Riverside Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 76.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.65 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-04-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to provide food and drink that were palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, for three (4) of the three (4) meals reviewed (Breakfast meal 04/09/2026 and two (2) Lunch meals) on 04/06/2026 and 4/10/2026. Specifically, food and drinks were not served at a palatable and appetizing temperature or taste. Findings Include: Facility policy titled Resident Meal Service, reviewed 04/2026, documented the facility would provide each resident with nourishing, palatable, and attractive meals. Residents who refuse meals were to be offered an alternative meal off the facility alternative meal list. Residents were to be provided with a variety of food and liquid items. Meal tickets were to be checked for accuracy prior to serving residents. Observation: During a meal sampling on 04/06/2026 at 12:28 PM, a sample of three (3) plates were observed from the South unit dining room steam table. The lunch service was observed, and the results were as follows: The cauliflower appeared…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards. Specifically, unwrapped or contained pork was thawed in still water that contained carrots floating on the water surface, items were stored in the refrigerators without being labeled or dated with an open or preparation date, beverages were prepared and placed in walk in freezer for cooling, and personal food was stored the small slide open top freezer. Findings Include: Facility Policy titled CCS Food Storage Criteria (undated) documented Storage Guidelines. Refrigerator storage documented items were to be labeled and unlabeled items were to be discarded. Freezer storage was for long term storage and not for cooling foods. All food items were to be checked for the Use by or best before date, and that date was to be honored even if the items did not appear to be spoiled. During a tour of the facility kitchen on 04/06/2026 at 10:05 AM, the following was observed:A small bag of mixed frozen fruit was unlabeled in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident observation, record reviews and staff interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set data submitted for one resident. The Minimum Data Set assessment did not accurately reflect the residents' conditions for one (1) of 19 residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #11 diagnosed with Contractures, documented on the Quarterly Minimum Data Set dated 3/11/2026 no impairment to the upper or lower extremities. This resulted in misrepresentation of the resident's status during the assessment period. Findings include: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis Contracture (the abnormal, often permanent shortening and stiffening of muscles, tendons, skin, or other soft tissues, leading to restricted joint movement and potential deformity), Left Wrist Contracture and Contracture of Muscle multiple sites. The Activities of Daily Living/Mobility Comprehensive Care Plan dated 7/07/2026 documented the resident was dependent and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-04-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: 19Number of residents cited: 1 Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to obtain a Level II evaluation recommended by the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review. Specifically, for Resident #55, a Level II evaluation was not obtained in the presence of significant mental illness. Findings include: Resident #55 The policy and procedure titled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, revised 04/2026, stated a positive Level I screen required an additional evaluation of the individual by the state designated authority, the Level II review must be completed prior to admission to the facility. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of bipolar disorder (a chronic mental health condition characterized by extreme mood swings, alternating between intense highs and lows causing significant disruption to daily life), chronic hepatitis (persistent liver inflammation lasting longer than six months), and urinary tract infection (a bacterial infection of the urinary system). The Minimum Data Set (an assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews and interviews during survey, the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered comprehensive care plans for residents in accordance with professional standards for two (2) (Residents #3 and #34) of 19 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Specifically, there was no comprehensive care plan to address Resident #3's dementia diagnosis and, separately, to address Resident #34's use of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure machine. Findings include: The policy and procedure titled Care Planning, revised 4/2026, stated the comprehensive care plan should describe the resident's medical, nursing, physical, mental, and psychological needs and preferences and how the facility will assist in meeting these needs and preferences. Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of sepsis (a life-threatening medical emergency caused by an improper, extreme bodily response to infection, leading to potential organ damage, shock, and death), vascular dementia (a decline in thinking skills caused by conditions that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received necessary treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of 19 residents reviewed for quality of care. Specifically, Resident #11 had a physician-ordered splint for their left wrist and hand. On 4/10/2026 at 9:05 AM and 12:15 PM, Resident #11 was observed without the splint. This placed the resident at risk for decline in physical functioning. Finding is: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility with a diagnoses including nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage in hemisphere (spontaneous bleeding within the brain tissue, often leading to significant neurological deficits), stiffness of other specified joint, muscle weakness, and left wrist contracture and contracture of Muscle multiple sites (the abnormal, often permanent shortening and stiffening of muscles, tendons, skin, or other soft tissues, leading to restricted joint movement and potential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision for one (1) (Resident #16) of eight (8) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #16 was assessed to have a high risk for falls, severely impaired cognition, and a history of falls. Resident #16 was care planned to be in a supervised area when out of her room. This resident was left unattended in a day room and fell on [DATE].Findings include:Resident #16 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance (a form of cognitive decline where the specific type of dementia is not identified, accompanied by behavioral and psychological symptoms that affect daily functioning), Vascular dementia (a decline in thinking skills caused by conditions that block or reduce blood flow to the brain, damaging tissue). The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 03/23/2026 documented that the resident usually understood others, was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review during the survey, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for a clinically justified indwelling urinary catheter, provide adequate oversight and maintain proper infection control practices for one (1) of 2 residents (Resident # 26). Specifically, Resident #26 was observed on 04/10/2026 at 8:32 AM with a urinary drainage bag on the floor and not utilizing a leg bag as indicated, staff interviews revealed the staff considered the resident independent in changing the leg bag. This deficient practice placed the resident at increased risk for contamination and infection. Findings Include: The Catheter Care Policy and Procedure last reviewed date 4/2026 documented the procedure for Catheter Care and the responsible disciplines as the Certified Nursing Assistant, Licensed Practical Nurse and Registered Nurse. The Changing Urinary Drainage Bag Policy dated 10/2002, last reviewed 04/2026; documented changing of the urinary drainage bags/leg bags is performed by licensed nursing personnel only and is performed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure appropriate respiratory care and services were provided for 1of 2 residents (Resident # 34) reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident # 34 had a diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (a sleep disorder characterized by repeated interruptions in breathing during sleep) and required the use of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine (a device that delivers a constant stream of pressurized air to keep the airways open during sleep, used to treat sleep apnea). The medical record had no documented evidence of a necessary physician's order and had no documented evidence of an implemented care plan to address the resident's need for CPAP therapy and equipment maintenance. Interview of the Resident and Staff revealed the resident did not receive assistance with required equipment maintenance , resulting in the resident going without use of the device for approximately two (2) weeks, placing the resident at risk of complications related to untreated sleep apnea.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: 5Number of residents cited: 1The policy and procedure titled Physician Orders, revised 12/2025, stated orders for medications must include Name and strength of the drug,Number of doses, start and stop date, and/or specific duration of therapy;Dosage and frequency of administration;Clinical condition or symptoms for which the medication is prescribed;Any interim follow-up requirements.The policy and procedure titled Medication Administration, revised 12/2025, stated medications must be administered in accordance with the order. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of sepsis (a life-threatening medical emergency caused by an improper, extreme bodily response to infection, leading to potential organ damage, shock, and death), vascular dementia (a decline in thinking skills caused by conditions that block or reduce blood flow to the brain, damaging tissue) with other behavioral disturbance (dementia-related problem behaviors often stemming from unmet needs, pain, or condition including agitation, aggression, wandering, repetition,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to UPSTATE SERVICES GROUP — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY