William Penn Nursing And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 118 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 116.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (Residents 63 and 79).Findings include:The facility's medication error rate was 12 percent based on 25 medication opportunities with three medication errors.Observation on April 17, 2026, of Resident 79's medication administration at 8:28 AM revealed that Employee 3, licensed practical nurse, administered one 20 mg (milligram) tablet of Lasix (a diuretic medication used to treat fluid retention). Clinical record review for Resident 79 revealed a physician order dated April 6, 2026, stating, Furosemide 20 MG Tablet TAKE THREE TABLETS (60MG) BY MOUTH ONCE DAILY RELATED TO EDEMA, UNSPECIFIED. Concurrent observation of Resident 79's medication administration revealed that Employee 3 administered two tablets of Potassium Chloride Crys ER (Extended Release) Oral 20 MEQ (milliequivalent), and broke both tablets in half prior to administration. The medication reference Drugs.com (a comprehensive and widely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items in a safe and sanitary manner and maintain equipment in a sanitary condition, in the facility's main kitchen. Findings include: Initial tour of the facility's main kitchen with Employee 1, dietitian, on April 14, 2026, at 10:12 AM revealed the following: The wall mounted soap dispenser located adjacent to the handwashing sink was coming off the wall. The walk-in freezer contained a box of bagged broccoli cuts and lima beans that were open to the ambient air. The spice rack contained the following outdated containers of spices: ground all spice with a use by date of July 19, 2024; rosemary with a written use by date of September 19, 2024; thyme with a use by date of March 6, 2025. The dry goods storage area contained a container of whole bay leaves with a written use by date of December 20, 2024. There was a bent adaptive piece of silverware in a drawer on the table that held the coffee machine. The piece of silverware had a discolored piece of scotch tape on the handle. Employee…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate transmission-based precautions (TBP) for two of three residents reviewed on TBP (Residents 127 and 129).Findings include: The facility policy entitled Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions, last reviewed without changes on March 19, 2026, revealed it is the facility policy to take appropriate precautions to prevent transmission of pathogens, based on pathogens' modes of transmission. Contact precautions refer to measures that are intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents which are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident, or the resident's environment. Facility staff will apply transmission-based precautions, in addition to standard precautions, to residents who are known or suspected to be infected or colonized with certain infectious agents requiring additional controls to prevent transmission. The category of transmission-based precautions will determine the type of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected a resident's status for one of 23 residents reviewed (99).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 99 revealed a MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated February 21, 2026, that facility staff assessed Resident 99 as receiving an anticoagulant medication during the last seven days in the assessment period. Further clinical record review revealed no evidence that Resident 99 received an anticoagulant medication during the assessment period for the MDS noted above.Interview with the Director of Nursing on April 16, 2026, at 2:07 PM confirmed that Resident 99's February 21, 2026, MDS was coded in error regarding receiving an anticoagulant medication. 483.20(g) Accuracy of AssessmentsPreviously cited 5/9/25 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f)(ix) Medical records28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for infection control concerns for two of 23 residents reviewed (Residents 127 and 128).Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 127 on April 5, 2026. A physician order dated April 5, 2026, revealed staff were to initiate contact precautions (measures to prevent the spread of infections transmitted by direct/indirect contact with a resident or their environment) for Resident 127 for VRE (vancomycin resistant enterococci, a type of bacteria resistant to the antibiotic vancomycin) in her foot wound. Further review of Resident 127's clinical record revealed her care plan-initiated April 5, 2026, listed infection of and was blank after. The care plan noted staff were to maintain isolation precautions as indicated but did not specify what. Clinical record revealed the facility admitted Resident 128 on April 5, 2026. A physician order dated April 6, 2026, revealed staff were to initiate contact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the highest practical care related to PICC lines (peripherally inserted central catheter, provides access to the large veins near the heart by inserting a thin flexible tube into a vein the upper arm) for two of 23 residents reviewed (Residents 127 and 128). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 128 on April 5, 2026. Nursing documentation dated April 6, 2026, at 4:48 PM, revealed Resident 128 stated, he wanted a pair knife to cut his line. Documentation revealed Resident 128 then tried to pull at his PICC line. Further review of Resident 128's clinical record revealed a physician order dated April 5, 2026, for staff to maintain an emergency kit for Resident 128's PICC line at his bedside. Observation of Resident 128's room on April 14, 2026, at 1:05 PM revealed there was no emergency kit visible in his room. Further observation on April 15, 2026, at 10:02 AM, revealed a small bag of gauze in his top dresser drawer under his personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the availability of necessary emergency supplies and provide care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one resident reviewed receiving hemodialysis (Resident 10).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 10 revealed a diagnosis list that included the following related to hemodialysis (a machine that performs a basic function of the kidney by cleansing the blood of impurities): end stage renal disease, chronic kidney disease, and an arteriovenous (AV) fistula (surgically created connection between an artery and a vein to provide an access for hemodialysis). Review of the current physician orders for Resident 10 revealed the following: An order dated August 24, 2025, noted, dialysis precautions: no blood draws, injections, or blood pressure from (specify) arm. Emergency kit at bedside containing appropriate equipment; tourniquet, sterile gauze, gloves, etc. Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide recommended pneumococcal immunizations for one of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident 3).Findings include: The facility policy entitled Pneumococcal Vaccine, last reviewed without changes revealed March 19, 2026, revealed it is the facility policy to offer residents and staff immunization against pneumococcal disease in accordance with current CDC guidelines and recommendations. Each resident will be assessed for pneumococcal immunizations upon admission. Each resident will be offered a pneumococcal immunization unless it is contraindicated, or the resident has already been immunized, the type of pneumococcal vaccine (PCV15, PCV20, PCV21, or PPSV23) offered will depend upon the recipient's age, having certain risk conditions, and previously received pneumococcal vaccines, in accordance with current CDC guidelines and recommendations. Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 3 on December…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected residents' status for six of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 14, 20, 71, 75, and 81). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 75 revealed a Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated February 2, 2025. The facility staff assessed the resident as taking an anticoagulant (a medication that prevents or reduces clotting time of the blood). Further clinical record review revealed no evidence that Resident 75 was on an anticoagulant. An interview with Employee 2, registered nurse assessment coordinator (RNAC), on May 7, 2025, at 10:50 AM confirmed that Resident 75 was not on an anticoagulant during the assessment period, and this was marked in error on the MDS. The Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing were informed of the above findings during a meeting on May 7, 2025, at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assist residents to obtain routine dental care for six of eight residents reviewed (Residents 34, 50, 95, 4, 20, and 37). Findings include: Observation of Resident 34 on May 7, 2025, at 10:23 AM revealed that she had some natural teeth. Resident 34 was unable to be interviewed due to her current cognitive status. Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 34 on January 8, 2018, with payment sources that included the state Medicaid benefit. Further review of Resident 34's clinical record revealed that she last saw a dentist on February 13, 2020. An interview with Employee 1 (licensed practical nurse) on May 8, 2025, at 11:34 AM confirmed these findings for Resident 34. There was no other documentation that indicated Resident 34 was offered routine dental services every six months as the State plan allows. Observation and interview with Resident 50 on May 6, 2025, at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VALLEY WEST HEALTH — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA