Otterbein Portage Valley

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 45.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-11-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital documentation, observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) guidance, the facility failed to complete accurate skin assessments, provide ongoing monitoring of pressure ulcers, failed to obtain treatment orders for pressure ulcers, and failed to provide a treatment to pressure ulcers for one resident (#39). This resulted in actual harm when Resident #39's left heel unstageable pressure ulcer had an increase in the amount of necrotic tissue present from 25% to 100% within eleven days. This affected one (#39) of one resident reviewed for pressure sores. The facility identified three residents with pressure sores. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/22/22 and a readmission date of 11/10/22. Diagnoses included difficulty in walking, dysphagia, asthma, multiple sclerosis, cognitive communication deficit,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was timely notified of a change in condition related to a fall and the facility further failed to ensure the family was notified of a resident fall. This affected one (#46) of three residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 44.Findings include:Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/19/25 and a discharge date of 01/06/26. Diagnoses included unspecified intracapsular fracture of left femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), protein calorie malnutrition, Alzheimer's disease, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage three, and anemia.Review of Resident #46's Medicare - five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 had severely impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three. Furthermore, Resident #46 required supervision or touching assistance for chair to bed transfers, bed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food that was opened was properly stored and stored. This had the potential to affect all residents as the facility verified all residents received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 44. Findings include:Observation on 04/13/26 at 8:03 A.M. of walk-in freezer #1 revealed cheese pizzas, a bag of pizza dough, a bag potato wedges, dinner rolls, brown bread, and a bag of diced onions were open and undated.Interview on 04/13/26 at 8:06 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #97 verified the cheese pizzas, a bag of pizza dough, a bag potato wedges, dinner rolls, brown bread, and a bag of diced onions were open and undated. DM #97 verified any time food is opened, the food item should be marked with an open date.Review of the facility policy with a revision date of May 2013 titled Food Storage Policy and Procedure revealed the purpose of the policy was to assure all food is stored, labeled, and dated properly to ensure stock rotation and prevent foodborne illnesses. Furthermore, prepared food is to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of pressure ulcers. This affected one (#21) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 05/26/25 with diagnoses of paraplegia, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, and depression. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #21 revealed he was cognitively intact and was admitted with wounds. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had an unstageable pressure ulcer to the sacrum (tailbone area) that measured 8.5 centimeters (cm) by 4.5 cm by 1.4 cm. Review of the current care plan revealed Resident #21 was care planned for wounds with an intervention in place for a wound vacuum (vac) as ordered. Review of the weekly skin assessments, dated 06/03/25 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered per physician orders. This affected one resident (#147) of one resident reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #147 revealed an admission date of 05/09/25 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), malignant tumor of the bronchus and lung, anxiety, and dependence on oxygen. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/10/25, revealed Resident #147 had mild cognitive impairment and required the use of oxygen therapy. Review of the current physician orders revealed Resident #147 was ordered humidified oxygen at a rate of four liters per minute (LPM) to maintain oxygen saturation (measurement of how much oxygen is in the body) at 90% or above. Review of the care plan, initiated May 2025, revealed Resident #147 received oxygen therapy due to ineffective gas exchange and pulmonary hypertension. Interventions included to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, review of the Cubex (computerized medication dispensing machine, provided and maintained by the contracted pharmacy, for frequently used medications to be available for immediate use) inventory sheet, facility policy review and interviews with staff, pharmacy and family, the facility failed to implement a timely, effective and adequate pain management plan for Resident #143 following the resident's admission to the facility. This affected one (#143) of one resident reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #143 revealed an admission date of 06/05/25 at 1:10 P.M. and a discharge date of 06/05/25 at 10:20 P.M. Resident #143 had diagnoses including low back pain, chronic pain syndrome, intervertebral disc degeneration-thoracic region, lumbosacral intervertebral disc degeneration, radiculopathy-lumbar region, spinal stenosis-lumbosacral region, spinal stenosis-lumbar…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, pharmacy staff interview, medical record review, closed medical record review, and review of the Cubex (computerized medication dispensing machine containing frequently used medications for immediate access for new admissions and/or new physician orders) machine inventory sheets, the facility failed to ensure medication doses were verified prior to administration and further failed to ensure available medications were administered per physician order. This affected two residents (#28 and #143) reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 45. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 11/01/24 with a diagnosis of depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had mild cognitive impairment. Review of the current physician orders revealed Resident #28 was prescribed Wellbutrin XL (medication used to treat depression) oral tablet extended release…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff donned gloves prior to the administration of subcutaneous (injection of medication into the fatty tissue layer beneath the skin) medications. This affected one (#28) of one resident observed for subcutaneous medication administration. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 11/01/24 with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 revealed she had mild cognitive impairment. Review of the current physician orders revealed Resident #28 was prescribed liraglutide (non-insulin treatment for Type II diabetes) 18 milligrams (mg)/three milliliters (ml), inject 1.2 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously in the morning. Observation on 06/17/25 at 7:23 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #637 prepared liraglutide for administration to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to assess a newly identified bruise and further failed to ensure neurological assessments were completed following a head injury. This affected one (#11) of three residents reviewed for injuries. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 03/31/23 with diagnoses of dementia, anxiety, and osteoporosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/10/25, revealed Resident #11 had impaired cognition. Review of the hospital discharge records, dated 02/05/25, revealed Resident #11 was assessed at the hospital after a fall on 02/05/25. The documents revealed a head computed tomography (CT) scan showed a small focus of isodense extra-axial fluid on the right side that was probably a small, subacute subdural hematoma (a collection of blood between the brain and the skull). The plan included follow up in about six weeks with a new head CT. Further review revealed Resident #11 was at risk for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of electronic mail (e-mail) correspondence and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent a fall for one (#13) of three residents reviewed for falls. Additionally, the facility failed to complete neurological checks following an unwitnessed fall with injury and further failed to monitor injuries resulting from a fall per physician order. This affected one (#12) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 11/23/16 with diagnoses of dementia and epilepsy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/28/25, revealed Resident #13 was rarely/never understood, was dependent for transfers and used a wheelchair for mobility. Review of a Fall Risk Screening, dated 09/30/24, revealed Resident #13 was at risk for falls. Review of a nursing progress note dated 12/16/24 revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility incident report, the facility failed to ensure fall incidents were documented in the resident medical record. This affected one (#12) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 11/22/24 with diagnoses of dementia, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/13/25, revealed Resident #12 had impaired condition, was dependent for transfers and used a wheelchair for ambulation. Further review revealed Resident #12 had a fall with a non-major injury since the previous assessment. Review of the progress notes in Resident #12's electronic medical record dated 12/14/24 through 12/16/24 revealed no documentation of a fall. Review of the neurological assessments completed in Resident #12's electronic medical record revealed one was completed on 12/14/25 at 1:35 P.M. and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OTTERBEIN SENIORLIFE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 53 rows in the source record cover these 39 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $371K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH