No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Haida Nursing And Rehab

397 Third Avenue Extension, Hastings, PA 16646 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 98 certified beds · (814) 247-6578 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 247-6578 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 20232 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
564 Theatre Rd · (814) 344-8477 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Beaver St · (814) 247-9959 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
503 Railroad Ave · (814) 674-3311 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.9%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.5%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.6%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.9%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.5%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.6%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.2%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.5%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.1%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.2%9.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.051.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.001.181.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.2%CMS range 40.3–60.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.4–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified76.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.7%CMS range 5.6–17.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
35.8%
Total nursing turnover
22.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 84.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-04)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Pennsylvania Nurse Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify physician's orders and a diagnosis of diabetes resulting in hospitalization for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect, complete, and review ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated October 1, 2024, indicated that the resident was admitted from a hospital, was cognitively impaired, and dependent on staff for care. A nurse's note for Resident 2, dated October 3, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-08-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, clinical records and investigation reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2) was free from abuse perpetrated by another resident (Resident 3) resulting in a fractured nose. Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated June 6, 2023, indicated that residents have the right to be free form abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental,sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated May 16, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, could rarely understand or be understood, required extensive assistance of two staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia, psychotic disturbance (loss of contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call bells were within reach for two of 10 residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 10). Findings include: A review of a facility policy regarding answering the call light, dated October 15, 2025, indicated that when a resident is in bed or confined to a chair, be sure that the call light is within reach of the resident. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 1, dated March 6, 2026, indicated that the resident had cognitive impairment, was clearly able to make herself understood and could clearly understand others, required substantial assistance from staff for toilet transfers and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. A care plan for the resident, dated July 23, 2025, included an intervention to keep the call bell within reach. Observation of Resident 1 on June 9, 2026, at 10:19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to follow/clarify physician's diet orders prior to a test, for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 3 ).Findings include: The facility's policy regarding treatment orders, dated October 15, 2025, revealed that treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing. In addition, nursing staff will review the overall situation for a resident for whom one or more meals are to be held to ensure that all related issues are addressed. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated April 21, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, always understood and always understands and has diagnoses that include quadriplegia and cancer of the lymph nodes, face and neck. Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated May 11, 2026, included the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for six of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 16, 24, 52, 70, 71). Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2025, indicated that an admission MDS assessment was to be completed no later than 14 days (admission date + 13 calendar days) following admission.An admission MDS assessment for Resident 2 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and the resident's admission MDS assessment was dated as completed on September 3, 2025, which was 21 days after admission.An admission MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for three of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 4, 12, 68). Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides guidance and instructions for the completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2025, indicated that Section N0415K1 (Anticonvulsant-medications medication used to prevent or treat seizures) was to be coded (1) was taking, if the resident received an anticonvulsant medication during the seven day look back period.A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 4 dated October 2, 2025, revealed that Section N0415K Anticonvulsant was coded that the resident received anticonvulsants during the lookback period. However, a review of the MAR for Resident 4 for September…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs of residents for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 1 ). Findings include: The facility's policy for care plans, dated October 15, 2025, indicated that the resident and his or her representative were encouraged to participate in the development and implementation of the resident's person-centered care plan. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated October 27, 2025, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance from staff with daily care tasks, and had diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, anemia and acute respiratory failure. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated October 22, 2025, included orders for the resident to receive oxygen at 4 liters per minute, due to an onset of shortness of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, facility policies, clinical records, and facility investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify physician's orders for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 8).Findings include:The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was responsible for assessing human responses and plans, implementing nursing care, analyzing/comparing data with the norm in determining care needs, and carrying out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. The facility's medication administration policy, dated October 15, 2025, revealed that medications were administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who were legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. They will ensure the six rights of medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and shower schedules, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers as scheduled for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 36 and 66).Findings include: The facility's policy for resident showers, dated October 15, 2025, indicated that it was the practice of the facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene, stimulate circulation and help prevent skin issues as per current standards of practice. Residents would be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedule protocols and based upon resident safety. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 36, dated November 11, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for personal hygiene care including showers, and had a diagnosis of dementia. A review of the shower records for Resident 36, dated October 2025 and November 2025, revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pressure relieving devices were in place as ordered by the physician for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 5).Findings include:A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated November 21, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, and had diagnoses that included diabetes and heart failure. Physician's orders for Resident 5, dated September 17, 2025, included orders for the resident to wear Prevalon boots (a type of heel protector used in medical settings to prevent pressure injuries) on both feet for heel protection. A care plan for Resident 5, dated September 18, 2025, indicated that the resident was at risk for altered skin integrity and Prevalon boots were to be worn on both feet at all times when in bed. Observations of Resident 5 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received proper care for an indwelling urinary catheter for one of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 20).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding urinary catheters (a tube inserted and held in the bladder to drain urine), dated October 15, 2025, indicated that the purpose of the policy was to ensure safe handling of the urinary catheter in order to reduce the risk of urinary tract infections. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident 20, dated October 21, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted and held in the bladder to drain urine) and had diagnoses that included obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage of urine and a condition where urine flows backward from the bladder up the ureters).Physician's orders for Resident 20, dated September 23, 2025, included an order for the resident to have an indwelling urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of hospice contracts and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated interdisciplinary team member obtained the required information from the contracted hospice provider for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 9) who were receiving hospice services. Findings include: A hospice contract, dated July 31, 2025, indicated that all hospice assessments, plans of care, progress notes and services provided will be maintained in the medical record and integrated with the facility plan of care. Nursing staff would ensure there was a current physician's order, physician progress notes regarding hospice care, and hospice documentation that was current and available on the medical record. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 9, dated October 18, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for daily care needs, had diagnoses that included a cancerous tumor of the pelvic bones, and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents medication regime was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication (drugs that affect a person's mental state, emotions, and behavior) for two of 5 residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 5). Findings Include: The facility policy related to the use of psychotropic medications, dated April 23, 2025, indicated that residents will only receive psychotropic medications when other nonpharmacological interventions are clinically contraindicated. Additionally, these medications should only be used to treat the resident's medical symptoms and not used for discipline or staff convenience, which would deem it a chemical restraint. Nonpharmacological approaches must be attempted, unless clinically contraindicated, to minimize the need for psychotropic medications, use the lowest possible dose, or discontinue the medications. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident representative in advance of the risks and benefits of a psychotropic medication (medications that affect the persons mental state, emotions and behavior) use and the treatment alternatives prior to initiating the administration of the medication for two of 5 residents reviewed (Resident 1 and 5).Findings Include: The facility's policy related to the use of psychotropic medications, dated April 23, 2025, indicated that prior to initiating or increasing a psychotropic medication, the resident, family, and/or resident representative must be informed of the benefits, risks, and alternatives for the medications, including any black box warnings for antipsychotic medications, in advance of such initiation or increase. The facility will document that the resident or resident representative was informed in advance of the risks and benefits of the proposed care, the treatment alternatives or other options and the preferred option to accept…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's representative/interested family member was notified timely about the need to alter treatment/changes in physician's orders for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 7). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding charting and documentation, dated July 25, 2024, indicated that documentation of procedures and treatments will include care-specific details, including notification of family, physician, or other staff, if indicated. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated December 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, understands with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score (BIMs - intended to determine the resident's attention, orientation and ability to register and recall new information and whether the resident has signs and symptoms of delirium) of 10, indicating that the resident was moderately impaired,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated November 20, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and had a Crohn's disease (a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that causes inflammation in the digestive tract), diabetes (a chronic disease that occurs when the body can not produce or use insulin properly, resulting in high blood sugar levels), and hemiplegia (a neurological condition that causes paralysis or weakness on one side of the body). The resident's clinical record revealed that Resident Family Member 2 (son) and Resident Family Member 3 (daughter-in-law) were the resident's emergency contacts and were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings Include: The facility's policy regarding charting and documentation, dated July 25, 2024, indicated that documentation in the medical record will be objective, complete, and accurate. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated November 20, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and had Crohn's disease (a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that causes inflammation in the digestive tract), diabetes (a chronic disease that occurs when the body can not produce or use insulin properly, resulting in high blood sugar levels), and hemiplegia (a neurological condition that causes paralysis or weakness on one side of the body). The resident's clinical record revealed that Resident Family Member 2 (son)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident, the responsible party, and long-term care ombudsman in writing regarding the reason for hospitalization for seven of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 19, 22, 27, 29, 53, 64). Findings include: A nursing note for Resident 1, dated September 27, 2024, at 12:52 a.m. revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital with congestive heart failure (a medical condition where the heart is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs). There was no documented evidence that a written notice of Resident 1's transfer to the hospital was provided to the emergency contact or the long-term care ombudsman regarding the reason for transfer. A nursing note for Resident 19, dated September 24, 2024, at 1:07 a.m., revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital with urinary tract infection and possible pneumonia. There was no documented evidence that a written notice of Resident 19's transfer to the hospital was provided to the resident's emergency contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy to the resident and/or the resident's representative at the time of a transfer for five of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 22, 27, 29, 53). Findings include: A nursing note for Resident 1, dated September 27, 2024, at 12:52 a.m. revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital with congestive heart failure (a medical condition where the heart is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs). There was no documented evidence that the resident and/or the responsible party was notified about the facility's bed-hold policy at the time of the above transfer to the hospital for Resident 1. A nursing note for Resident 22, dated September 27, 2024, at 1:21 a.m., revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital with hypoosmolarity hyperglycemic state (high blood sugar). There was no documented evidence that the resident and/or the responsible party was notified about the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were accurately documented for two of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 24, 45). Findings include: Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 24). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 24, dated July 5, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff assistance for daily care needs, had a diagnosis of depression. Physician's orders for Resident 24, dated October 22, 2024, included orders for the resident to receive 0.5 mg of 2mg/ml Lorazepam (a medication to treat anxiety) every four hours as needed. Review of Resident 24's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October 2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a professional licensure check prior to hire for one of one licensed practical nurse reviewed (Licensed Practical Nurse 1). Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated August 27, 2024, indicated that the facility will not employ individuals that had a disciplinary action in effect against his or her professional license by a state licensure body as a result of a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of resident property. Review of personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse 1 revealed that she was hired on September 3, 2024, and the Pennsylvania Professional Licensure check was not verified until November 4, 2024, two months after she was hired. Interview with Director of Human Resources on November 5, 2024, at 11:05 a.m. confirmed that the license check for Licensed Practical Nurse 1 was not done timely. She stated that she accidently ran the check on her graduate license and not her permanent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 9, 29). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, revealed that Section N0350 Insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar) was to be coded if the resident received insulin during the seven-day look-back period. Section N0350A was to be coded with the number of days the resident received insulin injections during the look-back period. Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated September 11, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 1.8 milligrams (mg) of Victoza (non-insulin medication used to treat diabetes) subcutaneously (beneath the skin) one time a day. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was created to reflect the resident's specific care needs for two of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 82). A facility policy regarding care plans, dated August 27, 2024, revealed that care plans shall incorporate goals and objectives that lead to the resident's highest obtainable level of independence. Care plan goals and objectives were derived from information contained in the resident's comprehensive assessment. A facility policy regarding tobacco-free policy, dated October 29, 2024, revealed that the facility was tobacco free, and the facility prohibits the possession and/or storage of all smoking/smokeless tobacco materials. However, any resident admitted to the facility prior to the effective date of this policy would be Grandfathered into the prior policy and procedure. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pressure ulcer treatments were provided to prevent infection for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 19). Findings include: A facility policy regarding pressure ulcer/skin breakdown clinical protocol policy, dated August 27, 2024, revealed that the physician would authorize pertinent orders related to wound treatments, including wound cleansing and debridement approaches, dressings, and applications of topical agents, if indicated for type of skin alteration. A facility policy regarding handwashing/hand hygiene policy, dated August 27, 2024, revealed that staff were to use alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62 percent alcohol or, alternatively, soap and water after handling clean or soiled dressings and gauze pads. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19, dated October 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was clearly understood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician-ordered contracture management interventions were provided as care planned for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 65). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 65, dated August 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assist assistance from staff for personal hygiene, and had diagnosis that included hemiplegia/hemiparalysis (a medical condition that causes weakness or paralysis on one side of the body). Resident 65's care plan, dated March 5, 2024, indicated that the resident was to always have a rolled towel in her left hand, except during a.m. and p.m. care, and it was to be checked for placement and integrity. Physician's orders for Resident 65, dated June 5, 2024, revealed the resident was to always have a rolled towel in her left hand, and it was to be checked every shift for placement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and facility investigation reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete safety assessments for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 47) who used an air mattress. Findings include: A facility policy regarding support surface guidelines, dated August 27, 2024, indicated that the facility would follow the guidelines for the assessment of appropriate pressure-reducing and relieving devices for residents at risk for skin break down. Support surfaces were critical to pressure ulcer prevention and general safety include pressured redistribution, moisture control, shear reduction, and life expectancy. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 47, dated June 29, 2024, revealed that the resident was usually understood, could usually understand others, was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for care needs, had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (full thickness skin loss into the lower layers of skin) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that long-term intravenous catheters were flushed and arm circumference was measured as ordered for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 82). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding flushing central and midline catheters (a tube placed in a vein that can be used to deliver fluids and/or medications), dated August 27, 2024, revealed that when a resident was ordered intravenous medication, a 10 milliliter (ml) saline flush (a method used to clean a catheter of blood or medication) was to be administered before each medication was infused. Physician's orders for Resident 82, dated November 1, 2024, included an order for the peripherally-inserted central catheter (PICC line - a type of catheter that is inserted through a peripheral vein and used long-term to administer medications and/or fluids) be flushed with a minimum of 10 cubic centimeters (cc's) of 0.9 percent sodium chloride (sterile salt water solution) every shift, before and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician wrote a progress note for each visit for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 15). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 15, dated August 16, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required maximum assistance from staff for care. A nurse's note for Resident 15, dated March 5, 2024, at 3:30 p.m., revealed that the resident was seen by the physician regarding her increased behaviors in the evening and increased meanness towards her family and spoke with the physician at length; however, there was no documented evidence of a provider's progress note in the clinical record. A nurse's note for Resident 15, dated March 14, 2024, at 2:09 p.m., revealed that the resident was examined by the physician at bedside; however, there was no documented evidence of a provider's progress note in the clinical record. A nurse's note for Resident 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and pharmacy labels for medications, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly labeled and dated for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 19). Findings include: A facility policy regarding medication ordering and receiving from pharmacy policy, dated August 27, 2024, revealed that improper and inaccurate labeled medications were rejected and returned to the dispensing pharmacy. Medication labels were not to be altered, modified, or marked in any way by nursing personnel. If the physician's directions for use change or the label was inaccurate, the nurse may place a change or order - check chart label on the container indicating there is a change in directions for use, taking care not to cover important label information. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19, dated October 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was clearly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plan of correction for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending December 7, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending November 7, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to ensure that Minimum Data Sets (MDS, a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) assessments were accurate upon submission, develop individualized care plans, and properly store and label medications. The facility's plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policies, and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination during a COVID-19 outbreak and failed to follow infection control guidelines from CMS and the CDC for residents requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for six of seven residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding COVID-19 management, dated August 27, 2024, indicated that the facility follows current guidelines and recommendations for managing COVID-19 in the facility. This included ensuring the facility has all the necessary supplies, including personal protective equipment (PPE). The CDC recommends a 10-day isolation period for residents with suspected or confirmed COVID infection, and the door should be kept closed if safe to do so. CDC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and facility investigative documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision by failing to ensure that care-planned interventions were in place for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated March 21, 2024, indicated that the resident could usually understand, was usually understood, was cognitively intact, and required extensive assistance from staff for daily care. Resident 2's care plan, dated June 14, 2023, revealed that she was to have an extensive assist of two when providing care. A witness statement from Nurse Aide 1, dated March 27, 2024, revealed that she provided incontinence care to Resident 2 by herself around 12:00 a.m A witness statement from Licensed Practical Nurse 2, dated March 27, 2024, revealed that Tylenol was administered to Resident 2 at 1:00 a.m. due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident-centered care plans were developed and implemented for four of 32 residents reviewed (Residents 12, 37, 60, 69). Findings include: A facility policy regarding comprehensive, person-centered care plans, dated December 21, 2022, indicated that the care plan would include measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs and be developed and implemented for each resident. The care plan will identify problem areas and their causes that are meaningful to the resident. The care plan shall be reviewed and updated when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 12, dated October 19, 2023, indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required partial to moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-07 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed annually based on hire dates for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aides 3, 4, 5). Findings include: A list of nurse aides provided by the facility revealed that based on their months and dates of hire, annual performance evaluations were due during the 2023 calendar year for Nurse Aides 3, 4 and 5. The date of hire for Nurse Aide 3 was March 27, 2017; Nurse Aide 4 was June 15, 2021; and Nurse Aide 5 was June 15, 2021. As of December 7, 2023, there was no documented evidence that annual performance evaluations were completed for 2023 as required for Nurse Aides 3, 4 or 5. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on December 7, 2023, at 2:33 p.m. confirmed that annual performance evaluations were not completed as required for Nurse Aides 3, 4 and 5. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1) Management. 28 Pa. Code 201.20(a)(c) Staff development.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 38). Findings include: A facility policy for care planning, dated November 16, 2023, revealed that assessments of residents were ongoing and care plans were revised as information about the residents' conditions change. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 38, dated August 8, 2023, revealed that the resident was understood and could understand others, had a cognitive impairment, and was dependent on staff for daily care needs. A care plan for Resident 38, updated August 8, 2023, revealed that the resident was receiving a diuretic medication (water pill). Current physician's orders for Resident 38 revealed that the resident was not receiving a diuretic medication. Interview with Director of Nursing on December 8, 2023, at 08:43…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a dialysis emergency kit was at the resident's bedside for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 25). The findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 25, dated September 5, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required hemodialysis (a process of cleaning the blood of toxins and returning it into the body). Physician's orders, dated September 6, 2023, included an order for the resident to have a dialysis emergency kit containing a tourniquet, sterile gauze, gloves, etc. at the resident's bedside in order to stop bleeding in case the resident's dialysis catheter pulls out or breaks off. Observation of Resident 25 on December 7, 2023, at 9:09 a.m. revealed that she was lying in bed and had a fistula to her left arm. There was no emergency equipment at her bed side. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 2 on December 7, 2023, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for three of 32 residents reviewed (Residents 31, 34, 54). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated November 16, 2023, indicated that staff were to document on the appropriate line of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) that the medication was given. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 31, dated November 8, 2023, revealed that the resident is alert, able to make needs known, and requires assistance with all care. Physician's orders for Resident R31, dated May 12, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive one 5/325 milligrams (mg) tablet of Norco (a controlled narcotic pain medication) every six hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. Resident R31's controlled drug records for September and October 2023 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records reviews, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label medications with the date they were opened for one of three bottles in the medication refrigerator. Findings include: The facility's policy on medication labeling and storage, dated November 16, 2023, revealed that multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (needle punctured) are to be dated and discarded within 28 days. Observations in the facility's medication room refrigerator on December 7, 2023, at 1:01 p.m. revealed one opened and undated bottle of Tubersol Tuberculin injection for Mantoux TB skin test (to test for tuberculosis). Interview with Registered Nurse 8 on December 7, 2023, at 1:01 p.m. confirmed that the bottle of Tubersol was not dated when it was opened, and that it should have been. Interview with the Director of Nursing on December 7, 2023, at 1:34 p.m. confirmed that the opened vial of Tubersol should have been dated when opened. 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1)(h) Pharmacy services.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow recommendations from a wound consultation for two of seven residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated August 2, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with daily care activities, including bed mobility, was dependent for transfers, could not walk, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss, subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed), and had a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle). The resident's care plan, dated September 19, 2022, included that the resident had pressure ulcers, and treatments were to be completed as ordered by the physician. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated June 2, 2023, included an order for 0.25 percent acetic acid (inhibits…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VALLEY WEST HEALTH — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WESTERN PA OPCO HOLDINGS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 10/29/2024
FRANCO, AHARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/29/2024
RAMI, ISAACIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/29/2024
BEVERLY ENTERPRISES - PENNSYLVANIA, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
BEVERLY ENTERPRISES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
BEVERLY HEALTH AND REHABILITIATION SERVICES, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
DRUMM INTERMEDIARY SUB CO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
DRUMM MERGER COOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
DRUMM MERGER CO SUB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
FILLMORE STRATEGIC INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
GEARY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
GPH HASTINGS LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
ISKEB WESTERN PA LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
KEYSTONE VENTURES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
PEARL SENIOR CARE, LLC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
VALLEY WEST HEALTH LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
WASHINGTON STATE INVESTMENT BOARDOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
ANDREWS, HEATHERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/03/2021
DVORCHAK, MATTHEWIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
ETCHELS, WILLIAMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
FINN, NICHOLASIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2018
LINAM, KIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/27/2023
MILLER, JEANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/15/2024
RASMUSSEN-JONES, HOLLYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/26/2016
STINSON, TRACEEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-25.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 4%Other / private 26%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$343per resident / day
operating cost
$10,438per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$273per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395592. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next