being treated for osteomyelitis with intravenous (IV) antibiotics which was resumed upon returning to the facility.1) The facility policy titled Pressure Injury Risk Assessment, revised March 2020, documented to use a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and a safe environment to prevent a resident with cognitive impairment from accessing and ingesting non-food items for 1 of 51 sampled residents (Resident 17). The deficient practice had the potential to result in choking, gastrointestinal upset or other adverse health outcomes. Findings include: 1) Resident 17 (R17) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, hyperglycemia, and bipolar disorder. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) evaluation dated 09/15/2025 documented a score of zero indicating R17 had severe cognitive impairment. A Progress Note dated 09/20/2025 documented R17 was taking sugar packets from the service area and was redirected. A Progress Note dated 09/22/2025 documented R17 was rummaging and taking sugar packets. When staff attempted to take sugar packets away, the resident started yelling R17 was given space, R17 eventually sat down, and staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the temperature, dating, and labeling of food in residents' personal refrigerators were properly monitored for 3 of 51 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2 and 136) and one unsampled resident (Resident 125). The deficient practice had the potential to lead to foodborne illness.Findings include:1) On 09/25/2025 at 10:45 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), indicated Certified Nursing Assistances (CNAs) were responsible for cleaning the resident personal refrigerators weekly and on weekends. The LPN observed Resident 2's personal refrigerator and agreed the refrigerator was dirty and freezer had a buildup of ice and needed to be cleaned.The LPN explained, food brought in by family members must be stored in the refrigerator for no more than three days (72 hours). The LPN verbalized if the food remained beyond the expiration date, it was to be discarded by the CNAs. The LPN stated food must be dated either by staff or by the family. The LPN reiterated food items with manufacturer expiration dates must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure cabinet and refrigerator locks were in working condition in the specialty care unit. The deficient practice had the potential to pose a safety risk to residents with dementia who resided in the unit.Findings include:On 09/23/2025 at 8:10 AM, an inspection of the specialty care unit revealed two wooden cabinets and a staff refrigerator with broken locks. The Director of Maintenance turned the locks and confirmed the cabinet and refrigerator locks were broken. Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA1) indicated the first cabinet contained food condiments and plastic cutlery while the second drawer contained three opened bottles of dish soap.On 09/23/2025 at 8:15 AM, CNA1 explained the specialty care unit housed 17 residents with a diagnosis of dementia and all cabinets and refrigerators must be kept secure and contents inaccessible for safety reasons.On 09/25/2025 at 8:44 AM, a revisit to the specialty care unit revealed the first cabinet was missing a drawer face and had no knob while the bottom drawer had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the water management plan was enforced. Findings include: During a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility had not been following the facility policy titled, Legionella Water Management Program, dated [DATE]. The policy contained a checklist of items to inspect, the frequency to inspect them, and how to inspect the items. The checklist documented, Record All Actions Taken in Your Water Management Plan Binder - Section 9. On [DATE] at 10:30 AM, the Administrator and Maintenance Director explained the facility became aware of a possibility of Legionella in the building's water system when representatives from Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD) came to the facility on [DATE]. The facility was informed two prior residents had tested positive for Legionella and SNHD and a representative from Health Care Quality and Compliance (HCQC) were at the facility to consult with the facility's team to ensure safety. The Maintenance Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was kept safe from abuse for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 4). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident to experience emotional distress and physical harm. Findings include: Resident 4 (R4) R4 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral palsy, depression, anxiety disorder, and diabetes mellitus. The resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) evaluation with a score of 15, denoting the resident's cognition is intact. Resident 5 (R5) R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage, chronic respiratory failure, dementia, and depression. The resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) evaluation with a score of 15, denoting the resident's cognition is intact. The facility reported incident (FRI) dated 02/19/2024 documented the following: -On 02/19/2025 at approximately 1:45 PM, R4 reported to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the wrong medication was not administered to a resident for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 3). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for kidney transplant complications. Findings include: Resident 3 (R3) R3 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD), and kidney transplant status. A physician order dated 02/24/2022 documented to give Tacrolimus 0.5 milligram (mg), one capsule (a form of oral medication made of a gelatin or plant-based shell filled with powder, liquid, or granules) by mouth once a day for kidney transplant. (Tacrolimus- an anti-rejection medication prescribed to patients who receive organ transplant for the purpose of suppressing immune response). A medication error report dated 01/25/2025 revealed R3 was administered Cialis 5 mg tablet (a form of oral medication in solid form of compressed powder which may be coated, scored, or split)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' behavior was monitored and documented for residents receiving psychoactive medications for 6 of 25 sampled residents (Residents 44, 102, 5, 161, 4, and 99). This deficient practice could have increased the risk of adverse side effects, ineffective medication management, missed signs of worsening conditions, and compromised resident safety. Findings include: A facility policy titled Medication Monitoring and Management revised in November 2014, indicated the resident's medication regimen required monitoring for significant negative changes from baseline. Medications were to be ruled out as the cause of these changes, following the policy on detecting and preventing adverse consequences. Resident 44 (R44) R44 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including depression, dementia with behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A Physician Order dated 09/01/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to make choices about aspects of their life in the facility which are significant to the resident for 1 of 35 sampled residents and 3 unsampled residents (Residents #126, 14, 118 and 41). The failure to accommodate the residents' preferences and choices had the potential risk to cause psychosocial distress to the residents. Findings include: The facility is located off a minor street which leads to an entrance to the facility parking lot where the facility has a large, covered portico which joins a large wrap around porch area before the entrance to the facility. In this porch area before the facility's main entrance are numerous park benches to sit and enjoy the quiet view of the front flower garden of the facility. Resident 126 (R126) R126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of hypertension and chronic kidney disease. R126 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurate, specifically for vision, hearing, and functional status impacting activities of daily living for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 96). The deficient practice potentially deprived the resident of a person-centered plan of care ensuring the resident received adequate level of assistance with care needs. Findings include: Resident 96 (R96) R96 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic vision loss, chronic hearing loss, Parkinson's disease and weakness. On 09/24/2024 at 8:38 AM, R96 laid in bed with eyes opened, an untouched breakfast tray was in front of the resident. After introduction, R96 requested surveyor to come closer and speak louder due to difficulty hearing. As the surveyor walked around the resident's bed to come closer to left side, the resident maintained frontal gaze and did not follow the surveyor's movement. R96 asked surveyor if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 2 evaluation for displayed behavioral activity or diagnosis for 3 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 99, 135, and 72). The deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of not being evaluated for appropriate determination of necessary behavioral health services. Findings include: Resident #99 R99 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including psychosis and bipolar. The PASRR level 1 utilized for R99's admission was dated 09/28/2020, documented diagnoses of dementia and Alzheimer. On 09/24/2024 at 9:30 AM and 09/26/2024 at 10:20 AM, R99 was observed lying in bed with day clothing. R99 was awake and would answer simple questions. R99 was noticed to mumble words to self when not spoken to. R99's care plan problem with a start date of 03/28/2023 documented: Resident is at risk for adverse consequence related to receiving psychotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and document review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were created for the management of sleep apnea devices for 2 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 64 and 390). The deficient practice had a potential for staff not to provide person centered care for a resident. Findings include: Resident 64 (R64) R64 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including open wound lower back and pelvis and hemiplegia after cerebral infarction. On 09/24/2024 at 1:43 PM, at R64's bedside table was breathing equipment. R64 indicated it was a CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) machine (a device that helps treat sleep-related breathing disorders, such as sleep apnea, by keeping airways open while you sleep). R64 indicated using the CPAP at night and self manages the equipment and does the self-application of the nasal mask. R64 indicated bringing the equipment from home upon admission. Physician and nursing progress notes lacked documented evidence R64 was using the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a deep tissue injury in a high risk resident was treated, and appropriate interventions were implemented and the weekly skin assessment was completed as scheduled for 1 of 25 sampled residents (R52). This deficient practice had the potential to lead to worsening of the pressure injury, increased risk of infection, delayed healing, further tissue damage, and a higher likelihood of complications such as sepsis or hospitalization. Findings include: Resident 52 (R52) R52 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and gastrostomy. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 07/20/2024, documented a score of 10, which indicated a high risk for developing a pressure sore. The admission Skin assessment dated [DATE], documented R52 had a left heel, old wound. The Care Plan dated 07/14/2024 documented R52 was at risk for skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was clinically blind was provided assistance with food and fluids for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 96). The deficient practice potentially contributed to the resident's significant weight loss and hospitalization. The resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE] due to poor oral intake and weakness and on 09/27/2024 due to dehydration. Findings include: Resident 96 (R96) R96 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic vision loss, chronic hearing loss, weakness, abnormal weight loss and nutritional deficiency. On 09/24/2024 at 8:38 AM, R96 laid in bed with eyes opened, an untouched breakfast tray was in front of the resident. After introduction, R96 requested surveyor to come closer and speak louder due to difficulty hearing. While the surveyor walked around the resident's bed to come closer to left side, the resident maintained frontal gaze and did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the physician orders for bolus tube feeding, water flushes, and gastrostomy tube care were obtained for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 52). This deficient practice had the potential to result in improper nutrition, dehydration, increased risk of infection, gastrointestinal complications, delayed healing, and potential hospital readmission. Findings include: Resident 52 (R52) R52 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia, diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and gastrostomy. The admission Skin assessment dated [DATE], documented R52 had Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) (a feeding tube inserted into the stomach through the abdomen for nutrition) tube in place. A Care Plan dated 07/14/2024, documented R52 received nutritional support through a feeding tube with a risk of aspiration. Interventions included assessing tolerance, verifying tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure care orders were obtained, transcribed and carried out for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 96). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for infection. Findings include: Resident 96 (R96) R96 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including urinary tract infection (UTI). On 09/24/2024 at 8:38 AM, R96 laid awake in bed with breakfast tray in front. Two intravenous (IV) ports were observed dangling from underneath the resident's right arm with sleeve covering the insertion site. On 09/24/2024 at 10:28 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) pulled up R96's right sleeve and removed a beige kerlix wrapped around R96's right upper arm which revealed a transparent dressing labeled 08/29/2024 PICC, a gauze pad covered the insertion site. The LPN explained PICC line dressing changes were performed weekly and as needed but there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained for the use of Oxygen (O2) and monitoring of O2 saturation for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 155), and for the use of a CPAP machine (a device used to treat sleep-related breathing disorders, such as sleep apnea, by keeping the airways open during sleep) for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 64). This deficient practice could have led to potential adverse health outcomes, including inadequate oxygenation and compromised respiratory management. Resident 155 (R155) R155 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pneumonia, respiratory tuberculosis, acute and chronic respiratory and dependence of supplemental O2. The Observation Report dated 08/28/2024, documented R155 had O2 flowing via nasal cannula and had experienced shortness of breath. On 09/24/2024 at 3:30 PM, R155 was in bed, breathing through the mouth. O2 was flowing at 5 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure annual performance appraisals were completed for 4 out of 10 sampled employees (Employees 6, 7, 9 and 10). The deficient practice placed the residents at risk for receiving substandard quality of care from certified nursing assistants (CNAs). Findings include: The Personnel Records Checklist dated 09/26/2024 revealed the following: -Employee 6 was hired as a CNA on 06/23/2022. A review of the employee's file revealed there was no annual performance evaluation completed for Employee 6 for Year 2023 and Year 2024. -Employee 7 was hired as a CNA on 07/07/2022. A review of the employee's file revealed there was no annual performance evaluation completed for Employee 7 for Year 2023 and Year 2024. - Employee 9 was hired as a CNA on 08/19/2021. A review of the employee's file revealed there was no annual performance evaluation completed for Employee 9 for Year 2022, Year 2023 and Year 2024. -Employee 10 was hired as a CNA on 11/04/2021. A review of the employee's file revealed there was no annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure stored foods were labeled and dated, food items were discarded prior to the expiration date, nourishment refrigerators were keeping the proper temperature, and safe food handling was occurring during meal service. This deficient practice posed a potential risk to safety and health standards which could lead to contamination, inadequate storage, and place residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings include: On 09/24/2024 in the morning, round scrambled egg patties were open in the walk-in cooler. These egg patties were not labeled or dated as to when the box was opened. The Food Service Manager explained the open boxed items should have been dated as to when the box was opened and then placed back in the freezer. On 09/24/2024 in the morning, one open corn muffin mix, and one unopened corn muffin mix, were being stored in the dry storage area had expired in 06/24. The Food Service Manager verified the items in the dry storage area should have been thrown away one year from the manufacturers date.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-16 · tag F0920 — pattern
    Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a dining room was not overcrowded with residents and staff members for 1 of 4 dining rooms. The deficiency practice placed the residents and staff in uncomfortable environment and at risk for accidents. Findings included: On 06/14/23 at 12:01 PM, a total of 27 residents, most of them with wheelchairs and walkers and nine employees were observed in the unit 1 dining room for the noon meal. Due to the room size, staff were observed having difficulty moving between tables to assist the residents and serve the meal. The dining room did not have a sign indicating the actual occupancy capacity. On 06/14/2023 at 12:15 PM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was assisting two residents with their meals standing in between the residents. At the next table, another CNA assisted a resident with the meal also in standing position. On 06/14/2023 at 12:30 PM, a CNA moved a resident twice from the table while eating their meal to gain access to the beverage cart that was behind the resident. The CNA apologized to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-16 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure an assessment was completed for the self-administration of medication for 2 of 35 sampled residents (R417 and R69). The deficient practice had the potential to have adverse medication side effects detrimental to the safety of the residents of the facility. Findings include: Resident #417 (R417) R417 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia, and post-traumatic stress disorder. On 06/16/23 at 11:11 AM, during medication pass observation the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) indicated R417 would keep the Advair medication in their room for self-administration. The LPN verbalized they were not aware of the resident having been previously assessed to be able to self-administer medications and was not familiar with any facility policy regarding self-administration of medications. On 06/16/23 at 11:12 AM, R417 verbalized they prefer to keep the medication in room and self-administer. R417 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was completed on splint application for the management of contractures for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident #81). The failure of the development of a resident centered care plan inhibited consistent care of the resident throughout the different care disciplines. Findings include: Resident #81 (R81) R81 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction and age-related physical debility. On 06/14/2023 at 1:25 PM, the resident was observed sleeping in bed with no hand splint. A posting on the resident's wall indicated R81 was supposed to have a right-hand splint applied. On 06/15/2023 at 1:07 PM, R81 was awake and conversive. The resident indicated the right hand splint was not being applied on daily basis. R81's physician's orders dated 02/16/2023, documented CNA to don and doff right resting hand splint after 1-5 hours of wear as tolerated. Once every morning. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 134 (R134) R134 was admitted on [DATE], with medical diagnoses to include a history of falling and diabetes mellitus type II. On 06/14/2023 at 09:29 AM, R134 complained their knee was not working correctly and requested to be seen by a physician. On 06/14/2023 at 10:04 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse 1 (LPN1) was informed R134 requested to be seen by a physician for their knee. LPN1 advised this was the first time hearing of any knee/leg concern for R134 and would follow up on the matter. On 6/16/2023 at 11:16 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse 2 (LPN2) verbalized were not aware of any recent complaints regarding R134 knee/leg. LPN2 reviewed electronic medical records and confirmed R134 had a right knee x-ray completed on 05/31/2023, with no findings, and there was documentation that a physician was recently paged for R134's knee but contact was pending. If LPN2 was waiting for a response from a physician and did not get in contact, LPN2 would follow up with the physician in two hours. As LPN2 could not confirm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure application and documentation of a splint application for two of 35 sampled residents (Resident #81 and #39). The failure of application of splints could increase resident's contractures leading to decrease mobility and increase of pain during movements. Findings include: Resident #39 (R39) R39 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease and non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. On 06/14/2023 at 3:40 PM, R39 was observed with a left hand contracture. There was no hand splint noted within the close vicinity of resident. R39 physician's order dated 02/01/2023, documented certified nurse assistants (CNA) will don/doff the left-hand roll splint to the patient for 7X/week for 3 to 4 hours. Special Instructions: CNA will apply the left resting hand splint to the patient for 7X/week for 3 to 4 hours. Once every morning at 6:00 AM. R39's comprehensive care plan with a start date of 11/08/2017, last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) dressing changes and flushes, for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #217) and failed to obtain orders for PICC line care that included flushing, dressing changes and monitoring for signs of infection or complications, for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #40). This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of complications including but not limited to catheter dislodgement, insertion site infection, phlebitis, and blood infection. Findings included: Resident #217 (R217) R217 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute infection of a stage 4 decubitus ulcer, sepsis resolved and status post urinary tract infection. On 06/14/2023 at 9:00 AM, a PICC line was observed in R217's right upper arm. The PICC line insertion site was covered with a transparent dressing dated 06/04/2023. A nursing progress note dated 06/07/2023, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order for Lidocaine patch pain medication was clarified, and the manufacturer's instructions for administration were followed as directed for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 167). This deficient practice could potentially lead to inadequate pain management, compromised therapeutic outcomes, increased discomfort, adverse reactions, undermine the overall effectiveness of the medication, hinder the resident's recovery process, and affect physical and psychosocial health. Findings include: Resident 167 (R167) R167 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including cellulitis of the right lower limb, osteomyelitis of the right tibia and fibula, joint replacement therapy, the presence of the right artificial knee joint and pain in the right lower leg. A Physician order dated 06/13/2023, documented Lidoderm 5 percent (%) patch to be applied in affected areas in the morning for osteoarthritis of the knee. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failure to ensure hemodialysis access catheter was assessed for patency for 1 of 35 sampled residents (R135). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk of complications of the AV fistula such as stenosis (abnormal narrowing of a blood vessel) that could cause problems with the quality of the hemodialysis treatment, persistent bleeding following punction and pain. Resident #135 (R135) R135 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including end stage renal disease. On 06/15/2023 at 8:13 AM, it was observed R135 had a failed arteriovenous (AV) fistula ( a connection created between an artery and a vein used as access to perform hemodialysis) at the left upper arm. On the right upper arm, R135 had an AV access and still had a pressure gauze from dialysis center from the previous day Wednesday (06/14/2023). The resident stated some nurses checked the access, but it was not consistent. A care plan dated 12/09/2022, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Nicotine patch was timely delivered and available as ordered following the resident's admission for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 167). This deficient practice could potentially lead to negative health outcomes, hinder smoking cessation efforts, compromise overall well-being and quality of life, increase nicotine cravings, exacerbate withdrawal symptoms, impede the resident's progress towards a smoke-free lifestyle and adversely affect their physical health. Findings include: Resident 167 (R167) R167 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, anemia, cellulitis of the right lower limb, joint replacement therapy and pain in the right lower leg. The Brief Interview of Mental Status dated 06/16/2023, documented a score of 15/15, which indicated R167's cognitive status was intact. On 06/15/2023 at 11:16 AM, R167 was in bed, verbally alert and oriented times four. R167 indicated was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure (1) an open med cart was not left unattended for 1 of 6 med carts, (2) medication was not left at bedside (R69 and R127), and (3) monitoring of temperature for medication refrigerator and room was completed, and medical supplies for residents were properly disposed. Findings include: 1) On [DATE] at 8:50 AM, a medication cart parked in between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was observed with an open lock. The nurse was nowhere in the vicinity of the opened medication cart. At 8:58 AM, a non-clinical staff member was observed to pass the medication cart. At 9:08 AM, a certified nursing assistant was observed to pass the medication cart. At 9:12 AM, a licensed practical nurse (LPN) returned to the cart and confirmed the medication cart was unlocked and was unattended. The LPN indicated medications carts should always be kept locked to ensure the security of the stored medications especially narcotic medications. On [DATE] at 10:45 AM, an LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VALLEY WEST HEALTH — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HENDERSON NV OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 04/17/2025
ISKEB 2024 TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/17/2025
NBH BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 04/17/2025
RAMI, ISAACIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/17/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.3M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 3%Other / private 20%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$331per resident / day
operating cost
$10,051per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$324per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nevada Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nevada
$11,786/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,463/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,241/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 295041. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next