Otterbein Springboro

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 138 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 57.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.44 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.02 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.54 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were locked. This affected one of four medication carts observed and had the potential to affect 11 Residents (#5, #7, #14, #15, #18, #33, #34, #52, #54, #55, and #57) whose medications were stored in the cart. The facility census was 57.Findings include: Observation of the 300 cottage medication cart on 04/30/26 at 8:10 A.M. revealed it was unlocked and a nurse was not visible near the unsecured medication cart. Interview and observation on 04/30/26 at 8:12 A.M., the Administrator verified the 300 cottage medication cart was unlocked and a nurse was not present in the cottage. The Administrator verified Residents' (#5, #7, #14, #15, #18, #33, #34, #52, #54, #55, #57) medications were stored in the cart. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility dated May 2022 revealed medication and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and review of the week at a glance menu, the facility failed to ensure the menu portion sizes were followed. This affected twelve (Resident #09, #10, #16, #19, #20, #32, #35, #37, #39, #40, #41 and #51) out of 57 residents that resided in the facility. The facility census was 57. Findings Include:Review of the facility's a week at a glance menu for house 9349 dated 04/27/26 revealed residents on a regular and bite sized diets were to receive five ounces of grilled chicken, four ounces of broccoli, a half of a cup of rice pilaf and one breadstick for lunch on 04/27/26.Observation of the kitchen in house 9349 on 04/27/26 at 12:36 P.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #166 was serving residents on regular diets two scoops of broccoli using an unlabeled spoon, a scoop of rice using an unlabeled spoon, a piece of chicken that she cut in half and a breadstick. The CNA #166 was serving residents on bite size diets two scoops of broccoli using an unlabeled spoon, a scoop of rice using an unlabeled spoon, a piece of chicken that she cut in half…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, facility documentation, review of manufacturers recommendations, and policy review, the facility failed to serve food in a manner that protected against cross-contamination. This affected 21 (Residents #5, #7, #14, #15, #18, #27, #33, #34, #52, #54, #55, #56, #57, #64, #65, #66, #68, #69, #70, #71, and #72) residents. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain appropriate dishwashing equipment. This had the potential to affect 12 (Residents #2, #6, #8, #22, #23, #28, #30, #31, #46, #48, #49, and #50) residents in unit 9335. The facility census was 57.Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/27/26 from 12:13 P.M. to 12:23 P.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #124 donned blue disposable gloves and prepared food plates for ten (#27, #56, #64, #65, #66, #68, #69, #70, #71, and #72) residents on the rehab unit including one sloppy joe sandwich, one scoop of macaroni and cheese, one prepared garden salad, and one prepared cup of canned fruit. CNA #124 prepared each sandwich by reaching into a bag with her gloved hands, retrieving a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the resident funds accounting record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were conveyed within 30 days of discharge from the facility. This affected one (Resident #73) out of five residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 57.Findings Included:Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed Resident #73 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, adult failure to thrive, osteoarthritis, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, dementia moderate with agitation, and anxiety disorder. Resident #73 discharged from the facility on 10/13/25. Review of Resident #73's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #73's resident funds authorization dated 10/03/22 revealed Resident #73's Power of Attorney (POA) authorized Resident #73 to have a resident funds account at the facility. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had an activities care plan. This affected one (Resident #23) out of 20 residents sampled. The facility census was 57.Findings Included: Review of Resident #23's medical record review revealed Resident #23 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with late onset, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, incisional hernia with obstruction without gangrene, hypertension, pure hypercholesterolemia, sleep apnea, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, acute kidney failure, restlessness and agitation, other vitamin B12 deficiency, iron deficiency anemia, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #23's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans reflected resident's needs regarding tube feeding. This affected one (Resident #3) out of four residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 57.Findings Included:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies and dysphagia oropharyngeal phase. Review of the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 has severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00. Resident #3 was dependent for activities of daily living (ADLs) and required a Hoyer lift for transfers.Review of Resident #3's physician's orders and medication administration record revealed the resident was receiving Jevity 1.5 at 30 milliliters (ml) per hour via gastrostomy tube.Review of the care plan dated 02/07/26 revealed Resident #3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of manufacturer's instructions, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure insulin pen administration devices were primed. This affected one (Resident #37) out of three residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 57.Findings include:Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed an admission of 05/14/25. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease, and dementia.Review of an annual minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had moderately impaired cognition and received insulin injections.Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 09/26/25 for Admelog SoloStar (a rapid acting insulin) 100 units per milliliter (unit/ml) solution pen-injector. Inject six units subcutaneously before meals related to type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. Observation on 04/29/26 at 7:31 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #312 prepared Resident #37's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP) for residents with wounds. This affected two (Residents #67 and #68) of four residents observed for infection control. In addition, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand sanitization during wound treatments. This affected one (Resident #51) of two residents sampled for wound care. The facility census was 57.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified fracture of the lumbar vertebra, rheumatoid arthritis, and obstructive sleep apnea.admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment not yet completed. Review of the care plan dated 04/24/26 revealed Resident #67 had impaired skin integrity related to surgical wound to back. Interventions included applying back brace for comfort, administering treatments as ordered, completing weekly skin checks, providing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations, the facility failed to ensure a pneumococcal vaccine was offered to a resident. This affected one (Resident #43) out of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 57.Findings Included:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #43 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, dysphagia, hyperlipidemia, spinal stenosis, heart failure, constipation, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, major depressive disorder, epilepsy, generalized anxiety disorder and insomnia.Review of Resident #43's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required set up assistance with eating. Resident #43 required supervision with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of employee orientation documents, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect four facility-identified cognitively impaired and independently-mobile (Residents #4, #6, #18, #22) of 12 residents residents residing in the house. The facility census was 58 residents. Findings include: Observation on 09/22/25 at 9:12 A.M revealed there was pot of eggs cooking in a boiling water on top of gas stove in the house kitchen. The gates to prevent entry to the kitchen were opened, and the kitchen was unattended by staff. Interview on 09/22/25 at 9:13 A.M with the Administrator confirmed there was an unsupervised gas stove on with a pot of eggs cooking with the kitchen gates opened. The Administrator also confirmed that the stove should never be left unattended while on and that the kitchen gates are supposed to be closed when the kitchen is left unattended or when the stove is in use.Interview on 09/22/25 at 9:55 A.M with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #105 confirmed staff never leave the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OTTERBEIN SENIORLIFE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $374K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH