No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Heights Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center, The

2801 E Royalton Rd, Broadview Heights, OH 44147 · For profit - Corporation · 149 certified beds · (440) 526-4770 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Nov 2025Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$183,316 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Nov 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $183,316 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
5901 E Royalton Rd Ste 2300 · (440) 887-9140 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Pharmacy0.1 mi
4343 Royalton Road
Grocery
4343 Royalton Road
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
155 Ken Mar Industrial Pkwy · (216) 227-1260

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.1%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms95.4%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.2%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%6.1%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication49.9%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.7%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.5%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%75.6%79.4%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.6%CMS range 37.9–65.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 6.9–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.1–13.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.83
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.85
RN hoursweekends
67.3%
Total nursing turnover
81.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 149 beds and averages 107.7 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-09-14)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2020-01-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-06-09 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed medical record review, review of emergency medical services (EMS) run report, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely provide basic life support (BLS) including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to Resident #123 (a resident with advance directives for a Full Code status). This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm with subsequent death on [DATE] at approximately 4:20 A.M. when Resident #123 was found not breathing, not moving, unresponsive, and without vital signs. Prior to initiating CPR, Registered Nurse (RN) #439 requested assistance from RN #301. The two nurses attempted to notify the on call Nurse Practitioner (NP) who did not answer and then notified Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #419 that the resident was unresponsive and absent of vital signs. ADON #419 instructed them to begin CPR as the resident was a Full Code. CPR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of video/audio camera recordings, review of a fire department cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) report, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of the facility policy for call lights, review of the facility policy for resident condition change, review of the redcross.org Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Steps reference, and interviews, the facility failed to timely and appropriately respond to Resident #118's calls for assistance and failed to provide adequate assistance/intervention as the resident was experiencing a change in condition/respiratory distress. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm/subsequently death beginning on [DATE] at 6:59 A.M. when staff failed to provide timely and appropriate care after Resident #118 pushed her call light and began yelling out for the nurse. Video/audio recording of the resident on [DATE] between 7:13 A.M. and 10:30 A.M. demonstrated a continued lack of adequate and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure wound care orders were updated and treatments had been administered per physician orders for three residents. This affected two residents (#73 and #105) of three reviewed for wound care and one resident (#35) out of three residents reviewed for tube feeding. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure timely and appropriate incontinence care had been completed. This affected one resident (#12) of three observed for incontinence care. The facility also failed to ensure appropriate and timely care provided for a change in condition for one resident (#120) of six residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 107.Findings Include: 1. Record review for Resident #105 revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: cerebral infraction, pyogenic arthritis, type two diabetes, insomnia, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, end stage renal disease, carpal tunnel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-09 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to serve meals to meet the nutritional needs of residents requiring double portions at meals. This affected all 24 residents (#1, #5, #7, #8, #14, #18, #28, #37, #38, #46, #47, #50, #56, #63, #69, #74, #84, #89, #90, #94, #95, #106, #108, and #119) identified by the facility as requiring double portions at lunch meals. The facility census was 107. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 03/04/26 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, anemia in chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and anxiety. Review of the dietary assessment note dated 05/06/26 at 4:27 P.M. revealed Resident #1 received a regular diet with regular texture and double entree portions. Review of the nutritional care plan, revised 05/14/26, revealed Resident #1 was at risk for altered nutritional status related to diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anxiety, depression, gastroesophageal reflux disease, anemia, altered nutrition related labs, history of significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to accurately document the care for facility residents. This affected five residents (Residents #4, #87, #113, #120, and #121) of nine closed records reviewed and 34 open records reviewed. The facility census was 107. Findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis after a stroke affecting the right dominant side, diabetes, a gastrostomy (a surgical incision to the stomach used to provide nutrition to the resident), atrial fibrillation, diabetes, high blood pressure, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and convulsions. The resident was transferred to the emergency room (ER) on [DATE] and did