Otterbein Union Township

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 37.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 54.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.96 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on record review, staff interview, review of self-reported incidents (SRI), review of witness statements, review of personnel files, review of X-ray results, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #32 was transferred per physician orders and in a manner consistent with her plan of care. This resulted in Actual Harm on 06/22/25 at 4:01 P.M. when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #168 attempted to transfer Resident #32 from the bed to a wheelchair by carrying her without additional staff and without the use of a mechanical Hoyer lift. CNA #168 tripped and fell with Resident #32 and the resident sustained an acute fracture of the right humerus, with mild displacement, and soft tissue swelling. This affected one (Resident #32) of the three residents reviewed for falls. The facility identified 11 additional residents who were dependent on a mechanical lift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2022-08-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to verify a resident's (Resident #55) identity prior to medication administration, resulting in Resident #55 being given another resident's medication. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #55 had a subsequent episode of vomiting and lethargy, leading to the resident being transferred to the emergency room. Additionally, the facility failed to administer pain medication in a timely manner and as ordered by the physician for Resident #107. This affected two (Residents #55 and #107) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 58. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #55 revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular disorder of intestine, chronic kidney disease, essential hypertension, other iron deficiency anemias, unspecified asthma, dyspnea, nonrheumatic mitral valve stenosis, aphasia, asthma, and arthropathy.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to ensure resident care conferences were held quarterly for all residents. This affected Residents #1, #4, #5, #7, #9, #10, #36, and #51. The facility census was 51 at the time of survey. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, type II diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, and acute kidney failure. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of Resident #4's medical records revealed that one care conference was documented on 08/29/25 with no further care documentation of care conferences. Interview on 01/14/26 at 1:50 P.M. with Social Service Director (SSD) #125 verified Resident #4 had no further care conferences for 2025. 2.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program. This affected four residents,(Residents #42, #15, #39 and #16) of four residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 51.Findings Include: 1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension and diabetes mellitus type II, Resident #16 currently serves as the House Council President. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Medicare Five-Day assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had intact cognition and was occasionally incontinent of bowel and always incontinent of bladder. The resident required set up assistance for eating, moderate assistance for oral hygiene, bed mobility and transfers, and maximal assistance for personal hygiene, toileting, bathing and dressing. The resident required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0680 — pattern
  Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an activity program directed by a qualified professional. This had the potential to affect 50 residents of the 51 residents receiving the activity program. This did not affect Resident #22. The facility census total was 51. Findings Include: Findings include: Review of personnel file of hired Activity Director, (AD) #90 revealed the AD #90 was hired on 10/21/25. The AD #90 was not licensed or registered by the state. The was no evidence the AD #90 had met the qualifications to be the Activities Director. There was a payment invoice dated on 01/14/26 the AD #90 had been paid to be enrolled in the certification for activity professional.Interviewed with Resident #22 on 01/12/26 at 8:30 A.M. revealed she did not want to attend any activities and did not want any activities provided to her. She wanted left alone in her room and was satisfied with visits from her family.Interview on 01/13/26 at 4:00 P.M. , AD #90 verified she had not met the qualifications to be the Activity Director when she was hired and has not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN) prior to discharge from Medicare Part A services as required. This affected one (Resident #39) of two residents reviewed for ABNs. The facility census was 51.Findings include: Review of SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review document for Resident #39 revealed Resident #39 was not issued a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN) Form prior to discharge from Medicare Part A services on 09/29/25. Interview on 01/14/25 at 12:58 PM with the Administrator verified Resident #39, who remained in the facility after the discontinuation of Medicare Part A services on 09/29/25, was not issued the Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN) Form.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide equipment to prevent physical decline . This affected two residents,(Residents #24 and #42) of two residents reviewed for equipment to prevent physical decline. The facility census was 51. Findings Include: Record review of Resident #24 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #24 include Alzheimer's disease, malnutrition, osteoporosis, adult failure to thrive, and congested heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and required extensive staff assistance for Activities of Daily Living skills. The resident received hospice care. The resident had physician orders for positioning device to left hand as tolerated and pressure relieving boots at all times as tolerated. Observation on 01/12/26 and 01/13/26 from approximately 9:00 A.M. to 3:30 P.M.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide adaptive feeding devices as ordered by the physician. This affected two residents (Residents #22 and #42) of two residents for adaptive feeding utensils. The facility census was 51.Findings Include:1.Record review of Resident #42 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #42 include heart failure, malnutrition, myocardial infarction, quadriplegia, and stenosis of carotid artery and left leg amputation. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated 12/20 25 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required assistance for feeding. The resident received a regular diet with a order for a built up plate and spoons only. Review of admission notes of 01/05/24 revealed the Resident #42 was admitted with right and left had contractures.Review of plan of care revealed the resident was to receive a plate with sides and spoons at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store foods in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 51 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 51. Findings include:Observation on 01/12/22 at 8:55 A.M. with Diet Technician #50 revealed the following concerns in House #16's kitchen. 1. An unopened container of cottage cheese with expiration date 01/10/26. 2. Opened cottage cheese opened date of 12/01/26 and expiration date of 02/27/26. Two containers of opened yogurt, one opened 01/08/26 with expiration date of 02/21/26 and the other container labeled opened on 01/01/26 and expiration date of 02/06/26. No containers had a use by or discard date labeled on the containers.3. Review of the food temperature monitor logs revealed on 01/09/26, all three meals had no food temperatures recorded, 01/07/26 had no breakfast temperatures recorded, and 01/10/26 had no breakfast and lunch meal temperatures recorded.4. Review of the dishwasher log of 01/01/26 through 01/11/26 revealed there were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, incident investigation review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the appropriate level of assistance during resident transfers. This affected one (Resident #34) of the four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 58 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 11/07/2023 with diagnoses including heart failure and morbid obesity. Review of the plan of care for Resident #34 dated 11/07/23 revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to impaired mobility, history of falls, history of a fractured femur, and obesity. Interventions included to ensure two staff members provided all check and change care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #34 dated 06/19/24 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required complete staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, review of manufacture directions, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store foods in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Observation on 08/01/22 at 8:30 A.M. with Diet Technician #31 revealed the following concerns in House #16's kitchen. 1. Two containers of unidentifiable food, unlabeled and undated. 2. Three quarters of a chocolate pie in a pie pan uncovered and undated. 3. Opened potato salad, undated. 4. Container of opened applesauce, undated. 5. Open container of pineapple undated. 6. Container of opened chicken broth, undated. 7. No thermometer in reach of the refrigerator. 8. An undated pan of partially served brownies. Observation on 08/01/22 at 8:45 A.M. with Diet Technician #31 revealed the following concerns in House #17's kitchen: 1. Container of opened applesauce, undated. 2. Container of opened beef broth with expiration date of 07/27/22. 3. Undated open container of cranberry juice. 4.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-08-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, resident interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet the needs of the residents. This affected one (Resident #107) and had the potential to affect twelve residents (#207, #47, #46, #156, #206, #111, #106, #107, #45, #108, #40 and #31) who resided in House #15. The facility census was 58. Findings included: During initial tour of the facility on 08/01/22 from 8:15 A.M. through 9:20 A.M. revealed the facility had five separate homes. Each home was licensed for twelve residents. There were two nurses, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #92 and Registered Agency Nurse (RN) #120 and eight State Tested Nurse Aides (STNA) (#8, #9, #35, #38, #46, #52, #76, and #82) present in the facility to care for 58 residents residing in the five houses. Review of Resident #107's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/17/22. Diagnoses included pneumonia, hypertension, osteoarthritis, cardiomegaly, gout, presence of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$7,008 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $7,008 — penalty dated 2025-08-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OTTERBEIN SENIORLIFE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $391K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH