Clarion Nursing And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 73.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation and clinical record, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1) was free of neglect during care which resulted in actual harm of a completely dislocated entire left hip hemiarthroplasty (a complete dislocation of a partial hip replacement that replaces half of the hip joint). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Identifying Types of Abuse, dated 1/2/24, revealed that Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of, goods or services that a resident requires but the facility fails to provide them, and this has resulted in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to discard expired multi-dose insulin pens (medication to treat elevated blood sugar levels) in two of four medication carts (A and B Wings) and also failed to safely secure medications on one of four nursing unit medication carts (B Wing). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Labeling of Medications and Biologicals dated [DATE], indicated that multi-use vials will be dated when opened, and discarded within 28 days or according to the manufacturer's expiration date. Review of facility policy entitled, Security of Medication Cart dated [DATE], indicated that the nurse must secure the medication cart during medication pass to prevent unauthorized entry, and medication carts must be securely locked at all times when out of nurse's view. Observation on [DATE], at 12:00 p.m. of the A Wing medication cart revealed two opened Lantus (long-acting) multi-dose insulin pens with open dates of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain privacy of Protected Health Information (PHI) during medication administration for one of six medication passes observed.Findings include: A facility policy entitled, The Privacy Plan dated 2/23/26, indicated that to ensure the security of PHI, the company must ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of all PHI that the company creates, receives, maintains, or transmits. Observation on 3/03/26, at 12:30 p.m. revealed that Registered Nurse (RN]) Employee E1 was performing resident medication administration in the main dining room and left the computer screen containing resident PHI visible to anyone passing in the corridor, and that housekeeping and dietary staff passed by the visible computer screen. During an interview at that time, RN Employee E1 confirmed that the computer screen containing resident PHI was visible to anyone passing in the corridor. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer and failed to have complete documentation related to a transfer for one of two residents reviewed (Closed Record Resident CR77).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Transfer/Discharge Documentation dated 2/18/25, indicated that when a resident is transferred to acute care the facility will:contact the provider hospital, when possible, for admission arrangements.original copies of the transfer form and advanced directives will accompany the resident, and copies will be retained in the medical record.contact information of the practitioner who was responsible for the care of the resident.resident representative information, including contact information.resident status, including baseline and current mental, behavioral and functional status, reason for transfer, and recent vital signs.diagnoses, allergies, and medications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide resident-directed care and treatment consistent with physician orders, and professional standards of practice related to medication administration for 37 of 62 residents on two evening shifts on 12/05/25 and 12/06/25. (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R6-R28, and R30-R39)Findings include: The most recent facility policy entitled Administering Medications revealed that medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including required timeframe, and that medications are administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (before and after meals). Review of medication administration records on 12/05/25, evening shift revealed the following medications were administered more than one hour late: Resident R1- four medications scheduled at 8:00 p.m., administered at 10:43-10:46 p.m. Resident R2- three medications scheduled at 8:00 p.m., administered at 10:12 p.m.Resident R3- six medications scheduled at 8:00 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident plan of care was followed for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R224). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Repositioning dated 1/21/25, indicated that Review the resident's care plan to evaluate for any special needs . Repositioning is critical for a resident who is immobile or dependent upon staff for repositioning. and Residents who are in bed should be on at least an every two hour (q2 hour) repositioning schedule. Review of Resident R224's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/19/25, with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), hypothyroidism (a condition when the thyroid produces low amounts of thyroid hormones), and chronic systolic congestive heart failure (the inability of the heart to maintain an adequate supply of blood to organs and tissues). Review of Resident 224's care plans revealed a plan of care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion related to a contracture (a permanent or temporary tightening of soft tissues and muscles that restricts normal movements) received physician ordered treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R19). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Use of Assistive Devices dated 1/21/25, revealed A nurse with responsibility for the resident will monitor for the consistent use of the device and safety in the use of the device. Review of Resident R19's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/3/23, with diagnoses that included orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, myopathy (a disease that attacks muscles making them weak), and muscle spasm. Review of Resident R19's physician's orders revealed an order dated 10/23/24, to place a rolled up washcloth in resident's right hand for contracture until palm grips…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen according to physician's orders for one of one residents reviewed for respiratory services (Resident R224). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Oxygen Administration dated 1/21/25, indicated Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's order . for oxygen administration, and Review the resident's care plan . Review of Resident R224's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/19/25, with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), hypothyroidism (a condition when the thyroid produces low amounts of thyroid hormones), and chronic systolic congestive heart failure (the inability of the heart to maintain an adequate supply of blood to organs and tissues). Review of Resident R224's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 3/20/25, for Oxygen 1.5L/min (liters per minute) only at hours of sleep every night shift. Review of Resident R224's respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and manufacturer's guidelines, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly dated when opened and failed to ensure expired medications were discarded in a timely manner in one medication room and in one of two medication carts reviewed (C/B Medication Room and B-Wing Cart). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Storage of Medications dated 1/21/25, indicated that, Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal. Review of a facility policy entitled Medication Labeling and Storage dated 1/21/25, indicated that, Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Manufacturer's guidelines for Tubersol PPD (solution used for tuberculosis testing upon admission and for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0836 — isolated
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, Pennsylvania Code Title 49. Professional and Vocational Standards, clinical records, and facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow nursing standards of practice for safe medication administration for one of two residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Facility Policy entitled, Administering Medications, dated 1/2/2024, indicated, 11. The following information is checked/verified for each resident prior to administering medications: a. Allergies to medications. Review of Pennsylvania Code Title 49. Professional and Vocational Standards 21.145. Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a)(3) stated, The LPN shall question any order which is perceived as unsafe or contraindicated for the patient or which is not clear and shall raise the issue with the ordering practitioner. If the ordering practitioner is not available, the LPN shall raise the issue with a Registered Nurse (RN) or other responsible person in a manner consistent with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of rights of medication administration, facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice for medication administration during observation of one of three resident units (Unit C). Findings include: Review of Eight Rights of Medication Administration published by [NAME] (a prominent medical publisher that provides essential health information for practitioners, faculty, residents, students and healthcare institutions) on 5/28/2011, rights of medication administration include: Right Patient, Right Medication (includes checking label and checking physician order), Right Dose (includes checking order), Right Route, Right Time, Right Documentation (after administration), Right Reason, and Right Response. Review of facility policy entitled Administering Medications dated 1/2/24, indicated The individual administering the medication checked the label THREE (3) times to verify the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-03-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VALLEY WEST HEALTH — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA