Beechtree Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 141 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 126 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.2 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.546 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00342762) surveys conducted 8/24/2025-8/29/2025 the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards in one (1) out of one (1) main kitchen and for two staff (Dietary Aide #1 and Certified Nurse Aide #4). Specifically, in the main kitchen food was not labelled and dated; refrigerator and freezer temperatures were not recorded; cookware was not sanitized appropriately; potentially hazardous food temperatures were not recorded; and the ice machine was unclean. Additionally, Dietary Aide #1 did not wear a beard restraint while preparing meal trays; and Certified Nurse Aide #4 scratched their head and played with their hair while serving food. Findings include:The facility policy Food and Non-Food Storage, revised 01/2025, documented refrigerator temperatures were recorded daily; foods were labeled and dated.The facility policy Kitchen Equipment Maintenance, revised 8/4/2025, documented refrigerator and freezer temperatures…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/24/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did not ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for two (2) of (2) two meals (lunch meals on 8/25/2025 and 8/26/2025) reviewed. Specifically, food was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures during the lunch meals on 8/25/2025 and 8/26/2025. Additionally, Residents #3 and #8 stated the food was not palatable and Resident #34 stated the food was often cold. Findings include: The facility policy Food Temperature and Palatability, revised 9/9/2024 documented all hot food items were maintained at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or greater until served. Cold food items were served at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below. Resident meals would be palatable, visually appealing, and prepared in a manner consistent with resident preferences and nutritional needs. Resident interviews on 8/24/2025 included the following:-at 3:23 PM, Resident #8 stated the food was not palatable.-at 4:27 PM, Resident # 3 stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/24/2025 - 8/29/2025, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #113) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #113 did not have their blood pressure monitored as ordered. Findings include:Resident #113 had diagnoses including coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension. The 8/7/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had intact cognition.The Comprehensive Care Plan initiated 12/20/2024 and revised 5/2/2025, documented the resident had hypertension. Interventions included antihypertensives as ordered, monitor for side effects, monitor for edema, monitor/document/report signs and symptoms of malignant hypertension (severe form of high blood pressure). There was no documentation regarding monitoring of blood pressure. The August 2025 Medication Administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/24/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for one (1) of three (3) medication carts (Unit 2 medication cart) reviewed. Specifically, the Unit 2 medication cart had expired multidose medications. Findings include: The facility policy Medication Storage, reviewed 3/2025, expired, discontinued, or contaminated medications were removed from storage and disposed of in accordance with facility policy and manufacturer guidance. All medications were stored in an orderly manner and remain properly labeled and identifiable until use.During a Unit 2 medication cart observation on 8/25/2025 at 1:36 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse #5, the following was observed:-cyclopentolate ophthalmic solution (eye drops) with an expiration date of 8/2023.-albuterol with an expiration date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/24/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did not ensure planned menus were followed for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #3 and #8) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #3 and #8 did not receive double portions as planned.Findings include:The facility policy Tray Ticket Accuracy, revised 9/9/2024, documented tray tickets would be accurate, up to date, and verified prior to tray assembly and service. The facility would ensure all resident meal trays were prepared and served according to the physician's diet orders and individual food likes/ dislikes as documented in the resident's plan of care. Staff assembling meal trays strictly matched the food items to the tray ticket; before releasing the meal tray staff verified accuracy by comparing the tray contents with the tray ticket; and if discrepancies were noted during meal service, the tray was returned for immediate correction. The facility policy Food Temperature and Palatability, revised 9/9/2024, documented resident preferences and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00383732) surveys conducted 8/24/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (2) of seven (7) residents (Residents #8 and #111) reviewed. Specifically, staff did not wear personal protective equipment when entering Residents #8's and #111's rooms, who were on contact precautions.Findings include: 1) Resident #8 had diagnoses including methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (antibiotic resistant bacteria) infection and local infection of the skin. The 6/5/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had intact cognition, multidrug-resistant organisms, a wound infection, and required applications of nonsurgical dressings to feet.The 6/30/2025 Comprehensive Care Plan documented the resident had methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus in the left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00315978) surveys conducted 11/13/2023-11/17/2023, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for three isolated areas (the shower room across from room [ROOM NUMBER], the bathroom in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], and the main kitchen dish machine room). Specifically, the floor in the shower room across from room [ROOM NUMBER] was damaged; the wall in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom had a hole in it; and a hand wash sink in the main kitchen dish machine room was leaking. Finding include: During an observation and interview on 11/15/2023 at 10:03 AM, the floor in the shower room across from room [ROOM NUMBER] had cracked and peeled sections where water could get under the vinyl flooring material. The Maintenance Director stated that they were not aware that the vinyl flooring had lifted around the floor drain. During an observation and interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00315667) surveys conducted 11/13/2023-11/17/2023, the facility did not ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for 2 of 2 meals reviewed (11/14/2023 and 11/15/2023 lunch meals). Specifically, food was not flavorful and was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures. Findings include: The facility's undated Hot Foods Policy documented the kitchen would assure that hot foods were held so that all parts of the food met current temperature regulations for hot holding. Potentially hazardous food must be held and served at 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or above (or at the temperature dictated by the local health regulations). The facility policy Test Trays dated 5/2009 documented three times a week the food and nutrition supervisor would make up a test tray from either the lunch or supper meal. The cook would let the tray set for up to 15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00315667 and NY00326467) surveys conducted 11/13/23-11/17/23, the facility did not ensure each resident had the right to a dignified existence for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #33 and #91) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #33 had an unclean incontinence pad in their recliner and Resident #91's wheelchair head rest cover was in disrepair with exposed foam. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Rights dated 4/2/2023 documented the facility must focus on assisting the resident in maintaining and enhancing their self-esteem and self-worth. Each resident was to be treated with respect and dignity. The facility policy Wheelchairs dated 9/7/2023 documented wheelchairs were issued by the therapy department. Wheelchair maintenance was performed by the maintenance department in conjunction with therapy and adaptations included headrests. Wheelchairs would be cleaned according to policy. 1) Resident #33 had diagnoses including osteoarthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00315667) surveys conducted 11/13/2023-11/17/2023, the facility did not ensure that prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances that residents may have for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #31) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #31 ordered a streaming device that was delivered to the facility, the resident did not receive the device, and the facility did not reimburse the resident for the missing item. Findings include: The facility policy, Grievances last reviewed 4/20/2023, documented complaints and/or grievances may be submitted orally or in writing. Upon receipt of a complaint or grievance, staff must immediately attempt to address and resolve the issue. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, cerebral infarction (stroke), and depression. The 8/5/2023 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented the resident had intact cognition, required extensive assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs) and did not have behavioral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to UPSTATE SERVICES GROUP — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY