Colonial Park Rehabilitation And Nursing Center
950 Floyd Avenue, Rome, NY 13440 · For profit - Partnership · 80 certified beds · (315) 336-5400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2022
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $58,988 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-20)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.6% | 14.1% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.7% | 5.8% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.1% | 0.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 1.3% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.3% | 19.5% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.9% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.6% | 12.5% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.0% | 13.2% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 11.5% | 6.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.8% | 19.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.7% | 13.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 47.8% | 78.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.9% | 20.6% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 20.5% | 9.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.55 | 1.70 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.88 | 1.36 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
37.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 37.8%CMS range 27.8–52.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.1%CMS range 8.7–17.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 70.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 78.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.1%CMS range 4.8–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 76.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.51 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00321800), the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #3, who was previously diagnosed with brain cancer, had recommendations for a magnetic resonance imaging scan (specialized x-ray) and follow-up with oncology (cancer specialist) and neurology (doctor who specializes in diseases of the brain/spinal cord), and there was no documented evidence the follow-up appointment or scan was scheduled or occurred. Subsequently, the resident experienced a decline in their neurological function. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #3 that was not immediate jeopardy. Finding include: The revised 1/2024 Consultation Policy documented the facility was responsible to provide consultation services for any resident as needed. The facility assumed responsibility for obtaining services that met professional standards…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a process was in place for residents to have their grievances addressed appropriately for 79 of 79 residents residing in the facility. Specifically, information on how to file a grievance and grievance forms were not available to the residents and the facility did not have a process for residents to file an anonymous grievance. Additionally, six (6) of six (6) anonymous residents present at the resident group meeting stated they did not know if there were grievance forms or where they would be located, of their right to file anonymously, did not know who the grievance officer was, and resident council concerns were not addressed. Findings include:The facility policy Grievances/Complaints, Filing, revised 01/2026, documented residents and their representatives had the right to file grievances concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding their stay at the facility. Grievances may also be voiced or filed regarding care that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews (iQIES Intakes 2807999 and 473681) the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for two (2) of six (6) residents (Residents #7 and #64) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #7 had significant weight loss, weights were not obtained as ordered, and there was no documented evidence a medical provider addressed the resident's weight loss; Resident #64 did not receive their nutritional supplements as ordered, had a decline in their eating abilities, and was not assisted at meals. Findings include:The undated facility policy Comprehensive Nutrition Assessment, documented the Clinical Nutrition team would clarify nutrition issues, needs, and goals in the context of the individual's overall condition. Health care practitioners would help define the nature of the problem, identify causes of nutrition problems (i.e. anorexia and weight loss), tailor interventions to the individual's specific causes and situation, monitor the continued relevance of those interventions.The undated facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews (iQIES intake 2963932), the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that met their daily nutritional needs for six (6) anonymous residents and two (2) of two (2) meals (the 04/15/2026 and 04/16/2026 lunch meals) reviewed. Specifically, the 04/15/2026 lunch meal had hot and cold food served outside of the appropriate temperature range; the 04/16/2026 lunch meal tray had missing food items, missing adaptive meal equipment, and food items were not serviced at palatable temperatures and the 04/16/2026 replacement lunch meal was missing items, the appropriate adaptive equipment was not provided, and the meal ticket directions were not followed; and six (6) anonymous residents present at the resident group meeting stated the food was often cold and the meal tray did not match the meal tickets. Findings include:The undated facility policy Accuracy and Quality of Tray Line Service, documented all meals were checked by food service personnel for accuracy, and by the employees serving the meals prior to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to consult with the physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical status for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #3) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #3 had significant weight gain, weights were not obtained as ordered, there was no documented evidence that the physician was notified of a significant weight gain, and the resident was hospitalized .Findings include:The facility policy Change of Resident Condition, revised 01/2025, documented the nurse would notify the physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical/ emotional/mental condition. A significant change of condition was a major decline or improvement in the resident status that would not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff. Resident #3 had diagnoses including heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage 4 and hypertension. The 04/01/2026 Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) documented the resident had intact cognition, weighed 159 pounds,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of clinical practice for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #7) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #7 regularly refused their ordered inhaler and nebulizer treatments (respiratory treatments) and there was no documented evidence the physician was notified of the refusals or reviewed the resident's medication administration records during their monthly visits; there was no documented evidence the irregularity of the refused medications were noted by the pharmacist during their monthly medication reviews; and there was no documented evidence of a care plan related to the resident's refusals of their medications. Findings include: The facility policy Medication Orders, last reviewed 01/2025, documented each resident must be under the care of a licensed physician authorized to practice medicine in this state and must be seen by the physician at least every sixty days. A current list of orders must be maintained in the clinical record of each resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #85) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #85 was admitted to the facility, was not assessed by a registered nurse until three (3) days later on the day they were discharged against medical advice; physician orders were not completed; treatments were not provided as ordered; diagnostic testing was not completed as ordered; and care was not provided for two (2) of nine (9) shifts during the residents admission. Additionally, when the resident was discharged against medical advice there was no documented evidence of who the resident left with, if education was provided to the resident, and if a medical provider was notified. Findings include: There was no documented evidence of a policy addressing admission assessments by a registered nurse. The undated facility admission Agreement documented residents received basic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews (IQIES Intake 2577870), the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #64) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #64's wound treatments were not completed as ordered.Findings include:The facility policy Wound Care, reviewed 01/2025, documented during wound care preparation, staff should verify there was a physician's order for the procedure, review the resident's care plan to assess any special needs of the resident, and assemble the equipment and supplies as ordered to perform the procedure. Following the procedure, information should be documented in the resident's medical record. If the resident refused the treatment, document the reason why and notify the supervisor.Resident #64 had diagnoses including dementia, adult failure to thrive (overall physical decline), and a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were fed by enteral means (tube feeding, delivery of nutrition directly to the stomach or small intestine) received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #52) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #52's tube feeding was not infusing at the ordered rate; they did not receive their water flushes as ordered; their tube feeding was not dated: and their tube feeding pump was unclean with brownish streaks on the monitor. Findings include: The facility policy Enteral Feeding Via Continuous Pump, revised 03/2022, documented to verify the physician order and connect the infusion pump set rate, and press start. The facility policy did not document dating and timing of tube feeding when administered. Resident #52 had diagnoses including cerebral palsy (neurological disorders affecting movement), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and Alzheimer's Disease. The 04/16/2026, Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis (used to filter waste products from the blood when the kidneys do not work properly) received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #4) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #4 received hemodialysis treatments at a community-based dialysis center and did not have on-going assessments and oversight before and after dialysis treatments including assessment of the dialysis access site.Findings include: The facility policy Dialysis, last reviewed 01/2025, documented a communication log was be used for each resident that leaves the building for the dialysis center to communicate the resident's needs and response to dialysis treatment. The facility was to track and follow up. The policy did not include assessing the dialysis access sites or vital signs.Resident #4 had diagnoses including end-stage renal (kidney) disease. The 02/12/2026 Minimum Data Set assessment (a health status assessment tool) documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #49) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #49 exhibited behavioral disturbances, did not have a personalized care plan to address triggers or personalized interventions, and the facility did not coordinate with outside behavioral health services for continuity of care. Findings include: There was no documented evidence of a comprehensive care plan policy and an initial care plan policy. Resident #49 had diagnoses including bipolar disorder (fluctuating mood shifts), severe psychotic features (loss of contact with reality), cerebral palsy (movement disorder caused by abnormal brain development or damage), and anxiety. The 03/26/2026 Minimum Data Set documented the resident had intact cognition, had moderate depression, had no behaviors, required moderate assistance or was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated (iQIES reference number 2610929) survey the facility did not ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 had a physician order for intravenous (directly into a vein) cefepime and vancomycin (antibiotics) every 12 hours that were not administered on 04/10/2025, 04/13/2025, 04/14/2025, 04/15/2025, 04/18/2025, and 04/19/2025.Findings include:The facility policy Administering Medications, reviewed 01/2025 documented medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. Medications must be administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified. If a drug was withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication should document in the electronic Medication Administration Record for that drug and dose. The person who withheld,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated (iQIES reference number 2610929) survey the facility did not ensure laboratory services were obtained to meet the needs of its residents for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 had physician orders for laboratory tests to check their vancomycin (antibiotic) trough level (blood test used to monitor the antibiotic's effectiveness and to minimize toxicity) and the laboratory tests were not performed timely or accurately. Findings include:The facility policy Vancomycin Management, dated 01/2025, documented renal function should be monitored at least twice weekly or more frequently based on physician orders. Trough level monitoring should be completed to ensure adequate serum levels for efficacy while avoiding toxicity. Lab draw should happen within 30 minutes prior to the fourth dose, after dose adjustments, significant changes in renal function, or during prolonged therapy. With prolonged therapy testing should be repeated every 3-5 fays or per physician orders. Nursing would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00334012), the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #2 did not receive medications as ordered on multiple occasions. Findings include: The facility policy, Medication Administration, revised 1/2024, documented the nurse should document all medications administered to each resident on the resident's medication administration record. Documentation must include name and strength of the drug, dosage, method of administration, date and time, and reason(s) why a medication was withheld, not administered, or refused. In the event a medication pass time had passed, the nurse would inform the medical professional and obtain orders to either give the medication, hold, or discontinue. The nurse must inform the Nursing Supervisor of the medication administration event. Resident #2 had diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00340720) surveys conducted 7/15/2024-7/22/2024, the facility did not ensure they had a process in place for residents to have their grievances addressed appropriately for 13 of 13 (12 anonymous residents, and Resident #16) reviewed. Specifically, 12 anonymous residents present at the Resident Council meeting stated they did not know who the grievance officer was, how grievances were handled, or receive communication on the progress of grievance resolutions; and Resident #16 filed a grievance regarding a care concern that was not resolved. Findings include: The facility policy, Filing Grievance Complaints, last reviewed 1/2024, documented the facility must establish a grievance policy that ensured the prompt resolution of all grievances regarding the residents' rights. The facility assisted residents in filing grievances and/or complaints when such requests were made. The facility notified residents individually or through postings in prominent locations throughout the facility of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 7/15/2024-7/22/2024, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Specifically, hot food was improperly cooled, the mechanical dishwasher was not functioning as designed, and outdated foods were present in the walk-in cooler. Findings include: The facility policy, Food Safety and Sanitation dated as reviewed 1/2024, documented leftovers were used within 72 hours (or discarded). The facility policy, Cleaning Dishes/Dish Machine, dated as reviewed 1/2023 documented the dish machine would be checked prior to meals to assure proper functioning and appropriate temperatures for cleaning and sanitizing. The facility Cook/Time Temperature Cooling Log revised 12/1/2017, documented items had 2 hours to decrease from 135 degrees Fahrenheit to 70 degrees Fahrenheit and 4 hours to decrease from 70 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 7/15/2024-7/22/2024, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the expiration date when applicable for 3 of 3 medication carts (Unit 1- medication cart 1, Unit 2- medication cart 1, and Unit 2- medication cart 2) reviewed. Specifically, - Unit 1- medication cart 1 contained 7 medications that were not labeled with resident specific identifiers or with opened/ discard dates; 7 resident specific multidose insulin (treats blood sugar) pens, 1 multidose eye drop, and 1 multidose eye ointment that were not labeled with opened and discard dates; and 1 unopened insulin pen that was not stored appropriately in the refrigerator. - Unit 2- medication cart 1 contained 1 multidose insulin pen that was not labeled with resident specific information and 1 resident specific multidose insulin pen that was not labeled with an opened or discard date. - Unit 2- medication cart 2 contained stock…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 7/15/2024-7/22/2024, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #59) reviewed. Specifically, staff was observed not wearing the required personal protective equipment in Resident #59's room who was on transmission-based precautions. Findings include: The undated facility policy. Isolation-Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions, documented transmission-based precautions were additional measures that protected staff, visitors, and other residents from becoming infected. When a resident was placed on transmission-based precautions, appropriate notification was placed on the room entrance door, so personnel and visitors were aware of the need for the type of precaution. The signage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00340720) surveys conducted 7/15/2024-7/22/2024, the facility did not immediately inform the resident's representative when there was a need to commence a new treatment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #525). Specifically, Resident #525 was prescribed an antibiotic for symptoms of infection and the resident's representative was not notified. Findings include: The facility policy, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, last revised 1/2024, documented the facility promptly notified the resident, their attending physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. Except in medical emergencies, notifications were made within 24 hours of a change that occurred in the resident's medical/mental condition or status. Resident #525 had diagnoses including stroke, sacral (lower back) pressure ulcer, and a history of infections. The 4/16/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had severely impaired cognition, had a urinary tract infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 7/15/2024-7/22/2024, the facility did not ensure residents were provided an ongoing program to support their choice of activities, designed to meet their interests and support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #3) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #3 was not provided a large print Bible or glasses to meet their interests and preferences. Findings include: The facility policy, Activity Programs, effective 1/2022, documented activity programs were designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Activities offered were based on the comprehensive resident based assessment and the preferences of each resident. Adequate space and equipment were provided to ensure that needed services identified in the resident's plan of care were met. Resident #3 had diagnoses including left sided hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness to one side of the body), unspecified visual loss, and depression. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 7/15/2024-7/22/2024, the facility did not ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 of 3 residents (Residents # 27and #67) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #27 and #67 had physician orders for air low air loss mattresses (a specialty mattress that provides air flow to relieve pressure) that did not include settings and were not monitored to ensure appropriate settings for current weights. Findings include: The undated facility policy, Air Mattress Guidelines, documented a low air loss mattress was a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds. Residents were assessed for the appropriateness of an air mattress upon admission based on risk factors and /or the existence of actual or history of pressure injuries. An air mattress was provided to those residents to prevent skin breakdown, promote…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00314958) surveys conducted 7/15/2024-7/22/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #7) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #7 had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and was care planned for line-of-sight supervision for meals with specific swallowing strategies and was observed eating a meal alone in their room. Findings include: The facility policy, Meal Observation, reviewed 1/2024, documented nursing provided supervision and observation during mealtime, in dining areas and patient/ resident rooms. Staff ensured all residents received the appropriate consistency altered diets as ordered. The facility policy, Assistance with Meals, reviewed 1/2024, documented residents received assistance with meals in a manner that met the individual needs of each resident. Facility staff helped residents who required assistance with eating. Residents were fed with attention to safety, comfort, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 7/15/2024-7/22/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #19). Specifically, Resident #19's bilevel positive airway pressure machine (non-invasive mechanical ventilator that applies pressure to keep airway open when sleeping) was not cleaned per professional standards. Findings include: The facility policy CPAP/BiPAP Support [continuous positive airway pressure/bilevel positive airway pressure] , revised 1/2024, documented specific cleaning instructions were obtained from the manufacturer/supplier. The machine was to be cleaned once a week and as needed. The mask, nasal pillow, and tubing were to be cleaned daily using warm soapy water and allowed to air dry. Resident #19 had diagnoses including respiratory failure, sleep apnea (breathing stops and starts during sleep), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease). The 6/18/2024 Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 7/15/2024-7/22/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents who required dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) services received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #59) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #59 received hemodialysis treatments at a community-based dialysis center and did not have on-going assessments and oversight before and after dialysis treatments including assessment of the dialysis access site. Additionally, there was not consistent ongoing communication and collaboration between the facility and the dialysis center. Findings include: The 10/21/2021 facility Dialysis Service Agreement with the community-based dialysis center documented the care facility agreed to furnish all appropriate medical information including current treatments and medications provided to the resident. The facility policy, Dialysis Communication, last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted 7/15/2024-7/22/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for 2 of 2 test tray meals (the 7/16/2024 lunch meal and the 7/18/2024 lunch meal) reviewed; and for 12 of 12 anonymous residents present at the Resident Council meeting. Specifically, the 7/16/2024 and 7/18/2024 lunch meals were not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures and were not flavorful; the 7/18/2024 lunch meal test tray contained a foreign substance and had a missing item. Additionally, 12 of 12 anonymous residents at the Resident Council meeting stated the food was not flavorful, was not served at appetizing and palatable temperatures, and often had missing items; and Resident #15 stated the food was often flavorless. Findings include: The facility policy, The Dining Experience, reviewed 1/2024 documented the dining experience enhanced each individual's quality of life by providing nourishing, palatable, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00312863), the facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 had a significant weight loss that was not addressed by clinical nutrition staff. Additionally, the resident was not consistently provided with their ordered nutritional supplement. Findings include: The 1/2024 Weight Assessment and Intervention Policy documented the dietitian would review the weight record. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight would be retaken the next day for confirmation. At the discretion of the dietitian, in conjunction with the resident's presentation and team assessment, additional reweights may be requested. The dietitian would respond within 7 days upon receipt of notification of a weight change depending on the severity of the weight change. Resident #1 had diagnoses including failure to thrive and dementia. The 7/26/2022 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident's cognition was severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00258908, NY00291516, NY00276440, NY00296424, NY00286768, and NY00285103) conducted 5/31/22-6/3/22, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 2 resident units (A and B units) reviewed. Specifically, there were loose and unclean handrails, unclean floors, and walls and furniture in disrepair on the A (100s) and B (200s) units. Findings include: The facility policy Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces reviewed 1/2022 documented non-critical items were those that come in contact with intact skin. Non-critical environmental surfaces included bed rails, bedside tables, furniture, and floors. Housekeeping surfaces such as floors would be cleaned on a regular basis and when surfaces were visibly soiled. The following observations were made on 5/31/22: - at 9:24 AM the Unit B kitchenette floor was sticky. - at 10:05 AM the floor in room [ROOM NUMBER]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the abbreviated (NY00290033) and recertification surveys conducted from 5/31/22-6/3/22, the facility failed to protect residents from abuse for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #26 and 47). Specifically, Resident #4 exhibited sexually inappropriate behaviors towards Residents #26 and 47 and a plan of care was not developed and implemented to protect Residents #26 and 47 from further abuse. Findings include: The facility's policy Abuse Prevention Program/Abuse and Neglect- Clinical Protocol/Abuse Investigation and Reporting revised 1/2022 documented the facility's residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This included sexual or physical abuse. The facility was to develop and implement policies and procedures to aid in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of the residents. The facility was to implement measures to address factors that may lead to abusive situations and protect residents during abuse investigations. The facility policy Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00286768 and NY00296424) conducted 5/31/22-6/3/22, the facility failed to ensure food and drink was palatable, attractive, and at safe and appetizing temperatures for 2 of 2 meal test trays, and for 1 meal service in the kitchen. Specifically, 2 lunch meal test trays and several food items on the kitchen lunch service line had hot and cold food items that were not maintained at safe temperatures and the food did not taste appetizing or palatable. Findings include: The facility policy General HACCP (Hazard analysis and critical control points) Guidelines updated 1/2022 documented food must be held greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or less than 41 degrees F. Check to be sure the staff take food temperatures and take them accurately. The facility's Daily Mealtime Temperature Log documented the following: - the acceptable hot holding temperature range was 140-180 degrees F. - on 5/19 - dinner hot foods: rice, hamburger, BBQ ribwich, spinach, and mashed potatoes had recorded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-03 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00296424) conducted from 5/31/22-6/3/22, the facility failed to ensure that the discharge needs of each resident were identified and resulted in the development of a discharge plan for each resident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #174) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #174 was discharged to home following a rehabilitation admission and did not have home care services set up at the time of discharge. Findings include: The facility policy Discharge Summary and Plan revised 1/2022 documented when the facility anticipates a resident's discharge to a private residence, another nursing care facility, a discharge summary, and a post-discharge plan will be developed which will assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment. The post-discharge plan would be developed by the Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team with the assistance of the resident and his or her family and would include: - Where the individual plans to reside. - Arrangements that have been made for follow-up care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00258908, NY00265830, NY00291516, NY00274357, NY00264477) conducted 5/31/22-6/3/22, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident # 24). Specifically, Resident # 24 was not provided timely incontinence care as planned. Findings include: The facility policy Certified Nursing Aide Documentation, reviewed 1/2022 documented all care will be delivered as per the resident's plan of care/[NAME] (care instructions). Resident #24 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), diabetes, and acute kidney failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had intact cognition, did not reject care, required extensive assistance of 2 for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, was frequently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted on 5/31/22-6/3/22, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #32 and 38) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #32 and 38, both on aspiration precautions, were unsupervised and not positioned safely during meals. Additionally, Resident #32 was not provided the correct diet consistency during an observed lunch meal. Findings include: The facility Aspiration Precautions policy, reviewed 3/2022, documented all licensed and unlicensed personnel will be instructed in and take appropriate precautions to minimize the risk of aspirations in residents. Residents noted with aspiration precautions in place must be fed within direct supervision of a licensed personnel. Residents unless otherwise specified will be fed in an upright position and left in this position post feeding to avoid aspiration. Ensure residents receive the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 5/31/22-6/3/22, the facility failed to store and label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions for 1 of 2 (A-1 medication cart) medication carts reviewed. Specifically, controlled drugs were not stored in the separately locked compartment in the A-1 medication cart. Findings include: The facility policy Medication: Controlled Substances revised 1/2022, documented: - The facility should comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling and storage of controlled substances; - Only authorized licensed nursing should have access to controlled drugs maintained on premises; and - Controlled substances must be stored in the medication room in a locked container. This container must remain locked at all times, except when it was accessed to obtain medications for residents. During a medication storage observation of the A-1 medication cart on 6/1/22 at 1:03 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-03 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00286768 and NY296424) conducted 5/31/22-6/3/22, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Residents #17) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #17 had a gluten allergy (a protein found in grains), and the resident was served mashed potatoes instead of gluten free pasta listed on the approved menu. Findings included: The facility policy Nutritional Assessment revised 1/2022 documented the nutritional assessment would be conducted by the multidisciplinary team and shall identify at least the following components: food restrictions, including food allergies and cultural or religious practices affecting food choices. The undated facility policy Menu Substitution documented a menu substitute would be provided when an uncontrollable situation, such as inventory shortage, had temporarily made the item unavailable. Decisions on menu substitutions would be made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-03 · tag F0888 — isolatedEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 5/31/22-6/3/22, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that all staff are fully vaccinated for COVID-19 and include a process for ensuring the implementation of additional precautions, intended to mitigate the transmission, and spread of COVID-19 for 1 of 11 staff (licensed practical nurse [LPN] #10) reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not implement their contingency plan for LPN #10 who was not vaccinated for COVID-19 due to an exemption based on clinical contraindications. Findings include: The facility policy COVID-19 Vaccination Requirements for Staff and Residents revised 2/22, documented those staff who were not yet fully vaccinated or had been granted an exemption or accommodation as authorized by law must adhere to additional precautions that were intended to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. The facility may implement the following to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission: - Requiring twice weekly testing for exempted staff. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-04-17 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure the results of the most recent Federal and State surveys were posted in a place readily accessible where individuals who wished to examine the survey results did not have to ask for them. Specifically, the facility did not provide records for the standard health survey results or any complaint survey results and subsequently, there was no posted notification of the availability of the previous three (3) years of survey reports. Findings include:The New York State Department of Health Your Rights as a Nursing Home Resident in New York State documented residents had the right to read the results of the most recent State and Federal inspection survey and the facility's plan to correct any violations. During an anonymous resident group meeting on 04/14/2026 at 2:00 PM, six residents stated they had never seen any previous survey results and did not know where they were located. During a walk-through of the entire facility on 04/14/2026 at 11:22 AM and on 04/15/2026 at 10:22 AM, there was no posted notification of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-04-17 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted daily at the beginning of each shift and included the daily current resident census and the total number, and actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift in a prominent location readily accessible to residents and visitors for four (4) of four (4) days (04/14/2026, 04/15/2026, 04/16/2026, and 04/17/2026) reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not post the daily nurse staffing on 04/14/2026 and the posted daily nurse staffing on 04/15/2026, 04/16/2026, and 04/17/2026 did not include the resident census and actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care as required.Findings include:The undated facility policy Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, documented the facility would post the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents on a daily basis for each shift. The information recorded on the form should include: the name…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-04-17 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility did not provide the appropriate liability and appeal notices to Medicare beneficiaries for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #93) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #93 remained in the facility after discontinuation of Medicare Part A services and the facility did not provide the resident with timely Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-10123) when Medicare Part A coverage was ending, nor a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-10055) for Medicare Part A, as required.Findings include: The undated facility policy Advance Beneficiary Notification and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage, documented the facility follows the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines for both the Advance Beneficiary Notification and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage. When a resident is no longer eligible for skilled coverage under Medicare Part A, the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$58,988 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $58,988 — penalty dated 2024-03-20
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-06 for 41 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to UPSTATE SERVICES GROUP — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOENIG, URI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | 60% | since 02/28/2012 |
| STEIF, EFRAIM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 40% | since 06/24/2011 |
| CAMEROTA, DAVID | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/22/2010 |
| WUERTZER, AMY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/14/2017 |
| DECK, FREDRICK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/18/2026 |
| FARNSWORTH, WAYNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/25/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $753K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335233. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.