No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Troy Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

512 Crescent Drive, Troy, OH 45373 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 155 certified beds · (937) 335-7161 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 335-7161 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 20261 actual-harm citation$35,968 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $35,968 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-16)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
998 S Dorset Rd · (937) 332-8843 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Kroger0.4 mi
731 W Market St · (937) 573-4530 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
810 S Market St · (937) 335-8368 · Call to confirm hours
Park
McKaig Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.4%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.4%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms53.2%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.2%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.9%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine40.7%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.7%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.3%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine19.3%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.5%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.0%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.141.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.191.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
44.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.08U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 44.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.5%CMS range 35.3–59.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.3–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge44.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge26.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 4.4–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
1.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.50
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.05
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
48.3%
Total nursing turnover
58.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 155 beds and averages 134.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.50 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-07)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-12-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff, Nurse Practitioner (NP) #447, Physician #448 and Neurologist #449 interviews, review of medication information from Medscape, and policy review, the facility failed to appropriately reconcile medications following a hospital re-admission resulting in a significant medication error. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #96 was re-admitted from the hospital on [DATE] and the facility failed to appropriately reconcile the resident's transfer orders resulting in the resident's anticonvulsant medication being abruptly stopped on 11/06/24 and Resident #96 subsequently began having seizure activity on 11/11/24 which resulted in re-hospitalization. This affected one (#96) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 131. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #96 revealed an original admission date of 01/09/23. Diagnoses include metabolic encephalopathy, epilepsy without status epilepticus, transient ischemic attack and cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored. This affected one resident, (#14) of three reviewed. The facility census was 136. Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #14 revealed admission date of 06/01/12. The resident's medical diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), schizoaffective disorder depressive type, and unspecified pain.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. She required set up assistance with eating, required touching assistance with toileting hygiene, bed mobility and transfers.Record review of the physician orders revealed an order to apply green pain relieving gel to left hip every four hours as needed with a start date of 04/20/26.Observation on 06/02/26 at 3:39 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #101 in the room of Resident #14 revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of medical records, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents smoked only in the designated smoking areas and failed to ensure the safety of a vulnerable resident while on leave of absence (LOA). This affected four (#16, #73, #108, and #131) of twenty-eight residents reviewed for smoking and one (#50) of six residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 133.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/26/25. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, left below the knee amputation, and peripheral vascular disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had intact cognition and a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Review of the physician orders dated 09/26/25 revealed an order that the resident may go LOA with supervision. Review of application for guardianship Statement of Expert Evaluation (SOEE) documentation dated 12/31/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for residents. This affected #1, #29, and #91 and had the potential to affect the 48 residents who utilized the B-hall shower rooms. The facility census was 133.Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/06/25 at 8:21 A.M. of the B-hall shower rooms, left and right shower rooms, revealed in the right shower room, it was observed to have large brown/black spots on the floor around the toilet and into the shower area which appeared to have a wheel pattern streak on the floor. The shower stall had missing tiles near the floor and a hole approximately 12 inches by 12 inches, six inches above the floor in one of the corners of the stall. The grout on the floors and walls of the shower room had dark colored brown and black spots in some areas of the tilework. Interview on 04/06/26 at 8:22 A.M. with Unit Manager (UM) #439 verified the condition of the right shower room. UM #439 verified there was black/brown debris on the floor which appeared to be smears from a wheelchair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were clean and homelike environment. This affected two (#31 and #64) of six residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 133.Findings include:Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/15/25. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy and epilepsy. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL).Review of Resident #64 medical record revealed an admission date of 07/25/23. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder and Alzheimer's disease.Observation on 03/30/26 at 8:27 A.M. revealed an used incontinence brief on the floor between Resident #31 and Resident #64's beds. The brief was open and feces was visible. A foul odor was apparent. Resident #31 was not in the room. Resident #64 was lying in bed.Interview and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, review of the facilities Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of personnel files, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse and misappropriation of narcotic medications to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement, and staff failed to timely report an allegation of misappropriation to the Administrator. This affected two (#31 and #151) of three residents reviewed for abuse and misappropriation. The facility census was 133.Findings include:1.Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/15/25. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy and epilepsy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL).Review of the facilities SRIs from 03/27/26 to 03/30/26 revealed there was no SRI reported to the State Survey Agency involving Resident #31 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, review of the facilities investigations, review of personnel files, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and misappropriation of medications. This affected two (#31 and #151) of three residents reviewed for abuse and misappropriation. The facility census was 133.Findings include:1.Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/15/25. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy and epilepsy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL).The facility was unable to provide any investigation documents regarding the allegation of CNA #445 verbally abusing Resident #32.Interview with Resident #12 on 03/30/26 at 2:04 P.M. revealed he heard Resident #31 and CNA #445 in a loud verbal exchange including profanity over the past weekend.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, policy review, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received provide proper wound care treatment as physician ordered. This affected one (Resident #29) of seven reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 133.Findings include:Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/30/22. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of prostate and bone and metabolic encephalopathy. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was cognitively impaired.Review of the care plan dated 01/03/26 revealed Resident #29 was at risk for impaired skin integrity due to decreased mobility, incontinence, weakness, diabetes mellitus, and history of previous areas/moisture-associated skin damage (MASD). Interventions included medication(s)/treatment(s) per physician, nurse practitioner, and/or physician assistant orders.Review of the physician orders dated 03/04/26 revealed an order to apply house barrier…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, observation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received provide proper wound care treatment as physician ordered. This affected one (Resident #13) of seven residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 133. Findings include:Review of Resident #13's medical records revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, obesity, Parkinson's disease, neoplasm of behavior of bone, dementia, and peripheral vascular disease.Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had a pressure injury to right buttocks measured 3.0 centimeters (cm) in length and 2.5 cm in width with 0.2 cm depth. No slough or tunneling was present.Review of the care plan dated 02/26/26 revealed Resident #13 was at risk for impaired skin integrity as evidence by an area to right sacrum and a surgical area to abdomen. Interventions included to complete treatments per physician orders and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore the appropriate proper personal protective equipment (PPE) during high contact resident care activity for a resident under enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and staff utilized the appropriate hand hygiene during incontinence care and personal hygiene. This affected two residents (Residents #52 and #94) reviewed for infection control. The facility identified 71 residents who were under EBP. The facility census was 133. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #94 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, quadriplegia, anoxic brain damage, hepatitis B, hepatitis C and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 had impaired cognition and had EBP in place. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, hospital staff and medical transport staff, the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility after the resident was hospitalized . This affected one (#137) out of three residents reviewed for bed holds. The facility census was 134. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed an admission date of 02/21/25 with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, without status epilepticus, and bipolar disorder. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #137 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #137 had physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others (e.g., hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing, abusing others sexually) every one to three days. Resident #137 required supervision assistance with eating, oral hygiene, bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation. Resident #137 required substantial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement a pressure redistribution device or cushion to the resident's chair according to the care plan to treat a pressure ulcer. This affected one (#36) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 134. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 11/21/24 with diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, and unspecified combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident with severe cognitive impairment. Resident #36 required set-up assistance with eating, required supervision assistance with oral hygiene, required partial assistance with personal hygiene, required substantial assistance with bed mobility, transfers, ambulating, and wheelchair mobility, and was dependent on staff assistance with toileting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of hospital documentation, staff interview, local health department interview, review of Legionella water testing, review of electronic mail (email) correspondence, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their water management policy and respond to the local health department (LHD) recommendations to remediate their water system to reduce the presence of microorganisms including Legionella. This affected one (#129) of three residents reviewed for Legionella and had the potential to affect all 128 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 128. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #129 revealed an admission date of 03/23/23 and discharge date of 12/09/24. Diagnoses included but not limited to acute kidney failure, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, hypovolemic shock, Legionnaire's disease, atrial fibrillation, cocaine abuse, dermatitis, dependence on renal dialysis, and other pericardial effusion (noninflammatory). Review of Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were clean and in good repair. This affected four (#15, #36, #43, and #116) of seven resident rooms reviewed for environment. The census was 131. Findings include: 1. Observation of Resident #116's room on 12/09/24 at 11:36 A.M. revealed and adhesive fly paper strip hanging on the wall behind the head of the bed. The fly paper had dead flies and gnats on it. Interview with Resident #116 on 12/10/24 at 7:34 A.M. revealed the fly paper strip had was in the room when she moved into it. Observation revealed the fly paper strip remained on the wall. Interview with Maintenance Director (MD) #445 on 12/16/24 at 11:14 A.M. revealed a private company handles pest control for the facility. That company does not put any fly strips in resident rooms. MD #445 was unaware that a fly strip was in Resident #116's room. MD #445 confirmed fly strips should not be hung up in resident rooms and removed the fly strip. 2. Observation in Resident #36's room on 12/10/24 at 8:36 A.M. revealed a pillow lying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided privacy when toileting. This affected one (#54) out of one residents reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 131. Findings include: Review of the medical records for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 04/05/21 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had range of motion impairment on one side of bilateral upper and lower extremities, required toileting hygiene, dressing, and personal hygiene, and required substantial assistance for bathing. Observation on 12/09/24 at 2:07 P.M. Resident #54 went into the shower room to use the bathroom, due to the bathroom in his room does not work. Observation of the shower room door revealed it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded. This affected three (#67, #289 and #125) out of 26 residents reviewed during the survey. The facility census was 131. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #289 revealed an admission date of 11/19/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #289 was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment coded Resident #289 does not use oxygen. Observation on 12/09/24 at 10:52 A.M. revealed Resident #289 reclining in bed with an auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP) device delivering oxygen via a nose piece. Resident #289 stated the device is constantly on as he his doctors have told him he needs a lung transplant. Interview on 12/16/24 at 2:18 P.M. with Unit Manager #482 confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised to accurately reflect resident care. This affected two (#16 and #125) out of 26 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 131. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical records for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 09/17/23 with diagnoses of quadriplegia, unspecified open wound of left buttock, subsequent encounter, contracture of muscle, left hand, and contracture of muscle, right hand. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was cognitively intact, had impairment on bilateral upper and lower extremities. Resident #16 required set-up assistance with eating, oral hygiene, and wheelchair mobility, and required substantial assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for showers scheduled on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to assist residents with needed activities of daily living (ADL) care. This affected two (#16 and #31) out of six residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility census was 131. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical records for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 09/17/23 with diagnoses of quadriplegia, unspecified open wound of left buttock, subsequent encounter, contracture of muscle, left hand, and contracture of muscle, right hand. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was cognitively intact, had impairment on bilateral upper and lower extremities. Resident #16 required set-up assistance with eating, oral hygiene, and wheelchair mobility, and required substantial assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for showers scheduled on Tuesday,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure sore treatments were complete as ordered. This affected one (#125) out of five resident reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The facility census was 131. Findings include: Review of the medical records for Resident #125 revealed an admission date of 09/10/24, a discharge date of 09/12/24 to the hospital, and a re-admission date of 09/17/24. Diagnoses of post laminectomy syndrome, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 2, pressure ulcer of left buttock, stage 2, and pressure ulcer of right buttock, stage 2. Review if the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #125 was cognitively intact, required supervision with oral hygiene, required partial assistance with eating and personal hygiene, required substantial assistance with bathing and wheelchair mobility, and was dependent on staff assistance with toileting hygiene, dressing, bed mobility, and transfers. Further review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place for a resident at risk for falls. This affected one (#53) of two residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 131. Findings include: Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/02/15. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, low back pain, major depression disorder, hypertension, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact. Review of a care plan initiated 01/07/22 revealed Resident #53 was at risk for falls related to peripheral vascular disease, dementia with impaired cognition, and decreased mobility. Interventions listed included, keep bed in lowest position initiated on 09/14/24 and low bed initiated on 09/16/24. Review of progress notes revealed Resident #53 fell from the bed onto the floor on 09/14/24. Hospice added…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) #447 interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure indwelling catheter care was completed in accordance with the physician order and care plan. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure an adequate indication of use for an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected two (#234 and #291) out of two residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 131. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical records for Resident #291 revealed an admission date of 11/12/24 with diagnoses of encephalopathy, hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney disease or end stage renal disease, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (diagnosis added on 12/10/24). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #291 was cognitively intact, had no impairment to bilateral upper and lower extremities, required set-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene, required partial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for respiratory device and oxygen administration. This affected one (#289) out of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 131. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #289 revealed an admission date of 11/19/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the physician orders revealed no order for the use of an Automatically Adjusting Positive Airway (APAP) device. An order placed on 12/09/24 at 10:46 A.M. revealed oxygen to be administered at five liters per minute via nasal cannula. Observation on 12/09/24 at 10:52 A.M. revealed Resident #289 reclining in bed with an APAP device delivering oxygen via a nose piece. Resident #289 stated the APAP device is constantly on as he his doctors have told him he needs a lung transplant. Interview on 12/16/24 at 2:18 P.M. with Unit Manager #482 provided verification of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered resulting in four medication errors out of 40 opportunities or a 10 percent (%) medication error rate. This affected two (#105 and #125) out of three reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 131. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical records for Resident #105 revealed an admission date of 08/22/23 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition and hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #105 with severe cognitive impairment, had no impairment to bilateral upper and lower extremities. Resident #105 required partial assistance with eating and oral hygiene. Resident required substantial assistance with personal hygiene. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 12/01/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of arbitration agreements and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure facility staff knew a residents' cognitive status and ability to understand before having the resident sign an arbitration agreement. This affected one (#283) of four residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. The census was 131. Findings include: Review of Resident #283's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/20/24. Diagnose listed included type two diabetes mellitus, hypertensive heart disease, muscle weakness, prostate cancer, and vascular dementia. Review of a quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #283 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #283's brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score was four out of a possible 15. Review of social service assessment notes dated 11/21/24 at 9:10 A.M. revealed Resident #283 was alert and oriented times one (new his name). Resident #283 had a history of dementia. Review of general…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain infection control protocols for an indwelling urinary catheter bag and tubing. This affected one (#234) out of two residents reviewed for urinary catheter care. The census was 131. Findings included: Review of medical record for Resident #234 revealed admission date of 12/03/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, retention of urine. and dementia. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #234 dated 12/04/24 for Foley catheter care every shift. A care plan for Resident #234 dated 12/04/24 related to indwelling catheter revealed individualized interventions which included maintaining drainage bag below the bladder level. Observation on 12/12/24 at 8:30 A.M. of Resident #234 was in bed with eyes closed and his indwelling urinary catheter bag and tubing was lying on the floor under the bed rail. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse #439 on 12/12/24 at 8:32 A.M. verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a safe manner. This directly affected one (#137) of one random resident observed. The facility census was 138. Findings include: Observation on 07/30/24 at 11:05 A.M., revealed two medications in a small, plastic medication cup, sitting on the overbed table of Resident #137. Resident #137's roommate was observed in the room but was not independently mobile. No other residents were observed in the area. Interview at the time of the observation, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #241, verified the findings and identified the two pills as a Flomax 0.4 milligram (mg) capsule, and a gemfibrozil 600 mg tablet. LPN #137 removed the pills from the room and discarded them. Review of the medical record of Resident #137 revealed an admission date of 06/04/24. Diagnoses include hyperlipidemia and benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms. Review of the physician orders dated 06/04/24 revealed Flomax 0.4 milligrams (mg) to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident's rooms were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected two (#39 and #68) of 138 resident's rooms that were observed. The facility census was 138. Findings include: Observation on 07/30/24 at 11:05 A.M., of the oxygen concentrator beside the bed of Resident #39, with oxygen tubing attached to the machine and the oxygen in the nares of Resident #39, had a large amount of a dried white substance on the top and the front of the concentrator. Interview on 07/30/24 at 11:20 A.M., with Registered Nurse #319 provided verification the concentrator had the large amount of a dried white substance on the top and front. Observation on 07/30/24 at 11:10 A.M., of Resident #68's room revealed a large number of debris on the floor near where a room mate's bed had been. The debris included: sunflower seeds, empty water bottle, an empty can of chewing tobacco, a plastic grocery items with various items, a grabber tool, and various food particles. On the floor under the windows revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily care for a resident dependent on staff for assistance. This affected two (#20 and #49) of three residents reviewed for assistance with care needs. The facility census was 137. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #20 revealed admission date of 12/04/17. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, stroke and Crohn's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed he was rarely understood and had a long-term memory problem with modified independence cognition. He required maximum assistance for eating, and was dependent with bed mobility, transfers and toileting. He was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Observation on 03/13/24 at 2:27 P.M., of Resident #20 revealed a layer of thick plaque to his top teeth and his nails were noted to extend approximately 0.6 centimeters beyond his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility staff failed to provide proper hand hygiene after providing incontinence care to a resident. This affected two (#17, and #18) residents of three residents observed. The facility census was 137. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #18 revealed admission date of 01/13/24 with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm to the palate, Parkinson's disease and sensorineural hearing loss bilateral. Observation on 03/13/24 at 9:57 A.M., of incontinence care provided by State Tested Nurse Assistant (STNA) #103 revealed Resident #18 was incontinent of bowel. After thoroughly cleaning the stool from Resident #18, STNA #103 placed a clean incontinence product and clothes on Resident #18. STNA #103 then removed her gloves and left the room without any hand hygiene. Interview on 03/13/24 at 10:03 A.M., STNA #103 verified she did not remove her gloves directly after providing incontinence care, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interview, review of information from Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn in residents room who was positive for Coronavirus Disease 2109 (COVID-19). This affected one (#129) out of three residents sampled for infection control practices and had the potential to affect nine (#121, #122, #123, #124, #125, #126, #127, #128, and #130) additional residents who reside on the transitional care unit three. The facility census was 140. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #129 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include epilepsy, COVID-19, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, need for assistance with personal care, chronic kidney disease stage three, anxiety, major depressive disorder, polymyalgia, intellectual disabilities, and constipation. Review of Resident #129's minimum data set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide and maintain a clean resident smoking area. This affected 23 of 23 facility identified residents who smoke (Residents #39, #86, #45, #93, #89, #71, #370, #90, #68, #19, #55, #04, #15, #40, #92 ,#25, #82, #377, #07, #365, #02, #76, and #21). The facility census was 120. Findings include: Observation on 06/07/22 at 02:50 P.M. revealed two residents, Resident #76 and #71 in wheelchairs on the patio of the resident smoke area. Leading up to the patio area, an adjacent landscaped area of appropriately 10 feet by 20 feet was filled with stones, small sticks and dried peanut shells. There were greater than 50 extinguished cigarette butts in the landscaped area. Interview on 06/08/22 at 1:40 P.M. with Housekeeper #433 revealed on 06/08/22, she had cleaned the patio and cigarette butt filled area in the A.M. She verified the area is covered with sticks and peanut shells and had cigarette butts in the area daily. Interview on 06/08/22 at 1:50 P.M. with the Environmental Director #613 verified the resident smoke area was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented to address the dietary needs/recommendations of two residents. This affected two residents (#13 and #110) of five sampled residents reviewed for nutrition during the annual survey. The facility census was 120. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #110 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, fluid volume overload and lung cancer. Review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment and required supervision with eating. The MDS assessment did not indicate Resident #110 was receiving a therapeutic diet while in the facility. Review of the resident's hospital coordination of care report received by the facility's Director of Marketing and Admissions #603 on 04/29/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide meal assistance for one resident, (Resident #13) of three residents reviewed who required mealtime assistance. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson disease, upper respiratory infection, dysphagia, malnutrition, and depression. The physician ordered a mechanical altered diet, a supplement three times a day for risk of malnutrition and tube feeding of Jevity 1.5 at 65 milliliters per hour from 7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff person for meal assistance. The nutrition plan of care dated 05/23/22 revealed the resident was at risk for aspiration, swallowing problems, and chronic weakness. Interventions included provide feeding assistance as needed, provide nutrition supplement as ordered and adaptive curved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident had physician orders for a therapeutic diet. This affected one of (#110) of five residents sampled for nutrition. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #110 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, fluid volume overload and lung cancer. Review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment and required supervision with eating. The MDS assessment did not indicate Resident #110 was receiving a therapeutic diet while in the facility. Review of the resident's hospital coordination of care report received by the facility's Director of Marketing and Admissions #603 on 04/29/22 at 11:51 A.M., revealed orders for a therapeutic diet of no added salt and low K+ (potassium). Review of Resident #110's hospital discharge instructions/orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to provide medication as ordered. This affected one Resident #365 of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #365 revealed admission date 05/20/22 and discharge date [DATE]. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis of vertebra, lumbar region, inflammatory spondylopathies, low back pain, and chronic pain. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident required extensive one-person assistance for bed mobility and extensive two-person assistance for transfers. The resident received scheduled and as needed pain medications. The assessment revealed occasional pain over the last five days. Pain was rated at eight on a one to ten scale. Review of the Plan of Care dated 05/23/22 revealed the resident had potential for pain related to chronic pain. Interventions included to administer medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-13 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive feeding utensils for two residents (Residents #13 and # 363) of three residents reviewed for assistance devices. The facility census was 120. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson disease, upper respiratory infection, dysphagia, malnutrition, and depression. The physician ordered a mechanical altered diet, a supplement three times a day for risk of malnutrition and tube feeding of Jevity 1.5 at 65 milliliters per hour from 7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff person for meal assistance. The nutrition plan of care dated 05/23/22 revealed the resident was at risk for aspiration, swallowing problems, and chronic weakness. The Dietetic Technician # 605 entered an intervention on 03/18/22 to provide adaptive equipment curved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to label, date and discard resident refrigerated foods on three nursing units, (Nursing Unit 100, Memory Care Unit and C-1/CD-1/D-2 Unit) of three units reviewed. This had the potential to affect 72 of 120 residents identified by the facility to receive foods on these units. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Observation on 06/09/22 at 8:19 AM resident food storage refrigerator on 100 unit revealed no temperature log was completed for dates of 06/03/22, 06/04/22, 06/05/22 and 06/08/22. One container of supplement, Med Pass, was not dated, and one was dated of 04/18/22. There were four containers of various foods including a soup container, meat container, fruit container and an unknown food container with no labels and dates. There was a sign on the outside door of the refrigerator, No Employee Food- all food must be labeled and dated. Interview on 06/08/22 at 8:20 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 509 verified the supplement was expired, the supplement container not dated, and foods in containers were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$35,968 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $35,968 — penalty dated 2024-12-16
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-08 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CROWN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CROWN OHIO HOLDCO II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/01/2019
CROWN II TBD HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/29/2021
FEJCC TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025
MRS FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025
NEUMAN, MARKIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2019
SINGER, MEIRIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2019
CAPITAL FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/06/2025
DAUBENMIRE, KEVINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025
FRIEDMAN, YISRAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2019
ELKINS WAY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/31/2022
BANKS, UGOLAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
ROBINSON, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2019
MDATAS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$929K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 4%Other / private 22%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $929K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$302per resident / day
operating cost
$9,184per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$297per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365278. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next