No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kinzua Nursing And Rehab

205 Water Street, Warren, PA 16365 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 106 certified beds · (814) 726-0820 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 immediate-jeopardy citation$145,181 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $145,181 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-26)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2 W Crescent Park · (814) 406-0035 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
100 Market St · (814) 726-1914 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
74 Market St · (814) 726-3660 · Call to confirm hours
Park
219 Conewango Ave · (814) 723-6300 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased28.6%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.2%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.7%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.7%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened26.3%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.3%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.5%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.2%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.9%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.2%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine73.5%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.6%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.6%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.461.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.861.181.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 119 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
14.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.52U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.3%CMS range 38.1–56.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF14.0%CMS range 10.7–19.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge47.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.6–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.28
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
48.9%
Total nursing turnover
83.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 81.0 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-11)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Pennsylvania Code Title 49. Professional and Vocational Standards, facility policies, facility job description, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow nursing standards of practice to ensure admission medications are transcribed accurately for one of one residents reviewed (Resident R1). The facility's failure created a situation which placed the residents in Immediate Jeopardy of the likelihood of serious bodily injury, harm, or death for Resident R1.Findings include: Review of Pennsylvania Code Title 49. Professional and Vocational Standards 21.11. General functions of the Registered Nurse (RN) (a)(4) stated, Carries out nursing care actions which promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals and (b) The RN is fully responsible for all actions as a licensed nurse and is accountable to clients for the quality of care delivered and (d) The Board recognizes standards of practice and professional codes of behavior, as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and facility documents, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and treatment according to the resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan, and address provider recommendations for psychiatric medication changes for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R2).Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Consulting Physician/Practitioner Orders dated 12/09/25, indicated that the attending physician shall authenticate orders for the care and treatment of assigned residents. For consulting physician/practitioner orders received in writing or via fax, the nurse in a timely manner will:Call the attending physician to verify the order.Document the verification order by entering the order, time, date, and signature on the physician order sheet.Resident R2's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/03/26, with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, alcohol abuse, and anxiety disorder. A care plan entitled at risk for adverse effects related to use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for one resident receiving a psychotic (mind altering) medication (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of Pennsylvania Code Title 49. Professional and Vocational Standards 21.11. General functions of the Registered Nurse (RN) (a)(4) stated, Carries out nursing care actions which promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals and (b) The RN is fully responsible for all actions as a licensed nurse and is accountable to clients for the quality of care delivered and (d) The Board recognizes standards of practice and professional codes of behavior, as developed by appropriate nursing associations, as the criteria for assuring safe and effective practice. Review of a facility policy entitled Medication and Treatment Orders dated 12/9/25, indicated Clarify the order and transcribe newly prescribed medications. on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). record or ensure the order is in the electronic MAR. and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and job descriptions, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to effectively manage the facility to make certain that admission medications are transcribed accurately.Findings include: The job description for the NHA revealed that the NHA's primary purpose is to supervise clinical and administrative affairs of nursing homes and related facilities. Duties of the nursing home administrator include overseeing staff, personal, financial matters, medical care, medical supplies, and facilities. The job description for the DON revealed that the DON's primary purpose is to provide expert professional knowledge and skills necessary to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operations of the Clinical Department in accordance with all current regulatory standards to ensure the highest degree of quality care. Based on the findings in this report that identified the facility failed to make certain that admission medications are transcribed accurately, the NHA and the DON failed to fulfill…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician orders, residents' Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a legal document specifying the resident/responsible party choices regarding life-sustaining treatments), electronic health record (EHR), and paper charts were consistent for two of 18 residents reviewed (Residents R9 and R52).Findings include: The facility policy entitled Advance Directives dated [DATE], indicated that The plan of care for each resident will be consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/or advance directive.The Director of Nursing (DON) or designee will notify the Attending Physician of advance directives so that the appropriate orders can be documented in the resident's medical record and plan of care. Resident R9's clinical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side (paralysis on one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of resident care needs) User's Manual, clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment after a significant change in condition for one of two residents reviewed receiving hospice services (Resident R49).Findings include: Review of the MDS User's Manual revealed that a significant change in status assessment is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program and remains a resident at the nursing home. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) must be within 14-days from effective date of the hospice election. Resident R49's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/27/23, with diagnoses that included dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), hypertension (high blood pressure), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Further review of clinical record revealed a hospice contract to admit Resident R49 to hospice services on 7/30/25. Review of Resident R49's MDS's lacked evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to utilize infection control practices regarding Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs-additional infection control precautions put in place for individuals who have an increased risk of multi-drug resident organisms [MDROs] or who are colonized/infected with MDROs) for wound care for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R12). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 10/16/25, indicated EBPs are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO). It also indicated that gloves and gown are to be applied prior to performing the high contact resident care activities, which included wound care. Resident R12's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/12/25, with diagnoses that included pressure ulcer of the sacral region stage 3 (wound involving full-thickness skin loss where the subcutaneous fat is visible), obstructive and reflux uropathy (complication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete documentation for four of twelve residents reviewed (Residents R2, R3, R7 and R11) Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Death of a Resident, Documentation, dated [DATE], indicated appropriate documentation shall be made in the clinical records concerning the death of a resident and that all information pertaining to a resident's death (i.e. date, time of death, name and title of individual pronouncing the resident dead, etc.) must be recorded in the nurse's notes. The policy further stated that the name of the mortician and person removing the deceased resident must be entered into the resident's medical record. Review of facility policy entitled Documentation of Wound Treatments, dated [DATE], indicated the facility completes accurate documentation of wound assessments and treatments and the wound treatments are documented at the time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a bath/shower per resident preference and failed to ensure that residents received assistance with bathing for two of 12 residents reviewed (Residents R3 and R4). Review of facility policy entitled Bed Bath, Shower/Tub dated 12/2/24, indicated The purpose of this procedure are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident. and Documentation 1. The date and time the shower/tub or bed bath was performed. 2. The name and title of the individual(s) who assisted the resident with the shower/tub or bed bath. Review of Resident R3's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/4/25, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (when your lungs do not have adequate air flow) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R3's physician's orders dated 4/8/25, revealed an order for shower every Wednesday and Saturday on evening shift. Review of Resident R3's task (an area where the nursing assistants…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to take appropriate timely action to obtain a medication for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident R1).Review of a facility policy entitled Administering Medication dated 12/2/24, indicated medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, as prescribed. Review of a facility policy entitled Medications Ordering and Receiving from Pharmacy dated 12/2/24, indicated medications and related products are received from the dispensing pharmacy on a timely basis. Review of facility policy entitled Medication orders dated 12/2/24, indicated a verbal prescription for a scheduled II medication may be called in to a pharmacist directly by the prescriber. The supply can be delivered from the pharmacy or may be available from the emergency kit. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 6/23/25, with diagnoses that included encounter for palliative care (care and comfort measures), hypertension (high blood pressure), and dementia (a disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medication was obtained and provided as ordered by the physician for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident R2). Review of facility policy entitled Administering Medications dated 12/2/24, indicated Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Review of facility policy entitled Medication Orders dated 12/2/24, indicated The prescriber is contacted by nursing for directions when delivery of a medication will be delayed, or the medication is not or will not be available. Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/8/25, with diagnoses that included diabetes (a health condition that caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), hypertension (high blood pressure), and Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (a condition when stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into your throat). Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed a physician's order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-24 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee credentials, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the employee designated as the full-time director of food and nutrition services, who was not a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutritional professional, received frequently scheduled consultations from a qualified dietitian and/or failed to employ a full-time qualified dietitian since 1/7/25. Findings include: Review of the employee file/credentials the facility designated as the director of food and nutrition services revealed that he/she lacked the appropriate competencies and skills to function as the director to include any of the following: a certification for food service manager or a similar national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying body or an associate's or higher degree in food service management or in hospitality or lacked two or more years experience in the position of food safety and completed a course study in food safety and management. There was no evidence that the facility had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, job description, and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately and consistently assess a resident's nutritional status on admission and as needed thereafter and failed to complete a comprehensive nutritional assessment on a resident identified as being at risk for unplanned weight loss and/or compromised nutritional status for 27 of 85 Residents reviewed (Residents R1, R10, R11, R15, R20, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R30, R31, R32, R33, R34, R35, R36, R37, R38, R39, R40, R41, R42, and R43) Findings include: Review of facility policy dated 12/2/24, entitled Nutritional Management revealed the facility provides care and services to each resident to ensure the resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status (refers to the factors that reflect that an individual's nutritional status (includes both nutrition and hydration) is adequate, relative to his/her overall condition and prognosis, such as weight, food/fluid intake, and pertinent laboratory values) in the context of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day) upon or within twenty-four hours of transfer for two of two residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents R11 and R12). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Bed-Holds and Return dated 12/2/24, indicated that prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, that residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy. Resident R11's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/31/25, with diagnoses that included dementia (loss of cognitive functioning affecting a persons memory and behaviors), flu, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (a condition where stomach acid flows back into the esophagus [tube that passes food from the mouth into the stomach]). Record review revealed that Resident R11 was transferred to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of 15 Residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy dated 12/2/24, entitled Comprehensive Assessment and The Care Delivery Process indicated that a comprehensive assessment will be conducted to assist in developing person-centered care plans. It also indicated to identify current interventions and treatments and link these to problems and diagnosis they are to be treating. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/8/25, with diagnoses that included high blood pressure, pneumonia, and pressure ulcer (damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue that usually occurs over a bony prominence) to his/her right heel and sacrum that is unstageable (when the bottom of the pressure ulcer is covered in slough [debris that appears tan, yellow, green or brown in color] and/or eschar [hard plaque that's tan, brown, or black in color]. Resident R1's clinical record revealed a progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and/or revise resident care plans for seven of 15 residents reviewed (Residents R9, R10, R8, R15, R16, R20, and R22). Findings include: Review of facility policy dated 12/2/24, entitled Comprehensive Assessment and The Care Delivery Process indicated that comprehensive assessments, care planning, and the care delivery process involves collecting and analyzing information, choosing and initiating interventions, and then monitoring results and adjusting interventions. Resident R9's clinical record revealed an admission date of 2/2/08, with diagnoses that included diabetes (a health condition caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), high blood pressure, and anxiety. Review of Resident R9's comprehensive care plan on 3/17/25, revealed that of the 39 care plans present, 37 had an outstanding target date of 2/28/25. The care plans included the problem categories of: skin breakdown related to rash, ADL [activities of daily living] care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, facility policies and documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate safety measures were implemented related to wheelchair transport and fall precautions for two of four residents reviewed for falls (Residents R13 and R14). Findings include: The facility was not able to provide a policy for staff to reference in the safe utilization of footrests while transporting residents via wheelchair. A facility policy entitled, Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, revised March 2018, indicated that Position-change alarms will not be used as the primary or sole intervention to prevent falls, but rather will be used to assist the staff in identifying patterns and routines of the resident. The use of alarms will be monitored for efficacy and staff will respond to alarms in a timely manner. Resident R13's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/28/24, with diagnoses that included stroke, unsteady on feet, Parkinson's Disease (degenerative brain condition, meaning it causes parts of your brain to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to comprehensively address the formulation of advance directives (legal instructions regarding your preferences for medical care if you are unable to make decisions for yourself-to include information provided oral and/or written instructions about future medical care in the event of becoming unable to express medical wishes) for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents R4 and R36). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Advanced Directives dated [DATE], indicated the following: -upon admission the resident and/or representative will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an Advanced Directive if he or she chooses to do so. - prior to or upon admission the Social Services Director or designee will inquire of the resident, his/her family members and/or his or her legal representative about the existence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for three of 24 residents reviewed (Residents R17, Resident R65, and Resident R69). Findings include: Resident R69's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/24/24, with diagnoses that included stroke, breast cancer, and high blood pressure. Resident R69's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 10/31/24, for a left arm sling to be worn at all times except for hygiene purposes. There was also an order dated 11/20/24, for a soft cervical (neck) collar to be applied when out of bed, in wheelchair for cervical support and improved posture, may remove for eating. Observation of Resident R69 on 12/03/24, at approximately 10:47 a.m. revealed he/she was sitting in a wheelchair without a left arm sling or soft cervical collar. Observation of Resident R69 on 12/04/24, at approximately 9:20 a.m. revealed he/she was sitting in a wheelchair without a left arm sling or soft cervical collar. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one of two residents reviewed for range of motion (Resident R65). Findings include: Review of Resident R65's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/23, with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (a condition where a person is paralyzed and unable to move one side of their body), Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (a condition when stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into your throat), and Hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R65's Occupational Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed a long term goal that include: patient will safely wear a resting hand splint on left hand for up to eight hours with minimal signs or symptoms of redness, swelling, discomfort or pain. Observation made on 12/02/24, at 3:10 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate care regarding a urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a bag) for three of five residents reviewed for catheters (Residents R1, R5, and R11) Findings include: A facility policy entitled Suprapubic Catheter Replacement dated 12/02/24, indicated that the date and time of the procedure, name of individual performing the procedure, and signature and title of the person completing the procedure should be recorded in the resident's medical record. A facility policy entitled Catheter Care, Urinary dated 12/02/24, indicated Maintain Unobstructed Urine Flow 3. The urinary drainage bag must be held or positioned lower than the bladder at all times . and Infection Control 2. b. Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/22/22, with diagnoses that included obstructive and reflux uropathy (occurs when the urine flow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label multi-dose containers of insulin (medication to treat elevated blood sugar levels) with the date they were opened and discard an opened multi-dose vial of insulin in a timely manner in two of three medication carts (Gold and Red Units) and discard an opened multi-dose vial of Tuberculin solution (solution used to test for the disease tuberculosis) in one of three medication storage rooms (Red Unit). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Insulin Administration dated [DATE], indicated that staff are to check the expiration date, if drawing from an opened multi-dose vial; if opening a new vial, record expiration date and time on the vial (follow manufacturer recommendations for expiration after opening. A facility policy entitled, Storage of Medications dated [DATE], indicated when the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary operations and standards for food safety in the main kitchen and in one pantry reviewed (Gold Pantry). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Food Receiving and Storage dated 12/02/24, indicated that Dry food that are stored in bins are removed from original packaging, labeled and dated (use by date). Food and snacks kept on the nursing units. 1. All food items to be kept at or below 41 F [Fahrenheit] are placed in the refrigerator . and labeled with a use by date. 3. Refrigerators . are monitored for temperature according to state specific guidelines. Additional document entitled Food Storage Guide revealed that bakery items including, muffins/pastries/donuts-once opened expires in one week and prepared foods/leftover items, once opened expires in 3 days. Review of facility policy entitled Food Brought by Family/Visitors dated 12/02/24, revealed that 'food brought in by family/visitors that is left with resident to consume later will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies and documents, and staff, resident, and visitor interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a clean environment in one resident room (520) and clean equipment for one resident (Resident R37). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Quality of Life-Homelike Environment dated 12/02/24, indicated facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting and include a clean, sanitary, and orderly environment. A facility document entitled Daily Resident/Patient Room Cleaning indicated that resident room floors would be dust mopped, all trash and debris will be swept to the door and picked up with a dustpan. Observation on 12/02/24, at 12:09 p.m. of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed an open bag of cheese curls, two full 20-ounce plastic bottles of Diet Coke and one empty 20-ounce plastic bottle of Diet Coke on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the provision of oxygen therapy for one of one residents reviewed for respiratory services (Resident R26). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Oxygen Administration dated 12/02/24, indicated to verify that there is a physician's order for oxygen administration. Resident R26's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/06/24, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a condition that prevents airflow to the lungs resulting in difficulty breathing), dementia (loss of cognitive functioning affecting a persons memory and behaviors), and high blood pressure. Observations on 12/02/24, at 1:45 p.m., 12/03/24, at 11:16 a.m., and 12/03/24, at 12:08 p.m. revealed Resident R26 wearing an oxygen nasal cannula (a thin tube with two prongs that fits into the resident's nostrils to deliver oxygen) connected to an oxygen concentrator delivering 2 liters per minute. Resident R26's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary resident shower room in one of two shower rooms (Red shower room). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Daily Resident/Patient Room Cleaning dated 1/16/24, indicated Wall and Handrail Cleaning Ceramic tile walls Procedure: Wet the wall with clean water, apply quaternary disinfectant on the wall with a rag, then scrub down the wall with the scrub pad and use the grout brush to clean in between the tiles. Observation on 8/20/24, at 11:00 a.m. of the Red shower room revealed a black substance between the white ceramic tiles on the shower room walls and a gray substance covering the surface of the ceramic tiles on the wall closest to the floor. During an interview with Housekeeper Employee E1 on 8/20/24, at 11:00 a.m. he/she revealed that he/she was unsure when the shower room was last cleaned. The facility was unable to provide evidence when the Red shower room was last cleaned. During an interview with the Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party of a change in condition for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Change in Resident's Condition or Status last reviewed 1/16/24, indicated that the facility must inform the resident's representative, or family member when there is a Significant Change an example of which was the development of Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss) skin breakdown. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/06/2018, with diagnoses that included Dementia, Type II Diabetes (condition of improper blood sugar control), Heart Failure and Pain. Review of an admission / re-admission Evaluation form dated 1/03/24, documented that Resident R1 had newly developed a Stage 2 open area around the coccyx area. There was no further documentation to indicate that Resident R1's responsible party was notified of these areas of skin breakdown. During an interview on 3/06/24, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to promote self-determination through the support of resident choices about aspects of their lives that were identified as important for five of 24 residents reviewed (Residents R14, R37, R40, R82, and R186). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Dining and Food Preferences dated 1/16/24, indicated the following: - licensed nurse will notify the dining services department of food allergies upon admission and prior to any meals served. - Dining Services Director or designee will interview the resident/representative to complete a Food Preference Interview within 48 hours (two days) of admission. - Food Preference Interview will be entered into the medical record. -Food allergies, food intolerances, food dislikes, and food and fluid preferences will be entered into the resident profile menu management software system. - individual tray assembly ticket will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with standards for food safety in one of three stand up refrigerators and one of one dry storage areas reviewed in the kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Food Receiving and Storage dated 1/16/24, indicated Dry foods that are stored . labeled and dated use by date. Such foods are rotated using a first in first out system and Refrigerated foods are labeled dated and monitored so they are used by their use by date, frozen or discarded. Observation during kitchen tour on 1/23/24, at 11:35 a.m. revealed an open half used container of parsley flakes with an open date of 11/9/21, a use by date of 11/9/23, and a manufacturer best by date of 9/19/22. Further observations revealed three unshelled hardboiled eggs in the refrigerator with a use by date of 1/22/23, and ten cans of tomato soup with a manufacturer's expiration date of 1/17/24. During an interview with the Dietary Manager on 1/23/24, at 11:43 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident was offered the opportunity to participate in the development, review, and/or revision of their person-centered care plan for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents R29 and R73). Findings include: Review of facility policy dated 1/16/24, entitled, Resident Participation - Assessment/Care Plan indicated: - the resident and his or her representative have the right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her care plan. - the resident and his/her legal representative are encouraged to attend and participate in development of the resident's person-centered care plan. - the care planning process will facilitate the inclusion of the resident and/or representative. - a seven (7) day advance notice of the care planning conference is provided to the resident and/or representative - the Social Services Director or designee is responsible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day) upon transfer for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents R8 and R19). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Bed holds and Returns dated 1/16/24, indicated that All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies . regardless of payor source . at the time of transfer . Review of Resident R8's clinical record revealed an initial admission date of 9/8/23, with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis (an infection in the bone), diabetes (a disease that cause high blood sugars due to the body not releasing enough insulin), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R8's clinical record revealed progress notes dated 9/26/23, at 6:05 p.m. and 12/1/23, at 3:16 p.m. indicating transfers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans timely and to reflect the current necessary care and services for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident R66). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Care Plans,Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 1/16/24, indicated that the care plan is reviewed and updated with clinical changes. Review of Resident R66's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/2/21, with diagnoses that included dementia (brain disorder that slowly destroys memory, thinking skills, and, over time the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), pain and weakness. Review of Resident R66's nutrional care plan revealed that the diet was a regular diet/ mechanical soft texture with a revision date of 11/20/23. The care plan also identified that the last review or revision date was 1/24/24. Review of Resident R66's physcian's orders dated 11/17/23, revealed an order for a regular diet mechanical soft,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the provision of oxygen therapy for one of one residents reviewed for respiratory services (Resident R286). Findings include: Review of a facility policy dated 1/16/24, entitled, Oxygen Administration indicated to verify that there is a physician's order for procedure. Resident R286's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/15/24, with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), fractured hip, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Observations on 1/23/24, at 2:10 p.m. and on 1/26/24 at 8:38 a.m. revealed Resident R286 wearing an oxygen nasal canula (a thin tube with two prongs that fits into the resident's nostrils to deliver oxygen) connected to an oxygen concentrator delivering 3 liters per minute (lpm - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement all safety measures related to following all care planned fall precautions for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Perineal [area of the pelvic cavity where incontinence care is provided] Care Policy revealed that the first step by staff is to review a resident's care plan for any special needs of the resident. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/09/23, with diagnoses that included age related osteoporosis (condition of bone deterioriation), general weakness, pain, and abnormal walking. Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of resident care needs), dated 10/31/23, indicated that Resident R1 is dependent on staff for daily functions such as toileting, hygiene and bathing/washing self. Review of Resident R1's care plan for risk for falls initiated on 11/11/23, revealed the intervention to provide extensive assist of two staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$145,181 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $145,181 — penalty dated 2026-02-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VALLEY WEST HEALTH — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WESTERN PA OPCO HOLDINGS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 10/29/2024
VALLEY WEST HEALTH LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/15/2024
FRANCO, AHARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/29/2024
RAMI, ISAACIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/29/2024
BEVERLY ENTERPRISES - PENNSYLVANIA, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
BEVERLY ENTERPRISES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
BEVERLY HEALTH AND REHABILITIATION SERVICES, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
DRUMM INTERMEDIARY SUB CO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
DRUMM MERGER COOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
DRUMM MERGER CO SUB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
FILLMORE STRATEGIC INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
GEARY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
GPH WARREN KINZUA VALLEY LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
ISKEB WESTERN PA LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
KEYSTONE VENTURES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
PEARL SENIOR CARE, LLC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
WASHINGTON STATE INVESTMENT BOARDOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
ANDREWS, HEATHERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
CHASE, ANDREWIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
ENDRES, JAYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
FINN, NICHOLASIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
LINAM, KIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
LUCKS, KARENIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024
MILLER, JEANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/15/2024
RASMUSSEN-JONES, HOLLYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-26.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 7%Other / private 17%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$352per resident / day
operating cost
$10,710per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$278per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395363. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next