Richland Nursing And Rehab
349 Votech Drive, Johnstown, PA 15904 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 97 certified beds · (814) 266-9702 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.1% | 16.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.8% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.7% | 17.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.0% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.5% | 93.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.6% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.1% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.3% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.2% | 68.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.6% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.6% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.65 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.60 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.7%CMS range 33.1–54.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.2–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 66.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.4%CMS range 5.8–15.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 85.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure that dietary staff wore appropriate hair coverings while preparing residents' food, and failing to monitor food temperatures in the kitchen. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding the use of hair restraints, dated November 26, 2025 revealed that dietary staff must wear hair nets or caps and/or beard restraints when cooking, preparing or assembling food as a preventive measure against the spread of illness and to prevent hair from contacting exposed food. Observations in the main kitchen on April 27, 2026, at 11:32 a.m., revealed that the Dietary [NAME] was plating corn and placing beef on soft tortilla shells to make quesadillas for the lunch meal. Observations at this time revealed that he had a beard but was not wearing a beard restraint.The facility's policy regarding recording food temperatures, dated November 26, 2025, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure timely medication administration per physician's orders, and failed to notify the physician that a medication was available for administration per physician's orders resulting in a delay in treatment for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include: A facility policy regarding medication administration, dated November 26, 2025, indicated that medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 6, dated April 20, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, was frequently incontinent of bowel, and had a diagnosis of unspecified diarrhea. A nursing note for Resident 6, dated April 23, 2026, at 2:36 p.m. indicated that stool…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's care plan reflected the resident's specific care needs for two of 35 residents (Resident 2 and Resident 61). Findings Include:A facility policy for comprehensive care plans, dated November 26, 2025, indicated that it is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and all services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality. The comprehensive care plan will describe individualized interventions for trauma survivors that recognizes the interrelation between trauma and symptoms of trauma, as indicated. Trigger-specific interventions will be used to identify ways to decrease the resident's exposure to triggers which re-traumatize the resident,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 80). Findings include: A facility policy for Medication Administration, dated November 26, 2025, indicated that medications will me administered as per the the physicians orders. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 80, dated January 17, 2026, revealed that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, had clear speech, understood and understands and had diagnoses that included heart disease and high blood pressure, and on May 13, 2025, was originally ordered 5 milligrams (mg) Lisinopril (a medication to treat high blood pressure) one time a day. A nursing note for Resident 80, dated October 8, 2025, at 12:07 p.m. indicated that the resident had an episode of dizziness and a blood pressure of 92/60 millimeters of mercury (mm/Hg). Physician's orders for Resident 80, dated October 9, 2025, included an order for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received proper care for an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted and held in the bladder to drain urine) for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 94). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding urinary catheter care, dated November 26, 2025, indicated that the purpose of this policy was to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. General guidelines related to infection control indicated to make sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag were kept off the floor. An admission note for Resident 94, dated January 27, 2026, indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility for a three-day respite stay. A care plan for the resident, dated January 28, 2026, indicated that the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter related to urinary retention. Physician's orders for Resident 94, dated January 28, 2026, included an order for the resident to have an indwelling urinary catheter due…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were assessed and received trauma-informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers for residents with the diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event) for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings include: Trauma informed care policy dated November 26, 2025, revealed that the facility will deliver care and services which, in addition to meeting professional standards, are delivered using approaches which are culturally competent and account for experiences and preferences, and address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated December 12, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia and PTSD. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and medication package inserts, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label multi-dose containers of medications with the date they were opened in one of two medication carts reviewed (C hall cart).The facility's policies regarding medication storage and disposal, dated November 26, 2025, revealed that the facility would properly date medication vials after they were opened. An undated package insert for Degludec (a diabetic medication) revealed that it should be used within 56 days upon opening. An undated package insert for NovoLog (a diabetic medication) revealed that the medication should be used within 28 days of opening. An undated package inserts for Humalog Kwikpen (a diabetic medication) revealed that it should be used after 28 days of opening.Observations in the C Hall cart on January 28, 2026, at 9:54 a.m. revealed that there was an 100 unit/ml Humalog Kwik Pen for Resident 31 open and undated, a 100 unit/ml Novolog Flex Pen and a 100 unit/ml Degludec FlexTouch pen for Resident 94…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, and clinical records, as well as observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff provided assistive devices to assist with eating in accordance with physician's orders for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 63). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding assistive devices and equipment, dated November 26, 2025, revealed thatcertain devices and equipment that assist with resident mobility, safety and independence are provided for residents. These may include specialized eating utensils and equipment. Recommendations for the use of devices and equipment are based on the comprehensive assessment and documented in the resident care plan. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 63, dated November 25, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required set-up assistance with eating, had limited range of motion to his upper extremity on one side, and had a diagnosis of monoplegia (paralysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Observations of the walk-in cooler on January 28, 2026, at 9:42 a.m. revealed one quarter bushel of moldy cucumbers. Observations of the walk-in freezer on January 28, 2026, at 9:40 a.m. revealed that there was half of a box of Tony's pizzas, half of a bag of chicken tenders, one box of breadsticks that were opened, undated and exposed to the air. Observations of the small refrigerator in the kitchen on January 28, 2026, at 9:47 a.m. revealed half of a container of heavy whipping cream that was opened and undated. Observations of the residents' refrigerator on January 28, 2026, at 9:53 a.m. revealed half of a container of soup that was undated, with a brown and white removable substance around the lid. Interview with the Dietary Director on January 28, 2026, at 9:53 a.m. confirmed that food should be dated when it is opened and should be properly sealed for storage, and that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to follow physician's orders for one of 4 residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated November 21, 2024, revealed that medications were to be administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. A admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated July 10 2025, revealed that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, sometimes understood, required extensive assistance for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure, heart attack, stroke, myasthenia gravis (weakness of muscles) and dementia. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated July 9, 2025, included an order for Rivastigmine (Exelon) Transdermal Patch (a medicated patch used to treat dementia)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that oxygen was provided as ordered by the physician for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding oxygen use, dated May 8, 2024, indicated that the facility was to verify the physician's order and provide safe oxygen administration. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated November 20, 2024, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired and received oxygen. A care plan, dated November 27, 2024, revealed that Resident 3 was at risk for respiratory impairment related to congestive heart failure (CHF) and had a history of pneumonia. Physician's orders, dated November 30, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive oxygen at zero to four liters per minute (lpm) every shift to maintain an oxygen saturation (measurement of the percentage of oxygen-rich hemoglobin in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of planned, written menus, and recipes, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their pre-approved planned menu and recipes. Findings included: Review of the posted menus for the lunch meal on Thursday, December 19, 2024, revealed that residents were to receive chicken vegetable stew, spaghetti noodles, dinner roll, pineapple tidbits with cream, two-percent milk, coffee/tea, and margarine. A facility recipe card for chicken and vegetable stew, dated September 6, 2015, indicated that the chicken and vegetable stew contained the following 19 ingredients: fully cooked 1/2-inch diced chicken that was 80 percent dark and 20 percent white, chopped ham, chicken broth, baby lima beans, corn, crushed tomatoes, diced celery, chopped onions, minced garlic, ketchup, red wine vinegar, sugar, Worcestershire sauce, paprika; marjoram, pepper, salt, hot sauce, and margarine. Observations on December 19, 2024, at 11:46 a.m. during the lunch tray delivery revealed that the residents received a bowl containing the spaghetti…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and resident's representative in writing of the transfer and reason for hospitalization for six of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 9, 28, 36, 37, 43, 62). Findings include: A nursing note for Resident 9, dated August 11, 2024, at 12:17 p.m., revealed that the resident had a large emesis, had acute abdominal pain, and a history of bowel obstruction (partial or complete blockage of the small or large intestine). The physician was notified, and the resident was sent to the hospital for an evaluation. He was admitted with a urinary tract infection and small bowel obstruction. There was no documented evidence that a written notice of Resident 9's transfer to the hospital and reason for hospitalization was provided to the resident's representative. A nursing note for Resident 28, dated October 22, 2024, at 8:06 p.m., revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital and admitted with a heart attack. There was no documented evidence that a written notice of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Pennsylvania's Nurse Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify a questionable physician's order for three of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 63, 76). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. Physician's orders for Resident 19, dated October 11, 2024, included an order for staff to flush the resident's feeding tube (a medical device that provides nutrition, fluids, and medication to people who are unable to eat or drink safely by mouth) with 50 milliliters (ml) of water before and after administering medications and flush with 5 ml of water between each medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete neurological checks per protocol following a fall for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 37) and failed to ensure that medications were provided as ordered by the physician for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 76). Findings include: The facility's examination and assessment policy, dated November 21, 2024, indicated that the purpose was to examine and assess the resident for any abnormalities in their health status, one way to do this was to use a neurological assessment flow sheet. The neurological assessment form indicated that neurological checks would be completed every 15 minutes for one hour, every hour for four hours, and every four hours for 19 hours. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 37, dated October 9, 2024, indicated that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and had diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (a slow,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and facility investigations, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 36, 59). This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 36, dated November 21, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was understood and understands, required assistance with care needs, had occasional pain, received pain medication routinely and as needed, and received an opioid (a controlled pain medication). Physician's orders for Resident 36, dated April 16, 2024, included and order for the resident to receive 10 milligrams (mg) of Oxycodone every six hours as needed for pain related to chronic pain syndrome. An investigation by the facility, dated June 7, 2024, revealed that during audits for drug diversion it was noted that 60 tablets of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policies, and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 62, 76). Findings include: CDC guidance on Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs), dated July 12, 2022, indicated that multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission was common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. CMS updated its infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of a resident's needs by failing to ensure that the call bell was within reach for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding call bells, dated November 21, 2024, revealed that the call bell should be within reach of the resident. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated November 6, 2024, indicated that the resident was understood and could understand, was cognitively impaired, and was dependent on staff for all care needs. The resident's current care plan indicated that the resident had decreased mobility and that staff were to ensure the call bell was within reach. Observations of Resident 2 on December 16, 2024, at 10:15 a.m. revealed that the resident was lying in bed and was asking for her call bell. The call bell was in her nightstand drawer and was not within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or responsible party was notified about the facility's bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for three of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 9, 37, 43). This deficiency was cited as past noncompliance. Findings include: A nursing note for Resident 9, dated August 11, 2024, at 12:17 p.m., revealed that Resident 9 had a large emesis, had acute abdominal pain, and a history of bowel obstruction (partial or complete blockage of the small or large intestine). The physician was notified, and the resident was sent to the hospital for an evaluation. He was admitted with a urinary tract infection and small bowel obstruction. There was no documented evidence that Resident 9 and/or the responsible party was notified about the facility's bed-hold policy at the time of the above transfers to the hospital. A nursing note for Resident 37, dated June 29, 2024, at 3:00 a.m. revealed that Resident 37 was found lying on his floor mat between the wall and bed. No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for four of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 35, 36, 48, 60). Findings include: The Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, revealed that Section N0300 was to indicate if the resident received any type of injection during the last seven days and Section H0100A was to indicate if the resident had a nephrostomy tube (a tube inserted through the skin into the kidney that carries urine from the kidney to the bladder). Physician's orders for Resident 35, dated October 7, 2024, included an order for the resident's nephrostomy tube site be cleansed with normal saline solution and a dry dressing applied daily. A nursing note, dated November 10, 2024, revealed that the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in residents' care needs for four of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 28, 33, 39, 68). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated November 21, 2024, indicated that assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. The interdisciplinary team must review and update the care plan when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; when the desired outcome is not met; when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs). A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 28, dated September 26, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was understood and able to understand others, required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to apply dressings to pressure ulcers as ordered by the physician for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 19). Findings include: A significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19, dated December 3, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and had a diagnosis which included Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer (damage extends through all layers of skin, reaching the underlying muscle, tendon, or bone, often with exposed tissue) to his left heel, and a non-stageable pressure ulcer (unable to determine the depth of the wound) to another site. A care plan for the resident, dated November 6, 2024, revealed that the resident had an actual skin breakdown to his left great toe and staff was to administer the treatment per the physician's orders. Physician's orders for Resident 19, dated December 13, 2024, included an order for staff to cleanse the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an intravenous line (a medical technique that administers fluids, medications, and nutrients directly into a person's vein) was flushed in accordance with facility policy for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 10). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding flushing midline (a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the upper arm to deliver intravenous fluids or medicine) and central line (a long, flexible tube that is inserted into a large vein to provide access to the heart) intravenous catheters, dated November 21, 2024, revealed that midline and central line intravenous catheters will be flushed to maintain patency, to prevent mixing of incompatible medications and solutions, and to ensure entire dose of solution or medication is administered into the venous system. Flush catheters at regular intervals to maintain patency and before and after following administration of medication. Use the SASH method (saline, administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of manufacturer's instructions, facility policies, and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label multi-dose containers of inhalers with the date they were opened in one of two medication carts reviewed (B-wing med cart), failed to discard a discontinued insulin pen in one of two medication carts reviewed (B-wing med cart), failed to obtain temperatures for the medication room refrigerator on the night shift, and failed to properly secure medications in the medication cart (C-wing med cart). Findings include: Manufacturer's directions for use of Fluticasone-Salmeterol (an inhaled medication used to help open the airways and make it easier to breathe), dated April 2008, indicated to discard Fluticasone-Salmeterol diskus one month after opening the foil tray or when the counter reads 0, whichever comes first. Write the Pouch opened and Use by dates on the label on top of the diskus. The Use by date is one month from date of opening the pouch. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated August 11,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plan of correction for the State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending January 11, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of corrections that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility-maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending December 19, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to quality of care/following physician's orders, treatment of pressure ulcers, medication storage and labeling, and following infection control practices. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding quality of care/failure to follow physician's orders, cited during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident or the resident's representative was notified about a transfer to the hospital and changes in medication orders for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding residents' rights, dated November 21, 2024, revealed that the facility must immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there is a need to alter treatment significantly or when there is a decision to transfer the resident from the facility. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated August 1, 2024, revealed that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included epilepsy (chronic brain disorder that causes seizures) and gastrointestinal stromal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a reasonable accommodation of a resident's preferences for toileting was provided for two of six residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated May 7, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood and able to understand others, required assistance with care needs, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and had a diagnosis of Malignant Carcinoid Tumor of Stomach (stomach cancer). A care plan for Resident 1, revised on April 12, 2024, revealed that the resident had a potential for alteration in bowel elimination related to the need for assistance with toilet use, occasional incontinence, occasional diarrhea, bouts of constipation, and GI tumor. An interview with Resident 1 on June 20, 2024, at 5:24 p.m. revealed that she does not get toileted during meals. She stated that the staff are not allowed to toilet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to follow physician's orders for two of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 61, 66). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 61, dated August 10, 2023, revealed that the resident was alert and oriented and required extensive assistance with care. Physician's orders for Resident 61, dated May 4, 2023, included an order for the resident to have a size 18F, 30 cc indwelling foley catheter (a thin, flexible catheter used to drain urine from the bladder). Observations on January 10, 2024, at 10:08 a.m. revealed that Resident 61 had a size 18F, 10 cc indwelling foley catheter in place. Interview with the Director of Nursing on January 11, 2024, at 11:29 a.m. confirmed that the foley catheter in place for Resident 61 was not what the physician ordered. A significant change MDS assessment for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow recommendations from a wound consultation for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 55). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident 55, dated October 7, 2023, revealed that the resident had diagnoses that included COPD (congestive obstructive pulmonary disease- a lung disease), was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance from staff for personal care needs, had a history of pressure ulcers on the sacrum and behind the ears, and a need for palliative care (focuses on providing relief from pain and other symptoms of a serious illness). Review of wound consultation notes for Resident 55, dated November 21 and 28, 2023, and December 5, 2023, and January 11, 2024, revealed that pressure from the oxygen tubing was contributing to the resident having continued off and on skin breakdown behind the ears. Wound consultant recommendations included the continued use of foam protectors on the oxygen tubing behind the residents ears. Physician's orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct an air mattress safety assessment for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 33) and failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible by transporting a resident without leg rests for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 139). Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 33, dated May 8, 2023, revealed that he was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance from staff for care, and had an indwelling urinary catheter. A care plan for the resident, dated June 2, 2023, revealed that he was at risk for falls due to balance, and interventions, dated July 13, 2023, included an alternating air mattress. A nursing note for Resident 33, dated July 10, 2023, at 9:30 p.m., indicated that the nurse was called to resident's room by a nurse aide. The resident was lying on his right side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for enteral feedings (feeding through a tube inserted directly into the stomach) were followed for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 79). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding enteral feeding, dated September 21, 2023, indicated that the enteral nutrition is based on a dietician's nutritional assessment. Physician's orders for enteral nutrition are based off the recommendations from the dietician. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 79, dated November 7, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance from staff for care. Physician's orders for Resident 79, dated November 16, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive a bolus (one meal of formula) of Osmolite (a type of formula) four times a day (9:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m., and 8:00 p.m.) for meal intakes that were less than 50 percent.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician, resulting in significant medication errors for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated November 28, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, received an anticoagulant (blood thinner to prevent blood clots) medication, and had diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease (kidney failure). Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated April 30, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 2.5 milligrams (mg) of Eliquis (an anticoagulant) two times a day. A nursing note for Resident 1, dated December 27, 2023, revealed that the resident's Eliquis orders were put on hold due to surgery on December 29, 2023. Nursing staff were to check when the Eliquis was to be resumed after surgery was completed. A nursing note for Resident 1, dated December 29, 2023, at 7:30 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were appropriately secured within the medication carts for one of four medication carts reviewed (Hall B) and failed to ensure that labeling of medication matched physician's orders for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 59). Findings include: Observations of a medication cart on Hall B on January 10, 2024, at 11:58 a.m. revealed that the first of four large drawers in the medication cart contained four unidentified, loose pills; the second large drawer contained three unidentified, loose pills; and the fourth large drawer contained two unidentified, loose pills that were unsecured and not in the pharmacy's packaging. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 2 at that time confirmed that the pills were loose in the bottom of the cart drawers and should not have been. Interview with the Director of Nursing on January 10, 2024, at 12:28 p.m. confirmed that there were unidentified loose medications in the drawers of the Hall B medication cart. Physician's orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure that dietary staff wore beard coverings that completely covered their beard during food handling. Findings include: The facility's dietary policy regarding personal hygiene, dated September 21, 2023, revealed that staff were to cover all hair and facial hair with restraint, either with a hairnet, cap, or hat. Observations in the kitchen on January 10, 2024, at 11:10 a.m. revealed dietary staff at the stove preparing chicken pot pie for the resident's lunch. Dietary Aide 4 was observed with approximately four to five inches of his beard not contained within the beard net. Interview with the Dietary Director on January 10, 2024, at 11:15 a.m. confirmed that Dietary Aide 4 did not have all of his beard covered with a restraint as he should have. Interview with Nursing Home Administrator on January 10, 2024, at 3:46 p.m. confirmed that Dietary Aide 4 should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending February 8, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending January 11, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to ensure quality of care and a failure to ensure labeling and storage of medications. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding quality of care, cited during the survey ending February 8, 2023, revealed that the facility would complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper hand washing techniques were used during medication administration for three of five residents observed (Residents 17, 59, 83). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding hand hygiene, dated September 21, 2023, indicated that all employees were to follow the hand washing procedure, which included hand sanitizing, before preparing or handling medications. Observations during the medication pass in B hall on January 9, 2024, at 1:20 p.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 3 prepared Resident 83's medications and administered them. Without sanitizing her hands she prepared and administered Resident 59's medications. She then went to Resident 17's room and without sanitizing her hands she prepared and administered her medications. Licensed Practical Nurse 3 then washed her hands in the sink and exited the resident's room. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 3 on January 9, 2024, at 1:20 p.m. confirmed that she should have sanitized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to VALLEY WEST HEALTH — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WESTERN PA OPCO HOLDINGS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 10/29/2024 |
| ANDREWS, HEATHER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 09/03/2021 |
| FINN, NICHOLAS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 09/03/2021 |
| LINAM, KIM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 09/27/2023 |
| RASMUSSEN-JONES, HOLLY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 09/03/2021 |
| VALLEY WEST HEALTH LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/15/2024 |
| BEAN, KEVIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| FRANCO, AHARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| MCGINNIS, TIFFANY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| RAMI, ISAAC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| KARITY, SARAH | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| BEVERLY ENTERPRISES - PENNSYLVANIA, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| BEVERLY ENTERPRISES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| BEVERLY HEALTH AND REHABILITIATION SERVICES, INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| DRUMM INTERMEDIARY SUB CO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| DRUMM MERGER CO | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| DRUMM MERGER CO SUB LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| FILLMORE STRATEGIC INVESTORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| GEARY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| GPH JOHNSTOWN LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/12/2005 |
| PEARL SENIOR CARE, LLC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| SURETY COMPLIANCE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| WASHINGTON STATE INVESTMENT BOARD | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2024 |
| MILLER, JEAN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/15/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395610. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.