not return. Review of the quarterly comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4 was rarely/never understood, was dependent on staff for all care, and has a feeding tube. Review of the nursing progress notes revealed on [DATE] at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident bathing facilities in proper functioning order. This had the potential to affect all 107 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 05/17/26 at 3:20 P.M., an observation of the shower room by room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a sign on the door indicating the shower room was closed until further notice and there was no date on the sign. On 05/17/26 at 3:20 P.M., an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #388 confirmed that shower room was out of order and had been for as long as she had been working at the facility, which she stated was about one year. On 05/20/26 at 11:10 A.M., an observation of the shower room by room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a walk-in tub in the middle of the shower room. An interview at the time of observation with Regional Maintenance Director #503 stated it needed repairs and they were not going to fix it because the census was low. On 05/20/26 at 12:13 P.M., an interview with Director of Nursing (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff called report and sent associated laboratory reports to the emergency room (ER) when a resident sustained a change in condition and was transferred to the ER. This affected one resident (Resident #120) of six residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Resident #120 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels in the blood), diabetes, chronic kidney disease, high blood pressure, vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, prostate cancer, a cerebral aneurysm, a gastrostomy (a surgically placed tube placed into the stomach to allow feeding through a tube), and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The resident was transferred to the ER on [DATE] and did not return to the facility.Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #120's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and a review of facility policies, the facility failed to provide required activities of daily living (ADL) care by not removing facial hair for one resident (Resident #29) and by not ensuring showers were provided for another resident (Resident #20). This deficiency affected two residents (Residents #20 and #29) who were dependent on staff for care, out of four residents reviewed for ADL services. The facility census was 107.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 04/08/24 with diagnoses including encephalopathy, spastic hemiplegia, type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, schizoaffective disorder, legal blindness, obstructive sleep apnea, cerebral palsy, essential hypertension, diastolic heart failure, mild intellectual disabilities, and anemia. Review of Resident's #29 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments for a pressure ulcer were administered per physician orders. This affected one resident (#100) of five reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 107. Findings Include:Record review for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 12/18/18 with diagnosis that included Alzheimer's disease, type two diabetes, repeated falls, dementia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, disorientation, delusional disorder, essential hypertension and hypothyroidism.Review of the Skin Inspection assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 did not have any new skin issues. Review of the Wound Evaluation assessment authored by ADON #375 and dated 05/16/26 revealed the resident had a new pressure deep tissue injury (DTI) wound on her left heel that was 5.5 centimeters (cm) in length and 6 cm in width. Review of Resident #100's wound care note dated 05/20/26 authored by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #24 and Resident #121 was free from significant medication error. This affected two residents (#24 and #121) of three reviewed for medications as physician ordered. The facility census was 107. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #24's medical records revealed an admission date of 07/08/21. Diagnoses included high blood pressure and multiple sclerosis. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 had impaired cognition. Resident #24 was dependent with toileting, bathing and personal hygiene and incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of care plan dated 04/24/26 revealed Resident #24 had impaired cardiovascular status related to hypertension (high blood pressure). Interventions included medications per physicians orders, monitor and report to physician signs/symptoms of hypertension that include headache, lethargy or confusion and monitor vital signs as needed. Review of change in condition progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the bedside. This affected one Resident (#1), of three observed for unattended medications. The facility census was 107. Findings include:Review of Resident #1's medical records revealed an admission date of 03/04/26. Diagnoses included diabetes, chronic pain, depression, anxiety and hypertension (high blood pressure).Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed no cognition score due to Resident #1 was rarely understood. Resident #1 was dependent with toileting, bathing and personal hygiene and was non-ambulatory.Observation on 05/17/26 at 8:24 A.M. revealed a medication cup on Resident #1's bedside that contained two white tablets and one capsule. Resident #1 was sleeping during observation.Interview on 05/17/26 at 8:31 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #369 confirmed the medication cup in Resident #1's room however she was unable to identify the medications inside the cup.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy the facility failed to ensure labs were completed as ordered. This affected one resident (Resident #29) of five residents reviewed for lab services. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of Resident #29 medical record revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: encephalopathy, spastic hemiplegia, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, schizoaffective disorder, legal blindness, obstructive sleep apnea, cerebral palsy, essential hypertension, diastolic heart failure, mild intellectual disabilities and anemia. Review of Resident #29's physician orders revealed the resident had an order dated 12/18/24 for HgA1C labs every 3 months (December, March, June, September). There was no evidence of Resident #29's HgA1C for March 2026.Interview on 05/19/26 at 3:30 P.M. with Resident #29 during the Resident Council meeting revealed the resident was ordered labs quarterly to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, review of facility policy, and review of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for transmission-based precautions, the facility failed to follow infection control standards during wound care, which affected one resident (#9) out of five reviewed for pressure ulcers. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care to residents on contact isolation, which affected one resident (#81) out of four identified by the facility as having orders for contact isolation. The facility census was 107. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 10/06/25 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, systemic lupus, aphasia, locked-in syndrome, gastrostomy status, and extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance. Review of the physician's orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy for influenza vaccine, the facility failed to administer the influenza vaccine to Resident #3 after consent was given. This affected one resident (#3) out of five reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 107. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 12/29/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, anxiety, and tracheostomy status. Review of Resident #3's Vaccine Informed Consent Form (CRNF) - V 3, dated 12/31/25, revealed Resident #3 consented to receive the influenza vaccine. Review of the immunizations section of Resident #3's electronic medical record revealed No data available. On 06/02/26 at 1:06 P.M., an interview with Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #3 consented to receive the influenza vaccine on 12/31/25. DON said vaccines were documented in the immunizations section of the electronic medical record and verified Resident #3's immunization section indicated there was no data available. On 06/02/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, Self-Reported Incident review, review of witness statements, review of police incident report, review of Resident Funds Management Service statement landscape and withdrawal record, review of cashed checks, review of emails, personnel record review, disciplinary action review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to protect residents right to be free from misappropriation of resident property and/or exploitation. This affected 13 residents (#6, #8, #9, #12, #32, #43, #57, #67, #83, #87, #97, #105, and #107) of 66 residents who had a resident funds account during January 2025 and September 2025. The census was 102.Findings Include:Review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI) dated 09/02/25 revealed an allegation of misappropriation when staff notified the Administrator of suspected misappropriation of resident funds. On 09/02/25, it was identified Business Office Manager (BOM) #120 allegedly purchased items for Resident #97 that were not authorized by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, nursing staff schedule review, disciplinary action review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to implement a person-center care plan to support the behavioral health care needs of Resident #1. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for behavioral health. The census was 102.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 04/22/25 with diagnoses which included borderline personality disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, severe morbid obesity due to excess calories, arthritis, pain in left hip and fibromyalgia. Review of the potential for pain care plan revised on 04/26/25 revealed Resident #1 had potential for pain related to fibromyalgia, neuropathy, osteoarthritis and left hip pain with interventions which included: administer medications per physician orders, notify physician or nurse practitioner if current pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an individualized care plan was developed for Resident #1 to address the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to identify triggers and interventions to minimize risk of re-traumatization. This affected one resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility identified one resident (Resident #1) as having PTSD. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 04/22/25. Diagnoses included generalized anxiety, borderline personality disorder, major depressive disorder, and PTSD. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/29/25, revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact, exhibited other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others four to six days of the assessment reference period, was independent for transfers and was able to independently maneuver her motorized wheelchair 50 and 150 feet. Walking hadn ' t been attempted during the assessment reference period. Review of PTSD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure visibly soiled bedding was changed in a timely manner affecting Resident #76. The facility also failed to ensure the south wing shower room wall was maintained in good repair. This had the potential to affect 35 residents (#5, #9, #21, #24, #27, #30, #31, #37, #38, #41, #44, #48, #49, #52, #56, #65, #66, #68, 69, #71, #72, #74, #82, #84, #92, #95, #97, #99, #100, #101, #102, #104, #108, 109, and #114) of 38 residents that use the south wing shower room. The facility census was 115. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed an initial admission date of 12/03/24. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, tracheostomy status, dependence on respirator (ventilator), gastrostomy (feeding tube). Review of the comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #76 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation on 06/24/25 at 11:32…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comfortable room temperatures for Resident #20 and Resident #113. This finding affected two residents (Residents #20 and #113) of 115 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #113's medical's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and tracheostomy status. Review of Resident #113's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited a memory problem. Review of Resident #113's medical record revealed the resident's temperature on 06/20/25 at 11:36 A.M. was 98.0 degrees Fahrenheit; on 06/21/25 at 9:16 A.M. was 98.4 degrees Fahrenheit; on 06/22/25 at 9:25 A.M. was 98.9 degrees Fahrenheit; on 06/23/25 at 9:10 P.M. was 97.7 degrees Fahrenheit; and on 06/24/25 at 5:14 A.M. was 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of Resident #113's medical record revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #200's scattered bruises were comprehensively assessed and monitored to include descriptions, measurements, and progression. This finding affected one resident (#200) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of Resident #200's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged against medical advice (AMA) on 08/10/24 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, muscle weakness, and aphasia. Review of Resident #200's admission Evaluation dated 08/02/24 revealed the resident was alert to person, had aphasia, and was sometimes difficult to communicate his needs. The resident did not have skin impairments. Review of Resident #200's Wound Evaluation form dated 08/03/24 revealed the resident had redness and irritation on his buttocks. No other skin conditions were documented. Review of Resident #200's Fall Occurrence Evaluation form dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure resident records were protected and only accessed by authorized individuals. This affected one resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for safe record keeping. The facility census was 125. Findings include: Record review of Resident #3 revealed she was admitted to the facility 11/29/23 and had diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the lung, cognitive communication deficit, and sheltered homelessness. Review of her minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had severe cognitive impairment. Her contact list identified POA #601 and #602 as her powers of attorney and Interview with Power of Attorney (POA) #601 on 04/02/24 at 1:43 P.M. revealed she was a POA for Resident #3 and only her and POA #602 were the only non-providers allowed to access Resident #3's medical information. The resident had a sister (Family Member #603) who was not allowed to access the records due to the resident's wishes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure alleged abuse events were reported and investigated appropriately. This affected one resident (#19) of five residents reviewed for abuse prohibition. The facility census was 125. Findings include: Record review of Resident #19 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hemiplegia, cognitive communication deficit, and anxiety disorder. She was assessed by her minimum data set assessment on 02/28/24 as having severe cognitive impairment. A progress note dated 02/06/24 entered by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #701 revealed Resident #19 called the police and said staff beat her and treated her harshly. The police left the facility after stating they had no concerns regarding resident safety. There was no documentation of any related skin assessment, notification to management, or investigation into the allegation. Interview with Resident #19 on 04/02/24 at 10:06 A.M. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on closed medical record review, video/audio footage review, review of a facility self-reported incident, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of neglect were timely reported to the State agency. This affected one resident (#118) of two residents reviewed for death. The census was 112. Findings include: Review of Resident #118's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 06/08/23 and a discharge date of 09/17/23. Resident #118 had diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), muscle weakness, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, chronic congestive heart failure, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. Record review of the care plan for Resident #118 dated 06/08/23 revealed the resident's advance directives were for a full code status. Record review revealed the resident also had a care plan for impaired respiratory status related to asthma, sleep apnea, and chronic respiratory failure. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, assist with activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of the audio/video footage, interview and policy review, the facility failed to accurately document Resident #118's condition change and care provided in the resident's medical record. This affected one resident (#118) of two residents reviewed for death. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of Resident #118's closed medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE]. Resident #118 had diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), muscle weakness, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, chronic congestive heart failure, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of Resident #118's physician orders revealed an order dated [DATE] indicating Resident #118 was to have nothing by mouth (NPO). An order dated [DATE] indicated Resident #118 was a full code. Review of a nurse's note, dated [DATE] timed 12:00 P.M. and completed by LPN #221 revealed during morning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported to the state agency as required. This affected one resident (#9) of three residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Record review for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 08/17/22. Diagnoses included personal history of traumatic brain injury, anxiety disorder, dementia unspecified severity with mood disturbance, and muscle weakness. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #9 revealed Resident #9 was rarely or never understood. Resident #9 required extensive assistants of one for bed mobility, transfers, dressings, eating, and personal hygiene. Resident #9 used a wheelchair for mobility. Resident #9 had no behavior towards others such as hitting, kicking, pushing, etc., and had no rejection of care. Record review of the care plan for Resident #9 dated 08/14/23 revealed Resident #9…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure consistent safe storage of smoking materials. This affected two residents (Resident #4 and #52) of two residents reviewed for smoking with the potential to affect all 16 Residents who are independent smokers (Residents #4, #12, #31, #35, #52, #82, #89, #90, #96, #99, #104, #112, #116, #118, #141 and #277). The facility census was 116. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 01/30/20 and a readmission date of 09/18/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, interstitial pulmonary disease, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 had intact cognition. Resident #52 required extensive two-person physical assistance for mobility; total dependence of two-persons for transfer, locomotion on and off the unit,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared to the appropriate consistency. This affected eight residents (Residents #11, #29, #55, #58, #59, #60, #84 and #105) receiving a pureed diet. The facility census was 116 residents. Findings include: Review of the diet spreadsheet for week three, day 17 corresponding to 09/12/23 revealed a meal consisting of pork tips in gravy, steamed rice, broccoli, dinner roll and melon cubes. Beef tips were substituted for the pork tips at the lunch meal. Observation on 09/12/23 starting at 12:00 P.M. with [NAME] #328 revealed a pan of beef tips were ready to be pureed. [NAME] #328 indicated she needed nine portions and used a #8-scoop and placed five scoops into the food processor. The food was blended and tasted by [NAME] #328, Dietary Manager (DM) #325 and the surveyor at 12:05 P.M. and the mixture was not smooth with pieces of meat still palpable on the tongue. [NAME] #328 continued to blend and taste the mixture at 12:15 P.M., 12:22 P.M. and 12:29 P.M., adding five ounces of beef broth to the mixture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, maintenance log review, and staff interview the facility failed to maintain resident rooms in a safe and functional condition. This affected four residents (Resident #11, #23, #42, #55) of 116 residents observed for environment. Findings include: A tour of the facility was conducted on 09/11/19 from 9:10 A.M. to 4:36 P.M. and the following environmental conditions were identified: 1. The room walls next to Resident #11, #23, and #55 had damage from peeled paint with dry wall showing. 2. The back wall was filled with white spackles on top of colored paint. Resident #42 stated it has been like that for three months. 3. Resident #55 room had a cracked electrical outlet plate with wires exposed on the wall next to resident bed while resident #55 was in bed. Review of the facility maintenance log revealed the above environmental concerns were not in the log. Interview of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #389 on 09/11/23 at 10:24 A.M. confirmed the electric outlet plate was cracked next to resident #55's bed and stated I don't think it is safe, I will have maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide spend-down letters for each month the resident was over the resource limit. This affected three residents (Residents #9, #13 and #93) of five residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 116 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/02/22 and diagnoses including end stage renal disease, type two diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, anxiety and anemia. Review of nurses' notes from 04/25/23 to 09/12/23 revealed no notes indicating the need to spend-down funds. Review of Resident #9's quarterly resident funds statement revealed balances of $3564.92 on 04/01/23, balances of $5363.79 on 05/01/23, and $7161.82 on 06/01/23. Review of supporting resident funds documentation revealed a spend-down letter was issued on 07/18/23. Interview on 09/13/23 at 11:24 A.M. with Senior Business Office Manager (SBOM) #360 and the Administrator revealed the facility provided quarterly-spend down letters and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were consistent across electronic and paper medical records. This affected two residents (Resident #23 and Resident #105) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 116 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/18/22 with diagnoses including senile degeneration of brain, dysphagia, muscle weakness, falls, hypertension and chronic kidney disease stage three. Review of Resident #23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had a memory problem and received hospice care. Review of Resident #23's paper chart revealed no advanced directive information was available. Review of Resident #23's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a code status of Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNR-CC) on the gray bar below Resident #23's photo. Review of a physician's order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care to Resident #22. This affected one resident (Resident #22) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 12/24/21. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, type two diabetes mellitus, and polyneuropathy. Review of the facility care plan for Resident #22 dated 08/08/23 revealed she had episodes of bowel and bladder incontinence related to depression, diabetes, and obesity. Interventions included to assist her with toileting needs and to provide peri care after each incontinent episode. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #22 revealed she had intact cognition. Resident #22 required extensive two-person assistance for bed mobility; total dependence of two persons for transfers; extensive assistance of one person for dressing, toilet use, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide catheter care in a manner to prevent infection. This affected one (Resident #44) of two residents reviewed for catheters. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 03/08/23. Diagnoses included non-displaced fracture of the right tibial tuberosity, hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the physician's order dated 01/05/23 for Resident #44 revealed orders to clean his suprapubic catheter with soap and water, pat dry, and cover with gauze every shift. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #44 revealed he had intact cognition. Resident #44 required extensive two-person physical assistance for bed mobility and toilet use; total dependence of two-persons for transfers; extensive one-person physical assistance for dressing and personal hygiene; and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide nutritional juice supplement to Resident #79 that was ordered due to a significant weight loss. This affected one resident (Resident #79) of eight residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 08/06/21. Diagnoses included hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, and major depressive disorder. Review of physician's order dated 08/06/21 for Resident #79 revealed an order for a regular diet with regular texture and thin consistency. Resident #79 was also to receive double potions. Review of Resident #79's recorded weights dated 02/07/23 revealed he weighed 165 pounds. Resident #79 weighed 152 pounds on 06/05/23 and 146 pounds on 09/03/23. Review of dietary note dated 07/07/23 for Resident #79 revealed during the annual nutritional assessment he had a history of weight loss and fluctuations. Resident #79 was ordered to receive orange nutritional drink three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen and nursing unit refrigerators, as well as ensure hair restraints were worn in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all but three residents (Residents #14, #74 and #88) who received nothing by mouth. Findings include: Brief initial tour of the kitchen on 01/27/20 at 8:15 A.M. with Registered Dietitian (RD) #85 revealed staff in the kitchen serving breakfast. A contracted staff was observed without any form of hair restraints repairing the juice machine. The walk-in freezer revealed a box of frozen pie crust that was wide open with the frozen pie crust exposed. In the walk-in cooler there was a stack of cheese wrapped in saran wrap that wasn't labeled or dated. All findings were verified by RD #85. Second tour of the kitchen on 01/28/20 at 8:50 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #147 revealed the bottom portion of the stove had grease stains and various food crumbs. The wall and floor behind and adjacent to the stove had various grime and food stains.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-30 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pureed chicken was prepared according the recipe. This had the potential to affect seven residents (Residents #3, #10, #47, #75, #79, #93 and #305) who received pureed diets. Findings include: Observation on 01/29/20 at 9:32 A.M. of the preparation of the pureed baked rosemary chicken revealed Dietary Staff (DS) #100 added cooked rosemary chicken breast with rosemary seeds on top into the blender. DS #100 then added thickener and chicken broth and then started blender. DS #100 stopped the blender and added more thickener, blended it again, and stopped the blender. DS #100 stated the baked rosemary chicken was done. The pureed rosemary chicken appeared smooth with specks in it. During the taste test a whole rosemary seed was observed. At this time DS #100 verified there were whole rosemary seeds in the pureed meat. Interview on 01/29/20 at approximately 9:40 A.M. with DS #100 revealed she did not have the recipe for the ground baked rosemary chicken. Interview on 01/29/20 at 9:41 A.M. with DS #151…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-30 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate portion sizes were served for the mechanical soft chicken. This had the potential to affect 29 residents (Residents #2, #4, #7, #8, #11, #15, #20, #24, #25, #28, #29, #31, #36, #38, #50, #58, #59, #63, #69, #70, #73, #81, #86, #89, #96, #100, #101, #105 and #156) who received a mechanical soft diet. Findings include: Observation on 01/29/20 at 11:33 A.M. of the tray line meal service revealed Dietary Staff (DS) #100 plate a mechanical soft diet using a black handled scoop for the ground baked rosemary chicken. Interview at this time with DS #100 revealed the black handled scoop used to serve the ground baked rosemary chicken was three ounces. Registered Dietitian (RD) #85 picked up the black handled scoop from the ground chicken and verified it was a three-ounce serving. RD #85 stated it should be four ounce serving scoop. Review of the Diet Spreadsheet revealed the serving for the soft baked rosemary chicken was four ounces.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible for Residents #46 and #51. This affected two Residents (#46 and #51) of 32 residents reviewed for call light placement. The facility census was 104. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, anxiety disorder and diabetes mellitus. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of one person for activities of daily living. Review of Resident #46's care plan dated 05/18/19 revealed the call light should be within reach. Observation of Resident #46 on 01/27/20 at 10:01 A.M. revealed Resident #46 was lying in bed with her eyes open. The call light was noted to be on the floor behind the headboard of the bed and out of reach of Resident #46.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure code status matched in both the electronic medical record and the hard chart. This affect one Resident (#88) of 34 residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: Record review of Resident #88 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and tracheostomy. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an intact cognition. Review of the [DATE] physician's orders for Resident #88 revealed Full Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) dated [DATE]. Review of Resident #88's hard chart located at the nursing station revealed under the Advanced Directives tab Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) form signed but undated by Resident #88's Power of Attorney (POA) and the Nurse Practitioner (NP). Interview on [DATE] at 5:20 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 verified the code statuses in the electronic medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Residents #39 and #94's toilets were cleaned and Resident #88's respiratory suction machine and stand were cleaned. This affected three residents (Residents #39, #94 and #88) but had the potential to affect all 104 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 01/27/20 at 9:48 A.M. of Resident #94's bathroom revealed there was dried bowel movement on the toilet seat and bathroom floor. This was verified by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #109 at the time of the observation. 2. Observation on 01/27/20 at 10:09 A.M. of Resident #39's toilet seat revealed it was dirty with brown specks on it. This was verified by LPN #41 at the time of the observation. Interview on 01/30/20 at 10:25 A.M. with Director of Environmental Services #9 revealed rooms are cleaned daily, and she does rounds frequently. Review of the Housekeeping policies, dated 08/2014, revealed that resident rooms should be maintained in a clean, safe and sanitary. 3. Observation on 01/27/20 at 10:12 A.M. of Resident #88's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-11-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement specific policies and procedures for maintaining oxygen concentrators. The facility failed to ensure oxygen filters were in place for Resident #10 and failed to ensure filters were clean for 10 residents (Residents #3, #21, #28, #40, #42, #48, #50, #66, #80 and #92). This affected 11 residents of 19 residents observed with oxygen concentrators. Findings include: During an interview with Resident #28 on 11/05/18 at 11:44 A.M. the resident was observed to be using oxygen from a concentrator set at four liters. The filter (which filters air being pulled into the concentrator for the person to breath) on the oxygen concentrator was observed covered with a layer of thick gray dust. The oxygen concentrator for her roommate, Resident #50, was observed and the filter was observed with a layer of thick gray dust. An environmental tour was conducted on 11/08/18 beginning at 9:36 A.M. with the Administrator, Housekeeping/Laundry Director #301 and Environmental Director #302. They observed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-08 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide or obtain routine dental services to meet the needs of the Resident #38. This affected one (Resident #38) of two residents reviewed for dental services. Finding include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed admission dated of 06/06/16. Diagnosis included end stage renal (kidney) disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the annually minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was alert and oriented with intact cognition and had no concerns with dentures or teeth. Observation on 11/06/18 at 9:53 A.M. of Resident #38 during interview revealed Resident #38 had one upper tooth and three bottom teeth. Resident #38 stated he had requested dentures and the facility had not done anything yet. Resident #38 stated he goes to dialysis three days a week and that is when the dentist is scheduled at the facility. Interview on 11/06/18 at 1:54 P.M. with Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #300 verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer to the resident and/or representative(s) upon hospital transfer/discharge. This affected three residents (Residents #2, #57 and #123) of four residents reviewed for discharges/transfers with hospitalizations. The facility census was 116. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Schizoaffective disorder, chronic pancreatitis, anxiety disorder, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Continued review of Resident #57's medical record revealed the resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], and then discharged back to the hospital on [DATE] and returned on 09/09/23. There was no documentation in the medical record Resident #57 and/or her power of attorney (POA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide written notice of bed hold duration to the resident and/or representative(s) at the time of discharge/transfer to the hospital. This affected three residents (Residents #57, #2 and #123) of four residents reviewed for discharges with hospitalizations. The facility census was 116. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Schizoaffective disorder, chronic pancreatitis, anxiety disorder, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Continued review of Resident #57's medical record revealed the resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], and then discharged back to the hospital on [DATE] and returned on 09/09/23. There was no evidence in the medical record Resident #57 and/or her power of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify and provide written notice to the residents and/ or their responsible parties of the residents transfer to the hospital and failed to ensure the ombudsman was aware of the residents transfer out of the facility. This affected three residents (Residents #26, #83 and #107) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 104. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #26 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, major depressive disorder, chronic pain syndrome and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of Resident #26's progress notes revealed on 12/15/19 the resident was sent to the hospital via emergency medical services per physician order for abnormal vital signs. Review of the monthly discharge paperwork sent to the ombudsman revealed the list of discharges did not include Resident #26. Interview with Social Worker (SW) #50 on 01/29/20 at 1:16 P.M. verified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify and provide written notice to the residents and/ or their responsible parties of the facility's bed-hold policy. This affected three residents (Residents #26, #83 and #107) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 104. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #26 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to multiple sclerosis, major depressive disorder, chronic pain syndrome and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of Resident #26's progress notes revealed on 12/15/19 the resident was sent to the hospital via emergency medical services per physician order for abnormal vital signs. There was no documented evidence in the medical record the resident and/ or the responsible party were given written notice of the facility's bed-hold for the resident. 2. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including mild protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$183,316 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $183,316 — penalty dated 2023-09-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CROWN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CROWN OHIO HOLDCO II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/01/2019
DAUBENMIRE, KEVINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025
ELKINS WAY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/31/2022
FLANAGAN, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/14/2024
MANDAT, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/04/2019
FEJCC TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025
MDATAS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025
MRS FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025
WEINTRAUB, MOSHEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$766K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 3%Other / private 14%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $766K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$322per resident / day
operating cost
$9,785per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$314per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365661. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-09-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next