Otterbein Lebanon Retirement Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 277 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 116 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 141.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place per the resident's plan of care and failed to conduct thorough investigations to determine root cause analysis to identify potential hazards and resident-specific interventions to reduce and/or eliminate falls and falls with injury. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #399 experienced repeated falls resulting in a laceration which required surgical repair. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Resident #26 was provided with adequate supervision and assistance while toileting resulting in an avoidable fall which placed the resident at risk for more than minimal harm that did not result in actual harm to the resident. This affected two (#399 and #26) out of four residents reviewed for falls. The census was 143. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #399 revealed an admission date of 10/07/22 with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and record review, the facility failed to ensure occupied resident rooms were cleaned and maintained in a sanitary condition for two (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) of eight rooms in Magnolia Way. The census was 142.Findings included:1. Review of a document titled, Resident Room Clean Checklist, dated 09/06/25 and signed by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #5, for room [ROOM NUMBER] beds A and B, indicated that dusting furniture, windowsill, etc. and removing cobwebs was not completed.An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 09/09/25 at 4:02 P.M. revealed the windowsill had cobwebs.An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 09/10/25 at 11:14 A.M. revealed brown debris scattered on top of the air conditioning unit and cobwebs in the corners of the windowsill. During an interview on 09/10/25 at 11:16 A.M., CNA #5 stated housekeeping did not come to Magnolia and they completed the cleaning. CNA #5 stated staff were given a cleaning list where they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This affected one (#151) of 37 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The census was 142.Findings included:Review of the medical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #151 on 10/26/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/29/25, revealed Resident #151 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment indicated the resident required substantial to maximum assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) and received supplemental oxygen therapy while a resident. Review of Resident #151's care plan report, initiated on 11/15/23 and last revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were followed for one (#27) of six residents reviewed for infection control. The census was 142. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed the facility admitted Resident #27 on 09/11/19. Diagnoses included unspecified displaced fracture of the second cervical vertebra and sequela and unspecified stage pressure ulcer of sacral region.Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/02/25, revealed Resident #27 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment indicated the resident had Stage Two (partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis) and a Stage Four (full-thickness skin and tissue loss) pressure ulcers and received pressure ulcer/injury care and an application of a nonsurgical dressing (with or without topical medication) other than to feet during the review period.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, interviews, and review of the medication reference the facility failed to discontinue laboratory testing, per physician order, resulting in a resident receiving two anticoagulant medications concurrently. This affected one (Resident #92) of three residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, type II diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease, stage III. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #92 had intact cognition and was always incontinent of bowel and frequently incontinent of bladder. The resident required supervision with eating, moderate assistance with oral hygiene, maximal assistance with bathing, bed mobility and transfers and was dependent for personal hygiene, toileting and dressing. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to prevent a resident from receiving two anticoagulant medications concurrently resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (Resident #92) of three residents reviewed for anticoagulant therapy. The facility identified 30 residents receiving anticoagulant medications. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, type II diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease, stage III. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #92 had intact cognition and was always incontinent of bowel and frequently incontinent of bladder. The resident required supervision with eating, moderate assistance with oral hygiene, maximal assistance with bathing, bed mobility and transfers and was dependent for personal hygiene,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-10-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility menus, observations, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide puree food portions as planned by a Registered Dietitian. This had the potential to eight (#27, #14, #24, #73, #65, #35, #71,and #48) residents who received food from the [NAME] Hall kitchettes. The total facility census was 143. Findings include: Review of Registered Dietitian approved puree meal tickets dated 10/20/22 revealed a puree menu and portions of hotdog and bun eight ounces, (#8 scoop, doubled), corn of four ounces, mashed potatoes four ounces, (#8 scoop) and pudding four ounces. Observation on 10/20/22 at 12:15 P.M. of Magnolia steam table serving utensils revealed the residents received puree hotdog of four ounces, mash potatoes of #12 scoop. Interview on 10/120/22 of State Tested Nurse Aide, (STNA) # 157, who served the puree meal on the Magnolia unit, verified the residents received the incorrect portion of hotdog, (only one four ounce portion) and mashed potatoes. STNA #157…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident preferences regarding bathing were honored. This affected one (#398) of 28 residents sampled. The facility census was 143. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #398 revealed an admission date of 10/02/22 with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the prostate. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #398 dated 10/09/22 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and required physical assistance of one staff with bathing. Review of section F revealed the resident reported it was very important for him to choose between a tub bath, shower, and bed bath. Review of the care plan for Resident #398 dated 10/02/22 revealed resident was able to express preferences regarding his daily life. Interventions included: resident prefers to assist with his own personal care, resident prefers a shower in the morning. Review of bathing sheet for Resident #398 dated 10/04/22…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with appropriate fingernail care. This affected one (#43) of 28 residents sampled. The facility census is 143. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #43 dated 07/14/22 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff with bathing and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan for Resident #43 dated 10/28/20 revealed resident had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care deficit related to cognitive/communication challenges and requires total assistance with, toileting, dressing grooming and eating. Interventions include the following: provide total assistance with dressing and grooming, assist with bathing and showering, check resident's nail length and trim…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-25 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide an adequate and timely response to a resident with suicidal ideation. This affected one (#366) of 28 residents sampled. The facility census was 143. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #396 revealed an admission date of 09/07/22 with a diagnosis of acute pulmonary edema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #396 dated 09/12/22 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of one to two staff with activities of daily living. Review of the nurse progress note for Resident #396 dated 09/08/22 revealed the resident verbalized suicidal ideation to the nurse. Resident #396 said he wanted morphine for his pain so he could die. The nurse noted Resident #396 was to have a psychological consult with the facility's psychologist. Review of the care plan for Resident #396 dated 09/12/22 revealed the resident had suicidal ideation's. Interventions included the following: administer medications as ordered and monitor for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility documents and policy, the facility failed to ensure nurses administered insulin as ordered by the physician resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (#62) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 143. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 08/03/22 with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #62 dated 08/03/22 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of staff with activities of daily living (ADL's.) Review of the care plan for Resident #62 dated 09/01/20 revealed resident had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM.). Interventions included the following: check resident's blood sugar as ordered by the doctor and report as needed, provide diabetes medication as ordered by the doctor, monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Review of the October 2022 monthly physician orders for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OTTERBEIN SENIORLIFE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 50 rows in the source record cover these 36 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $965K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH